Transcript Highlights:

• :56.960> were two cases that I'm aware of, both were two cases that I'm aware of, both were mine
• <01:37:00.000> One<01:37:00.159> judge mine, um, in superior court.
• One judge mine, um, in superior court.
• I<01:58:43.760> a<01:58:44.000> concern<01:58:44.239> of<01:58:44.480> mine
• that I couldn't what I a concern of mine that I couldn't get<01:58:45.440> an<01:58:45.679>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, so it's always been an issue of mine that I wanted to get back to um how can I pass some legislation
• Uh, so it's always been an issue of mine that I wanted to get back to um how can I pass some legislation
• Uh, so it's always been an issue of mine that I wanted to get back to um how can I pass some legislation
• <01:30:46.159> She's<01:30:46.400> now kindergarten student of mine.
• She's now kindergarten student of mine.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The task force met with a quorum, approved the minutes from the August 20 meeting, and then heard testimony from Representative Steven Doan on House Bill 439, a school nutrition bill aimed at restricting certain ultra-processed foods in schools. Doan said the bill was inspired by his own health journey and his work in agriculture, and he described the measure as targeting specific chemical additives in foods served during the school day, not concession sales or after-hours activities. He said the bill would phase in later to give schools time to adjust and noted that the list of restricted additives was drawn from efforts in other states and advocacy groups. Members asked about the chemical abstract numbers, fiscal impact, summer meal programs, fundraisers, and whether the bill would affect parent-provided items; Doan said he had not done a fiscal note and explained that the bill was intended to apply only during instructional time on school property. Committee members generally reacted favorably, with some raising practical concerns about cost and implementation. One member asked about high fructose corn syrup, which Doan said was not included because it is too pervasive in the food system. Another member noted that schools already limit some homemade items and asked about the line between school-provided and parent-provided food. Doan also said the list was based in part on Turning Point USA materials and similar laws in other states, and he referenced federal efforts to define ultra-processed foods. The committee then heard from Kentucky Department of Education officials Matt Ross, Lauren Moore, and Katie Embry on school meals and nutrition programs. They outlined Kentucky’s school lunch, breakfast, summer meals, and other USDA child nutrition programs, including participation and reimbursement figures, and explained how community eligibility provision schools, meal patterns, offer-versus-serve, smart snacks, and local wellness policies work. They said USDA and FDA are currently seeking public input on a uniform definition of ultra-processed foods, that there are no current USDA requirements specifically on ultra-processed foods, and that schools already operate under federal and state rules governing competitive foods, including a state time restriction on smart snacks. They also discussed local purchasing, noting its benefits but also the procurement and staffing challenges schools face. No votes or final actions on the bill were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Papovich's community and mine I just, I'm just not sure how we could possibly ever start opening that
• Papovich's community and mine >> This is Representative Cahill.
• Papovich's community and mine >> Well, I believe there was sympathy but no money. >> Other words, ITL
• Papovich's community and mine could do it cheaper. We know how that could do it cheaper.
• Papovichi's community and mine, and 30 others, and I agree there are probably a few more that didn't

