Transcript Highlights:

• I'd like to add that the Office of Cybersecurity has standards that you have to meet in order to keep
• samples. are extracted in our testing facility immediately after they race.
• Pursuant to our rules, if they meet the criteria, we can call that horse into our testing facility to
• So when you're tested after the race, your system's going to be clear of them, but you're reaping the
• That's what out of competition testing is, and that's why we do out of competition testing—to catch those

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• objective pass-fail standards. objective pass-fail standards.
• Senator Watters. test in terms of the quality of the test in terms of the quality of the water<00:08:
• Um, but in our statewide standards.
• And then when you are, standards.
• because they've met the HUD standards. because they've met the HUD standards.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's not talking about the ultimate standard of review on the merits.
• That's not talking about the ultimate standard review on the merits.
• is due to. consider what basically under the current variance standard is due to conditions of soil
• “Oh, so every zoning appeal—because de novo has been the standard for many decades—every single case
• We helped them test it. They did all the development on their nickel.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held a hybrid hearing on bills related to land use, zoning, permitting, municipal governance, and homelessness. Early testimony focused on a home rule petition for Ipswich to remove a residency requirement for a town manager, with supporters saying it would broaden the applicant pool and help fill a vacant permanent manager position. Another panel backed legislation to change the Springfield Water and Sewer Commission’s governance so ratepayers in surrounding communities would have representation, arguing the current board structure leaves many users without a voice in rate-setting and capital decisions. Several housing and zoning bills drew testimony. Senator Keenan and the Home Builders and Remodelers Association supported a bill to toll the one-year period for acting on a variance while an appeal is pending, saying appeals should not consume the time needed to implement approved projects. Representative Murray and the Real Estate Bar Association also testified on broader zoning reforms, including changes to undersized lots, merger rules, hearing deadlines, appeals, and variance standards; they argued the proposals would reduce delay and uncertainty and help housing production. Committee members questioned whether shifting zoning appeals from de novo to closed-record review would limit new evidence, and the witnesses said the change would speed cases while preserving limited opportunities to supplement the record. The committee also heard testimony on bills to end the criminalization of homelessness. Representatives, advocates, and shelter organizations said local camping bans and fines are counterproductive, especially after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Grants Pass decision, and urged a statewide response centered on housing and public health rather than punishment. Other municipal bills included remote participation in open town meetings for Wayland and a statewide local option, Fairhaven and Mattapoisett charter changes, and Cambridge’s request to use automated parking enforcement and mail parking tickets. The hearing also included testimony supporting fairground zoning flexibility, a Shrewsbury solar siting bill, and an Inspector General bill clarifying county land disposition procedures by requiring written notice to DCAM and a defined response period. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• These questions have been the gold standard for understanding food insecurity in the U.S., and in this
• Means-tested programs have a larger impact in the parts of California with relatively low costs.
• many communities, not only because of the sweeping changes in CalFresh eligibility, as my colleague test
• One timely example is the Minimum Nutrition Benefit Pilot, which tests the state's ability to provide
• But a drop-off of that magnitude would mean rolling back the SSI expansion, the asset test repeal, the

Summary: The joint informational hearing focused on CalFresh enrollment, food insecurity in California, the recent federal shutdown’s disruption of SNAP benefits, and the long-term effects of H.R. 1 on eligibility, benefits, and state and county costs. Opening remarks emphasized that millions of Californians rely on CalFresh, that the shutdown briefly delayed benefits for the first time in the program’s history, and that state and local governments, including Alameda County, stepped in with emergency food aid and funding. Members also framed the issue as both a hunger and affordability problem, with several noting that California’s agricultural abundance contrasts sharply with persistent food insecurity. The first panel presented research and advocacy perspectives on food hardship. PPIC’s Tess Thorman described food insecurity rates, disparities affecting households with children and Black and Latino households, and the role of nutrition programs in reducing poverty. Nourish California’s Betzabel Estudio argued that hunger is a policy choice and highlighted campaigns to expand state-funded food assistance for immigrants, support reentry populations, and continue the CalFresh fruit-and-vegetable incentive program. The California Association of Food Banks’ Josh Wright said food banks are seeing sustained high demand, lower federal food supplies, and cannot replace CalFresh, while urging more state support for food purchasing, school meals, and SunBucks. The second panel reviewed CalFresh operations and participation. The California Department of Social Services reported that CalFresh participation has risen over the past decade, with the state closing much of the participation gap through outreach, simplified applications, and demonstration projects such as the Elderly Simplified Application Project and a minimum nutrition benefit pilot. Alameda County Social Services described local caseloads, application trends, and emergency food distributions during the shutdown, while also warning that H.R. 1’s work requirements, immigrant eligibility restrictions, and possible cost-sharing could reduce enrollment. A student CalFresh ambassador testified about the burdensome application and recertification process and urged more funding for campus basic-needs centers and outreach to reduce stigma and administrative friction. In the final panel, county, food bank, and policy witnesses described the shutdown response and the expected impact of H.R. 1. Alameda County Community Food Bank and the County Welfare Directors Association said counties, food banks, and community partners mobilized emergency funds, pop-up pantries, and food purchasing to bridge the shutdown gap, but warned that hundreds of thousands of Californians could lose benefits under the new federal rules. The California Budget and Policy Center began outlining the scale of federal cuts, noting that H.R. 1 will significantly reduce SNAP funding and shift costs to states. No votes or formal committee actions were taken; the hearing was informational and concluded with discussion of possible state responses, including backfilling benefits, preserving outreach funding, and improving administrative systems to protect enrollment.

