Video & Transcript Research : 'legislative testimony'

Page 13 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Leg Committee Meeting - 2026-03-18

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • committee provided MHC last legislative committee provided MHC last legislative session<00:04:53.759
  • In with the legacy enabling legislation.
  • again, because the way the legislation again, because the way the legislation is<00:40:23.200>
  • it's an important piece of legislation it's an important piece of legislation in<01:03:47.680>
  • <01:08:43.120> to allowed legislators to allowed legislators to give<01:08:44.799> their
Bills: HF4148
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, February 19, 2026

Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, and if not, we'll open it up to public testimony. I believe State Lands Office is here.
  • Appreciate your testimony. Any questions for the Office of State Lands? >> Go ahead.
  • Appreciate your testimony. >> Thank you. Appreciate your testimony.
  • We had a lot of streamlining of past legislation and statute.
  • Appreciate your testimony. >> Further testimony. >> Mr. McGna. >> Thank you, Mr.
Bills: HJ0002, SF0118, SF0016
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:02:43.440> measures up, we have some legislative measures up, we have some legislative
  • <00:15:49.040> session together in the last legislative session together in the last legislative
  • > know,<01:09:00.400> the previous testimony, you know, the previous testimony, you know
  • <01:09:59.760> to that Airbnb supports legislation to that Airbnb supports legislation to
  • <01:14:46.960> and we tried to do a fix legislatively and we tried to do a fix legislatively
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from its June 4, 2025 meeting and then heard a series of presentations focused largely on housing and land-use policy. Senator Robbie Mills and Representative Josh Bray discussed two 2025 housing measures: Senate Bill 50, which would create residential infrastructure development districts to help local governments finance infrastructure for new housing developments through special assessments and local debt, and House Bill 7, which would let local governments identify development areas and rebate new property tax revenue to developers as an incentive for housing growth. They said Kentucky faces a statewide housing shortage of roughly 210,000 units, projected to grow if building patterns do not change, and argued that regulatory relief and financing tools are needed to increase supply. Representative Rebecca Rymer presented House Bill 371, which would require local permitting when an industry’s residual waste landfill is located in a different county from the industry itself. She said current law lets such landfills bypass local review, leaving host counties with no say despite road impacts and other local burdens. She said the bill would preserve the existing exemption when the landfill and industry are co-located, and noted support from KLC and KO. Representative Steve Doan also described House Bill 806, a statewide backyard chicken bill that would allow domesticated hens, prohibit roosters, set a minimum of six hens that local governments could not go below, and preserve local authority over setbacks, sanitation, maintenance standards, and egg sales. He said it would override outright local bans but not HOA restrictions, and cited a current Northern Kentucky dispute and ADA litigation as reasons for the proposal. The committee then heard a broader discussion on housing and land use from Charlie Gardner of the Mercatus Center and Nolan Gray of California YIMBY and the Bluegrass Institute. They outlined categories of land-use regulation, described the recent growth of state-level housing reforms nationwide, and cited examples such as ADU legalization, smaller lot sizes, reduced parking minimums, streamlined permitting, and single-stair or other building-code reforms. They argued that housing shortages are a statewide concern, that localities often have incentives to block growth, and that state intervention can reduce costs and uncertainty without compromising health and safety. Members asked about the housing shortage estimate, the effect of red tape on safety and local authority, and how state reforms could be phased in; the presenters said reforms often include lead time, can be targeted to larger jurisdictions, and should focus on reducing time and cost while maintaining basic standards.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 22nd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Give us your testimony.
  • Public testimony is closed, and House Bill 5115 is left pending.
  • Hearing none, the chair opens public testimony on HB 4081, closes public testimony, and leaves HB 4081
  • Hearing none, the chair opens up public testimony and closes public testimony and leaves it.
  • House Bill 119 hearing none, the chair opens up public testimony and closes public testimony and leaves
Bills: HB223
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs heard several House bills, with most measures left pending after testimony and later taken up in a batch of votes. Early in the meeting, HB 5624 on liability protections for motocross/off-road vehicle tracks, HB 223 on requiring competitive procurement for municipal lobbying contracts, HB 3709 on post-election audit procedures, and HB 5081 on protecting personal information of judicial officers and court staff were all discussed and left pending after testimony. Witnesses on HB 223 supported greater transparency in municipal lobbying contracts. HB 3709 drew sharp opposition from an election integrity advocate who argued the bill would reduce precinct-level granularity and make it harder to detect ballot errors, while a Secretary of State resource witness said the bill would simplify and standardize the audit process by location. HB 5081 received strong support from court administration and a district judge who described prior threats and an attack tied to publicly available personal information. The committee also heard HB 3546 on allowing school districts to move elections to November, HB 493 on barring certain felony offenders from serving as poll watchers, HB 5115 on increasing penalties for election fraud and related conduct, HB 4081 on trade secret filing procedures, HB 3909 on limiting restrictions on wireless devices at polling places, HB 2702 on limiting gubernatorial closure authority for certain veterans organizations during pandemics, HB 119 on foreign adversary lobbying, and HB 5138 on the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute election crimes. Several of these bills were explained with committee substitutes and then left pending before final action. Testimony on HB 493 and HB 5115 came from an election integrity advocate who supported both bills, saying the poll watcher restriction was appropriately narrowed and that the election fraud bill would help address invalid votes and refusal to count valid votes. Later, the committee took up pending business and voted out a large number of bills, generally along party lines or with broad support. HB 186 on minors’ social media use, HB 229, HB 2885, HB 3909 as substituted, HB 4285, HB 1661, HB 2820, HB 3181, HB 4157, HB 223, HB 521, HB 640, HB 1234, HB 2253, HB 2294, HB 3053, HB 3697 as substituted, HB 4281, HB 4463, HB 4995, HB 5081 as substituted, HB 5624 as substituted, HB 119 as substituted, HB 3225, HB 5138 as substituted, HB 5115, HB 481 as substituted, HB 3546, HB 493, and HB 4145 were reported favorably to the full Senate, with several also placed on the local and uncontested calendar. The committee also adopted committee substitutes for multiple bills, including HB 3909, HB 5081, HB 5624, HB 119, HB 5138, and HB 481. At the end, the chair noted another committee meeting would likely be needed before deadlines, possibly on a weekend, and recessed the committee subject to the call of the chair.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Ways & Means

