Transcript Highlights:

• And, you know, House Bill 85 to see simple targeted high impact adjustment to a program that already
• And then on to the top you see claims date claim state.
• data into my database for more granular information on symptoms that they cannot de Lisi and the claims

Transcript Highlights:

• As a medical staff, we have to have the ability to adjust each of those parameters based on our community's
• And also, they keep track of legal actions taken against a physician, lawsuits, malpractice claims, and
• The bill claims to help the homeless, but it opens the door to abuse.
• However, it was claimed that those charges could not be prosecuted. or addressed because of mental health

Bills: SB1117 , SB1373 , SB672 , SB1986 , SB1098 , SB626 , SB1784 , SB2480 , SB2487 , SB437 , SB660

Committee: House Public Health

Transcript Highlights:

• lays out SB1239 by Senator Middleton relating to the choice of law and assignment. or acquisition of claims
• council draft adds the self-insured retention fund to the definitions and makes one other small adjustment
• They're trying to remove the cloud on the title from the deed, but somebody else claims to own her home
• One of the problems for the past two and a half years has been trying to sue spammers in small claims

Bills: HB1958 , HB2031 , HB2879 , HB3285 , HB3995 , HB4487 , HB4558 , HB4560 , HB4876 , HB4899 , HB5212 , HB5317 , HB5543 , HB5567 , SB1333

Committee: House Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:

• fact that my water utility was not impacted by the Caldor Fire, and we have never filed an insurance claim
• Maybe right-sizing it or adjusting it to be more relevant to issues would be correct.
• prior activities according to this bill, would not the employer that got hurt potentially not have a claim
• So the 1099 worker wouldn't be subject to a, I guess, historical workers' compensation claim.

Summary: The Assembly Insurance Committee met as a subcommittee and heard several bills focused on insurance transparency, wildfire mitigation, market access, and workforce issues. AB 75 would require insurers to give homeowners 30 days’ notice before collecting aerial images of their property and allow homeowners to review those images; supporters said it would improve privacy and prevent inaccurate non-renewals, while consumer and industry groups both sought amendments. AB 234 would add the Assembly Speaker and Senate President pro Tem, or designees, as non-voting members on the California FAIR Plan governing committee; the Department of Insurance supported it as an oversight measure, while Consumer Federation of California said it was only a small first step toward broader transparency reforms. AB 428 would let water corporations join joint powers authorities for pooled insurance, with supporters citing rising insurance costs for small water systems and no remaining opposition after amendments. AB 943 would streamline producer pre-licensing education by removing the 20-hour per-line requirement while keeping ethics training; industry sponsors said it would reduce barriers to entry, while consumer advocates warned it could lower professional standards. AB 1209 would create a pathway for cannabis employers to secure workers’ compensation coverage and related services through a state-coordinated network; supporters said it would help bring the industry into compliance, while one member raised concerns about creating a special carveout for a federally restricted industry. AB 1 would require periodic review of the state’s Safer from Wildfire regulations every five years, and it drew broad support from the department, insurers, local governments, and industry groups as a way to keep wildfire mitigation incentives current. The committee also took up a consent calendar including AB 69, AB 487, and AB 570, all of which were sent to Appropriations. The committee approved AB 75 to Privacy and Consumer Protection, AB 234 to the Assembly Floor, AB 428 to Local Government, AB 943 to Appropriations, AB 1209 to Business and Professions, and AB 1 to Appropriations. Most measures passed on strong or unanimous votes after members added coauthor requests and expressed support for the bills’ consumer protection, transparency, or wildfire-related goals.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> claims and their concerns unimportant. claims and their concerns unimportant.
• also tells our constituents<00:30:06.480><c> that</c><00:30:06.640><c> their</c><00:30:06.880><c> claims
• </c><00:30:07.200><c> against</c> constituents that their claims against constituents that their claims
• I was a yes previously on this bill, and since then, I was contacted by an owner of a public adjusting
• Uh, he explained to me adjusting firm.

