Transcript Highlights:

• to allow provision of collaboration to allow provision of services<01:04:37.760> related<01:04
• State panel will collaborate with local teams on certain cases while the local teams will independently
• The joint review process will involve a collaboration between the state child mortality review panel
• DCYF will also be collaborating with the Children's Justice Initiative to have training available to
• <01:37:51.360> with<01:37:51.520> the DCYF will also be collaborating with the DCYF

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• How are students growing as collaborators, problem solvers?
• have done a profile of a learner that talk about the competencies as it relates to, um, maybe collaboration
• So, that was one of our recommendations, is that the KDE collaborate with the Kentucky Center for School
• > the<01:36:53.480> Kentucky<01:36:53.880> Center<01:36:54.120> for collaborate
• with the Kentucky Center for collaborate with the Kentucky Center for School<01:36:54.520> Safety

Keywords: 0:00:03 - Call to Order and Roll Call 0:00:43 - Approval of October 14, 2025 and November 4, 2025 Minutes 0:01:15 - Acceptance of Office of Education Accountability Report: Analysis Of Student Discipline Data in Kentucky Schools 0:02:10 - Implementation Update on 26 RS HB 257 0:49:38 - Career and Technical Education in the Assessment and Accountability System 1:13:50 - Office of Education Accountability Annual Report 1:47:27 – Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The Education Assessment & Accountability Review Subcommittee approved the minutes from its October 14 and November 4 meetings and also approved the Office of Education Accountability report analyzing student discipline data in Kentucky schools. The main presentation came from KDE Commissioner Dr. Robby Fletcher on implementation of House Bill 257, which he said has two major parts: selection of a statewide college entrance exam through a new procurement process, and development of locally designed indicators of quality for accountability. On the college exam, Fletcher explained that the state had to reopen procurement after Senate Bill 197, with the RFP released May 21, vendor questions handled through the Finance and Administration Cabinet, proposals due June 22, and scoring and review expected in July and August, with a vendor decision not likely until October. He emphasized that the exam is a norm-referenced college-readiness measure, not a test of Kentucky academic standards, which are assessed by the KSA. Members asked about the science requirement in statute, the possibility of multiple vendors or district choice, and whether the CLT could participate; Fletcher said vendors must address science in the RFP, multiple vendors could be possible, and any vendor could submit a proposal if it meets the rubric. He also noted that ACT and SAT differ in structure, that either can meet college-readiness benchmarks, and that there were no major complaints about the SAT during its first year of use. The second major topic was the locally developed indicators of quality under House Bill 257. Fletcher said these are intended to let districts measure themselves against their own goals rather than compare districts statewide, while still aligning with Kentucky standards. He described examples such as achievement, growth, student well-being, safety, fiscal responsibility, civics, internships, apprenticeships, project-based learning, and defenses of learning. He said districts may use local assessments such as MAP, STAR, and I-Ready alongside state data, and that local models should be developed with families, community members, and workforce partners. He added that KDE is providing technical assistance, has applied for a federal CGSA grant, and will use a one-time $15,000 cost offset for districts implementing local accountability models, with a superintendent webcast planned for August.

Transcript Highlights:

• Because of the collaborative work of our two committees, the provision has been taken out of the bill
• I'll just add, I just want to reinforce that this has been a very collaborative process between our two
• reinforce that this has been<00:02:44.400> a<00:02:44.640> very<00:02:44.879> collaborative
• <00:02:45.519> process been a very collaborative process been a very collaborative process
• with them um on to collaborate with them um on understanding<01:26:34.880> the<01:26:35.199><

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We are looking for collaboration.
• We are looking for collaboration.
• We are welcome, and the door is open for collaboration.
• We need collaboration. We need to be.
• We need collaboration. We need to have those conversations.

