Transcript Highlights:

• It is critical that we continue to keep Minnesota a leader in the space in part by continuing the Minnesota
• It is critical that we continue to keep Minnesota a leader in the space in part by continuing the Minnesota
• It is critical that we continue to keep Minnesota a leader in the space in part by continuing the Minnesota
• It is critical that we continue to keep Minnesota a leader in the space in part by continuing the Minnesota
• It is critical that we continue to keep Minnesota a leader in the space in part by continuing the Minnesota

Bills: HF1277 , HF1006

Committee: Senate Taxes

Keywords: data centers, tax exemption, Minnesota statutes, economic development, employment growth, property tax, abatement, land bank, redevelopment, political subdivision

Transcript Highlights:

• And it fits in terms of what the funds can be used for this annual process, which actually I think launches
• I think applications launch tomorrow for the single-family and multifamily RFP.
• I think applications launch tomorrow for the single-family and multifamily RFP also allows us to match
• I think applications launch tomorrow for the single-family and multifamily RFP also allows us to match
• I think applications launch tomorrow for the single-family and multifamily RFP also allows us to match

Bills: SF2434

Committee: House Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• This launched a national market that has grown into a $28 billion industry.
• Minnesota launched a nation-leading regulatory framework and empowered many Minnesota businesses to pioneer
• This launched a national market that has grown into a $28 billion industry.
• This launched a national market that has grown into a $28 billion industry.
• This launched a national market that has grown into a 28 billion industry.

Transcript Highlights:

• years of focused research into Minnesota's overall competitiveness and prompted our organization to launch
• years of focused research into Minnesota's overall competitiveness and prompted our organization to launch
• And prompted our organization to launch the Economic Imperative for Growth, an urgent call to action
• </c><01:33:20.080><c> the</c><01:33:20.400><c> education</c> level, SHERM has launched the education
• level, SHERM has launched the education to<01:33:21.199><c> employment</c><01:33:21.679><c> or</c><01

Committee: House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• They recently launched a GIS database and project portal.
• That launched last year, and that has made the project portal... ICRIS.
• That launched last year, and that has made the process, you know, extremely quick.

Committee: House Business

Transcript Highlights:

• So USFS was able to look at visual of the column and launch aerial attack before responders... ...was
• able to look at visual of the column and launch aerial attack before responders from Kittitas 7 and
• Until now, we have just launched a project to calculate those ecosystem values, and we should have more

Summary: The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee held public hearings on several bills and a joint memorial, with testimony largely focused on steelhead recovery, agricultural viability, wildfire funding, and shellfish fees. On SB 6241, which would create a wild broodstock conservation program for steelhead, staff described a statewide program with a fiscal note of about $14.6 million in FY 2027, while sponsor Sen. Braun argued the concept could boost wild populations and fishing opportunity at lower cost than the fiscal note suggests. Proponents, including anglers and conservation groups, said broodstock programs could improve fisheries, preserve genetics, and support local economies; opponents, including Trout Unlimited, argued the bill was too broad, not sufficiently science-driven, and should be left to agency and co-manager discretion. The public hearing closed with a strong pro/con sign-in count in favor of the bill. The committee then heard SB 6104, a broad agriculture-protection bill that would require agricultural impact statements for certain agency actions, annexations, and zoning changes, and would direct mitigation measures when actions harm agricultural or natural-resource-based commercial activities. Sponsor Sen. Muzzall said Washington agriculture is under severe pressure and losing farms, while supporters from farm groups said the bill would force agencies to consider ag viability and compensate for impacts. Opponents, including a small farmer and environmental advocates, said the bill was too procedural, could burden modernization or conservation efforts, and might create uncertainty around existing conservation funding accounts. The hearing ended with more testimony in opposition than support. The committee also heard SJM 8015, urging the federal government to ensure wildfire-response consolidation does not reduce capacity or firefighter safety. Sponsor Sen. Short and many testifiers, including private forest owners, tribes, students, conservation groups, and local officials, emphasized the importance of maintaining and fully funding Washington’s wildfire response and forest-restoration investments, especially the 1168 account. Testimony highlighted fuel breaks, early detection, community protection, and the economic costs of wildfire. The memorial drew overwhelmingly pro testimony. Finally, the committee suspended the five-day notice rule to hear SB 6318 on commercial shellfish fees; staff explained it would cap Department of Health fee increases after a recent fee review, and shellfish growers strongly supported the bill as necessary to keep small farms viable. The committee also took a work session on beaver relocation and habitat restoration, where presenters described beavers as a water-retention and wildfire-resilience tool and discussed coexistence, relocation, and possible future management changes.

