Video & Transcript : 'Section 94B' :
Page 146 of 500
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- So looking at, I think it's section 150, subsection 2, then the Idaho... ...section 150, subsection 2
- It's section 14.014.10. F and G have been stricken.
- Also on page 24, similarly, some sections in subsection 10A, some...
- We also have removed a number of sections on pages 59 through 60.
- I can find that section if needed if we'd like to refer to that.
AL
Transcript Highlights:
- 17-3-30.1, it states that they previously lost the right pursuant to that first section, and then you
- meet one of the criteria in section 15-22-36.1A. ...you meet one of the criteria in the code of 15.
- And so I don't have that other section with me. Um, but I was going to ask you... With me.
- And that's the section that they did take...
- That's the section that they did take out because it had "prior to October 1, 2025."
Keywords:
resisting arrest, penalties, criminal justice, law enforcement, public safety, youthful offender, capital murder, victims' rights, immunity, civil liability, use of force, recruitment, illegal alien, enhanced sentencing, criminal offenses, minor victims, felonies, Alabama legislature, bail reform, cash deposit
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
House - Appropriations and Finance Mar 20th, 2025
House Appropriations & Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, to what you sent over in terms of format of section 45, in, in the back of the bill.
- And then there's a series of spreadsheets that you can see what's changing in section 4.
- It just moved from one section of the bill to another.
- So if you look in section 5, you'll see 3 million for the capacity.
- Oh, it was in, it's under DOH and Charles is looking up that section.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, June 30, 2026)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Section 3.
- Section 4 during consideration Section 4.
- Section 5.
- Section 6. At any time after Section 6.
- Section 12. Upon adoption of this... Section 12.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> missed deleting the sections out in HB1. missed deleting the sections out in HB1.
- This is to delete sections 254 relative to travel and tourism and section 255 relative to the welcome
- So, we're going to section one, section two.
- </c><01:00:26.960><c> We're</c> going to section one, section two.
- We're going to section one, section two.
AK
Alaska 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session Jun 20th, 2026 at 10:00 am
Alaska House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- A message dated June 19 at 9:37 a.m. stating that, under the authority of Article 2, Section 9 and Article
- 3, Section 17 of the Constitution of the State of Alaska, and in the public interest, the Governor caused
- 3, Section 17 of the Constitution of the State of Alaska... ...of Article 2, Section 9 and Article 3
- , Section 17 of the Constitution of the State of Alaska, and in the public interest, the Governor hereby
- 9 and Article 3, Section 17 of the Constitution of the State of Alaska, and in the public interest,
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor and Transportation May 28th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- The second section that we have for Part A are items number 6, 12 through 16, 22, 23, 27, 29, 31, 40,
- We will now move to the third section of Part B.
- We'll now move to the third and final section, which is transportation.
- The issues under the transportation section are 3, 4, 6 through 11, 16 through 19, 21, 23, 27 through
- Our final section in Part C of transportation will cover three issues: 5, 22, and 53. 33.
Summary:
The Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections, Public Safety, Judiciary, Labor, and Transportation met with a quorum present and took up a vote-only agenda on a large set of budget issues across corrections, public safety, judiciary, labor, and transportation. One public commenter, Edward Hasbrook of the Identity Project, opposed the DMV state-to-state Real ID proposal, arguing that uploading driver data to the AMVA/Spex database would expose Californians’ information to federal and out-of-state access and should be removed from the budget for fuller consideration.
The committee then voted on multiple grouped items in Part A, Part B, and Part C, generally adopting staff recommendations. Most votes passed with either unanimous support or two-to-one margins, with Senator Seyarto occasionally voting no or not voting. The actions were described as reflecting the Senate’s budget plan and were intended to be folded into the broader budget agreement.
In closing comments, the chair and members highlighted several issues they want to continue pursuing in negotiations, including privacy and security concerns with the Real ID state-to-state system, rehabilitation and reentry programming, workforce training, and expansion of the Wildfire Mitigation Grant Program. Senator DeRazzo also emphasized support for justice-system programs, public defenders, trauma recovery centers, and workforce initiatives, while Senator Seyarto stressed transportation funding, court capacity for Prop. 36 implementation, and broader workforce and business development. The chair thanked public participants, staff, consultants, sergeants, and the Department of Finance and LAO, and the subcommittee adjourned.
