Video & Transcript Research : 'cost control'

Page 13 of 500
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Education Policy Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • no cost. no cost.
  • There's no cost for you. There's no cost for you to take it back. >> Yeah, it would be no cost.
  • . >> No, it will not be a cost.
  • , that tag at no cost, that tag at no cost, >> right?
  • >> It won't be no cost. >> It won't be no cost.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 5th, 2026 at 04:07 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • I just want to know what my eggs are going to cost next month.
  • There were some additional costs.
  • We added $63 million in health care affordability fund to lower costs and protect access, to help shield
  • potential changes to Medicaid and other health programs, support coverage transitions, and address cost
  • allocating federal money for child care assistance, increasing funding for pre-K to bring down the cost
Bills: SB145, SB143
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 5th, 2026 at 10:08 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Four things are on this front page: a sustained center, sustained workforce, cost-effective ecosystem
  • To win, we must make New Mexico also cost effective for industry.
  • A quantum tax rebate is one component of cost effectiveness, but cost effectiveness is not all about
  • And the asset costs and the equipment costs are so high.
  • And the asset costs and the equipment costs are so high that you're just leveraged and you don't sleep
Bills: SB145, SB143
TX
Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources met with a quorum present and took up several bills, mostly as pending business. HB 1089, creating the Gulf Coast Protection Account to be administered by the General Land Office, was laid out as the House companion to SB 795; Senator Alvarado moved it be reported favorably, and it passed the committee 8-0. The committee also adopted a committee substitute for HB 2970 and then reported it favorably 9-0, despite the motion wording recommending the substitute in lieu of the original bill. HB 2890, HB 1238, and HB 206 were each laid out and reported favorably to the full Senate by 9-0 votes. For each bill reported favorably, members also approved motions to place the bill on the local and uncontested calendar, with no objections. The transcript reflects brief procedural repetition and some garbled audio, but the actions are clear: the committee advanced all measures considered during the meeting without recorded opposition. The chair then announced there was no further business and the committee stood in recess subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources (Part I) May 7th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, of course, streamlining processes, leveraging technology, and reducing costs are win-win scenarios
  • It costs money and prolongs the application process.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources met with a quorum initially lacking, then took up several bills and heard brief testimony. HB 206, by Rep. Craddick, would prohibit counties from requiring cash bonds as a condition for pipeline construction approvals, while still allowing other forms of financial assurance; the sponsor and a Target Pipeline witness said cash-bond mandates create unnecessary costs and uncertainty, and the bill was left pending. HB 2890, by Rep. Patterson, would create an interstate compact among Gulf Coast states to coordinate and support the liquefied natural gas industry; the sponsor emphasized LNG’s economic importance and said the bill mirrors prior compact language that does not require congressional approval, and it was left pending after no public testimony. HB 1238, by Rep. Geren, would let TCEQ use third-party inspection reports and remote technology when reviewing proposed Class I injection wells; the sponsor and a uranium industry witness said it would streamline regulation and support industry, and it was left pending. HB 2970, by Rep. Paul, the House version of SB 410, would require the Gulf Coast Protection District’s final gate design to accommodate two-way vessel traffic and allow the governor to appoint the district’s presiding officer; the committee substitute was explained and the bill was left pending. With members scattered in other committees, the chair said the committee would recess and later reconvene to vote and complete its work.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Tue Mar 31, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Contractor costs will go up. gone up. Contractor costs will go up.
  • You've heard concerns about cost and complexity. The cost of underinsurance already exists.
  • <01:20:02.000> The not whether there is a cost. The not whether there is a cost.
  • the cost to rebuild or replace. the cost to rebuild or replace.
  • cost and value of said improvements. cost and value of said improvements.
