Transcript Highlights:

• and that work includes which facilities and that work includes which also<00:23:49.039> benefits<
• that um we need to do facilities that um we need to do plumbing<00:24:15.600> repairs,<00:24:
• <00:25:04.559> improvement operations, facility improvement operations, facility improvement
• So, I do want to clarify that when a cruise ship uses one of our facilities, they are already paying
• , they are already paying a facilities, they are already paying a port<00:28:58.880> entry<00:

Bills: SB2816

Keywords: enterprise zones, economic development, innovation enterprise, job creation, Hawaii, 910, house, all

Summary: The committees heard House Bill 2195, HD1, which would replace the existing transit accommodations tax on cruise ships with a per-passenger infrastructure fee collected by the Department of Transportation and deposited into a new cruise ship special fund. Testimony included support from Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings and comments from the Tax Foundation of Hawaii warning that the bill should remain narrowly tied to harbor-related uses to avoid potential Tonnage Clause issues. The Department of Transportation testified that cruise-related harbor work includes pier repairs, dredging, terminal upgrades, and shore power, and said a dedicated revenue stream would help prioritize cruise infrastructure needs. The Attorney General’s office said it had submitted written comments but did not address questions about the litigation or constitutional background. Members questioned whether the new special fund was necessary when the existing harbor special fund already finances similar improvements. DOT said the funds overlap and suggested the bill could be amended to use the harbor special fund with a separate cruise subaccount, while still preserving a dedicated revenue stream and separate accounting. DOT also said it currently collects port entry, dockage, and per-head passenger fees from cruise ships and that existing cruise-related expenditures from the harbor special fund have not been challenged. The chair ultimately recommended moving HB 2195 forward as introduced, while continuing discussions about the fund structure and awaiting further clarity from the Attorney General and DOT. In decision-making, the committees voted to pass HB 2195, HD1, as is. They also voted to pass House Bill 916, HD1, relating to the low-income housing tax credit, which would allow certain state low-income housing tax credits to offset state transient accommodations taxes in the same county and make Act 129 of 2016 permanent. Both the Committee on Tourism and the Committee on Economic Development and Technology adopted the chair’s recommendation to pass HB 916, HD1, unamended. The hearing was then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• SO I HAVE A GREAT POSITION AND IF WE LOOK AT OUR TESTING FACILITY AND WE HAVE ...
• I WAS ONCE PROHIBITED FROM BEING IN THE FACILITY THAT I WAS SUPPOSEDLY IN CHARGE OF.
• WE JUST LAUNCHED A NEW FACILITY, A NEW 40,000 SQUARE-FOOT FACILITY, FIRST OF ITS KIND IN THIS REGION
• ALSO THIS PAST YEAR ANNOUNCED A 44,000 SQUARE-FOOT FACILITY, EXPANSION AT THE FACILITY IN TALLAHASSEE
• INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JUST ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE HPMI FACILITY SO ABLE TO LEVERAGE THAT TO

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In essence, the Minnesota Health and Education Facilities Authority (M.H.E.F.A.) is here today to ask
• I think it's a good idea, but I believe it should be limited to hospitals or medical facilities.
• that... ...is required to have a license, whether it's hospitals or assisted living facilities.
• The health care facility will have to have a license, as far as I understand. Further discussion?
• By law to operate that facility. I personally would like to see it tighter myself. Thank you.

Transcript Highlights:

• the nursing facility? Will they pass? the nursing facility? Will they pass?
• facilities as well.
• nursing facilities.
• or 76 nursing facilities. or 76 nursing facilities.
• major solid waste facilities. major solid waste facilities.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Minnesota higher education facilities Minnesota higher education facilities Authority<00:47:04.640>
• <00:52:35.160> I section defining healthc Care Facility I section defining healthc Care Facility
• <00:52:39.040> and see anything about dental facilities and see anything about dental facilities
• <00:53:15.480> within this applies to um facilities within this applies to um facilities within
• We have done auditorium facilities for those schools. We have done dormitories.