Bills: SB141 , SB124 , SB56 , SJR116 , SB94 , SB37 , SB127 , SB197 , SB66 , SB70 , SB133 , SB160 , SB214 , SB312 , SB52 , SJR62 , SJR75

Transcript Highlights:

• Their experience has been that their disaster-resistant initiatives have led to fewer claims in a culture
• </c> claims in a culture of preparedness. claims in a culture of preparedness.
• or for employees to file wage claims for any sort of direct tips, &gt;&gt; Thank<00:43:29.520><c> you
• or for employees to file adjustments or for employees to file wage<00:44:15.920><c> claims</c><00:44
• ><c> sort</c><00:44:16.800><c> of</c><00:44:16.960><c> direct</c><00:44:17.440><c> tips,</c> Wage claims

Committee: Senate Commerce

Transcript Highlights:

• During this time, ophthalmology has often claimed that expanding optometry scope would lead to blindness
• </c><00:04:37.919><c> that</c> opthalmology has often claimed that opthalmology has often claimed that
• Opponents claim this bill compromises patient safety.
• Opponents claim this bill provider.
• Opponents claim this bill compromises<00:14:11.600><c> patient</c><00:14:12.000><c> safety.

Committee: House Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><01:41:18.000><c> the</c> mitigating factors of uh adjusting the mitigating factors of uh adjusting
• Reworld, who operates the H Power incinerator and would operate this plant to recycle this ash, claims
• Roger Babcock also has described it as being like sand, which is a false claim and is nothing like sand
• </c><02:01:52.159><c> and</c><02:01:52.320><c> is</c> sand, which is a false claim and is sand, which
• is a false claim and is nothing<02:01:52.800><c> like</c><02:01:53.040><c> sand</c><02:01:53.520><c>

Committee: House Water & Land

Summary: The committee heard several bills on water, land, housing, permitting, and historic preservation. For SB 746/SD2/HD1 on invasive species, DLNR and the Department of Agriculture supported the intent but warned that a bounty approach for coconut rhinoceros beetle could have unintended consequences, divert resources from biocontrol research, and be vulnerable to abuse; Hawaii Farm Bureau supported the measure. The committee also heard SB 1541 on the WoE water system, with testimony from ADC, Kunia Village Title Holding Company, and Farm Bureau in support, emphasizing the importance of the system for agriculture and the high cost of water on lands already dedicated to farming. The most extensive discussion was on SB 66, relating to building permit review and county permitting authority. DPP opposed the bill, saying the problem is not just agency review time but the broader permitting process, including applicant corrections, outside-agency review, staffing shortages, and low pay that make it hard to fill vacancies. DPP said it already meets or beats existing review deadlines for residential permits and is using tools like electronic plans and AI to help applicants submit better plans. Several supporters, including Iron Workers Local 625, an individual witness, and Hawaii Food Industry Association, backed the bill but urged a pilot program or other safeguards; some also asked for broader permit coverage beyond single-family homes. Committee members questioned DPP about whether applicant correction time should count against the clock, whether self-certification could be used, and whether the state should fund any new mandate. The committee then took up SB 26 on affordable housing, with HHFDC, OPSD, and HCDA in support and no opposition noted. Finally, on SB 1263 relating to historic preservation, HHFDC and DLNR supported the bill, while OHA offered comments and requested amendments, especially on the new risk-based review process for high-, medium-, and low-risk areas. OHA said the new procedure should be implemented carefully and allowed more time, describing it as a pilot that should be done well to be useful while still protecting cultural and historic resources. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• a larger size, and we found the compromise size at 150,000 square feet, that what we would do is adjust
• we would do 150,000 square fet that what we would do is<00:23:52.919><c> to</c><00:23:53.200><c> adjust
• the fee schedule so that is to adjust the fee schedule so that there<00:23:56.279><c> the</c><00:23:
• cost would increase from 100 that claims cost would increase from 100 to<01:14:23.320><c> 500,000</c
• to just as we do the same with claimed to just as we do the same with um<02:23:39.680><c> gas</c><02

Committee: Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> claims about uh abuse there. claims about uh abuse there.
• There is a big difference between a claim and a settlement.
• </c> each of these claims each of these claims for<00:51:16.400><c> legitimacy.
• </c> Youth Development Center Claims Youth Development Center Claims Administration<00:59:07.080><c>
• </c><01:08:34.200><c> against</c> federal funds that we can claim against federal funds that we can claim

