Video & Transcript Research : 'spending limits'

Page 11 of 500
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I insisted that we limit our Spending, and we built up our savings account.
  • I slammed the brakes on spending every dime we were authorized.
  • And where I have the authority, I'll rein in welfare spending. Government dependency is a trap.
  • It's driving massive spending growth while enabling waste.
  • This challenge isn't new, and it isn't limited to early literacy.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There will be no limit on school suspensions, but placements will be reviewed every 15 days.
  • I believe I'm speaking from limited conversations with Leach, but that's what makes sense.
  • This student is very dangerous, and I'm limited in what options I have at my disposal.
  • It's important for senators to recognize that this provision is actually fairly limited; it is limited
  • Yes, what we might call zero tolerance, we might also refer to as limited disruption.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • While the bill codifies TCHAT, limited telemedicine visits can only go so far.
  • This led to increased frustration, continued issues with behavior, and limited academic success.
  • Uplift prioritizes its limited budget dollars on where we see our greatest return on college and career
  • These restrictions limit the potential development of the UT Austin Academic Medical Center site and
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • It would create a further strain on limited resources at governing agencies, resulting in further delays
  • It's 87.24 acres in Montgomery County, located partially within the incorporated limits and partially
  • Cities already have the authority to purchase, establish, and manage cemeteries within their limits if
  • Today, we're now bringing the cemeteries inside the city's city limits for what purpose?
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
Summary: The committee heard testimony and took action on several land use, housing, municipal utility district, and cemetery-related bills. House Bill 447, dealing with transportation impact analysis requirements tied to MUD bond issuance, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the sponsor’s closing remarks, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1202, on third-party review of home backup power installations, was substituted and reported favorably to the full House by a unanimous roll call. House Bill 2494, on disannexation for failure to provide municipal services, and House Bill 1835, removing barriers to HUD-code manufactured homes, were also substituted and reported favorably; HB 1835 passed on a 5-1 vote. Senate Bill 15, limiting lot size and density requirements in certain large municipalities, was substituted and reported favorably unanimously. The committee also heard House Bill 897, which would authorize the sale or long-term lease of two state-owned Austin properties used by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission and HHSC. The sponsor said the properties are in poor condition and that proceeds would benefit the state; after questions, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Several template MUD bills were then laid out, including HB 5652, HB 5654, HB 5661, and HB 5656, each creating or authorizing municipal utility districts in Montgomery or Fort Bend counties for water, wastewater, drainage, road, and recreational improvements. These bills drew limited testimony in support and were left pending without objection. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would repeal last session’s change allowing new cemeteries within certain distances of municipalities and restore the prior rule limiting cemetery placement near growing urban areas. The sponsor and supporters argued the 2023 change created unintended consequences, removed valuable taxable land from future use, and complicated city planning; opponents, including a funeral service industry representative, argued the current law gives communities local control and helps address cemetery land shortages. After extensive testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4753, a bill allowing a property owner to use a municipal record showing a certificate of occupancy was issued when the original document is lost; it was left pending. Finally, HB 3680, a Cameron County-specific bill modifying subdivision/model rule procedures to reduce replatting burdens while preserving colonia protections, and HB 4812, clarifying that condominiums follow Chapter 82 of the Property Code rather than full subdivision platting, both received supportive testimony and were left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Today, we're now bringing the cemeteries inside the city's city limits for what purpose?
  • The city limits, the city grew to the... Fort Sam Houston did as well at the time.
  • The city limits, the city grew to the cemetery.
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on a series of land use, housing, and local government bills. House Bill 447, relating to TIA requirements for certain MUD bond issuances, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work already done, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the author’s closing, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. The committee then voted out Senate Bill 1202 (third-party review of home backup power installations), House Bill 2494 (disannexation for failure to provide services), House Bill 1835 (removing barriers to HUD co-manufactured homes), and Senate Bill 15 (lot size and density limits in certain municipalities), with House Bill 1835 receiving one no vote and the others passing unanimously. House Bill 897, authorizing sale or lease of two state-owned Austin properties, was laid out and left pending after brief questions and no public testimony. The committee also heard and left pending several MUD creation bills for Montgomery and Fort Bend counties, including House Bills 5652, 5654, 5661, and 5656, each presented as template district bills with local support and no opposition recorded at the table. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would restore prior restrictions on new cemeteries near growing urban areas by repealing changes made last session. Representative Lujan and supporters argued the current law created unintended consequences, including loss of developable land, tax-exempt property in urban cores, and conflicts with infrastructure planning; they said cities already have authority to establish their own cemeteries if needed. Opponents, including a funeral services industry representative, argued the 2023 change was intended to let communities decide and that the bill would take local decision-making backward. After extensive testimony from both sides, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 3680, which would create a Cameron County-specific process allowing local discretion under the model subdivision rules. Supporters said the bill would preserve colonia protections while reducing costly platting and replatting burdens on families trying to sell or pass down land; county officials and realtors testified in favor. The bill was left pending after closing. House Bill 4812, a clarification to the Texas Uniform Condominium Act to prevent counties from imposing subdivision platting requirements on condominiums, received support from builders and a condominium attorney who said current county practices create duplicative hurdles and higher costs; it too was left pending. Finally, House Bill 5148, which would allow certain single-stair apartment buildings up to six stories, generated the most detailed policy debate. Supporters, including housing advocates and architects, said the bill would lower costs, improve unit design, and expand affordable, family-friendly housing while maintaining safety through sprinklers and other safeguards. Fire officials from Corpus Christi opposed the bill, warning that a single stairwell could hinder firefighting and occupant evacuation, especially if sprinklers fail or smoke spreads. The author said the bill was aimed at new construction only and was part of a broader effort to reduce outdated housing regulations; the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending at adjournment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Today, we're now bringing the cemeteries inside the city limits for what purpose?
  • Start within the city limits.
  • City limits. The city grew to the... Fort Sam Houston did as well at the time.
  • City limits, the city grew to the cemetery.
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Public testimony will be limited to two minutes. Yeah, 15, HB3897.
  • I have limited benefits compared to municipality employees who do get benefits.
  • District Utility District that is or will be within the corporate limits of both the city of Mustang
  • The district is located in Austin County and is within the corporate limits of the city of Sealy.
  • The committee substitute limits the scope to counties adjacent to high population areas and allows commissioners
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Transportation Mar 27th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • One company I know of has one employee who spends 15 days a month tracking down frack tanks at various
  • cross commercial traffic or you also regular traffic, we do cross regular traffic, but it's very limited
  • Now with all these commercial trucks and the limited number of regular vehicles that also cross from
  • private, so, the private bridges are allowed to bring a tandem, a tandem trailer over, and, and so the limit
  • This bill addresses the maximum weight limits for vehicles traveling on public highways near the Farr
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Mar 27th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • In many cases, these tanks are at a specific location. ...as one employee who spends 15 days a month
  • No, no, we do cross regular traffic, but it's very limited.
  • Now, with all these commercial trucks and the limited number of regular vehicles that also cross, as
  • This bill addresses the maximum weight limits for vehicles traveling on public highways near the Pharr
  • Enforcing weight limits is crucial for preserving the integrity of the bridge and ensuring safe travel