FL
Florida 2026 Regular Session
FL House Floor Session - 2026-04-28 (12:00PM Session)
Florida House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- To the Honorable Members of the Florida Senate and House of Representatives: Whereas Article 3, Section
- Governor of the State of Florida, by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by Article 3, Section
- 3(c)(1) of the Florida Constitution, do hereby proclaim as follows: Section 1.
- Section 1. The proclamation on January 7, 2026. Hereby proclaim as follows: Section 1.
- Section 2.
NY
New York 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Energy and Telecommunications - 03/24/2026
Energy And Telecommunications
Transcript Highlights:
- Section 71 of the Public Service Law says, upon the complaint in writing of not less than 25 customers
- That's not what Section 71 says, Chairman.
- Section 71 says they shall have an investigation of 25 customers in writing.
- The current bill on page 2, line 4 and 5, shall include such proceedings conducted pursuant to Section
- You're looking at Section 71 of the chapter, which says if 25 customers... ...you're looking at Section
Summary:
The Senate Standing Committee on Energy and Telecommunications, chaired by Senator Cameron Parker, considered a large agenda focused on utility consumer protections, rate transparency, NYSERDA oversight, and energy transition policy. Several bills were discussed in detail, including measures to prohibit residential utility shutoffs during extreme temperature forecasts (Bill 120A), delay shutoffs and late fees while a utility is under certain PSC investigations (Bill 904B), require disclosure of planned rate increases (Bill 4989A), limit certain utility charges after 12 months (Bill 8710), and require utilities to disclose more information with major rate change applications (Bill 9433A). The committee also considered bills on net energy metering credits (Bill 1553), reconnection for low-income customers (Bill 965), sanctions and civil penalties (Bill 8908), and annual NYSERDA reporting obligations (Bill 1819).
Members raised recurring concerns about affordability, arrears, and who ultimately bears costs when utilities are prevented from collecting immediately. Senator Walczyk repeatedly questioned whether protections would shift costs to other ratepayers, while sponsors and the chair emphasized that the bills did not erase arrears but created temporary consumer protections. Senator May noted that some proposals could produce significant savings for ratepayers. On Bill 1819, Senator Walczyk supported greater accountability for NYSERDA’s use of ratepayer-funded money. Bill 1668, which would authorize NYSERDA to administer grants for switching residents to electric heat pumps, drew questions about funding; staff said it would be funded off-budget from existing sources and would have no direct state cost, though it could require shifting existing program resources.
The committee advanced most bills to third reading after motions and votes, with several measures receiving no votes but still moving forward. Bill 2477 was held for possible amendments. Bill 4989A was referred to the Consumer Protection Committee. Bill 5111, the Just Energy Transition Act, prompted extended discussion about its study timeline and a PSC order to facilitate replacement and redevelopment of at least 4 gigawatts of fossil fuel generation; the bill was advanced to third reading after debate. The meeting concluded with adjournment after the committee completed its agenda.
MS
Mississippi 2026 Regular Session
Highways and Transportation - Room 216, 25 February, 2026; 2:00 PM
Highways and Transportation
Transcript Highlights:
- And it tells you in section one that it's spread upon—let me see—requesting that is provide indicating
- The segment it's in section two.
- </c><00:02:24.000><c> tells</c><00:02:24.160><c> you</c><00:02:24.319><c> in</c><00:02:24.560><c> section
- </c><00:02:25.040><c> one</c> And it tells you in section one And it tells you in section one that<00
- </c> the segment it's in section two. Yeah. the segment it's in section two. Yeah.
MS
Mississippi 2026 Regular Session
Judiciary, Division A - Room 216, 17 February, 2026; 10:45 AM
Judiciary, Division A
Transcript Highlights:
- Section 2 allowed for a judgeship, and I’ll explain it this way.
- Uh, in Section 2, it says qualifying by February 2nd. However, that date’s already passed.
- Um, and that’s the other sections are the sections that were from the bill from last year.
- So there’s bound and there’s moving parts from a map to the code sections to all of that.
- So honestly, to sections to all of that.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- And then on page two, if you go down to line 30, there is a new section 67-300-3008A, which is adding
- to go through the sections of the bill real quick so you can look at it and follow along on what it
- So section one, we talk about the legislative intent, and the one thing I'll note in there is we wanted
- So section one, we talk about the legislative intent, and the one thing I'll note in there is we wanted
- I'm just going to go through the sections of the bill real quick so you can look at it and follow along
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Civil Rights & Judiciary Jan 13th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- introducing the bill, and I have shared with the AOC, who brought the bill to me, specifically in Section
- Specifically in Section 6, as you've heard staff brief, that section extends the deadline of a piece
- I do want to take a brief moment to explain the rationale for the change in Section 6.
