Video & Transcript Research : 'billing limits'

Page 127 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources May 21st, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Then Senate Bill 2440 came out.
  • The Chair has none of the bills. Bill is left pending. That concludes the meeting.
  • The Chair lays out Senate Bill 3058 and recognizes Representative Gerdes to explain the bill.
  • Senate Bill 3058.
  • The Chair lays out Senate Bill 612 and recognizes Vice Chair Tina Has to explain the bill.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • > um building limit uh limit restrictions um building limit uh limit restrictions um or<00:28:
  • But, so much and please pass this<01:26:42.800> bill. this bill. this bill.
  • Please pass<01:40:52.239> this<01:40:52.480> bill. pass this bill. pass this bill.
  • We are on to bill<02:17:02.160> HB1976 bill HB1976 bill HB1976 HD1<02:17:05.200> relating
  • oppose House Bill 1563. oppose House Bill 1563.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26 - Part 1

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • To the authors, the amendment, would it expand the scope of the bill or would it kind of limit it a bit
  • To the authors, the amendment, would it expand the scope of the bill or would it kind of limit it a bit
  • To the authors, the amendment, would it expand the scope of the bill or would it kind of limit it a bit
  • To the authors, the amendment, would it expand the scope of the bill or would it kind of limit it a bit
  • or would it kind of scope of the bill or would it kind of limit<00:15:32.160> it<00:15:32.320
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Elections - 03/24/26

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • laying this bill over. Okay. laying this bill over. Okay.
  • deleted from this bill. deleted from this bill.
  • bill.
  • . bill. bill.
  • admin bill. admin bill.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Environment and Natural Resources Mar 3rd, 2025

Environment and Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's very limited.
  • Thank you for the explanation of the bill. Senators, any questions on the bill?
  • We support this bill.
  • Members, we are on debate on the bill is amended. Debate on the bill is amended.
  • I haven't explained the bill. Senators, are there questions on the bill?
Summary: The committee began with a presentation from the Florida On-Site Wastewater Association on advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems. Roxanne Groover described several technologies used in Florida, including NSF-245 systems, performance-based treatment systems, in-ground nitrogen-reducing biofilters, membrane/media filters, and sequencing batch reactors. She emphasized that these systems can substantially reduce nitrogen compared with conventional septic systems, discussed permitting and maintenance requirements, and noted that some grant programs help fund upgrades in springs and other impaired-water areas. Members asked about phosphorus and PFAS treatment, funding for non-springs watersheds, incentives for new construction, and whether more data should be collected on system performance. The committee then took up CS for SB 164 on vessel ownership, derelict vessels, and anchoring/mooring rules. The bill was explained as clarifying who is responsible for derelict vessels and using vessel title as prima facie evidence of ownership. Two amendments were adopted: one requiring FWC to offer an electronic long-term anchoring permit system and clarifying that the permit does not override other anchoring limits, and a technical amendment correcting a drafting error. Public testimony included opposition from a cruiser advocacy representative who argued the bill would unfairly restrict responsible boaters and harm the marine economy, and support from another boating coalition representative who said the bill was a proactive step to address derelict vessels. The committee then passed CS/SB 164 favorably by roll call. Finally, the committee considered SB 38, which makes clarifying changes to FWC trust funds. The bill would allow investment and carryover of the administrative trust fund balance, expand use of the Florida Panther Research and Management Trust Fund for feline disease research, monitoring, and habitat acquisition, and allow use of the Non-Game Wildlife Trust Fund for law enforcement and related coordination agreements. With no debate or opposition, the committee passed SB 38 favorably by roll call and then adjourned.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

JHA Public Hearing - Fri Jan 31, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST

Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • We are putting forth a bill.
  • We are putting forth a bill.
  • The next measure is House Bill 304. House Bill 304 relates to the Hawaiian language.
  • So I agree with this bill.
  • This is a bill that fixes a flaw in a previous bill.
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 410, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs’ biennium operating budget. OHA asked for a modest increase over its base budget, including $1.2 million to fund 13 new full-time positions for a strategy and implementation team tied to its long-term plan, with emphasis on housing, education, health, and economic resilience. OHA also described a broader effort to work directly with executive branch departments to improve outcomes for Native Hawaiians. Testimony was largely supportive, with several individuals speaking in favor and one testifier expressing strong frustration about Native Hawaiian rights and access to resources. The chair noted there were 38 additional written/supporting testimonies and three in opposition. Members asked about OHA’s funding sources and public land trust revenues; OHA said it is not receiving the full 20 percent share, described a public land trust working group and system issues, and said a related bill would seek funding to begin an inventory. No vote was taken in the portion provided. The committee then considered House Bill 304, which would make the Hawaiian version of a law binding when the law was originally drafted in Hawaiian and later translated into English. The Judiciary supported the bill, saying it reinforces Hawaiian as an official language and looks to the original language for legislative intent. The Attorney General supported the intent but recommended narrowing the bill with a proviso to avoid ambiguities, limiting it to laws originally drafted in Hawaiian that were not later amended, codified, recodified, or reenacted in English. Public testimony was generally supportive, though one speaker raised broader sovereignty concerns. Members questioned how many laws would be affected and whether the proposed amendment would undercut the bill; the Attorney General said the amendment was meant to address uncertainty in interpretation. No final action was reported. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 603, which would direct OHA to administer a Native Hawaiian business marketing program to promote Native Hawaiian-owned businesses through marketing and technical assistance. OHA supported the concept, saying a label or branding program could help consumers identify and support Native Hawaiian-owned businesses, but requested that funding be redirected to a working group to study program design, implementation, enforcement, and long-term viability. The chair noted four supportive testimonies had been received, and a member asked OHA to confirm that its programs serve all Hawaiians, not only those eligible for homelands; OHA said it serves all Hawaiians in the state. The transcript ends before any vote or further action on HB 603.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select Aug 22nd, 2025

Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair votes out House Bill 254. Chair recognizes Chairman Ashby to explain the bill. Mr.
  • Remember, this is not a spending bill; this is a planning bill.
  • bill.
  • House Bill 164 is left pending. This is House Bill 123. All right.
  • Bill Kerr fund.
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

Judiciary Mar 25th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill is specifically limited.
  • This bill is specifically limited to post-judgment proceedings for terrorism victims.
  • Senate Bill 96, the Jacob Rogers local claims bill, is a local settled claims bill on behalf of the victim
  • Senators, any questions on the bill? Questions on the bill?
  • This bill in '18 changed that. I ask that you support this bill and repeal the '18 bill.
Summary: The committee first took up CS for Senate Bill 304, which would address child protective investigations involving children with certain genetic or medical conditions that can mimic signs of abuse. Senator Sharif and several family members and advocates described cases in which children were removed after injuries were initially misread as abuse, and argued the bill would give parents more opportunity to obtain qualified medical opinions. The committee adopted a substitute amendment that removed language imposing analysis duties on certain medical professionals, then passed the bill favorably after testimony in support from the Florida chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and several affected families. The committee then considered SB 1430 on post-judgment execution proceedings for terrorism victims, SB 96 on relief for Jacob Rogers, SB 382 on affordable housing rent agreements, SB 4 and SB 6 on claims bills for Patricia Armini and Jose Correa, SB 1142 on release of conservation easements, SB 658 on waiver or release of liens, SB 28 and SB 30 on claims involving South Broward Hospital District and the Broward County Sheriff’s Office, SB 24 on relief for Mandy Penny Lemon, SB 72 on campaign funds for child care expenses, and SB 1622 on recreational customary use of beaches. Most of these bills were explained by their sponsors as narrow relief or technical measures, and the committee heard a mix of support and opposition from claimants, local governments, industry groups, and advocacy organizations. Several bills drew substantive debate. On SB 382, members discussed rent stability and whether the bill should better address lease language and future rent increases; the amendment and bill were both reported favorably. On SB 1142, members raised concerns about environmental and drainage impacts and whether releases of conservation easements should be mandatory or discretionary, but the bill still passed favorably. On SB 72, members questioned the scope of allowable campaign child care expenses and the need for stronger guardrails against abuse; the bill nevertheless passed favorably. On SB 1622, testimony sharply divided between supporters of restoring public beach access and opponents defending private property rights; debate continued when the transcript ended, so no final vote on that bill is reflected here.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education May 6th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill and any versions of it.
  • Nevertheless, this bill will limit or entirely remove these very courses from the core curriculum requirements
  • Neutral on the bill. Thank you.
  • And that's why we oppose this bill.
  • I'm concerned that this bill could limit curriculum choices, censor classroom discussions, and hinder
Bills: SB 37
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Transportation (04/08/2025)

