Transcript Highlights:

• have of Consumer Protection uh we have of Consumer Protection uh we have offered<00:52:24.920>
• But please protect the consumers of Hawaii.
• But please protect the consumers of Hawaii.
• the consumers of but please protect the consumers of Hawaii<01:06:07.119> they<01:06:07.200><
• Protection and we Office of Consumer Protection and we plan plan plan to<01:40:46.560> um<01:

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several measures, beginning with SB 1343, which would amend quorum requirements for the Small Business Regulatory Review Board. The board chair testified in support, saying it has been difficult to fill all seats and that using active seats for quorum would help the board function more effectively. No opposition or questions were raised, and the committee moved on. The committee then heard SB 1578, which drew mixed testimony. DBEDT supported the measure and the Attorney General suggested inserting preamble language from HB 1025 to provide historical context on the East-West Center. Austin Martin of the Libertarian Party of Hawaiʻi opposed the bill, arguing it could invite improper behavior, create loosely regulated satellite offices, increase foreign influence, and add competition for land ownership. The committee took no vote during the hearing. The bulk of the meeting focused on SB 1641, a measure to establish a Hawaiʻi film commission/authority and related funding and governance structure. DBEDT supported the intent and offered friendly amendments to clarify the distinction between film and media industries, while the Honolulu Film Office and labor representatives from IATSE, Teamsters, and Pride at Work supported the bill but urged changes. Their concerns centered on conflicts of interest, especially having producers on the commission, and they asked for more labor representation and clearer oversight rules. The Attorney General raised constitutional and special-fund concerns, saying the grant standards and special-fund language needed work. Committee members discussed renaming the entity as a Hawaiʻi Film Authority, broadening its scope beyond cultural production, adjusting the commission makeup, and clarifying funding sources, including the existing film and creative industries fund and the 0.2% rebate contribution. No final vote was taken in the portion provided, but members indicated the bill would need substantial revisions and an HD1.

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill was referred to the Committee on Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection.
• The bill will be referred to the Committee on Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection.
• The bill will be referred to the Committee on Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection.
• Senate Bill 1046, a bill to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act.
• The bill was referred to the Committee on Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection. Mr.

Summary: The Senate met with 27 members present and a quorum, opened with an invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance, and then moved through a series of motions, recesses, and introductions of bills. Several new bills were read and referred, including measures affecting the Income Tax Act, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, public utilities, nondisclosure agreements, data centers and community benefit agreements, zoning, Medicaid false claims, and the Neighborhood Enterprise Zone Act, with referrals mainly to finance, energy and environment, and housing and human services committees. In the Committee of the Whole, Senate Bills 592, 49, and 50 were reported without amendment and advanced. On third reading, the Senate passed Senate Bills 900, 820, 966, 967, 968, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, and 978. SB 900 dealt with the Vehicle Code, SB 820 with election law, SB 966 and SBs 974-978 with housing and insurance-related changes, and SB 967 with the Income Tax Act. SB 966, 967, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, and 978 all passed on 20-16 votes, while SB 900 passed 35-1. Senate Bill 973, creating a state-based health insurance exchange as a nonprofit corporation, drew the most debate. Senators Weber, Lindsay, and Halk offered amendments, all of which were defeated after recorded votes; Weber argued for cost controls and consumer savings, while supporters said the bill would give Michigan more control over health care decisions and could lower premiums. Senator Irwin spoke in support of the housing-related package, saying it would help address the state’s housing shortage. Senate Bill 592, concerning the Corrections Code, was also passed after a 31-5 vote, with Senator Lindsay explaining his no vote as concern about how the bill treats juvenile offenders. The Senate also adopted Senate Resolution 133, urging the U.S. Department of Agriculture to honor commitments to Michigan farmers participating in the Rural Energy for America Program. Senator McCann supported the resolution, citing farm losses from federal rollbacks, while Senator McBroom gave a strong no-vote explanation criticizing state energy policy and the resolution’s framing. The session ended with remarks recognizing Juneteenth and an anecdotal bipartisan exchange between senators before the chamber adjourned until June 23 at 10:00 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• Consumers deserve accurate information, and our marine ecosystems deserve stronger protection.
• It's very important for consumer protection.
• The motion is due pass to the Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee
• The motion is due pass to the Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee
• The motion is due pass to the Senate Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection Committee

