Transcript Highlights:

• change<00:45:05.440> and<00:45:05.599> so<00:45:05.839> that<00:45:06.000>
• 45:50.160> our<00:45:50.480> state<00:45:50.800> educators<00:45:51.359> or
• or your state<00:45:52.000> educators<00:45:52.560> are<00:45:52.720> also<00:45
• :58.800> know<00:45:58.960> and<00:45:59.200> be<00:45:59.359> able<00:45
• <01:45:12.000> So,<01:45:12.159> I<01:45:12.400> can<01:45:12.480> run

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call - 00:13 Approval of Minutes - 4:07 Kentucky Academic Standards for Reading and Writing - 5:18 Math Improvement Committee Report - 21:02 ETS Praxis Exam - 41:47 KDE Performance Review Data - 1:15:04 Adjournment - 1:57:54, 958, all

Summary: The committee heard a presentation from KDE on the revised Kentucky academic standards for reading and writing. KDE explained the statutory six-year review process, the public comment periods, and the main revisions, including updates tied to the science of reading, decodable text, encoding/decoding, and an updated vision statement. KDE said 308 responses were received on the initial public comment, most respondents favored keeping standards as-is, and about 12% of standards were revised. The department also said the document was streamlined by removing repeated graphics and reducing its size by about 24%, and that a later comment period drew more than 400 responses. No new standards were flagged for review. Members asked about alignment between standards, curriculum, assessments, and NAEP, and KDE said instructional resources should be aligned to standards, KSA assessments are aligned to the standards, and screeners/diagnostics help identify student needs. Representative Truett raised the idea of a textbook-to-standards crosswalk, and KDE said publishers and a future repository partner should provide such crosswalks for local districts. Representative Bojanowski asked why foundational reading skills are not directly assessed on the third-grade KSA; KDE responded that the assessment is designed to measure end-of-grade expectations, while screening and diagnostics are used earlier to identify decoding needs. Representative Gel asked about early childhood supports, and KDE said it is working with early learning and special education offices and promoting LETRS professional learning for both teachers and preschool educators. The committee then received the mathematics improvement committee report. KDE said the mathematics committee unanimously approved a new strategic plan for improving math achievement from pre-K through grade 20 and adult education. The plan centers on six priorities: student empowerment, effective mathematics teaching and learning, continuous educator development and growth, a continuum of learning, community and family partnerships, and teacher recruitment and retention. KDE said the plan is intended as a living document with goals, recommended actions, and evidence bases, and that it aligns with the Kentucky Numeracy Counts Act by supporting high-quality instructional resources, professional learning, and family resources. In response to Senator Thomas, KDE explained that the professional learning recommendation means districts should tailor teacher training to classroom needs and instructional materials so math teachers are better equipped to implement standards and support students.

Transcript Highlights:

• <03:45:11.880> McFarland<03:45:12.880> thank<03:45:13.040> you<03:45:13.120>
• :45:23.080> uh<03:45:23.319> what<03:45:23.479> your<03:45:23.720> thoughts
• c> on<03:45:24.920> why<03:45:25.359> it<03:45:25.560> might<03:45:25.880>
• > be<03:45:26.880> uh<03:45:27.040> either<03:45:27.319> a<03:45:27.439>
• > a<03:45:27.920> bad<03:45:28.199> thing<03:45:28.600> to<03:45:29.040><

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard CACR 6, a proposed constitutional amendment by Representative Keith Ammon to recognize a fundamental right to use computation resources. Ammon argued that computing is now essential to daily life, speech, education, and economic opportunity, and said the amendment was intended to push back against government or corporate restrictions, citing a 2023 federal executive order on AI registration and reporting as an example of the kind of precedent he wanted to oppose. He said the proposal should be simple and clear because it would go to voters, and he compared the right to compute to other constitutional rights that do not require the government to provide the underlying tools. Committee members raised concerns about the breadth of the language, including whether it could affect encryption, authentication, network security, energy use, and other regulatory issues. Representative McFarland questioned whether the amendment could interfere with security measures, while others asked whether it would prevent ordinary network management such as throttling or require the state to provide internet access or hardware. Ammon responded that the right would not entitle someone to other people’s resources and said encryption and similar issues would sort themselves out. Several members also raised concerns about child safety, public safety, and whether existing laws could still regulate misuse of computing; Ammon said reasonable limits would still apply, similar to other constitutional rights. Sarah Scott of Americans for Prosperity testified in support, saying the amendment would protect innovation, individual autonomy, and economic competitiveness by preventing overregulation. After questions concluded, the chair closed the hearing on CACR 6. The committee then opened House Bill 615, sponsored by Representative Dan Maguire, which would substantially rewrite the state’s drug-forfeiture law. Maguire said the bill is intended to improve fairness and efficiency in cases where property such as cars or cash is seized in connection with drug offenses, noting that the criminal case and the civil forfeiture case are currently handled separately, with the property case prosecuted by the Attorney General’s office. He explained that the bill addresses courtroom procedure for these forfeiture actions and is meant to make the process more specific and orderly.

