Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial transparency'
Page 143 of 467
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 1/23/25
Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:03:49.680>
districts three members from judicial districts three members from judicial - We have 243 employees and currently 15 volunteers in the Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County.
- District um henan County um in Judicial District um henan County um in 2024<00:05:12.919>
we < - In the last few years, we successfully combined management of six of our 10 judicial districts.
- There were only large concentrations of volunteers in the Fourth Judicial District and the Second.
Summary:
The House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee approved the January 21 minutes and then reviewed committee rules, emphasizing deadlines for handouts, testimony notices, and substantive amendments, along with a warning that disruptive signs, noise, or demonstrations could lead to removal from the hearing room. The chair said the rules would be shared with the full House and noted the committee would operate with quorum and not tolerate chaos.
The committee then heard a presentation from Tammy Baker Olson, the state program administrator for the Guardian ad Litem Board, on the program’s structure and budget request. She explained that guardians ad litem are independent voices for children’s best interests in child protection and family court cases, not attorneys or direct service providers. She said the program operates statewide, with 243 employees, and in 2024 advocated for more than 12,000 children, attended over 30,000 court proceedings, and filed reports in over 16,000 hearings. She also described specialized Family Court and Indian Child Welfare divisions, efforts to address racial disparities, and training requirements for guardians.
Members asked about mileage and travel demands, the distinction between a child’s attorney and a guardian ad litem, caseloads, re-entry outcomes, the move from contractor/volunteer models to employee-based staffing, and the role of volunteers. Olson said most guardians use personal vehicles and mileage reimbursement, average caseloads are about 24, and the program has not seen a statewide increase in cases but does face staffing vacancies and turnover in some areas. She said the board believes the employee model improved advocacy and supervision, while the program is rebuilding a modest volunteer pool. She also said the program supports Indian Family Preservation Act-related work and has a formal process for handling conflicts of interest, which should be raised immediately to a supervisor rather than waiting for a complaint process.
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 029 Feb 11th, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- That's not taking transparency seriously.
- I move House Bill 1158 to the bill. >> Uh, the bill is the supplemental for the Judicial Department.
- Um, there are a number of independent agencies contained within the Judicial Department.
- Um there are a the judicial department.
- contained within the judicial contained within the judicial department.<04:11:54.640>
And
Summary:
The House convened, led the pledge of allegiance, and established a quorum before approving the corrected journal. The Majority Leader then moved a long list of bills—House Bills 1150 through 1179—to be made special orders for February 11, 2026 at 9:15 a.m., and the chamber agreed without objection.
The committee then took up House Bill 1150, a supplemental appropriation for the Department of Agriculture. Representative Serna explained it included technical adjustments tied to other agencies, plus a pilot program to test a biocontrol strategy for the mountain pine beetle infestation in Colorado’s ponderosa pine forests. After brief opposition from a member who said he would vote no on spending measures generally, the bill passed.
House Bill 1151, the supplemental appropriation for the Department of Corrections, generated extensive debate. Supporters said the bill was necessary to cover major costs such as medical case loads, outside medical and mental health contracts, local jail payments, prison case load, private prison utilization, and food services, while also addressing staffing and parole/community corrections coordination. Opponents argued the state keeps funding more beds instead of investing in services that reduce incarceration, criticized DOC management and delays, and said the legislature should demand better accountability and efficiency. Supporters countered that DOC does not control the parole board or community corrections, that the prison population is aging, and that the state must pay for required custody and care. The transcript ends amid continued debate over the corrections supplemental, with no final vote on House Bill 1151 shown in the excerpt.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Health and Human Services - 03/18/26
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- So, this limits the payment withholds to 60 days and then that allows for some judicial oversight so
- This is transparency and I think that um they deserve it and I think that would help Would help start
- <01:08:12.840>
as do, but I think being as transparent as do, but I think being as transparent - one friend in this case and we need to be as transparent as possible.
- one friend in this case and we need to be as transparent as possible.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
Senate Executive Departments and Administration (04/01/2026)
Executive Departments and Administration
Transcript Highlights:
- Put simply, judicial deference is a judicial doctrine which ties the hands of judges and forces them
- Judicial deference fits framework.
