Transcript Highlights:

• Sections 15-742 and 15-743. It was relating to school assessment accountability.
• House Bill 233, an act amending section 17-41, relating to school assessment accountability.
• House Bill 2093, an act amending section 15-701.03, relating to school curricula. House Bill 293.
• House Bill 2093, an act amending section 15-701.03, relating to school curricula. House Bill 293.
• House Bill 2093, an act amending section 15-701.03, relating to school curricula.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There are very minor changes to simplify and clarify this section.
• Director Cameron, on page 102, Section 030, Minimum Standards for Benefits, that continues on to page
• I am, of course, here to discuss House Bill 563, but just one small section of it.
• I'm, of course, here to discuss House Bill 563, but just one small section of it.
• words in Code Section 54-209: "Part 2, performed under the supervision of and verified by an active

Summary: The committee first took up a series of Idaho Department of Insurance rule dockets, all presented by Director Dean Cameron as part of a five-year negotiated rule review. The rules covered self-funded health care plans for government entities, joint public agency self-funded plans, long-term care insurance, small employer and individual health insurance availability, coordination of benefits, short-term health plans, and managing general agents. Cameron repeatedly said the changes were mostly clarifications, deletions of duplicative statutory language, and reduced filing burdens, with a few notable policy points including Medicare coordination for seniors, adding generic prescription coverage language, and revising short-term plan rules to allow both traditional and enhanced plans through the end of the calendar year. The committee asked several questions, but no opposition was raised, and each docket was approved by motion. For the short-term plan docket, the committee also approved making the pending rule effective on the Legislature’s 2026 sine die date to avoid a gap after the temporary rule expires. The committee then heard House Bill 563 from Representative Jeff Ehlers, which would change CPA licensure requirements in Idaho. Ehlers said the bill is intended to address a CPA shortage by creating additional pathways to licensure: a bachelor’s degree plus the CPA exam and two years of supervised experience, or a master’s degree/150 hours with the existing experience requirements. He also said the bill would expand reciprocity for out-of-state CPAs in good standing. During questioning, members explored whether the bill lowered barriers too much, whether Idaho-specific knowledge was needed, and whether the residency language for taking the exam should be removed. Public testimony included support from Ken McClure of the Idaho Society of CPAs, who said the bill reflects a national model and that supervised experience is a quality-control measure that can be satisfied through peer or mentor arrangements, not just direct employment. Rachel Misnick, a state employee, testified in opposition to one supervision phrase, saying it could make it harder for government accountants without access to an active CPA supervisor to qualify. Laura Lance, executive director of the Idaho Society of CPAs, supported the bill and said it adds flexibility for candidates with different learning styles and helps rural areas where supervision is harder to find. The committee ultimately voted to send House Bill 563 to the floor with a do-pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• So right off the first is page one, section one. It talks about the purpose.
• Okay, the next section is we go and start doing definitions. And so that's section two.
• Next one, under Section 3, where we talk about the state participation in the compact.
• All right, next section. Section 4, we talk about the compact privileges.
• That is on Section 9, labeled data system, page 14, starting at line 39.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Commerce Committee began by welcoming new page Hayden Carter and recognizing outgoing pages Amanda Olson and Cooper, who each spoke about their experiences and were thanked with gifts and letters of recommendation. The chair praised the pages as examples of Idaho’s future. The committee then took up Senate Bill 1284, the Dietitian Compact, with Senator Cook explaining that it would allow Idaho dietitians to practice more easily across state lines while preserving Idaho’s licensing authority. Several dietitians testified in support, citing improved access to care, continuity for rural and border-area patients, and reduced duplicate licensing burdens. Some senators raised concerns about compact authority, data sharing, fingerprinting, and whether reciprocity would be preferable. After discussion, the committee voted 4-5 and the motion to send the bill to the floor with a due pass recommendation failed, so the bill was held in committee. The committee next considered Senate Bill 1285, which would clarify that homeschool diplomas satisfy education requirements for occupational licensure. Senator Taves said the bill arose from cases where homeschool graduates were denied licenses despite meeting testing and other requirements, and witnesses from Idaho Family Policy Center and Homeschool Idaho supported the measure as a fix for what they described as unnecessary barriers. Members discussed broadening the language to “non-public” schools, making the bill effective immediately, and lowering an age reference from 21 to 18. The committee voted to send the bill to the 14th order for possible amendment rather than directly to the floor. House Bill 512, sponsored by Senator Guthrie, would reinstate an open-book Idaho law exam for professional land surveyors. Guthrie and surveyor witnesses said the exam helps ensure surveyors understand Idaho-specific property and boundary law, protects property owners, and reduces disputes and litigation. Testimony emphasized that surveying is quasi-judicial and that Idaho’s rules differ from other states. The committee approved the bill on a due pass motion and sent it to the floor. Finally, the committee heard a gubernatorial reappointment of Trent Nate to the Idaho Health Insurance Exchange Board; members spoke favorably of his experience, and the chair said the committee would likely vote on the appointment at a later meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• It just does it adds, it renames the current code section after Senator Vivian Figures, who sponsored
• It just renames the current code section after Senator Vivian Figures, who sponsored the initial version
• </c><00:16:20.000><c> The</c><00:16:20.240><c> minimum</c><00:16:20.639><c> reimbursement</c> section
• The minimum reimbursement section two.
• </c><00:16:27.199><c> 2A</c> in paragraph B section 2A in paragraph B section 2A shall<00:16:29.279><