Summary: Division Three of the Finance Committee met in work session on April 20, 2026, to consider Senate Bills 481, 603, and 663, with the discussion focused primarily on SB 481, relative to the sale of the Sununu Youth Services Center property. The chair explained that the bill was advisory only and that the committee’s recommendations would go to full Finance on April 27. For SB 481, members reviewed conflicting provisions in the prior budget law about whether sale proceeds should go to the general fund or the Youth Development Center Claims and Administration Settlement Fund, and the bill was described as a compromise that would direct proceeds to the general fund before June 30, 2027, and to the settlement fund after that date. It was noted that the settlement fund had originally received about $20 million and had roughly $10 million remaining. The committee also received an extensive update from DCYF Director Marie Noonan on the new Youth Development Center in Hampstead. She reported that construction remained on schedule, with major structural and interior work complete, substantial completion expected in late summer or early fall 2026, and occupancy anticipated in early 2027. The presentation highlighted the facility’s design features, including single-occupancy bedrooms, sensory rooms, an education wing, medical and clinical suites, visitation space, a gym, and multiple outdoor courtyards, all intended to support a trauma-informed setting. Members asked about the facility’s funding, square footage, fencing, and scanner; staff said the building is about 34,000 square feet, funded entirely with federal ARPA state recovery funds to date, and that the scanner is on site but not yet operational pending policy and staff training. Committee members also raised concerns about the facility’s design and security. In response, DCYF said some concrete walls are required for structural and safety reasons, but they are being painted to maintain a brighter environment, and that the fencing will be about 15 feet high with privacy netting because the campus is shared with Hampstead. Officials said the new facility is legislatively limited to a maximum of 12 youth, while the current center can house 12 to 18, and emphasized that courts ultimately determine placements. No votes or final actions were taken during the work session.

Transcript Highlights:

• We'd also have a claim to recoup costs from the state of California when our regional entities should
• We'd also have a claim to recoup costs from the state of California when our regional entities should
• Anyone would characterize this as a bribe, and I have escalated extensive documentation of my claims
• These are practical, targeted adjustments that help the law function as intended.
• These are practical, targeted adjustments that help the law function as intended.

Summary: The committee heard a long agenda of local government and housing-related bills, with testimony often centered on regional coordination, permitting reform, and local control. SB 802 by Senator Ashby would require Sacramento-area jurisdictions to form a joint powers authority to coordinate homelessness and housing response; supporters argued the region has long lacked accountability and coordination, while Sacramento County, Folsom, and others opposed the mandate as an unprecedented state-imposed JPA. The bill drew extensive support from local officials, business groups, service providers, and advocates, and opposition from county, city, and nonprofit representatives who said a local process was already underway. Committee members expressed support for the concept, but the bill was held pending a quorum and later discussed again with strong encouragement for regional collaboration. The committee also heard SB 222, SB 677, SB 908, SB 226, SB 828, and SB 1193. SB 222 would streamline permitting for residential heat pump and water heater installations; supporters said it would lower costs and speed clean-energy adoption, while local government groups argued the main barrier is upfront cost, not permits. SB 677 would curb what the author described as abusive appeals and delays in affordable housing approvals, with developers testifying about frivolous subdivision map appeals and TEFRA hearing delays; the California Native Plant Society sought an amendment to preserve appeals on habitat lands. SB 908 would simplify permits for energy-code-compliant window replacements, and SB 226 would clarify financing authority for a West Sacramento baseball stadium proposal; both passed unanimously. SB 828, prompted by the Esparto fireworks warehouse explosion, would tighten fireworks storage and licensing rules, expand inspection and seizure authority, and increase fines; it also passed unanimously after testimony from fire officials and a pyrotechnic operator who opposed it unless amended. SB 1193, a county-specific Alameda County transparency bill, generated the sharpest debate. The author argued it would prevent waste, favoritism, and conflicts of interest in discretionary spending by requiring board approval, a public spending log, and clearer whistleblower procedures. Alameda County and county associations opposed it as overly broad and burdensome, saying existing processes already provide transparency and that the bill would reduce flexibility during fiscal stress. After committee questions about the bill’s purpose and the county’s current practices, the measure passed 7-0, with the author indicating willingness to accept an amendment restoring a four-fifths vote threshold. The committee then moved out of order to SB 1090, which would impose a temporary moratorium on state housing density laws in Altadena through 2030 in response to post-fire displacement concerns. The author said the bill is intended to protect long-term residents from investor-driven redevelopment after the Eaton Fire, while acknowledging amendments to align the moratorium with affordable housing development timelines. The transcript cuts off during the presentation of this bill, so no final action is shown for SB 1090 in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• barracks at Birkenau, and bear collective witness to the crematoria, the machinery of death that claimed
• Um, this piece in particular, though, isn't being adjusted in this bill.
• being adjusted in this bill.<01:04:22.000><c> We're</c><01:04:22.240><c> simply</c><01:04:22.559><c>
• Another was to make an adjustment to population that was changed in this building about three years ago
• </c><01:30:47.120><c> to</c> more aligned with the values we claim to more aligned with the values we

