Video & Transcript Research : 'Legislative Council'

Page 13 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Ways & Means

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm Representative Sarah LaGoree from Legislative District 5.
  • LaGoree from Legislative District 5.
  • I think we can without having this in legislation.
  • Do I like more legislation? Absolutely not.
  • They can seek redress from their local mayor and councils.
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2780, a technical cleanup measure related to Arizona’s judicial tax lien foreclosure and excess proceeds process. The sponsor and a witness said the bill clarifies when a court should order a public sale, standardizes distribution of sale proceeds, and corrects inconsistencies left from prior reforms. No opposition was raised, and the committee approved HB 2780 unanimously on a 9-0 do pass vote. The committee then took up House Bill 4029, which would require the Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee to evaluate the revenue impact of federal tax conformity changes earlier in the process, and would require the Department of Revenue to issue tax forms consistent with statute. An amendment was adopted to have OSPB and JLBC each make the evaluation and to require a governor’s report if the impact is $100 million or more, along with new reporting deadlines for DOR. Supporters argued the bill would force earlier action on conformity and prevent tax forms from diverging from statute; opponents said it added bureaucracy and could delay filing. The committee approved HB 4029 as amended by a 5-4 vote. The committee also heard House Bill 4030 and the related HCR 2052, both aimed at limiting local tax and fee increases. HB 4030 would bar municipalities and counties from adopting, imposing, or collecting increased fees, transaction privilege taxes, and utility rates from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2030. The sponsor said the measure was intended to protect taxpayers from inflation and rising local costs. Cities, counties, and utility representatives opposed the bills, warning they would hinder infrastructure financing, water and wastewater projects, road improvements, and public safety services, and could force general fund subsidies or delayed maintenance. Supporters argued local governments have seen substantial revenue growth and should be restrained from further increases. The committee did not reach a final vote on HB 4030 or HCR 2052 in the portion provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, Senator Hall asked you, what was the purpose of the legislation?
  • I've been on the TDA Council. I'm the current president of Texas Wine Growers.
  • And as you know, when you pass legislation, the details...
  • Charlie Ginn, Vice President of TTLA Legislative Affairs.
  • In all but two of your legislative districts, you have lost child care subsidies.
Bills: HB223
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I'd like to point out that this stemmed out of a Judicial Council recommendation regarding court security
  • Thank you, Louis, and certainly Judge Kosurik for their leadership in passing this legislation and other
  • And yet they courageously came to the legislature time and time again to testify for this legislation
Bills: HB223
DE

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Natural Resources & Energy Committee Meeting Jun 24th, 2026

Natural Resources & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The amendment simply retains advisory council stakeholder engagement.
  • I'm rising to express support for this legislation.
  • And as you, as legislators, they're going to be calling you.
  • And as you, as legislators, they're going to be calling you.
  • We urge this committee to table this legislation. Thank you. Thank you.
Bills: SB287
Summary: The House Natural Resources and Energy Committee met and considered three Senate bills. SB 287 with Senate Amendment 2, a DNREC cleanup bill on recycling, would tighten recycling collection rules for haulers and commercial generators, require multifamily recycling education, repurpose the Delaware Recycling Fund, and add annual reporting; after brief questions and no public comment, the committee motion to release did not initially receive enough votes, so the bill was circulated for signatures. SB 346, which would speed Environmental Appeals Board hearing and decision timelines so DNREC secretary decisions become final if deadlines are missed, drew support from the Nature Conservancy and also failed to get enough votes at the meeting, so it too was circulated for signatures. The committee then took up SB 326, a major utility-regulation bill sponsored by Senator Hanson and Representative Heffernan that would cap certain non-mandatory utility spending, limit interim rates, increase oversight and transparency, and streamline rate-setting. SB 326 generated extensive testimony and debate. Supporters, including the Public Advocate, Sierra Club, PSC staff, and some legislators, argued that Delmarva Power’s spending on non-mandatory infrastructure has risen far faster than inflation, that the company is a regulated monopoly, and that the bill would help restrain future delivery-rate increases without harming reliability because mandatory reliability, storm response, and vegetation management spending would remain allowed. Opponents, including Delmarva Power, business groups, contractors, labor representatives, and the Delaware Contractors Association, argued the cap would delay needed reliability and capacity projects, hurt economic development, reduce jobs, and interfere with utility planning; they also said supply costs, not distribution spending, are the main driver of recent bill increases. After public comment and additional questioning, the committee voted to release SB 326 on a split roll call, but because several members were absent the bill was also walked for additional signatures. The committee then adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 5/6/25