Transcript Highlights:

• we'll hear the administration's spending plan for the climate smart agriculture and biodiversity chapters
• Overall, we find that the spending plan is reasonable for this chapter of Proposition 4.
• Overall, we find that the spending plan is reasonable for this chapter of Proposition 4.
• And so I do wonder within the ag chapter how what is the approach given that quite a bit of it relates
• And just want to first support the administration's proposal for Prop 4 spending in the ag chapter.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee heard the administration’s spending plan for Proposition 4’s climate smart agriculture and biodiversity chapters, along with related trailer bill language. CDFA outlined proposed funding for existing programs such as SWEEP, Healthy Soils, Urban Agriculture, and invasive species work, plus new or phased-in programs including year-round and mobile farmers’ markets, tribal food sovereignty, and regional farm equipment sharing. The Department of Conservation described funding for the California Farmland Conservancy Program and Working Lands and Riparian Corridors Program, while the Department of Finance and LAO discussed pending allocations and generally found the overall approach reasonable, though LAO suggested the Legislature may want more statutory guidance and reporting, especially for new programs. Members focused on implementation details, equity, and accountability. Questions covered how programs would serve vulnerable and disadvantaged communities, whether new solicitations would be reopened for previously oversubscribed grants, how outcomes are tracked, and how to structure guidance for new programs such as farm equipment sharing. The chair emphasized that the Legislature wants clearer direction on program design and noted that AB 2313 should guide implementation of the regional farm equipment sharing allocation. The committee also discussed the administration’s request to directly appropriate bond funds to departments and to exempt bond program guidelines from the Administrative Procedures Act; LAO supported the APA exemption with possible legislative guardrails for public notice and comment. The committee then heard on the farm-to-school proposal, with CDFA requesting $24.9 million General Fund for incubator grants, technical assistance, and network support. CDFA said the program has reached nearly half of California schoolchildren and has shown strong demand and positive evaluation results. LAO supported the core program but recommended rejecting the $3 million technical assistance component as too broad and suggested the Legislature consider using Proposition 98 for some of the funding. Members debated that point, with some expressing concern about using General Fund dollars for a new discretionary request during a tight budget year. The biodiversity and nature-based solutions chapter included funding for the Wildlife Conservation Board, state conservancies, and tribal nature-based solutions. WCB described major recent investments and proposed projects tied to 30 by 30, habitat restoration, tribal partnerships, and public access. Members raised concerns about long-term stewardship, the size of the WCB allocation, and whether the Legislature should receive more detail on how funds will be distributed. The committee also heard requests for Bolsa Chica wetlands maintenance and Rincon Island decommissioning funding from the State Lands Commission, with members questioning long-term liability, remediation costs, and the role of private oil operators. No votes were taken, and the hearing ended with public comment from stakeholders largely supporting the APA exemption, farm-to-school funding, biodiversity investments, and related conservation programs.

