Video & Transcript Research : 'liability shield'
Page 139 of 298
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Ways and Means (01/21/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- of what their ultimate liability will be.
- So businesses can now only keep on account up to 500% of their liability.
- If their liability was $100, they can't keep on account more than $500.
- If their liability was $100, they can't keep on account more than $500.
- That would be 500% of your prior year's liability. Correct. Yep.
Summary:
The committee received an overview from Chris of the Legislative Budget Assistance Office on how it will estimate unrestricted revenues for the General Fund, Education Trust Fund, Highway Fund, and Fish and Game Fund. He explained that the committee’s work is based on current law, not pending bills, and that the estimates will feed into a House resolution and an amendment to House Bill 1, the operating budget. He also described the broader budget process, including how House and Senate estimates are reconciled, how surplus statements account for revenue changes from enacted bills, and how a committee of conference could resolve differences later in the session. No votes were taken.
Members then asked about why the Education Trust Fund was running below plan. Chris said the shortfall appeared to be driven largely by business taxes, including differences in the BET/BPT split and improved tax-processing systems that better track where business tax payments belong. Representative Orr also asked about tobacco tax collections and out-of-state sales; Chris said tobacco revenue was likely overestimated in 2023 based on COVID-era patterns, with more people smoking at home, and noted that e-cigarette tax revenue goes to the General Fund while cigarette taxes are split between the General Fund and Education Trust Fund. He said he did not have a specific estimate for cross-border sales.
Commissioner Lindsay St. Pierre of the Department of Revenue then began a deeper dive into the department’s role and the taxes it administers. She reviewed the department’s mission, organizational structure, taxpayer services, and the tax policy and legislative analysis staff who prepare fiscal notes and testify on bills. She noted that the department administers about $2.9 billion in revenue across major taxes such as business taxes, meals and rooms, and utility property tax, and that the figures being discussed were preliminary because the annual report had not yet been issued. The discussion was informational only, with no formal action taken.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (04/08/2026)
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- And if you understand what I'm laying out for you, it's that there's this shielding and a cover-up of
- And if you understand what I'm laying out for you, it's that there's this shielding and a cover-up of
- 58.800>
this is that there's this that there's this is that there's this that there's this shielding - 13:59.840>
cover <03:14:00.080>up <03:14:00.319>of <03:14:00.560>this shielding - and a cover up of this shielding and a cover up of this investigation. investigation. investigation.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, December 16, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- also convicted of accepting bribes from violent drug cartel members to fuel his political career, shielding
- Throughout history, Democratic and Republican presidents have used clemency to reward allies and shield
- cartel members to fuel his political cartel members to fuel his political career,<00:07:29.440>
shielding - /c><00:07:29.840>
them <00:07:30.000>from <00:07:30.319>prosecution career, shielding - them from prosecution career, shielding them from prosecution in<00:07:31.039>
exchange <00:07
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- have a functioning fire protection sprinkler system, and if the owner or operator does not carry liability
- have a functioning fire protection sprinkler system, and if the owner or operator does not carry liability
- have a functioning fire protection sprinkler system, and if the owner or operator does not carry liability
- have a functioning fire protection sprinkler system, and if the owner or operator does not carry liability
- have a functioning fire protection sprinkler system, and if the owner or operator does not carry liability
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- recreational liability for recreational activities<00:20:55.880>
on <00:20:56.080>private< - I guess a lot of landowners are concerned about liability.
- They don't want them there because of the liability concerns, and I feel this would kind of ease their
- And again, landowners don't want to open up their lands for those things because of liability concerns
- those things because of liability those things because of liability concerns<00:23:36.240>
so
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on several bills. HB 114, concerning employment in the State Historic Preservation Program, drew support from DLNR, which said the measure would help retain qualified archaeologists, architects, and other professionals by preserving current pay levels for a limited number of positions. Members raised concerns about expanding exempt positions and the effect on union coverage, and DLNR said it was also working with DEHRD on longer-term reclassification issues. No vote was taken on the bill in the portion provided.
HB 12, relating to tort liability, drew strong opposition from the Hawaii Association for Justice, which argued the bill would create overly broad immunity for landowners, conflict with Hawaii’s comparative fault framework, and undermine existing recreational liability law. Supporters said it would reduce liability concerns and encourage landowners to allow hiking, hunting, search-and-rescue training, and firearms-related uses on private land. The committee then moved on without any recorded vote in the excerpt.