Transcript Highlights:

• So in enacting legislation, you can require this new agency to utilize the launch person.
• Legislation, you can require this new agency to utilize the launch program that is already under development
• Launch, which is under development now and allows you—I believe it's under development so that you're

Committee: All ALC-HOSPITAL, MEDICAID, & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE

Summary: The meeting focused on a presentation by the Alliance for Opportunity on its audit of Arkansas’s workforce and public assistance systems. Rachel Barkley, Mason Bishop, and Les Ford described a fragmented structure in which workforce programs, human services programs, and education/training programs operate in silos. They cited Arkansas data showing about 202,000 prime-age adults not engaged in the workforce, more than a million people on Medicaid/CHIP, and over 10% of the population on SNAP, while noting the state’s low labor force participation rate. They also said Arkansas has built some useful infrastructure, including integrated eligibility systems and data-sharing capacity, but argued that these tools are not yet being used to create a coordinated path to work. The presenters said local workforce boards administer only a small share of workforce dollars, mainly WIOA Title I funds, and argued that one-stop centers are funded largely by WIOA and Wagner-Peyser while other programs contribute little to service delivery. They said site visits showed frontline staff often had to “Google” community resources because they lacked referral tools, and that customers and employers alike must navigate multiple doors and agencies. They emphasized that administrative costs, duplicated staffing, separate buildings, and multiple case management systems reduce the amount of money reaching training and direct services. They also noted that most training dollars were going to limited offerings such as CDL training, and that human services employment-and-training funds were largely going to administration or subgrantees rather than direct participant support. As a solution, the presenters recommended a “one door to work” model built around three areas: a consolidated administrative structure, integrated service delivery, and integrated finances. They proposed creating a single state workforce agency that could include some public assistance functions, using a statewide eligibility and intake system, expanding case management through tools like Hope Hub, and adopting a unified cost-allocation model similar to Utah’s. They said these changes could be pursued through legislation, executive action, and federal waivers, and argued that savings would come mainly from reduced management, buildings, and duplicated systems rather than frontline layoffs. Committee members asked about costs, staffing, rural access, business engagement, and whether other states had adopted similar models. The presenters pointed to Utah, Louisiana, and Virginia as examples or partial examples, and said they would provide additional data, including a final report at the end of the month and follow-up information on Utah outcomes.

Transcript Highlights:

• We actually launched the campaign to get individual county commissions to sponsor resolutions opposing
• Instead of respecting this sacred democratic process, state lawmakers have launched a systematic attack
• Instead of respecting this sacred democratic process, state lawmakers have launched a systematic attack

Summary: The Senate Committee on Ethics and Elections heard SPB 7016, a bill revising Florida’s citizen initiative petition process to address fraud, voter information, and ballot integrity. The bill and its amendments would add sponsor bonds and deposit requirements, require more identifying information from signers and circulators, bar certain felons and non-citizens from circulating petitions, require circulator training, shorten the time to submit signed petitions, require notices to voters whose signatures are verified, and change how financial impact statements are handled. Several amendments were adopted, including a $1 million bond framework, 10-point font and page limits for petition forms, a ban on incentive-based pay tied to petition counts or speed, removal of a requirement that fraud be proven by criminal conviction before administrative fines, county deposit and payment procedures for supervisors of elections, invalidation of petitions gathered by ineligible circulators, training requirements within 30 days, and a prohibition on public funds being used to advocate for or against constitutional amendments. Committee discussion focused heavily on implementation and fairness. Supporters, including the sponsor and the Florida Chamber of Commerce, argued the bill was needed to deter fraud, protect voter information, and ensure sponsors—not taxpayers—bear the costs of the initiative process. Supervisors of elections testified that county taxpayers should not subsidize petition verification, but also warned that some provisions would be difficult to implement quickly because of software and operational constraints. Senators raised questions about the bond cost, the 10-day submission deadline, notice to voters whose petitions are invalidated, the effect on returning citizens, and whether the bill could disenfranchise voters who sign petitions in good faith. Public testimony was overwhelmingly opposed. Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, NAACP Florida, Florida Rising, Equality Florida, All Voting Is Local, and other advocates said the bill would suppress grassroots participation, criminalize volunteers, create costly barriers, and favor wealthy or corporate interests. They objected especially to the bond, the new signer identification requirements, the shorter submission window, and the lack of notice when a petition is invalidated. A few supporters, including the Florida Chamber, backed the measure as a safeguard against fraud and outside influence. After debate, the committee did not reach a final vote on the bill in the portion provided, but the bill remained before the committee as amended.

