Transcript Highlights:

• Are they all of a sudden not eligible, and then they get on to a yo-yo thing?
• because they had comorbidities, they because they had comorbidities, they were<00:25:08.760> eligible
• ,<00:25:09.400> they<00:25:09.520> got<00:25:09.840> them, were eligible, they
• got them, were eligible, they got them, and<00:25:11.000> then<00:25:11.320> they<00:25
• , and then they of a sudden not eligible, and then they get<00:25:19.240> on<00:25:19.400>

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• They look at data sets, do their own investigation, and they make an eligibility determination.
• They compare that eligibility determination to the eligibility determination that we made when the client
• They look at data sets, do their own investigation, and they make an eligibility determination.
• They compare that eligibility determination to the eligibility determination that we made when the client
• And so we push the eligibility time period in which they come in and check in with us for that eligibility

Summary: The committee first considered the confirmation of Dr. John Lattell to the Board of Medicine. In questioning, senators focused heavily on his views about abortion, vaccines, ivermectin, and the role of CDC/FDA guidance in board discipline cases. Dr. Lattell said the board applies Florida statutes and works through probable cause panels and legal counsel, but he also expressed strong pro-life views, skepticism of federal health guidance, and criticism of vaccines and some medical practices. Supporters praised his long medical career, military service, and family medicine background, while opponents argued his views could prevent him from being objective in disciplinary matters. The committee voted to recommend him for confirmation to the full Senate, with Senators Polsky and Ruson voting no. The committee then took up the confirmation of Taylor Hatch as Secretary of the Department of Children and Families. Hatch described her background in state human services and outlined priorities centered on accountability, data, lived experience, and improving service delivery. Senators asked about SNAP error rates, Hope Florida, legislative analyses, staffing, and the department’s handling of child welfare and medically complex cases. Hatch said the department was reducing SNAP error rates, that Hope Florida uses navigators to connect people with community resources and self-sufficiency supports, and that DCF is working with the Department of Health and other partners to improve investigations and accountability in child welfare. She also said the agency is reviewing medically complex cases and strengthening oversight of community-based care providers through contracts, audits, and proposed funding-model changes. A substantial portion of the Hatch discussion centered on whether the department had been responsive to legislative requests and whether it had provided timely bill analyses. Senators also pressed her on Hope Florida staffing, the number of participants served, and the Hope Florida Foundation’s compliance and legal oversight. Hatch said the foundation is undergoing a financial audit and that the department is relying on required reports and ongoing investigations. The transcript ends amid continued questioning about a community-based care contractor’s finances, related-party transactions, and whether further forensic audits or repayments are needed.

Transcript Highlights:

• If they were enrolled previously, then not enrolled, and that they're otherwise eligible for enrollment
• there's several provisions that clarify the PSO statutes and about charter school students being eligible
• 05.439> otherwise enrolled and that they're otherwise enrolled and that they're otherwise eligible
• > enrollment<00:04:07.040> and<00:04:07.280> haven't<00:04:07.599> been eligible
• for enrollment and haven't been eligible for enrollment and haven't been uh<00:04:08.480> enrolled

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It is expected to bypass 800 participating districts in the next round of approvals, expanding eligibility
• We know what the total number of school-eligible children have grown since.
• First, House Bill 2, as passed by the House, included students with disabilities and pre-K eligibility
• And really importantly, currently, because they are not eligible for pre-K based on their disability,
• Yes, so currently schools are able to offer. tuition-based pre-K to non-eligible families.

Bills: HB2

Keywords: public education, teacher compensation, certification, funding, school finance, educator rights, education funding, charter schools, staff compensation, state aid, retention allotment, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Gymnasiums were in a separate funding category eligible for only 15% of funds allocated in any given
• Also, do students who are income eligible at private schools...
• It's only public school students only, so if you're income eligible, even although you go to a private
• school, you have a scholarship, you're not eligible for this.
• you're not eligible for this that is correct okay that answers a question for my wife who works with