The committee also discussed HB 29 on counties, but no county representative was present, and members questioned whether the proposal should instead proceed through condemnation if it involved a forced sale. HB 175 on property maintenance received DLNR comments that the bill should be narrowed to noxious weeds and that fire-related provisions were more properly handled by county fire departments and the State Fire Marshal. HB 331 on permits drew support from several state agencies, but the Honolulu Board of Water Supply opposed it unless “repetitive construction” was defined more clearly; members and agencies discussed narrowing the bill to avoid unintended impacts on water and utility infrastructure. The committee also heard strong support for HB 3 on North Shore beach management, HB 309 on fish ponds, and HB 306 on water code penalties, though the Board of Water Supply raised concerns about increased fines and suggested an alternative governor’s bill and clearer administrative rules.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- I would uh want to direct to just generally uh these facilities carry a substantial amount of liability
- Um so I don't know that that creates any new liabilities that don't already exist.
- Senator Utky's comments about liability. Senator Utky's comments about liability.
- carry a substantial amount of liability carry a substantial amount of liability insurance<01:38:
- any new liabilities that don't already<01:38:31.119>
exist.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/25
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- the calculated risk: Do I have any contraband in my vehicle which could lead to further criminal liability
- seen as a result of this, we have seen increased deaths, increased injuries, and also increased liability
- the calculated risk: Do I have any contraband in my vehicle which could lead to further criminal liability
- the calculated risk: Do I have any contraband in my vehicle which could lead to further criminal liability
- the calculated risk: Do I have any contraband in my vehicle which could lead to further criminal liability
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:31:49.919>
or of their property tax um liabilities or of their property tax um liabilities - or sorry<00:31:50.320>
their <00:31:50.480>tax <00:31:50.720>liabilities <00:31: - 51.559>
so <00:31:51.840>it <00:31:51.960>hurts sorry their tax liabilities so it - hurts sorry their tax liabilities so it hurts seniors<00:31:52.760>
too <00:31:53.080>in - it be if I what would my tax liability it be if I what would my tax liability federal<01:04:47.640
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee Apr 21st, 2026
Energy, Utilities and Communications
Transcript Highlights:
- subject to a 24% tax under the income tax component of contributions and advances to cover the tax liabilities
- owed by the utility to federal and state... ...to cover the tax liabilities owed by the utility to federal
- We think SB 1327 weaves consumer protection, liability, and climate goals together in a comprehensive
- We think SB 1327 weaves consumer protection, liability, and climate goals together in a comprehensive
- under inverse condemnation and strict liability.
Summary:
The committee heard SB 919, SB 931, SB 1215, SB 1359, SB 1125, and SB 1098, with authors and witnesses presenting each measure and the committee taking up amendments on several bills. SB 919 would extend the biomethane monetary incentive program through 2030 and encourage CPUC action on reducing renewable natural gas interconnection costs; supporters said it would help methane reduction and RNG development, while opponents warned about ratepayer costs and the use of public funds. The author said the amended bill removed the rate-basing direction and instead urged CPUC action. SB 931 would extend Diablo Canyon’s Community Impact Mitigation Program through 2030; supporters said local communities and schools rely on the funding, while opponents argued it would add about $47 million in statewide ratepayer costs and should instead be paid from existing PG&E revenues. Committee discussion focused on whether the bill was tied to a broader Diablo Canyon extension package, and the author said it was intended to cover the five-year extension period already enacted.
The committee also heard SB 1215, which would direct the CPUC to set deployment targets for EV charging in multifamily housing. The author and supporters said renters are largely shut out of home charging and that existing utility pilots have been successful but insufficient; the bill’s amendments would require consideration of ratepayer benefits, non-ratepayer funding, and system constraints. SB 1359 would require utilities to more carefully justify new gas infrastructure investments and consider electrification and non-pipeline alternatives first; supporters framed it as a guardrail against stranded gas assets, while gas utilities and other opponents said it could undermine safety, the obligation to serve, and ongoing CPUC proceedings. SB 1125 would establish a statewide low-income water rate assistance program upon appropriation; supporters emphasized widespread household water debt and the lack of statewide aid, while one member raised concerns about the lack of a funding source and the limits of Proposition 218. The bill was moved and the roll was opened, with several ayes and at least one no recorded.
