Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, reading the actual language of the bill, it just says for purposes of determining whether a
• Chairman, reading the actual language of the bill, it just says for purposes of determining whether a
• quorum is physically assembled, of the bill, it just says for purposes of determining whether a quorum
• And that's why the fees are almost impossible to determine, because now it's databases and things, you
• So with that, let’s move on to judicial updates. Mr. Underwood. Thank you for having me.

Keywords: Freedom of Information Advisory Council, 976, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Advocate Selection Committee, which consisted of bipartisan members of the executive, legislative, and judicial
• She is very determined to do the best, and she has a desire to make sure that the children in the state
• At the point that she made that determination, I'm not really sure that she understood totally what it
• very... ...biased, as you can tell, but I think she'll do you an excellent job because she's very determined
• that students will receive the support necessary to succeed, and that to me includes the social determinants

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• CMS, ultimately, will work with us to determine what the final date is. Thank you.
• Ultimately, prosecutors or a court of law will determine exactly that.
• action because if you are committing fraud in one program, most likely we have enough information to determine
• Fraud in one program, most likely we have enough information to determine credible allegations of fraud
• The state agency has reviewed all allegations, facts, and evidence carefully and acts judiciously on

Transcript Highlights:

• Ultimately, the Florida Supreme Court determines how much money is released for Florida legal aid organizations
• and how Ultimately, the Florida Supreme Court determines how much money is released for Florida legal
• That's a function of the legislative or executive branch, not the judicial branch.
• that, as related to their position as an Uber driver, not just as a driver off the clock, is a determination
• sort of asking Senator Martin before, which is, isn’t that a question of fact that needs to be determined

Summary: The committee heard several bills and amendments, beginning with CS/SB 498 on trust fund interest for IOTA accounts. The sponsor said a 2023 Florida Supreme Court rule sharply increased interest paid into legal aid funding, creating a windfall and making participation difficult for banks. An amendment was adopted requiring savings institutions to pay the higher of 0.25% or the highest comparable rate offered on certain non-IOTA accounts, and the bill then passed favorably after testimony from banks, legal aid representatives, and other stakeholders both supporting and opposing the measure. The committee also approved CS/SB 232, which clarifies Florida’s consumer collection law applies only to phone calls during restricted hours and not emails or text messages, after a delete-all amendment and supportive testimony from industry groups. It then approved SB 132, as amended, to designate gold and silver as legal tender and set rules for custody, audits, electronic transfer, and government acceptance of payments; supporters called it a sound-money measure, while the banking association said it still had unresolved technical concerns. Later, the committee passed SB 1466 to create a trust fund for the My Safe Florida Home Program, with an amendment funding it from 20% of collected insurance premium tax revenue. It also considered SB 1206 on transportation network company insurance, reducing coverage during the “dead-leg” period before a rider is picked up from $1 million to lower limits; the bill drew sharp opposition from trial lawyers and support from insurers and some business groups, and the committee adopted a clarifying amendment before reporting the bill favorably. Finally, CS/SB 924 on fertility preservation for cancer patients was amended several times to narrow scope and clarify coverage rules, then passed favorably after debate over cost, preauthorization, and post-treatment storage obligations. The committee adjourned after allowing technical and conforming changes to implement the adopted amendments.

Transcript Highlights:

• while it's been functioning perfectly fine in the hallways, as the current language of the statute determines
• an opportunity to impose a longer sentencing guideline of up to 30 years instead of 15, if it's determined
• If it's determined that that's what's needed to keep our communities and families safe.
• a forensic hospital diversion pilot program in Hillsborough County in conjunction with the 13th Judicial
• He spent hundreds of days in jail before they determined he was incompetent to stand trial and another

Summary: The Criminal Justice Subcommittee considered a long agenda of criminal justice, public safety, and related bills. Early measures included HB 1171, tolling the statute of limitations for failure to make mandatory child abuse reports, and HB 1403, expanding school safety provisions by allowing child care facilities in the guardian program and clarifying perimeter and door-security rules; both passed unanimously, with HB 1403 adopted as amended. The committee also approved HB 1099, giving law enforcement discretion in arrests involving elderly or medically vulnerable individuals in facilities; HB 1121, strengthening restrictions on misuse of unmanned aircraft systems; HB 1525, creating penalties for impersonating rideshare drivers and clarifying transportation-disadvantaged access; and PCS for HB 687, increasing penalties for repeat DUI/vehicular homicide offenses known as “Trenton’s Law.” Members then advanced HB 847 to create an FDLE grant program for expedited DNA testing, PCS for HB 757 to prohibit altered sexual depictions of identifiable persons and create a civil remedy, and HB 1415 to repeal an obsolete Broward County narcotics enforcement unit. The committee also heard and approved HB 1207, the Tristan Murphy Act, which expands mental health diversion grants, creates a model diversion process, and establishes a behavioral healthcare data repository; testimony from the bill’s namesake’s mother and law enforcement emphasized the need for treatment over incarceration. HB 1351 updated sexual offender/predator registration rules, and HB 1479 created a public records exemption for domestic violence lethality assessment forms; both passed without opposition. Later, the committee approved PCS for HB 1283, making sex trafficking of children under 12 or mentally incapacitated persons a capital felony, despite constitutional concerns raised in debate; the bill passed 13-2. PCS for HB 781, addressing cyber intimidation by publication (doxing), also passed unanimously after supporters described it as a needed tool against online harassment. Finally, CSHB 139 authorized pawnbrokers to use digital transaction forms, and PCS for HB 107 created and enhanced penalties for fraudulent use of gift cards. Most bills were reported favorably, many unanimously, and several were amended before passage.

