Transcript Highlights:

• It's a multi-agency function, and actually our employees are part of the judicial branch, but the judicial
• employees are part of the judicial employees are part of the judicial branch<00:09:38.640> but
• <00:20:45.919> branch gets reimbursed from the judicial branch gets reimbursed from the judicial
• <00:21:01.039> branch approves it and then the judicial branch approves it and then the judicial
• Um, that's as I said, the judicial branch pays for operation costs.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The process we use is what termed quasi-judicial in nature.
• As I indicated, the quasi-judicial proceeding that we conduct has a maximum 365 days to make a...
• So, a little bit about our process: quasi-judicial contested case.
• This is a judicial process, and it rules on evidence.
• You think a declaratory order will be a better vehicle or faster, or not be quasi-judicial.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• comprehensive assessment for treatment is being conducted within 30 days of the placement and the judicial
• comprehensive assessment for treatment is being conducted within 30 days of the placement and the judicial
• comprehensive assessment for treatment is being conducted within 30 days of the placement and the judicial
• had trainings to prepare lawyers for SB 463 taking effect, and we've invited CASA, DCYF, and the judicial
• <00:43:06.720> branch<00:43:07.040> to CASA, DCYF, uh the judicial branch to CASA,

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• arriving at the scene with a warrant to conduct their investigation, and were denied access even with a judicial
• arriving at the scene with a warrant to conduct their investigation, and were denied access even with a judicial
• arriving at the scene with a warrant to conduct their investigation, and were denied access even with a judicial
• arriving at the scene with a warrant to conduct their investigation, and were denied access even with a judicial
• arriving at the scene with a warrant to conduct their investigation, and were denied access even with a judicial

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• that the funding was approved through or overseen by an external source, the judge, the courts, the judicial
• As shown on the screen, using the 15th Judicial District as an example, each judicial district's report
• In addition, matters referred are detailed individually by the counties in the judicial district, the
• Presented in Exhibit 3 on pages 6 and 7 of the report is a summary organized by judicial district, as
• Of the report is a summary organized by judicial district.

Summary: The committee first adopted prior minutes and then heard several standing committee audit reports. The executive committee report noted audit and special reports scheduled for the month, one outstanding committee-requested report, and a request to gather information on a possible special report for February. The city/county/local report covered delinquent private water and sewer audits, including reinstatement of turn-back funds for 17 entities, 59 of 64 delinquent 2023 entities filing reports, and action on the town of Daisy requiring repayment of misused street funds. The education report filed three higher education audit reports and deferred one Northwest Arkansas Community College report. The state agencies report filed four reports and deferred audits of the Department of Human Services and the Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism for more information on corrective actions. The committee then received a special audit review of the Charles W. Donaldson Scholars Academy at UA Little Rock. Auditors said the program received $10 million in desegregation funding and a $50,000 grant, awarded $1.87 million in scholarships to 379 students, and saw 116 students graduate. The review found many scholarship eligibility exceptions, including awards above the maximum and to students who did not meet GPA, enrollment-hour, or full-time requirements, and numerous disbursement documentation and authorization problems. Committee members sharply questioned the program’s oversight, the role of former staff, the use of funds for travel and cultural activities, and whether any improper spending should be referred for criminal review. UALR representatives said the program was overseen as a sponsored program, that some controls were later strengthened, and that Philander Smith only verified enrollment rather than eligibility. The committee voted to table the report until the next meeting and asked staff to gather the federal court order and additional information. Finally, the committee reviewed the annual report on matters referred to prosecutors and the Attorney General for 2024. Staff said 164 matters were referred, with 28 criminal charges filed, 39 still under review, 3 dismissed, 5 pending in court, and 96 not charged; convictions in 20 cases led to fines, restitution, audit costs, and some bond trust fund payments. Prosecutor representatives explained that many referrals do not become criminal cases because of intent, timing, or other legal limits, and said they generally seek restitution even when charges are not filed. Members asked for more standardized reporting, including whether restitution was recovered and why cases were not prosecuted, and discussed possible training and a checklist for future reports. The committee then voted to file the report and adjourned, with the next meeting set for February 12-13.

