Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial liability'

Page 130 of 363
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Finance (04/01/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • And there was some discussion as well about the impact on the judicial branch if there is litigation
  • And there was some discussion as well about the impact on the judicial branch if there is litigation
  • So, I think that leaves you open to liability.
  • think that leaves you open to liability. think that leaves you open to liability.
  • :58:43.199> exposure A bit of liability exposure.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee first considered House Bill 66, a right-to-know measure that would broaden access from “citizen” to “person,” including out-of-state requesters. Members also adopted an amendment removing the current no-filing-fee provision for appeals of unfavorable right-to-know ombudsman rulings, citing budget concerns. The bill was then reported ought to pass as amended on a 16-9 vote, with a minority report requested. House Bill 187, which would let a parent or guardian seek a protective order on behalf of a minor alleging abuse by someone outside the family or household, was described as a narrow fix with little fiscal impact. It passed unanimously, 25-0, and was placed on the consent calendar. House Bill 215, requiring landfill permit applicants to submit a report on potential harms and benefits, was retained because its policy had been folded into House Bill 2; the committee voted 25-0 to retain it. House Bill 219, dealing with renewable portfolio standard changes and lower renewable energy certificate values, drew opposition from members who said it would weaken renewable energy development and raise concerns about energy costs, but the motion to retain was adopted 14-11, allowing the bill to be moved into House Bill 2. The committee then retained House Bills 365, 552, 566, 572, 607, 611, and 624, all by unanimous or near-unanimous votes, generally because the relevant policy or funding had been incorporated into House Bill 2 or because the bills were viewed as technical or low-impact. HB 566 was described as a landfill leach-management bill with a fiscal note under $10,000 annually and was sent to consent. HB 572 and HB 607 were retained because their money components were moved into HB 2, though one member objected that HB 607 represented an unfunded mandate for the Hampton Beach Area Commission. House Bill 511, concerning ICE detainers and county detention practices, generated the most debate. Supporters said the amendment clarified how long counties may hold detainees without a federal contract and compared the detention period to existing bail rules; opponents argued the bill could sanction detention of people not charged with crimes and raised due-process concerns. The committee adopted the amendment 14-11 and then reported the bill ought to pass as amended on another 14-11 vote, with a minority report requested. House Bill 639, involving securities and digital currency issues, was also reported ought to pass after members noted unresolved concerns but said the Secretary of State’s Securities Division was willing to continue working on it in the other body; the vote was 16-10.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • services from the courts to the judicial services from the courts to the judicial council.<05:21
  • These both delay the obligation for the judicial branch to hire a judicial training coordinator and to
  • This went through already as a bill. council or judicial excuse me judicial council or judicial excuse
  • This was a request from the judicial This was a request from the judicial branch<05:41:58.798>
  • Judicial districts.
Keywords: 10am HB 1 & HB 2, 928, house, all
Summary: The committee of conference on HB 1 and HB 2 reviewed comparison documents and worked through a long list of House and Senate positions, agreeing on some technical or already-enacted items while setting aside others for later discussion. Early on, members agreed to delete a House Bill 2 section tied to a bill already passed into law, and a representative explained a technical amendment to the EFA provisions clarifying enrollment-cap repeal language and compulsory attendance rules for EFA students. That amendment was discussed but a vote was postponed because not all members were present. The committee also noted that the overall EFA budget numbers had already been settled separately. Several items were either agreed to or held for further negotiation. Members agreed to delete sections already covered by other enacted bills, including BTLA-related language, and to accept a technical amendment changing "municipalities" to "political subdivisions" in a section affecting funding eligibility. They also agreed on some