Video & Transcript Research : 'constituent elements'

Page 137 of 495
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Transportation - 03/03/25

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • The additional elements of project and staff cooperation include contractor and subcontractor schedule
  • The additional elements of project and staff cooperation include contractor and subcontractor schedule
  • The additional elements of project and staff cooperation include contractor and subcontractor schedule
  • still at the very front end, if you will, so we're just going to hear about some of the initial elements
  • uh around uh uh the initial elements uh around uh uh delivery<00:15:59.000> method<00:15:59.240
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Finance Division III (03/28/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • Was this one of the five elements that you put into the governor's budget?
  • Was this one of the five elements<00:45:18.720> that<00:45:18.960> you<00:45:19.119>
  • put<00:45:19.280> into<00:45:19.599> the elements that you put into the elements that
  • <01:23:07.520> and<01:23:07.760> we on the lives of your constituents and we on the
  • lives of your constituents and we would<01:23:08.159> ask<01:23:08.400> that<01:23:08.639
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The Division 3 work session focused largely on amendment 1176 to HB 2, which would have incorporated the substance of HB 548FN, a House-passed bill creating a direct-pay or membership-based model for health care facilities. Representative Mlan described the proposal as a way to increase competition in health care by extending the direct-care model used in primary care to facilities, arguing it could encourage innovation and that concerns about widespread harm to critical access hospitals were overstated. He pointed to Oklahoma’s long-standing Surgical Center model as evidence that the approach had not spread broadly or displaced hospitals there. Several members and witnesses raised concerns. Representative Stringham questioned whether the model would shift profitable services and patients away from existing hospitals, potentially worsening their finances and affecting Medicaid-related funding. David Ross, speaking for county nursing homes, opposed the language because it also removed moratoriums on nursing home, skilled nursing, inpatient rehabilitation, and self-pay beds, warning that it could increase pressure on Medicaid rates and undermine community-based care. Ben Bradley of the New Hampshire Hospital Association said the proposal appeared to create a separate regulatory framework for direct-pay facilities and raised concerns about patient safety, CMS participation rules, and a separate patient bill of rights. The chair concluded that, because HB 548 was already moving through the Senate, the HB 2 process was not the best vehicle for the policy and that the issue should be left to the Senate’s more deliberative committee process. Representative Ferski moved to not accept or remove amendment 1176 from the agenda, and the committee approved the motion by roll call, 9-0, withdrawing the item from HB 2.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary (02/11/2026)

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Some people do not know all the details and correct spellings of every data element that is required
  • On behalf of our patients, your constituents, we do respectfully urge you to oppose House Bill 1313.
  • Have you considered how these providers, who are my constituents, overwhelmingly will take this as yet
  • ,<05:01:07.360> overwhelmingly<05:01:08.638> will my constituents, overwhelmingly will
  • my constituents, overwhelmingly will take<05:01:08.958> this<05:01:09.280> as<05:01:09.600
Keywords: 1189, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Committee on Housing (02/03/2026)

