Transcript Highlights:

• 48:53.920> for Internal appeals process and process for requesting an external, independent, third-party
• error without recoupment.
• So, I hope the interested parties are listening, but I appreciate your testimony today.
• And there's mandatory third-party testing.
• And there's mandatory third-party testing.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes and then approved an agency amendment to a health and family services regulation. The amendment reversed a prior change so that neonatal ICU beds would remain subject to regular review rather than nonsubstantive review. The remaining administrative regulations were then reviewed without objection. The main presentation was from State Auditor Allison Ball on a report finding $836 million in concurrent Medicaid capitation payments from 2019 through 2022, involving individuals enrolled in Kentucky and at least one other state. Ball said Kentucky relied on the PARIS system, which has limitations because it is updated quarterly and depends on voluntary state participation, while a better federal data source, T-MSIS, was not fully available to the state. She said the audit found weak internal controls, siloed processes, outdated guidance, and a low-priority attitude toward residency checks, all of which contributed to missed alerts and improper payments. She also said the report identified additional problems, including payments made after beneficiaries died and cases involving multiple states paying for the same person. Ball recommended better access to federal data, stronger MCO contract provisions, and more active oversight by the Department for Medicaid Services and managed care organizations. She said the contracts reviewed did not provide a clear way to recoup the improper payments, though she and her counsel suggested possible equitable legal theories might be explored. Members expressed concern about the scale of the waste and the lack of contract enforcement, and asked whether any money could be recovered. Ball said the audit did not identify a clear contractual path to recoup the funds.

Transcript Highlights:

• convicted person to overcome the third convicted person to overcome the third three-year<00:57:47.520
• <01:03:36.160> The officer's party that evening. The officer's party that evening.
• This is the third regards to this bill.
• <03:54:02.399> atmosphere culturally normalized party atmosphere culturally normalized party
• longstanding and deeply entrenched party longstanding and deeply entrenched party cultures<03:54

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, if you go online to any of the third parties we typically use, um, you have to put in your billing
• <01:15:59.280> parties<01:15:59.600> we online to any of the third parties we online
• to any of the third parties we typically<01:16:00.159> use,<01:16:00.719> um<01:16:01.440
• With other third parties, they that.
• With other third parties, they don't<01:18:06.560> necessarily<01:18:07.040> capture<01

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There was an earlier version that was posted this morning that contained a formula error on line 186.
• 00:02:02.320> contained<00:02:02.680> a<00:02:02.760> formula<00:02:03.160> error
• morning that contained a formula error morning that contained a formula error um<00:02:04.320>
• I will note this is the item that there was an error with compared to the prior version.
• So all the work on the policy stuff, the third bill, the finance bill, that's all going to go to one

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, I need to increase the budget to the clerk for that third election. We'll have to wait and see.
• So, I need to increase the budget to the clerk for that third election. We'll have to wait and see.
• So, I need to increase the budget to the clerk for that third election. We'll have to wait and see.
• So, I need to increase the budget to the clerk for that third election. We'll have to wait and see.
• They come and look for you if you didn't do it right, if there was an error, if a form was missing.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Column C, the third column in, lists the degree type.
• So then there'd be like a third tier.
• So if we could even look at a one-to-two match, you know, so it's like one-third we match and two-thirds
• two-thirds you match.
• Well, you can sit out here; we'll have a party for you, so.