- I'm here solely to address Section 6 and to express our disappointment in Section 6, which would authorize
- This is not directed at her personally, but we were just disappointed to see that section.
Summary:
The Civil Rights and Judiciary Committee heard House Bill 2158, which updates Washington’s electronic notarization laws to reflect 2021 changes to the Uniform Law Commission’s notarial act model. Staff explained that the bill would allow remote notarization of tangible paper documents, authorize remote administration of oaths or affirmations to remotely located individuals, and clarify how a notary can acknowledge a signature on a tangible record sent in from a remote signer. Representative Abel, the sponsor, said the measure would improve access, especially in rural areas where notaries may be far away. Testimony from the Uniform Law Commission supported the bill as a modest update that adds flexibility while maintaining consumer protections. A committee member raised concerns about fraud and manipulated video, and the witness responded that the bill includes safeguards such as required recordings, identity verification, and retention of audiovisual records.
The committee then heard House Bill 2178, an Administrative Office of the Courts request bill making several mostly technical changes to align statutes with court rules and current practice. Staff described changes to civil infraction filing and response deadlines, payment plans for infractions, the dollar threshold for aggregated malicious mischief damage, a two-year extension for courts of limited jurisdiction to implement electronic protection-order filing, and repeal of an outdated statutory grant-distribution provision. Representative Tye noted concern specifically about the extension in Section 6 and said she was still seeking an explanation for why the deadline should move from 2026 to 2028. AOC witness Jay Lee Schultz said the extension is needed to align with the rollout of the state’s new case management system and to support statewide electronic protection-order tracking.
Elizabeth Hendren of the Sexual Violence Law Center testified in opposition to Section 6, saying the delay would further postpone reforms intended to improve access to protection orders, judicial access to related orders, and survivor notifications. She argued that the legislature had already given the courts five years to implement the changes and asked for more transparency about funding, barriers, and why additional time is needed. After hearing the testimony, the committee concluded its business for the day and also took time to introduce members and staff.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Article 3, Sections 10 and 11. Section 10 actually talks about the quorum.
- Section 11 actually talks about... Punishments that can be applied.
- Sure, I don't disagree that there's a section on punishments.
- It's page four, Section A of that ruling from 2021 where they say that the Texas Constitution enables
- Page 2, section B says you can't use campaign dollars for items such as travel, food, lodging.
Bills:
HB18
Keywords:
HB 18, Texas Legislature, quorum break, quorum-busting, legislative walkout, absent legislators, political contributions, campaign finance, political expenditures, legislative caucus, specific-purpose committee, Texas Ethics Commission, civil penalty, show cause order, district court, Fifteenth Court of Appeals, session fundraising, travel lodging food expenses, legislative session, compelled attendance
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- House Bill 2112, amending Section 283, Article 12 of ARS by adding Section 28-247.40, relating to special
- House Bill 2158, amending Section 17-101, A.R.S., relating to Game and Fish.
- Amending section 17 101 A.R.S. relating to Game and Fish.
- House Bill 2205, amending Section 13-1604, A.R.S., relating to criminal penalties.
- and Section 37-281, relating to the lease of state lands.
Summary:
The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, attendance, guest introductions, and several ceremonial proclamations, including recognition of Dr. Joseph Torkelson for his service in pediatric oncology and military medicine. Members also introduced guests connected to Arizona Bleeding Disorders, charter schools, and a suicide-prevention effort tied to HB 2665 (“Cade’s Law”). The chamber then moved through multiple Committee of the Whole calendars, considering a large number of bills and resolutions.
On the first calendar, the House gave do pass recommendations, mostly as amended, to HB 2117, 2744, 2751, 2917, 2939, 2957, 2970, and HCR 2038. The amendments addressed topics such as natural resource conservation district boundaries, manufacturing and jobs, Real ID/non-Real ID data privacy, and Colorado River conservation and tribal/community representation. The House then adopted the Committee of the Whole report and sent the measures for engrossing; a later motion to amend the report to include the defeated Villegas amendment on HB 2667 failed by roll call vote, 22-32 with 6 not voting.
