Video & Transcript Research : 'data matching'

Page 133 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Technology and Telecommunications REVISED Feb 19th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Technology and Telecommunications

Transcript Highlights:
  • I was just wondering if we have kind of maybe some data that indicates that that's a good time period
  • Pulling straight in, trying to grab personal or otherwise protected consumer data that they would have
  • There's not intent in it, but just being horribly careless about data.
  • There's an organization called Metter M E T R that measures this data.
Bills: SB1670, SB1716, SB1521
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Ways and Means Committee 4/24/25

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • She said he lets evidence and data lead the way in his decisions and thanked him for all he is doing
  • > when<00:10:22.079> you<00:10:22.240> made<00:10:22.399> your you and data
  • when you made your you and data when you made your decisions<00:10:23.120> and<00:10:23.279><
  • That includes $200,000 for the Help America Vote Act Match Fund, $79,000 for an operating adjustment
  • retention so that we can hold any data retention so that we can hold any kind<00:33:01.120> of
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Health and Human Services Oversight REVISION 2: Delayed until 11:30 AM

Health and Human Services Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • The drug manufacturers and the other entities involved have to match all that, probably more.
  • have the resources to do that sort of work, but the 2,500, you're saying, was just—it wasn't built on data
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/5/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is it to collect more data?
  • Is it to collect more data?
  • the security data. the security data.
  • There's lots of ways to redact privacy data and trade secret data. This is not right.
  • <01:26:57.440> This privacy data and trade secret data.
Bills: HF3874, HF3875, HF3378
Summary: The committee approved the March 3 minutes and then heard a presentation from the Minnesota Judicial Branch on House File 3874, which was laid over for possible inclusion in a finance bill. State Court Administrator Jeff Shorba and Chief Judge Michael Fritz testified in support of a supplemental funding request focused on judicial branch safety and security, along with funding to cover the employer share of Minnesota Paid Leave costs. Shorba said the branch is seeking help because it did not receive funding for paid leave in the last session and is having to hold positions open to absorb the cost. The safety and security request included five parts: personal data protection for judges and court administrators, home security, two additional staff positions for threat assessment and coordination, security for the chief justice at public events, and a revived courthouse security grant program for counties. Testimony emphasized rising threats and incidents involving judges and court staff, including examples of doxing, home surveillance, and threats involving litigants, and cited increases in reported incidents, threats, and disturbances. Fritz said the branch’s current response system is stretched and that more law-enforcement-trained staff would improve coordination and response. Members questioned why the judicial branch should receive state funding for paid leave when private employers must absorb the cost, and Shorba responded that the branch was excluded from end-of-session funding decisions and that the mandate should be funded for all branches of government. Members also asked about the threat-response process and whether local law enforcement should be used more directly. Another concern raised was whether State Patrol troopers assigned to judicial security would have the training needed for criminal-code enforcement, and Shorba said the branch is discussing that issue with the State Patrol. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.