Summary: The Higher Ed Funding Committee met to review how North Dakota might identify and address low-producing academic programs and to discuss draft funding formulas for the university system. Lisa Johnson of the NDUS explained that the State Board of Higher Education is already developing a system-wide policy, using models from other states such as Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Colorado, Kentucky, Ohio, and Connecticut. She described how low-producing programs are typically flagged by multi-year enrollment or completion thresholds, then reviewed for workforce demand, mission fit, cost, accreditation, and regional need before any action is taken. Committee members asked about what counts as a program, how costs are analyzed, whether certificates are included, how exemptions work for mission-critical or high-demand fields, and whether the board or legislature should set the rules. Johnson said the board is the appropriate body to lead the process, but legislators could use funding leverage if they wanted to encourage action; the chair asked the board to bring a detailed proposal to the June meeting. The committee then heard a Legislative Council presentation on a draft formula for UND and NDSU. The proposal uses fall census FTE enrollment, with a placeholder undergraduate rate of $7,000 per FTE and a graduate/professional rate of $10,500, plus incentives for completions in in-demand fields and research productivity. Alex from Legislative Council walked through the projected funding effects, noting that the model would increase funding for NDSU and reduce it for UND in the current biennium, with different results in the next biennium as enrollment changes are recognized. Members questioned the use of the placeholder rates, the definition of in-demand programs, the treatment of research funding, and the exclusion of state-appropriated dollars from the external grants calculation. The chair emphasized that the numbers were illustrative and that appropriators would set the actual dollar amounts later. A second draft formula for the other nine institutions was also reviewed. That model uses fall census FTE without a weighted economic factor, applies a higher undergraduate rate, and adds completion incentives for in-demand credentials and all other completions. Members noted that the formula would benefit some institutions, such as Bismarck State College, while reducing funding for others, such as Mayville State, and discussed whether the nine institutions should be treated more uniformly or split into smaller groups because of their different missions and sizes. Committee members and staff repeatedly stressed that the formulas are still being refined and that some institutions would likely need hold-harmless adjustments or other transition measures. The meeting ended with the chair directing the committee to continue the discussion later and to expect further work on both the low-producing program policy and the funding formulas.

Transcript Highlights:

• to order the following resolutions to the first-day consent calendar to correct a committee report error
• request unanimous consent to rescind the action whereby, on June 15, 2026, SB 1189, Viadaris, was read a third
• Please order the bill back to the third reading file. Without objection, such shall be the order.
• We run a legislator program, a young assembly member program, and this is my third year doing the Young
• He's a third-year student, and we were very excited to have him for the last several weeks, helping us

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• to order the following resolutions to the first-day consent calendar to correct a committee report error
• request unanimous consent to rescind the action whereby, on June 15, 2026, SB 1189, Viadaris, was read a third
• Please order the bill back to the third reading file. Without objection, such shall be the order.
• We run a legislator program, a young assembly member program, and this is my third year doing the Young
• He's a third-year student, and we were very excited to have him for the last several weeks, helping us

Summary: The Assembly met with an initial quorum call, then proceeded through routine floor business, guest introductions, and several procedural motions. Members approved requests to suspend rules for adjournment-in-memory remarks and guest seating, removed some bills from the consent calendar, and re-referred or withdrew several measures. The chamber also took up a number of second-reading and concurrence items later in the day. Two major bills drew floor debate. SB 762, a tax measure allowing eligible local governments to seek voter approval for transactions and use tax rates above the statutory cap, was presented as a response to local fiscal pressures and was described by supporters as giving voters local choice rather than imposing a tax increase. It passed with an urgency vote of 54-13 and was sent immediately to the Senate. AB 126, the education budget trailer bill, was presented as a major investment in TK-12 education, special education, community schools, and educator leave; one member supported many provisions but objected to policy changes affecting charter schools being included in a budget bill. The Assembly concurred in the Senate amendments on AB 126 by a vote of 56-1. The Assembly also concurred in AB 35, an urgency environmental protection bill intended to speed implementation of Proposition 4-funded projects by narrowing administrative delay; supporters said it would accelerate wildfire prevention, water, and other environmental projects. The measure passed unanimously, 66-0. The consent calendar was then adopted, including AB 2796 on criminal history information, which passed 67-0. The session concluded with multiple adjournment-in-memory tributes, including remarks honoring victims of a B-52 test flight crash at Edwards Air Force Base, former West Covina Mayor Lloyd Johnson, civil rights leader Harold Brown, educator and activist Kiyoko Nancy Oda, and Auburn Mayor John Mike Holmes, followed by announcements of summer recess and adjournment until August 3.