Finally, SB 1098 would restrict the use of utility memorandum and balancing accounts by requiring exceptional circumstances, more commission review, cost-sharing or lower returns, and sunset dates. Supporters said these accounts have proliferated and allow utilities to recover costs after the fact with too little oversight, while utilities and business groups argued the accounts are needed for hard-to-forecast costs such as wildfire mitigation and emergencies, and that the CPUC already reviews them. The committee also heard brief introductory remarks on SB 1295, which would promote more targeted use of distributed batteries on the distribution grid to save money and improve reliability, with utilities and environmental groups expressing support and saying they would continue working on the details.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee Apr 20th, 2026
Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- detailed safety assessments for each companion chatbot could create operational, competitive, and liability
- private right of action in 1414.8A, which we think exposes businesses and others to significant liability
- My concerns with the bill deal with, frankly, sort of the performance and liability construct that’s
- “This bill to define conduct for which there’s substantial liability.
- The new definition that exposes liability, the inability, the non-requirement that a potential plaintiff
Summary:
The committee heard several bills focused on AI, privacy, and surveillance. SB 903 would bar AI from independently providing therapy or psychotherapy services, require licensed human oversight, and impose disclosure, consent, confidentiality, and privacy protections. Supporters, including a bereaved parent and behavioral health groups, argued that chatbot “therapy” can be dangerous and that only licensed professionals can safely handle crisis situations. Opponents, including TechNet, the California Medical Association, and the California Hospital Association, said the bill could restrict beneficial clinical tools and create conflicts in triage, screening, and data use. The bill passed 4-0 to Appropriations and was placed on call. SB 1119 would create a broader framework for child safety in chatbot use, including risk assessments, crisis protocols, parental controls, time limits, limits on data use, incident reporting, audits, and a private right of action. Supporters said children are especially vulnerable to sycophantic companion chatbots and cited the death of Adam Raine; opponents raised concerns about vague standards, overlap with SB 243, prescriptive design mandates, and litigation risk. The bill passed 4-0 to Judiciary and was placed on call.
The committee also considered SB 1013, which would require annual DOJ audits of automated license plate reader use, training for users, and a 30-day retention limit for ALPR data, with limits on hot lists and query access. Supporters said most data belongs to innocent drivers, existing safeguards have been widely violated, and shorter retention would protect privacy without eliminating investigative value. Law enforcement groups opposed the bill, arguing the 30-day limit would hinder solving older crimes, locating missing persons, and recovering stolen vehicles. The bill passed 4-1 to Appropriations and was placed on call. SB 1292 would authorize certain cities to use stationary cameras or sensors to enforce curb and loading-zone rules, particularly around delivery zones, bike lanes, and no-stopping areas. Supporters framed it as a local-control and safety measure for modern curb management, while privacy advocates warned against expanding automated enforcement through pilot programs. The bill passed 4-1 to Appropriations and was placed on call.
The committee then heard SB 1101, which would require California higher education institutions to notify students, faculty, and staff when their personal information is shared with federal agencies and to limit disclosures to what is legally required. Supporters from the University of California Student Association, faculty groups, labor organizations, and privacy advocates said the bill would improve transparency and protect against politically motivated federal investigations. There was no opposition testimony, and the bill passed 5-0 to Appropriations and was placed on call. Finally, SB 951, the California Worker Technological Displacement Act, was introduced as a labor measure responding to AI-related layoffs and reduced hiring. It would require advance notice of technological displacement, reporting to workers and the state, and priority for displaced workers in some cases. Supporters said the state needs data and notice to respond to AI-driven job losses; the transcript ended during the bill’s presentation before testimony or a vote.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Judiciary Committee Mar 25th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- It doesn't create any new theories of liability, and it doesn't create any new defenses.
- As the committee analysis correctly observes, nothing in AB 316 addresses whether strict liability should
- The plaintiff still has the exact same burden of proof, whether it's strict liability or negligence,
- A number of factors impact liability insurance premiums, including the time it takes to resolve these
- Liability insurers are already facing pretty significant cost pressures to continue offering coverage
Summary:
The committee heard several bills, with the most detailed discussion focused on AB 316, AB 251, AB 474, AB 1201, AB 464, and AB 614. AB 316 would prevent AI developers or deployers from arguing in civil cases that an AI system’s alleged autonomy absolves them of responsibility. Supporters framed it as a narrow guardrail to protect families, especially children, from harms like dangerous chatbots and deepfakes; opponents, including TechNet and the Chamber of Progress, raised concerns about possible strict-liability implications. The bill was moved out of committee to Privacy and Consumer Protection.