Transcript Highlights:

• We actually launched the campaign to get individual county commissions to sponsor resolutions opposing
• Instead of respecting this sacred democratic process, state lawmakers have launched a systematic attack
• Instead of respecting this sacred democratic process, state lawmakers have launched a systematic attack

Committee: Senate Ethics and Elections

Summary: The Senate Committee on Ethics and Elections met to consider SPB 7016, a major bill revising Florida’s constitutional initiative petition process. Senator Grall presented it as a fraud-prevention and ballot-integrity measure that would add sponsor training, stricter circulator rules, more voter identification information, faster submission deadlines, notice to voters whose signatures are verified, and additional civil and criminal penalties. The committee also considered several amendments, including a $1 million bond requirement, font and page limits for petition forms, restrictions on incentive-based circulator pay, removal of a criminal-conviction prerequisite for certain fines, deposit and reimbursement procedures for supervisors of elections, invalidation of petitions gathered by ineligible circulators, mandatory circulator training, and a prohibition on public funds being used to advocate for or against constitutional amendments. All of the amendments were adopted, with some roll-call votes recorded and most passing on party-line or near party-line splits. The bill drew extensive questioning from senators, especially about the practical effects of the new requirements. Senator Polsky and Senator Rouson raised concerns about disenfranchising voters, burdening grassroots volunteers, the cost of bonds and deposits, the 10-day return deadline, and whether voters would be notified if a petition they signed was later invalidated. Grall said the measures were intended to protect the constitutionally significant initiative process, reduce fraud, and ensure sponsors—not taxpayers—bear administrative costs. Dave Ramba, speaking for supervisors of elections, supported the deposit and reimbursement concepts but warned that the bill’s implementation would be operationally difficult and that software vendors might not be ready for the changes by the effective date. He also said the process should avoid subsidizing petition drives with county taxpayer money. Public testimony was overwhelmingly opposed, with speakers from Common Cause Florida, the League of Women Voters, the NAACP Florida State Conference, Florida Rising, Equal Ground, Voices of Florida, and other civic groups arguing the bill would suppress direct democracy, criminalize volunteer activity, impose excessive costs, and create confusion and litigation risk. One speaker from the Florida Chamber of Commerce supported the bill, saying the initiative process should be protected from fraud and outside interests. During debate, Senator Polsky argued the Legislature has steadily made the initiative process harder after recent citizen-led amendments succeeded, while supporters framed the bill as a necessary integrity measure. The committee had not yet taken final action on the bill itself by the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• To ensure awareness of the new requirements, we launched a comprehensive communication plan across multiple
• We're happy to say that Strong Florida Moms launched today, and you can find that website at StrongFLMoms.com
• Strong Florida Moms launched today, and you can find that website at StrongFLMoms.com.