Transcript Highlights:

• , pre-arrival disease testing, and interagency coordination procedures.
• tiered bioontainment standards tiered bioontainment standards pre<00:49:38.640> per<00:49
• pre per arrival disease testing and pre per arrival disease testing and inter<00:49:41.200> agency
• necessary from the measurement standards necessary from the measurement standards branch.<00:54:
• and convenient standards are adequate. and convenient standards are adequate.

Bills: HB1602, HB2246, HB1707, HB2216, HB2594, HB2595, HB2155, HB2113, HB2207, HB1832, HB2015, HB2152, HB2548

Keywords: agriculture, grant specialist, financial support, farmers, Hawaii, federal grants, grant administration, revolving fund, department of agriculture and biosecurity, grant compliance, transportation, reimbursement, food security, local production, sustainability, agricultural loans, financing, Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity, Hawaii agriculture, loan portfolio

Transcript Highlights:

• Patel and reviewing his record, I do not believe you meet the Standard. Mr.
• It is a yes or no answer, and it is your first test.
• processes and the standard review by the FBI Inspections Division?
• , merits, and physical fitness standards, and those will not be changed.
• And you're going to be held to a high standard.

Transcript Highlights:

• It is a bill dealing with our lab water testing, and it identifies fees.
• We looked at UNH and how their water testing facility could assist us and whatever.
• We certainly uh supply those tested.
• sets of standards. Is that possible? sets of standards. Is that possible?
• Um two hours is just a a standard Okay.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee discussed House Bill 185, which would amend RSA 3109 to add timelines for OPLC’s complaint review and investigation process. Members reviewed the existing five-year limitation period for misconduct complaints and noted that the bill would add a 30-day deadline for the office to make a recommendation to the board and a 90-day deadline to complete investigations. Some members raised concerns that the new deadlines could conflict with the existing statute of limitations, create pressure to dismiss cases too quickly, and potentially undermine the separation between OPLC’s investigative role and the boards’ adjudicatory role established by House Bill 655. Nicholas Fry, OPLC general counsel, testified that the agency’s fiscal note originally assumed it would need roughly double its staff to meet the proposed deadlines, though a later amendment reduced that estimate somewhat. He said OPLC would still need additional personnel, including investigatory paralegals and a physician investigator for the Board of Medicine, to meet the timeframes. He also explained OPLC’s current complaint and hearing procedures, including new consumer-friendly correspondence, website guidance, and efforts by the enforcement division to improve transparency and communication with complainants and licensees. Bob Quinn of the New Hampshire Association of Realtors testified in support of the bill’s basic goal of speeding up intake and investigation, saying the 30-day intake/review period was reasonable and that the bill would not change OPLC’s role in that first step. He argued, however, that the investigation step is where delays occur, especially for lower-priority complaints, and that some cases have remained unresolved for years. Committee members also questioned how the added staffing costs would be paid, with discussion of whether they would come from license fees or the general fund. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• you<00:02:20.400> to<00:02:20.879> keep<00:02:21.120> your<00:02:21.360> test
• <00:02:22.000> testimony we ask you to keep your test testimony we ask you to keep your test
• They work under a a test for flu.
• The model was first tested in Kentucky.
• Minnesota's network adequacy standards Minnesota's network adequacy standards with<01:37:29.199>

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• I've listed out a few types of the varieties of testing that are underdone.