Transcript Highlights:

• > that<01:45:07.280> does<01:45:07.600> make<01:45:07.760> a<01:45:08.080
• > we<01:45:31.440> need<01:45:31.520> a<01:45:31.679> lot<01:45:31.760>
• <01:45:36.000> growth<01:45:36.320> rate<01:45:36.480> than<01:45:36.639>
• <01:45:37.520> So,<01:45:38.159> we<01:45:38.400> need<01:45:38.560> to
• If<01:45:44.080> we<01:45:44.320> don't<01:45:44.480> meet<01:45:44.639> it

Bills: HB2284

Keywords: energy assistance, low-income households, electricity costs, Hawaii home energy assistance program, energy efficiency, 910, house, all

Summary: The hearing covered House Bill 2284, which would create the Hawaii Home Energy Assistance Program in the Department of Human Services to help qualifying households pay energy bills and direct the Public Utilities Commission’s public benefits fee administrator to provide information and assistance to recipients. Testimony from the Division of Consumer Advocacy, DHS, and the Public Utilities Commission was in support. A committee member asked about how the program would interact with existing TANF-related energy assistance and whether rules could be adjusted to avoid duplicative benefits; DHS said logistics would need to be worked out and that the agencies would make the rules. The committees noted the bill’s $1.5 million appropriation and moved it forward with amendments, including blanking out amounts and noting them in the committee report. Both committees voted to pass HB 2284 with amendments, with the recommendation adopted. The committee then heard House Bill 2486, relating to plug-in or balcony solar. DCCA, the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission, and the Public Utilities Commission stood on prior testimony in support of the bill’s intent. Multiple advocates and organizations, including Carbon Cashback Hawaii, 350 Hawaii, Bright Saver, Sierra Club of Hawaii, and others, testified in support, arguing that plug-in solar would lower electricity bills, expand access for renters and condo residents, and reduce emissions. Several speakers urged the committee to remove or avoid registration, reporting, feed-in tariff, interconnection fee, and other requirements they said would create barriers. Bright Saver testified that the systems are safe and would not back-feed during outages. No vote was taken on HB 2486 during the excerpt. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 1568, which would prohibit the importation or storage of LNG in the state and the construction of related infrastructure. State agencies including the Consumer Advocate, Hawaii State Energy Office, Public Utilities Commission, and Hawaiian Electric opposed the bill, with the Energy Office arguing LNG would perpetuate oil use on Oahu and expose the state to price volatility. Supporters included Life of the Land, Sierra Club of Hawaii, Greenpeace Hawaii, 350 Hawaii, Earthjustice, Our Hawaii, and others, who argued LNG would lock Hawaii into another fossil fuel dependency, create major infrastructure costs and safety risks, and undermine the state’s renewable energy goals. Several testifiers cited climate and affordability concerns and urged the committee to reject LNG. The excerpt ends during testimony on HB 1568, before any committee action or vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:45:07.480> I<00:45:07.520> know<00:45:07.680> there's<00:45:07.920> a
• I know there's a trigger<00:45:08.320> process<00:45:08.760> where<00:45:08.920> the
• process where the data comes through<00:45:10.560> uh<00:45:11.000> the<00:45:11.160><
• c> system<00:45:11.640> from<00:45:11.800> the<00:45:11.920> federal through
• <00:45:12.680> state<00:45:13.000> agencies<00:45:14.080> to<00:45:14.400>

Bills: HF4110, HF4101, HF4144, HF3546

Keywords: workplace regulations, employee rights, meal breaks, rest breaks, exemptions, medical assistance, data matching, eligibility, reporting, human services, assisted living, health regulations, inspection authority, vulnerable adults, local government, program integrity, high-risk providers, enrollment requirements, fraud prevention, compliance

Transcript Highlights:

• , farm<01:45:43.160> stands,<01:45:43.520> home<01:45:43.800> are<01:45:44.480><
• <01:45:48.640> product<01:45:49.000> is<01:45:49.120> exempt<01:45:49.640> from
• have<01:45:56.960> anything<01:45:57.280> to<01:45:57.360> do<01:45:57.600>
• 45:15.920> be<03:45:16.040> done<03:45:16.280> before<03:45:16.600> this<
• to<03:45:18.840> carry<03:45:19.080> it<03:45:19.200> forward,<03:45:19.600>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• c> end<00:45:51.040> up<00:45:51.240> impacting<00:45:51.880> this<00:45:52.480
• :45:54.079> that's<00:45:54.200> a<00:45:54.359> very<00:45:54.720> uh thank
• <00:45:55.559> we'll<00:45:55.800> get<00:45:56.400> we'll<00:45:56.559>
• 45:03.360> on<01:45:04.119> the<01:45:05.119> pamur<01:45:05.800> gate<01
• <01:45:08.679> where<01:45:09.159> uh<01:45:09.639> I<01:45:09.760> can't