Bills: HF2371, HF2147, HF2557, HF1165, HF2466, HF2465, HF2482

Keywords: informed consent, sensitive examinations, healthcare, patient rights, anesthesia, hot water pools, rental properties, public health, safety regulations, Minnesota Statutes, health care access, hospital surcharge, fund allocation, medical assistance, health funding, health care, education, bonding capacity, financing, Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority

Transcript Highlights:

• . facilities. facilities.
• residents of assisted living facilities. residents of assisted living facilities.
• staff of assisted living facilities. staff of assisted living facilities.
• long-term care facilities long-term care facilities uh<00:34:57.760> to<00:34:57.960>
• assisted living facilities assisted living facilities by<00:40:02.280> for<00:40:02.520><

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Trauma and facility, trauma facility and EMS.
• We had $10 million in there in HB1 for a facility in Brazoria County.
• So for all the facilities we have across the state of Texas.
• But, does the state need to own and operate facilities?
• I would love not to have any wait time for any in a facility.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The data constructing their facility.
• to come in and invest in that facility to come in and invest in that facility like<00:36:45.520>
• We have is an enrichment facility.
• of electricity that these facilities of electricity that these facilities need?
• incorporating any of the old facilities incorporating any of the old facilities and<01:08:54.799

Keywords: Meeting Start - 00:00 Roll Call – 00:15 Approval of Minutes of the July 15, 2025, Meeting 00:55 Helping Power Kentucky’s Growth – 01:25 Powering and Deploying AI – 41:00 Fueling America’s Intelligence – 56:12 Adjournment – 01:10:37, 958, all

Summary: The Artificial Intelligence Task Force met with a quorum, adopted prior meeting minutes, and then focused on energy policy and economic development as they relate to AI and data centers. John Bevington of LG&E and KU, introduced by Caroline Clark of LG&E/KU and PPL, described the utility’s Kentucky-only service territory, vertically integrated system, 1.3 million customers, and about 7.5 gigawatts of generating capacity. He said the company has supported 76 Kentucky projects in 2024 totaling about $3 billion in announced investment and roughly 3,000 jobs, with a large share of statewide announcements occurring in its service area. Bevington said LG&E and KU’s current project pipeline is unusually strong, totaling about 170 projects and 8.5 gigawatts of requested power, with data centers accounting for about two-thirds of that demand. He broke the pipeline into existing customer expansions, new-to-Kentucky projects, and 20 data center projects representing about 5.6 gigawatts of potential load. He highlighted a Louisville data center project by PO Development Company and Powerhouse Data Centers that has announced a 400-megawatt facility and may expand to 525 megawatts, estimating that such a project could represent about $4 billion in investment. He also explained that large data centers generally must locate near transmission lines and that utilities must conduct studies, order long-lead equipment, and secure reimbursement commitments before proceeding so other customers are not harmed. Members asked about how Kentucky compares with other states, the size of data center projects, and whether regulatory reform is needed. Bevington said the 20 projects reflect current Kentucky interest, which he attributed in part to the state’s sales tax exemption for data centers, and noted that states like Ohio have had similar incentives for years. In response to questions from Senator Thomas, he confirmed that data centers can vary in size and said the state should have a regulatory environment that supports economic development, while emphasizing that the benefits would flow to the state, local communities, and schools rather than just the utility. He also cited national and regional data suggesting data centers generate indirect jobs and tax revenue, and said LG&E and KU are investing in transmission, reliability, solar, and gas generation projects, including proposed additional 645-megawatt natural gas units and other system upgrades, to meet expected demand.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:09:03.519> uh operate charitable Gaming facilities uh operate charitable Gaming facilities
• <00:48:51.400> would our 18 licens facilities and you would our 18 licens facilities and you
• I'm going to talk a little... walk into any other gaming facility and walk into any other gaming facility
• <01:04:55.359> would allow it online um the facilities would allow it online um the facilities
• 1,400 employees of these facilities 1,400 employees of these facilities right<01:09:42.960> now

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• facilities continues to be a challenge. facilities continues to be a challenge.
• ,<01:19:58.400> support structural facilities, support structural facilities, support facilities
• > for to thank facil our facilities office for to thank facil our facilities office for um<01:
• from receiving um facilities funding? from receiving um facilities funding?
• facilities funding? facilities funding?