Bills: SB9, HB400, SB9, HB400

Keywords: Alabama Athletic Commission, Attorney General, criminal penalties, unarmed combat, regulation, boxing, mixed martial arts, civil fines, dental insurance, benefit rollover, healthcare, insurance policy, annual maximum, smoking ban, vaping, public health, indoor air quality, clean air, ambulance services, health insurance

Transcript Highlights:

• The substitute just changes a section of the title code.
• House Bill 15 is simply a technical change to section… It's simply a technical change to section 12-1256
• What we did when we ran the original bill over in section... section 15530, there is the authority for
• 13A-5D-40 or murder pursuant to section 13A-5D-40 or murder pursuant to section 13A-6-2 may not be..
• Somebody could they be charged with murder under that, under that A2 sections?

Bills: HB105, HB296, HB15, HB264, HB34, HB304, HB146, HB26, HB15, HB34, HB26

Keywords: law enforcement, retirement benefits, Alabama Peace Officers, agency-issued badge, agency-issued pistol, resisting arrest, custody, public safety, Alabama law, traffic infractions, traffic ticket, disposition, criminal contempt, vessel registration, boating fees, state funds, regulatory changes, water safety, compliance, false information

Transcript Highlights:

• But first, I want to provide, as I mentioned, a brief overview of the bar article 5 sections Section
• The sections were paid for entirely by voluntary dues and organized by legal practice area since sections
• Rewriting Florida's Probate Code Section can along Thursday of on 30 section can in this case, the reptiles
• Article 5 Section 15 in the case. Law of the U.S. Constitution. Article 5 Section 15 in the case.
• There's a whole there's a up all part of the website that has a English section Spanish section and we're

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 530 is not a Minnesota law.
• </c><01:19:29.880><c> 530</c> I actually learned about section 530 I actually learned about section 530
• </c> Many of the tax implications of section Many of the tax implications of section 530 530 530 530<
• </c><01:21:05.960><c> 290.19</c> of the IRS section 290.19 of the IRS section 290.19 to<01:21:08.160>
• </c><01:25:53.040><c> 530</c> workforce simply because as Section 530 workforce simply because as Section

Bills: HF4234, HF3697, HF1183, HF4738

Keywords: HF4234, Minnesota private activity bonds, tax-exempt bonds, bond cap, aggregate bond limitation, residential rental projects, multifamily housing, affordable housing finance, housing bonds, public finance, bond allocation, private activity bond cap, Minnesota Statutes 474A.02, tax committee, tax refund, Minnesota Statutes, time limit, claims, tax overpayment, taxation