- >
is <00:16:46.120>a Put simply, judicial deference is a Put simply, judicial deference - /c><00:25:39.480>
system judicial deference creates a system judicial deference creates a system - Thank you. judicial branch's role judicial branch's role um<00:29:53.640>
and <00:29:54.160>
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm the executive director of the Judicial Council.
- I'm the executive director of the Judicial Council.
- So judicial council has to interest.
- judicial council. judicial council.
- judicial Um, does the judicial council<00:21:49.039>
have <00:21:49.280>the <00:21:49.520
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you for that explanation and transparency, Senator Driscoll. Okay.
- It is to serve Wyoming taxpayers efficiently, transparently, and sustainably. Mr.
- efficiently, transparently, and efficiently, transparently, and sustainably.<02:32:41.280>
Cities - Of course, lawyers want the judicial branch to solve things, right?
- Of course, lawyers want the judicial branch to solve things, right?
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Health and Human Services - 03/12/26
Health and Human Services
Transcript Highlights:
- and a judicial warrant. and a judicial warrant.
- c><00:53:59.520>
would <00:53:59.600>be judicial warrant or that would be judicial warrant - daycare employees to request a judicial daycare employees to request a judicial warrant.<00:54:12.200
- If there is a signed judicial warrant If there is a signed judicial warrant and<00:55:31.800>
somebody - I'm a big fan of judicial warrants.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary (3-11-25) - Upon Adjournment
Transcript Highlights:
- Our judicial branch judges have the power to deal with interruptions in the courtroom by use of criminal
- I'm trying to do: put in the statute something that is already protecting the executive branch, judicial
- who later became the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for many years, was concerned about the judicial
- I'm trying to do: put in the statute something that is already protecting the executive branch, judicial
- Put in the statute something that is already protecting the executive branch, judicial branch.
Keywords:
This meeting will take place upon adjournment of the Senate Chambers. There is not an exact time for this meeting therefore a placeholder time for the live stream has been set for 4:00PM est.
Meeting Start: 00:00:00
Roll Call: 00:00:20
HB 10: 00:00:47
HB 399: 00:03:40, 958, all
Summary:
The committee met with a quorum and took up two House bills. House Bill 10, relating to the rights of real property owners, was presented as a response to squatting. The sponsors said it would create a streamlined process to remove unauthorized occupants from real property, define “squatter” in statute, and keep existing criminal mischief penalties aligned for damage to property. After a motion and second, the bill was approved and reported favorably with the expression that it should pass.
The committee then heard House Bill 399, relating to interference with legislative proceedings. The sponsor and the Senate Sergeant at Arms said the bill is intended to protect the General Assembly’s ability to conduct business by penalizing obstructing or impeding legislators or legislative employees and disruptive conduct in legislative spaces, while still allowing protest. They emphasized that the measure would give the legislative branch protections similar to those already available to the executive and judicial branches, and that arrests would be made only at the call of leadership or a committee chair.
Members voted to advance House Bill 399 after discussion. One senator explained that while he supported moving the bill forward, he was concerned the language could be broad enough to cover peaceful demonstrations, such as teachers rallying at the Capitol, and said he would need more time before deciding how to vote on the floor. The committee ultimately reported the bill favorably with the expression that it should pass, and then adjourned.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
Finance Budget Briefing (06/10/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, row 41 judicial branch budget reduction removed by the Senate.
- Um, row 41 judicial branch budget reduction removed by the Senate.
- Um, row 41 judicial branch budget reduction removed by the Senate.
- of about 7.8 million on the judicial of about 7.8 million on the judicial branch.<01:11:06.480><
- There was a reduction judicial branch.
Summary:
The presentation was an LBA overview of Senate changes to the House-passed state budget, with Michael Kane explaining how Senate Finance updated revenue and spending estimates after April revenue figures and agency discussions. He said the Senate’s revenue outlook was higher than the House’s in some areas, but lower in others, especially video lottery terminal revenue, and that the biggest differences also came from changes to revenue splits between the general fund and education trust fund, lapse estimates, and several policy changes in House Bill 1 and House Bill 2.
