Video & Transcript Research : 'runoff primary'

Page 11 of 373
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 24th, 2025

Congressional Redistricting, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, primary elections are already confusing and under-publicized, especially for new voters
  • students could be shuffled into new districts with different representatives right before a competitive primary
  • What neither of those cases have... ...said, and I think this is our primary disagreement with the DOJ
  • By the time we get to a runoff—like you said, likely a runoff, right?
  • There are various people that are running, and we don't know exactly when that runoff would be, right
Keywords: 997, house, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Agriculture & Livestock Mar 11th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • number of conservation related grant programs for local soil and water districts, which are their primary
  • One of the agency's primary Responsibilities is being the state's leading agency for the voluntary abatement
  • management and prevention of non-point source pollution or runoff from agricultural sources that aren't
Bills: HB294, HB405, HB519, HB294
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Addressing the Sacramento, Feather, Yuba River area was always a primary and highlighted concern.
  • Addressing the Sacramento Feather Yuba River area was always a primary and highlighted concern.
  • Yeah, and their primary purpose is water supply. I'm sorry, say that one more time.
  • That's their primary driver.
  • We have the governor's water supply strategy that identified stormwater capture as one of the primary
Summary: The committee held an informational hearing on flood risk and flood management in California, with opening remarks emphasizing that flooding is a statewide and growing threat due to climate change, including the possibility of extreme losses in a worst-case event. Members noted recent flooding in places such as San Diego, the Tulare Basin, and Pajaro, and framed the hearing as a way to better understand prevention, response, and how to capture excess water for later use. Jeffrey Mount of PPIC gave the main overview, describing California’s high flood exposure, the different flood types the state faces, and the mix of structural and non-structural tools used to manage them. He stressed that levees, dams, bypasses, land-use planning, flood insurance, and emergency response all matter, but that risk is rising because current standards are based on past hydrology rather than future climate conditions. He also warned that flood management is underfunded, that the National Flood Insurance Program is weak, and that federal support is increasingly uncertain. Members asked about groundwater recharge, permitting, NOAA and federal cuts, and which communities are most at risk; Mount said recharge can help but does not eliminate flood risk, and that small Central Valley communities and heavily developed floodplains are especially concerning. State officials Laura Hollander of the Department of Water Resources and Jane Dolan of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board described the state’s role in forecasting, emergency response, grants, planning, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan. They highlighted aging infrastructure, the need for better coordination, and the state’s special liability in the Central Valley after the Paterno decision. Dolan reviewed the history of major floods and said the plan calls for about $1 billion per year over 30 years to meet current needs, while Hollander said the state works with local and federal partners on preparedness, response, and subventions projects. Both emphasized that floodplain planning, regional coordination, and faster permitting are important, but that more consistent funding is needed. A later panel from local flood agencies and districts reinforced those points, arguing that the state’s annual flood funding is below identified needs and that a proposed statewide flood and dam safety bond was reduced substantially in the broader climate bond package. Witnesses urged more routine maintenance funding, support for regional flood planning, and continued federal-state-local partnerships to reduce risk and maintain eligibility for federal assistance. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the informational hearing.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • We also have storm water regulations that look at pre- and post-development to see what kind of runoff
  • We also have storm water regulations that look at pre- and post-development to see what kind of runoff
  • 00:17:12.079> of post development to see what kind of post development to see what kind of runoff
  • <00:17:13.600> We<00:17:13.919> also runoff you're going to have.
  • We also runoff you're going to have.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The subcommittee opened discussion on SP 170 and worked through the bill section by section, focusing first on housing discrimination language and then on land-use and development provisions. On the housing section, members discussed adding “school enrollment status” or a similar term as a protected class to prevent municipalities from steering students into specific zones, especially in Durham. Some members questioned whether “status” was too vague and suggested “enrollment status” or “school enrollment status” for clarity. Public testimony raised concerns that adding a new protected class could have broader implications beyond this bill and could affect municipal zoning authority, while supporters argued the language was needed to prevent discrimination against students in housing access. The committee then heard testimony on provisions limiting municipal authority over septic test pits and well-siting requirements. DEES officials and a builder testified that state standards are already protective of groundwater and surface water and that some local requirements are more stringent than the state’s, adding cost and delay to housing projects. Supporters said uniform state standards would make housing development faster and more predictable. Opponents warned that local rules can protect aquifers, wellhead areas, and drinking water in specific communities, and that removing municipal flexibility could weaken those protections. The subcommittee appeared comfortable keeping these sections, though members discussed whether to clarify the language and whether some local review authority should remain. The meeting also covered road-length limits, caps on the number of lots on dead-end roads, and subdivision design rules. Members generally supported prohibiting municipalities from using maximum road length or lot caps to block development, with one amendment suggested to allow such limits where adequate water and sewer capacity is lacking. The committee also discussed allowing utilities and infrastructure such as septic systems, wells, electric systems, drainage structures, and shared leach fields to be placed in subdivision open space or perimeter buffers when those areas are not protected wetlands or shoreland. Finally, the committee reviewed a provision requiring municipalities to stamp and accept plan changes within three days after initial review, with members explaining that the goal is to prevent repeated, incremental changes from dragging out the approval process. No final votes were taken in the portion of the meeting provided, but members indicated general comfort with several sections as amended or clarified.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Health Committee Meeting - 2026-03-25