Transcript Highlights:

• So section two and section three would be deleted in the amendment.
• two and section bill uh so uh section two and section three<00:53:20.880><c> would</c><00:53:21.119>
• </c> remove sections remove sections uh<00:54:03.200><c> two</c><00:54:03.480><c> and</c> uh two and
• </c><00:58:21.359><c> it</c> language 97 a157 the entire section it language 97 a157 the entire section
• five<01:22:58.760><c> section</c> five section five section three<01:23:01.520><c> I'm</c><01:23:01.800

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• But it has to do with Section 213B about a court or something.
• We are in support of Section 2. We just have a few concerns about subsections A and B.
• Impacted stakeholders, but I'm just trying to find that section right now.
• It's regarding Section 6.
• We don't want to give them off too easy, but this is just again on Section 5.

Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 1544, which would require DCYF to study and improve the risk assessment tool used in child abuse and neglect investigations, including better identifying family strengths and needs, substance use-related risk, and service needs, and to certify the tool every three years. Staff explained the bill and noted it had passed the committee unanimously in substitute form last year. The prime sponsor, Representative Rule, said the tool would help reduce bias and support better decisions about child safety. Members raised questions about whether the bill would require new data systems or create a fiscal impact, and DCYF testified that the recertification process would focus on evidence-based literature and fidelity to the tool, though the agency acknowledged limitations in its data system. Support testimony from Partners for Our Children and DCYF emphasized that the current tool is not evidence-based and that the department is piloting the North Carolina Family Assessment Scale. The hearing on HB 1544 was then closed. The committee then received a lengthy work session from DCYF on juvenile rehabilitation. Juvenile Rehabilitation Assistant Secretary Jennifer Redman and security classification administrator Jeff Endermark described a growing JR population that is older, serving more adult-sentence youth, and projected to rise to about 481 by 2031. They said Green Hill School remains crowded, Harbor Heights is being brought online as a short-term option, and Echo Glen is near safe operational capacity. They explained JR’s classification system, behavior management process, and the role of multidisciplinary teams in placement decisions, as well as the expansion of community transition services (CTS), which uses electronic home monitoring for eligible youth. Staff described CTS eligibility, supervision expectations, and examples of successful placements, but also said the program needs more after-hours staffing and community supports. Members questioned the validity and equity of the risk tools, the availability of community resources, the impact of behavior policies and escapes, the use of single bunking, and broader concerns about lawsuits and sexual abuse in the system. JR reported an escape rate increase from 1.78 per 100 youth in 2001 to 3.92 in 2025 and said additional capacity and staffing are still needed. The committee then heard House Bill 2219, which would allow child care centers more flexibility in mixed-age grouping during parts of the day and waive repeated DCYF pre-service orientation for people who have already completed it. The prime sponsor, Representative Ortiz-Self, said the bill is meant to ease burdens on small providers. Testifiers from SEIU 925, a family child care provider, the Washington Child Care Centers Association, a child care center director, and the Children’s Campaign Fund supported the bill as a practical way to improve staffing flexibility and reduce duplicative licensing requirements, though one association asked that the bill’s daily time caps on mixed-age grouping be revised or removed. The committee then heard House Bill 2253, an agency-request technical corrections bill for DCYF licensing. Staff said it would allow child-specific licenses for certain relatives under interstate placements, exempt kinship caregivers from blood-borne pathogen training, remove licensing exemptions for physicians and lawyers, allow termination of inactive licenses, revise crisis residential center staffing ratios, and eliminate state monitoring requirements for the Washington School for the Deaf residential program. Members asked about how inactivity would be defined and whether the School for the Deaf inspections had historically produced savings. DCYF said the bill would help right-size licensing workloads after budget cuts and would let the agency work with stakeholders to define inactivity in rule. Testimony from DCYF, Community Youth Services, and Partners for Our Children supported the bill, especially the staffing ratio fix for crisis residential centers and the child-specific licensing changes for relatives.