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Enterprise real property facilities Enterprise real property facilities condition<00:33:46.840><
• that facility that facility unfortunately<00:36:59.520> it's<00:36:59.720> 30<00:37
• <00:48:55.799> so um this is a state-owned facility so um this is a state-owned facility so
• Beautiful facility.
• it is to maintain that facility.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Finally, Renew opposes the elimination of pumped storage hydropower facilities from the definitions of
• small and large clean energy storage facility.
• Eliminating existing resources from the definition of clean energy storage facilities renders existing
• storage facilities.
• reflect the realities of the environmental impacts of those facilities.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on a wide range of energy bills, with much of the discussion focused on offshore wind, battery storage, solar, nuclear study proposals, and a bill to redefine clean energy. Several Barnstable-area legislators and witnesses raised concerns about offshore wind transmission infrastructure near neighborhoods, beaches, and drinking water supplies, and supported bills to create a special commission and increase local input and oversight. In contrast, environmental, consumer, labor, and clean energy groups strongly backed offshore wind expansion bills, arguing that offshore wind lowers long-term costs, improves winter reliability, reduces fossil fuel dependence, supports jobs and local supply chains, and should include wildlife protections, labor standards, and community benefits. Some witnesses and committee members noted that parts of the offshore wind legislation overlap with the Governor’s energy affordability bill, and asked for clarification on which provisions were new versus duplicative. The committee also heard testimony on battery storage and solar legislation. Two student witnesses and several industry representatives supported a bill to study grid battery storage, saying storage can reduce outages, lower peak prices, and improve grid resilience during extreme weather. Witnesses from solar and storage companies supported a broader clean energy transition bill that would expand storage procurement, create a retail-style storage program for distributed batteries, set a 10-gigawatt solar target by 2035, and streamline siting and interconnection. Committee members pressed witnesses on whether these provisions were already included in the Governor’s affordability bill and asked for a section-by-section breakdown of what was new. One witness also urged allowing developers to bond interconnection payments to reduce financing costs. Another major topic was a bill defining clean energy, especially whether existing pumped-storage hydropower should qualify for subsidies or be excluded. Supporters of the bill argued that existing pumped storage should not receive additional ratepayer subsidies because it is already built, can have environmental impacts on rivers and ecosystems, and could cost ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars. Opponents said pumped storage is an important reliability resource and should remain eligible. The committee also heard testimony on nuclear-energy study bills: some witnesses supported creating a commission to examine nuclear power as a reliable, carbon-free option, while others opposed nuclear study bills and argued that nuclear is costly, unsafe, and inconsistent with the state’s clean energy goals. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• They are sort of functionally eligible or need the nursing facility level of care, but are able to be
• So the facilities don't know when we're coming, and that's to ensure the integrity of the process and
• 16 months is currently about 69% of our facilities.
• We're looking to our facilities with prior enforcement history.
• And then finally, our facilities that have multiple complaints.

Keywords: House Room C, General Assembly Building, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Each facility type was also capped at the amount that they could receive each year.
• Non-accredited facilities and organizations were capped at $75,000... ...per facility per fiscal year
• All right, so for 2025-2026 there were 61 parent organizations with 316 unique facilities.
• cap of $100,000, and then of the 210 non-accredited facilities, 23 reached the cap of $75,000.
• cap of 100,000 and then of the 210 non-accredited facilities, 23 reached the cap of 75,000.

Summary: The committee opened with roll call, welcomed members back for the first committee weeks, and heard brief personal updates from several senators before moving into agency implementation updates on recently enacted health care laws. The Agency for Health Care Administration reported on Senate Bill 64 creating rural emergency hospitals, explaining that AHCA adopted the required rules effective June 1, 2025, but that no hospitals have yet been designated. Members asked about possible hospital conversions, accreditation and survey responsibilities, and whether Florida would apply for federal rural health transformation funding; AHCA said it intends to apply and has already been working on the issue with federal officials. AHCA also reviewed the non-emergent care access plan requirement under Senate Bill 7016. The agency said hospitals with emergency departments must submit plans that help redirect non-emergent patients to appropriate care settings while complying with EMTALA, and that 83 plans had been received and 63 approved as of September 30. Members asked about data collection, managed care coordination, and the state’s health information exchange; AHCA said it has moved to a new HIE vendor and will continue monitoring implementation and possible care gaps. AHCA then updated the committee on the TEACH program, saying $6.8 million was spent in 2024-25 across 59 parent organizations and 229 facilities, with more than 1,800 students and nearly 380,000 clinical hours reimbursed. The agency said rulemaking is nearly complete, a new nursing student category and expanded facility eligibility were added, and a federal 1115 workforce waiver remains stalled after CMS signaled it will not approve new workforce demonstrations. AHCA also reviewed House Bill 121 on KidCare eligibility, explaining that implementation of the 300% poverty-level expansion remains blocked by federal litigation and waiver issues tied to premium nonpayment rules; members and public speakers urged action to close the coverage gap. Public testimony on AHCA’s presentation came from representatives of health centers and advocacy groups, who said the non-emergent care access plan has improved hospital-health center coordination and reduced repeat emergency use, and who urged implementation of KidCare expansion for children in the coverage gap. The Department of Health then presented updates on FRAM, the Sanadi screening grant program, the Health Care Innovation Revolving Loan Program, telehealth maternity care, swimming lesson vouchers, and House Bill 159 on pharmacist dispensing of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis. DOH reported strong participation in FRAM and the telehealth maternity program, 24 Sanadi grant awards in 42 counties, 4,945 swimming lesson vouchers issued last year and 2,371 so far this year, and three approved certification courses with five pharmacist certifications issued under HB 159. Committee members asked about recruitment of dentists and other providers, telehealth maternity outcomes, and why participation in the maternity program remains below expected levels; DOH said outreach and regional referral networks are expanding and more detailed outcome data will be included in the upcoming legislative report.