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee reviewed the Department of Corrections budget, with the chair initially noting that the overall numbers looked close to fiscal year 2024 spending, except for federal funds. Department officials explained that prior ARPA expenditures and delayed revenue recognition had distorted the comparison, and that the corrected general fund spend was about $169.7 million. Members then focused on whether the budget’s staffing assumptions were realistic, especially the shift from overtime to full-time lines and the use of vacant positions to offset overtime costs. The department said it is leaning on vacancy savings, but would return for additional appropriations if unforeseen staffing problems arise. A major portion of the discussion centered on recruitment, retention, and staffing levels. Officials reported a 42% vacancy rate in enforcement ranks, down from 51% in January 2023, with 28 new officers headed to the next academy and 33 new hires already tracked. They said overtime is more expensive than regular staffing because of benefits and that it takes about 11 months for a new hire to break even. Members also asked about the split between incarcerated and supervised populations; the department said it oversees about 1,970 inmates in facilities and just over 4,000 people in the community, with 77 positions supervising the community population and the inmate population remaining the most expensive area. The committee also discussed how sentencing and statutory changes affect incarceration levels, including misdemeanor/felony thresholds and theft thresholds, with the department agreeing that such changes can significantly affect prison and jail populations. Members asked about education and recidivism, and the department said base education is the most important foundation, followed by vocational training, while noting that many incarcerated men lack a high school diploma. The department also described a $1.3 million reduction in contracted forensic evaluation services, explaining that these evaluations are court-ordered competency assessments and are not statutorily required to be provided by DOC. Finally, members reviewed victim services funding and staffing, including VOCA-supported positions, and the department explained that a new victim witness specialist would help support survivors at parole hearings and safety planning.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:45:01.839> this<00:45:02.160> same<00:45:02.480> type<00:45:02.640> of
• We work very<00:45:08.880> closely<00:45:09.280> together<00:45:09.760> on<00:45
• If<00:45:20.960> we<00:45:21.119> jump<00:45:21.280> to<00:45:21.440> the
• They have a a<00:45:46.800> very<00:45:47.040> good<00:45:47.280> presence<00:45
• If<00:45:56.079> you<00:45:56.240> move<00:45:56.400> to<00:45:56.560> the

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:45:02.280> I<00:45:02.359> have<00:45:02.480> lots<00:45:02.720> of
• > to<00:45:04.440> cut<00:45:04.600> me<00:45:04.720> off<00:45:04.960>
• <00:45:05.960> Um<00:45:06.520> so,<00:45:06.880> my<00:45:07.080> first<
• <00:45:47.800> And<00:45:47.920> when<00:45:48.080> I<00:45:48.160> went<
• > to<00:45:50.800> get<00:45:51.080> into<00:45:51.480> this<00:45:51.760

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:45:20.359> to<00:45:21.359> well<00:45:21.800> pumps<00:45:22.200> and
• <00:45:23.960> to<00:45:24.800> uh<00:45:25.040> that<00:45:25.240> are
• > they<00:45:28.280> ought<00:45:28.480> to<00:45:28.880> be<00:45:29.880
• <00:45:34.119> matter<00:45:34.359> of<00:45:34.599> fact<00:45:35.079> one
• thought<00:45:58.359> that<00:45:58.920> it<00:45:59.119> it<00:45:59.240><

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And while<01:45:08.639> I<01:45:08.880> don't<01:45:09.040> have<01:45:09.199>
• Instead,<01:45:23.920> this<01:45:24.159> bill<01:45:24.800> is<01:45:25.119>
• Families<01:45:49.280> who<01:45:49.520> rely<01:45:49.840> on<01:45:50.080>
• .<01:45:56.239> And<01:45:56.400> I<01:45:56.639> will<01:45:56.719> add<
• :45:52.400> and<05:45:52.638> I<05:45:52.718> I<05:45:52.958> don't<05:45

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This would be an opportunity for us to try to get some people to stay at 50 or 55 rather than 40 or 45
• It's replacing line 308 on page 11 with the following: "Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to
• I've got another amendment that basically states that if you were covered, which is 45 CFR Parts 16 through
• Covered, which is 45 CFR Parts 16 through 164, that's HIPAA.

