Video & Transcript Research : 'training services'

Page 12 of 500
VT
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce May 20th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • We do sell services, sir, but I'm really bringing a perspective from my time in the service.
  • in NSCC and high-value services.
  • out for services?
  • Further, both service contracts and services cancelable at any time remain protected under the FTC's
  • It carves out over 550 state-licensed service contract providers, as well as an unknown number of service
Summary: The committee took up several pending business items and reported a series of House bills out of committee, including HB 2467, HB 2468, HB 2518, HB 4310, HB 4386, HB 4490, HB 5323, and HB 149. Most of these were advanced on committee substitute motions and sent to the local and uncontested calendar or reported favorably to the full Senate. HB 2467 drew one nay vote, while the others were approved without opposition. HB 4310 and HB 4386 were described as committee-substitute versions with changes narrowing disclosure requirements and preserving attorney-client privilege in certain circumstances. A major portion of the meeting focused on HB 149, an AI governance bill. The substitute was explained as addressing biometric identifier capture and storage, exempting certain AI uses for security and fraud prevention, clarifying definitions, restricting AI systems that simulate explicit child sexual content, adjusting Attorney General investigative authority, refining sandbox program waivers, reducing Texas AI Council powers and membership, and adding DIR coordination provisions. The committee adopted the substitute and reported the bill favorably. The committee then heard extensive testimony on HB 1500, the DIR sunset bill. The author said the bill would continue DIR for 12 years, restructure its board, update advisory committees, require regular cybersecurity assessments and penetration testing for state agencies, improve IT procurement training, and transfer the e-grants program to the Comptroller. A Texas 2036 witness supported the bill as a way to strengthen governance, procurement, and cybersecurity. Members asked detailed questions about the bill’s structure and then left HB 1500 pending. The committee also heard a lengthy presentation on HB 150, which would create the Texas Cyber Command as a component of the University of Texas System, administratively attached to UTSA and located in San Antonio. The author argued the command would centralize cyber threat intelligence, incident response, and digital forensics, and would be able to support state and local entities, with optional services for local governments. Members raised concerns about university mission drift, governance, security, chain of command, procurement authority, gifts and donations, and civil liberties implications of proactive cyber monitoring. Witnesses from UTSA/NSCC and SecurityScorecard testified in support, emphasizing the security of the downtown San Antonio facility, the existing cyber ecosystem there, and the need for a dedicated cyber capability. The bill remained under discussion with no final committee action announced in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • In Texas, implicit bias training is required for new police officers.
  • What should we expect the outcome of this training to be?
  • And so, having this training where perhaps...
  • Bias training for judges is not radical. This concept is not radical.
  • So more training, better training, training on implicit bias makes us all better, our judiciary, and
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thanks to each of you for your service.
  • And so you're providing that service to the patient at the risk that it may not be. covered service.
  • This doesn't even count for issues with services. service, or pre-trial, or post-judgment filings.
  • We provide service. Services for families in their greatest time of need.
  • or funeral services. $50,000.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

House Legislative Session Day 59 (4-14-26) - Part 1

Kentucky House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We all want to our dental services.
  • <02:03:58.480> to Department for Medicaid Services to Department for Medicaid Services to
  • create disruptions in Medicaid services create disruptions in Medicaid services to<02:05:04.639>
  • service to stay alive. service to stay alive. um<02:05:09.760> even<02:05:09.920> the<
  • Sometimes it could cause duplication of services.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Military and Veterans Affairs Committee Feb 12th, 2025

Military and Veterans Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This also allows us to train and assist... ...and provide oversight of the service officers who utilize
  • . ...veteran services.
  • I do have one question: what branch of service was I in? What branch of service I was in?
  • I have learned through my years of service and participation in various service... ...organizations,
  • effective in providing services to thousands of Alabama veterans, opening veteran service offices in
Bills: HB154, HB153, HB180, SB70
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/20/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • are paying high prices for services are paying high prices for services without<00:03:36.799>
  • the rent or services that are provided? the rent or services that are provided?
  • <01:09:28.159> Our services does come at a cost. Our services does come at a cost.
  • their services.
  • as well as life residential services as well as life sharing<01:29:54.000> services.
HI
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

HSH-HLT Joint Public Hearing - Thu Mar 19, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Human Services & Homelessness