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill House Bill 321?
  • Bill 632? Bill 632?
  • So this bill would limit not only the lives of these people that we've heard from, you know, speak so
  • So this this bill<03:23:01.600> would<03:23:02.200> limit<03:23:03.200> not<03:23
  • would limit not only the lives of bill would limit not only the lives of these<03:23:04.720> people
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

No candidate addresses 3/4/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's what this bill does. Um, the bill affects legislators directly.
  • <00:02:47.760> Um<00:02:48.080> the<00:02:48.319> bill that's what this bill
  • Um the bill that's what this bill does.
  • creating a criminal offense in this bill creating a criminal offense in this bill so<00:21:25.360
  • What are we doing with this bill?
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee took up House File 3363, a bill focused on protecting the privacy and safety of legislators and other candidates by limiting public access to home addresses and related information in campaign finance and election filings. The author said the bill was prompted by the events of June 14 and was intended to make temporary Campaign Finance Board changes permanent. No public testimony was offered, and the author explained that the bill had been narrowed and reorganized after a Senate delete-everything amendment expanded its scope. Members then considered a series of amendments. The A1 amendment, which added security devices and security services as allowable non-campaign disbursements, was adopted after questions about family relationships and whether payments to relatives could qualify. The A2 through A9 amendments were also adopted, covering data classification or redaction of street addresses in Campaign Finance Board reports, lobbyist gift reports, candidate affidavits of candidacy, nominating petitions, local government candidate reports, and retroactive redaction of existing reports. The A4 amendment was modified by A12 to apply city, state, and ZIP code reporting to political committees, political funds, and party units. The A13 amendment removed a proposed misdemeanor penalty tied to disclosure violations, and the A14 amendment was adopted to give caucus and chamber leaders access to actual candidate addresses, though members noted the language still needed refinement and that the intent was to continue working on it. There was discussion about whether the address-access language in A14 would apply to all candidates or only legislative candidates, and whether it would affect residency disputes; staff said it would not change complaint or court processes, but could be a data point. Several members said they had concerns about the breadth of the language but were willing to keep working on it. After the amendments were adopted, the committee moved to the bill as amended and recommended that House File 3363 be re-referred to the Judiciary Committee.
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