items involving workers’ compensation second injuries, certain pilot-program language, and some sections related to state loan repayment and other technical corrections. In contrast, they set aside or disputed items involving site evaluation, lottery-related provisions, opioid abatement, the Commission on Aging, Granite Advantage premium costs, renewable energy/offshore wind funding, special education funding, and several education trust fund and unique-fund provisions. The committee spent substantial time on policy disputes. The House side argued against keeping money in dedicated Fish and Game funds rather than increasing the main Fish and Game fund, while the Senate side defended its approach and raised concerns about fee impacts, including one tied to the fishing license. The members also discussed a housing appeals board proposal, with one member suggesting a possible compromise that would preserve some function while shifting duties and possibly sunsetting the arrangement later; the contracts for the positions were noted as running through June 30, 2028 and June 30, 2029. Another extended discussion concerned the child advocate records-access section, which one side wanted removed as policy that should go through the normal bill process, while another member asked to hold it and suggested a possible middle-ground, time-limited approach. Later, the committee agreed to remove sections already handled in other bills, including House sections 254 and 255, and discussed but did not resolve disputes over liquor licensing functions, cannabis-related language, cost containment, special education, and several fee and fund provisions. The Senate explained its position on the governor’s commission language, saying opioid abatement trust funds could not be used for that purpose and that the commission should continue to be funded through 5% of gross liquor profits; it also described renaming the body the Commission on Addiction Treatment and Prevention and expanding its scope to include problem gambling. The meeting ended with several major items still open for later negotiation.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • , the State Office Building, and Parking Lot C to the west side of the Capitol building, and the Judicial
  • <00:08:03.360> We<00:08:03.599> are<00:08:03.759> simply the judicial building
  • We are simply the judicial building.
  • We've been in the Judicial Building with it under different policies, but we will again continue to have
  • building with it uh uh in the judicial building with it uh under<00:15:36.959> different<00:15
Keywords: 918, senate, all
Summary: Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner Bob Jacobson and State Patrol Colonel Christina Bogoich announced that weapon screening will begin Tuesday at the Minnesota State Capitol, at the start of the 2026 legislative session. They said the change is based on an independent security assessment and the Axtell report’s top recommendation, and is intended as an added layer of protection rather than a weapons ban or a change in state law. Both officials emphasized that the Capitol should remain open, accessible, and welcoming while reducing preventable risks, citing increased threats nationwide and the recent murders of Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and Mark Hortman and the shootings of Senator John Hoffman and Yvette Hoffman. Officials said visitors will enter through four public access points, with all other exterior doors closed to public entry. The primary entrance will be the south ground-level entrance, with additional access through tunnels connecting to the Senate building, State Office Building, Parking Lot C, and the Judicial Center. They said the screening process should take only seconds for most people, with bags scanned separately and additional checks only if needed. Prohibited items will not be stored by the Capitol, and the public was told to plan ahead, carry fewer items, and follow staff instructions. The Capitol will close to the general public at 4:30 p.m. on weekdays unless legislative business is still underway, in which case accommodations will be made. In questions, officials said people with valid permit-to-carry authorization may still bring a firearm if it is otherwise legal, but they must declare the permit, show government ID, and go through screening. Elected officials are exempt and will have a separate lane, while staff will be screened. They also said the tunnels will be locked with restricted key-card access, and that the Senate is implementing its own screening, with questions about Senate doors referred there. Jacobson said the State Patrol will cover the costs within its existing budget, and that the process will be evaluated and adjusted as needed to keep it efficient and not a deterrent to visitors.
VA