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee began its first meeting on retained education funding bills, focusing on HB 366, which concerns school building aid for eligible projects, and HB 295, which would make school building aid program funds non-lapsing. The chair framed the discussion around broader questions about how school building aid should work, noting the state’s limited available funding, the existing debt service obligations, and whether the current formula should continue or be changed. He also raised concerns about the state’s overall revenue constraints and the need to consider renovation, new construction, and possibly leasing within any future program. Members and the Department of Education representative discussed whether school building aid is a state or local responsibility, the current backlog of projects, and the condition of school facilities statewide. Tim Carney of the Bureau of School Facilities described his background and answered technical questions about current programs. Representative Luno argued that under the ConVal decision the state has responsibility for school buildings, including construction and renovation, and that the program also serves an equity function by helping districts with less property-tax capacity. Representative Papich urged the committee to focus on policy structure and fairness rather than just available dollars, saying the current system creates winners and losers and suggesting a simpler per-capita or similar allocation model, while acknowledging a possible transition for projects already in the pipeline. The discussion also covered CTE facilities and leasing. Carney explained that charter schools, and possibly CTE centers, can receive limited leasing aid, and that CTE capital requests are funded through a state capital process, while federal Carl Perkins funds cannot be used for construction. He and others described a separate rotational funding approach for CTE centers, but several members said that model can leave programs waiting too long and may not match changing workforce needs. The chair and others noted that a report from a related study group on CTE policy and funding was still pending, and that its absence could affect legislation for FY28. No votes were taken and no bill was acted on in the portion of the meeting provided; the discussion ended with interest in modeling alternatives, reviewing the waiting list, and examining the tradeoffs of reducing upfront state aid versus funding more projects overall.

Transcript Highlights:

• Oh, I'd turn mine on, and then I'd turn it off, but the turn.
• legal theory really came about as I was studying this back in the 1960s. with the Pennsylvania coal mines
• some lawsuits because I think all of us here would have a problem if our house suddenly had a coal mine
• Put it put it toward another area is a concern of mine and and as we as state look for a solution here
• I think mine was like 26 bucks a year, it was the best $26 I ever spent.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• management activities like reclamation research and evaluation to make science-based decisions related to mining
• We all have had conversations about mining and critical minerals, and the need for those, and we see
• 14.599> about and we all have had conversations about and we all have had conversations about Mining
• > critical<00:49:16.240> minerals<00:49:16.920> and<00:49:17.040> the Mining
• and critical minerals and the Mining and critical minerals and the need<00:49:17.400> for<00:

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that caused this crop damage; it was company C over here," and company C might say, "Oh no, it wasn't mine
• say oh no over here the company C might say oh no it<03:33:20.640> wasn't<03:33:21.000> mine
• <03:33:21.520> mine<03:33:21.760> didn't<03:33:21.960> get<03:33:22.120>
• over it wasn't mine mine didn't get over it wasn't mine mine didn't get over there<03:33:22.960><

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ; they could be receiving fraud data mining requests as well.
• ; they could be receiving fraud data mining requests as well.
• they could be commercial data mining they could be receiving<02:15:41.520> fraud<02:15:42.800
• fraud data mining requests as receiving fraud data mining requests as well<02:15:45.440> and<
• So, I wanted to just share a couple of real-life experiences, and I wish I had more time to mine my own

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Jim Hill is a mentor of mine. Jim Hill is wrong on this bill.
• Jim Hill is a mentor of mine. Jim Hill is wrong on this bill.
• Jim Hill is a mentor of mine. Jim Hill is wrong on this bill.
• Hey, I got a butt of mine same thing.
• <06:21:25.280> I and off pretty mining changes. I and off pretty mining changes.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• He is a pastor of mine in Christ Morset. He is a pastor of mine in Christ Morset.
• He is a pastor of mine in Christ International Church in Alabaster and is International Church in Alabaster
• When I mine just to work along with him. When I mine just to work along with him.
• . district like it does mine. district like it does mine.
• and and ma'am neighborhood but in mine and and ma'am neighborhood but in mine and and ma'am you are

