Video & Transcript Research : 'Committee on Alabama Monument Protection'

Page 122 of 500
NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Commerce and Consumer Affairs Orientation Meeting 1/12/21

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Justice and Public Safety Orientation 1/12/21

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Means Orientation Meeting 1/12/21

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Children and Family Law Orientation Meeting 1/11/21

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Rules (12/16/20)

Rules

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Means with Senate Ways and Means (11/23/20)

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Rules (6/3/20)

Rules

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary : Executive Session (5/28/20)

Judiciary

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Means - Revenue Estimates (5/27/20 - morning session)

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Means - Revenue Estimates (5/27/20 - morning session)

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Means - Revenue Estimates (5/27/20 - afternoon session)

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Means - Revenue Estimates (5/27/20 - afternoon session)

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Ways and Mean : Work Session and Revenue Estimates (5/20/20)

NH
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary : Work Session (5/19/20)

Judiciary

HI
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Schools Working Group Info Briefing (SCHWG) Sep 29th, 2023

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

KY
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Lottery Trust Fund Task Force (8-3-23)

NM
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Jun 26th, 2025

Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, the Data Infrastructure and Analysis Committee, helping us on the childcare supply and demand and
  • This is on if they're vulnerable on one or more developmental domain.
  • One of them is on page 72.
  • So in the CLASS and the MEFS, if you have done like one-on-ones for folks with the—I think it would be
  • Anyone on Zoom? Staff: No, no one on Zoom. Chair: Oh, we caught up.
KY
KY

Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

Artificial Intelligence Task Force 2025 (6-26-25)

Transcript Highlights:
  • I came before a committee years ago to talk about the Chamber's position on a patchwork of laws related
  • I came before a committee years ago to talk about the Chamber's position on a patchwork of laws related
  • And we'd like to thank you, the committee, for providing us the opportunity to provide an update on the
  • Lastly, after collaboration with other states on similar journeys and our extensive vendor committee
  • your network as outside the firewall or on your network and you have to protect against both equally
Keywords: Meeting Start - 00:00 Roll Call – 00:34 KY Chamber of Commerce KY Business Perspectives – 01:50 COT Update on SB4 – 27:16 Adjournment – 48:18, 958, all
Summary: The 2025 Artificial Intelligence Task Force met for its first meeting of the year and heard updates on federal AI policy, state implementation of Senate Bill 4, and the business community’s perspective on AI regulation. Co-chairs noted that federal legislation could affect the task force’s work later in the year, but said Kentucky still has significant issues to study, including energy, land use, education, social media, and children’s engagement with AI. The task force had quorum and no votes were taken. Kate Shanks of the Kentucky Chamber said the business community supports continued discussion but favors a federal approach over a patchwork of state laws. She described the Trump administration’s new AI executive order as emphasizing innovation over regulation, noted the pending federal AI action plan, and discussed congressional action including the Take It Down Act and industry-specific changes to existing laws. She warned that state-by-state AI rules could increase costs and burden businesses, and said the Chamber would prefer incremental, flexible policy that avoids conflict with existing law and limits private rights of action. Members asked about uniform model legislation, education uses of AI, and civil liability; Shanks said a model approach could help avoid fragmentation and that liability should generally be handled through consumer-protection-style enforcement rather than broad litigation. The Commonwealth Office of Technology then reported on implementation of SB 4, saying it has worked with industry, agencies, other states, and vendors to build an AI policy framework now in final review. Officials said an AI Governance Committee has been established and will meet in July, and a draft RFP is being prepared to meet the bill’s tracking and documentation requirements. They said no major implementation challenges have been identified so far, but the impact of pending federal rules remains uncertain. Members also discussed the need to educate students and teachers about AI, with one member emphasizing that schools should teach both how to use AI and how to think critically about information online.
KY
KY

Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

House Standing Committee on Health Services (3-14-25) -Upon Recess of House - 6PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • The seventh meeting of the House Standing Committee on Health Services, on March 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m
  • What we have before us is a committee substitute on Senate Bill 153. Everyone should have that.
  • This provision on the protections will sunset after one year.
  • <00:03:14.959> will provision on the um the protections will provision on the um the protections
  • <00:08:50.600> on<00:08:51.160> page um on on page um on on page four<00:08:53.399>
Keywords: 00:25 Call to Order/Roll Call 01:36 Discussion of 25RS SB 153 23:11 Roll Call Vote on 25RS SB 153 30:56 Adjournment, 958, all
Summary: The House Standing Committee on Health Services met on March 14, 2025, and took up a committee substitute for Senate Bill 153. The substitute deleted the original bill language and replaced it with provisions from Senate Bill 14, aimed at prohibiting pharmaceutical manufacturers from discriminating against 340B covered entities and adding reporting requirements for those entities. The sponsor explained that the protections would sunset after one year, allowing lawmakers to review data by July 1, 2026, and that Kentucky would continue to follow any future federal changes to the 340B program. Members asked several questions about the scope of the reporting, including what “total operating cost” means, how duplicate discounts are prevented, whether the reporting applies only to hospitals and not federally qualified health centers, and who would receive the data. The sponsor said the reporting is intended to help the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and the Office of Health Data Analytics at LRC assess how the program is working, including charity care and community benefits, while preserving protections for rural hospitals and allowing them to continue using contract pharmacies. A representative from LRC confirmed the data would come to the General Assembly through the Office of Health Data Analytics. The committee expressed mixed views about the balance between transparency and potential burdens on hospitals, especially rural facilities. Several members said they were supportive but had reservations about the reporting requirements and the sunset structure, while others noted concerns about unintended consequences and the possibility of changes on the House floor. The committee ultimately adopted the committee substitute, approved a title amendment, and reported Senate Bill 153 with House Committee Substitute 2 favorably. The meeting then adjourned.
KY
KY

Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

Investments in IT Improvements & Modernization Projects Oversight Board (01-21-25)

Transcript Highlights:
  • the on the and then what was it could on the on the and then what was it on<00:05:30.960> on<
  • :05:31.639> the<00:05:31.800> application on on yeah this is on the application on on yeah
  • Yeah, on a...
  • Yeah, on a...
  • Yeah, on a...
Keywords: Meeting start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:12 Discussion on 2025 Regular Session Proposals 00:01:00 Discussion for Future Meetings 00:18:25, 958, all
Summary: The Investments in IT Improvements and Modernization Projects Oversight Board met for its first meeting, approved the minutes from November 13, 2024, and then discussed BR 355, a bill draft intended to revise and clarify the board’s governing statute based on its first year of experience. The draft would rename the body as the Information Technology Oversight Committee, add or refine definitions for cybersecurity projects/systems and legacy projects/systems, move the annual submission deadline earlier, and require a six-year outline and funding-source information for transition planning. Members and staff said the bill was largely a codification of current practice, with no major controversy. State Budget Director John Hicks and CIO Jim Baird offered technical comments and suggested several drafting changes: using “system” instead of “project” for legacy and cybersecurity references, adjusting the first reporting deadline to give agencies more time if the bill becomes law in March, and clarifying that the statute should ask agencies for estimated expenditures and funding sources rather than implying an electronic link to the budget request. They also suggested that the linkage to the budget process could be handled through budget instructions rather than statute. Members discussed whether the six-year outline should be biennial and agreed that the April timing fit the capital planning process. After the discussion, the board agreed in principle to revise the draft along those lines, including changing the terminology, making the six-year outline biennial, and refining the budget-related language. The board also discussed future meeting dates and agreed to meet on Fridays upon adjournment, with February and March meetings to be scheduled later. The meeting ended with a motion and second to adjourn, which passed.