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • LaGoree from Legislative District 5.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • I think we can without having this in legislation.
  • Do I like more legislation? Absolutely not.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • Thanks for your testimony.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • Thanks for your testimony. Mr. Rudolph, give us your position on the bill and your testimony. Mr.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
Bills: HB223
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We will open up public testimony on House Bill 5624.
  • Royce Poinsett has registered to provide testimony.
  • Thank you all for your time and testimony.
  • Hearing none, the chair opens up public testimony on House Bill 4081 and closes public testimony.
  • Hearing none, the chair opens up public testimony, closes public testimony, and leaves the substitute
Bills: HB223
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26 - Part 2

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh our legislation forward. uh Edvite.
  • is<00:13:25.040> passed, So when this legislation is passed, So when this legislation
  • So, thank you very your great testimony.
  • I haven't heard any testimony today in support of that.
  • I haven't heard any testimony today in support of that.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26 - Part 1

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We appreciate your interest and participation in the legislative process.
  • Those providing testimony will be given specific time limits, which must be strictly observed.
  • Those providing testimony<00:00:54.640> will<00:00:54.800> be<00:00:54.879> given
  • ><00:00:55.120> specific<00:00:55.520> time testimony will be given specific time testimony
  • <00:23:38.000> and deals with the safety of legislators and deals with the safety of legislators
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Larsen, I'm director of the Legislative Larsen, I'm director of the Legislative Budget<00:53:48.880
  • Um, both for agencies and Legislative Um, both for agencies and Legislative Budget<00:57:08.440>
  • I'm just wondering legislation.
  • requirement both for the Legislative requirement both for the Legislative Budget<01:12:06.640>
  • It... time, and you have written testimony time, and you have written testimony reflecting<01:30:01.440
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 14th, 2026 at 04:37 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Natalie Faustle with Accel in Action, and we are here to say that we want you to support this great legislation
  • We are here to say that we want you to support this great legislation.
  • We were proud supporters of the legislation last year and are very excited to see the improved language
  • We could or will define some of these things further in rule after the legislation is passed.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 13th, 2026 at 04:06 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • This legislation is one that we, of course, support.
  • There was very little need for that legislation.
  • This legislation is taking a proactive step to prevent that intimidation.
  • This legislation is not targeting intimidation threats or criminal conduct.
  • County clerks, are they in support of your legislation? Do you know? Mr.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • the date of final adjournment of the special legislative session.
  • The uh and these special sessions have repeatedly turned into many legislative sessions.
  • Very little public awareness of this kind of legislation.
  • Seeing no questions, we'll open public testimony on Senate Bill 54.
  • Seeing and hearing none, public testimonies closed. 54. 54 years.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House and Governmental Affairs Apr 29th, 2026

House and Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Carter's testimony?
  • The governor initiates the legislation before the legislative violation...
  • So the governor initiates the legislation before the legislative bodies to remove this judge?
  • I will get with a legislative auditor because generally we don't duplicate what the legislative auditor
  • With a legislative auditor, because generally we don't duplicate what the legislative auditor does.
Summary: The House and Governmental Affairs Committee heard Senate Bill 123 by Sen. Morris, a proposed constitutional amendment to create a legislative-address process for removing certain judges for cause, with the governor certifying removal after a legislative vote and Senate trial. The bill was presented as a way to address perceived gaps and ambiguity in the current Constitution between impeachment provisions and the Judiciary Commission’s authority over judicial discipline. The committee also adopted a technical amendment (Amendment Set 4708) that renumbered paragraphs for clarity. Sen. Morris and supporters argued the measure is needed because current mechanisms have not adequately held judges accountable in serious cases. They cited several criminal cases, especially involving juveniles and electronic monitoring failures, and said the bill would provide a last-resort remedy for gross misconduct, incompetence, or malfeasance. Multiple family members of murder victims testified in support, including Anna Carter, James Carter, and Tracy Carter, who described the death of Jacob Carter and said the case showed a failure of oversight and accountability. Reverend Rodney Wood also spoke in support, describing another case he believed reflected a grave injustice. Committee members raised concerns about separation of powers, due process, political misuse, and whether the bill would reach beyond judges to district attorneys. Some questioned the mechanics of the proposed process, the role of the governor, the Senate trial, and whether the Judiciary Commission and existing impeachment provisions should instead be strengthened or clarified. The ACLU testified in opposition, saying the bill had technical inconsistencies in its vote threshold language, could be addressed by testing existing impeachment authority first, and should not single out judicial discretion while excluding DA discretion. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.