Virginia 2026 Regular Session

March 13, 2026 - Regular Session

Virginia House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • joint order and the House Joint Resolution, nominations have been made by the Senate for certain judicial
  • pursuant to House Joint Resolution 315, that nominations have been made by the Senate for certain judicial
  • Nominations are now in order for judges of the judicial circuit.
  • Block voting for judges and other judicial officers will now commence.
  • duly elected as judges of the juvenile and domestic relations district courts of the appropriate judicial
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Government Operations Division Apr 14th, 2025 at 02:30 pm

Appropriations - Government Operations Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • This might sound like a silly question, but is it mostly the legislative and judicial that because they're
  • So cabinet agencies, elected officials, but not judicial and not legislative, as you said.
  • Elected officials, but not judicial and not legislative, as you said.
  • is written, that we are only assessed rent on executive branch office space, not legislative or judicial
  • Legislative or judicial. Okay. Okay. Okay. Some squatters moved in.
Bills: SB2014
Summary: The Government Operations Division met to continue work on the remaining bill and related amendments. Joe Morse asked the committee to include a $219,000 general fund replacement for rent that would no longer be collected from Career and Technical Education after the 15th floor of the tower becomes legislative space under the Legislative Council’s jurisdiction. Members discussed that state law currently requires rent only from executive branch office space, not legislative or judicial space, and there was no objection to adding the request to the amendment package. The committee then revisited a set of amendments it had previously discussed, including whether to include funding for Prairie Public. Senator Dwyer argued against any Prairie Public funding, citing its reserves, endowment, and charitable gaming revenue, and said the state should prioritize other needs. Senator Irby supported a one-time infrastructure contribution as the state shares in related infrastructure costs. Senator Sickler said Prairie Public still provides unique local programming, but that a one-time infrastructure item would be a reasonable compromise rather than ongoing operating support. A motion was made and seconded to provide Prairie Public $850,000 from the Strategic Investment and Improvement Fund for infrastructure needs. The roll call vote failed 3-2, with Senators Sickler and Irby voting aye, Senators Dwyer and Burkhard voting no, and Chairman Wanzek voting yes. After that vote, the committee indicated the amendment package was otherwise complete, though leadership had asked that final action on the bill be held for a little longer. The meeting adjourned with the understanding that more amendments could still be brought forward before the next meeting.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 11, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judicial discretion, due process protections, and prosecutorial judgment remain fully intact.
  • I'm the state court administrator for the Wyoming Judicial Branch.
  • That takes a lot of judicial discretion away.
  • <01:19:22.080> discretion That takes a lot of judicial discretion That takes a lot of judicial
  • > discretion<01:19:25.199> actually in the judicial discretion actually in the judicial
Bills: HB0008, HB0009
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 4th, 2025

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • The judicial branch will be in charge of the planning.
  • And the judicial branch, out of the three, is the most stable.
  • Gabor Health regions, which can be as small as a county and as large as multiple judicial districts,
  • So, for example, the Health Care Authority is requesting judicial liaisons.
  • If we want to create the system that interacts with the judicial system as well, as well as having it
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, April 8, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Over a judicial Commonwealth's history.
  • This is judicial warfare in the flesh.
  • This is judicial warfare in the flesh.
  • response in our democracy to a judicial response in our democracy to a judicial decision<05:45:16.638
  • They believed in judicial review then.
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 113 May 6th, 2026

Colorado House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • they shouldn't be used as cover for a lawfare bill that turns policy disagreement into open-ended liability
  • disagreement<01:19:48.000> into disagreement into disagreement into open-ended<01:19:49.760> liability
  • open-ended liability. open-ended liability.
Keywords: 981, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Executive Departments and Administration (02/18/2026)

Executive Departments and Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • review is warranted in in some judicial review is warranted in in some of<01:23:39.920> these
  • It's supposed to be prudent and judicious. And it might be unique, but it might not.
  • > might<01:42:27.760> be<01:42:27.920> unique,<01:42:28.480> but judicious
  • And it might be unique, but judicious.
  • Maybe interim studies are a better deal on this because what about liability if they reveal is is that
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Conference Committee on SF3432 5/15/26