Summary: The committee’s first major discussion focused on higher education facilities across UC, CSU, and the community colleges, with Chair Alvarez framing the issue as a final budget hearing before the May Revise. The LAO presented findings that campuses have grown substantially in buildings and square footage, while classroom and lab utilization remains below legislative standards and deferred maintenance backlogs continue to rise. The LAO also emphasized that the state and segments lack comprehensive data on capital renewal spending and recommended better reporting, clearer funding targets, and long-term planning for renewal and maintenance. UC, CSU, and community college representatives each described large five-year capital plans, aging facilities, seismic and deferred maintenance needs, and the role of student housing, while noting that construction costs are rising faster than inflation. Members questioned the segments about debt service, utilization rates, and how projects are prioritized. UC said its debt service tied to state support is about $665 million annually and described a $30 billion five-year capital financial plan, including housing, medical centers, and building renewal. CSU said it has about $31 billion in five-year needs and more than $8 billion in deferred maintenance, with funding coming from a mix of state-related and one-time sources since the state shifted capital responsibility to CSU. Community colleges said their unmet facilities needs total about $33.5 billion and explained their use of a scoring matrix and FUSION system to rank projects. The chair and members pressed all three systems to better distinguish between projects that are truly shovel-ready and those that are long-term needs, and discussed whether facilities condition data, total cost of ownership, and more standardized metrics should guide future bond proposals. The committee then turned to Proposition 2 and the Governor’s proposed community college capital outlay projects. The Department of Finance said Prop. 2 provides $1.5 billion for community colleges and that the Governor’s budget proposes 29 projects, with two continuing Prop. 51 projects also included. The LAO supported the overall use of the funds but raised concerns about the current 65/35 split between modernization and growth, the unusually large share of gymnasium projects, and some scoring metrics that favor larger campuses and certain regions. Community college officials said the scoring system was developed through participatory governance and would take one to two years to revise, but they supported the funding and agreed to follow up on questions about project categories and the rationale for the weighting. Members also suggested giving more weight to modernization, regional access, and intersegmental or collaborative projects. A final item addressed the CalKids program. The Department of Finance proposed $56,000 ongoing General Fund for three positions, while the LAO recommended approving two positions but rejecting a manager position until the current $7.5 million marketing campaign is evaluated. ScholarShare’s executive director said CalKids has enrolled more than 5 million children, with nearly 600,000 claims and over $45 million distributed, and argued that additional staff and outreach are needed to reach a goal of 1 million claimed scholarships by the end of 2025 and to implement AB 2808. Members asked about marketing effectiveness, data sharing, and eligibility rules, and the program said it is expanding partnerships with Cradle to Career and CSAC. No final vote was taken in the hearing, and the chair indicated the facilities item would be held open.

Transcript Highlights:

• Over 83% of all eligible individuals are actually registered to vote in California.
• voters, and encouraging eligible voters to vote.
• voters, and encouraging eligible voters to vote.
• If enacted in its current form, it risks disenfranchising thousands of eligible California citizens,
• Our whole office and our whole job is to make sure that every eligible voter has an ability to vote.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 heard updates from the Secretary of State, EDD, the State Controller’s Office, CalHR, and DGS on a range of budget proposals and federal policy impacts. Secretary of State Shirley Weber opened with remarks about California’s election system, emphasizing its safety, transparency, high voter registration and vote-by-mail participation, and the office’s response to bomb threats and other election threats. Her staff then presented funding requests for the Cal-Access Replacement System (CARS) and Help America Vote Act/VoteCal activities, describing them as needed to modernize campaign finance and lobbying disclosure systems and maintain election security and voter services. A major portion of the hearing focused on federal election policy, especially the potential effects of a presidential executive order and the SAVE Act. Secretary of State staff said California would face significant, potentially unquantifiable costs if forced to comply, including new burdens on county recorders, county election offices, and the Secretary of State’s office, and warned of voter disenfranchisement, especially for students, seniors, disabled voters, military and overseas voters, rural residents, and people with limited transportation. Members and public commenters strongly opposed the federal proposals and argued California’s current system is functioning well. The committee also heard that federal HAVA funds were not expected to be at risk because the state draws them down into an interest-bearing account. EDD reported on paid family leave, explaining that recent delays were tied to a system transition and increased claim volume, and said it was simplifying applications and adding staff and automation. Public testimony supported expanding paid family leave to chosen family. EDD also said it is prepared for possible unemployment spikes, citing a recession plan, a command center, and recent hiring. The State Controller’s Office requested funding to continue the Fiscal migration project, which would move the state’s accounting book of record to the new system by July 1, 2026; Finance and LAO had no objections, and the committee expressed support for the project’s progress. CalHR presented a proposal for a statewide recruitment, outreach, and education paid media campaign under AB 1511, saying its current advertising budget is too small to reach diverse communities effectively. The final item addressed Governor Newsom’s executive order requiring a return to office on a four-day schedule. CalHR and DGS said they were working department-by-department to assess space, parking, transit, and other logistics, but had not completed a statewide cost analysis. Members and many public commenters criticized the order, arguing it was rushed, costly, harmful to telework benefits, and potentially disruptive to workers, especially those with disabilities, caregiving responsibilities, or long commutes. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• AND WE HAVE THEM PROVIDE ACCESS TO BRIGHT FUTURES ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION IN ONLINE ACT PREP RESOURCES
• FOR STUDENTS WHO MEET CERTAIN ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA.
• PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE DATABASE SO THAT INDIVIDUALS CAN LOOK UP THE STATUS AND KNOW THAT IF THEY ARE ELIGIBLE
• ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE ABLE TO DO THIS?
• THEY MIGHT INVESTIGATE IT AS INDICATED AND DISCOVER THAT PROBLEMS ARE ALLOWED LOW ELIGIBLE SIGNATURES