In the next calendars, the House advanced HB 2015, 2129, 2327, 2439, 2533, 2667, 2793, 2873, HCR 2044, and others, with several floor or committee amendments adopted. Debate focused on homelessness coordination in HB 2533, homebuyer assistance and corporate ownership concerns in HB 2667, annexation and local control in HB 2793, and a proposed constitutional referral in HCR 2044 aimed at closing loopholes for discrimination in public programs. The House also considered HB 2044 and HB 2076 in the Judiciary calendar, with debate over the scope of a homicide-disposal statute in HB 2044 and school safety/teacher firearms issues in HB 2076; both bills advanced as amended.
The final calendar covered natural resources, energy, and water bills. The House advanced HB 2014, 2055, 2145, 2185, 2267, 2340, 2428, 2696, 2798, 2955, 2975, and 2986, with amendments on drought definitions, emissions permitting, mineral district mapping, and environmental enforcement authority. HB 2267 drew the sharpest debate, with opponents arguing it would hinder solar and wind development and supporters arguing for diversification toward coal, gas, and nuclear; after a division vote, the bill still received a do pass recommendation. The session concluded with the Committee of the Whole rising and reporting, and the House adopting the report and assigning the measures accordingly.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Health Finance and Policy Committee 4/2/25 - Part 2
Health Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Sections two and three are the base bill that's being amended.
- Sections two and three are um performed.
- :21:25.520><c> on</c><00:21:26.240><c> environmental</c> um two sections on environmental um two sections
- Article one, section laboratories.
- Article 1, section six is year.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
CPC Public Hearing- Wed Feb 5, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST
Consumer Protection & Commerce
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:49:57.480><c> 8</c> followup question so regarding Section 8 followup question so regarding Section
- collected from Section 8 applicants?
- collected from Section 8 applicants?
- 8, or with the counties, which also run the Section 8 program.
- Our proposed amendment for consideration is to add section H.
Summary:
The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on February 5, 2025, and heard testimony on several bills. HB 918, relating to labeling, drew support from the Department of Health, INDA (the nonwoven fabrics industry), and Hawaii Realtors. INDA said the bill aligns with do-not-flush labeling laws in other states but raised a concern about the six-month compliance deadline tied to FIFRA approval. In response to committee questions, witnesses explained that the bill is aimed mainly at disinfecting wipes, that most products are already labeled nationally, and that the proposed timing issue could be addressed by using Oregon’s approach. No vote was taken on the measure during the portion shown.
The committee also heard HB 1482, relating to controlled substances. HPD supported the bill, and Aloha Green Holdings and the Department of Health both said they supported the intent but recommended technical amendments. Their testimony focused on clarifying the treatment of Delta-8 THC, distinguishing synthetic or artificially derived cannabinoids from naturally occurring forms, and avoiding confusion in the hemp law. Members asked whether Delta-8 would show up on drug tests; witnesses said it would test positive for THC and would not be distinguished from Delta-9. The bill was then set aside as the committee moved on.
HB 981, relating to attorney’s fees, drew opposition from a law firm representing homeowners and associations, which argued the bill would limit access to legal services, favor developers and contractors, and make settlement harder. The witness suggested instead using existing consumer-protection fee-shifting concepts, and committee members explored whether a capped fee award or a broader attorney-fee rule would be more appropriate. The committee then took up HB 807 and HB 336, both relating to condominiums. HB 807 received support from the Green Infrastructure Authority and the Hawaii Bankers Association, while one testifier urged deferral over unresolved questions about commercial PACE financing; the bank association asked for more time to work with HGIA, and the chair indicated decision-making could be deferred to allow that discussion. On HB 336, the Community Associations Institute opposed the bill as removing checks and balances, while the Hawaii Workers Center and others supported it as a step toward clearer enforcement of health and safety issues in condominiums and rental housing.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- the</c><00:54:12.840><c> bill</c> section two of the bill section two of the bill is<00:54:14.560><c
- Section<00:55:17.400><c> um</c> Section um Section um a<00:55:18.200><c> section</c><00:55:18.680><c>
- Um it was then real property section.
- And then<02:17:25.880><c> there</c><02:17:26.440><c> sections</c> then there sections then there sections
- </c><02:18:52.800><c> deal</c><02:18:53.000><c> with</c> Um Sections 23 and 24 deal with Um Sections
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
JHA Public Hearing - Fri Feb 13, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST
Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- States Code Section 1357G, States Code Section 1357G, or<00:10:19.680><c> any</c><00:10:19.839><c> other
- </c> >> What was the section again? I'm sorry. >> What was the section again?