• > done<00:43:35.079> for each type of testing is really done for each type of testing is
• You know, program integrity, like testing, is not one thing, right?

• We take user testing really seriously.

• We take user testing really seriously.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• She says the bill does not appear to contain legally sufficient standards for grants of public money
• They are available to work with the committee to craft more specific standards and are available for
• <00:03:11.920> for contain legally sufficient standards for contain legally sufficient standards
• we have submitted some draft standards we have submitted some draft standards as<00:03:23.239>
• And with that, we are adjourned. page three of their test of their page three of their test of their

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard several measures on agriculture, energy, stadium governance, and hotel consumer protections. On SB 448 relating to agriculture, Agra Business Development Corporation and the Hawaii Farm Bureau testified in support of a proposed conservation easement acquisition in Central Oahu; the chair asked follow-up questions about the exact location, cost, and agricultural potential of the land, and the witness said the parcel had good soil and water and was former pineapple land, with cost still to be provided. On SB 827 relating to meat processing, the Department of Economic Development and Tourism said the state needs more meat-processing capacity and that any grant program should complement, not compete with, existing efforts; the Attorney General’s office warned the bill lacked legally sufficient standards for grants of public money under the state constitution and offered draft standards. Several industry and chamber witnesses supported the measure, while discussion focused on the need for brick-and-mortar or modular facilities, infrastructure costs, federal inspection needs, and access for hunters and neighbor islands. The committee then took up SB 1269 relating to geothermal resources, which drew broad support from county officials, energy consultants, utility representatives, and community advocates, with one witness opposing it. Supporters described geothermal as a viable, indigenous, firm baseload energy source that could help reduce Hawaii’s high electricity costs and support clean energy goals; one witness emphasized prior work in New Zealand and another urged the state to move forward with exploration. A DBEDT representative explained that the department is coordinating geothermal-related work with the Hawaii Technology Development Corp., the University of Hawaii, and the Hawaii State Energy Office, noting a prior $3 million appropriation, phase-one community engagement work, and plans to seek a contractor for geoscience and exploration in phase two. Members pressed DBEDT to explain how this bill fits with other geothermal measures moving through different committees, and the chair asked the department to review SB 993 and better coordinate the package of geothermal bills. On SB 1337 relating to the Stadium Authority, the stadium manager testified in support of clarifying quorum rules, explaining that the authority currently has eight seated voting members out of nine possible voting seats and that the bill would help ensure voting members are counted for quorum; he said meetings have not been delayed. Finally, on SB 883 relating to hotels, the Attorney General’s office raised First Amendment and contract-law concerns and recommended adding a purpose statement and a non-impairment savings clause. Unite Here Local 5 and other supporters said guests should be notified of hotel service disruptions such as construction, closures, or labor disputes, while opponents questioned who would enforce the law, what penalties would apply, and whether the measure could require hotels to pay damages even without a complaint. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um what we've been concerned about is that there's a double standard when it comes to creating evidence
• <00:07:08.080> when is that there's a double standard when is that there's a double standard
• stuff and like standard medical stuff and nonalopathic<00:07:16.240> therapies<00:07:16.800><
• know when to test yourself and this<00:54:10.319> helps<00:54:10.559> you.
• We don't know it till we've tested it.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up an insurance-related chronic pain bill and an amendment modeled on language from Massachusetts and Maine. The sponsor explained the amendment was developed after stakeholder meetings because the original bill would have created an unaffordable insurance mandate in New Hampshire. The amendment was intended to improve access to non-opioid therapies by limiting prior authorization and step-therapy barriers so they are not more restrictive than for other treatments, including opioid therapies. After questions, the committee took a straw vote and advanced the amendment. The next item was a department-sponsored bill involving the state’s all-payer claims database. Insurance Department officials explained that the bill would encourage self-funded employer plans to opt in voluntarily by giving them aggregated, deidentified claims information in return. They said self-funded plans cannot be required to report data because of federal law, but the bill would provide an incentive while protecting employee privacy. Members asked detailed questions about who would see the data, whether individual employees could be identified, and how privacy would be enforced; the department said access would be aggregated and deidentified, and employer privacy issues would be governed by ERISA and the U.S. Department of Labor. The committee also discussed a glucose-monitoring bill. Members debated whether the bill was aimed at type 1 diabetes coverage or broader access to continuous glucose monitors, and whether it would amount to an unnecessary insurance mandate that could raise premiums. Department testimony estimated the equipment cost and said the annual impact per member would be modest, but also noted that non-insulin therapies have not consistently shown clinically significant A1C reductions. The chair and some members emphasized that the bill should be considered on its own terms as a CGM coverage issue, not as a general diabetes mandate. The committee discussed the bill’s cost implications and asked the department for any prior cost analysis.