Summary: The committee first heard HCR 168 and HR 158, which would create a temporary working group to study utility capacity, coastline infrastructure lifespan, and the costs of needed expansions. Public Utilities Commission staff said the commission was not the right entity to direct all of the work because it lacks authority over many affected agencies. Members discussed whether the study should be limited to a coastal area or broadened to the whole island, and in decision-making the committee amended the measure to focus on the County of Honolulu, correct references to the Public Utilities Commission, and revise the working group membership to include the PUC chair, legislative designees, and directors or designees from DLNR, DOT, HIEMA, and DCCA Consumer Advocacy. The committee then passed both resolutions with amendments; the vote was adopted unanimously, with some members excused. The committee next considered HCR 145 and HR 137, which would convene a working group on climate change impacts on insurance availability and affordability. The Insurance Division stood on its written comments, the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission supported the intent, and the Attorney General opposed the measure, warning that a working group could create discoverable materials that might complicate the state’s climate litigation and noting a technical ambiguity in the reference to the Hawaii Hurricane Relief Fund administrator. After questions about discovery and the lawsuit, the committee amended the resolutions to replace the administrator reference with the chair of the Hawaii Hurricane Relief Fund Board of Directors, remove the Attorney General as convener while keeping the office as a member, and have the working group share findings and recommendations with the House CPC and Senate CPN committees instead of issuing a report. The committee passed the measures with amendments, with Rep. Martin voting with reservations. In the later agenda, the committee heard SB 2607, SD 1 on landscape architect licensure. The Board of Professional Engineers, Architects, Surveyors, and Landscape Architects supported the bill, explaining it modernizes licensure requirements to align with national standards and clarifies the profession’s design-focused role. The bill was discussed as distinguishing landscape architecture from groundskeeping and from civil engineering drainage work. No opposition was heard. The committee also heard SB 2031, SD 2 on consumer protection and price transparency for live ticket events and short-term lodging. The Office of Consumer Protection supported the bill, saying it largely mirrors an FTC rule requiring all-in pricing and would give the state enforcement authority and remedies. The Hawaii Financial Services Association opposed the bill as drafted and sought a limited exemption for credit card issuers relying on third-party hotel information, while the Hawaii Hotel Alliance supported the measure but asked for language deeming compliance with the federal rule sufficient for short-term lodging. Committee members questioned whether those proposed exemptions would conflict with federal law or weaken state enforcement, and the discussion focused on preemption, liability, and the value of state remedies such as restitution.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Governmental Oversight and Accountability Jan 20th, 2026

Governmental Oversight and Accountability

Transcript Highlights:
  • Retirees in the special risk class will receive an alternative cost-of-living adjustment of 1.5 percent
Bills: S0774, S7028, S7024, S7026
Summary: The Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability met and first heard Senate Bill 774, which would extend workers’ compensation medical benefits for employment-related mental or nervous injuries to 911 public safety telecommunicators, even without a physical injury. The sponsor and several dispatchers, a clinician, and communications directors testified in support, describing repeated exposure to traumatic calls, chronic understaffing, and the need for mental health treatment and retention support. Senator DiCeglie and Chair Mayfield praised dispatchers’ work, and the bill was reported favorably by committee vote, with Senator McClain later recorded as voting yes on the bill. The committee then took up SPB 7028, a retirement bill that sets Florida Retirement System employer contribution rates beginning July 1, 2026, leaves the 3% employee contribution unchanged, allows certain elected officers to receive a DROP payout under specified conditions, and provides a 1.5% alternative cost-of-living adjustment for eligible special risk retirees. Firefighters, police, sheriffs, and chiefs’ groups spoke in support, emphasizing recruitment and retention. The committee voted to submit the proposal as a committee bill and reported it favorably. Finally, the committee considered SPB 7024 and SPB 7026, both open-government-related bills. SPB 7024 would repeal the current public records and public meeting exemption for cybersecurity information and consolidate agency-specific cybersecurity exemptions into one agency-wide exemption. SPB 7026 would repeal the current public records exemption for trade secrets held by an agency and similarly consolidate specific trade secret exemptions into one agency-wide exemption. Neither bill drew testimony or debate, and both were submitted as committee bills and reported favorably. The meeting then adjourned.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Health Committee Apr 23rd, 2025

Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB491 would create unnecessary regulatory burdens, cost, consumer and retailer confusion, and undermine
  • There are other ways you can achieve colors without these dyes, but it's a little more cost-prohibitive
  • All kidding aside, this bill that I'm bringing forward today has to do with remembering that cost is
  • obviously a... ...remembering that cost is obviously a concern in healthcare, but it shouldn't be the
  • providers are not... ...that healthcare providers are not gagged in any way and can talk freely about the costs
Bills: SB87, HB491, SB43, SB101
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, counties are required to pay for the cost of the traveling judge.