Transcript Highlights:
  • beginning on page one under the Supreme Court, House File 3432 includes, on line seven, security for judicial
  • A judicial security unit that's two FTE positions on line eight of $312,000 per year.
  • 10:06.800> court, Um, moving down to the appeals court, there is $60,000 for security for judicial
  • Under the district courts, there is $843,000 in fiscal year 27 for security for judicial officials, with
  • And Madam Chair, that brings us to public safety. judicial officials with $467,000 judicial officials
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The Conference Committee on Senate File 3432 met on May 15, 2026, and first approved a motion to continue meeting past midnight. Members then reviewed the public safety and judiciary budget agreement, including funding for non-fatal shooting clearance grants, a domestic violence task force, services for released adults and juveniles, trafficking prevention for youth, corrections bed impacts from assault and theft-related provisions, increased Philando Castile training reimbursements, and transfers into the Victims of Crime Account. The committee also noted that some items were removed because they had already passed as stand-alone bills, including impersonation of a peace officer and the grooming penalty, and that the first responder uniform ID task force would not be funded in this bill. Policy provisions discussed for the public safety side included a domestic violence response task force, trafficking and sexual exploitation prevention grants, juvenile re-entry services, the Minnesota clearance grant program, the Philando Castile Memorial Training Fund, confidentiality for victim statements to the Clemency Review Commission, the fourth-degree assault amendment for hospital or clinic security guards, the enhanced penalty for theft from a vulnerable adult, child sexual abuse material venue and evidence provisions, and revised language on prediction markets and the Attorney General’s administrative subpoena authority. The chair also said the committee had to make late fixes to some stakeholder-requested changes and expressed frustration about the timing. The committee then reviewed the safety and security budget agreement, which included funding for judicial security, a judicial security unit, security threat response, safe and secure courthouse grants, appeals court and district court security, state patrol deficiency funding, capital security screening and enhancements, legislative protective services, BCA threat assessment and investigation, a security services task force, legislative security reimbursements, and security for constitutional officers. The agreement also included technical court reallocation adjustments and DNR carry-forward authority for certain non-budgeted public safety costs incurred in 2026. After no public testimony was offered, the committee adopted both the public safety budget agreement and the safety and security budget agreement, directed non-partisan staff to prepare the conference committee report with technical and conforming changes, and then adjourned.
VA

Virginia 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Mar 6th, 2026

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • The second way is the judicial warrant process through signature of a judge. is eight, as I've been told
  • The second way is the judicial warrant process through signature of a judge.
  • The other way is the judicial warrant process through the signature of a judge for that detainer.
  • focused on and we're talking about, I understand that the governor has said that ICE would need a judicial
  • If they want, in the scenario, if a judicial warrant would have been in place, that would have likely
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Feb 26th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The officers who wield the judicial power of the state. state of Texas.
  • The Judicial Compensation Commission has recommended a 30% increase in the base pay. for judges this
  • Do it because you have a... constitutional obligation to fund the judicial branch at a level that allows
  • Constitution makes the Supreme Court responsible for the efficient administration of the judicial branch
  • Back quickly to the topic of judicial pay, he had to leave the bench. bench many years ago to help send
Keywords: 1184, house, all
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Standing Committee on Judiciary. (2-4-26)

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Just, um, real quick again, Jackie Steel, attorney, 27th Judicial Circuit.
  • There's protections in the judicial system for that material so it doesn't get out.
  • <00:13:57.519> Um<00:13:58.639> again attorney 27th Judicial Circuit.
  • Um again attorney 27th Judicial Circuit.
  • There's protections<00:14:40.000> in<00:14:40.399> the<00:14:40.639> judicial<00
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The House Judiciary Committee met for its third meeting of the 2026 session and considered three bills. House Bill 50, relating to the removal of persons unlawfully occupying real property, was presented by Rep. Emily Callaway, who said it built on last session’s House Bill 10 addressing squatter-related criminal trespass and noted positive implementation feedback from law enforcement. The committee took no substantive testimony against the bill and passed it 16-0, reporting it favorably. House Bill 249, relating to involuntary commitment, was introduced by Rep. Mitch Whitaker and would expand current involuntary commitment provisions to include sexual abuse in the first degree. Whitaker and Commonwealth’s Attorney Jackie Steel argued the change was needed because some defendants charged with sexual offenses not currently covered could otherwise be released without treatment or supervision, creating a public safety risk. Rep. Burke passed on the vote to continue the conversation but said he expected to support it on the floor. The committee passed the bill 15-0 with one pass and reported it favorably. House Bill 305, relating to grand jury service, was presented by Rep. Candy Maserone and supported by Sheri Ballard, who described the impact of the Crystal Rogers case and said secretly recorded grand jury testimony had gone unaddressed because the statute of limitations was too short. The committee substitute extended the limitations period for secretly recorded grand jury testimony to 10 years, set a five-year period for unrecorded communications, and added discovery-related language. Jackie Steel supported the bill but asked for an exemption or clarification so prosecutors could perform grand jury duties without risking felony charges; members discussed secrecy, witness safety, and obstruction concerns. The committee adopted the substitute and passed HB 305 17-0, reporting it favorably as the Crystal Rogers Act.
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, December 1, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <04:41:02.638> in<04:41:02.878> the trillion dollars liability in the trillion dollars
  • liability in the Medicare<04:41:03.520> fund<04:41:04.480> and<04:41:04.798> hospitals
  • This bill strengthens taxpayer rights during judicial proceedings before the U.S. Tax Court.
  • proceedings before the US tax judicial proceedings before the US tax court.<05:34:48.638> The
  • review to the benefit of its judicial review to the benefit of the<05:34:59.920> taxpayer.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so that's a judicial branch function.
  • But if the bill requires a judicial officer to sign a citation, then it's forcing a judicial officer
  • So signing a summons is a judicial function. Signing the...
  • So is signing a summons a judicial function? Signing the summons is.
  • error, just like not signing a search warrant is a judicial error.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Ways and Means Committee 4/22/26