Housing

Transcript Highlights:
  • Quinn, I think there are some elements of this that we would be completely supportive of, especially
  • There are certainly some elements of that that we do have some concerns around.
  • I think there are elements of Mr.
  • As a refresher to everyone's memories, the specific complaint that I've received from multiple constituents
  • I've received from multiple constituents I've received from multiple constituents uh<04:22:40.800
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The subcommittee first took up House Bill 1598 and an amendment, 2026-0463H. Elliott Barry and Nick Norman testified that the amendment reflected a hard-fought compromise balancing concerns from all sides, and they urged no further changes. With no questions from members, the subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend the bill with the amendment to the full committee, 3-0, and closed the subcommittee. The housing committee then moved through several executive session bills. HB 1010 was amended with 2026-0274H, described as clarifying and implementing prior housing law (HB 631) governing residential units above office and retail space; the amendment was adopted unanimously and the bill was reported ought to pass as amended on a 17-0 vote and placed on consent. HB 65 was then voted ought to pass and also placed on consent, with members saying it was duplicative of the compromise reached on HB 1010. HB 1349 was reconsidered for a clarifying vote and again received unanimous support for its prior disposition, 17-0, and was placed on consent. The committee next took up HB 1523, which concerned homeowners associations. An amendment, 2026-0380H, removed Section 5’s Attorney General enforcement mechanism, added HOA conflict-of-interest approval language, and delayed the effective date to give stakeholders more time; it was adopted unanimously. The bill then passed 18-0 as amended and was put on consent. The committee also voted ITL on CACR 16, a constitutional amendment related to sleeping or homelessness issues, after debate over unintended consequences and whether it protected a basic right; the vote was 10-8, with a majority report assigned and a minority report to be written. Later, HB 108, dealing with inclusionary zoning, was voted ITL 10-8 after members argued the bill imposed unrealistic burdens and could halt development; a minority report was noted with amendment 0149H. HB 7, concerning ADUs and restrictive covenants, was also voted ITL 10-8 after discussion of unintended consequences and a proposed amendment to encourage second ADUs; it was sent to the regular calendar with a minority report and amendment 0289H. HB 1120, on water-related subdivision requirements, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent, with one member noting a study amendment had been offered. HB 1143, addressing housing-provider obligations and municipal enforcement powers, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent. Finally, HB 1145, a fee/tax proposal tied to housing development, was ITL’d 11-7; members debated whether it would discourage development, and a minority report was assigned.
NE
Transcript Highlights:
  • Physical safety is the foundational element of safety in the program, and I want to make sure that our
  • What is going behind building a new building, new construction for these people, from a therapeutic element
  • environment that is still fully secure, similar to what we see at Children's, but has a therapeutic element
Summary: The Health and Human Services Committee held an invited-testimony hearing on LR 425, which examines the Whitehall campus in Lincoln and possible long-term options for youth currently served there. Chair Brian Hardin explained that Whitehall houses two separate programs for adolescent males: a substance use program and a youth-who-sexually-harm program. Testimony from DHHS officials described Whitehall as a Joint Commission-accredited psychiatric residential treatment facility (PRTF) that provides about 40 hours of weekly programming, family involvement, school services, and community reintegration activities. Officials said the department is evaluating whether the programs should remain at Whitehall or move to another state-owned facility, with Hastings described as the department’s preferred alternative because it is more residential in design than a youth rehabilitation treatment center (YRTC).
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:30 am

Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • It helps accomplish these elements. We need a coherent statewide policy.
  • It helps accomplish these elements. We need a coherent statewide policy.
  • Other than the Immigrant Legal Defense Act and Judiciary, elements of these priorities are already present
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The hearing focused on the Safe Communities Act, House 2580 and Senate 1681, along with related proposals to limit local and state cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, prohibit 287(g) agreements, and expand legal defense for immigrants. Most testimony came from advocates, attorneys, labor leaders, health care professionals, educators, and community members who argued that fear of ICE discourages immigrants from reporting crimes, seeking medical care, attending school, or cooperating with courts, and that a clear statewide policy would improve public safety, due process, and trust in institutions. Several speakers described personal or client experiences involving domestic violence, trafficking, workplace abuse, or children affected by deportation, and many emphasized economic harms to workers, families, and small businesses. Health care witnesses said immigration enforcement is causing patients to miss appointments, avoid emergency rooms, and delay preventive care, with resulting public health consequences. Labor and education representatives said immigrant workers and students are increasingly fearful, and that the state should not allow local police to act as ICE agents or enter 287(g) agreements. ACLU and coalition witnesses cited examples they said showed existing or recent collaboration between local agencies and ICE, including courthouse alerts, vehicle stops, and use of municipal spaces, while also arguing that the bill would still allow cooperation on criminal matters and public safety emergencies. One witness opposed the bill, arguing that serious criminal offenders should be deported and defending ICE’s role. Committee members asked several questions about whether the harms described were widespread or anecdotal, and about the distinction between assisting ICE in civil immigration arrests versus responding to violent or public safety emergencies. Witnesses said the bill was aimed at civil immigration enforcement, not criminal investigations or emergency situations. At the end of the hearing, a committee member requested a study on immigration enforcement’s effect on emergency room wait times, and the committee then adjourned without taking a vote on the legislation.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Health May 5th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • So there's 3 key elements of this bill.
  • And the second key element of the bill is that it establishes a notification.
  • And then the third, uh, key element is annual reporting.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health May 5th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • There are three key elements of this bill.
  • The second key element of the bill is that it establishes a notification requirement for these providers
  • The third key element is annual reporting; we just want to know how many people are in these facilities
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 15th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • things like that, um, regulations on what roads they can and can't go on, there's a human safety element
  • Well, there's a human safety element in everything.
  • I mean, when you drive your car, there's an element.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 15th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Regulations on what roads they can and can't go on, there's a human safety element as well.
  • There's a human safety element in everything. I mean, when you drive your car, there's an element.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