Kane highlighted several major revenue and policy differences: the Senate changed the business tax, tobacco tax, and real estate transfer tax splits; adjusted liquor revenue dedication; removed the House’s meals-and-rooms distribution cap; delayed the Lakes Region facility proceeds plan; altered the PECARD fund treatment; added a granite patron of the arts tax credit; and changed the treatment of unique funds and video lottery terminal revenue. On spending, he noted Senate changes to judicial, corrections, HHS, human rights commission, and other budgets, including additional settlement costs, higher lapse assumptions, and a different approach to Medicaid premium revenue and retirement savings. He also described Senate additions such as a nursing home bed fee, Hampstead Hospital transition funding, and changes to the YDC claims settlement fund.
The presentation focused on comparing House and Senate surplus statements across fiscal years 2025 through 2027, including projected ending balances and rainy day fund transfers. Kane repeatedly emphasized that the numbers were still dependent on final revenues and lapse amounts, and that some balances would be carried forward and trued up later in the biennium. No committee vote or final action was described in the excerpt; it was an informational budget briefing and comparison of the two chambers’ proposals.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - Part 2 - 04/17/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, I share Senator Kunes' concerns and uh as government uh sometimes they aren't always most transparent
- either and so uh most transparent either and so uh I<00:23:05.760>
just <00:23:06.000>wonder - note, when you look at it, and I hadn't had the information about Hennepin County alone at 1,034 judicial
- ><01:30:27.440>
1,034 Hennepin County alone at at 1,034 Hennepin County alone at at 1,034 judicial - actions, and I think the fiscal judicial actions, and I think the fiscal note<01:30:31.960>
was
NV
Transcript Highlights:
- My name is Andres M-D-R-E-S, last name Moses, M-O-S-E, on behalf of the 8th Judicial District Court in
- Therefore, AB 344, in its first reprint, replaces the term “master” with “judicial officer” throughout
- And that was brought forward by two of our judicial officers from the state who had children in their
- The term “master” with “judicial officer” throughout the relevant statutes, providing a more accurate
- And that was brought forward by two of our judicial officers from the state who had children in their
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - Part 2 - 03/25/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- you know, we are limited in terms of our ability to force treatment with the exception of through judicial
- treatment with the exception<00:04:16.680>
of <00:04:17.000>through <00:04:17.680>judicial - Protects sensitive proprietary data and it seeks to improve transparency where that is appropriate and
- Protects sensitive proprietary data and it seeks to improve transparency where that is appropriate and
- <00:31:27.760>
where and enhance public transparency where and enhance public transparency
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (02/26/2025)
Health, Human Services & Elderly Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- House Bill 732 is really about parents' rights and transparency.
- aware of the risks possibly associated with the medication that is being prescribed, and about transparency
- to take a look at the transparency to take a look at the website<02:15:58.440>
for <02:15:58.559 - To the contrary, that's the point of our judicial system, is to determine whether there's a crime that's
- To the contrary, that's the point of our judicial system, is to determine whether there's a crime that's
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 4/15/26
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- , titled uh 2026 legislative, judicial, titled uh 2026 legislative, judicial, and<00:38:21.600>
- <00:43:55.960>
I judicial security in here as well. I judicial security in here as well.- Administrator for the Minnesota Judicial Administrator for the Minnesota Judicial Branch<00:54:26.040
- Total incidents, security incidents reported across the state and judicial branch in the judicial branch
- ,<01:02:45.600>
and additional executive, judicial, and additional executive, judicial, and - <00:43:55.960>
Keywords:
public safety, radio communications, infrastructure funding, county funding, interoperability, ARMER network, local jurisdictions, HF4597, Minnesota public safety, 911, emergency dispatch, emergency communications, public safety appropriation, Metropolitan Emergency Services Board, PSAP, dispatch interoperability, real-time coordination, emergency response coordination, cross-jurisdictional response, 911 center awareness platform
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, would like to recognize the chair of Judicial Proceedings Committee.
- <00:03:35.840>
Uh Judicial Proceedings Committee. Uh Judicial Proceedings Committee. - Judicial proceedings. >> Thank you very much, Mr. President.