Transcript Highlights:

• crisis standards of care, and the relegation of people with disabilities to sort of second-class or third-class
• crisis standards of care, and the relegation of people with disabilities to sort of second-class or third-class
• And ultimately, I and other people with disabilities were appointed to the committee that wrote the third
• Ultimately, the third standards that came out, we weren't able to get them to not consider long-term
• Was that an error? No, I'm sorry.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Permanent Commission on the Status of Persons with Disabilities’ Long-Term Services and Supports and Health Equity Subcommittee met to hear a presentation from Colin Killick of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network on disability discrimination in crisis standards of care during COVID-19. He described how Massachusetts and other states initially used standards that prioritized longer life expectancy and, in some cases, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which he argued devalued the lives of disabled people and older adults. He also discussed related issues such as denial of transplants, pressure on disabled patients to sign do-not-resuscitate orders, and inequities affecting communities of color. He said disability advocates, legal groups, and public officials pushed back through litigation, media, and organizing, leading to revisions of Massachusetts’ standards and the eventual inclusion of disability advocates in the drafting process. Killick also discussed vaccine rollout, saying disabled people were initially under-prioritized but later gained broader access and more accessible vaccination options such as ASL interpretation and in-home vaccination. He closed by urging support for S. 869, an act relative to preventing discrimination against persons with disabilities in the provision of health care, which he said would ban disability-based discrimination in crisis standards, prohibit QALYs in health care decision-making, and add protections against coerced DNRs. He noted the bill had been favorably reported out of the Health Care Financing Committee but still needed support. In questions, members asked why the bill had not advanced further; Killick said earlier opposition from QALY supporters had been resolved, and the main barrier now was lack of legislative prioritization. Members thanked him for the presentation and for the work on revising crisis standards. The subcommittee then completed roll call, approved the prior minutes, and adjourned, noting the next meeting would be August 31.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think it was a copy error uh when we were uh creating the different bills here.
• I think it was a a a copy error<00:09:09.440> uh<00:09:09.519> when<00:09:09.760> we
• :09:10.000> were<00:09:10.480> uh<00:09:10.880> adding<00:09:11.720> u error
• uh when we were uh adding u error uh when we were uh adding u creating<00:09:13.120> the<00:09
• So she started digging and realized that about a third of her online class turned out to not be real.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up a series of “same and similar” provisions between the House and Senate higher education bills and adopted them one by one, with brief explanations from members and staff. The items included a cybersecurity addition for a doctoral degree program, Northstar Promise definitions and eligibility limits, self-loan provisions on institution eligibility and data disclosure, and dual training language requiring certificates, diplomas, or degrees to come from accredited postsecondary institutions. The committee also adopted an amendment to the private career school provisions that clarified exempt institutions remain within the act, and removed certain limited-license and renewal fees for institutions participating in dual training grants or the eligible training provider list. Each of these motions prevailed by voice vote. The committee then moved into policy differences between the House and Senate bills, beginning with emergency grants and hunger-free campus grants. Members discussed shifting funding from OHE-administered competitive grants to direct appropriations for the University of Minnesota and Minnesota State, while the Senate retained competitive grant access for private and tribal colleges and added reporting requirements. OHE Commissioner Dennis Olson said the added reporting would be an extra administrative task but raised no significant concerns. Testifiers from the University of Minnesota, Minnesota State, and the private college sector supported faster, more direct funding and described the grants as important for emergency housing, transportation, food insecurity, and other student basic needs. A LeadMN representative also supported the changes, saying campus staff and students wanted funds delivered more quickly. The committee also discussed direct admissions on R31. The Senate proposal would require public and charter high schools to participate in the direct admissions program by the 2029-2030 school year. Assistant Commissioner Wendy Robinson said OHE supports statewide expansion and that the program has improved FAFSA completion, college enrollment, and student retention in Minnesota. Members noted the bill had bipartisan support and heard from advocates such as Ed Allies and Students United. No votes were taken on the policy-difference items during this portion of the meeting, and the chair said further discussion of state grant and sexual misconduct policy differences would be held at a later hearing with additional OHE staff present.