Bills: SB210, SB176, SB167, SB244, SB218, SB9, SB153, SB9

Keywords: hospital liens, medical billing, government healthcare, insurance claims, patient rights, controlled substances, unlawful distribution, marijuana, violent offense, sentencing guidelines, criminal justice, aggravated theft, employee benefits, retirement funds, criminal penalty, state law, overdose, failure to render aid, public health, Alabama Athletic Commission

Transcript Highlights:

• >> Any<00:45:36.880> questions<00:45:37.280> from<00:45:37.440> the<00:45:
• I<00:45:42.240> think<00:45:42.400> you've<00:45:42.640> interpreted<00:45:
• So<00:45:45.280> the<00:45:45.599> the<00:45:46.000> landing<00:45:46.480> spot
• Returning to<01:45:01.360> footnote<01:45:01.840> number<01:45:02.080> one<01:45
• <02:45:10.240> And<02:45:10.960> Miss<02:45:11.520> Vaughn,<02:45:11.920>

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They want to instruct states to remove Minnesota voters from that file within 45 days, which no federal
• 47.279> within Minnesota voters from that file within Minnesota voters from that file within 45
• days, which no n federal government 45 days, which no n federal government has<00:13:51.680> ever
• <02:28:17.359> Speaker,<02:28:17.680> advice under chapter 211b. Mr.
• Speaker, advice under chapter 211b. Mr.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: House File 4240, an elections administration bill, was introduced as a package of updates to absentee voting, statewide voter registration system use, early voting procedures, recordkeeping, removal of outdated statutory language, and reimbursement for municipalities and counties that administer certain special elections. The author, Rep. Freiberg, described the bill as a modernization and efficiency measure that would clarify procedures while maintaining election security. Several amendments were adopted. The A4 amendment, offered by Rep. Freiberg, was described as aligning language with the Senate and passed without objection. The A6 amendment, offered by Rep. Cosnik, would give school districts more direction on polling locations for special elections in multi-county districts; Rep. Lee raised concerns that it could affect many districts statewide and questioned whether it applied to early voting, while Rep. Cosnik said it was narrowly tailored and intended to prevent disenfranchisement. Rep. Freiberg and Rep. Lee both said they would support it as a voter-access measure despite possible costs, and it was adopted. The A5 amendment, offered by Rep. Schultz, would require the Secretary of State to provide voter information to the U.S. Department of Justice upon request for civil-rights and federal voting-law enforcement; it was debated at length, with supporters framing it as election integrity and opponents arguing it would jeopardize voter privacy and could be used by the Trump administration to pressure Minnesota. The amendment was adopted after a roll call request. The debate on A5 was especially contentious, with Republicans arguing the state should cooperate with federal efforts to clean voter rolls and Democrats arguing the DOJ had overreached, mishandled civil-rights investigations, and sought voter data without a lawful need. Members on both sides cited voter fraud, privacy, and federal-state election authority, and several speakers referenced recent DOJ actions and court disputes. The transcript ends during further discussion of the federal role in elections, with no final disposition on the underlying bill shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• opportunity for<00:45:11.359> what's<00:45:11.599> called<00:45:11.760> a<00:45
• <00:45:19.040> the<00:45:19.280> notice<00:45:19.599> of<00:45:19.760> an
• <00:45:21.040> a<00:45:21.280> better<00:45:21.599> chance<00:45:21.920> for<
• Tuler<00:45:32.480> drill<00:45:32.720> is<00:45:32.880> a<00:45:33.040> very
• <00:45:33.280> famous<00:45:33.760> case<00:45:34.880> and<00:45:35.119>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• :45:37.560> one,<00:45:37.760> two,<00:45:37.880> and<00:45:37.960> three
• <00:45:40.720> to<00:45:41.000> or<00:45:41.240> something<00:45:41.600> else
• leading into<00:45:42.240> it,<00:45:42.359> so<00:45:42.480> maybe<00:45:42.720
• So,<01:45:06.440> Senator<01:45:06.760> Clark,<01:45:07.080> I<01:45:07.320
• Um Um Um might<01:45:15.720> be<01:45:15.840> three<01:45:16.080> hundred<01:45:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's what the legislature in Chapter 36 said it was intended to be.
• Are there problems in Chapter 36 we need to fix?
• Do we have a problem with groundwater districts not following what you put in Chapter 36?
• In Chapter 36, you use it. What detail do we need to put in it?
• If we build every single surface reservoir, acre-feet in the next 45 years.