Transcript Highlights:

• I keep telling my members and people in the community, they only have a quick claim deed.
• We have a patent, and they have a quick claim deed.
• People that had quick claim deeds, and there's a discrepancy there.
• the claim to individual law.
• Anything that's under our scope is covered by what's called FTCA, Federal Tort Claims.

Committee: House House Rural Development, Land Grants And Cultural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:

• We do have to be able to adjust what we do here to be able to manage that.
• Remember, Senate Bill 1144 is a cost-of-living adjustment for our retired teachers.
• ago and a 6% cost-of-living adjustment for those who retired...
• ago and a 6% cost of living adjustment of those who retired.
• Members, this is a cost-of-living adjustment for our retired state employees.

Bills: HB3312 , HB3700 , HB2981 , HB2961 , HB3016 , HB4478 , HB4326 , HB3025 , HB3710 , HB4125 , HB2951 , HB3082 , HB4142 , HB4106 , HB1752 , HB3268 , HB4440 , HJR1067 , SB1144 , SB1145 , SB1146 , SB1147 , SB1148 , SB1156 , SB1157 , SB1158 , SB1159 , SB1161 , SB1162 , SB1163 , SB1164 , SB1165 , SB1166 , SB1149 , SB1167 , HJR1024 , SB1174 , SB1175 , SB1176 , HB3419 , HB3748 , HB4335 , HB3057 , HB3279 , HB4428 , HB3420 , HB3040 , HB4140 , HB1638 , HB3298 , HB4113 , HB1082 , HB4301 , HB3269 , HB3587 , HB4226 , HB4324 , HB4339 , HB4342 , HB3278 , HB3996 , HB4236 , HB4352

Summary: The Senate first took up House Bill 4440, a proposal related to Medicaid expansion. Pro Tem Paxton said the measure would move parts of the expansion from the Constitution into statute, add work requirements for able-bodied adults, and create a trigger if the federal FMAP match falls below 90%. Supporters argued this would give the Legislature more flexibility to manage costs and protect the program long term, while opponents said it would weaken voter-approved constitutional protections and could lead to reduced coverage or benefits. After extended debate, the bill itself passed 30-8, but the separate motion to place it on an August special election ballot failed 30-9. The Senate then advanced and passed H.J.R. 1067, a related November ballot measure that would repeal the constitutional Medicaid expansion obligation entirely; it passed 29-8. The chamber then considered several retirement cost-of-living adjustment bills. SB 1144 would provide a 3% or 6% COLA for retired teachers depending on years retired, while ending a dedicated revenue apportionment once the system reaches 100% funded or in 2036. Senators raised concerns about the long-term funding changes, but the bill passed 43-1. SB 1145 provided similar COLAs for retired state employees and passed 41-4. SB 1146 offered COLAs for police retirees and passed unanimously 48-0. SB 1147, a COLA for firefighters and volunteer firefighters with estimated added unfunded liability, was also adopted by the Senate after committee approval and proceeded to final passage as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• DDS went so far as to claim my home was not accessible, despite us also being shared living providers
• DDS went so far as to claim my home was not accessible, despite us also being shared living providers
• I'm a school adjustment counselor at Belchertown High School and the president of the Belchertown Education
• As a school adjustment counselor, I work with special needs students.
• But there were 12 students for whom we did not meet that threshold for claiming, which creates a situation