- Judicial proceedings. >> 1:45. All right. Judicial proceedings.
- > judicial proceedings committee will judicial proceedings committee will start<01:31:22.639>
at
Summary:
The Senate convened, confirmed a quorum, and heard several ceremonial recognitions, including an invocation by seminarian Benjamin Oler and a resolution honoring Taiwan’s ambassador, Alexander Ui Tore, for strengthening Maryland’s partnership with Taiwan. Senators also welcomed the day’s doctor, Dr. Larry Green, AFCEA Central Maryland chapter members, Chesapeake Bay Foundation student leaders, and Salisbury University students visiting for committee work.
On legislation, the chamber referred Senate Bill 995 on cannabis licensing, labor peace agreements, and collective bargaining rules to the Rules Committee, and a bond initiative for New Market Town Hall to the Capital Budget Subcommittee. The Senate then took up Senate Bill 241, which would automatically restore voter registration for individuals released from state correctional facilities; the committee amendments were adopted without objection, and the bill was ordered printed for third reading.
The main floor debate centered on Senate Bill 323, the Juvenile Court Jurisdiction Youth Charging Reform Act. One amendment to keep first-degree assault in automatic adult charging was offered and debated at length, with supporters arguing the offense is extremely serious and should begin in adult court, and opponents saying the bill allows judges to make individualized decisions and aligns Maryland with other states and federal juvenile practice. The amendment failed by a 27-vote negative roll call. A second amendment from the minority whip sought to exclude firearm-in-drug-crime offenses and firearm use with felony drug convictions from automatic juvenile court treatment; the sponsor argued these offenses involve serious armed drug activity and should remain in adult court, while the bill’s supporters emphasized juvenile services and judicial discretion. The transcript cuts off before the vote on that second amendment.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
2026 RS Senate Impeachment Committee (4-15-26)
Transcript Highlights:
- Court did reveal for the first time that Judge Goodman is undergoing a parallel proceeding in the Judicial
- of Judge Julie Muth Goodman be stayed indefinitely pending conclusion of an investigation by the Judicial
- of Judge Julie Muth Goodman be stayed indefinitely pending conclusion of an investigation by the Judicial
- of Judge Julie Muth Goodman be stayed indefinitely pending conclusion of an investigation by the Judicial
- of Judge Julie Muth Goodman be stayed indefinitely pending conclusion of an investigation by the Judicial
Summary:
The Senate committee met under Rule 39 to consider proceedings related to the impeachment of Judge Julie Muth Goodman of the Fayette Circuit Court. Chair Storm explained that the House had transmitted impeachment articles on March 24, 2026, and that the Kentucky Constitution requires the Senate to address them. He also noted a preliminary Kentucky Supreme Court order issued April 6, 2026, in Judge Goodman’s separate lawsuit against the House, and said the Court revealed she is also facing a parallel Judicial Conduct Commission proceeding on the same issues. The chair emphasized that the committee’s actions were guided by constitutional duties and fairness to the defendant.
Senator Howell moved that the committee recommend to the full Senate that impeachment proceedings be stayed indefinitely pending completion of the Judicial Conduct Commission investigation, with the understanding that the stay would not waive the Senate’s constitutional authority. Senator Carroll seconded the motion. Senator Chambers-Armstrong said she would vote yes on the stay but preferred the body explicitly dismiss the complaint or otherwise state it would take no further action, citing the Supreme Court’s ruling as unconstitutional for further action.
The committee voted 7-0 in favor of the motion, with all members present voting aye. Chair Storm then directed staff to prepare the motion as a committee report to the full Senate and stressed that the action should not be construed as an acquittal or as the Senate relinquishing any constitutional rights or duties.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session 5/12/26 - Part 3
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- for disabled people and in other areas is just abdicating our legislative responsibility to the judicial
- responsibility to to the judicial responsibility to to the judicial branch.<01:17:17.199>
So< - I worry that what we are doing instead is opening up the door for the judicial branch to step into what
- branch to step into what should judicial branch to step into what should be<01:33:21.840>
our - limited transparency. limited transparency.