Transcript Highlights:
  • training? training?
  • with services.
  • <00:22:38.560> Um proposed training. Um proposed training.
  • people and bring them into services. people and bring them into services.
  • the homeless services. the homeless services.
Summary: The committee heard SB 709 SD2, which would require the Department of Health to respond to reports involving persons with severe mental illness, assess eligibility for assisted community treatment, and coordinate treatment when appropriate. Testimony from the Department of Human Services and the Department of Health supported the measure, with DOH saying it generally supported the bill but had comments on one section it viewed as unnecessary. The Department of Law Enforcement later explained that the bill would shift certification and standards for crisis intervention officer training from DOH to DLE, while still involving DOH in the training process. Opposition came from the Hawaii Disability Rights Center and an individual testifier, both of whom argued the bill expands state authority over people with mental illness and could worsen forced treatment practices. The Disability Rights Center also raised procedural concerns, saying the bill was effectively moved from a prior administration measure that had not been heard this session, and questioned whether the bill’s changes to assisted community treatment, blood tests, urinalysis, and living arrangements went beyond current law. The individual testifier argued the bill would further entrench harmful psychiatric drugging and urged the committee to defer it. Committee members questioned the administration about the bill’s process, the role of the Attorney General in treatment-over-objection proceedings, and the practical effects of moving CIT certification to DLE. The Attorney General’s office said the bill was intended to fill a gap by allowing it to assist with treatment proceedings, while public defenders would continue to represent respondents and due process protections would remain in place. DLE and DOH said the change would better align certification with law enforcement training needs, improve speed in crisis response, and still keep DOH involved; members also discussed whether WAM counted as a hearing and whether the bill should more explicitly preserve DOH’s role. No vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/18/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • facility providing a similar service? facility providing a similar service?
  • for the services that they provide. for the services that they provide.
  • ><01:05:30.400> an<01:05:30.520> entire training hub, but we train an entire training hub
  • Do you have lab services?
  • Do you have lab services? services? services?
Bills: HF4343
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Finance - 05/14/25

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • for Senate File 3407 was completed by the departments of labor and industry, commerce, and human services
  • Um, and finally for DHS, the bill makes technical changes to describe direct support services but doesn't
  • labor and industry, commerce,<00:02:19.040> and<00:02:19.280> human<00:02:19.800> services
  • <00:02:20.800> and commerce, and human services and commerce, and human services and estimates
  • but doesn't impact the support services but doesn't impact the work<00:03:28.159> of<00:03:28.319
Bills: SF1832
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/25

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • there is a new train service which MnDOT estimated would have 125,000 riders in the first year.
  • there is a new train service which MnDOT estimated would have 125,000 riders in the first year.
  • there is a new train service which MnDOT estimated would have 125,000 riders in the first year.
  • there is a new train service which MnDOT estimated would have 125,000 riders in the first year.
  • Let's be clear about this: we are trying to cut services here to this train because we want to make up
Bills: HF1167, HF1242
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • However, we're uh, testing service.
  • Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Medicaid Services, 907 KAR 1595, 1835, Emergency
  • services they would receive? services they would receive?
  • Also, this would include services.
  • Staying with Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Community Based Services, 922 KAR
Summary: The subcommittee approved the minutes from the previous meeting and then took up several regulations. The first was a Department of Veterans Affairs regulation, with a staff amendment, to allow nurse practitioners to apply for the Veterans Affairs nurse loan repayment program year-round and to make technical drafting changes. The committee heard from the Office of Kentucky Veteran Centers, then adopted the staff amendment and approved the regulation without objection. The main item of the meeting was the Board of Optometric Examiners’ proposed amendment to 201 KAR 5:010, which would allow applicants to use the Optometry Examining Board of Canada written exam in place of part one of the National Board of Examiners in Optometry exam for licensure. The board said the change would improve access to care, provide an additional pathway for Canadian-trained candidates, and still require applicants to pass the remaining national board parts. Opponents, including NBEO officials, ARBO, Pearson VUE, and several optometrists, argued the Canadian exam is not equivalent, does not test the same biomedical science content, is not validated for U.S. scope of practice, and raises concerns about test security, transparency, and portability across states. They urged the committee to find the amendment deficient or vote no. Committee members questioned both sides about prior communication with the board, whether Kentucky would be the first state to adopt such a change, the rationale for the proposal, and the cost difference between the exams. Supporters said the board had received some written comments and one phone call, and that the proposal was driven by access concerns and the presence of Canadian students. Opponents said they had not had direct discussions with the Kentucky board before the hearing. No final vote on the optometry regulation is reflected in the transcript excerpt, but the committee heard extensive testimony and rebuttal before moving on.