Transcript Highlights:

• But municipalities are cut out of that section of statute.
• specific section of the bill?
• specific section of the bill?
• I'd like to work with you on this specific section of section two, subsection A, lines 114 to 118 to
• I'd like to work with you on this specific section of section two, subsection A, lines 114 to 118 to

Summary: The committee first took up PCS for HB 123, which would change the process for converting a public school to a charter school by requiring approval from a majority of parents at the school, allow municipalities to apply to convert certain schools under limited circumstances, and address surplus school property in districts with declining enrollment. The sponsor said the bill is meant to give parents the primary say and to prevent districts from holding unused property. Opponents, including the Florida PTA, several members, and public speakers, argued the bill excludes teachers, school boards, and other stakeholders, could disenfranchise parents who do not live in the municipality, and could create enrollment, transportation, and equity problems. After debate, the bill passed 13-5 and was reported favorably. The committee then heard HB 597 on diabetes management in schools. The bill would allow school districts and charter schools to procure and store glucagon pens for emergency treatment of severe hypoglycemia, permit trained personnel to administer them, require 911 to be called after use, and add limited liability protections. The sponsor said the medication is inexpensive and could save lives for the roughly 7,000 diabetic K-12 students in Florida. An amendment clarified that public and charter schools are both covered. The bill drew support from the American Diabetes Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Florida PTA, and members from both parties praised the measure. It passed unanimously and was reported favorably. Finally, the committee heard HB 85 on hazardous walking conditions, which would add walking along freeways, expressways, and their ramps as a hazardous condition requiring bus service for elementary students within two miles of school. The sponsor described personal examples of children walking near dangerous roads and said the bill is intended to prevent injuries and deaths. An amendment narrowed the language by deleting “state highway.” Public testimony included a parent who described her child being hit by a car and urged broader coverage, while members raised concerns about bus shortages and fiscal impact. Most members spoke in support, emphasizing student safety, and the bill was reported favorably after debate.

Transcript Highlights:

• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms

Bills: HF3771, HF3658, HF3453, HF3358, HF1775

Keywords: disaster assistance, contingency account, Minnesota emergency management, public safety, state disaster aid, FEMA, federal cost-share, emergency relief, natural disaster, budget report, appropriations report, management and budget, local governments, utility cooperatives, public works, infrastructure repair, chapter 12B, chapter 12A, emergency management, disaster recovery

Transcript Highlights:

• Section three is another section that is related to banks, and we’re taking that section out in the next
• </c><00:07:45.280><c> Section</c> what's required to be there. Section what's required to be there.
• Section three<00:07:45.919><c> is</c><00:07:46.160><c> another</c><00:07:46.479><c> section</c><00:07
• </c><00:09:39.680><c> Um</c><00:09:40.160><c> section</c> Yes. So that is section four.
• Um section Yes. So that is section four.

Bills: HF3676, HF3683, HF3395

Keywords: Safe at Home, address confidentiality, domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, harassment, victim privacy, survivor protection, confidential address, protected address, secret address, identity protection, residential confidentiality, program participant, nondiscrimination, court disclosure, protective order, service of process, driver's license, state ID

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, I should say sections 9 and 10 and then House sections 12 and 13.
• So Senate sections 9 and 10, House sections 12 and 13.
• So, reversing those changes from this section.
• Uh so, all the section would be section.
• </c><01:30:56.800><c> 14</c> explain about what Senate section 14 explain about what Senate section 14

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then it Section two of that.
• That section of it? >> Yes. >> Okay.
• </c> &gt;&gt; we're just striking that section &gt;&gt; we're just striking that section &gt;&gt; and
• </c><02:09:19.360><c> Um</c> section at the end on page three. Um section at the end on page three.
• &gt;&gt; Um the finding section is always an easy &gt;&gt; Um the finding section is always an easy one

