Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial transparency'

Page 13 of 453
AL
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/20/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm here today to present House File 414, a bill that seeks to ensure fairness, promote transparency,
  • In conclusion, this bill ensures fairness, promotes transparency, increases accountability.
  • <00:04:03.040> and toward promoting transparency and toward promoting transparency and accountability
  • It gives greater judicial discretion.
  • <01:10:41.360> discretion it gives greater judicial discretion it gives greater judicial discretion
Bills: HF414, HF768, HF359
HI
Bills: SB2057
Summary: The Judiciary Committee met on Thursday, March 5, for a series of decision-making agendas and considered a long list of Senate bills. Early measures included SB 2151, which clarifies state and local authority during emergencies and revises the definition of “emergency”; the committee agreed to restore the broader, long-used definition and add a sunset date, then passed the bill with amendments. SB 3055, concerning false impersonation of an employee organization representative, was amended to remove liquidated damages and passed. Several technical or conforming bills also advanced, including SB 3067, SB 3077, SB 3131, SB 3134, SB 3144, SB 3152, SB 3154, and SB 3249, with most passed with technical amendments or unamended; some members noted reservations on SB 3249. The committee also took up bills affecting public safety, health, and education. SB 3083 was amended to narrow notice requirements for protective orders involving military-affiliated individuals to a designated military security force, and SB 3118 on the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children passed as is. SB 3134 modernized emergency medical services statutes, while another SB 3134 item addressed dangerous intoxication and civil protective custody. SB 3262, requiring the Hawaii State Teachers Board to submit nominees to the Board of Education, was amended to include a defective effective date. SB 3315, allowing a one-time medical cannabis purchase while registration is pending, was also amended to a delayed effective date and passed. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on law enforcement and immigration-related proposals. SB 3322, which restricts facial coverings by law enforcement, requires visible identification, and sets agency policies on cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, was amended to remove an affirmative defense, make the penalty a misdemeanor, and incorporate exceptions for undercover work and related preparation; it passed with one no vote. SB 3251, barring certain former ICE and Border Patrol personnel from employment in specified state agencies, was narrowed to apply to those with more than 90 cumulative days of such work during a defined period and passed with reservations. SB 2057, a reconsideration measure limiting use of state personnel and funds to assist federal immigration agents beyond their authority, was further amended to clarify definitions, protect First Amendment activity, and preserve cooperation required by federal law; it then passed without objection. The committee adjourned after adopting each measure considered.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections May 5th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Moreover, the current law creates confusion about judicial responsibilities.
  • If they do those four things, they have judicial immunity. ...is intact.
  • I have the letter in front of me from the Judicial Advisory Council.
  • So how does someone get on the Judicial Advisory Council?
  • So, a lot of the major cities are not represented on the Judicial Advisory Council.
Bills: SB663, SB958
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's what the judicial discretion is there for. Again, you know, just practicing.
  • I think really, you know, the... think really, you know, the judicial discretion really does clear up
Bills: HB265, HB146, SB254, HB202, HB3, HB42, SB18
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • I commit to being transparent about what order we will Vote on bills and how I will manage proceedings
  • Additionally, S.371, the SBA Disaster Transparency Act, complements S.300 and aims to bring further transparency
  • Together, these two bills increase transparency and hold SBA accountable to the American public.
  • I'm pleased to join Senator Scott in introducing the SBA Disaster Transparency Act.
  • We must have increased transparency to prevent this from happening again.
Bills: SB298, SB300, SB371
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Mar 18th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • When I first read it, it seems like it's our attempt to not— we're all about transparency; at least we
  • all should be about transparency—about not wanting the truth to be told to the public.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 2nd, 2026 at 09:12 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • what's actually happening in reality, but also looking for opportunities to make it easier and transparent
  • a strong understanding of public service and the responsibility that came With it, she values transparency
  • Now, what makes this land grant unique, Madam Chair, is that it's governed by the Fourth Judicial District
  • But I like the transparency in this.
  • I just wish we were not hypocritical with other transparency in our state government of hiding data from
Bills: SM13, SM14
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 30th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • You got to love the last judicial hearing. I said motion. Yeah.
  • I didn't want to say anything because you're my senator and things, but I want to be transparent about
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • and allow denied or delayed payments to be appealed to the presiding judge of the administrative judicial
Summary: The Senate Committee on Jurisprudence heard several family-law and probate bills. Senate Bill 2052 would codify a rebuttable presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of a child and require clear and convincing evidence to overcome that presumption in disputes involving non-parents; the author and several witnesses supported the bill as a clarification of existing case law, while one witness suggested refining the modification language. Public testimony was closed and the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1923, which would allow child support to follow a child placed temporarily with kin or fictive kin under a parental child safety placement or authorization agreement; the bill’s author and a grandparent caregiver testified in support, while one witness suggested the Attorney General could handle the change administratively. That bill was also left pending. Senate Bill 1838 would standardize fee schedules and compensation rules for attorneys ad litem and related court-appointed counsel in DFPS child-protection cases. The author said the bill would clarify unclear current law, and witnesses from the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and family-defense bar supported it, though one asked that expert-witness expenses be expressly included. Senate Bill 387 would raise the bond requirement for county judges handling guardianship proceedings to at least $500,000; the author described it as a refiling of a prior bill that passed unanimously but was vetoed, and a statutory probate judge testified in support. Senate Bill 1839 would require original or paper wills to be delivered to the transferee court when probate proceedings are transferred; the committee substitute broadened the delivery methods, and the district clerk witness supported the change. All three bills were left pending. The committee also took up Senate Bill 1536, which had previously been voted out with the wrong committee substitute; members reconsidered the vote, adopted the corrected substitute, and then voted 3-0 to report the bill favorably to the full Senate, with local and contested calendar certification. Finally, Senate Bill 1940 would create a transfer-on-death mechanism for manufactured homes classified as personal property, similar to existing tools for real property and vehicles; the author and an estate-planning attorney testified that it would streamline transfers and reduce probate costs. A non-substantive committee substitute was still being prepared, and the bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Health Mar 17th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • requiring parental consent for data collection, banning harmful targeted advertising, and ensuring transparency
  • There's been a lot of work done on price transparency, lowering healthcare costs, and making insurance
  • To promote, uh, good governance and bring transparency and accountability to government, and we've had
  • Uh, because I think it's important for transparency and anybody who might be watching.
Bills: HB163, HB 296
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I heard about this hearing through hearsay and rumor, not via proper transparent channels, not through
  • But these efforts to evade judicial review only emphasize how deeply discriminatory this bill is.
  • So we may not need to blow a hole through transparency to fix this problem.
  • So we may not need to blow a hole through transparency to fix this problem.
  • Transparency is essential.
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Feb 26th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Before you, House Bill 362 is an expansion of the judicial carry standards to retired municipal judges
  • We're also proposing in this bill to have... remediation companies do some price transparency by posting
  • basically, what it does is change the name to a Homeowner Contract Act instead of the Home Warranty Transparency