Transcript Highlights:

• It had to be approved by the local governing body, and they would still have to follow all building codes
• It had to be approved by the local governing body, and they would still have to follow all building codes
• It had to be approved by the local governing body, and they would still have to follow all building codes
• It had to be approved by the local governing body, and they would still have to follow all building codes
• It had to be approved by the local governing body, and they would still have to follow all building codes

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00 Roll Call 00:27 SB 76 Discussion 01:20 SB 76 Vote 04:51 SB 59 Discussion 05:50 SB 59 Vote 20:49 SB 313 Discussion 23:46 SB 313 Vote 28:18, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Economic Development, Tourism, and Labor met and first took up Senate Bill 76, sponsored by Senator Greg Elkins. The bill would raise the construction retainage/escrow statute threshold from $500,000 to $2 million to reflect inflation, and would also make any contract term waiving the escrow protection void and unenforceable. Elkins said the measure would not apply to government contracts and was intended to protect contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers from delayed payment. The committee voted 9-0 to pass the bill with a favorable expression and send it to the floor. The committee then considered Senate Bill 59, sponsored by Senator Jimmy Higdon, with a committee substitute adopted first. Higdon said the substitute limited the bill to existing church property and the measure would allow religious institutions to build affordable housing on their property while still requiring local governing-body approval and compliance with building codes. Supporters framed it as a housing-supply tool and a way to use nonprofits and churches to help address Kentucky’s housing shortage, while questions focused on tax impacts, local control, and whether the bill could be used for single-family homes or other developments. A public witness from Henry County opposed the bill, arguing it could enable discriminatory housing and reduce local tax revenue. After discussion, the committee voted 9-0 to pass SB 59 with a favorable expression. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 313 from Senator Phillip Wheeler, which would designate June as Kentucky History Month. Wheeler and Kentucky Historical Society Executive Director Scott Alvi said the bill would help promote Kentucky history statewide, especially in connection with the U.S. 250th commemoration in 2026, and would build on existing June observances such as Statehood Day and Boone Day. The committee approved the bill with favorable expression, and the chair announced it would proceed to the floor.

Transcript Highlights:

• A couple of years ago, Representative Williams was working on a bill kind of in this section of code,
• And it places the new section of the Delaware Code created in Section 3 of this act into its own chapter
• This act does not prevent a government.
• the code.
• the code or from the section of if no questions, voice vote.

Summary: The House received a series of Senate communications and committee reports, then took up a long consent calendar and several individual measures. Early actions included passing consent calendar items, recognizing Freedom of Speech Week and Juneteenth, and hearing numerous introductions and tributes, including remarks honoring House fellows, Father’s Day, and Representative Mara Gorman. The chamber also adopted several procedural motions and recesses, with roll calls recorded throughout. Among the bills considered, the House passed House Bill 134 on animal cruelty, increasing penalties for repeat offenses; House Bill 131 with Senate Amendment 1 on pet stores and animal welfare; House Substitute 1 for House Bill 320 on technical corrections to the Delaware Constitution; House Substitute 1 for House Bill 407 on technical updates to the Hazardous Substance Control Act; House Substitute 1 for House Bill 425 on salary supplements for certain school employees; House Substitute 1 for House Bill 450, the Road Delaware Act, on land use and permitting reform; House Bill 459 on restricting energy drink sales in schools; House Substitute 1 for House Bill 439 on electric moped and motorcycle disclosures; and House Bill 444, the Delaware John Lewis Voting Rights Act, after amendment delaying its effective date to July 1, 2027. House Amendment 1 to House Bill 459 was adopted, and House Amendment 1 to House Bill 444 was adopted before final passage. The House also rejected House Amendment 1 to House Substitute 1 for House Bill 425 after debate over salary supplement policy for school-related certifications, then passed the substitute bill itself. House Bill 407 prompted questions about the increase in civil penalties, which DENREC said was intended to update outdated fines and align the penalty structure with other laws. House Bill 444 drew floor speeches emphasizing voting rights protections and concerns about voter suppression and dilution. The session ended with the House moving to recess after continuing consideration of House Bill 355, the Speaker Truth Act, which had just adopted an amendment changing damages language to attorney’s fees and costs.