Summary:
The House took up House File 4138, a bill aimed at limiting harmful social media features for children and requiring parental involvement for minors using platforms in Minnesota. Early on, members reconsidered and then adopted the Smith amendment (A13) after first rejecting a narrower amendment to the amendment (A18) on a 67-67 tie. Representative Bonner then offered a technical amendment (A14) to address liability and drafting concerns, but withdrew it after saying it contained an unintended drafting error and could create legal problems, including issues around data collection and rulemaking.
During third reading debate, supporters described the bill as a first step to protect children from addictive social media design, online exploitation, and harmful data practices. Representative Scott said the bill would require parental consent and limit addictive features for child accounts, while emphasizing that the consent language must be prominent and that the bill’s effective date would not begin until next July. Representative Enen, Representative Feist, Representative Greenman, and others backed the measure as a bipartisan effort to hold big tech accountable and protect kids, though Greenman also noted that the legislature had not shown the same willingness to confront gun violence.
Opponents and skeptics raised concerns that the bill relies on parents understanding complex legal and technical terms, that it may not fully protect children, and that it could still leave gaps around liability and privacy. Representative Leeing questioned why the bill does not simply restrict addictive features for all children and asked about parental waivers and location tracking; Scott responded that the bill uses IP address information and does not specifically address liability waivers, but said the measure is a policy choice intended to empower parents. The debate ended with broad support from several members, and the bill was presented as likely to pass, though no final vote on the bill itself was included in the excerpt.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (03/05/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- These are legislative matters and not judicial.
- These are legislative matters and not judicial.
- “Second, so what is the duty of the judicial branch?
- He said that the rule of law was only one benefit that would flow from judicial independence.
- He said that the rule of law was only one benefit that would flow from judicial independence.
Summary:
The House Judiciary Committee met to hear House Bill 520, which would authorize the Department of Education to issue subpoenas in investigations and hearings involving the code of conduct for New Hampshire educators. Representative Lynn, the bill sponsor, said the measure was intended to give the department standard subpoena power during investigations and in later adjudicatory proceedings, with a process for challenging overbroad subpoenas. He argued that agencies with investigative and hearing authority should also have the power to compel witnesses and documents, and said the bill was narrowed from an earlier broader draft to focus on teacher credentialing and address concerns about scope.
Members raised several concerns about whether the department already has enough authority, whether the Attorney General could handle subpoenas instead, and whether the bill creates an imbalance by giving subpoena power mainly to the investigating side. Representative Burroughs said she did not feel she had enough information and was uncomfortable with the bill, especially regarding who bears subpoena costs. Representative Biron questioned the trial analogy and whether both sides truly have equal subpoena rights. Lynn responded that the investigative stage is like a grand jury process, where only the investigating body subpoenas witnesses, while the adjudicatory stage allows both sides to seek subpoenas through the hearing officer.
Other questions focused on the bill’s scope. Representative Andreos asked what investigative authority the Department of Education already has, and Representative Organ questioned why the bill is limited to educators rather than also covering vendors, charter school boards, or the EFA scholarship organization. Lynn said the limitation to educators was deliberate, because earlier broader versions drew objections for being too expansive. Representative Tur asked whether the Attorney General could already handle such matters, and Lynn said that while the AG might be able to pursue some investigations or court subpoenas, agencies should be able to conduct their own internal investigations. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
MD
Transcript Highlights:
- Judicial Proceedings. >> Thank you very much, Mr. President.
- The Judicial Proceedings Committee will meet today at 1 p.m. for bill hearings.
- Uh, judicial<00:25:52.080>
proceedings. judicial proceedings. judicial proceedings. - The judicial<00:25:54.240>
proceedings <00:25:54.559>committee <00:25:54.799>will - ><00:25:54.960>
meet judicial proceedings committee will meet judicial proceedings committee will - ><00:25:54.960>
Summary:
The Senate convened with a quorum, heard an invocation from Reverend Carissa Serber, and journalized her remarks. Members then welcomed several guests and groups in the gallery, including Maryland Community Action Partnership advocates, Cecil College students and Dr. Mary Bolt, Cecil County Executive Adam Strait, the Maryland Association of Justice, Faith Baptist School students, and several interns and staff members. The chamber also introduced Senate Bill 585 and a bond initiative for the Active Achievers Youth Center, both of which were referred to the appropriate committees or subcommittees.