Summary: The committee held a hearing on high-capacity groundwater wells proposed in Anderson, Henderson, and Houston counties, with members framing the issue as one of local water supply, fairness, and the need to modernize groundwater law while protecting private property rights. Opening remarks focused on the scale of the proposed Redtown Ranch and Pine Bliss projects, the potential export of tens of thousands of acre-feet of groundwater annually, and concerns that the applications lacked sufficient technical detail and could harm nearby landowners, cities, agriculture, and manufacturing. Members also noted the broader context of the recent flooding tragedy in central Texas and the Legislature’s intent to address water-related loss of life in the upcoming special session. Witnesses from the Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts and the Texas Water Development Board explained the current groundwater management framework. They described groundwater conservation districts as the state’s preferred management method, the role of groundwater management areas and desired future conditions, and how the Water Development Board uses those conditions to calculate modeled available groundwater. They emphasized that districts rely on local data, monitoring wells, and planning processes, but that information is often more limited in areas without a district, where the rule of capture applies. Members pressed witnesses on recharge rates, export permits, subsidence, the effect of pumping on nearby wells, the age and real-time availability of model data, and whether the proposed project would exceed modeled available groundwater in some counties. TCEQ explained its limited oversight role over groundwater conservation districts, including inquiries, compliance actions, and, in extreme cases, dissolution authority. Water Development Board staff also outlined funding programs, saying the New Water Supply for Texas Fund is limited to projects such as brackish desalination, reuse, ASR, and other new-supply projects, and does not fund fresh groundwater exports alone. They said the project at issue had not applied for board funding. A water lawyer then testified on the rule of capture, ownership in place, and district regulation, arguing that districts must use permitting and other tools to manage production within modeled available groundwater and that the Legislature could consider additional authority over groundwater exports under current law.

Transcript Highlights:

• /c><01:45:35.760> know<01:45:36.240> where<01:45:36.480> to<01:45:36.600> go<
• and what<01:45:37.040> to<01:45:37.160> do<01:45:37.440> is<01:45:37.640> just
• <01:45:38.040> so<01:45:38.240> important.
• So, thank<01:45:39.160> you<01:45:39.240> so<01:45:39.360> much.
• Any<01:45:42.560> other<01:45:42.920> member<01:45:43.360> questions<01:45:43.840

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• you<00:45:49.440> do<00:45:50.000> it's<00:45:50.200> actually<00:45:50.440
• and cheaper<00:45:52.200> and<00:45:52.359> so<00:45:52.680> unfortunately<00:45
• in your budget<00:45:53.599> you're<00:45:53.680> going<00:45:53.800> have<00:45
• :45:56.240> and<00:45:56.319> if<00:45:56.400> you<00:45:56.480> don't<00
• /c><00:45:57.960> cost<00:45:58.160> more<00:45:58.400> and<00:45:58.520> be<

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2893 having received 45 'aye' votes and zero 'nay' votes. I declare it to have passed.
• Haven't received 45 'ayes' in one 'a' I declare House Bill 3322 to have passed.
• Haven't received 45 'i's and zero 'nays.' I declare House Bill 3472 to have passed. Mr.
• House Bill 4303 having received 45 votes and zero nay votes, I declare it to have Passed.
• Members, the Senate Technology and Telecommunications meeting will be at 8:45 tomorrow, 8:45 bright and

Bills: SR31, SB2060, SB2184, HB1371, HB1411, HB1933, HB2361, HB2398, HB2893, HB3006, HB3044, HB3127, HB3322, HB3147, HB1276, HB3472, HB3522, HB3704, HB4303, HB4319

Keywords: military, children, resilience, Purple Up!, military families, master development district, improvement district, public improvements, infrastructure financing, special assessments, statutory revision, consolidation, law amendment, emergency legislation, legal clarity, oil and gas, mineral rights, proceeds, royalties, escrow account