Bills: HB 1500, HJR 7, HJR 112, HB 34, HB 133, HB 112, HB 119, HB 128, HB 130, HB 132, HB 2756, HB 166, HB 406, HB 186, HB 271, HB 331, HB 380, HB 1583, HB 1584, HB 1819, HB 621, HB 303, HB 552, HB 366, HB 463, HB 1211, HB 1327, HB 1461, HB 923, HB 1760, HB 2043, HB 2467, HB 5333, HB 5265, HB 1592, HB 1576, HB 1552, HB 2018, HB 3511, HB 1781, HB 2013, HB 2340, HB 2349, HB 2508, HB 2970, HB 2520, HB 865, HB 2851, HB 3385, HB 3336, HB 3529, HB 3309, HB 1127, HB 1232, HB 1397, HB 4236, HB 1804, HB 1926, HB 4041, HB 1965, HB 1964, HB 2679, HB 2730, HB 3698, HB 3699, HCR 77, HB 3354, HB 163, HB 201, HB 272, HB 333, HB 405, HB 519, HB 569, HB 654, HB 694, HB 791, HB 1006, HB 1136, HB 1240, HB 1266, HB 1275, HB 1437, HB 1532, HB 1675, HB 1842, HB 1868, HB 1888, HB 1894, HB 1943, HB 1990, HB 2029, HB 2061, HB 2286, HB 2523, HB 2622, HB 2626, HB 2652, HB 2692, HB 2842, HB 2885, HB 2914, HB 3016, HB 3096, HB 3129, HB 3248, HB 3251, HB 3255, HB 3479, HB 3611, HB 3623, HB 3701, HB 3724, HB 3803, HB 3804, HB 3805, HB 3806, HB 3810, HB 3816, HB 3832, HB 3887, HB 4127, HB 4129, HB 4130, HB 4131, HB 4163, HB 4187, HB 4229, HB 4238, HB 4454, HB 4588, HB 4643, HB 4736, HB 4738, HB 4739, HB 4945, HB 5015, HB 5616, SB 767, SB 1619, SB 1738, HJR 5, HJR 2, HB 1399, HB 388, HB 114, HB 205, HB 2789, HB 2791, HB 499, HB 2960, HB 3163, HB 3135, HB 2427, HB 1672, HB 1722, HB 2618, HB 879, HB 1126, HB 4134, HB 3513, HB 1445, HB 1893, HB 1734, HB 3229, HB 3306, HB 1276, HB 3516, HB 4145, HB 1585, HB 4810, HB 2558, HB 2742, HB 1695, HB 33, HB 144, HB 109, HB 103, HB 148, HB 3809, HB 2217, HB 220, HB 2421, HB 2363, HB 421, HB 2455, HB 3711, HB 2559, HB 2775, HB 3126, HB 3666, HB 3595, HB 3260, HB 3376, HB 3826, HB 3770, HB 1831, HB 2614, HB 3113, HB 322, HB 431, HB 869, HB 1203, HB 1244, HB 1875, HB 1950, HB 2152, HB 2341, HB 2809, HB 2856, HB 3012, SB 1415, SB 1058, SB 487, SB 1499, SB 513, SB 1697, SB 1197, SB 1437, SB 1809, SB 836, SB 1879, SB 1145, SB 963, SB 1038, SB 1147, SB 914, SB 711, SB 1409, HB 3707, HB 589, HB 1360, HB 2337, HB 2391, HB 718, HB 23, HB 2436, HB 1500, HJR 7, HJR 112, HB 34, HB 133, HB 112, HB 119, HB 128, HB 130, HB 132, HB 2756, HB 166, HB 406, HB 186, HB 271, HB 331, HB 380, HB 1583, HB 1584, HB 1819, HB 621, HB 303, HB 552, HB 366, HB 463, HB 1211, HB 1327, HB 1461, HB 923, HB 1760, HB 2043, HB 2467, HB 5333, HB 5265, HB 1592, HB 1576, HB 1552, HB 2018, HB 3511, HB 1781, HB 2013, HB 2340, HB 2349, HB 2508, HB 2970, HB 2520, HB 865, HB 2851, HB 3385, HB 3336, HB 3529, HB 3309, HB 1127, HB 1232, HB 1397, HB 4236, HB 1804, HB 1926, HB 4041, HB 1965, HB 1964, HB 2679, HB 2730, HB 3698, HB 3699, HB 3354, HB 163, HB 201, HB 272, HB 333, HB 405, HB 519, HB 569, HB 654, HB 694, HB 791, HB 1006, HB 1136, HB 1240, HB 1266, HB 1275, HB 1437, HB 1532, HB 1675, HB 1842, HB 1868, HB 1888, HB 1894, HB 1943, HB 1990, HB 2029, HB 2061, HB 2286, HB 2523, HB 2622, HB 2626, HB 2652, HB 2692, HB 2842, HB 2885, HB 2914, HB 3016, HB 3096, HB 3129, HB 3248, HB 3251, HB 3255, HB 3479, HB 3611, HB 3623, HB 3701, HB 3724, HB 3803, HB 3804, HB 3805, HB 3806, HB 3810, HB 3816, HB 3832, HB 3887, HB 4127, HB 4129, HB 4130, HB 4131, HB 4163, HB 4187, HB 4229, HB 4238, HB 4454, HB 4588, HB 4643, HB 4736, HB 4738, HB 4739, HB 4945, HB 5015, HB 5616, SB 767, SB 1619, SB 1738, HCR 77