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Second, we're doing this in a judicious way with our budgeting, making these investments in a manner
  • Second, we're doing this in a judicious Second, we're doing this in a judicious way<00:04:42.680
  • and furthermore, these reforms I think are in the interest of more transparency and oversight and judicious
  • Sort of addressing housing instability, this is a judicious and smart way to utilize these resources.
  • and furthermore, these reforms I think are in the interest of more transparency and oversight and judicious
Keywords: 1183, house
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on County & Regional Government Mar 31st, 2025

S/C on County & Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • bill today, but, uh, we show him registered as Philip McFurlough registering as, uh, um, the 106th judicial
  • They are part of the judicial system, a valuable part of the judicial system.
  • , how many judges do, do you have a sense of how many judges across the state are actually doing judicial
  • know, it's a big part of the local program when you, when you're trying to be expeditious on your Judicial
  • They, they do quite a bit of, of judicial work in addition, probably some other things that I left off
ND
Transcript Highlights:
  • And he was very concerned about the liability, the responsibility in one portion of the code that you
  • You know, we want to be a little, well, we want to be judicious in terms of you're asking exactly what
  • Well, I think it might have been, not purposely, but if that is the number that generates no tax liability
Keywords: 908, all
Summary: The subcommittee of the Tax Reform and Relief Committee met with a quorum to begin its study of whether the content of North Dakota real estate tax statements should be revised to improve transparency. Legislative Council staff reviewed the background for the study, including House Bill 1176, current statutory requirements for tax statements, and recent changes such as separate line items for bonded debt, primary residence credit, and legacy fund-related amounts. The Tax Department then explained the current statement format and noted that the form is prescribed and approved by the tax commissioner, with changes typically driven by statute and implemented collaboratively with counties and vendors. County officials from the North Dakota Association of Counties described the full annual process for preparing budgets, setting levies, calculating taxable values, and issuing notices and tax statements. They said counties spend significant time coordinating with taxing districts, neighboring counties, and software vendors, and that the new budget hearing notices and valuation notices have not generated much public response. Members raised concerns about the usefulness and clarity of certain line items, especially the legislative tax relief calculation and the primary residence credit, and discussed whether the current statement creates confusion rather than transparency. Testimony also addressed the 3% cap, mill levy worksheets, assessment cycles, and the role of county auditors and tax directors in maintaining accurate values. The committee also heard from software vendors CPT and Tyler Technologies about how legislative changes are programmed into tax systems and how online taxpayer portals can provide more detailed breakdowns of tax bills. Vendors said changes required by law are generally absorbed in contracts rather than billed directly to counties, and they demonstrated web tools and pie-chart style breakdowns that show where tax dollars go. NDACO presented a survey of eight counties estimating tax statement preparation and mailing costs, concluding that outsourced printing tends to be cheaper on average and that total statewide tax statement costs may be roughly $600,000, though the estimate was based on limited data. No votes were taken; the meeting was informational and focused on gathering testimony and identifying issues for possible future recommendations or bill drafts.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee Jun 24th, 2026

Utilities and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • large energy users like data centers to protect ratepayers from cost shifts and stranded asset liabilities
  • centers as eligible to be classified as environmental leadership development projects that may receive judicial
  • like Nextera and Duke, are at triple B plus, much safer investments because they don't have strict liability
Keywords: 988, house, all