  • the district court free, but if the state or members representing the state request it, there is a cost
  • And if you didn't really need it, it's going to cost you.
  • If you did need it, it's also going to cost you.
  • Typically, if they do request it, the estate is large enough to incur that cost.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, counties are required to pay for the cost of the traveling judge.
  • But if the A state or members representing the state requested, it's a cost of up to $50,000 per per
  • If you didn't need it, it's going to cost you.
  • So, um, it costs, local, there's only 12 counties with a permanent probate judge.
  • Typically if they do request it, the state's large enough to have that cost incurred.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Mar 19th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Biggest cost drivers and biggest complaints is the cost of insurance. HB 138.
  • It has an impact on premiums because it increases overall costs, so we have to cover the cost.
  • health insurance costs.
  • Cost matters. Let's be clear. When we make decisions in this room, cost is relevant.
  • The amount of the cost data?
Bills: HB138, HB335, HB388, HB138
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Mar 19th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We don't have any long-term data on does that cost offset the benefit.
  • Cost. Cost to us that the consumer that's buying the insurance will have to pay for. Yeah.
  • Yeah, so if we could. capture any more cost to make sure that we have those costs in place and you're
  • But if this cost is already included and the fees you're getting now.
  • And I would imagine, you know, utilization and the cost of those benefits drive. premium cost so.
Bills: HB138, HB335, HB388, HB138
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Mar 18th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The goal is that they have full notice of the cost of buying debt, and many times you... ...the cost
  • This piece of legislation is not going to take down the cost of eggs.
  • Not going to take down the cost of eggs.
  • If you retire, you have received your cost of living or whatever, but you're...
  • Since it's with the county, they don't have local control.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/23/26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So we know in this committee if fertilizer goes up, food costs are going to rise, and if food costs rise
  • So we know in this committee if fertilizer goes up, food costs are going to rise, and if food costs rise
  • So we know in this committee if fertilizer goes up, food costs are going to rise, and if food costs rise
  • <00:19:04.559> of<00:19:04.720> production below cost of production below cost of production
  • protect folks who really have no control protect folks who really have no control over<00:25:13.039
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, of course, streamlining processes, leveraging technology, and reducing costs are win-win scenarios
  • This is time-consuming, it costs money, and prolongs the application process.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:20:09.280> oral<00:20:09.679> pharmaceuticals<00:20:10.480> like controlled
  • I believe the cost is around $1,400 for them to take the part one.
  • What’s the difference in cost for the Canadian test?
  • What is the cost for a student Pearson.
  • difference in cost for the Canadian<00:36:48.240> test?
Summary: The subcommittee approved the minutes from the previous meeting and then took up several regulations. The first was a Department of Veterans Affairs regulation, with a staff amendment, to allow nurse practitioners to apply for the Veterans Affairs nurse loan repayment program year-round and to make technical drafting changes. The committee heard from the Office of Kentucky Veteran Centers, then adopted the staff amendment and approved the regulation without objection. The main item of the meeting was the Board of Optometric Examiners’ proposed amendment to 201 KAR 5:010, which would allow applicants to use the Optometry Examining Board of Canada written exam in place of part one of the National Board of Examiners in Optometry exam for licensure. The board said the change would improve access to care, provide an additional pathway for Canadian-trained candidates, and still require applicants to pass the remaining national board parts. Opponents, including NBEO officials, ARBO, Pearson VUE, and several optometrists, argued the Canadian exam is not equivalent, does not test the same biomedical science content, is not validated for U.S. scope of practice, and raises concerns about test security, transparency, and portability across states. They urged the committee to find the amendment deficient or vote no. Committee members questioned both sides about prior communication with the board, whether Kentucky would be the first state to adopt such a change, the rationale for the proposal, and the cost difference between the exams. Supporters said the board had received some written comments and one phone call, and that the proposal was driven by access concerns and the presence of Canadian students. Opponents said they had not had direct discussions with the Kentucky board before the hearing. No final vote on the optometry regulation is reflected in the transcript excerpt, but the committee heard extensive testimony and rebuttal before moving on.