Video & Transcript Research : 'data mapping'

Page 148 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/20/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • data data request is filing fee for a data data request is obviously<00:10:36.800> a<00:10:36.920
  • And so even if you're using non-identifiable aggregate data, of what value is that aggregate data to
  • And so even if you're using non-identifiable aggregate data, of what value is that aggregate data to
  • Um, and that was, um, language around, um, like only aggregate data, no private confidential data, no
  • non-investigative data.
Bills: HF414, HF768, HF359
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Elections Committee Aug 19th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • And as people have said over and over again, 76% of that map is baked into this map.
  • , we don't like these maps.
  • Who specifically drew these maps? So these are the legislators' maps. The legislature's maps.
  • So I'm asking who drew these maps, not general groups. The legislature drew the maps.
  • Last week, you saw the maps.
Summary: The Assembly Elections Committee met on August 19, 2025, to consider ACA 8, SB 280, and an informational hearing on AB 604. The meeting began with several failed motions to adjourn, to read public comments into the record, and to recess so members could review the roughly 16,000 public comments submitted through the committee portal. The chair emphasized the hearing’s expedited format, transparency measures, and rules limiting witness testimony, and noted a letter from Speaker Rivas authorizing Assemblymember Berman to present ACA 8. ACA 8, described by supporters as the “Election Rigging Response Act,” would place before voters a temporary congressional redistricting plan tied to AB 604 and triggered only if another state, especially Texas, adopts a partisan mid-decade redistricting. Supporters, including Assemblymember Berman, labor groups, CTA, Planned Parenthood affiliates, SEIU, and other allied organizations, argued the measure was a response to partisan gerrymandering elsewhere and a defense of democracy, with voters having the final say in a November 4, 2025 special election. Opponents, including current and former redistricting commissioners, good-government groups, business and taxpayer organizations, and many members of the public, argued the proposal undermines California’s independent redistricting model, was rushed without adequate public review, could cost roughly $200 million or more, and would invite litigation and partisan manipulation. The committee also debated a proposed amendment that would bar legislators who voted for ACA 8 from later running for Congress in districts adopted under the measure. After extended procedural disputes, the committee voted to lay the amendment on the table. The hearing then continued with extensive public testimony, overwhelmingly divided between strong support and strong opposition, but the transcript provided does not show a final committee vote on ACA 8 or SB 280 before the excerpt ends.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other thing I would mention, going back to the map—the very first map that you mentioned on... ..
  • .the very first map that you mentioned on that.
  • These are the active... the map just showing, of course... ...the map just showing, of course, the active
  • The report that we now have two years of real data.
  • I love data, as Senator... knows. I love data, as Senator knows.
Keywords: 924, joint, all
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We do not have any maps before us. No maps have been proposed or presented to the committee.
  • This is according to the census report and U.S. data.
  • I have not looked at any racial data, and we drew these maps race blind during a legislative hearing.
  • We deserve better than maps drawn to protect power.
  • We need your help, not partisan map games.
Keywords: 1185, senate, all