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We removed the two-year internship eligibility window to be considered as an internal applicant.
• We also defined reinstatement and interagency transfer to clarify employee eligibility for new hire leave
• We remove the two-year internship eligibility window to be considered as an internal applicant.
• Section 407.3702, under definitions, we updated the definition of eligible employee.
• We had three bills, 1177, 1274, and 1419, which expanded the eligibility for the public safety defined

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Are y'all currently with commercial or eligible to bill commercial insurance or Medicare?
• This amendment set clarifies who is eligible to participate within an insurance network of vision health
• We know that there are other issues that exist out there in regard to verifying eligibility and verifying
• So the human service districts and authorities will assist academic health centers identify eligible
• This is... ...will assist academic health centers identify eligible participants with opioid use disorders

Summary: The House Committee on Health and Welfare met on April 28 with a quorum and took up several Senate bills, beginning with SB 113 on the local health care provider participation program in Calcasieu Parish. The committee adopted a technical amendment and heard that the bill would shift the local sponsor from the parish to the city if needed by a June 1 deadline. After brief discussion and no opposition, SB 113 was reported favorably with amendments. The committee then approved SB 23, which exempts certain assisted living facilities licensed by LDH from the definition of food service establishment, and SB 150, which would allow LDH to scan and electronically store vital records supporting documents and return originals to citizens. SB 221 also advanced after testimony that it would allow EMS providers to be reimbursed by Medicaid for emergency responses where treatment is provided on scene but the patient is not transported. Members discussed that the bill could reduce unnecessary ER use and likely would require some rulemaking, but it was reported favorably. A major portion of the meeting focused on SB 404, a broad vision benefit plan reform bill. Supporters, including optometrists, said the measure would improve transparency, patient choice, and access to eye care by limiting restrictive plan practices; opponents from the vision care plan industry argued it was an unprecedented, provider-driven overhaul that could raise costs and reduce flexibility. After extensive testimony and an agreed amendment clarifying network participation, the committee reported SB 404 favorably with amendments. The committee also reported SB 32 favorably with amendments after emotional testimony from parents and advocates about perinatal bereavement care, cooling devices, and training for hospitals to give grieving families more time and dignity after infant loss. Finally, the committee heard SB 43, which would create a psychedelic-assisted therapy initiative within LDH for clinical research and treatment involving ibogaine and psilocybin, with testimony from veterans, researchers, and advocates describing potential benefits for PTSD, substance use, and traumatic brain injury. The bill was reported favorably with amendments and set to pass a courtesy sheet. The committee then began SB 253, a bill regulating peptides and compounding pharmacies, adopted technical amendments clarifying provider liability, and continued discussion as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• We had another case where a county employee was tasked with determining which citizens are eligible for
• We had another case where a county employee was tasked with determining which citizens are eligible for
• in certain prosecutor petition documents, and requiring that victims be notified if an offense is eligible
• expand the circumstances where prosecutors are required to notify the victim that an offense is eligible
• expand the circumstances where the prosecutors are required to notify the victim that in offenses eligible