Transcript Highlights:

• Law finds that the agency's rule impact statement is incomplete and contains substantive errors.
• The conclusion in this report is that the errors within these documents, A million point four.
• The conclusion in this report is that the errors within these documents and the subsequent revisions
• The conclusion in this report is that the errors within these documents and the subsequent revisions

Bills: HJR1090, HJR1091, HJR1092, HJR1093, HJR1094, HJR1095, SJR49

Keywords: administrative rules, rule approval, joint resolution, Oklahoma Register, Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry, Corporation Commission, Department of Environmental Quality, Liquified Petroleum Gas Board, water resources, wildlife conservation, tourism, zoning commission, energy regulation, agricultural regulation, agency rules, permanent rules, state agencies, Oklahoma Legislature, business and commerce, professional licensing

Summary: The committee took up several joint resolutions dealing with agency rules. H.J.R. 1090, approving energy- and agriculture-related agency rules, was adopted and passed 10-0. H.J.R. 1091, covering business and commerce rules, was also adopted and passed 10-0. H.J.R. 1092, which had been split out from the business and commerce packet because of a reported $10 million cost impact on one business, was adopted after discussions with regulators about delaying remodeling requirements and addressing safety concerns; it passed unanimously. H.J.R. 1093, approving health-related agency rules, passed 11-0, with some Oklahoma Health Care Authority major rules noted as being handled separately in the Senate. The committee then discussed H.C.R. 1094, a major rule from the Long-Range Capital Planning Commission. Members raised concerns that the agency’s rule impact statement contained errors, incorrect notice and hearing information, and an incomplete economic analysis. After debate over whether the resolution could be amended or had to be accepted or rejected as a whole, the committee voted 11-0 that it did not pass. The committee then considered H.J.R. 1095 with an amendment to specifically disapprove a proposed permanent rule change by the Long-Range Capital Planning Commission that would have allowed the commission to ignore its own rules in the “best interest of the state.” The amendment was adopted 11-1, and the resolution as amended passed. At the end of the meeting, the chair thanked members and staff for their work and said the committee would try to move the resolutions to the floor on Thursday, with another meeting likely needed to address additional major rules coming from the Senate. A committee member also suggested a brief educational review of a prior procedural issue at a future meeting, and the chair agreed to discuss broader concerns about the administrative rules process in a later wrap-up.

Transcript Highlights:

• At the same time, about one-third of the Army deployed last year.
• Advertising after that, high school recruiters, those all come second, third, and fourth.
• , that, um, you know, it was 250,000 and we actually lowered it on your advice, which again was in error
• which<01:16:45.120> again<01:16:45.520> was<01:16:46.480> in<01:16:46.800> error
• /c><01:16:47.199> the<01:16:47.360> time<01:16:47.520> and which again was in error

Bills: HB0032

Keywords: English proficiency, commercial drivers, vehicle operation, traffic safety, penalties, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• SERVICES MODULE, THIS ONE CONSOLIDATES PROVIDER ENROLLMENT SERVICES INTO A SINGLE PROCESS TO MINIMIZE ERRORS
• IT WILL ALSO HELP US RESOLVE OUR CURRENT PAYMENT ERROR RATE FINDINGS THE AGENCY HAS HAD AROUND RISK BASED
• ALL THE DECISIONS AROUND WHICH MODULES WENT FIRST, SECOND, THIRD, ETC. WERE DONE BASED ON FEEDBACK.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, third item: conversion of planning information into appealable agency decisions.
• Uh, third item: conversion of planning information into appealable agency decisions.
• Uh, third item: conversion of planning information into appealable agency decisions.
• Uh, third item: conversion of planning information into appealable agency decisions.
• testimony had a lot of errors in it. testimony had a lot of errors in it.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committees heard testimony on five housing-related measures. SB 2232 would create a three-year tiny home grant pilot program within HHFDC, with annual reporting to HHFDC and the Legislature; testimony was mixed, and the bill was later recommended for passage with amendments, including a full-time housing development specialist, a residential-use-only restriction for the tiny homes, and a blanked appropriation. SB 2192 would bar county down-zoning that reduces housing capacity unless equivalent capacity is added elsewhere in the county; it drew support from housing advocates and comments from planning officials, and was also recommended for passage with amendments. SB 2378 would clarify insurance requirements for single- and multifamily projects seeking expedited county permitting; engineers and housing groups supported it, while one testifier opposed it, and it was recommended for passage with a technical amendment. SB 2524 would appropriate funds to the City and County of Honolulu for housing-related departments to comply with prior acts; the Honolulu department supported it, and members asked about prior spending and funding sources. SB 2398 would require residential housing utility availability maps; the Honolulu Board of Water Supply opposed the bill as written, citing infrastructure security, accuracy, liability, and administrative burden concerns, while supporters said it would improve transparency for developers. The chair proposed amendments to make the maps broad and geographic rather than parcel-specific, remove contested-case and reliance provisions, allow disclaimer language, and change the date; the bill was then recommended for passage with amendments, with one member noting reservations. All five measures were ultimately passed out of committee with amendments, with votes recorded and some members excused.