Transcript Highlights:

• And, like, what assurance do you have that our code will be more judicious and thoughtful?
• Do you have that our code will be more judicious and thoughtful? Mr.
• But how about expanding that to the legislative body as well as the judicial body?
• Why aren't we including the judicial and legislative branches in that?
• well as the people, probably, why specifically you did not include the legislative branch and the judicial

Summary: The committee heard and approved several measures. HB 735 expanded Florida’s boating improvement program to fund parking for boat trailers at public ramps and offered a 10% sovereign submerged land lease discount for manufacturers using environmental best management practices; it passed unanimously. HB 4021 expanded the North River Ranch Improvement Stewardship District in Manatee County by 640 acres and was reported favorably. CS for HB 371, which promotes nature-based methods and green/gray infrastructure for coastal resilience, also passed unanimously after supportive testimony from resilience and environmental groups and committee members. The committee then took up HJR 1325, a proposed constitutional amendment to create an elected Commissioner of Government Efficiency (COGE) with authority to audit, investigate, and report on waste, fraud, and abuse in state and local government. The proposal would eliminate the lieutenant governor position, the Government Efficiency Task Force, and the legislature’s current auditor appointment, with many implementation details deferred to a future bill. Members debated the scope of the new office, its relationship to the Auditor General and inspectors general, whether it should cover the legislative and judicial branches, staffing, and the comparison to federal DOGE efforts. An amendment making a minor wording change was adopted, and the resolution passed 23-? with a favorable report after a split vote. The committee also approved two Gulf of America bills. HB 575 redesignated the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America, and CS for HB 549 required Florida’s academic standards and newly adopted instructional materials to reflect the federal designation for materials acquired on or after July 1, 2025. Both measures drew criticism from members who argued the renaming was politically motivated, historically insensitive, and potentially confusing for students, while supporters said Florida should align with federal action. HB 575 passed and CS for HB 549 passed 18-7. Finally, HB 4071, a local bill adjusting the boundary between Coral Springs and Parkland in Broward County by about 8.7 acres, was amended and reported favorably with support from both cities and the Broward delegation.

Transcript Highlights:

• I didn’t put it in slides, but we also created a staff position called a judicial support specialist
• support specialist with a with judicial support specialist with a with a<00:31:35.679> training
• training judicial support specialists training judicial support specialists and<00:32:45.039>
• In addition to that, what we have done at the AOC side with that judicial support specialist position
• done at the AOC side with that judicial done at the AOC side with that judicial support<00:40:21.599

Keywords: Call to Order 00:17 Department of Corrections 01:35 Community Transitional Services 06:47 Administrative Office of the Courts 23:06 Department of Criminal Justice Training/ KSP 45:49 Adjournment 59:14, 958, all

Summary: The Public Safety and Judiciary Committee met without a quorum, so approval of the January 3, January 20, and February 3 minutes was postponed. The committee then heard an update from the Department of Corrections on halfway house and Recovery Kentucky funding and operations. Deputy Commissioner Hillary Daily said DOC contracts for up to 1,752 halfway house beds and 780 Recovery Kentucky beds, with 16 halfway houses and 13 Recovery Kentucky centers statewide. She reported 6,329 admissions in fiscal year 2025, average daily populations of 1,041 in halfway houses and 494 in Recovery Kentucky, and explained that Recovery Kentucky placements are more restrictive, generally excluding violent and sex offenders, while halfway houses serve probationers, parolees, and sex offenders who need treatment. She also described programming such as MRT, parenting, adult basic education, and trauma-focused services, and said some facilities offer supervised visitation. Daily said no new funding request was included in the current budget, though DOC has sought rate increases in prior cycles. Community Transitional Services director Barbara Stum also testified in support of halfway houses as re-entry and substance abuse treatment centers. She said CTS primarily serves men coming out of prison or returning to prison who need treatment, and that halfway houses provide security, accountability, treatment, employment support, and help with home placement. Stum said the state moved substance abuse treatment into the community in 2010 to avoid sending people back to prison for treatment, and argued halfway houses are the least expensive form of incarceration. She cited daily rates of $33.61 for CTS beds and DOC figures of $37.33 to $44.33 per day, compared with higher prison and jail costs, and said reimbursement has not kept pace with inflation since the last increase in 2019. She said staffing and supplies are the main pressure points, with counselor pay below market rates, and noted two counselor vacancies. A former resident, Michael Bird, testified that CTS helped him recover and re-enter the community successfully. The committee also received an update from the Administrative Office of the Courts on implementation of the video arraignment/video conferencing system. AOC officials Zach Ramsey and Charles Buyers said the system is now fully implemented in all courtrooms and is used for video arraignments and other Zoom-based court proceedings. Buyers described the pandemic-era transition from older, inconsistent equipment to improvised laptop/webcam setups, then to a more integrated vendor-supported system with touchscreen controls and a judicial support specialist position for training and operation. He said 324 courtrooms are already up to the current standard, with 128 remaining on an older bundle, and that there are no technical barriers to continued use. AOC said it is seeking $3.8 million in recurring annual funding to keep the systems upgraded and current, and plans to upgrade 46 systems in fiscal year 2026 across 15 counties.