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Education

Summary: The Joint Committee on Education held a hearing focused primarily on special education-related bills, with testimony centered on two major themes: transition planning for students aging out of school-based services at age 22, and the fiscal strain special education costs place on districts. Committee members explained hearing procedures, noted the House was in formal session, and periodically stepped out for votes while staff recorded testimony. A separate bill on special education due process was also taken up briefly, along with a bill on special education finance and another on equitable access/data reporting. On House Bill 752 and Senate Bill 313, witnesses from the Arc of Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress, the Developmental Disabilities Council, families, self-advocates, and Senator Comerford described the “Turning 22” transition as a crisis point that often leaves families without adult placements, services, or clear communication. Testimony emphasized earlier planning, more accountability, better data collection, and a commission to improve coordination and residential placement. Several parents and advocates shared personal accounts of traumatic transitions, delayed placements, and the need for plans to begin at least a year before age 22. The committee later closed testimony on these bills after hearing from all signed-up speakers. House Bill 4217, on special education due process, drew support from Representative Sullivan-Almeida, parents, and advocates who argued that the burden of proof should shift from families to school districts. Testimony described costly legal battles, delays, and parents having to become experts in reading instruction or hire advocates and attorneys to secure services. Brody Dwyer, a 10-year-old student with dyslexia, and his mother described how evidence-based instruction helped him after years of struggle. The committee also heard testimony on House Bill 546/Senate Bill 317, which would require DESE to publish cross-tabulated data on race, disability, gender, income, and other factors; advocates said this would better expose disparities and help address the school-to-prison pipeline. Finally, on House Bill 691/Senate Bill 430, school leaders, educators, and union representatives testified that special education costs are outpacing district budgets and that increasing circuit breaker reimbursement and creating a commission to study long-term sustainability would help prevent staffing cuts and service reductions. No votes were taken during the hearing; the committee repeatedly closed testimony on individual bills as speakers finished and moved through the agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• energy, and of other inputs are higher here than anywhere else in the country, and our farmers can't adjust
• energy, and of other inputs are higher here than anywhere else in the country, and our farmers can't adjust
• Some scientists claim to have perfected tank conditions to allow the animals to live together without
• Such claims are unproven trade secrets.
• These are not theoretical claims.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Agriculture and Fisheries

Summary: The Joint Committee on Agriculture opened its first hearing by outlining procedures, including three-minute testimony limits, written testimony options, and the plan to hear 27 bills in docket order. The committee then took testimony on H.11/S.53, a resolve promoting equity in agriculture, with advocates from the Massachusetts Food System Collaborative, Southeastern Mass Agricultural Partnership, and urban farming organizations describing racial and economic disparities in farming, lack of data on BIPOC farmers, barriers to land and capital, and the need for a commission to collect information and recommend policy changes. Committee members asked questions about the importance of data collection and future policy development, and the bill was repeatedly urged to be reported favorably out of committee. Testimony also supported H.118, which would create a special commission to examine the strengths and sustainability of the Commonwealth’s emergency food network. The Amherst Survival Center described serving 1.6 million meals last year and explained that food pantries are now functioning as essential parts of the state’s food system while relying heavily on donations, volunteers, and unstable funding. Members discussed the need for a more holistic look at food security infrastructure. The committee then heard H.119/S.60 on climate change impacts on farms and fisheries, with regional planners and farm advocates describing flood damage, rising costs, canceled federal climate-smart funding, and the need for direct state support for adaptation, resilience, and infrastructure improvements. The committee also heard testimony on H.125/H.142/S.65, a healthy soils bill, from landscape professionals who said construction sites often leave poor or stripped soil and that the bill would require better post-construction soil standards to support healthier landscapes and reduce long-term maintenance and environmental problems. Finally, the committee took extensive testimony on H.127, which would prohibit aquaculture of octopus for human consumption. Supporters, including legislators, scientists, veterinarians, students, and animal welfare advocates, argued octopus are highly intelligent and sentient, cannot be farmed humanely, and that octopus aquaculture would create environmental harms such as waste runoff, pressure on wild fish stocks, and ecosystem disruption. No votes were taken during the hearing; the bills were heard and testimony was received.