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, this is again done with the four legislative liaison on the council. I serve as one of them.
  • Uh, this is again done with the four legislative liaison on the council. I serve as one of them.
  • Uh, this is again done with the four legislative liaison on the council. I serve as one of them.
  • <00:04:30.080> Really your service on the council. Really your service on the council.
  • deepen understanding among legislators deepen understanding among legislators about<00:52:22.880
Bills: HF3228, HF2441
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:03:03.519> and<00:03:03.640> the<00:03:03.720> positive for this legislation
  • and the positive for this legislation and the positive impact<00:03:04.800> that<00:03:05.040
  • Uh, I mean, for one, we're requiring that this report come back to the legislator.
  • Um when I take a look at the legislator.
  • 49.520> of The Greater Minneapolis Council of The Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches,<00:
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Mar 19th, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • As with any legislation, I have in mind the situation that I'm...
  • Chairman, just to clarify, this is for the city council members to participate in the RSA.
  • This is only for the city council... This is only for the city council members. Okay, optional.
  • If we can, I wanted to know from RSA, are there other city councils that are already involved in RSA,
Bills: SB208, SB216, HB187
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Mar 11th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • legislative classmates, Chairman Reggie Smith.
  • I said, "Look, here's the Texas legislators.
  • I'm here standing against this piece of legislation.
  • Under this legislation as drafted, that is actually not allowed.
  • So that is a reason why we're against this legislation.
Bills: HB 3
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services Mar 11th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • testimony, uh, she said that the benefits follow the child according for this, for this proposed legislation
  • states who are looking at this and if we wait because we come in for 2 years, there'll be other legislators
  • needs if he lived here in Texas, but and it would keep the child in a kinship places which we as a legislator
  • I'll be honest, I am actually probably more aware of the legislative stuff in CPS world than most, and
  • From my understanding, us passing this legislation is going to allow us to be able to, like, uh, Representative
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Larsen, I'm director of the Legislative Larsen, I'm director of the Legislative Budget<00:53:48.880
  • > Budget Uh, perhaps the Legislative Budget Uh, perhaps the Legislative Budget Office<00:56:13.040
  • Um, both for agencies and Legislative Um, both for agencies and Legislative Budget<00:57:08.440>
  • I'm just wondering legislation.
  • requirement both for the Legislative requirement both for the Legislative Budget<01:12:06.640>
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 14th, 2026 at 04:37 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Natalie Faustle with Accel in Action, and we are here to say that we want you to support this great legislation
  • We are here to say that we want you to support this great legislation.
  • We were proud supporters of the legislation last year and are very excited to see the improved language
  • We could or will define some of these things further in rule after the legislation is passed.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 13th, 2026 at 04:06 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • This legislation is one that we, of course, support.
  • There was very little need for that legislation.
  • This legislation is taking a proactive step to prevent that intimidation.
  • This legislation is not targeting intimidation threats or criminal conduct.
  • County clerks, are they in support of your legislation? Do you know? Mr.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • During the period beginning of the date of the special legislative session convenes and continue through
  • the date of final adjournment of the special legislative session.
  • The uh and these special sessions have repeatedly turned into many legislative sessions.
  • Very little public awareness of this kind of legislation.
  • The judicial branch really is a is a is not involved in our actions here to make legislation.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26 - Part 2

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • AGC, Associated General Contractors, initiated the stakeholders discussions that have led to this legislation
  • Uh our legislation forward. uh Edvite.
  • Uh, this legislation simply ensures that all facility operators participate in the same system and that
  • So when this legislation is passed, Metro Transit will be joining its peers in a best practice.
  • is<00:13:25.040> passed, So when this legislation is passed, So when this legislation
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26 - Part 1

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We appreciate your interest and participation in the legislative process.
  • . um whether you're here for legislators. um whether you're here for 10<00:09:50.720> days<00:
  • So, um, it's set up a situation where, uh, I think legislators don't feel safe in many cases.
  • And so I want to make sure that we're making that commitment to the next legislators that are coming
  • <00:23:38.000> and deals with the safety of legislators and deals with the safety of legislators
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • and that is beware ye all legislators and that is beware ye all legislators who<00:22:59.679>
  • :23:02.000> to who dare bring pension legislation to who dare bring pension legislation to this
  • Taylor, legislative affairs Jeff Taylor, legislative affairs director<00:25:26.480> for<00:25:
  • legislation legislation and<01:03:28.240> the<01:03:28.720> u<01:03:28.880> the
  • legislation, 20 years, I'd be eligible. legislation, 20 years, I'd be eligible.
Summary: The Public Pension Oversight Board met on February 13 and approved the minutes after establishing a quorum. The committee then took up three pension-related bills, beginning with Rep. Callaway’s proposal to allow certain retired police officers with 15 to 19 years of service to be rehired by local law enforcement agencies. Callaway and Brandon Lincoln of the FOP said the bill is intended to help recruitment and retention, especially for departments facing staffing shortages, and emphasized that it would be optional and would not allow double-dipping. Committee members raised concerns that lowering the service threshold from 20 to 15 years could create an unfunded liability and weaken the pension system, and several members said they did not yet fully understand how the pension and insurance provisions would work. The sponsor said she was open to working on the bill, and the chair noted the committee would continue to examine it with help from KPA staff. The second bill, presented by Rep. Lewis with Brandon Lincoln and Jeff Taylor, addressed probationary employees in CS agencies, including firefighters and police officers. The bill would let certain former probationary employees purchase service credit for time spent in probation, and would extend line-of-duty death and disability protections to employees who are injured or killed during probationary service. Testimony said the measure is optional for employers, could be used as a recruitment tool, and would allow employees within six months of the probationary period to buy back the time themselves if they choose. Members generally supported the concept, noted a negligible fiscal note, and discussed whether current employees could buy back older probationary periods; the sponsor said the bill did not appear to allow that, though he was open to further discussion. Throughout both bills, members focused on whether the proposals would create new pension costs or liabilities and how they would interact with existing retirement tiers and contribution rules. Several members asked for clarification on whether rehired workers would contribute to the pension system, whether employers would pay normal cost or any contribution at all, and whether the bills would affect future retirement benefits. The sponsors and witnesses repeatedly said the measures were limited, optional, and intended to address staffing and fairness issues without changing the core retirement system, but the committee did not take final action on the bills during the discussion.