Transcript Highlights:

• , effort to revise our own internal decorum policies for operation of both our courtrooms at the Judicial
• , effort to revise our own internal decorum policies for operation of both our courtrooms at the Judicial
• Um, and I would ask what safety drills look like for the judicial branch. Oh yes.
• Um and to be more specific uh about who we are uh talking about uh here with regards to um the judicial
• here with regards to um the judicial here with regards to um the judicial branch<00:37:29.440>

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So at the Second Judicial District Court, specifically at our Juvenile Justice Center, We are hosting
• One of our biggest staples is frequent judicial oversight.
• These young people have already gone through the judicial process, and so they're not incarcerated.
• But from a judicial perspective, my experience in the Second Judicial District is that until the judges
• One last quick question from the folks from the Second Judicial.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chiefs of Police; Scott Kirkpat, Chiefs of Police; and Brad Burghardt, District Attorney in the 7th Judicial
• Attorneys Association, in support, not wishing to speak; Brad Burkett, also district attorney, 7th Judicial
• We also have Brad Burgett, who's the district attorney in the 7th Judicial District; Darren Alamon, the
• And then we have two other cards, Brad Burgett, District Attorney for the 7th Judicial District, in support

Keywords: 974, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Capitol itself, the Centennial Office Building where the House is currently temporarily located, the Judicial
• 01:37.920> the currently um temporarily located, the currently um temporarily located, the judicial
• 38.960> then<00:01:39.119> of<00:01:39.280> course<00:01:39.439> the judicial
• center and then of course the judicial center and then of course the Minnesota<00:01:40.079> Senate

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The interview focused on changes to security at the Minnesota Capitol complex in response to rising political violence and recent attacks on public officials, including the June 14 assassinations of Melissa and Mark Hartman and the attempted assassination of Senator Hoffman and his wife. The senator said those events, along with broader threats against elected officials, created urgency to strengthen protections for members, staff, and visitors. The discussion centered on the Axtell report, a Department of Public Safety security assessment of four priority buildings: the Capitol, Centennial Office Building, Judicial Center, and Minnesota Senate Building. The report included a public executive summary and a confidential detailed analysis. Its top recommendation was weapon screening, which the advisory committee adopted as the highest-impact measure to prevent weapons or other dangerous items from entering the buildings. The senator described visible changes such as screening at entrances, single-entry points, Evolv machines, and X-ray screening for bags, as well as a Senate rule barring guns in the gallery after concerns about member safety. She argued these measures do not significantly reduce access because most state capitols already screen visitors, and said restrictions on firearms in government buildings are consistent with constitutional limits in sensitive places. She also noted that permit holders may still enter with firearms for now, but said she plans to introduce a bill to ban guns on the Capitol complex entirely. Additional recommendations discussed included encrypted staff badges, more consistent access controls across buildings, and behavioral threat assessment training. The senator said some proposals will require legislative action and funding, citing an estimated $41 million request from the Department of Administration, while other measures could be implemented administratively from the non-public security report.

Transcript Highlights:

• Investigators must go through the judicial process, which protects privacy, but it can delay urgent investigations
• They must go through the judicial process, which protects privacy, but it can slow down urgent investigations
• Privacy protections are deliberate; judicial oversight preserves admissibility and preserves the justice
• Judicial oversight preserves admissibility.