Senate in Special Session F Jun 2nd, 2026

Florida Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Where's your bill? Where is your bill? I know that some ideas were Where is your bill?
  • And so this is the bill that's in front of us. Is it a perfect bill? No, it is not a perfect bill.
  • And so this is the bill that's in front of us. Is it a perfect bill? No, it is not a perfect bill.
  • Please read the next bill: Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 4F, a bill to be entitled an act relating
  • Read the bill.
Summary: The Senate took up Committee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 2F, a proposed constitutional amendment to expand homestead property tax relief, lower the assessment cap on non-homestead property from 10% to 5%, and limit county and municipal ad valorem tax revenues to specified uses. Senator Avila presented the measure as a major property tax reform intended to provide relief to homeowners and restrain local government spending, while opponents argued it would shift costs to fees, services, and state appropriations and could harm local budgets, public safety, schools, and other services. Several senators also raised concerns about the ballot language and the lack of a completed fiscal analysis. The chamber considered and rejected multiple amendments. Senator Sharif’s income-based “circuit breaker” amendment failed, as did Senator Smith’s sunset clause amendment and Senator Berman’s amendment to rewrite the ballot statement for greater accuracy. During questioning, Avila said the revised language was meant to preserve flexibility for local governments and that future legislatures could set implementing procedures and, if necessary, prohibit certain local expenditures by general law. He also confirmed that the proposal would not affect refinancing or portability, and said the measure would not prevent local governments from continuing to fund many services such as libraries, parks, animal control, code enforcement, mosquito control, public housing, county health departments, and elections. Debate on final passage was extensive. Supporters described the proposal as overdue relief for homeowners and a way to force local governments to prioritize spending, while critics called it a risky tax shift that could reduce local revenue by billions and force cuts or higher fees. Some senators emphasized concerns about public safety funding, mental health and social services, and the accuracy of the ballot summary; others argued the measure would give voters a chance to decide on property tax reform. After debate, the resolution was rolled over for third reading and the Senate continued discussion, but the transcript provided does not include a final vote on the joint resolution.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Transportation Committee Jul 7th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • on this bill.
  • The remaining bills, 11 bills, I'll read them in order.
  • The bill also limits data... ...audits of public agencies.
  • The bill also limits data retention to 60 days unless linked to an active investigation or included in
  • That bill has 15 votes. That bill has 15 votes. That bill is out of committee. All right.
Summary: The Assembly Transportation Committee heard several measures, beginning with SB 86, which would extend and expand the CAEATFA sales and use tax exclusion program through 2031, raise the annual cap from $100 million to $200 million, and add fusion energy. Supporters, including the State Treasurer and industry and labor representatives, cited billions in clean-tech investment, job creation, and environmental benefits; county groups opposed the bill over local revenue losses. The committee approved SB 86 on a 12-0 roll, holding the roll open for additional members. The committee then heard SB 545, which would require Go-Biz to study economic development opportunities along the California high-speed rail corridor, including land value, development incentives, and public-private partnerships. Labor, Fresno’s mayor’s office, and other stakeholders supported the bill as a way to spur corridor development and future funding opportunities, while one business group moved from opposition to neutral after amendments. The bill passed on a 9-1 vote, with the roll held open. Members next considered SB 63, a Bay Area transit funding measure authorizing a regional revenue measure to support transit operations amid looming fiscal shortfalls. The author and witnesses described severe service cuts that could follow without new funding, while committee members raised concerns about the bill’s structure, county participation, polling, and whether other revenue options should be considered. The bill advanced on a 9-3 vote, with the roll held open, and the committee also approved SB 263, directing a state study of tariff impacts on California’s economy and supply chains, on an 11-0 vote. Finally, the committee heard SB 661, which would redirect aviation-related tax revenues back to airports for aviation purposes and bring the state into compliance with federal requirements; testimony focused on airport modernization, rural access, and allocation formulas, but no final vote was taken in the portion provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 15th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 1527, the Chair offers a committee substitute to House Bill 1527.
  • House Bill 1527.
  • In support of the bill. In support of the bill, yes. Thank you. Sorry.
  • House Bill 4701.
  • It's not a very big bill. It's not a very big bill. Very long bill.