Keywords: Information Resources, Department governance, cybersecurity, state assistance, procurement training, technology resources, advisory committees, water fund, Texas water supply, constitutional amendment, state revenue, infrastructure, parental rights, child upbringing, government interference, Texas legislation, science park district, economic development, technology innovation, higher education collaboration

Transcript Highlights:

• So that would be one concern of mine.
• So that would be one concern of mine.
• So that would be one concern of mine.
• So that would be one concern of mine.
• the public comments received are mine the public comments received are mine and<05:28:06.320>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We can't mine as it is; it takes 29 years in only case to build a copper mine in this country.
• We can't mine as it is; it takes 29 years in only case to build a copper mine in this country.
• We can't mine as it is; it takes 29 years in only case to build a copper mine in this country.
• We can't mine as it is; it takes 29 years in only case to build a copper mine in this country.
• We can't mine as it is; it takes 29 years in only case to build a copper mine in this country.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, January 14, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We talk about a lot when we're building new schools, so this is a big interest of mine as well.
• <00:36:20.560> well<00:36:20.920> thank<00:36:21.160> you big interest of mine
• as well thank you big interest of mine as well thank you thank<00:36:22.319> you<00:36:22.560
• My question, having served on a zoning board, is: do you see this affecting the towns, like mine, that
• My question, having served on a zoning board, is: do you see this affecting the towns, like mine, that

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And it just so happens to fall on a date when the journal reflects a bill of mine dying on thirds.

Keywords: 981, all

Summary: The House convened, the Pledge of Allegiance was led, and a roll call established a quorum with 51 members present and 14 excused. The journal for Thursday, April 2, 2026, was approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk after a voice vote, with the motion adopted despite some lighthearted remarks from members. Members then announced committee meetings and schedules for later in the day. Appropriations was set to meet in the old state library and lay over House Bill 1365 until the next day. House Finance announced it would hear Senate Bill 128, House Bill 1225, and House Bill 1117 in room 112. House Agriculture, Water, and Natural Resources announced it would hear Senate Bill 122 and Senate Bill 121. The State Civic Veterans Military Affairs Committee announced it would hear Senate Bill 48 and HCR 1001. Several members also made personal announcements, including requests to be excused and notice of a Bible study in room 109. Representative Phillips jokingly noted a Kit Kat placed on the Speaker’s desk. At the end of the session, the Majority Leader moved to lay over the balance of the calendar until Tuesday, April 7, 2026, and then moved that the House stand in recess until later that day; both motions were adopted without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• Other than mine, just very good, Madam Chair. Do you mind? I've got a couple of things. Yes.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . words, not mine.
• That's their word, not mine.
• <03:58:37.720> mine<03:58:38.080> in<03:58:38.200> particular, community, mine
• mine in particular, community, mine mine in particular, and<03:58:40.280> also<03:58:40.600><
• I have watched a family member of mine struggle for 15 years with it.