Transcript Highlights:

• And where is the judicial discretion in that situation? >> It doesn't mandate.
• The court with an Inter preliminary injunction hearing would be held and determine whether that preliminary
• But once the hearing is held, then the court will make the determination whether to continue that injunction
• And that would help determine the technical requirements and provide the scope of work timeline, the
• penalties, but the way that we've written that section in the bill toward the end says that it would be determined

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• AB 2235, the Judicial Home Security Act, allows judges to use an alternate mailing address in public
• It would create a judicial home security act to allow judges to identify themselves and their family
• The bill is designed to help rights holders determine whether their works were used to train AI models
• The printer itself does not have access to original geometry, so it cannot determine whether a part it
• After determining there was sufficient evidence of cockfighting activity, including the manufacture of

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• back in the legislation itself, the bill before you now creates a public and transparent process to determine
• We've determined that over the next several years, we'll be spending over $20 million for PFAS treatment
• We've determined over the next several years, we'll be able to be able to be. are not immune to these
• We determined over the next several years, we'll be spending over $20 million for PFOS treatment.
• Supreme Court determined that state laws, including Massachusetts Burma law, would be preempted because

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee hearing focused on a broad set of climate, energy, and environmental justice proposals. Early testimony strongly supported the Climate Change Superfund or “Polluter Pays” bill (H.1014/S.58), which would assess the largest fossil fuel emitters for a one-time fee based on historic emissions to fund climate adaptation. Sponsors argued the bill is modeled on Superfund cleanup principles, would target only the largest multinational polluters, would not be passed on to consumers, and would direct a significant share of funds to environmental justice communities. Committee members asked about the number of companies covered, consumer impacts, and whether the bill would address other forms of environmental destruction; sponsors said it was limited to major fossil fuel companies with a Massachusetts footprint and did not cover other pollution sources. The committee also heard testimony on a fusion energy compact proposal (S.673) that would direct the administration to develop a framework for a New England regional compact to accelerate fusion research, workforce development, and supply-chain growth. Supporters from MIT and the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities said fusion could become a major clean-energy and economic opportunity, but acknowledged the technology is not yet commercially viable and still has unresolved technical, cost, and waste-management questions. Members pressed on environmental impacts, siting, waste, costs, and whether the bill would create a compact or only a framework; sponsors said it would only create the framework and that the administration would need to negotiate with other states. Another major topic was a pilot program for nature-based climate solutions (H.971/S.??), backed by legislators, Boston Harbor Now, and UMass Boston’s Stone Living Lab. Witnesses said the bill would help speed permits for research and demonstration projects such as living shorelines, marsh restoration, and hybrid “green-to-gray” flood protections, while maintaining safeguards and protecting Indigenous and historic resources. Committee members asked how the proposal would interact with other permitting reforms and whether it could conflict with housing or wetland-related streamlining; supporters said it was complementary and aimed at making projects faster, more affordable, and more data-driven. The hearing also covered climate-safe buildings and climate adaptation funding bills. Supporters of H.1004/S.583 said current building codes do not adequately account for future flooding, heat, and wind, and the bill would add climate expertise to the building board, allow stretch resilience codes, expand floodplain standards, and create a retrofit program. Related testimony backed H.938/S.572, which would create a dedicated climate and community resilience fund financed by a small fee on property insurance premiums; advocates said it would provide stable long-term revenue for adaptation, especially in environmental justice communities, and help replace unreliable federal funding. One witness from CLF supported the climate-safe buildings and funding bills but opposed S.560/H.939 as too broad. The committee also heard testimony on airport air-quality legislation (H.997) calling for more monitoring and mitigation of ultra-fine particulate pollution around Logan Airport and Massport communities. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• because we use that to determine a safety record.' stuff and on the workers compensation stuff and on
• because we use that to help determine because we use that to determine<01:26:25.120> a<01:26:
• determine a safety record." determine a safety record."
• <01:31:22.680> system<01:31:23.080> in<01:31:23.240> reviewing the judicial
• system in reviewing the judicial system in reviewing workers'<01:31:24.200> comp<01:31:24.480>