Transcript Highlights:

• I cannot move finished beer that is made at one facility to the other.
• Move product from a production facility to a non-production facility.
• It's from one facility to the next and the example that, uh. Mr. Garretin laid out.
• to another facility currently, yeah, just to transfer it in a finished form.
• How do you define this facility?

Transcript Highlights:

• And it'll be a little bit easier for me to set up a child care facility for you because we don't have
• I had a question about the exempted facilities and the accredited facilities.
• facilities have to apply for this license-exempt status.
• Would there be any way for these accredited and exempted facilities to have to report an employee to
• I want to echo some of the questions around ensuring that these facilities are as safe as possible.

Summary: The Human Services Subcommittee met and first took up HB 47, Child Care and Early Learning Providers, sponsored by Rep. McFarland. The bill was presented as an effort to reduce child care costs and regulatory burdens by exempting preschools from special tax assessments, moving teacher training and testing online and making it free, allowing abbreviated inspections for top providers, extending license-exempt status to employer-provided child care, and addressing an insurance issue affecting family child care homes. Members asked about DCF transparency, accreditation, background screening timelines, accountability for exempt facilities, and whether violations would still be searchable; McFarland said accreditation would still be required, DCF reporting and abuse hotlines would remain available, and the bill would not eliminate existing transparency for licensed providers. An amendment was adopted to add clarifying language and exempt certain DOD and Coast Guard child care facilities operated by DOD personnel. Several witnesses and members spoke in support, emphasizing workforce needs, affordability, and safety. HB 47 was reported favorably by a vote of 18-0. The committee then heard HB 259, which designates August 21 as Fentanyl Awareness and Education Day. Rep. Gerwig said the bill is intended to raise awareness of fentanyl’s dangers and overdose risks. Members spoke in strong support, citing fentanyl’s impact on families, youth, and first responders, and the need for education because fentanyl is often unknowingly ingested or mixed into other drugs. Gerwig also described a personal example involving a child exposed to fentanyl in a vacation rental. HB 259 was reported favorably by a vote of 17-0. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• location, and governance structure for a new regional Class A... ...facility location, and governance
• structure for a new regional Class A biosolids facility.
• They also have informed me that they have concerns about that facility.
• Senate Bill 320 removes unnecessary district requirements across assessments, personnel, facilities,
• It updates school facility requirements to replace rigid 5-, 10-, and 20-year facility work plans and

Summary: The Committee on Fiscal Policy heard and approved two bills. First, it took up CS for SB 290, an agriculture and consumer services bill, and adopted a strike-all amendment that covered a wide range of issues: density limits for certain small municipalities, a delay in biosolids rule changes from July 1, 2026 to July 1, 2028, higher insurance and penalty requirements for fumigation businesses, longer payment timeframes for contractors to pay subcontractors and suppliers, restrictions on county agritourism permitting ordinances, and renaming the Bonifay Forestry Station. Senators raised concerns about the contractor penalty increase, local government preemption, and the biosolids provisions. Audubon Florida testified in opposition to the state lands and biosolids sections, while several industry and agriculture groups waved in support. The committee then voted the bill favorably, with Senator Bracey Davis voting no. The committee next heard SB 320 on administrative efficiency in public schools. The bill would reduce district-level requirements in areas such as assessments, personnel, facilities, and budgeting; expand teacher apprenticeship and multi-year contracts; streamline salary supplements and testing calendars; give districts more flexibility with Title I and capital funds; update facility planning rules; and shift oversight of district-run VPK programs. Supporters from several school districts and education groups waved in favor. Senators generally supported the goal of reducing administrative burdens, though one question was raised about remedies if charter schools fail to respond directly to Department of Education inquiries. The sponsor said the bill is intended to create a more direct reporting path and reduce unnecessary layers of regulation. SB 320 was reported favorably, and the committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• One is to take some tours today, or tour today and tour tomorrow of some of the facilities that are kind
• I represent the Far Northeast Heights in District 31, and this is such a beautiful facility.
• The Youth Services Center is a 78-bed facility. We have six living units: five male and one female.
• We booked 401 youth into our facility.
• It is imperative that we increase our staffing levels to operate the facility at maximum capacity and

Transcript Highlights:

• or determining whether a facility is economically needed.
• energy production facilities.
• energy production facilities.
• Our ask would be, before a facility is established...
• They're actively licensing their facility there.