April 7, 2025 - 12:30 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • piece of it came about two or three years later because agencies were saying that there were some elements
  • If there's public records... ...some elements of their contracts that were confidential.
  • And so sometimes we get them in... some elements of their contracts that were confidential.
Summary: The subcommittee heard a panel on Florida’s IT procurement process from the Florida Digital Service, the Department of Management Services, and the Department of Financial Services. Witnesses walked through the procurement lifecycle, including planning, market research, solicitation, evaluation, award, implementation, and closeout, and emphasized the role of budget timing, contract managers, and subject matter experts. DMS described the state’s enterprise contracting system, noting more than 1,100 active vendor agreements, over 800 involving IT services, and the statutory requirement to request 25 quotes for certain IT purchases. DFS demonstrated the Florida Accountability Contract Tracking System (FACS), explaining how agencies upload contract and payment data and how the public can search contracts and related documents online. Members focused on accountability, transparency, and whether the state is getting the best products and vendors. Questions addressed how contracts are vetted, how technical evaluations are performed, how financial consequences are used for missed deliverables, how public records and confidential information are handled, and how the state screens vendors for foreign-concern or bad-actor issues. Witnesses said agencies rely on technical experts for evaluations, that contract terms should include measurable deliverables and meaningful financial consequences, and that agencies—not procurement staff—generally manage performance, though Florida Digital Service oversees large IT projects of $10 million or more. The committee then shifted to broader policy discussion, including Senate Bill 7026 and proposals to reorganize state IT governance. Several members argued for stronger centralization under a state CIO or similar enterprise authority, while others cautioned against abrupt restructuring and stressed the need for a transition plan. Members also raised concerns about workforce retention, consulting services, recurring project overruns, and the need for better planning and periodic monitoring. No votes were taken; the meeting ended with the chair thanking members and staff and adjourning the subcommittee.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Our testimony offers the collective assessment of the 18 U.S. intelligence elements making up the U.S
  • of the Director of National Intelligence provides oversight over these different 18 intelligence elements
  • Leaders within those elements are empowered with that responsibility to uphold the trust that the.
Summary: The Senate Intelligence Committee convened for a significant meeting focused on the Annual Worldwide Threats Hearing. Prominent officials from various intelligence agencies presented their insights on emerging national security threats, including concerns over increasing cyber threats, particularly from China and non-state actors. A major discussion point included the balance between national security and civil liberties, as evidenced by conversations surrounding Section 702 of FISA and its implications for privacy protection. The challenges posed by cartels and transnational criminal organizations, especially related to narcotics trafficking, were emphasized as pressing issues necessitating coordinated responses from federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. This meeting underscored the necessity of public-private partnerships to tackle these multifaceted threats effectively.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 25th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, it does say image, so I'm not sure if audio would be captured, but there's going to be two elements
  • House Bill 1121, there was also that addition of joint several liability, right for so there is that element
  • The Constitution says that the state has to prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt
Bills: HB207, HB235
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 25th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • But there's going to be two elements, right?
  • So there is that element as well. Right, thank you. Any other questions?
  • That the state has to prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt for it to come in.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