Transcript Highlights:

• It was previously in Section 48-09-03, and it's moved up to Section 1 for clarity.
• Section 3 is a section regarding security that's provided by the offeror.
• Well, and the question has to do with perhaps it's in a different section of code, because we find that
• Well, and the question has to do with perhaps it's in a different section of code, because we find that
• Well, and the question has to do with perhaps it's in a different section of code, because we find that

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Our regulation section is really the primary The regulation section is really the primary section that
• county codes.
• code?
• , the state building code, the state energy code, the state... ...the state existing building code, the
• There was inconsistency between energy code, building code, and various codes.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:03:19.440> the rules and policies governing the rules and policies governing the collection
• We strongly support the procurement code.
• Remove the preamble section, and in section 2 require that Cales must have connections to public utilities
• <00:57:37.720> five<00:57:37.960> and year 27 and sections five and year 27 and sections
• six remove the appropriation section six remove the appropriation section seven<00:57:43.119>

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The committee took up House Bill 422, relating to school impact fees. The Education Committee recommended passage with amendments, and Ways and Means concurred. The amendments would repeal the construction fee component of the school impact fee while retaining the land impact fee and in-lieu fee requirements, remove related statutory language, exempt certain developments from school impact fees, raise the unit threshold for satisfying the land component to 100 units, require the School Facilities Authority to adopt rules and policies, and require a report to the Legislature on the effect of repealing the construction portion of the fee. The measure was also given a sunset date of June 30, 2029, with the committee report to note that the changes are intended to test the efficiency and efficacy of the fee structure and could be made permanent if the report supports that outcome. The committees adopted the recommendation, with one senator initially voting no and then changing to yes after the amendments were explained. The meeting also included a separate hearing on House Bill 1155, concerning procurement for Department of Transportation projects and construction manager/general contractor procurement. DOT testified that it supported the concept but wanted to narrow the bill, saying the current language was too broad and that the goal was to allow more innovative procurement while preserving selection safeguards. The State Procurement Office said it supported the bill’s language but was willing to work with DOT on alternative wording. Several construction-related organizations, including subcontractors, iron workers, elevator constructors, and building trades representatives, opposed the bill, arguing that exemptions from the procurement code would weaken protections such as retainage, equality, and prompt payment and could invite favoritism or corruption. In response to those concerns, the chair proposed amendments limiting the exemption to DOT, narrowing the qualifying contracts, adding a two-year sunset, requiring a report after the first year, and clarifying that project management could not be procured under the section. The amended recommendation passed, though several members voted with reservations. A separate item, House Bill 476, was briefly called up at the end of the agenda, with a recommendation to pass with amendments to increase a rate from 7.25% to 8%, but discussion was not completed in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• or the the Fire Prevention code.
• Section Sevens 7, 60.0, 2, 6, has been an extremely powerful tool to prevent local governments from discriminating
• Section 3 of the bill adopt a modern approach.
• On Uniform commercial code. Senator Grall.
• Senators this bill amends Section one. 77 Florida statute to require local governments review and approve

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, this is in the current code, but it is also in this code.
• So if anyone were to remove a sign... ...code, but it is also in this code.
• That's in the current code.
• So this bill does nothing more than go through and move everything from one section of the code, and
• of the housing sections.

Keywords: 985, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Out of Elections and Government Affairs, two favorable, two on its merits.
• of Elections and Government Affairs, two favorable, two on its merits.
• I do see a requirement under Chapter Section 36, which is good.
• Under line 126, Section 36, which is good.
• I'm not telling the federal government what to do.

Keywords: 1064, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Another code that typically gets put in that same boat is the National Electrical Code.
• “The other thing the International Code Council has just done in relation to the energy code, because
• And the only reason why that's in the plumbing code is because it's in the state sanitary code.
• And the only reason why that's in the plumbing code is because it's in the state sanitary code.
• Code.