Transcript Highlights:

• 00:13:19.760> the The library moved from the sixth floor of the State Office Building to the third
• We also have a small reading room on the third floor of the Minnesota Senate building.
• <00:20:28.039> text<00:20:28.400> fix<00:20:28.799> ing<00:20:28.919> errors
• removing obsolete text fix ing errors removing obsolete text fix ing errors from<00:20:29.559>
• representative kwam it's the third representative kwam it's the third bullet<00:48:54.839> on

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee met briefly to approve the January 16 minutes, then heard a series of informational presentations from legislative joint offices and commissions that fall under its jurisdiction. Michelle Urick of the Legislative Coordinating Commission explained the LCC’s governance structure, including its leadership-based membership and role overseeing joint offices such as the Legislative Auditor, Legislative Budget Office, Legislative Reference Library, Revisor of Statutes, and the LCC staff office itself. Christian Larson of the Legislative Budget Office described the office’s nonpartisan fiscal note work, local impact notes, and support for the Tax Expenditure Review Commission, noting the volume of requests it handles and that the office currently has 18 budgeted FTE. He also explained the LBO Oversight Commission’s role in setting standards and appointing the director. Elizabeth Lincoln of the Legislative Reference Library outlined the library’s services, including answering thousands of reference questions, maintaining state policy and legislative collections, archiving state documents, supporting the legislative website and search tools, and preserving House and Senate audio, video, and committee minutes. She also noted the library’s staffing levels and its move to the Capitol. In response to a question, she said copies of the book Minnesota Standoff were in constant circulation, that the title is out of print, and that the library had digitized it for use by legislators and staff. Ryan Inman, the Revisor of Statutes, described the office’s drafting, legal review, publication, IT, and other services. He said every bill introduced is reviewed by a Revisor attorney, the office publishes Laws of Minnesota, Minnesota Statutes, and Minnesota Rules, and it maintains the legislative drafting system now being replaced. He also discussed rule drafting for agencies, legal counsel, the claims subcommittee, court opinions reports, and the annual technical Revisor bill. Members asked about bill volume, amendment drafting, and the history of administrative rules review; Inman said the office is handling over 2,500 active bill requests and that a prior commission on administrative rules existed in the past. No votes were taken beyond approving the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• somebody that owns a commercial elevator, which is the only type that gets inspected, is a rounding error
• the reimbursement applications to assure that the mathematical calculations are correct and without error
• 27:25.399> without calculations are correct and without calculations are correct and without error
• 27.399> total<00:27:28.360> staff<00:27:28.799> persons<00:27:29.440> who error
• um so in total staff persons who error um so in total staff persons who work<00:27:30.399> on