TRS-EIG, TRS Public Hearings 02-05-2026

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • 3752.3 3752.3 3752.3 which<00:08:13.360> has<00:08:13.520> certain<00:08:13.840> elements
  • <00:08:14.319> for<00:08:14.639> special which has certain elements for special which
  • has certain elements for special funds<00:08:15.440> in<00:08:15.680> establishing<00:
  • that might be very difficult for prosecution to utilize this charge effectively, proving all the elements
  • that we would need um to the elements that we would need um to hold<01:25:20.080> somebody<01
Summary: The committees heard testimony on several transportation-related measures. SB 2356, relating to parking, drew support from the Office of Planning, the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission, Appleseed Center, Realtors, and the Hawaii Bicycling League. Members discussed the bill in the context of the planned stadium-area mixed-use development, with questions about whether parking would be built in structures rather than as large surface lots. Senators expressed support and noted the measure’s broader housing and parking-reduction goals, but no vote was taken during the hearing. The bulk of the hearing focused on SB 2699, which would create a fare-free youth transit program, a special fund, annual evaluations, and appropriations tied to the environmental, energy, and food security tax. The Attorney General’s office raised technical concerns about whether the special fund met statutory requirements. The Department of Education and Department of Health supported the bill, as did the City and County of Honolulu DOT, Appleseed Center, Hawaii Youth Transportation Council, Public Health Institute, Hawaii Children’s Action Network, Hawaii Bicycling League, Our Children’s Trust, and numerous youth testifiers. Supporters emphasized reduced family transportation costs, better school attendance, improved health and mobility, and environmental benefits. One senator raised emergency-planning concerns about how children using free transit would be handled during events like tsunamis; DOT and DOE responded that emergency procedures are being developed. The chair said the committee would work on language changes, including a delayed effective date to July 2027, and defer decision-making until the 12th. The final measure discussed was SB 2470, which would require leading pedestrian intervals, accessible pedestrian signals, and other safety improvements at state-controlled intersections, and create a process for community requests for accessible pedestrian signals. Appleseed Center, the Hawaii Association of the Blind, and the Disability Rights Center supported the bill, citing pedestrian safety, reduced collisions, and the need for audible cues for blind and low-vision pedestrians. Testifiers urged a phased-in approach that prioritizes high-traffic intersections. The hearing ended with the bill still under consideration and no final vote announced.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 01/16/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • They primarily used an element of comparison of a price per front foot or a combination of a site value
  • 00:54:38.160> an properties um they primarily used an properties um they primarily used an element
  • 00:54:40.079> of<00:54:40.240> a<00:54:40.480> price<00:54:40.799> per element
  • of comparison of a price per element of comparison of a price per front<00:54:41.559> foot<00
  • of industry in our an important element of industry in our state<01:01:07.760> thank<01:01:07.920
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Ethics Board May 20th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • Each allegation is missing a necessary element for them to show a violation of the Ethics and Public
  • understanding to understand Representative Simmons' argument, which is basically that there's a critical element
Summary: The Washington State Office of Administrative Hearings held oral argument before the Legislative Ethics Board in the matter of Representative Tara Simmons, docketed as Legislative Ethics Board case 2025-5. The hearing concerned Simmons’ motion for summary judgment in an ethics complaint alleging violations of RCW 42.52.020 (conflicts of interest) and RCW 42.52.070 (special privileges), based on her work involving an EEC proviso, her employment relationship with EEC, a campaign surplus donation connected to AEJG and Jerry Stone, her involvement in an AEJG-EEC subcontract dispute, and related text messages with Anthony Powers. No evidence was taken; the session focused on legal argument over whether the alleged facts, if accepted as true, were sufficient to establish violations as a matter of law. Simmons’ counsel argued the complaint was legally insufficient because the alleged actions benefited her employer or others, not Simmons herself, and that existing board opinions allow legislators to support employers absent a direct personal benefit. He also argued the board was effectively trying to adopt a new bright-line rule prohibiting legislators from funding employers, which he said would be an improper retroactive change. Board staff, through Assistant Attorney General Julia Eisentrout, opposed summary judgment and argued the facts were enough to show Simmons had an indirect financial or other interest in EEC’s funding, that her job duties and legislative actions created conflicts, and that her actions around the donation, subcontract dispute, and text messages could be viewed as using her position to secure special privileges. A board member asked whether the allegations themselves were sufficient and whether the standard required assuming the facts as alleged; staff responded that the motion failed because the record contained sufficient facts to proceed, and that any factual disputes should be resolved at hearing. After rebuttal, the ALJ closed the oral argument and turned the matter over to the Legislative Ethics Board for deliberation. No ruling was issued during the hearing, and the board was to decide whether to grant the summary judgment motion or set the case for an evidentiary hearing.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So if there's a question about whether in a particular the elements of the offense were met, or whether
  • in criminal law within the Texas judicial system making the decisions about evidence suppression elements
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Criminal Justice Mar 11th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • A PROBLEM WITH ENHANCING THE PENALTY FOR CRIMINAL STATUTE WHERE YOU ARE NOT ADDING AN ADDITIONAL ELEMENT
  • SOMETHING COMPLETELY UNRELATED LIKE A FRAUD OR A GRAND THEFT, DO YOU HAVE TO PROVE THAT AS AN ADDITIONAL ELEMENT
Keywords: 999, senate, all