- </c> United States code section 11101 A15U. United States code section 11101 A15U.
- Move the sentence from section 6 to section 5.
- We'll move the sentence from section 6 to section 5.
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1768, which would prohibit state and county law enforcement agencies and officials from entering into federal immigration-enforcement agreements under 8 U.S.C. 1357(g) and from assisting in certain immigration enforcement actions except in limited circumstances. The Office of the Public Defender, Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, the Legal Clinic, and the ACLU of Hawaiʻi all testified in strong support, arguing the bill would protect due process, reduce fear in immigrant communities, preserve trust in local police, and keep local resources focused on public safety. Testifiers said cooperation with immigration enforcement can chill court attendance, crime reporting, and cooperation with police, and they emphasized that the bill would not stop federal enforcement or affect other deputization agreements for environmental or other criminal matters. Committee members asked whether any 287(g) agreements currently exist in Hawaiʻi; testifiers said they were unaware of any and believed the bill would maintain the status quo. No vote was taken in the portion provided.
The committee then took up House Bill 1548, which would reduce the maximum sentence for misdemeanors from one year to 364 days and allow people previously sentenced to one year to seek sentence modification. The Office of the Public Defender, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Legal Clinic, the Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, the ACLU of Hawaiʻi, and the William S. Richardson School of Law immigration clinic all supported the measure, saying the one-day change could prevent severe immigration consequences such as detention, removal, and bars to relief that can be triggered by a sentence of 365 days or more. Testifiers stressed that the bill would not change criminal liability or public safety, but would align Hawaiʻi law with similar reforms adopted in other states. Members questioned whether the change would affect citizens or create an automatic immigration process; witnesses responded that the issue is the federal immigration consequence tied to the maximum sentence, not actual time served, and that citizens would not face that consequence. The transcript ends during continued discussion of HB 1548, with no final vote shown.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
HLT/HSH Joint Public Hearing - Wed Feb 4, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, and then uh there are a few sections, the new section E-J-Q and K, that um create new authorities
- </c> Um and then uh there are a few sections Um and then uh there are a few sections section<00:23:24.400
- section the new section E-J-Q and K that um<00:23:29.280><c> create</c><00:23:29.600><c> new</c><00:
- </c> section two, which is the section section two, which is the section relating<02:46:18.960><c> to
- </c> is that section was deleted. is that section was deleted.
Summary:
The joint hearing opened with House Bill 1969, which would provide state funding for colorectal cancer screenings for uninsured and underinsured residents. The Department of Human Services said it supports the goal of early screening but would need new administrative capacity, including a program manager and claim pre-screening, to run the program. The Department of Health supported the measure and cited low screening rates in Hawaii, noting an educational campaign to encourage screening. The Insurance Division raised concerns about reliance on federal FAQs, warning that guidance can change and may create state cost exposure. Supporters including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network and the Hawaii Medical Association argued the bill would close a preventive-care gap, reduce late-stage diagnoses, and save long-term costs; the committee also discussed implementation costs, estimated by DHS at roughly $1.4 million to $2 million annually plus administrative expenses, and a 6-month to 1-year timeline to establish the program.
The committee then took up House Bill 1965, which would require health carriers to spend at least 6% of total medical expenditures on primary care providers. The Insurance Division said several provisions raise technical and legal concerns, including the premium freeze, the medical loss ratio language, the lack of an existing external review process for downcoding claims, and a new mandate for medically necessary inter-island transportation that could trigger an ACA defrayal. The Department of Human Services supported the intent but suggested broader language to include primary care supports and services, and noted that QUEST integration plans already invested at least 9% of total medical expenditures in primary care in 2024, with additional spending on supports and low-value care reductions. State health planning officials strongly supported the bill as an investment in primary care, saying it could improve outcomes and lower long-term costs, though they acknowledged a possible temporary premium increase during the transition.
Testimony in support emphasized Hawaii’s physician shortage, especially on Maui, the Big Island, and other neighbor islands, and warned that clinics are under financial strain and may close without higher primary care reimbursement. The Hawaii Healthcare Task Force, AARP Hawaii, and other supporters said the bill would help retain providers, improve access for Medicare and Medicaid patients, and prevent downstream costs from emergency room use and avoidable hospitalizations. No votes or final committee action were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.