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard a series of Assembly bills, with no formal votes taken because the committee was operating without a quorum and repeatedly noted that motions and votes would occur later when a quorum was present. Several measures drew broad support and no opposition, while others generated both support and opposition testimony on policy and legal grounds. AB 1744, the Clear Labels, Clear Seas Act, would prohibit sunscreen products marketed as reef safe, reef friendly, or similar terms from containing chemical UV filters. The author and student supporters said the bill is a truth-in-labeling measure meant to prevent greenwashing and protect marine ecosystems; Consumer Reports also supported it. No opposition was offered, and senators praised the student advocates. AB 713 would allow undocumented students at UC, CSU, and community colleges to access campus jobs. The author, a law professor, and many student and immigrant-rights organizations supported it, arguing it would reduce exploitation and improve affordability and retention; a few opponents argued it would conflict with federal law. Committee members expressed strong support and personal reflections on the issue. AB 1359 would let people age 80 and older opt out of jury service without a doctor’s note, and supporters said it would reduce burdens on older adults and people with Alzheimer’s or other conditions; there was no opposition. AB 2563 would standardize and clarify definitions of sex discrimination across California codes. Supporters, including women’s rights and reproductive health groups, said it would strengthen and harmonize protections; opponents argued it would blur distinctions between sex and gender identity and create legal conflicts. AB 1705 would require websites hosting sexually explicit content to verify consent for depicted persons before upload; supporters framed it as a response to nonconsensual pornography, while TechNet opposed the bill as overbroad for sites that prohibit such content, though Senator Wiener said he would support it while seeking further privacy-related amendments. The committee also heard AB 1940 on menopause-related workplace protections, with supporters saying it would clarify existing rights and improve workplace awareness, while the Chamber of Commerce opposed expanding the protected-class framework and urged reliance on reasonable accommodation law. AB 1824 would incorporate ICWA and Cal-ICWA protections into the Probate Code to prevent guardianship proceedings from being used to bypass tribal child welfare protections; tribal representatives and advocates strongly supported it and no opposition appeared. AB 2115 would issue a formal legislative apology to California Native peoples for historic state violence and discrimination and place a commemorative plaque at the Capitol; Native leaders and allies supported it, and committee members offered strong remarks in favor. AB 2076 would add nitrous oxide to age-verification restrictions on dangerous online products, prohibit purchase with gift cards or store credit, and increase penalties for large sellers; supporters cited youth misuse and public safety harms, and TechNet/CCIA moved from opposition to neutral. AB 2783 would expand court reporter licensure reciprocity and extend a remote court reporting pilot, with support from court reporters and the Judicial Council and no opposition. AB 1916 would include American Sign Language interpreters in the court interpreter collective bargaining framework; interpreters and disability advocates supported it, while the Judicial Council opposed it, saying the act was designed for spoken-language interpretation and the amendment did not fully resolve implementation concerns.

Transcript Highlights:

• And, you know, you could look at it from the consumer protection standpoint that the sooner that the
• That this individual had a problem in another state, the better consumer protection that we have.
• They have to protect 40 hours so that if there is something catastrophic when they They have to protect
• And we will, of course, be passing that along to consumers.
• And this will result in higher consumer prices. Thank you, ma'am.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• enforcement, and consumers. enforcement, and consumers.
• municipalities, and the consumer. municipalities, and the consumer.
• choice to the consumer.
• choice to the consumer.
• should not undermine those protections should not undermine those protections or<00:56:12.440>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• already consumer protection laws that already consumer protection laws that already exist<00:10:
• committees to pass uh consumer committees to pass uh consumer protection<01:25:14.080> legislation
• really good common sense consumer really good common sense consumer protection<01:26:30.840>
• The second part of consumer<01:29:59.199> consumer<01:29:59.760> pro<01:30:00.400> protection
• <01:30:01.280> is consumer consumer pro protection is consumer consumer pro protection is

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• For CDHA, it's really a worker protection issue.
• But also with that, we must ensure that the DAs are protected and not handling utensils or interacting
• protection, maintain consumer access to critical services, and support economic growth.
• protection guardrails.
• protection.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then energy is what we're familiar with as kilowatt-hours, and that's what we consume.
• We are primarily a residential consumer state. input of how Florida is structured.
• In your presentation, you mentioned data centers as being a trend that consumes...
• Chair, but what protections do our grids have, whether it is FPL or Duke or municipalities?
• And so there's other ways to protect them. And so we do coastal hardening.