The main floor debate centered on Senate Bill 255, the Voting Rights Act of 2026 for counties and municipal corporations. Senators questioned the bill’s scope, especially whether it would affect county commissioner election methods, who could bring suit, what “vote dilution” means, and whether the measure was tied to district maps or candidate filings. The sponsor explained that the bill creates a state framework for the federal Voting Rights Act, provides standing rather than a remedy, and applies when a protected class believes its vote has been diluted; political party was said not to be a protected class. The committee amendment was adopted without objection, and the amended bill was ordered printed for third reading.
On third reading, Senate Bill 5 and Senate Bill 29 passed with constitutional majorities. Senate Bill 93 also passed. Senate Bill 141, dealing with election misinformation, disinformation, and deep fakes, was moved back to second reader for a technical amendment and then special ordered to Tuesday. The Senate also held a lighthearted recorded vote on Seahawks versus Patriots, with the Seahawks winning 28 to 8, and then received committee scheduling announcements for upcoming hearings and voting sessions.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Appropriation and Revenue. (3-18-26)
Transcript Highlights:
- For the legislative and judicial branch budgets, I'm going to speak relative to the House budget.
- Next up, we will take up House Bill 504, which is the judicial branch budget.
- There are 2% and 2% increments for all employees of the judicial branch over the course of the biennium
- which is the judicial branch budget. which is the judicial branch budget.
- branch um over the course of judicial branch um over the course of the<00:03:25.800>
biennium.
Keywords:
Meeting Start 00:00:00
Roll Call 00:00:23
HB 503 Discussion 00:01:00
HB 503 Vote 00:02:17
HB 504 Discussion 00:02:53
HB 504 Vote 00:04:48
HB 500 Discussion 00:05:19
HB 500 Vote 00:29:18
HB 900 Discussion 00:32:02
HB 900 Vote 00:33:00, 958, all
Summary:
The Kentucky Senate Appropriations and Revenue Committee met with a quorum and first took up House Bill 503, the legislative branch budget, adopting a committee substitute and reporting it favorably. The chair said the Senate version fully funds defined calculations, provides 2% raises in each fiscal year for legislative employees, removes a paragraph on operating expense reductions, and includes $1 million in the first year for a judicial branch salary study. House Bill 504, the judicial branch budget, was then amended and reported favorably; changes included 2% annual raises for judicial employees, revised operating expense language, $1 million each year for county current services, retention of Boyle County fit-up language, reporting requirements for smaller capital projects, full funding for nine judges added in 2022, and removal of furlough prohibitions and certain budget implementation language. Both bills passed the committee unanimously with favorable expressions to the floor.
The committee then considered House Bill 500, the executive branch budget, adopting a committee substitute before hearing a lengthy summary of major spending and policy changes. The chair described statewide 2% annual employee raises, agency base reductions with many exemptions, increased school safety and 911 funding, veterans and military funding, local government and severance-related changes, attorney general and auditor funding, pension and retirement system support, education funding changes including SEEK, postsecondary and scholarship provisions, public safety and corrections funding, and multiple capital projects. The chair also highlighted Medicaid-related provisions, including added waiver slots, increased state-directed payments, a 2.5% reduction in managed care vendor payments for plan years 2027 and 2028 with savings redirected to fee-for-service rates, and additional funding for behavioral health and public health programs. The bill was reported favorably after members explained their votes, with several noting they had only recently received the full 228-page bill and wanted more time for detailed review.
Finally, the committee adopted a committee substitute for House Bill 900, an appropriation measure for government agencies, and reported it favorably. The chair said the bill remains a work in progress and that one-time funding requests from across the Commonwealth and across party lines would continue to be addressed as the process moves forward. All measures considered during the meeting passed the committee with unanimous or near-unanimous favorable votes, and the meeting adjourned after no further business.