Transcript Highlights:

• Previous legislation established an adjustment factor for programs to utilize funding to implement early
• child care, and family child care home education network providers will be able to utilize the adjustment
• extended family members and tribally approved foster homes, and two, enabling agencies to be eligible to claim
• extended family members and tribally approved foster homes, and two, enabling agencies to be eligible to claim
• Tribally approved foster homes, and, two, enabling agencies to be eligible to claim Title IV federal

Summary: The committee heard several child welfare, food assistance, child care, and developmental services bills. AB 308 would require a statewide evaluation of regional center safety training and crisis-response services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities; supporters said it would help reduce reliance on law enforcement and improve de-escalation and emergency preparedness. AB 1049 would remove sponsor deeming from the California Food Assistance Program, with supporters from food banks and legal aid arguing the rule creates confusion, chilling effects, and wrongful denials, while one member raised concerns about accountability and fraud. AB 1201 would narrow when a parent’s prior violent felony can bar reunification services, limiting the bypass to offenses involving a child or a child’s other parent/guardian; county and advocacy witnesses said the bill preserves judicial discretion and avoids automatic denials, though a member expressed concern about child safety in violent or criminal environments. AB 2379 would require family child care providers to be notified of constitutional rights and receive multilingual training regarding immigration enforcement; it drew broad support and no opposition. AB 2429 would make ACEs screening optional and reduce required classroom observations in the early childhood mental health consultation program, with supporters saying it would reduce administrative burdens and expand participation. AB 1755 would eliminate CalWORKs’ 100-hour monthly work penalty for two-parent families, and supporters said it would reduce poverty and administrative burden without changing income eligibility. AB 1981, presented later, would advance “true cost of care” child care rate reform, with providers describing the current reimbursement system as unsustainable. AB 2478 would create a streamlined kinship family approval pathway for foster care placements with relatives and other kin, and AB 1969 and AB 1996 would create statewide structures to coordinate cradle-to-career services and reduce child poverty, respectively; both were presented as data-driven, place-based efforts to align services and set measurable reduction goals. Most bills received strong support from county agencies, advocacy organizations, and service providers, with little or no opposition testimony. Members generally praised the goals of the measures but asked questions about implementation, accountability, and child safety in the reunification and benefits bills. The committee took roll calls on the bills it heard, and the votes shown in the transcript were largely unanimous or near-unanimous, with several measures held on call after passing committee votes. AB 1049 was voted out 2-1, AB 1201 and AB 2379 were each voted out 3-0, AB 2429 and AB 1755 were voted out 2-0, and AB 2478, AB 1969, and AB 1996 were each voted out 2-0; the chair repeatedly noted that some bills would remain on call pending absent members. AB 1981 drew extensive support testimony from child care providers and allies, but the committee did not take a final vote in the portion of the transcript provided because no motion was available at that moment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Previous legislation established an adjustment factor for programs to utilize funding to implement early
• child care, and family child care home education network providers will be able to utilize the adjustment
• extended family members and tribally approved foster homes, and two, enabling agencies to be eligible to claim
• extended family members and tribally approved foster homes, and two, enabling agencies to be eligible to claim
• Tribally approved foster homes, and, two, enabling agencies to be eligible to claim Title IV federal

Committee: Senate Human Services

Transcript Highlights:

• Changes include adjustments to the bonus depreciation tax and the GILTI tax, which is the Global Intangible
• Our FNS-based grants for food and administration need to be accounted for and adjusted accordingly.
• So, kind of a little bit of a graph here and what has gone on this year with how much we spent on claims
• We have approximately $215 million that we've spent for the school year 2024-2025 in claims. $169 million
• What is your contingency plan if the federal claims shrink?

Committee: House Water & Natural Resources Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• Basically what it does is it gives the current trust fund set up for as a backstop for workers comp claims
• It allows reasonable reinspection fees for significant health violations and adjust sound permit regulations
• I mean the consumer will make an adjustment. people are getting sick there.
• These aggressive sale tactics often involve false claims of tax credits and benefits of fully offsetting
• This would set up a scenario where the customer would have to claim dibs on the car, sight unseen before

Bills: SB264 , SB542 , SB924 , SB1008 , SB1029 , SB1036 , SB1057 , SB1058 , SB1185 , SB1202 , SB1358 , SB1364 , SB1376 , SB1569 , SB1664 , SB1697 , SJR50

Committee: Senate Business & Commerce