Summary: The committee heard several bills, with most of the discussion focused on public safety, consumer protection, and youth harms. AB 1557 by Assemblymember Papin would clarify e-bike motor power limits and set lower speed-related standards for Class 1 and 2 e-bikes. Supporters, including the California Police Chiefs Association, cities, the California Medical Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, argued the bill would reduce severe injuries and deaths among young riders. Opponents from People for Bikes warned it could conflict with federal law, create legal uncertainty, and disrupt the bicycle market. The author and committee members acknowledged industry concerns and urged continued work on the bill. AB 1770 by Assemblymember Garcia would place large health care service plan arbitration under California Department of Justice oversight and require compliance with the California Arbitration Act. Supporters described cases where patients were forced into private arbitration with little transparency or accountability, arguing the bill would make the process fairer and more neutral. Kaiser Permanente and the Civil Justice Association of California said they were still reviewing amendments and had not settled on a final position. Committee members expressed sympathy for the personal stories shared and encouraged continued negotiations. The committee also heard AB 2075, which would require fire suppression equipment to be kept closer at hand during brush work, and AB 1864, which would require screening of gene synthesis orders to prevent misuse for bioterrorism. AB 2075 was presented as a response to a Ventura County wildfire, with support from the Ventura County District Attorney’s office and no opposition heard. AB 1864 was backed by the author, Stanford biosecurity expert Dr. Milana Trout, and Encode AI, while Biocom opposed unless amended and California Life Sciences remained neutral. Members discussed implementation details and the role of the Department of Public Health. A major portion of the hearing was devoted to AB 1709, which would set a minimum age of 16 for social media accounts on platforms with harmful features and create an e-safety advisory commission. Supporters, including youth advocates, parents, medical groups, and Common Sense Media, said addictive design features are harming children’s mental health and safety. Opponents, including EFF, the ACLU, TechNet, and other civil liberties and industry groups, argued the bill is overbroad, raises First Amendment and privacy concerns, and could limit access to important online communities. Despite those objections, the bill was moved forward after committee discussion, with members emphasizing the need to protect children while continuing to work on carveouts and implementation details.

Transcript Highlights:

• Department of Transportation and particularly Melissa Schultz uh who has worked very hard and collaboratively
• 00:03:37.920> very<00:03:38.159> hard<00:03:38.400> and<00:03:38.640> collaboratively
• worked very hard and collaboratively worked very hard and collaboratively with<00:03:39.680>
• with DPS that one would collaboration with DPS that one would not<00:21:53.840> expire<00:21:
• So, I guess I'm just trying to understand when that passover happens and what that collaboration is,

Bills: HF3169, HF3749, HF2605, HF3541, HF4102, HF3513, HF268

Keywords: suicide prevention, transportation, mental health, bridge safety, data collection, state law, bridge inspection, active transportation, truck parking, public safety, vehicle registration, fee structure, full-service providers, Capitol security, emergency management, state buildings, law enforcement, Minnesota State Patrol, State Patrol compensation, trooper salary

Transcript Highlights:

• So, the collaboration between guardianship and APS. We work collaboratively.
• So, the collaboration between a Okay.
• So, the collaboration between a guardianship<00:40:34.560> and<00:40:34.720> APS.
• c><00:40:38.160> cases,<00:40:38.560> but collaboratively.
• Many of our cases, but collaboratively.

Keywords: 1. Call to Order and Roll Call – 00:00:24 2. Discussion of The Center for Courageous Kids – 00:02:46 3. Discussion of Adult Protective Services and State Guardianship Programs – 00:25:22 4. Discussion of Annual Report of the External Child Fatality and Near Fatality Review Panel – 01:00:34 5. Consideration of Referred Administrative Regulations – 01:33:41 6. Adjournment – 01:42:07, 958, all