Keywords: 916, all

Summary: The committee opened by taking roll for the Joint Transportation, Highways, and Military Affairs Committee and noting that 20 topics had been submitted for discussion, including one late addition. Members were asked to number the topics for reference, and the chair explained that each presenter should give a brief overview before the committee returned to the dais for questions and possible ranking or action. No votes were taken during the portion provided. The first topic was a request from the Associated General Contractors of Wyoming to have TRIP, a third-party transportation research organization, present a report on Wyoming’s highway system. The report is intended to identify transportation needs and 25 priority projects, and the committee generally supported hearing the report and methodology directly from TRIP. The next topic combined two similar railroad safety proposals. Representative Chestek described a bill addressing train length, wayside detectors, and track inspections, citing the East Palestine derailment and concerns about reduced inspection frequency. Committee members raised questions about federal preemption and enforcement authority; Chestek said states can be more protective of safety where federal rules leave gaps, and WYDOT said it would need additional expertise and staffing to administer such a program. No public testimony was offered on the railroad topic. The committee then heard two proposals from the Wyoming Military Department. One would study Tricare subsidies for mental health providers by comparing Tricare reimbursement rates with other insurers, gathering de-identified data on eligible members and provider participation, and then returning to the committee with findings before any legislative recommendation. Members discussed whether the issue might fit better in Labor, Health, and Social Services, but the military department said it believed the committee had a strong connection to the topic. The second military topic would study Service Group Life Insurance for state active duty, comparing state and federal death benefits for Guard members to identify any shortfalls. The committee also briefly discussed a VSO program review raised by Representative Neff, focusing on the number of veterans service officers and retention, but no action was taken in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Our financial crimes investigations involve unemployment insurance, Social Security disability determination
• Our financial crimes investigations involve unemployment insurance, Social Security disability determination
• /c><00:34:50.040> a cases will be they're like under a cases will be they're like under a Judicial
• 51.960> that's<00:34:52.440> like<00:34:52.599> not<00:34:52.760> an Judicial
• body that's like not an Judicial body that's like not an appointed<00:34:53.560> kind<00:34:53.679

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It prohibits unauthorized access to voting systems, voting machines, or voter data without lawful judicial
• Assembly Bill 2235 by Assembly Member Pacheco and others, an act relating to the confidentiality of judicial
• Assembly Bill 2235 by Assembly Member Pacheco and others, an act relating to the confidentiality of judicial
• AB 2235, the Judicial Home Security Act, allows judges to use an alternate mailing address in public

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then an additional item for the Second Judicial District Court on juvenile drug courts.
• On line number nine, you can see down there a million dollars in the Second Judicial District Court for
• On line number nine, you can see down there a million dollars in the Second Judicial District Court for
• And then moving on to page two, $2 million for the Second Judicial District Attorney's Office related

Bills: SB193, SB132, SB35, SB145

Keywords: SB193, acequia, community ditch, irrigation works construction fund, water infrastructure, ditch infrastructure, irrigation, New Mexico water law, agricultural water, farmers, Rio Grande, acequia association, forest land protection revolving fund, state fund transfer, irrigation projects, SB132, DOIT, Department of Information Technology, software replacement, equipment replacement

Transcript Highlights:

• for all denials, and that only fosters inherent consistency, transparency, and public trust in a judicial
• Chair and members, House Bill 1765 limits the use of no-knock warrants by requiring higher judicial review
• You need judicial authority of a judge who's actually a lawyer unless it's a really small town.
• You need judicial authority of a judge who's actually a lawyer unless it's a really small reserve for

Bills: HB115

Keywords: public funds, lobbying, political subdivision, government spending, transparency, HB 115, taxpayer-funded lobbying, local government lobbying, county association dues, municipal lobbying, lobbyist registration, Chapter 305, Government Code Section 556.0056, Local Government Code Section 89.002, county government, city government, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, state association of counties, sheriffs association

Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• That being the case, the bill provides that we, the legislature, make the determination that providing
• into a discretionary, judicially into a discretionary, judicially uninforcable,<01:52:34.560>
• necessary step in undoing wrongful necessary step in undoing wrongful judiciary<01:54:16.800> judicial
• <01:54:17.440> overreach<01:54:18.159> in<01:54:18.480> the judiciary judicial
• overreach in the judiciary judicial overreach in the past?