Summary: The House Committee on Commerce met on May 18, 2026, with a quorum present and the chair noting it was the committee’s last meeting of the session. The committee first considered Senate Bill 254, which would prohibit certain excess debit card surcharges and authorize enforcement by the Attorney General. After adopting technical amendments and a committee amendment requiring written notice before a private right of action, the bill was reported favorably as amended. The committee then took up Senate Bill 80 on broadband administration fees and GUMBO program closeout. Members questioned the proposed increase in administrative and contractor fees, the timing of project completion, and how withheld reimbursements would work for utility damage. After adopting several amendments, including cleanup language and a provision to restore the reimbursement process, the bill was reported favorably as amended, though the Louisiana Telecommunications Association voiced concerns about the withholding language and lack of a clearer fault-determination process. The committee next considered Senate Bill 469, updating the Louisiana Underground Utilities and Facilities Damage Prevention Law. Technical amendments were adopted, along with amendments clarifying that the bill’s 30-day notice to utility owner-operators is separate from existing GUMBO notice requirements and creating a rapid dispute-resolution process involving the Office of Broadband, the utility operator, and the local governing authority. Testimony from broadband and municipal stakeholders emphasized the need for quicker responses to excavation damage and better enforcement, while some witnesses raised concerns about the late amendment and the need for clearer recourse and standards. The bill was reported favorably as amended. Senate Bill 468, dealing with fuel rewards programs and fuel discount limits, was also amended to allow such discounts while capping them at $1 below the advertised price; it was reported favorably as amended. Senate Bill 131, concerning attorney’s fees and costs in professional licensing disciplinary proceedings, drew testimony from a cosmetology board representative and the Pelican Institute. Supporters argued the bill would curb incentives for boards to generate revenue through enforcement and give licensees a fairer opportunity to resolve cases; board testimony noted that some boards already have fee caps and that enforcement actions are relatively limited. After adopting an amendment clarifying when a licensee is the prevailing party, the bill was reported favorably as amended. Senate Bill 251 on critical infrastructure protection also received technical amendments and several substantive changes, including adding ports and airports to the definition of critical infrastructure, clarifying “significant access,” adding a knowledge requirement, and adjusting exemptions and enforcement timing; it was reported favorably as amended after testimony from State Armor representatives about foreign adversary threats. Finally, House Resolution 253 was introduced to create a task force to study how post-2005 building code additions and inspection requirements affect residential construction costs, with the sponsor explaining the goal was to gather industry input and return recommendations next session.

Transcript Highlights:

• code.
• code.
• code.
• B,<00:09:29.279> any sectioning code.
• And then section B, any sectioning code.

Bills: HB3, HB116, HB165, HB178, HB3, HB116, HB165, HB178

Keywords: illegal alien, enhanced sentencing, criminal offenses, minor victims, felonies, Alabama legislature, HB116, Alabama Sunset Law, sunset bill, sunset review, Alabama Professional Bail Bonding Board, bail bonding, bail bonds, bail bond industry, professional bail bondsman, licensing board, state agency continuation, agency reauthorization, regulatory board, criminal justice

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, so there are several different chapters to this code section.
• I thought we codified the common law portion of... excuse me, code law within the code section maybe
• about... within the code section maybe about three, four, or five years ago.
• So, it's a whole process and code section for dealing with mergers, and it's not a... for dealing with
• So one of the things that the bill does in the LLC section is a couple of sections.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• will not be available to the public the discharge papers none at any time that just it caught up one section
• Makes your military discharge papers are not available to any person except as provided in the section
• They just kind of tap in some code words and then it says deny or don't deny.
• You reckon You reckon for your explanation, so Title 50, Section 16, cities and towns have the power

Bills: SB1983, SB444, SB1503, SB1561, SB592, SB1501, SB1946, SB1567, SB1833, SB2026, SB904, SB2178, SB1651, SB1558, SB1565, SB1553, SB1257, SB65, SB1749, SB1242, SB1642, SB640, SB667, SB1436, SB1484, SB1562, SB1794, SB1644, SB1533, SB933, SB1555

Keywords: SB1983, foster care, resource family partner, resource family partners, Department of Human Services, DHS, child welfare, foster homes, foster children, placement data, data sharing, de-identified data, aggregated data, sibling groups, placement disruptions, foster parent recruitment, foster parent retention, private child-placing agency, Title 10A, Oklahoma

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:23:26.799> with problem, but the updated code with problem, but the updated code with
• ><00:26:42.799> residential<00:26:43.360> code building code and the residential code building
• code and the residential code correct<00:26:44.480> errors<00:26:44.880> in<00:26:45.200
• coordination with the fire code issues. coordination with the fire code issues.
• House Bill 134 is the one we just heard, and this is on the code building code.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That entire section was taken out.
• and 51501 of the Education Code.
• he was a government teacher or, as a government teacher, as an example, but that he would use, for example
• And so let me begin with Section 7, and this is a section where it begins by Section 51500.
• 7, new Section 7, discriminatory Section 7, new Section 7.