Summary: The Advanced Nuclear Energy Committee met to review prior minutes and hear a series of presentations on advanced nuclear technology and state readiness. The committee approved the April 21, 2022 minutes. Nucleon’s William Bridge outlined the advanced nuclear landscape, distinguishing near-term light-water SMRs from more advanced Gen 4 reactors and microreactors, and emphasized that fuel supply, especially HALEU, remains a developing supply chain. He said light-water designs are the most deployable in the near term, while advanced reactors may be better suited for industrial heat applications and could face a 2- to 3-year delay from fuel availability. Representatives from NASEO described how other states are supporting advanced nuclear through task forces, roadmaps, pilot programs, financing tools, workforce and supply-chain efforts, and regional coordination. They highlighted the Advanced Nuclear First Mover Initiative and stressed that states are focusing early on emergency preparedness, community engagement, waste management, affordability, and consumer protections. They also noted that some states are creating nuclear-ready community programs and cost-recovery guardrails, while public utility commissions are examining long-term lifecycle costs and rate impacts. North Dakota agencies then outlined their potential roles. The Public Service Commission said it would likely be involved in public-interest review, siting, and rate regulation, but noted current statutes may not fully address long-term nuclear projects, co-location, or decommissioning. The Department of Environmental Quality said it would continue to regulate radioactive materials and likely support emergency planning, while fission reactor oversight remains federal. The Department of Emergency Services said it would serve as the lead off-site preparedness agency, needing a radiological emergency program, training, exercises, equipment, and possibly industry funding. The Department of Water Resources said North Dakota has sufficient surface water, especially from the Missouri River, but that water planning would be important; it did not recommend statutory or budget changes at this time. The committee recessed for lunch after these presentations, with no additional votes or actions taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Facility Planning doesn't administer all of the projects.
• Again, this bar chart represents the annual... ...years in Facility Planning.
• Facility Planning’s role is to get those... ...accomplishing projects in the capital outlay bill, Facility
• Well, what that is: Facility Planning was created in the 1970s when all— Well, what that is: Facility
• This is facility planning.

Summary: The committee met for an informational hearing focused largely on the state capital outlay process and House Bill 2. Roger Husser and Matt Baker of the Division of Administration/Facility Planning and Control described how the office prepares and administers the capital outlay bill, said the bill has grown substantially over five years, and argued that recent changes in culture, staffing, project management, cash-flow analysis, and use of third-party support have more than doubled project expenditures and improved delivery. Members asked about the use and cost of third-party project managers, delegation of smaller projects to agencies, hiring difficulties, and whether the changes represented better interpretation of existing law versus statutory changes. Husser said some statutes were amended, some internal customs were removed, and the office would provide a list of those changes. He also explained that the office is trying to move away from overly rigid practices and toward faster project completion while still following public-bid and oversight rules. A major portion of the discussion centered on the size and structure of the capital outlay bill, especially the gap between Priority 1 cash capacity and the much larger Priority 5 backlog. Husser said the current annual Priority 1 limit is tied to construction inflation and is about $574 million, with additional surplus funds also available, but that the bill contains far more Priority 5 funding than can realistically move in a five-year plan. He and members discussed dormant projects, scope creep, legacy projects that have sat in the bill for years, and the problem of false expectations for non-state entities. Proposed solutions included limiting Priority 5 to five times Priority 1, requiring annual re-endorsement by members, setting district or project caps for non-state projects, requiring time limits and reporting for grant-like non-state projects, placing matches in escrow, requiring design readiness before submission, and consolidating the many existing reporting requirements into one clearer report. Members also discussed bundling multiple projects under one agency project, which the House had begun piloting for LSU, UL Lafayette, Southern, and DOTD, and which Husser said could improve flexibility, reduce overappropriation, and better reflect actual spending. Baker then explained cash-flow management and the commitment process, saying FPC now analyzes projects annually to estimate what can actually be spent in the next fiscal year and uses commitments to allow projects to proceed when future-year funding is expected. He said overappropriations can result from poor cash-flow estimates, delays, dormant projects, or projects coming in under budget, and that the office is already reworking cash-flow assumptions and reappropriating savings where possible. Members also raised concerns about change orders and low bids; staff said project managers review change orders closely, require concurrence on non-state projects, and sometimes reduce scope to keep projects within budget. After FPC’s presentation, the committee heard the beginning of Louisiana Economic Development’s capital outlay discussion, where LED explained that its projects generally fall into three categories, including the Economic Development Awards Program and Site Readiness Program, both used to support targeted economic development and job creation.