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • direct primary care is not insurance. direct primary care is not insurance.
  • primary care. primary care.
  • c> direct<01:23:13.640> primary Direct primary care and direct primary Direct primary care
  • primary care. primary care.
  • <01:29:51.880> care<01:29:52.680> can primary care and good primary care can primary
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Mar 26th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We provide the only access to primary care and mental health care in those counties.
  • This bill allows for these contracts only for primary care physicians or primary care physician groups
  • So this is, one of the easy ways to think about this in primary care; it's kind of like direct primary
  • Texas Primary Care Consortium.
  • I'm a local practicing physician with a Direct Primary Care Clinic.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee Feb 9th, 2026 at 10:30 am

A&B Natural Resources Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there any study that looks at the impact of biosolid use on nearby water streams or runoff?
  • Then K through 12's primary goal is that we're funding concurrent enrollment.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Science, Technology and Energy (04/07/2025)

Science, Technology and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • plans using standard rainfall runoff plans using standard rainfall runoff models<00:11:19.200>
  • <00:12:04.000> is science regarding how much runoff is science regarding how much runoff is
  • Uh you know, rainfall runoff models.
  • Is that runoff that might not occur. Is that correct?
  • It was brought to my and runoffs.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • application is not managed well, farmers’ profit can be diminished, and there is potential nutrient runoff
  • diminished and there is potential be diminished and there is potential nutrient nutrient nutrient runoff
  • <00:05:13.360> farmers<00:05:13.720> are<00:05:13.919> increasingly runoff farmers
  • are increasingly runoff farmers are increasingly challenged<00:05:15.120> to<00:05:15.280>
  • Field conservation practices to minimize runoff, and of course Minnesota CCA plays an important role
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Select Water Committee, May 7, 2026

Select Water Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • in Wyoming, regardless of size, is responsible for managing runoff, drainage, flooding concerns, and
  • The rest of it is what we consider runoff.
  • consider runoff. consider runoff.
  • Um, so what are our primary concerns with produced water?
  • Um, so what are our primary concerns with produced water?
Keywords: 916, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Aug 11th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • It will capture stormwater and agricultural runoff, treating it with a major drainage outfall.
  • If they were to look at the entire watershed and the surface runoff that's going to be coming to these
  • inherent challenge that we have is that we inherited a system that was really designed for agricultural runoff
  • , so it's really not sufficient to carry all the surface runoff that the expanding population has created
  • asking Hidalgo County about with regards to retention and detention, because as you mentioned, the runoff
Keywords: 997, house, all
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy REVISED Apr 23rd, 2026