Keywords: 981, all

Summary: The House convened with a quorum, approved the journal, and heard several announcements and recognitions. Members marked World Ovarian Cancer Day, promoted Cinco de Mayo and a related potluck, welcomed DeMolay International guests, and recognized correctional officers and employees during Corrections Officers and Employees Week. Several committees also announced upcoming meetings and bill hearings, including Health and Human Services, Judiciary, Transportation, Housing, and Local Government, Capital Development, and Appropriations. Committee reports were read, including favorable recommendations on several bills and a postponement indefinitely of House Joint Resolution 1029. The Majority Leader then moved a slate of bills to special orders, and the House agreed without objection. The chamber then proceeded to floor consideration of Senate Bill 134, concerning payment card network fees. Senate Bill 134 drew debate over whether merchants should continue paying swipe fees on the tax portion of credit card transactions. Supporters said the bill would provide meaningful relief to small businesses and restaurants, with estimated savings of $8,000 to $10,000 per business and about $217 million statewide. Opponents argued the bill shifted costs to banks and could have unintended consequences, suggesting the state should instead directly pay or reimburse the fees. After debate, the House passed Senate Bill 134 by voice vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• , produced, or manufactured in mined, produced, or manufactured in Shing<04:15:18.479> Jang.
• organizations that import products mined organizations that import products mined or<04:17:54.000
• It's not fair that in our states, like mine and yours, Mike, and other Democratic states, that we are
• ><08:39:32.160> our<08:39:32.478> states,<08:39:32.878> like<08:39:33.280> mine
• in our states, like mine and yours, Mike,<08:39:34.398> and<08:39:34.558> other<08:39:

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Monday, May 5, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• He's a good friend of mine and my husband's.
• /c><02:13:08.280> this<02:13:08.440> friend<02:13:08.639> of<02:13:08.760> mine
• years ago I was uh this friend of mine years ago I was uh this friend of mine or<02:13:09.119>
• or what I thought was a friend of mine or what I thought was a friend of mine knocked<02:13:10.840
• Not the mine have two pink sheets on... Oh, that packet's not mine. Okay, I see that now.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 146, which would require longer retention and quicker disclosure of certain video recordings from traffic stops and similar motor vehicle violations when a citation is disputed. The prime sponsor described the bill as a response to a constituent who challenged a speeding ticket but could not obtain a cruiser video before it was deleted under the current 30-day retention practice. Supporters argued the bill is about fairness and access to potentially exculpatory evidence, and one member suggested a simple 60-day retention period might avoid confusion over different timelines. The sponsor also noted that the bill would not affect criminal cases and that victims and complainants should have access to the same evidence as law enforcement when a recording is relevant to a defense. Major Brendan Davey of the New Hampshire State Police testified in opposition. He said the proposal would create a different discovery standard for one type of evidence, could discourage agencies from adopting body-worn or cruiser cameras, and would add cost and administrative burden. He explained that the State Police already retain routine traffic-stop videos for at least 30 days, but keep videos much longer when complaints or possible litigation are involved, and said the current system balances efficiency with accountability. He also argued the underlying speeding case did not make the trooper video directly material to the citation, though he acknowledged the legislature could choose a longer blanket retention period if it wished. No vote was taken during the hearing. The committee then opened a public hearing on House Bill 638, which would allow people serving life without parole sentences to become eligible for a parole hearing at age 60 after serving at least 18 years, provided they have had no major conduct violations in the prior 10 years. The sponsor said the bill is intended to give a narrow second look to a small number of elderly prisoners, citing the high cost of incarceration and the health challenges of aging in prison. He emphasized that the bill would not automatically release anyone, would not apply to capital murder convictions under RSA 630:1, and would still allow victims to participate in the parole process. Testimony on HB 638 was mixed. Alexander Bailey, a survivor of violent crime and domestic violence advocate, supported the bill, saying many survivors favor rehabilitation, second chances, and restorative justice, and that people in prison often age faster and face serious health and safety problems. Another supporter, Russell Roy, began offering a personal story about crime, addiction, and violence in Concord, but the transcript cuts off before his full remarks. Committee members asked about why age 60 was chosen, how released individuals would support themselves, and whether victims or families would be consulted; the sponsor said 60 was meant to limit eligibility and reflect the health realities of prison, and that parole boards already consider support networks and victim input. No action or vote was taken in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Over the weekend, I lost a supporter of mine who was also a very good friend.
• Lost a supporter of mine, who was also a very good friend. It was Gerlindy Lancelotti.
• that space, I would vote for you and your family to continue in that space that you would vote for mine
• that space, I would vote for you and your family to continue in that space that you would vote for mine
• Is that mine? Oh, yeah.