Bills: HF3489, HF3990, HF3825, HF3826, HF3827, HF3822

Keywords: grooming, child protection, student safety, sexual exploitation, educator licensing, teacher discipline, mandatory reporting, mandated reporter training, school misconduct, predatory offender, child abuse, sexual abuse, sex trafficking, child sexual abuse material, child pornography, position of authority, school employee, school administrator, license revocation, license suspension

Transcript Highlights:

• being that under comparability, you have to offer the same benefit and services to all individuals eligible
• being that under comparability, you have to offer the same benefit and services to all individuals eligible
• You have to offer it to everyone that is eligible for Medicaid. So there are fewer options there.
• You have to offer it to everyone that is eligible for Medicaid. So there are fewer options there.
• There's no retroactive eligibility in a waiver.

Summary: The Administrative Rules Subcommittee of the Arkansas Legislative Council reviewed several agency rules and requests. It approved without objection an Insurance Department amendment implementing Act 261’s holding company system requirements, two State Board of Election Commissioners rules on poll watchers/provisional voting and certified election monitors, and a Treasurer of State rule removing DEI-related membership requirements to comply with Act 938. The committee also held over for a month a Department of Education request related to excluding a rule from reporting requirements so it could be discussed further with the Department of Commerce. A major portion of the meeting focused on the Department of Human Services’ request to be excluded from rulemaking for Acts 567, 568, 967, and 1025. DHS said federal CMS guidance created comparability and other issues for the Medicaid-related dental and diagnostic lab provisions, making it difficult to implement the acts as written by their effective dates. DHS outlined possible paths, including broader adult dental coverage, waivers, or splitting the dental rate increase from the special-needs cap increase. The Arkansas State Dental Association disputed DHS’s approach, arguing Act 1025 is workable, that the pediatric rate increase should move forward separately, and that DHS should continue pursuing the law rather than stop rulemaking. Committee members questioned both sides extensively about CMS correspondence, waiver timelines, fiscal impact, and whether the acts could be severed. After testimony from DHS, the Dental Association, and a public commenter, the committee adopted a motion not to exclude DHS from reporting requirements for Acts 567, 568, 967, and 1025, meaning DHS must continue the normal rulemaking/reporting process. The committee then accepted the Division of Higher Education’s report, which recommended repealing three of its 32 rules and keeping the remaining 29 in effect. It also received routine written updates on older and newer rulemaking items and filed the monthly updates without further action.

Transcript Highlights:

• statute, whether it's in statute or the capital budget language, there are match requirements and eligibility
• a single meeting we've had where we've left saying, oh, there's something else that you might be eligible
• Morton and Elma and Reardan and Chelan that have finished up their comprehensive plan and they're eligible
• Then allowing them the opportunity to still access some of those funds that they'd be eligible for, but
• So an example would be if a district were to say, you know, have eligibility for, we'll say, eight million