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • about the profits that they can get off of these solar arrays, but also not talk about soil quality, runoff
  • , rain runoff, how... ...runoff, rain runoff, how to have access to the data to know if the production
Summary: The committee first considered the nomination of Russell Isaacs to the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Isaacs described his farming background and experience with cotton, corn, sorghum, and wheat, and said he regularly tests conservation technologies on his farm. Senators discussed his water-conservation experience and the value he could bring to the board. The nomination received 10 ayes and 0 nays and was advanced to the full Senate floor. Members then took up House Bill 3183, dealing with smart transmission technology and electric grid efficiency. Senator Murdoch explained that the bill had been difficult to negotiate and that the enacting clause was stricken so work could continue on a committee substitute. He said the technology would allow existing transmission towers to carry lighter, more efficient lines, reduce wildfire risk, and potentially lower long-term rates by easing congestion. Senators asked about costs, who pays, and whether ratepayers or large load users would bear the burden; an amendment changed language from “customer funded” to “large load user funded.” The committee adopted the amendment and then passed the bill 7 ayes to 3 nays. The committee also advanced several nominations and bills related to environmental and energy policy. Steve Mason was confirmed to the Environmental Quality Board by an 8-0 vote. House Bill 4316, which removes an old deadline that prevented nonprofit corporations from converting into water districts and accessing grant funding, passed 8-0. House Bill 4484, allowing discretionary use of state-owned or state-leased vehicles between employees’ homes and workplaces to save mileage costs, passed 9-0. House Bill 3464 created a statewide framework for energy storage and solar facilities; a motion to table an amendment failed, and the bill passed 10-0 after debate over landowner protections, decommissioning, fire safety, and dual-use agricultural concerns. The committee then passed House Bill 3173, the Well-Repurposing Act, 10-0, to allow orphaned and abandoned wells to be repurposed for geothermal and energy storage uses, with discussion about surface-owner rights and possible tweaks to the geothermal temperature definition. House Bill 3469, a measure easing surety requirements for smaller producers by allowing a stair-stepped compliance schedule, passed 9-0. Finally, House Bill 3989 was amended for drafting corrections and then passed 9-0; it relates to the one-megawatt load standard and uses actual load over a two-year period rather than plate load. The chair ended the meeting by thanking members and staff and adjourning the committee.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Government Oversight Mar 3rd, 2026 at 10:30 am

Government Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • streamlines the mortgage refinance Act and then it allows the lenders to maintain their status as a primary
  • This goes into effect November of twenty-six, so it wouldn't impact primary or runoff.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Legacy Finance Committee 4/15/26

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • It is important to note that there has not been a significant runoff event since the weir's installation
  • 00:20:54.960> been<00:20:55.160> a<00:20:55.200> significant<00:20:55.880> runoff
  • <00:20:56.240> event not been a significant runoff event not been a significant runoff event
  • This is not just an inconvenience; it is a loss of my family's primary source of income. operation.
  • family's primary source of income. family's primary source of income.
Bills: HF3879
Summary: The committee approved the April 8, 2026 minutes and then took up House File 3879, the Legacy Finance Outdoor Heritage bill. The committee adopted the DE1 author’s amendment, which incorporated the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council’s revised recommendations and made technical corrections, and staff explained that the bill appropriates about $191.081 million in Outdoor Heritage funding, plus carryforwards and an extension for a carp deterrent project at Lock and Dam. Staff also noted the bill makes no changes to the Clean Water Fund or Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund, and the bill was moved to the Committee on Ways and Means. A large portion of the meeting focused on the Roseau Lake rehabilitation/Roseau River restoration project and related concerns about landowner impacts, eminent domain, drainage, and whether Outdoor Heritage dollars are being used on private property. Landowners and their attorney testified that the project threatens private farmland, that they do not consent to easements or takings, and that funding should be paused until litigation and legal questions are resolved. They described flooding, drainage problems, financial burdens, and long-term harm to family farms, and asked the committee to suspend funding for the project. Supporters of the project, including Roseau Mayor Dan Fabian and farmer/watershed district manager Jason Bratton, said the project is part of a broader flood-mitigation effort following the 2002 Roseau flood and would help control water, reduce flood damage, and improve conditions for downstream farmers. After testimony, the committee considered the A5 amendment, offered by Representative Heintzeman, which would delete the Roseau Lake Rehabilitation Project Phase 3 from the bill. Members debated the amendment, with some emphasizing landowner concerns and pending litigation and others defending the project and the council’s vetting process. The transcript cuts off during continued discussion, and no final vote on the A5 is shown in the provided text.
FL