Keywords: 1064, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's always been a consistent position of mine that we should give law enforcement the resources that
• to assume the federal responsibility of immigration enforcement, which terrorizes communities like mine
• Public safety matters, but it is only strengthened when communities like mine trust law enforcement and
• That is what makes communities like mine safer.
• meet everybody where they are and fix something if you assume there's something wrong with a bill of mine

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It's always been a consistent position of mine that we should give law enforcement the resources that
• to assume the federal responsibility of immigration enforcement, which terrorizes communities like mine
• But it is only strengthened when communities like mine trust law enforcement and feel comfortable reporting
• That is what makes communities like mine safer.
• meet everybody where they are and fix something if you assume there's something wrong with a bill of mine

Summary: The House convened, opened with prayer and the Pledge, approved the journal, and welcomed several guests in the gallery, including a high school student and an advocate connected to the domestic violence bill HB 2995. The chamber then moved through multiple Committee of the Whole calendars, first advancing HB 4155, HB 4156, and HB 4157, then HB 4164, HB 4165, and HB 4166, all with do-pass recommendations and no substantive amendments on those calendars. Later, the House also considered SB 1326, a victims’ rights measure, adopted a floor amendment, and reported it out as amended. The House corrected an earlier clerical error regarding HB 4155-4157 being referred to engrossing rather than third reading. The House then took up a long series of final passage votes on Senate bills. SB 2174, SB 2611, SB 1011, SB 1012, SB 1016, SB 1018, SB 1038, SB 1039, SB 1040, SB 1053, SB 1055, SB 1057, SB 1060, SB 1061, SB 1068, SB 1069, SB 1075, SB 1100, SB 1113 on reconsideration, SB 1160, and SB 1170 all passed. SB 2873, SB 1004, SB 1009, SB 1042, SB 1043, SB 1049, SB 1093, and SB 1143 failed. SB 2995, the emergency family-law/domestic-violence bill known as the Alec and Lydia Act, passed with the required two-thirds vote after extensive debate; supporters said it would better protect children and clarify judicial standards, while opponents argued its definitions were overly broad and could harm families. SB 1018 on foreign laws also drew extended debate over Sharia law, with supporters framing it as a defense of American values and opponents calling it unnecessary and discriminatory. Several votes included explanations focused on policy concerns. SB 1004 on sex-offender registration and monitoring drew debate over whether electronic monitoring is effective. SB 1040 on voter registration transparency prompted arguments over public access to voter rolls versus privacy and security. SB 1118 on municipal zoning and historical homes was debated as a property-rights and local-control issue, with supporters saying it could help preserve affordable housing and opponents warning it would override local decisions. The House also adopted motions to reconsider prior actions on SB 1043 and SB 1100, and it requested the Senate return SB 1552 for reconsideration. The session ended with the House still processing additional Committee of the Whole business, including HB 4158, HB 4159, HB 4160, HB 4161, HB 4162, and HB 4163, with HB 4162 and HB 4163 receiving floor amendments and do-pass recommendations.