Summary: The committee heard introductory remarks from Chair LaMarca and members, then received presentations on electric utility planning, transportation infrastructure, and broadband deployment. Public Service Commission staff explained how Florida’s utilities plan for reliability and cost through 10-year site plans, demand forecasting, and economic dispatch. The presentation emphasized Florida’s residential-heavy load, growing EV demand, expanding solar and battery storage, continued reliance on natural gas combined-cycle plants, and the role of nuclear power. Members asked about energy efficiency, rates, renewable options beyond solar, cybersecurity, grid resilience, data centers, and small modular nuclear reactors; the witness said efficiency programs are reviewed every five years, utilities must balance reliability and affordability, and large new loads like data centers generally must pay for their own infrastructure needs. Department of Transportation Secretary Jared Perdue described FDOT’s five-year work program, decentralized district structure, and funding mix, noting that the agency is predominantly state-funded and prioritizes maintenance and preservation before expansion. He highlighted record investment levels, major congestion-relief projects, toll-road revenues, seaport and airport partnerships, spaceport investments, workforce and equipment needs, and emerging technology such as advanced air mobility. Members asked about project timing, MPO planning, rail and ferry funding, airport governance, winter storm preparedness, and flooding/sea-level rise; Perdue said faster delivery depends on resources, local governments lead transit operations with FDOT as a capital partner, and coastal and drainage projects are designed around storm surge and resiliency. The Office of Broadband reported on six grant programs supporting infrastructure, community facilities, digital connectivity, and future digital capacity and broadband expansion. Director Leo Garcia said the office has awarded hundreds of millions of dollars across most counties, leveraged significant private investment, and focused heavily on rural areas. He noted that broadband efforts are intended to support telehealth, education, workforce development, and economic growth, and said the state has reduced the number of unserved locations from more than 400,000 to a projected 170,000 after current awards are completed. He also said the office needs additional budget authority for the upcoming digital capacity program and that the larger federal/state broadband deployment program will be used to reach remaining unserved and underserved areas.

Transcript Highlights:

• Enactment: Enhancing Child Welfare Protections, House No. 4646. A bill has been read a third time.
• and the rights of consumers.
• Protection Act, which he sponsored alongside U.S.
• This legislation also created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent federal agency
• specifically dedicated to protecting consumers from businesses engaging in unfair and predatory tactics

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Senate took up House No. 4646, an act enhancing child welfare protections, and considered a series of amendments focused on child welfare, school discipline, truancy, foster care transparency, and related services. Several amendments were withdrawn, including Senator DiDomenico’s proposal to create a Massachusetts children’s cabinet and Senator Tarr’s amendments on timeout and isolation standards, the best-interest-of-the-child standard, and mandated reporter definitions. Other amendments were adopted, including Senator Rauch’s amendments on student transfers and reasonableness, Senator Tarr’s amendment on information management integrity and youth engagement in the Office of the Child Advocate, and the Senate Ways and Means amendment. Amendments on school compliance before CRA filings, probation certification before accepting a child requiring assistance petition, and statewide truancy and engagement standards were rejected. After the amendments were resolved, the Senate ordered the bill to a third reading and then passed it to be engrossed by a roll call vote of 39 in the affirmative and none in the negative. The chamber also adopted a motion to adjourn in memory of John Edwards and Hadley Boucher, with moments of silence held for each. Later, the Senate also adjourned in memory of former U.S. Representative Barney Frank, with remarks highlighting his civil rights work, his role in financial reform, and his historic service as the first openly gay member of Congress. Before adjournment, the Senate took up a House amendment to the Senate bill establishing the Massachusetts Data Privacy Act, voted not to concur, and requested a committee of conference. The chair appointed Senators Creem, Finegold, and O’Connor to the conference committee. The Senate then adopted an order to reconvene on Monday at 11:00 a.m. and dispense with printing a calendar, and finally adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• it is going to generate protection for consumers for prices going up.
• It provides protection.
• protections. ...from being hurt by these insurance protections.
• We don't protect institutions, we protect people, this bill... ...angle for this bill.
• That is a complete collapse of consumer and patient protection for our kids.

Keywords: 1146, all

Transcript Highlights:

• or retain any records of that consumer.
• any records of that consumer.
• We see the consumer demand in it. We see the need for regulation as well.
• We see the consumer demand in it. We see the need for regulation as well.
• Yeah, well, but also you can consume enough marijuana.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Constitutionally protected, state legal, parity.
• It is illegal to actively consume something.
• there are protections for the victims.
• Our pets are part of our families and protecting them also means protecting the children who witness
• Very intricate, very time-consuming.