Summary: The Capital Budget Committee heard presentations from the Department of Commerce, the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), and a consultant on the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) study. Commerce officials described their agency’s role in housing, energy, local government, broadband, and other capital programs, and reported on a $5 million pilot under Senate Bill 5200 that used trusted community messengers and technical assistance to help historically excluded organizations prepare for capital funding. They said 18 organizations received direct support and 79 smaller projects were also funded, but emphasized that statutory match rules, reimbursement-based payments, site-control requirements, insurance and audit costs, and extensive contracting rules remain major barriers. Commerce outlined efforts to expand outreach, digital modernization, internal contracting improvements, tribal MOUs, and innovation centers, and members asked about small business support, housing program placement, and outreach to Eastern Washington and communities of color. RCO described its grant programs for recreation, conservation, education, and salmon/orca recovery, and reviewed equity work done before and after a 2021-23 proviso. The agency had already created a small-communities carve-out in youth athletic facilities, piloted stipends for advisory committee members, and reduced match requirements where allowed. Under the proviso, RCO completed an equity review and a planning program that funded 54 projects across 34 counties, with many applicants being new or long-absent grantees. Staff said the review led to changes in scoring criteria, clearer application guidance, more objective data measures, expanded technical assistance, and targeted community engagement. Members asked about application burden, project sizes, outreach, and how the agency is broadening participation and representation on advisory committees. The final presentation summarized a planning study on SCAP, which examined rising construction costs, fragmented grant programs, local funding barriers, and uneven district capacity. The report recommended nine major changes, including stronger planning support, a new minor-modernization category, a mechanism to use unused funds more quickly, an education-specification prototype, a SCAP enhancement program for low-capacity districts, acceptance of non-SCAP funds, phased modernization, streamlined D-form and reimbursement processes, and revisions to the SCAP formula to better account for grade-band differences, enrollment projections, and regional cost factors. Additional recommendations included ongoing monitoring and evaluation, facilities-impact reviews, matching SCAP increases to construction-cost inflation, earlier locking of funding estimates, flexible program spaces, and updated statewide building-condition assessments. No votes were taken during the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, our state cemeteries have seen an uptick because people are aware that they're eligible to be buried
• The park passes, we had only done, from FY 24, that 1094 was only the number of 100 percent eligible
• And a double plot, the second is a dependent or a spouse who is eligible to be buried in the same plot
• There's a great deal of information here about SNAP eligibility changes, different qualification data
• Another great table here to talk about what it looks like for service members and SNAP eligibility.

Transcript Highlights:

• This can have an impact on their eligibility.
• And when people roll off of the Medicaid rolls, they're no longer, I guess, eligible to be receiving
• So it would be a fun fact to me to see whether or not those who are eligible for those tax cuts, those
• What I will say is that potential eligibility changes or work requirements that might change who's eligible
• Or other benefits, they may not be what we call directly certified as receiving or being eligible for

Transcript Highlights:

• And so it's on the workforce, it's the employers as well as the beneficiaries that could be eligible
• c><00:22:34.720> um the beneficiaries that could be um the beneficiaries that could be um eligible
• for family paid and medical eligible for family paid and medical leave.<00:22:39.440> Okay.
• 25.480> facilitation requirements and then facilitation requirements and then facilitation eligibility
• eligibility eligibility criteria<00:26:29.039> benefit<00:26:29.520> duration<00:26:30.000

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Particularly those who are uncertain about their eligibility, deterring participation in elections.
• This is why we recommend... 221 eligible Texan hoping to participate in our democracy feels empowered
• This number is a graph that shows generally he remained eligible for the federal bailout requirements
• We do it in a number of situations, whether they're eligible, as long as they're eligible and they can
• They're eligible and the process is fair. Thank you. Thank you for coming to testify.

Bills: SB108, SB318, SB507, SB511, SB533, SB1026, SB1386, SB1433, SB1434, SB1596

Keywords: elections, Election Code, poll workers, election clerks, presiding judge, alternate presiding judge, polling place, central counting station, county chair, political party, gubernatorial election, vote counting, election administration, Texas elections, precinct officials, ballot counting, county election officials, election integrity, election fraud, Attorney General

Transcript Highlights:

• just from capping inflation, and I think we have to do a number of things, including looking at eligibility
• :48.159> including<00:26:48.559> looking<00:26:48.760> at<00:26:49.000> eligibility
• things including looking at eligibility things including looking at eligibility and<00:26:50.120
• <00:26:56.960> to<00:26:57.120> look counties to look at eligibility to look counties
• to look at eligibility to look at<00:26:57.440> services<00:26:57.799> that<00:26:57.919

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 3026, allowing the town of Williamstown to expand financial eligibility for senior property
• An act allowing the town of Williamstown to expand financial eligibility for senior property tax exemptions
• An act allowing the town of Williamstown to expand financial eligibility for senior property tax exemptions
• An act, allowing the town of Williamstown to expand financial eligibility for senior property tax exemptions