Summary: The committee’s first interim meeting opened with roll call and a reminder that Kentucky had 8,641 children in out-of-home care with active placements as of June 1, 2025. The first presentation was from the Center for Courageous Kids (CCK), a donor-funded camp in Scottsville that serves children with lifelong illnesses and disabilities at no charge. Representatives described the camp’s history, its year-round family retreats and summer sessions, its medical and accessibility supports, and its impact on campers’ confidence and independence. They said CCK has served more than 43,000 campers from 46 states and 13 countries, including 22,000 from Kentucky, and noted plans to reach all 120 Kentucky counties. CCK also outlined future capital needs: a new art barn and a medical lodge. The organization said the art barn project would cost $2.5 million, with a legislative request of $1.5 million, and the medical lodge would cost $2.875 million, with a legislative request of $1.75 million. Members responded very positively, with several praising the camp’s work and one member asking about operational challenges. CCK said its main challenges are awareness, staff and volunteer recruitment, and expanding medical and housing capacity; it also said it is accredited by the American Camp Association and receives health and safety visits and audits. The committee then moved to a presentation on adult protective services and state guardianship programs from Jessica Wayne and Cliff Bryant of DCBS. They explained the legal framework for guardianship, the difference between full and limited guardianship/conservatorship, emergency appointments, and the state’s role as a last-resort guardian when no family member or private entity is available. They reported 4,464 individuals under state guardianship as of June 1, with most cases involving dementia, developmental disability, intellectual disability, nursing home or long-term care placement, severe mental illness, or brain injury. They also said the division has 89 field workers across 14 regional offices, with an average caseload of 52 and a goal of reducing that into the mid-40s through additional hiring.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:42:21.920> on worked side by side, collaboratively on worked side by side, collaboratively
• want to thank Senator Housechild for the great work on this bill and all the stakeholders that collaborated
• <01:20:53.280> Um collaborated to get to where we are.
• Um collaborated to get to where we are.
• Um, this has really been a collaborative effort.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > as<00:11:54.640> I<00:11:54.800> said product of collaboration as I said product
• of collaboration as I said between<00:11:55.279> the<00:11:55.519> sponsors<00:11:56.079
• And it turned into a wildly successful collaboration of technical people and interested New Hampshire
• But they surprised me by their willingness to collaborate and, in particular, to let stakeholders, not
• But they surprised me by their willingness to collaborate and, in particular, to let stakeholders, not

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There have been a lot of collaborations from school districts, literacy leads, superintendents, and other
• So, what I'm bringing you is kind of the collaborated and agreed-upon proposal from a lot of different
• They collaborate with families, teachers, specialists, anyone who can help their students find success
• Transportation has long been an area of collaboration, and this funding cut would create unnecessary
• and creatively to build collaboratively and creatively to build things<01:31:11.199> that<01:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• For Senator Champion, the bill is written as a grant to the Birth Justice Collaborative.
• Um, but I think that it's a different time to find more collaboration, which I think that the seven counties
• which I think that the collaboration which I think that the seven<00:15:23.040> counties<00:15
• Um, and we worked on this, uh, in collaboration with the department.
• collaboration with, uh, the department. collaboration with, uh, the department.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• was developed through a collaborative was developed through a collaborative lengthy<00:55:49.200
• Nowhere in there does it talk about a collaborative effort.
• Um, but it's a collaborative educational program.
• Um but it's a collaborative extension.
• Um but it's a collaborative um<02:01:22.159> educational<02:01:22.880> program.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• House File 2143 is rooted in community voices um and is shaped by collaboration.
• House File 2143 is rooted in community voices um and is shaped by collaboration.
• House File 2143 is rooted in community voices um and is shaped by collaboration.
• House File 2143 is rooted in community voices um and is shaped by collaboration.
• House File 2143 is rooted in community voices um and is shaped by collaboration.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:45:24.359> process<00:45:25.240> uh<00:45:25.359> in<00:45:25.559> collaboration
• developing a process uh in collaboration developing a process uh in collaboration with<00:45:26.440
• Next, we have Jeff Mikulina, Hawaii Executive Collaborative Climate Hawaii, in support, on Zoom, not
• Next, we have Jeff Mikulina, Hawaii Executive Collaborative Climate Hawaii, in support, on Zoom, not
• climate Hawaii in support collaborative climate Hawaii in support on<00:56:55.000> Zoom<00:56