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard from the Department of Labor on several House Bill 2 sections. Members discussed raising the annual elevator certificate fee, which had been $50 since at least fiscal year 2014; the commissioner said the Inspection Division generates more revenue than its costs, and members agreed to amend the fee to $75 and later voted unanimously to accept Section 137. The department also explained a proposed change to civil penalty/warning language in Section 139 to align enforcement across labor laws; that section was accepted unanimously. The commissioner then gave a detailed overview of the second injury fund, describing how it is financed by assessments on insurance carriers, how claims are reviewed for reimbursement, and how the fund is intended to reimburse certain workers’ compensation costs. Members questioned whether the program still serves its original purpose, whether it is revenue-neutral, and whether it should be sunset; the department said the fund is a mixed bag for the state and industry, but no sunset language was adopted. Sections 140 and 141 were then accepted unanimously. The committee next heard from the Judicial Council on Sections 125 through 127. The witness said the changes would streamline payment for indigent defense services other than counsel, reduce the number of bills requiring judge review, and expand the council’s ability to contract with providers for services such as translation and evaluations. He also explained a proposed fail-safe allowing the executive director to decline to process questionable invoices and send them to a judge instead. Members generally supported the streamlining, and Sections 125 through 127 were accepted unanimously. Toward the end of the discussion, members asked about the cost impact of changing the misdemeanor/felony threshold from $1,000 to a higher amount. The Judicial Council said felony cases are significantly more expensive than misdemeanors because they involve more hearings, more discovery, and more attorney time, with assigned felony cases costing several times more on average. No action was taken on that question in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• party.
• party.
• Kelsey Vela: ...We have a third-party vendor, who was unable to continue to be able to deliver the actual
• We have a third-party vendor we have had along with that project, Gartner, who has helped us along the
• Kelsey Vela: ...we have a third-party vendor we have had along with that project, Gartner, who has helped

Bills: SB1

Keywords: campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards

Summary: The committee heard a Legislative Budget Board presentation and then testimony from the Department of Public Safety on the Article 5 public safety budget. LBB said DPS’s 2026-27 recommendation totals $3.7 billion, down from the prior base, while FTEs rise by 856.7. Major items included increased funding for driver license services and customer support, new trooper funding and recruit schools, crime lab operations, border security, and reductions tied to one-time facility, vehicle, and aircraft spending. The committee also discussed new riders, including one to lapse unused trooper funds and require reporting after recruit schools. Members focused heavily on driver license operations, questioning why prior staffing increases and a prior efficiency study had not solved long wait times, high call abandonment, and appointment delays. DPS and LBB said the agency receives about 22,000 calls per day, answers only about 9 percent, and is seeking more staff plus technology upgrades such as automation, kiosks, and better online processing. Senators also raised concerns about rural access, REAL ID document requirements, and whether the department should rethink its processes rather than simply add employees. DPS leadership then described needs for the Williamson County training academy, additional troopers, Capitol and Alamo security, border operations, aircraft and vehicle replacement, and regional headquarters in El Paso and San Antonio. Members asked about Operation Lone Star costs, overtime, pursuit safety, border crime, oilfield theft, and sexual assault kit and toxicology backlogs. DPS said border deployments remain focused on criminal threats, that overtime is partly driven by deployments and staffing shortages, and that the sexual assault kit backlog is down to 118 cases with a goal of zero by April. The committee later recessed and began the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission budget presentation, where LBB outlined a $115.1 million recommendation and noted ongoing costs for the AIMS technology project.

Transcript Highlights:

• The clerk will give the bill its third reading. Third reading.
• clerk will give the bill its third clerk will give the bill its third reading.<00:11:21.760>
• The clerk will give the bill its third reading. >> Third reading.
• >> Third reading. House file number 2169. >> Third reading.
• The clerk will give the bill its third reading. >> Third reading.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Third, Minnesota is home to more than 700 food brands and is an entrepreneurial food hub.
• Third, Minnesota is home to more than 700 food brands and is an entrepreneurial food hub.
• Third, Minnesota is home to more than 700 food brands and is an entrepreneurial food hub.
• Third, Minnesota is home to more than 700 food brands and is an entrepreneurial food hub.
• <01:39:45.280> on<01:39:45.480> my um there's an actually an error on my um there's

Bills: HF44, HF2102, HF2279, HF2280, HF2281

Keywords: HF44, Casey Jones State Trail, Pipestone Trailhead, Currie Loop, Minnesota bonding bill, capital investment, state bonds, bond proceeds fund, Department of Natural Resources, DNR, trail rehabilitation, trail reconstruction, recreational trail, bike trail, hiking trail, infrastructure, state trail, Pipestone, Currie, bonding authorization

Transcript Highlights:

• It corrects grammatical errors and miscellaneous drafting and engrossing or other errors.
• It corrects grammatical errors and miscellaneous drafting and engrossing or other errors.
• It corrects grammatical errors and miscellaneous drafting and engrossing or other errors.
• It corrects grammatical errors and miscellaneous drafting and engrossing or other errors.
• other errors.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all