Summary: The committee met with Senators Garcia and Simon excused and heard a presentation from FDLE Deputy Commissioner Vaden Pollard on homicide and violent-crime investigations, focusing on access to blood evidence, toxicology, medical records, mental health records, and the legal limits imposed by Florida law, HIPAA, and 42 CFR Part 2. He explained that autopsy evidence collected by medical examiners is generally available to law enforcement, while hospital records and mental health/substance abuse records usually require subpoenas, court orders, or consent, which can delay investigations. He also discussed the difference between DNA testing and toxicology testing, the role of warrants and probable cause for living suspects, and the special rules that apply when a suspect is deceased. Members asked detailed questions about what toxicology panels include, whether medications can be tested for, how medical examiners review prior medical history, and whether FDLE tracks data linking violent crime to mental health issues or follow up with regulators after incidents. Pollard said the agency follows investigative leads where relevant, but regulatory follow-up depends on the circumstances. He also discussed behavioral threat assessment and management, and said risk protection orders have been used effectively to prevent violence and can lead to court-ordered evaluations and services. The committee then shifted to crime lab capacity and turnaround times. Pollard said the average DNA turnaround time was 208 days for some evidence, with anything over 30 days considered backlog, but that sexual assault kits are prioritized and generally handled much faster, with rush cases sometimes completed within 24 hours. Members expressed concern about delays in unsolved violent and sexual assault cases and asked what resources would help reduce backlog; Pollard said additional analysts would improve turnaround times. The meeting concluded with thanks to the presenter and adjournment after Senator Bernard moved to adjourn.

Transcript Highlights:

• Investigators must go through judicial process, which protects privacy, but it can delay urgent investigations
• They must go through the judicial process, which protects privacy, but it can slow down urgent investigations
• Privacy protections are deliberate; judicial oversight preserves admissibility and preserves the process
• Judicial oversight preserves admissibility.

Summary: The committee convened with a quorum present and heard a presentation from FDLE Deputy Commissioner Vaden Pollard on homicide investigations, blood evidence, toxicology, medical records, and mental health records. Pollard explained that autopsy toxicology and medical examiner records are often critical in death investigations, but access to hospital blood tests, medical records, Baker Act records, and substance abuse treatment records is restricted by Florida law, HIPAA, and 42 CFR Part 2, usually requiring subpoenas, court orders, or consent. He also noted that autopsy reports are generally public, while photographs are confidential, and that medical examiners can access relevant prior medical history of decedents. Members questioned Pollard about what toxicology panels include, whether medications can be tested for, and whether medical examiner reviews can help determine if a deceased person had stopped taking prescribed psychiatric medication. Pollard said toxicology can include alcohol, drugs, and specific medications when relevant, but routine access to living suspects’ medical information is limited. He also discussed FDLE’s behavioral threat assessment work and said investigators may follow leads involving mental health treatment or facility releases when relevant to a case, though he could not speak to regulatory follow-up. The committee also discussed risk protection orders, with Pollard saying FDLE has used them effectively and that they can help prevent violence and connect individuals to services. The discussion then shifted to FDLE laboratory turnaround times and public safety impacts. Pollard said the average DNA turnaround time was 208 days for some cases, while sex assault kits are prioritized and generally remain under 90 days, with rush cases sometimes completed within 24 hours. He said backlog is tied to staffing and analyst capacity, and that faster processing is especially important in unsolved violent and sexual assault cases because delays can leave offenders on the street. The committee also noted that increased toxicology demands would affect toxicology staffing and workload, though not DNA processing. No votes were taken, and the meeting adjourned after the presentation and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• , LEASED, RENTED, OCCUPIED, OR MAINTAINED BY STATE AGENCIES, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, AND THE JUDICIAL
• OF SOURCES INCLUDING INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY STATE AGENCIES, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, AND THE JUDICIAL
• LEASES, ARE STATE AGENCIES, WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, STATE UNIVERSITIES, STATE COLLEGES, AND THE JUDICIAL
• SURPLUS FOR STATE AGENCIES WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, STATE UNIVERSITIES, AND STATE COLLEGES, AND THE JUDICIAL

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• upon our resource witnesses, they're may be others, but based on our resource witnesses, OCA is a judicial
• the OLS numbers, is what I'm really saying. really trying to avoid is there with OCA, OCA being a judicial
• the bill need to contemplate giving direction to OCA or is the governor's relationship with the judicial
• We do think it would be helpful if in the bill it said directed the Judicial Council to collect court-level

Bills: SB825

Keywords: illegal immigration, economic impact, environmental impact, financial impact, annual study, Texas, government report, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The fact that the executive branch or the judicial branch can't stop the legislative branch from doing
• 03:10.000> the fact that the executive branch or the fact that the executive branch or the judicial
• 10.519> branch<00:03:10.879> can't<00:03:11.200> stop<00:03:11.720> the judicial
• branch can't stop the judicial branch can't stop the legislative<00:03:12.440> branch<00:03:12.680