Transcript Highlights:

• . the form of higher prices for consumers.
• Uh, as you to retailers and consumers.
• Unfortunately, this tax will not eliminate consumer demand for products.
• Found its way back to the consumer. And that's just the fact of life.
• have, the benefit for these consumers have, the benefit for these consumers and<00:52:09.599>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• THEY'VE ALLOWED US TO CONSUME MORE QUANTITIES OF FOOD BUT ULTIMATELY WE AS A SOCIETY AND FLORIDIANS AND
• MY NAME IS GREG COSTA, SENIOR DIRECTOR OF STATE AFFAIRS WITH CONSUMER BRANDS ASSOCIATION.
• THEY ARE JUST NOT IN THE TASTE OF FOOD CONSUMERS AND BEVERAGE CONSUMERS IN THE EU.
• AS THIS GOES ON AND CONSUMERS MAKE KNOWN WHAT IT IS THEY WANT IN AND OUT OF FOOD THE INDUSTRY REACTS
• SENATOR COLLINS I TOTALLY SUPPORT YOUR MOTIVATION TRYING TO ATTACK PROTECT FLORIDIANS FROM DANGEROUS

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• considered protected speech? considered protected speech?
• The lobbying is protected speech. Being paid to lobby is not protected speech.
• Uh that protects the state they're in.
• Now I don't personally agree protected.
• That's a very important right that we protect, and all of us on the comfort dog side are trying to protect

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It is not just consumers who are benefiting.
• And so what we did was just look at the consumer price index.
• I had authored the original AB 30 to protect 30% of our land and water by 2030.
• So that's, I think, it's really around labeling, help consumers understand.
• Many products are not yet at par with animal-sourced products on price and consumer attributes.

Summary: The Select Committee on Alternative Protein Innovation held its first informational hearing to examine the state of alternative protein research, industry growth, and policy needs in California. The chair opened by noting California’s $5 million public investment in UC research in 2022 and framed the hearing around three panels: the climate, environmental, and security potential of alternative proteins; industry scaling and commercialization; and university-led research and workforce development. Members emphasized that the committee will continue with site visits and additional hearings across the state. The first panel focused on the case for alternative proteins as a climate, land, water, biodiversity, and food-security solution. Shana Fertig of the Good Food Institute argued that plant-based, fermentation-derived, and cultivated proteins can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and water use while helping California meet its climate and conservation goals. Zane Swanson of CSIS added that alternative proteins could reduce risks tied to zoonotic disease, antimicrobial resistance, supply-chain disruption, and broader national security concerns. In questions, members discussed the role of pharmaceuticals in animal agriculture and how alternative proteins might complement, rather than replace, traditional farming by creating new markets for California crops and helping farmers diversify. The second panel featured industry leaders Ethan Brown of Beyond Meat, Myra Passick of Upside Foods, and Arye Elfenbein of Wildtype. Brown highlighted plant-based meat’s health and climate benefits, criticized misinformation campaigns against the sector, and urged better labeling, reduced subsidies for factory farming, and more plant-based food in public institutions. Passick described cultivated meat as a scalable food-production technology, said Upside Foods has already produced millions of pounds annually at its Emeryville facility, and asked for grants, low-interest loans, and possible participation in cap-and-trade or similar revenue programs. Elfenbein described cultivated seafood as a way to address overfishing, contamination, traceability problems, and the heavy import dependence of the U.S. seafood supply, while also noting conservation benefits and the need for California to remain a hub for the industry. The final panel centered on research and workforce development. UCLA’s Amy Rowat described state-funded work on technical bottlenecks such as growing fat cells and creating edible scaffolds, along with a Future Food Fellows program that trains students across science, engineering, law, and policy. UC Santa Cruz economist Galina Hale argued that alternative proteins are necessary to meet future protein demand while reducing food-system emissions, and said California must support the sector through grants, loans, procurement, and research centers to avoid losing leadership to other states and countries. The hearing ended with the chair thanking the witnesses, noting that all materials would be posted online, and saying the committee would continue building policy and budget proposals to support the sector.

Transcript Highlights:

• rural<00:20:28.360> health on consumer protection as a rural health on consumer protection
• So really, this is a consumer protection issue.
• So really, this is a consumer protection issue.
• So really, this is a consumer protection issue.
• So really, this is a consumer protection issue.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several measures, beginning with HB 205 HD1 and HB 480 HD1 on workers’ compensation. Testifiers from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations and the Department of Human Resources Development supported the bills, with DLIR saying HB 205 would codify and regulate nonprescription over-the-counter drugs at a reasonable rate, and DHRD saying HB 480 would encourage timely and accurate assessments of injured workers’ physical abilities. No opposition was raised on those measures, and the committee moved on without votes or amendments noted. On HB 331 HD1 relating to permits, the University of Hawaiʻi, the Department of Education, and the Hawaii School Facilities Authority supported the bill, while the Board of Water Supply and Greg Mikan opposed it. Supporters did not elaborate much beyond standing on written testimony, but the School Facilities Authority asked that renovations be added to the definition of repeatable projects. Opponents argued the Department of Planning and Permitting is understaffed and that bypassing or speeding the permitting review process could create problems, especially for projects requiring proper engineering review. No action was taken beyond hearing testimony. The committee also heard HB 72 HD1 on pharmacy technician regulation, with the Board of Pharmacy offering comments and the Hawaii Pharmacist Association, Walgreens, and Mōʻiliʻili Drugs supporting the measure. Supporters said pharmacy technicians already perform essential duties such as vaccinations, compounding, inventory, and dispensing, and argued Hawaiʻi is the only state without an active managed list of practicing pharmacy technicians. On HB 139 HD1 regarding insurance, the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs offered comments, and the Hawaii Society for Clinical Oncologists supported the bill, arguing fertility preservation coverage should not conflict with federal law or the prepaid health care system. On HB 32 HD1 relating to cannabis, the Attorney General and Department of Health raised concerns about allowing purchase before certification is approved, while the Hawaii Cannabis Industry Association supported the bill and suggested lowering the purchase limit from 2 ounces to 1 ounce; the Department of Health said its average turnaround is two to three business days, with about 20% of applications returned for incompleteness and an internal expedited process for certain cases. Later, the committee heard HB 470 HD1 on noise, with the Department of Health supporting the goal of reducing noise pollution but cautioning that regulating intermittent noise like string trimmers is complicated, while the Retail Merchants of Hawaiʻi opposed the bill as a hardship for small businesses and questioned the practicality of battery-powered equipment. Ted Bolan supported the measure, saying it would not ban gas leaf blowers but would require quieter models over time. The committee then heard HB 534 HD1 on labeling requirements, where DLNR and the Department of Agriculture offered comments and several fishing and consumer groups supported the bill. Testimony focused on seafood origin labeling, especially raw tuna used in poke and sushi, with DLNR explaining the bill was being narrowed to avoid federal preemption and to avoid unintentionally covering canned tuna or other processed products. Finally, the committee heard H47 HD1 on aquaculture, with the Department of Agriculture, the Hawaii Invasive Species Council, and the Agribusiness Development Corporation supporting the measure; no votes were taken on any bill during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• from the general fund for the protect from the general fund for the protect grant<00:23:02.640><
• position that moved to protection position that moved to protection services.<00:26:44.080> This
• <00:33:56.000> from public health protection from public health protection from unreasonable
• <00:42:23.960> services is going towards a protection services is going towards a protection
• So, um, it really doesn't address consumers. We would consider that a retail sale.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Conquer passing this bill protects Conquer passing this bill protects future<00:06:28.360> Merit
• With that comes the Consumer Protection Bureau's ability to seek injunctive relief, to seek penalties
• that is housed within the Consumer that is housed within the Consumer Protection<01:44:18.440>
• > large the Consumer Protection Bureau at large the Consumer Protection Bureau at large with<01
• > uh consumer protection bureau's ability uh consumer protection bureau's ability uh to<01:45:

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Convening the Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce. This is Thursday, April 10th.
• Um, and given that your agency looks at both consumers as well as commerce, the interests of both, um
• I'm executive director of the Office of Consumer Protection at DCCA. updating the landlord tenant code
• as well as commerce, the both consumers as well as commerce, the interests<00:14:37.199> of<00
• > Protection<00:15:19.600> at<00:15:20.040> DCCA.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce heard STR 123 SD1, which asks the judiciary to convene a working group to study landlord-tenant issues aimed at increasing rental housing supply and improving landlord-tenant interactions. The Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs said it had originally asked to defer the measure but was not opposed to the idea of a working group and preferred the Senate bill vehicle already introduced. Hawaii Realtors testified in strong support of the measure. Members discussed how the working group should be structured, including whether it should have balanced representation from tenant advocates and landlord-side stakeholders, with possible participation from neutral entities such as the judiciary or DCCA. DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection said the legislature should decide the composition, noted that minority views can still be advanced outside the working group, and deferred to the convenor on whether recommendations would be made by consensus or vote. In decision-making, the committee recommended passing the measure as a House Draft 1 with amendments that narrow the scope of the working group and conform it to House-Senate Bill 822. A member expressed a reservation that the bill should explicitly require equal numbers of tenant and landlord representatives to bolster community credibility. The motion passed, with one member voting aye with reservations and the recommendation adopted.