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Energy and Environmental Protection heard testimony on Senate Bill 897, which would create a Wildlife Liability Trust Fund within DCCA for administrative purposes. The chair opened by noting the hearing had to end by noon because of floor session, and that written testimony would be considered if not all witnesses could speak. Testimony included support from DCCA, the Attorney General’s office, the Public Utilities Commission, Charter Communications, Ulupono Initiative, AES Hawaii, Hawaiian Electric, Clearway Energy Group, Kauai Island Utility Cooperative, Hawaiian Telcom, and IBW Local 1260, with opposition or concerns from the Hawaii Association for Justice and some others. Hawaiian Electric strongly supported the bill and asked for amendments, saying the fund would help address wildfire liability, protect customers and the economy, and support restoration of investment-grade credit; it also proposed a larger shareholder contribution and said the bill was part of a broader effort to raise settlement funds and improve grid safety and resiliency. Committee members focused heavily on whether the bill would actually lower costs for ratepayers and improve credit ratings. DCCA said there was a nexus between limiting liability, creating a sufficiently large wildfire fund, and transparent mitigation requirements, but acknowledged there was no guarantee of a credit-rating improvement or precise estimate of rate impacts. Members questioned Hawaiian Electric about the assumptions in its cost comparisons, the 30-year securitization structure, and whether funding could be shifted later to shareholders after credit was restored. Hawaiian Electric responded that the bill assumes the fund is paid through securitization, that removing that presumption could undermine the credit-rating benefit, and that its models suggest credit-spread savings could offset the customer charge over time; it also said it would follow up with additional analysis. The company and Ulupono both described the measure as a difficult but potentially necessary way to socialize wildfire risk and avoid a larger crisis later. The Hawaii Association for Justice opposed the bill’s liability caps and raised concerns about consumer rights, oversight discretion, statute-of-limitations changes, and evidence rules. Hawaiian Telcom suggested amendments to clarify compliance with FCC pole-attachment agreements. No vote or final action was taken during the portion of the hearing provided, and members indicated they wanted more analysis before being comfortable with the bill’s long-term ratepayer impacts.

Transcript Highlights:

• > become<00:32:05.080> available<00:32:05.480> to<00:32:05.639> study collaboration
• become available to study collaboration become available to study improve<00:32:06.519> and<00
• <00:32:13.960> opportunities<00:32:14.519> often collaborative opportunities often collaborative
• <00:32:35.559> Department<00:32:36.440> Personnel<00:32:36.880> are collaboration
• Department Personnel are collaboration Department Personnel are here<00:32:37.880> uh<00:32:37.960

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Wilma Franco from the SELA Collaborative, the Southeast L.A. Collaborative.
• Collaborative.
• Woma Franco, and I'm the executive director of the Southeast LA Collaborative.
• SB 1022 builds on existing efforts to create structure for collaboration.
• I appreciate the committee's collaboration with us.

Summary: The committee heard several public safety bills and took testimony on each, with members often noting amendments and continuing negotiations. SB 1009 by Senator Becker would require juvenile courts to find that less restrictive alternatives are unsuitable before ordering detention, and would require periodic review of continued detention and consideration of alternatives at disposition. Supporters argued it would reduce unnecessary youth detention and improve transparency; probation, judges, and police groups opposed it as an undue limit on judicial discretion and potentially unsafe in serious cases. The chair said he would recommend an aye with amendments, but the bill was held pending quorum and later remained on call. SB 1130 by Senator Gomez Reyes would update privacy law for wearable recording devices such as smart glasses, requiring consent before recording in places where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy and banning devices or accessories designed to defeat recording indicators. Supporters said the bill addresses secret recording and invasive surveillance; opponents from tech and hospitality groups sought clarification to avoid unintended liability for businesses and exempt workplace communication devices. Members discussed those exemptions, and the chair recommended an aye, but the measure also remained on call. Senator Blake Spear presented SB 99, which would let courts consider military protective orders in domestic violence proceedings and require better communication between civilian law enforcement and military authorities. Supporters from the Department of Defense, local officials, and military representatives said it would close protection gaps for military families; the ACLU opposed it on due process grounds because MPOs are issued without judicial process. The chair and author emphasized that the bill only allows consideration of MPOs and does not require civilian enforcement of them. The bill passed out on a vote, though it remained on call for additional members. The committee also heard SB 937 by Senator Gonzalez, restricting flashbang use for crowd control and banning flashbangs and explosive breaching charges in immigration enforcement, and SB 1022, creating a statewide anti-trafficking task force. SB 937 drew support from civil rights and community groups and opposition from police and sheriffs over the use-of-force standard and limits on tactics; it passed out on a vote but remained on call. SB 1022 was supported by survivor and faith groups and opposed by public defenders and sex worker advocates who raised concerns about racial disparities and enforcement harms; it also passed out on a vote. Later, SB 1395, extending criminal protective orders for certain felony sex offenses against minors up to 20 years, and SB 1230, increasing penalties for repeat illegal dumping, were both heard with mixed testimony and were held on call after committee votes. The committee also adopted a consent calendar and several bills were moved forward with amendments.