Committee: Senate Health Policy

Summary: The Senate Health Policy Committee received updates from the Agency for Health Care Administration and the Department of Health on implementation of 2024 health care laws. AHCA reviewed progress on workforce and reimbursement measures in Senate Bill 7016 and related bills, including FRAME and TEACH funding, graduate medical education reporting, behavioral health teaching hospitals, acute hospital care at home, advanced birth centers, non-emergent care access plans, and rural emergency hospitals. Agency officials said several programs are already operational or have begun payments, while others are still in rulemaking, federal approval, or report-preparation stages. Senators asked about timing, funding reversion concerns, and whether appropriated dollars would be spent on schedule, especially for behavioral health teaching hospitals and the new birth center category. The Department of Health then reported on practitioner licensure and public health programs. MQA described implementation of the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, the Mobile Act licensure pathway, massage therapy enforcement changes, background screening expansion, liposuction safety requirements, pharmacist HIV post-exposure prophylaxis authority, and chiropractic dry needling. Public health staff updated the committee on FRAME and dental loan repayment, the Sinati screening grant program, the cancer research and innovation changes, the health care innovation council and loan program, the pediatric rare disease grant program, telehealth maternity care expansion, newborn screening for congenital CMV, the sickle cell registry and grants, and the swimming lesson voucher program. Members focused questions on how practitioners were being recruited to underserved areas, the pace of licensure approvals, and whether new programs were on track to use appropriated funds. The committee also heard a lengthy update from the Office of Medical Marijuana Use. The director reported more than 900,000 qualified patients, real-time seed-to-sale tracking now integrated across most dispensaries and labs, and ongoing compliance work on product testing, advertising, diversion, and patient safety. Senators questioned the decline in qualified physicians, how THC potency is labeled and verified, and what the agency can do about diversion to non-patients. The director said the office relies on complaints, inspections, lab audits, and coordination with law enforcement, and that patients can be suspended if violations are confirmed.

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill will will will launch<00:24:49.520><c> a</c><00:24:49.760><c> competitive</c><00:24:50.640>
• <c> RFP</c><00:24:51.440><c> process</c><00:24:52.240><c> to</c> launch a competitive RFP process to
• launch a competitive RFP process to catch<00:24:52.880><c> any</c><00:24:53.200><c> businesses</c><00
• </c><00:30:22.399><c> in</c><00:30:22.720><c> North</c> commercial kitchen space in North commercial
• kitchen space in North Minneapolis.

Committee: Senate Jobs and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:

• That again created this space and this opportunity that is a lesson for all of us to learn about how
• Like, there was not a space for us to move that bill forward, but I watched her sit with constituents
• </c> organizing an advisory board to launch organizing an advisory board to launch Emerge<03:00:58.160
• And she made space for people if they weren't there.
• </c> space for people if they weren't there. space for people if they weren't there.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:26:45.720><c> points</c><00:26:46.679><c> for</c> launching points for launching points for attack
• He sifted through the rubble at Ground Zero after 9/11, responded to the Columbia space shuttle disaster
• and I'm very pleased at this spaces and I'm very pleased at this point<05:53:17.798><c> to</c><05:53
• Number one, it is restoring a sense of order to our public spaces so that people feel safe going there
• </c> communities reclaiming our public spaces communities reclaiming our public spaces I<05:57:24.718

Bills: HR23 , HR22 , HR21

Keywords: proxy voting, remote voting, parental leave, House of Representatives, committee meetings, committee appointments, representation, legislative committees, elections, HR21, legislative process, government structure

Transcript Highlights:

• We came at House Bill 257, which I think is a very good launch into our accountability model, which we're
• We came at House Bill 257, which I think is a very good launch into our accountability model, which we're
• We came at House Bill 257, which I think is a very good launch into our accountability model, which we're
• good</c><00:42:39.200><c> a</c><00:42:39.520><c> very</c><00:42:39.760><c> good</c><00:42:40.000><c> launch
• </c> think is a very good a very good launch think is a very good a very good launch into<00:42:41.119

Committee: House Primary and Secondary Education

Transcript Highlights:

• you very much for bringing this measure forward and at least facilitating the conversations in this space
• And so that's why the priority for me and the conversations has been exactly in that space.
• Thank you for working in this space because I'm with you. I like my people. Thank you.”
• This bill responds to public outcry over games that are shut down in as little as two weeks after launch
• It's interesting because I had not thought about this particular space in this way when I'm downloading

Committee: Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection

Transcript Highlights:

• this: this would instill best practices for what we know is best for our public employees in outdoor spaces
• personal conversations were shared without my consent, and the HR and Code of Ethics Department launched
• and psychologically torment me, even using their vehicles to intimidate and threaten me in public spaces
• metabolic workload by resting, and reducing radiant heat exposure by being in the shade or a cool space
• To support these creators, I needed to be present in the digital spaces myself, playing the experiences