AB 251 would let judges lower the burden of proof in elder abuse cases when a skilled nursing facility or RCFE intentionally destroys evidence. Supporters said the measure is needed because elder abuse victims are often unable to testify and records are vulnerable to spoliation, while opponents argued existing sanctions are sufficient and warned of more litigation. The bill passed, with committee members emphasizing the vulnerability of elder abuse victims. AB 474 sought to expand nonprofit home-sharing programs, including tax incentives for low-income homeowners and changes to housing law and lodger rules. Supporters said it would help older adults and low-income Californians avoid homelessness, but several members and the California Apartment Association raised concerns about removing lodger-law protections for homeowners; the author committed to keep working on the issue. The bill passed to Human Services.
AB 1201 would give courts discretion to provide family reunification services to parents with certain violent felony convictions, rather than applying an automatic bypass. Supporters from Starting Over Inc. described personal experiences with permanent family separation and argued the bill would give parents a fair chance when the conviction is unrelated to child safety. Some members supported the measure but questioned whether domestic violence histories should be treated differently; the author said the bill still allows courts to deny services when reunification would endanger a child. The bill passed to Human Services. AB 464 addressed sexual abuse and retaliation in state prisons by extending reporting time after release, adding 90-day monitoring after reports, barring rehiring of confirmed abusers, and strengthening reporting and anti-retaliation rules. Survivors testified about abuse, retaliation, and failures in CDCR’s response; the bill passed to Appropriations.
AB 614 would standardize the Government Claims Act filing deadline at one year for all claims. The author and supporters argued the current six-month deadline for injury and wrongful death claims is too short for victims to learn the process, find counsel, and gather evidence, while businesses often get a full year. A civil rights attorney and a family member of a deceased jail detainee testified in support, describing how the current deadline can block meritorious claims. The bill was presented for committee consideration as the hearing continued.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
WTL-HWN DEFER, WTL-PSM, WTL Public Hearings 02-03-2025
Transcript Highlights:
- There would be some liability issues that need to be addressed, perhaps an expansion of chapter 185,
- There would be some liability issues that need to be addressed, perhaps an expansion of chapter 185,
- be some liability issues that need<00:41:09.000>
to <00:41:09.119>be <00:41:09.319> - <00:41:26.119>
and <00:41:26.240>the regards of the the liability and the regards of - the the liability and the responsibility<00:41:27.119>
of <00:41:27.400>performing <00:
Summary:
The committee first took up SB 534, a measure concerning development in Kakaʻako Makai involving the Hawaii Community Development Authority and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. The chairs explained that the hearing was decision-making only and no testimony would be accepted, though members could ask clarifying questions. The chair outlined amendments to clarify HCDA’s approval process, require an environmental impact statement before residential development proposals are submitted, require Department of Health documentation on hazardous substances, and specify that only OHA-owned parcels would be eligible for certain residential development with a 400-foot height limit and maximum floor area ratio of 10.0. The amendments also addressed affordability, owner-occupancy, association fees, and a special fund, while noting Attorney General concerns that the fee could be construed as a tax and suggesting further review by Judiciary and Ways and Means.
Members discussed the affordability threshold, with one senator suggesting 160% AMI instead of 140% due to high housing costs and concern that essential workers could be priced out. Others raised concerns about Native Hawaiian affordability, the long-term effect of perpetuity restrictions, and whether the process would protect OHA’s interests. An HCDA representative said 140% AMI was used in existing reserve housing rules and that lower thresholds could make development economically infeasible. OHA and other supporters said the proposal was still early in planning and emphasized the need for public hearings, community input, and compliance with environmental and remediation standards. The committees voted to pass SB 534 with amendments: Water and Land approved it 4-1, and Hawaiian Affairs also adopted the chair’s recommendation, with one member excused and one voting no.
The meeting then moved to SB 3, relating to water resource management. The bill would authorize the Commission on Water Resource Management to retain independent legal counsel, create an executive director position, allow challenges to emergency orders under certain conditions, establish fines for water use offenses, and revise emergency and shortage declaration procedures; Red Hill-related provisions were noted as removed from this version. Testimony was largely supportive, including from DLNR, the Board of Water Supply, OHA, and Sierra Club, with OHA stressing the measure’s importance to Native Hawaiian water rights and past litigation. A Department of Hawaiian Home Lands representative supported the bill with amendments and recommended explicit language directing the commission chair or designee to advocate for water rights and reservations for homelands. The chair indicated the committees would use the prior Senate-passed version as the basis for further action, and the discussion then moved on to SB 130, a search-and-rescue reimbursement bill.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Hearing Senate Emergency Management Committee and Natural Resources and Water Committee May 13th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- mitigation funding has been spent by utilities on minimizing their risk, given their very unique liability
- it, 12% of the fires actually involved utility-type infrastructure, and because of their strict liability
- clauses, that's where their liability is happening.