Transcript Highlights:

• development of a proof of concept with the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds, exploring how we can collaborate
• At VINFEN, we established a learning collaborative where our Tech Connect digital navigators from across
• These learning collaboratives are led by the digital navigators and provide an invaluable way to help
• These learning collaboratives are led by the digital navigators and provide an invaluable way to help
• Continued investment and collaboration are essential to ensure that no one is left behind in our increasingly

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee held its second hearing on a large docket of technology, internet, cybersecurity, broadband, and media bills. Early testimony focused on community media funding legislation, with lawmakers and local access advocates arguing that as cable subscriptions decline and streaming grows, revenue tied to cable franchises no longer supports community television and PEG programming. Supporters said community media remains a key source of local news, government meeting coverage, and civic transparency as newspapers disappear or consolidate. A related bill on cable contract oversight also drew support, with testimony that the Department of Telecommunications and Cable is backlogged and should more actively review municipal-provider agreements and report its workload to the committee. Another major topic was a proposal to create a Massachusetts Innovation Fund for state IT modernization. The Alliance for Digital Innovation backed the bill, saying agencies need flexible upfront capital to replace outdated systems and improve cybersecurity, and pointing to the federal Technology Modernization Fund as a model. The witness noted that funding for the state program still needs to be identified. The committee also heard strong support for a bill requiring free broadband in public housing, with Rep. Emmela Goodwin and MAPC describing internet access as essential for jobs, school, telehealth, and civic participation. They said the digital divide in Massachusetts is driven largely by affordability rather than infrastructure, though questions were raised about costs, wiring, and whether all housing sites already have broadband access available at the curb. A substantial portion of the hearing centered on bills to limit addictive social media feeds for minors. Supporters, including lawmakers, parents, teens, and advocacy groups, argued that algorithmic feeds contribute to addiction, anxiety, body image problems, and other harms, and said the bills would restrict surveillance-based curation and overnight notifications while leaving search and followed accounts available. Opponents, including FIRE, CCIA, and the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, argued the bills would require invasive age verification, threaten privacy and cybersecurity, burden adults’ anonymity, and likely face First Amendment challenges. They also warned the measures could disadvantage smaller businesses and may be unconstitutional based on recent court rulings in other states. The committee also heard support for blockchain-related bills creating a commission, a pilot program, and consumer education efforts, with testimony that Massachusetts has the talent but needs a coordinated state strategy. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• community organizations to better understand Louisiana's most pressing challenges and to work collaboratively
• system and hospital leaders statewide, insurance providers, clinics, small providers, as well as collaboration
• As a long-term care provider in our state and in collaboration with the Louisiana Hospital Association
• Louisiana School Nurses Organization in the Louisiana Department of Education collaborated to establish
• urge and request the Louisiana Department of Health and the State Department of Education, in collaboration