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development

Summary: The Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development held a lengthy hearing on June 18 focused on workers’ compensation, independent contractor and classification issues, workplace safety, warehouse worker protections, extreme temperature protections, retaliation against injured workers, and workplace bullying. Committee chairs outlined procedures for the hybrid hearing and noted that members would be leaving intermittently for floor votes. Testimony also touched on a bill to expand workers’ compensation disfigurement benefits by removing the current $15,000 cap and extending coverage beyond scars on the hands, neck, and face. A major theme was workplace safety in warehouses and in extreme heat or cold. Teamsters, warehouse workers, and labor advocates described high injury rates, strict quotas, lack of water, inadequate ventilation, frozen or missing safety equipment, and pressure to work through heat waves and snowstorms. Supporters urged favorable reports on bills protecting warehouse workers and requiring employers to adopt heat- and cold-safety plans, while the NFIB opposed the temperature bill as overly prescriptive and burdensome for small businesses. Sen. Edwards, Sen. Roche, Rep. O’Day, and others argued that the measures are needed to prevent heat illness, provide shade, water, rest breaks, training, and emergency plans, and to cover all workers regardless of immigration status. Another major subject was the “Act to Protect Injured Workers,” backed by labor groups, immigrant worker centers, legal services organizations, and individual workers. Witnesses said employers often retaliate after injuries by threatening deportation, lying about how injuries occurred, delaying care, or firing workers, and they supported stronger anti-retaliation enforcement, multilingual notices, and a rebuttable presumption of retaliation within 90 days of protected activity. The Mass AFL-CIO and immigrant advocacy groups supported the bill and opposed measures they said would weaken employee classification standards. Testimony also supported a funeral-benefits bill to raise workers’ compensation death-benefit reimbursement for burial and funeral costs, based on a family’s experience after a workplace fatality. The committee heard additional testimony on workplace bullying bills, with some witnesses urging a new legal duty for employers to prevent and respond to bullying, while others described the harms of toxic workplaces and the lack of effective remedies.

Transcript Highlights:

• don't think you Have to look very far back in the news to see what can happen from drones being launched
• That we can free up jail space for those that are higher risk, and you do that because of the consistency
• And on page four, where it says that this new language Would be a space or a section for the applicant
• Does this gonna require enough space for every other county in every other state that the person was
• Otherwise, the space may have to be very, very large for some of us that have been registered to vote

Bills: HJR1088 , HJR1090 , HJR1091 , HB1370 , SB2154 , HJR1092 , HJR1093 , HJR1095 , HJR1099 , HJR1100 , HB3021 , SB893 , SB206 , SB248 , SB259 , SB423 , SB563 , SB604 , SB633 , HJR1077 , SB667 , SB1224 , SB1257 , SB1264 , SB1319 , SB1360 , SB1437 , SB1531 , SB1543 , SB1806 , HB3004 , SB1572 , HB4342 , SB1618 , SB2 , SB237 , SB1632 , SB1687 , SB1726 , SB1859 , SB1894 , SB1461 , HB4432 , SB1948 , SB1589 , SJR52 , SR46 , HCR1030 , SB2071 , SB2182 , SB1451 , HJR1088 , HJR1090 , HJR1091 , HJR1092 , HJR1093 , HJR1095 , HJR1096 , HJR1099 , HJR1100 , SB2185 , SB893 , HB3021 , SR46 , SB206 , SB237 , SB248 , SB259 , SB423 , SB563 , SB604 , SB625 , SB633 , SB667 , SB1224 , SB1257 , SB1264 , SB1319 , SB1360 , SB1378 , SB1437 , SB1531 , SB1543 , SB1572 , SB1618 , SB1632 , SB1687 , SB1726 , SB1806 , SB1859 , SB1894 , SB1948 , SB2071 , SJR52 , HB1370 , HJR1077 , SB2 , SB1451 , SB2182 , HCR1030

Keywords: education rules, administrative rules, joint resolution, Oklahoma State Department of Education, higher education, State Regents for Higher Education, Teachers' Retirement System, charter schools, Statewide Charter School Board, career and technology education, CTE, OEQA, rule approval, legislative oversight, permanent rules, school governance, teacher retirement, education agencies, Oklahoma Register, Department of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry

Transcript Highlights:

• And it's basically protecting the good providers that I've known for decades and been in this space for
• but if that is the intention, there is a fiscal note that outlines the cost to renovate civil bed space
• There is a fiscal note that outlines the cost to renovate civil bed space and accommodate an additional
• Non-statute necessarily per se, but if we do what this bill is asking us to, is there physical space,
• Governor Brewer, all the way back in 2011, launched the first Alzheimer's Task Force.