Keywords: 1184, house, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Mar 27th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, members, we will now hear bill layouts. Is that House Bill 1297?
  • So I urge you to support this bill. It's a simple bill.
  • House Bill 376 adds several elements to the plan, including, but not limited to, adding electronic poll
  • Overall, this bill will just limit the amount of time that local governments have to actually prepare
  • on top of bills.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Elections Mar 27th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I urge you to support this bill. It's a simple bill.
  • Support this bill.
  • House Bill 376 adds several elements to the plan, including but not limited to, adding electronic poll
  • Overall, this bill will just limit the amount of time that local governments have to actually prepare
  • Kane to explain the bill. Thank you Chair and Vice Chair, members, House Bill 817, simple bill.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Human Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • is in this bill. is in this bill.
  • in the bill. in the bill.
  • This<01:13:16.640> bill This bill This bill is<01:13:18.880> full<01:13:19.080> of
  • the billing limits that we discussed the billing limits that we discussed but<01:14:53.280> also
  • . bill. bill.
Bills: HF4338
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 01/22/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Bill Weber, Senate District 21.
  • It's, uh, we're limited. We've got a great staff, great partners, but there's a limit.
  • It's, uh, we're limited. We've got a great staff, great partners, but there's a limit.
  • It's, uh, we're limited. We've got a great staff, great partners, but there's a limit.
  • It's, uh, we're limited. We've got a great staff, great partners, but there's a limit.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 50 (3-19-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 504. House Bill 504.
  • House Bill 213, House Bill 220, House Bill 456, and House Bill 622.
  • House Bill 185 and House Bill 312. House Bill 185 and House Bill 312.
  • 220,<01:25:10.760> House House Bill 213, House Bill 220, House House Bill 213, House Bill
  • Bill 456, and House Bill 622. Bill 456, and House Bill 622.
Keywords: 958, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Madam Chair, I've got two bills.
  • And this bill protects them.
  • Can we stick to the merits of the bill? Mr. Gallagher: This is the merit of the bill, Madam Chair.
  • So with that, I'll support the bill, and I would second the bill when you get a quorum.
  • Retention also limits participation. Retention also limits participation.
Summary: The committee heard several bills, with extensive testimony and debate. AB 2507 by Assembly Member Wynn would strengthen state consultation with federally recognized tribal governments by requiring clearer tribal liaison roles, a tribal advisory committee, and more consistent early engagement across agencies. Support came from Wilton Rancheria and the California Tribal Business Alliance, with members praising the bill as improving respect, coordination, and outcomes for tribes. AB 2024, also by Wynn, would require the Outdoor Advertising Act permitting process to reach a determination on submitted applications, aimed at reducing delays and uncertainty; it drew support from the outdoor advertising industry and the California Association of Realtors, with members describing it as a technical cleanup measure. Both bills were later moved to Appropriations, along with a consent calendar of several other measures. AB 1585 by Assembly Member Connolly would require wine labeled as American to be made from 100% American-grown grapes, aligning the federal “American” label with California’s existing 100% state-origin standard. Supporters, including California wine grape growers, family wineries, consumer advocates, and several local agricultural groups, argued the bill would improve truth in labeling and help struggling growers. Opponents from major wine companies and industry groups warned it could reduce flexibility, create labeling complications, and limit the ability to list varietal and vintage on some blended wines. After a lengthy debate over labeling standards, consumer expectations, and impacts on interstate wine sales, the committee passed the bill to Appropriations. AB 1605 by Assembly Member Ransom would allow judges to place a no-alcohol-sales notice on the licenses of repeat or serious DUI offenders, restricting their ability to purchase alcohol as a preventive measure. Supporters, including the California Police Chiefs Association, the Safe California Roads Coalition, and the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, said the bill would give courts another tool to reduce recidivism and save lives. Retailers and restaurant representatives raised concerns about implementation and ID-checking burdens, but the bill was amended and passed to Appropriations. AB 2211 by Assembly Member Hoover, which would allow craft distillers to operate a second tasting room, also advanced with support from the California Distillers Association. Finally, AB 1578 by Assembly Member Jackson, presented by Assembly Member Solache, would require anti-hate speech training for local and state elected officials; it drew strong opposition over First Amendment and definitional concerns, and members pressed for a clearer definition of hate speech before further action.