Summary: The committee heard a personal privilege update on HB 1227, which Representative DeWitt said would return next week as a proposed HCR for a two-year study of the three-doctor panel after discussions with Dr. Nia Colotta. Better Louisiana also presented its new Leadership Louisiana Health Fellows Program, describing it as a data-driven leadership initiative focused on health care workforce, rural access, chronic disease, and other system issues; members discussed whether the program could also help generate policy research, including on managed care organizations. The committee then considered SB 427 on anatomical gifts. After adopting technical amendments, Senator Presley and Dr. Jeff White explained that the bill would strengthen organ donation law by creating a decision registry that records both yes and no choices, clarifying the legal effect of refusal, and codifying ethical principles such as the dead donor rule. Questions focused on organ viability, registry procedures, minors, and a Monroe case involving a disputed donor designation. Supporters included LOPA and the Louisiana Conference of Catholic Bishops, and the bill was reported favorably. HB 946, dealing with hospital price transparency and compliance with federal pricing rules, drew extensive testimony. Representative Landry and a witness from Patient Rights Advocate described it as a consumer transparency measure, but the Louisiana Hospital Association opposed the bill’s state-level enforcement and debt-collection provisions. Landry offered an amendment removing the debt-collection and affirmative-defense language, but after debate the substitute failed on a 5-6 vote and the bill was voluntarily deferred. The committee also reported favorably on SB 109, which revises membership qualifications for the Louisiana Emergency Medical Services Commission; SCR 20, urging federal flexibility on Medicaid redetermination for elderly and disabled beneficiaries; SB 216, allowing coroners to rely on licensed practical nurses for medical pronouncements of death; and SB 45, exempting certain gratuitous hospice houses from licensure, with testimony from hospice house operators and supporters. Finally, HCR 71 by Representative Chasson sought an LDH study of how Louisiana’s law and guidance on pregnancy-related emergency medications is working in hospitals, urgent care, and retail settings. Supporters said providers are hesitant to use medications such as misoprostol because of stigma and uncertainty, while opponents from Louisiana Right to Life argued the resolution was unnecessary and could create controversy. The discussion centered on whether the study should be narrowed or made more objective, but no final action on the resolution was reached in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• They're always very informed and always willing to be collaborative, so thank you.
• But I'm glad that you all are willing to be collaborative in nature to ensure that we have trailer language
• And our vision is to hit the ground running on July 1st with a very collaborative and transparent effort
• This Proposition 4 is something that there should be more advanced collaboration on because, again, it
• Yeah, and I can't speak to the other agencies, but we have close collaboration in particular with the

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• research grants, and in those research grants, um, you would look at the minimum of two universities collaborating
• court, but in the realm of academics and research, research, um, I think it is better that they collaborate
• that<00:02:03.720> they I think it is better that they I think it is better that they collaborate
• 05.080> together<00:02:05.520> than<00:02:05.760> it<00:02:05.920> is collaborate
• and work together than it is collaborate and work together than it is to<00:02:06.280> be<00:

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:10 SB 6 Discussion 00:40 SB 6 Vote 00:13:30 Cochlear Implants 00:16:25, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Appropriations and Revenue Committee heard Senate Bill 6, sponsored by Senate President Robert Stivers, which would create an endowed research fund to support collaborative university research in Kentucky. Stivers described the bill as an extension of earlier higher-education research efforts, arguing that Kentucky should build research “hubs” by requiring or encouraging partnerships among universities and outside entities, with potential focus areas including health care, engineering, aerospace, agriculture, and other emerging fields. He said the proposal would establish five research tranches over five years and sought a $30 million endowment for each, generating annual interest to fund consortium-based research and leverage additional private and federal dollars. Senators Frommeyer, Neal, Givens, Boswell, and Richardson spoke in support, emphasizing economic development, job creation, and examples from other research clusters such as Boston and North Carolina’s Research Triangle. The committee voted 12-0 to report the bill favorably to the Senate floor. The committee then received a presentation from Dr. Matthew Bush of the University of Kentucky on pediatric hearing loss and cochlear implants. Bush explained that early hearing detection and intervention is critical because hearing loss in newborns is a neurocognitive emergency that affects language, literacy, and long-term outcomes. He outlined national screening benchmarks, Kentucky’s incidence of childhood hearing loss, and the high educational and societal costs of untreated hearing loss. Bush also highlighted disparities in rural and western Kentucky, where children face delayed diagnosis, longer waits for hearing aids or cochlear implants, and more difficulty accessing follow-up care. He described cochlear implants, the multidisciplinary care they require, and research showing improved language development, quality of life, and cost savings when children are treated early.

Transcript Highlights:

• all three systems had integrated, manually activated panic alarm systems that established direct collaboration
• Our collaborative focus in Cochise County was interoperability first, preparedness, prevention, and recovery
• And the only way we did this is because of the collaboration that we have already between... ...and the
• only way we did this is because of the collaboration that we have already between ourselves and the
• So everybody bought in because it was a big collaborative effort.

Keywords: 1182, all