Committee: House House Health & Human Services Committee of Reference

Summary: The committee heard several bills related largely to Arizona’s behavioral health and Access system, plus a fertility coverage mandate, a state hospital admissions bill, and a naturopathic scope-of-practice bill. SB 1114 would appropriate $1 million to the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office for investigations into behavioral health patient brokering; the sponsor described ongoing fraud involving vulnerable Native American patients, while some members questioned why the Attorney General was not handling the work. The bill passed 10-1 with one present. SB 1116 would require claim denials and appeal determinations for American Indian Health Program behavioral health services to be reviewed by someone with at least two years of relevant clinical experience; Access said it was neutral but raised concerns about vague language and added staffing needs, and the bill passed 7-4 with one present. SB 1346 would require Access to notify providers of claim deficiencies within 72 hours and approve or deny corrected claims within 10 business days; supporters said it would reduce long delays and unpaid claims, while Access said it would need more staff and system changes. The bill passed 7-5. The committee also approved SB 1347, which requires insurance coverage for fertility preservation services for cancer patients of reproductive age whose treatment is likely to cause infertility, with a religious-employer exemption. Supporters, including cancer survivors and an advocacy representative, said the bill protects patients who must make rapid decisions before treatment begins; insurers were neutral. The bill passed unanimously 12-0. SB 1813 would require the Arizona State Hospital to admit patients based on clinical need rather than county of residence, effectively ending the Maricopa County cap tied to the Arnold v. Sarn settlement. Supporters argued the cap leaves seriously ill patients waiting in other facilities for long periods, while ADHS warned of possible litigation and rural access concerns; the bill passed 9-2 with one present. Finally, the committee began hearing SB 1178, which would allow naturopathic physicians to administer certain antibiotics, antivirals, and antifungals intravenously. The sponsor argued naturopaths should be able to practice to the full scope of their training amid physician shortages, while the Arizona Medical Association and osteopathic representatives opposed the bill, saying IV antimicrobials are high-risk therapies that require hospital-level training, monitoring, and stewardship. Testimony focused on patient safety, appropriate setting, and whether the bill should be narrowed or amended; no vote on SB 1178 was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• And it's basically protecting the good providers that I've known for decades and been in this space for
• There is a fiscal note that outlines the cost to renovate civil bed space and accommodate an additional
• And not leave any space for anybody else in the state. Is that correct?
• ...non-statute necessarily per se, but if we do what this bill is asking us to, is there physical space
• Governor Brewer, all the way back in 2011, launched the first Alzheimer's Task Force.

Bills: SB1095 , SB1114 , SB1116 , SB1162 , SB1164 , SB1178 , SB1179 , SB1249 , SB1253 , SB1346 , SB1347 , SB1446 , SB1561 , SB1813

Committees: House Health & Human Services , House House Health & Human Services Committee of Reference

Keywords: gender transition, minors, irreversible surgery, health professionals, puberty-blocking drugs, medical procedures, prohibition, Arizona Revised Statutes, behavioral health, patient brokering, appropriation, state funds, Maricopa County, claims review, medical necessity, American Indian health program, healthcare regulations, healthcare compliance, behavioral health technicians, licensing

Transcript Highlights:

• A good example would be the T-App, which was an app that launched here in the United States.
• And so there’s a strong fear on that front, and then there’s that coupled by the restraints on shelf space
• folks about the need for a trade association to represent the cultivators and manufacturers in this space
• So Stryker, who we are representing, and many other companies in this space, did not know they needed
• to be licensed in the state, and not... ...other companies in this space did not know they needed to

Bills: SB1176 , SB1186 , SB1235 , SB1286 , SB1446 , SB1458 , SB1515 , SB1616 , SB1641 , SB1668 , SB1670 , SB1678 , SB1747 , SB1787

Committee: Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Keywords: stormwater, water storage, replenishment credits, groundwater, aquifer, Arizona Revised Statutes, disclosure, state contracts, procurement records, donations, transparency, EMS, reciprocity, interstate compact, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, licensure, public safety, military personnel, veterinary telemedicine