Transcript Highlights:

• Newborn screening in Minnesota tests for over 60 conditions that, if left untreated, can cause illness
• Gene therapies as we trials uh testing Gene therapies as we believe<00:52:47.760> these<00:52
• then would go into the standard then would go into the standard processes<00:58:58.480> representative
• This change is not about lowering the standard of care nor changing any current scope of practice to
• <01:34:52.280> of<01:34:52.480> care<01:34:53.040> nor lowering the standard

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• $300,000; Somali American Youth Enrichment Club, $600,000; Mad Dads of Minneapolis, $50,000; and a test
• $300,000; Somali American Youth Enrichment Club, $600,000; Mad Dads of Minneapolis, $50,000; and a test
• This is for that testing program. Is there discussion of the A26 amendment?
• This is for that testing program. This is for that testing program.
• that that is a separate issue standard that that is a separate issue um<00:51:17.680> and<00:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• including writing essays and other assignments in cursive in accordance with the state academic standards
• It can help with standards, aligned, less and planning.
• Space contracts, standards of excellence were using principles of obc.
• I the gold standard is going to be the person, the one to one on. And one of my first site visits.
• We have more than enough computer testing more than we need.

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill improves upon the framework of the Florida Customer Service Representative Rosenwald: Standards
• It recognizes that, barriers to the ballot box didn't stop at literacy tests.
• After Reconstruction, tools ranging from literacy tests to grandfather requirements were used to crush
• As a fact, you said that Florida is the gold standard. You remember that?
• and we will continue to be the gold standard in this state.

Transcript Highlights:

• Testing, testing. Hello? Hello? Testing, testing. We can hear y'all just fine. Oh, okay. Oh, okay.
• Testing, testing, these are coming on. Hello, hello? Hey, we have microphone. Good. I'm sorry?
• So methadone is actually the gold standard.
• Just curiously, from a policy standpoint, what would it look like to standardize care?”
• It's a completely... ...different standard that we hold people to with substance use disorders.

Summary: The task force meeting opened with new leadership announcements, including Senator Nick Schroer thanking outgoing chair Representative John Black and naming Representative Del Taylor as vice chair. After some initial technical difficulties with audio and Zoom, members reviewed the task force’s statutory charge under Missouri law: to hold hearings on substance use, explore solutions, draft or modify legislation, and produce recommendations for prevention and treatment. The chair said the goal for this year is to develop concrete legislative ideas for the next session, with hearings focused first on field experts and later on alternative therapies and the Department of Mental Health. Dr. Rachel Winograd gave the first major presentation, describing Missouri’s overdose crisis as increasingly complex and driven primarily by fentanyl, now compounded by xylazine and metatomidine. She said overdose deaths have declined for a third straight year, with preliminary 2025 data around 1,200 deaths, and attributed the decline to a smaller fentanyl supply, wider naloxone availability, and fewer young people entering use. Her main recommendations were to focus on reducing harm rather than trying to eliminate drug use, expand evidence-based medications for opioid use disorder—especially methadone and buprenorphine—improve access to naloxone, and loosen methadone regulations, including take-home doses, the federal 72-hour rule, and broader methadone units. She also emphasized that peer support, housing, transportation, and other practical supports matter, and noted that naloxone can still reverse fentanyl overdoses even when tranquilizers are present. Dr. Heidi Miller, the state medical director, followed with two recommendations: integrate substance use disorder care into whole-person health care and follow the science when considering substance-related legislation. She argued that primary care, maternal health, workforce training, EMS, public health, and methadone access should all be part of a coordinated model, and said reimbursement should support teams rather than isolated providers. She also urged stronger enforcement of parity between behavioral health/SUD and physical health coverage, and highlighted tobacco and alcohol as major, under-addressed causes of death in Missouri. Dr. Doug Burgess then reinforced the need for a coordinated continuum of care, comparing substance use treatment to the seamless system used for heart attacks, and said patients should have standardized assessment, discharge planning from day one, transition coordinators, peer recovery coaches, and better information-sharing between levels of care. Members asked questions about relapse, treatment court, EMS referral barriers, reimbursement, and whether buprenorphine can be started in the field; no votes were taken, and the meeting ended with plans to continue hearing testimony and use it to shape future policy recommendations.