- But you have to have something around it, and you have to have, you know, because the liability of letting
- on the record as well that, again, we need to make those changes first before we can talk about liability
Summary:
The joint Senate hearing of the Natural Resources and Water Committee and the Emergency Management Committee focused on wildfire resilience, with members discussing the SB 254 report on enhancing California’s response to natural catastrophes. Opening remarks emphasized the scale of wildfire damage, the need for prevention and preparedness, and concerns about the affordability and insurability crisis. Senators repeatedly contrasted the relatively small share of funding going to community hardening with the much larger amounts spent on utility wildfire mitigation and landscape-scale projects, and several members raised concerns about CEQA delays, one-time funding, and the need for more sustainable, ongoing financing.
The Legislative Analyst’s Office presented an overview showing about $4.7 billion in state wildfire resilience appropriations from 2018-19 through 2025-26, with funding shifting from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to the General Fund and then to Proposition 4. LAO noted that only about $65 million had been specifically targeted to community hardening, while most funding went to forest health, fuels, research, and related programs. LAO also said one-time funding will decline in coming years and that future GGRF support is uncertain, though General Fund use is not legally precluded. Members asked about maintenance costs, polluter-pays ideas, and whether performance metrics should focus more on property and community risk reduction than acres treated.
Cal Fire’s State Fire Marshal described the state’s community wildfire preparedness strategy, centered on home hardening, defensible space, and neighborhood-scale mitigation. He said roughly 4 million homes are in the wildland-urban interface, most built before modern fire-resistant standards, and argued that the state must move from response to prevention. He said Cal Fire is incorporating the SB 254 recommendations into its updated action plan, has streamlined some fuel-reduction projects under a recent executive proclamation, and is shifting some grant funding toward maintenance of existing treatments. Cal OES described the AB 38 pilot and FEMA hazard mitigation work, saying the pilot helped build tools and standards for home hardening but that federal approval delays remain a major barrier; the agency reported 155 hardened properties, 19 under construction, and 370 assessed and waiting. The Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force said it has coordinated more than $6 billion in state and federal investments, is moving toward regional block grants and better data-driven prioritization, and is developing separate community and landscape strategies. The hearing ended with discussion of modeling, data gaps, utility coordination, contractor capacity, and possible legislative or budget changes to better align funding and metrics with community safety outcomes.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Types and amounts of insurance liability coverage that the charter must obtain.
- A provision to indemnify and hold harmless from any suit, claim, or liability arising from a charter
- Um types and amounts of insurance<00:14:48.880>
liability <00:14:49.519>coverage <00:14: - 50.000>
that <00:14:50.240>the insurance liability coverage that the insurance liability - arising from a charter school liability arising from a charter school operation.<00:15:00.800>
Um
Keywords:
anonymous reporting, school safety, education, crisis intervention, threat reporting, early literacy, reading instruction, teacher preparation, teacher candidates, teacher licensure, educator licensing, Professional Educator Licensing and Standards Board, PELSB, field experience, supervised practicum, evidence-based reading, science of reading, literacy methods, teacher training, preservice teachers
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
Senate Standing Committee on Health Service (2-25-26) - Upon Adjournment of the Senate
Transcript Highlights:
- There's never been a liability issue any of our hospitals have faced regarding our systems, including
- How do you cover the liability for this?
- And so we want to provide that opportunity to have those standards for them. >> But legally, liability
- issues<00:51:18.400>
has <00:51:18.640>kind <00:51:18.720>of triage and liability - issues has kind of triage and liability issues has kind of been<00:51:19.040>
discussed.
Summary:
A presenter from Fast Health Corporation described a proposed Kentucky Health Command System tied to Senate Bill 175, which would create a state-sanctioned AI platform for rural hospitals and telehealth. The company said the system would help rural residents get health information remotely, triage minor issues, and escalate more serious cases to Kentucky providers, with use cases including blood pressure, diabetes, maternity care, smoking cessation, and other preventive-care topics. The presenter argued the system would help rural hospitals compete with out-of-state telehealth companies and keep patients connected to local care.