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The House opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and first took up a Rules Committee report recommending adoption of a resolution honoring the 200th anniversary of the Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church in New Bedford. The House suspended the rules and adopted the resolution. The Steering, Policy and Scheduling Committee then reported a series of local bills for consideration, including measures on legal notices, charter changes for Chicopee, Bridgewater, Wellesley, Weston, Somerville, and Watertown, as well as bills on firefighter residency, a checkout bag fee in Sudbury, senior tax exemption eligibility in Williamstown, and liquor licenses in Lexington. The House suspended Rule 7A, gave the bills second reading, and ordered them to a third reading. The House also considered a Ways and Means report on H. 4257, financing long-term improvements to municipal roads and bridges. The committee recommended an amendment in the form of a substitute bill, H. 4307, authorizing $1.185 billion in general obligation bonds. After suspension of the rules, the House adopted the amendment and ordered the bill to a third reading. Later, during floor debate on H. 4307, members spoke in support of the bill as a major transportation funding package, emphasizing Chapter 90 aid, road mileage-based distribution, culvert and small bridge repairs, congestion relief projects, and the bill’s fiscal and credit-rating benefits. A roll call was ordered, and the bill passed to be engrossed 156-0. The House also passed to be engrossed a bill validating the results of a special election in Hardwick. In addition, the House adopted an order to meet the next day at 11 a.m. and agreed to adjourn in memory of former Representative and Senator Matthew C. Patrick of Falmouth. The session included several guest introductions, including Mandela Fellows studying at Bridgewater State University, former legislator Vincent Dimacido, Bellingham Council on Aging guests, and interns in Representative Linsky’s office.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also... ...anticipating or have seen declining enrollment or growth in districts, also increased eligibility
• or reduced eligibility for certain categorical expenditures.
• Also increased eligibility or reduced eligibility for certain categorical expenditures.
• ... ...partnership fund account and that money sits there to be used as needed for eligible projects
• high-cost occurrences, which is a reimbursement funding mechanism for districts and charters for eligible

Summary: The House and Senate Education Committee first approved minutes from February 2 and 3, then heard an interim study proposal on Arkansas adult education and the Excel Center model, presented by Goodwill Industries of Arkansas and the University of Notre Dame’s Lab for Economic Opportunities. Witnesses argued that about 300,000 Arkansas adults lack a high school diploma or GED and described the Excel Center as a diploma-granting public charter option for adults 19 and older, with wraparound supports such as child care, transportation, tutoring, life coaching, and career services. They said the Arkansas campuses are not state-funded, highlighted growth in enrollment and graduation outcomes, and cited research showing improved employment, earnings, and reduced criminal justice involvement for graduates. Committee members discussed the role of Goodwill’s nonprofit mission, the need for multiple adult education pathways, and the relationship between adult education challenges and broader state efforts such as LEARNS and ACCESS. The committee then debated the interim study proposal procedure, including whether questions should have been taken before the vote. The motion to adopt the ISP passed, and members noted that the study would broadly examine adult education, GED testing, high school diplomas, charter schools, in-person adult education, and funding allocation. Several members asked for follow-up information on current adult education funding, the availability of Excel Centers, and the criminal justice study results. After that, staff from the Bureau of Legislative Research gave a detailed adequacy funding overview for Arkansas K-12 education. They reviewed national funding principles and then explained Arkansas’s revenue streams and distribution system, including general revenue, the Educational Excellence Trust Fund, the Educational Adequacy Fund, local property-tax revenues, and facilities partnership funding. They also walked through the state’s foundation formula, categorical aid, supplemental aid, and additional funding, including the per-student matrix amount of $7,771 for 2025 and how funds are allocated to districts and charters. Members asked about student support staff, special education high-cost occurrences, ALE funding, teacher salary equalization, and the Excel Center’s treatment in funding totals; staff said some of those questions would be addressed in a later spending presentation. The meeting ended after the committee was told the department was present mainly to answer questions and no further business remained.

Transcript Highlights:

• President, and how many charter schools will be eligible for this $265 million?
• The eligibility criteria has changed. What's the role of those FTEs in that department?
• To be eligible, the retiree must have completed at least six years of Service in the special risk class
• We're going to broaden the scope of programs that are eligible to receive this line funding.
• Eligible to receive this line funding and to improve our workforce.

Keywords: 998, house, all