Summary: The Assembly Education Committee held an informational hearing on AB 715, followed by discussion of SB 48. AB 715 was presented by Assembly Members Zbur and Addis as a response to rising anti-Semitism in California schools. They described incidents involving harassment, swastikas, biased classroom materials, and students feeling unsafe, and said the bill would create an Office of Civil Rights with coordinators to address anti-Semitism and other forms of discrimination, provide prevention resources, and support school districts. Witnesses in support, including a rabbi and a student who described personal experiences with anti-Semitic harassment, urged immediate action to protect Jewish students. Opposition testimony came from the California Teachers Association, county superintendents, school board groups, labor organizations, civil liberties advocates, ethnic studies educators, and many community members. Their main concerns were that the bill was rushed, had not been fully vetted in the Assembly Education Committee, and could chill classroom speech or create constitutional problems, especially around language requiring instruction and materials to be “factually accurate” and not based on advocacy, bias, or partisanship. Several opponents argued that anti-Semitism should be addressed through education, training, and restorative practices rather than new statutory restrictions. Some witnesses also raised concerns about the bill’s impact on ethnic studies and free speech. Committee members then debated the bill’s process and substance at length. The authors said the bill had been narrowed through negotiations with education stakeholders and the Senate, that some disputed provisions would be revisited in cleanup language, and that the urgency of anti-Semitic incidents required action now. Several members expressed support for the bill’s goal but criticized the late release of the final language and the lack of consultation with the Assembly committee. Others emphasized the need to protect Jewish students immediately and argued the bill was a necessary response to a real crisis. The transcript does not show a final vote on AB 715 in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Gutierrez, this bill would remove the merchant codes for certain firearms.
• As a former retail worker, the merchant codes and the codes that we use give us a lot of data.
• Senate Bill 1293, amending section 42-6209, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to government property
• Today, as we speak right now, my youngest granddaughter is having a C-section.
• Today, as we speak right now, my youngest granddaughter is having a C-section.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, sections 2 through 46 of article 8 reflect the Department of Labor and Industry's construction codes
• Uh, sections 2 through 46 of article 8 reflect the Department of Labor and Industry's construction codes
• And that's why I support repealing these two sections and going back and letting the code adoption process
• And that's why I support repealing these two sections and going back and letting the code adoption process
• And that's why I support repealing these two sections and going back and letting the code adoption process

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• section.
• Weeks depending on code section.
• So, that is the code section we're talking about here for those of us that don't practice criminal law
• Section three is the Medicaid code section. It's rather lengthy.
• the Medicaid code section and that provides that uh under the inmate's account, which already exists

Keywords: MS Senate Floor - 1 April, 2026; 10:00 AM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• credit, we look at that section of the federal tax code and say, "Hey, you need to qualify for this
• The language within the earned income tax credit section of the Internal Revenue Code that has not been
• :52:50.000> Revenue<00:52:50.400> Code<00:52:50.720> for section of the Internal
• Revenue Code for section of the Internal Revenue Code for for<00:52:51.280> the<00:52:51.440>
• , section of the Internal Revenue Code, section of the Internal Revenue Code, that<00:53:34.880><

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Less government is more for me.
• "Section 13 in Section 1 of the bill, and you go from 13A through 13D. I'm sorry, 13D.
• That's RSA 170-E, Section 41.
• <02:20:35.640> proposed<02:20:36.040> section costly um in section proposed section
• of part two the form of government section<04:06:12.640> and<04:06:12.880> succeeding<

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Judiciary Committee met to hear House Bill 520, which would authorize the Department of Education to issue subpoenas in investigations and hearings involving the code of conduct for New Hampshire educators. Representative Lynn, the bill sponsor, said the measure was intended to give the department standard subpoena power during investigations and in later adjudicatory proceedings, with a process for challenging overbroad subpoenas. He argued that agencies with investigative and hearing authority should also have the power to compel witnesses and documents, and said the bill was narrowed from an earlier broader draft to focus on teacher credentialing and address concerns about scope. Members raised several concerns about whether the department already has enough authority, whether the Attorney General could handle subpoenas instead, and whether the bill creates an imbalance by giving subpoena power mainly to the investigating side. Representative Burroughs said she did not feel she had enough information and was uncomfortable with the bill, especially regarding who bears subpoena costs. Representative Biron questioned the trial analogy and whether both sides truly have equal subpoena rights. Lynn responded that the investigative stage is like a grand jury process, where only the investigating body subpoenas witnesses, while the adjudicatory stage allows both sides to seek subpoenas through the hearing officer. Other questions focused on the bill’s scope. Representative Andreos asked what investigative authority the Department of Education already has, and Representative Organ questioned why the bill is limited to educators rather than also covering vendors, charter school boards, or the EFA scholarship organization. Lynn said the limitation to educators was deliberate, because earlier broader versions drew objections for being too expansive. Representative Tur asked whether the Attorney General could already handle such matters, and Lynn said that while the AG might be able to pursue some investigations or court subpoenas, agencies should be able to conduct their own internal investigations. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• . section. section.
• And then the building code that they followed was approved by government inspectors to inspect that because
• And then the building code that they followed was approved by government inspectors to inspect that because
• of the code.
• > government, A bloated government, state government, A bloated government, state government,

Keywords: 1187, senate, all