The presentation also emphasized a commercial model the sponsor said would generate new revenue through ads and branded interactions, with the bill reportedly directing 80% of that revenue to rural hospitals and 20% to the state to maintain the system. The presenter said the technology would augment, not replace, doctors and nurses, and claimed it could improve access and convenience in underserved areas. Committee members raised concerns about liability, whether the AI could provide medical advice, and whether there was evidence it had reduced emergency room visits; the presenter said the system could not give medical advice and acknowledged the technology is still very new.
The sponsor of the bill said the goal was to help transform rural health care, reduce unnecessary ER use, and capture revenue that would otherwise go to commercial search engines and out-of-state companies. No vote or final action was taken during the portion of the meeting provided, and the discussion ended with questions about branding, loyalty, and the legal limits of the AI system.
AL
Alabama 2026 Regular Session
Alabama House County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 4th, 2026
County and Municipal Government
Transcript Highlights:
- of the agreed-upon changes to the bill to ensure that counties and cities were protected from any liability
- Those funds that aren't loaned out are invested in different ways, and so the asset liability management
- Those funds that aren't loaned out are invested in different ways, and so the asset liability management
- Those funds that aren't loaned out are invested in different ways, and so the asset liability management
- Those funds that aren't loaned out are invested in different ways, and so the asset liability management
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- I serve on a public school board, so I'm very familiar with how liability comes in, and it happens all
- First of all, there's no liability that goes to the districts. Nothing.
- First of all, there's no liability that goes to the districts. Nothing.
- First of all, there's no liability that goes to the districts. Nothing.
- Furthermore, I mentioned that this will expose districts to litigation and attorney fee liability.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Judiciary Committee May 6th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- window, they're given a 120-day right to correct a violation identified in a construction-related liability
- under state and... ...liability under state and federal law if they, for example, let their property
- Liability. Follow-up, if I can.
- Because if it were already fixed, then there would be no liability.
- To address concerns regarding legal liability, I've taken amendments to remove language that required
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on several bills. AB 416 would allow emergency room physicians to initiate 5150 mental health holds, with supporters saying it would reduce emergency room bottlenecks and speed care for patients in crisis. County and behavioral health representatives opposed the bill, and some members raised broader concerns about the 5150 system and juvenile placements. The bill was ultimately approved on a do-pass as amended vote.
AB 446, the Surveillance Pricing Act, drew extensive testimony. The author and supporters argued it would prohibit businesses from using personal data to charge different prices for the same product or service, describing the practice as discriminatory and exploitative. Business and industry groups opposed the bill, warning that its language was too broad, could affect discounts and loyalty programs, and would create litigation risk through a private right of action. After discussion about enforcement and possible amendments, the bill passed on a do-pass motion.
AB 632 would give local governments a faster way to collect penalties for serious code violations, including unsafe housing, fire hazards, and illegal cannabis activity, by allowing certain fines to become money judgments and clarifying lien authority. It had support from county and city groups and no opposition was voiced in the hearing; the bill passed as amended. ACA 7, a constitutional amendment intended to clarify and limit misuse of Section 31A, also moved forward after brief support testimony. The committee then took up AB 649, which would extend protections for businesses that proactively obtain certified access specialist inspections and fix accessibility violations; the author, a small business owner, and others testified in support, while disability rights groups moved to neutral after amendments. Members discussed the balance between access enforcement and reducing predatory litigation, and the bill was still under consideration as the transcript ended.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh they'll review risk mitigation, liability, enforcement and oversight, possibilities of reinsurance
- There's a portion talking about liability laws, which we certainly have added some.
- There's a portion talking<00:05:14.160>
about <00:05:14.400>liability <00:05:15.039> - laws,<00:05:16.000>
uh, <00:05:16.160>which talking about liability laws, uh, which - talking about liability laws, uh, which we<00:05:17.039>
certainly <00:05:17.440>have <
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Nov 6th, 2025
Legislative Health & Human Services Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- One of the concerns is always about liability.
- Regarding liability, malpractice insurance would be required, and rates for dental hygienists are very
- And again, they would be required to carry malpractice insurance to cover any liability issues.
- So we have addressed that in our model, along with the liability issue.
- We do not do foster care for liability issues. I understand. Thank you, Madam Chair.