Transcript Highlights:

• this there's a there's a time-t tested this there's a there's a time-t tested way<00:50:53.119><
• It's really important to set a standard for inclusive coordination to facilitate these offices and to
• ><01:32:17.520> um<01:32:17.600> to<01:32:17.760> do licensed after I pass my test
• um to do licensed after I pass my test um to do properties<01:32:18.320> management.
• <01:33:05.120> for really important to set a standard for really important to set a standard

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several shoreline easement resolutions and a water-supply study resolution. For the easement measures, the Department of Land and Natural Resources supported each item, and testimony also came from affected landowners and community members. Members asked about why some easements were granted gratis to public agencies, with DLNR explaining that those cases involved public infrastructure such as stormwater management and did not require bonds or rent. For private properties, DLNR described the standard process of monthly rent during the legislative approval gap, followed by a one-time appraised payment for a 25-year easement once the appraisal is completed. A substantial portion of the discussion focused on shoreline erosion and whether hardened shoreline structures or seawalls were contributing to beach loss. On one measure, DLNR explained that a large sandbag shoreline structure was tied to a nearby boat harbor that had altered sand movement over time, causing flanking erosion on adjacent unarmored property. On another, DLNR said a wall built under a valid 1960s permit was originally a boundary or landscaping wall, but now functions as a seawall as the shoreline has migrated landward. Members raised concerns about fairness, public beach access, and whether adjacent owners should share costs, and DLNR responded that shoreline matters are handled parcel by parcel under existing statute. The committee also heard support for a resolution creating a task force or study on desalination. DLNR’s Commission on Water Resource Management supported the intent but asked for more time to complete a comprehensive report, noting the work would require substantial staffing and coordination. The Board of Water Supply and CARES also testified in support, with CARES emphasizing future water-supply needs, cultural and historic preservation concerns, and the importance of coordinating with other agencies. DLNR said it would rely on existing studies and work with county agencies and the Department of Health. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• year or hybrid test model.
• Aqua Texas is currently working on a 2024 historical test year that closed on December 31, 2024.
• Since that test year closed, we've already spent $80 million in infrastructure.
• Similarly, under the future test year framework, these projects would proceed seamlessly.
• only had the historic test year option.

Bills: HB16, HB16, HB1618, HB2692, HB2712, HB2970, HB3609, HB3628

Keywords: judicial administration, court reform, juvenile diversion, court security, mental health services, drug offenses, constitutional amendments, water infrastructure, Texas Water Development Board, financial assistance, water supply projects, rural municipalities, water access assessment, aquifer storage, Edwards Aquifer, water injection, environmental regulations, groundwater management, San Antonio River, pollution control

Transcript Highlights:

• David, who goes on these test flights? Well, not me, Mr. Chair.
• gos on these test gos on these test flights<00:29:46.440> well<00:29:46.600> not<00
• They follow those standards really, really well.
• and guidelines about how level standards and guidelines about how to<00:58:36.440> manage<00:
• really really well the those standards really really well the demand<00:58:50.280> for<00:58:

Bills: HF1126, HF967, HF1066, HF1669, HF926

Keywords: property tax, Indian Tribe, tax exemption, Minnesota, public charity, property tax exemption, Minnesota statutes, unorganized territory, federally recognized, soil conservation, water conservation, local government aid, environmental funding, Minnesota legislation, tax credits, sustainable aviation fuel, environmental policy, corporate franchise, Minnesota taxation, tobacco

Transcript Highlights:

• Etc uh to ensure that ratios asset test Etc uh to ensure that that<00:32:01.480> those<00:32:
• features of this process standardized features of this process established<00:37:47.760> by<00
• So here we get into the ratio sheet, the asset test, which I think is current assets minus inventories
• which I think ratio sheet the asset test which I think is<00:44:31.520> current<00:44:31.960>
• Commissioner, if I may, if the grant closeout evaluation is not meeting standards, do you still make

Keywords: 1183, house