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:18:16.080> contributions<00:18:16.720> to actuarial determined contributions to
• actuarial determined contributions to the<00:18:17.120> teachers<00:18:17.600> retirement<
• that's the last of our summaries, but I will do a little foreshadowing of whenever we take up the judicial
• As indicated, this is the branch budget bill for the judicial branch.
• Um much like much the judicial branch.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The meeting opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, then moved into committee and floor reports. Several measures received favorable committee reports and were ordered to first reading and placed on the calendar, including Current Resolution 9, Senate Joint Resolution 23, House Bill 145, House Bill 567, and House Bill 506 with House Committee Substitute 1. The chamber also noted that House Bills 500 and 504 had already received two readings and were sent to the Rules Committee before House Bill 500 was brought up for final consideration. Most of the discussion focused on House Bill 500, the executive branch budget bill. Members described it as a “good first draft” and emphasized a budget process they said was more transparent than in prior years. The bill was presented as a restrained two-year operating budget with spending growth kept at a little under 2% annually, while setting aside about 2% of projected revenues, or roughly $614 million, in the Budget Reserve Trust Fund for future needs. The budget also used base reductions in some areas while exempting others such as Medicaid benefits, SEEK, corrections, behavioral health, and veterans programs. Subcommittee chairs then outlined major spending areas. Education provisions included a 2% annual increase in base SEEK funding, transportation funding held flat, equalization for recallable nickel funding, continued retirement contributions, and major support for postsecondary access, dual credit, asset preservation, and workforce training. Health and family services provisions held Medicaid steady while adding waiver slots, behavioral health and substance use support, public health investments, and funding for rural health and laboratory capacity. Other sections covered personnel and pensions, veterans services, infrastructure, public safety, economic development, tourism, and environmental projects. The only recorded action on the floor was adoption of House Committee Substitute 1 to House Bill 500, followed by a motion for final passage of the bill as amended. The transcript ends as discussion on final passage begins, before any final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• Training costs are determined locally.
• Would they be able to determine who is the good person with the gun and who is the bad person with the
• The noncompliance, the state board has to determine that.
• So there is a process by which that is determined, isn't it?
• I don't know if that counts as a judicial process.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• our state agencies and those spaces know the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial
• our state agencies and those spaces know the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial
• our state agencies and those spaces know the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial
• our state agencies and those spaces know the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial
• warrant and has warrant and a judicial warrant and has proper<00:26:12.559> protections<00:26

Bills: HB1577, HB1870

Keywords: Smart911, 911, 911 Board, emergency response, public safety answering point, PSAP, next-generation 911, NG911, dispatch, dispatcher, emergency profile, safety profile, medical information, disability access, access needs, functional needs, kupuna, aging, developmental disabilities, communication access

Summary: The committee reconvened on March 19, 2026, for decision-making on measures heard earlier in the week. It first took up HB 812 on agriculture, agreeing to move it forward with amendments and a Senate draft, and then HB 2388 on public notice, which was also passed with amendments after concerns about transparency and the need for local newspaper notice on Maui were discussed. HB 1414 on procurement and HB 2469 on a regular session review working group were both deferred to March 24 for further work with the author, while HB 322 on voter registration was deferred indefinitely in favor of a Senate vehicle. The committee then heard HB 1577, which would create a statewide emergency safety profile system pilot program and working group for 911. Testimony from disability advocates, emergency medical services, and others strongly supported the bill, emphasizing benefits for people without smartphones, better sharing of medical and emergency information, and improved response in the field. Committee members and witnesses discussed whether the 911 Board already had the authority to implement the system without legislation, and the bill was not immediately acted on in the portion of the transcript provided. The final major item was HB 1870 on protected community locations. Testimony in support came from the University of Hawaii, the Legal Clinic, immigrant-rights groups, public health advocates, and many individuals, while the Department of Education supported the measure but requested clarity on federal compliance and raised concerns about a 1,000-foot perimeter beyond campus. Supporters said the bill would protect sensitive locations and help immigrant families feel safe accessing schools, health care, and other services. No final vote on HB 1870 is shown in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• And my question was, okay, how do we determine the fitness of firemen?
• the fitness of okay, how do we determine the fitness of firemen?
• whether people are under the determine whether people are under the influence<01:47:19.840> while
• that um the the uh with the judicial that um the the uh with the judicial discretion<02:25:18.080
• Circumstances which may be considered in determining whether such alarm is warranted include, but are

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I've studied the information at hand, listened to both sides, and I am determining that the point of
• that the sides, and I am determining that the point<00:29:39.520> of<00:29:39.679> order
• <01:19:39.679> from received a bonafide determination from received a bonafide determination
• what we're going to we're determining what we're going to put<02:04:36.400> in<02:04:36.639><
• Glad you brought up the judicial thing because I had written it on my notes and forgot to mention it.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Exemption from the Appropriations Limited to Revenue Collections for the Judicial Branch Certification
• Administratively attached to OCA, the Judicial Branch Certification Commission oversees certification

Keywords: 1184, house, all