Keywords: 9:00am HB 155 9:30am HB 1102 10:30am HB 1109 11:00am HB 1356 11:30am HB 1469 1:00pm HB 1323 2:00pm HB 1376, 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting began with unanimous committee approval of amendment 2026-2021S to HB 2. Senator Lang explained the amendment corrected a drafting error so that $2.5 million in state funds, matched with federal money for a total of $5 million, could be spent during the biennium rather than lapse at the end of the fiscal year. The money is intended to stabilize Medicaid per diem rates for county nursing homes, and members agreed without objection to adopt the amendment and continue working from the bill as amended by the Senate. The committee then discussed HB 155 and a proposed amendment, 2026-201H, dealing with the business enterprise tax. The House side described the proposal as a compromise that would raise the filing threshold from $250,000 to $375,000 and create a trigger that would reduce the BET rate by 0.05% for each $100 million in combined business tax surplus, down to a floor of 0.25%. Senate members opposed lowering the rate at this time, arguing that tax relief should focus on the filing threshold, which they said would remove filing burdens for about 3,500 small businesses, and that rate cuts should be considered in a budget cycle rather than an off-year. Concerns were raised that one-time revenues, such as tax amnesty receipts or federal repatriation-related surpluses, could unintentionally trigger reductions. Representative Sweeney later offered a revised approach by moving the effective date of the trigger mechanism to January 1, 2028, and said he was also willing to carve out tax amnesty revenues or adjust the effective date to avoid using one-time funds. The Senate remained unwilling to agree to a rate reduction, though it expressed openness to raising the filing threshold further. The committee ultimately did not resolve the business tax issue and recessed to continue discussions at a later time. The final item discussed was HB 1102, concerning an increase in the research and development tax credit paired with changes to state park fees. House members supported the R&D credit increase but opposed tying it to higher park fees, citing concerns about tourism, especially at border parks, and noting that the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources had said it did not need the increase. Senate members defended the park fee changes as a fairness issue, arguing that New Hampshire residents should pay less than out-of-state visitors and that the department had not raised rates in many years. No vote was taken on this item during the discussion captured here.

Transcript Highlights:

• Walsh of Peabody moves to amend the bill by striking out Section 1.
• following section: Section 1, paragraph A, notwithstanding Section 1 of Chapter 30 of the General Laws
• The bill in Section 2F by inserting after item 1596-2703 the following item.
• Section 40, Section 2, DDD, DDD of Chapter 29 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2024 official
• Michaelowitz of Boston and others move to amend the bill in Section 2A.

Summary: The House convened with the Pledge of Allegiance, received and placed on file the resignation letter of Rep. Vanna Howard of Lowell, and adopted several routine committee reports. These included extensions of reporting deadlines for the Healthcare Financing and Public Health committees, concurrence with Senate petitions sent to Housing and Public Safety and Homeland Security, and suspension of Joint Rule 12 for a petition concerning children involved with DCF. The chamber also adopted a resolution commending the Admetek Foundation on Prostate Cancer Awareness Day. The main business was House No. 5264, a fiscal year 2026 supplemental appropriations bill totaling about $1.8 billion. House leaders described the bill as using Fair Share surtax surplus funds for transportation and education, addressing MBTA reserves, safety and infrastructure, special education circuit breaker costs, early education and childcare, and other deficiencies such as GIC costs, sheriff deficiencies, heating assistance, and World Cup-related expenses. Members also discussed the bill’s tax conformity provisions responding to federal tax changes, with supporters arguing the bill would reduce a projected revenue shortfall and preserve competitiveness while delaying some conformity changes. The House considered several amendments to the supplemental bill. Amendment 43, which would have redirected $100 million of Fair Share funds to a per-capita municipal distribution for roads and schools, drew debate over equity and rural road needs but was rejected on a roll call, 25-128. A consolidated amendment was then adopted on a roll call, 148-0, and the bill itself was passed to be engrossed on a roll call, 150-3. The House also adopted an amendment setting the next day’s meeting time and then adjourned to meet the following day at 11 a.m. in informal session.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 1011 amends Section 11-590 relating to centers situated in the county medical examiner.
• Senate Bill 1173 amends Section 36-411.02, Section 41-619.51, and Section 41-7508.07 of Arizona law relating
• Senate Bill 1234 amends Section 8-221, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to juvenile court.
• Senate Bill 1544, amending Title 13, Chapter 10, Section 13-922, relating to probation.
• Senate Bill 1274, enacting Section 28-23-51 and 28-24-70, amending Section 28-20-65, Title 28, Chapter