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The transcript centers on the Minnesota House organizing itself at the start of session, with House Republicans asserting that 67 members were present, enough to elect a Speaker and begin operating, while 66 Democrats were absent. The speaker and other Republican leaders argued that the House has authority over its own quorum rules, internal rules, and presiding officers, and that the Secretary of State does not have constitutional authority to control House organization or adjourn the chamber. They said the Secretary of State’s adjournment was improper and indicated the dispute would likely be resolved by the Minnesota Supreme Court if challenged. The Speaker said she was honored to serve, emphasized working for Minnesotans, and said committees would begin meeting later in the week. Republicans framed their agenda around public safety, fraud prevention, fiscal restraint, and affordability, and repeatedly called on Democrats to return to the chamber and “get to work.” They also said they were open to continued negotiations, but only if Democrats were reasonable and present. Questions from reporters focused on the legal basis for proceeding after the Secretary of State adjourned the session, the likelihood of court review, and whether Republicans would follow any Supreme Court ruling. The Speaker said they would comply with court decisions but were confident in their position. She also said the House would meet again at noon the next day and that the status of members who did not take the oath in the chamber would be reviewed if they appeared.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um a court order or judicial warrants.
• consent, court order, judicial warrant. consent, court order, judicial warrant.
• <00:56:52.040> for a judicial warrant. Senator Limmer. for a judicial warrant.
• Subdivision seven is a discussion about judicial notice.
• Uh and that's about judicial notice.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's not clear that it's available in a judicial foreclosure.
• have asked Legal Aid whether they can advise clients that they may. use the postponement tool in a judicial
• that Minnesota's right to postpone a sale, either by a mortgagor or a mortgagee, is available in a judicial

Bills: HF1224, HF1615, HF2403

Keywords: foreclosure, mortgage postponement, homeowners, redemption period, Minnesota Statutes, cannabis, hemp, lower-potency, edibles, regulations, licensing, local control, consumer safety, age restrictions, commerce policy, financial institutions, insurance regulation, limited long-term care insurance, Medicare supplement, health insurance

Transcript Highlights:

• respond, just to your point, a great point, Senator King, and I do want to say that I do have a judicial
• reform bill that is tied to the judicial pay raise, by the way.
• So this is not a judicial issue. This is a funding issue by local government.
• Because it undermines due process, the presumption of innocence and judicial discretion, it would keep
• We also ask the bill to define the word pending because the judicial interpretation of pending is the

Bills: SB9, SB1047, SB1048, SJR17, SJR49, SB40, SJR1, SJR5, SB 9, SB 40, SJR 1

Keywords: bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, criminal procedure, public safety report, victim notification, family violence, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunction, taxpayer rights, violent crimes, sexual offenses, community safety, constitutional amendment, trafficking

Transcript Highlights:

• um in response to uh the Judicial um in response to uh the Judicial Department<03:47:15.320>
• We urge is upon request from judicial.
• It maintains the requirement for judicial approval, but 16 or 17 to marry with judicial 16 or 17 to marry
• It does eliminate judicial discretion.
• onto the executive branch, the judicial onto the executive branch, the judicial branch,<04:18:30.960

Keywords: 981, all

Summary: The House convened with a quorum, approved the journal, and heard several announcements and recognitions. Members marked World Ovarian Cancer Day, promoted Cinco de Mayo and a related potluck, welcomed DeMolay International guests, and recognized correctional officers and employees during Corrections Officers and Employees Week. Several committees also announced upcoming meetings and bill hearings, including Health and Human Services, Judiciary, Transportation, Housing, and Local Government, Capital Development, and Appropriations. Committee reports were read, including favorable recommendations on several bills and a postponement indefinitely of House Joint Resolution 1029. The Majority Leader then moved a slate of bills to special orders, and the House agreed without objection. The chamber then proceeded to floor consideration of Senate Bill 134, concerning payment card network fees. Senate Bill 134 drew debate over whether merchants should continue paying swipe fees on the tax portion of credit card transactions. Supporters said the bill would provide meaningful relief to small businesses and restaurants, with estimated savings of $8,000 to $10,000 per business and about $217 million statewide. Opponents argued the bill shifted costs to banks and could have unintended consequences, suggesting the state should instead directly pay or reimburse the fees. After debate, the House passed Senate Bill 134 by voice vote.