Summary: The Senate opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, guest introductions, and a proclamation declaring March as Sleep Apnea Awareness Month. Guests recognized included ACLU of Arizona volunteers for Lobby Day, a student intern, a doctor of the day specializing in dementia care, and members of the Arizona chapter of the American Institute of Architects for Architecture Advocacy Day. The chamber also received several appointments to committees and a series of House messages and bills for introduction and first reading. The main floor action was third reading votes on multiple measures. The Senate passed SB 1011, SB 1017, SB 1170, SB 1173, SB 1234, SB 1275, SB 1332, SB 1544, SB 1557, SB 1585 on reconsideration, SCR 1022, SB 1273, and SB 1274, with most votes falling along a 17-9 or 16-10 split. Several senators explained their no votes, raising concerns about mandatory minimum drug penalties, juvenile court changes, diversion policy, and the light rail feasibility study; supporters argued for public safety, judicial discretion, or the need for updated studies and voter review. On SCR 1022, which would refer a constitutional amendment on legislative member districts, supporters argued Arizona’s House is too small for its population and should be expanded, while opponents said the idea needed more study before going to voters. The Senate also heard committee announcements for the next day, including meetings for Health and Human Services, Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency, Education, Judiciary and Elections, and Public Safety. The body then adjourned until Wednesday, March 18, 2026, at 1:15 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• by section, and is now before the Senate for final consideration.
• We're actually repealing a whole section of code and creating this new section to make it constitutional
• by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration.
• Section by section, and placed before the Senate for final consideration. Is there an objection?

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate opened with roll call, prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and approval of the corrected journal. Committee reports were received on several measures, including referrals of newly printed Senate bills and concurrent resolutions, confirmation of David Bobbitt to the Idaho Fish and Game Commission, and committee recommendations on House Bills 494, 526, 531, 624, 518, 636, and Senate Bills 1257 and 1288. The chamber also received gubernatorial and House messages, including the governor’s appointment of Brian Marks to the Sexual Offender Management Board and House-passed bills 501, 558, 608, and 636. On third reading, the Senate passed Senate Bill 1232, which updates Idaho’s “Son of Sam” law to prevent criminals from profiting from notoriety while preserving constitutional protections; it passed 33-0 with two absent. Senate Bill 1250 also passed, 34-0 with one absent, to exempt certain photos, including photos of deceased persons, from public disclosure while allowing specified family members to request copies. Senate Bill 1236, which repeals obsolete code relating to the Idaho Women’s Commission, passed after extended debate on the commission’s history and legacy; the vote was 29-5 with one absent. The Senate then considered Senate Bill 1247, requiring E-Verify use by state and local governments and certain larger government contractors. Supporters said it would strengthen employment verification for taxpayer-funded work and create a measured first step, while opponents argued E-Verify is flawed and may encourage identity fraud or fail to address illegal employment. The bill passed 27-7 with one absent and was sent to the House. The Senate then moved to miscellaneous business, heard announcements, and adjourned until the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• So what I'd like to do is just kind of point to the various sections of this.
• You see in there there's a section that's called foreign law enforceability.
• That section talks about...
• That section talks about...
• That's under the applicability section.

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 556, which would raise the state reimbursement rate paid to counties for housing state-committed inmates and parole violators in county jails from the current $55 for the first seven days and $75 thereafter to a flat $80 per day. The sponsor and county officials argued counties are subsidizing the state because actual jail costs are higher, with testimony citing average county costs around $106 to $120 per inmate per day and about $15 million in annual county subsidy statewide. Several sheriffs and county representatives said the bill would help but would not fully cover costs, and they also noted counties lose jail space and programming capacity when state inmates remain in local facilities. Questions focused on programming, liability, and where the additional $3.1 million fiscal impact would come from. A motion to hold the bill until February 25 failed 5-8, and the committee then advanced H 556 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. The committee next considered House Bill 602, which would bar Idaho courts from applying foreign law when it conflicts with fundamental rights or public policy, while carving out exceptions for certain entities, preexisting contracts, religious exercise, and treaties. The sponsor and a supporting witness said the bill is intended to ensure American and Idaho law govern Idaho courts and to prevent foreign legal systems from overriding constitutional rights. Members raised questions about possible conflicts with U.S. treaties and prior international family-law issues, and the bill’s proponents said those concerns were addressed by the bill’s exceptions. After testimony from the Idaho Family Policy Center in support, the committee voted to send H 602 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 654, which would add electronic storage detection dogs to the statutory definition of police dogs protected under Idaho’s law against killing or mistreating police dogs. The sponsor and Idaho Attorney General’s Office testified that these dogs are trained to detect a chemical compound associated with electronic storage devices and are used in investigations, especially child exploitation cases, to locate hidden devices such as flash drives, phones, and cameras. Supporters said the dogs have already been deployed successfully and help protect children and assist investigations. The committee then voted to send H 654 to the floor with a due pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• It removes sections requiring the removal of Senator Dhingra, Fox Trot.
• It removes sections requiring the removal of personal information from the internet and it retains sections
• This section basically is reinstating current law.
• in the judicial warrant section.
• And so this amendment removes that section from the bill for the discussion. Senator Holy?

Bills: SB5925, SB6086, SB6074, SB5962, SB6296, SGA9272, SGA9255, SGA9256, SGA9271

Keywords: Attorney General, civil investigative demand, CID, subpoena-like demand, investigative authority, consumer protection, civil enforcement, pre-suit investigation, document production, interrogatories, deposition, oral testimony, confidentiality, trade secrets, judicial review, enforcement action, Washington RCW, law enforcement powers, government transparency, due process

Transcript Highlights:

• Frost of Auburn moves to amend the bill by adding the following section: Section 2. Mr.
• Frost of Auburn moves to amend the bill by adding the following section: Section 2.
• Frost of Auburn moves to amend the bill by adding the following section. Section 2. Mr.
• Frost of Auburn moves to amend the bill by adding the following section. Section 2.
• Frost of Auburn moves to amend the bill by adding the following section: Section 2.

Summary: The House convened for a floor session that began with routine actions, including suspension of the rules and adoption of several committee-reported resolutions and orders. Members adopted a congratulatory resolution for Yolanda Kruger’s 100th birthday and approved orders extending the Public Health Committee’s reporting deadlines on House documents 4984 and 4988. The chamber also moved through a number of local bills, including measures authorizing additional alcohol licenses for Hudson and Cohasset and a charter amendment for Plymouth, all of which were passed to be engrossed. The House then took up several major bills on third reading. House 3417, designating Domestic Workers’ Rights Day, was debated at length by Representative Sousa, who described domestic workers as essential but often invisible workers and argued the designation would raise awareness of existing protections and help prevent exploitation. The bill passed to be engrossed on a roll call vote of 156-0. The House also passed House 4992, authorizing Barnstable County and the town of Bourne to convey land, and House 4994, the “Paths Act,” which would require a phased-in apprenticeship participation standard on large public construction projects and establish a commission to study apprenticeship issues. Supporters emphasized workforce development, union apprenticeship pathways, and long-term economic opportunity. Another major measure, House 4993, the Preston Settles Every Minute Counts Act, would require automated external defibrillators and trained personnel at sporting facilities and events. Representative Decker described the bill as a response to the death of a young athlete from sudden cardiac arrest and said it would close a safety gap outside schools. Representative Frost offered amendments to create a state fund to help communities pay for AEDs and to allow exemptions for remote locations without permanent power, but both amendments were rejected on roll call votes. The bill itself later passed to be engrossed by roll call, and the House also enacted a Hingham land-use bill allowing municipal property to be used for a center for active living. The session included several recesses, introductions of visitors and constituents, and ended with the House adjourning to meet the next day at 11 a.m.