Florida 2026 4th Special Session

January 13, 2026 - 01:00 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • The primary role is not for water quality, it's for upland area adjacent to wetlands to protect them
  • Secondary, would that include pollution or runoff? Chair: You are recognized. Rep.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Local Government Committee Apr 22nd, 2026

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • We will take up to two primary witnesses in support and up to two primary witnesses in opposition for
  • How about any primary witnesses in opposition? Any opposition at all?
  • Any primary witnesses in opposition to this measure? Seeing no one.
  • Any primary witnesses in opposition? Please come to the desk. Seeing no one.
  • Any primary witnesses in opposition? I don't know if we need them, but...
Keywords: 988, house, all
Summary: The committee hearing covered a large slate of local government and housing-related bills, with several authors presenting measures aimed at streamlining development, updating local government procedures, and addressing infrastructure and resource issues. Early bills included AB 2639 on Merced County flood control coordination, AB 1786 allowing certain local agencies to use best-value contracting, AB 2058 reducing duplicative permitting and inspection costs for factory-built housing, AB 2576 clarifying historic resource protections in housing law, AB 2568 increasing the number of compensated days for water district board members, AB 2224 updating county recorder fees and electronic recording requirements, AB 2469 requiring data-center water supply assessments and cost responsibility, and AB 2397 limiting local vetoes over housing infrastructure financing districts. Most of these measures drew support from local governments, housing advocates, or special districts, while some also drew opposition from business, county, or labor groups depending on the bill. The most extensive debate centered on AB 1751, which would create ministerial approval for qualifying townhome projects and establish a $28 hourly minimum wage floor for construction workers on covered projects, while expressly preserving prevailing wage law. Supporters, including the author, the California Conference of Carpenters, and housing advocates, argued the bill would expand homeownership opportunities, raise wages for largely non-union workers, and improve accountability through direct developer liability and enforcement provisions. Opponents, including several building trades organizations and some local government groups, argued the bill would undercut prevailing wage standards, reduce benefits, and could create broader wage pressure in the construction market. Committee members raised questions about land-use barriers, the wage floor, and the bill’s interaction with prevailing wage and federal law, and the author emphasized that the measure was intended as a wage floor rather than a replacement for prevailing wage. AB 2469 on data centers also drew a sharp split. Supporters said the bill would give local governments better information before approving water-intensive projects, protect overdrafted groundwater basins, and ensure data centers pay for needed infrastructure rather than shifting costs to ratepayers. Opponents from the Chamber of Commerce, the Data Center Coalition, and others argued the bill imposed unnecessary and potentially unconstitutional burdens, singled out one industry, and could create security and competitiveness concerns. Across the hearing, several authors asked for aye votes, and committee members repeatedly noted that the committee was still operating without a quorum, so no final votes were taken during the discussion.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
  • So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
  • So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
  • So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
  • So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 387, which would amend MSD governance and spending rules in Louisville. The sponsor said the bill was intended to add oversight and accountability in response to large MSD rate increases, though the original rate-approval provision had been removed because of concerns about contracts and bond ratings in Oldham and Bullitt counties. MSD Executive Director Tony Parrott testified that MSD is a public utility serving more than 800,000 people through wastewater, stormwater, and flood protection services, and argued that most rate pressure comes from federal and state mandates tied to a consent decree and other orders. He said MSD already provides annual notice and bond approvals through Metro Council, offers customer assistance programs, and needs flexibility for advertising, public notices, recruitment, and compliance. Members discussed stormwater funding, aging infrastructure, flood control, and the bill’s limits on advertising and other expenditures. The committee substitute was adopted and the bill passed on a roll call vote. The committee then considered House Concurrent Resolution 22, as substituted, which expressed support for exploring nuclear energy and included language noting Kentucky’s ability to use nuclear waste, uranium tailings, and spent fuel in ways described by the sponsor as cleaner. Supporters said Kentucky faces an energy shortage and that nuclear, including small modular reactors, should be part of the state’s future energy mix. Some members said they would support the resolution but wanted a feasibility study or noted that it does not carry the force of law. The resolution passed. Finally, the committee began House Bill 519, sponsored by Representative Fugate, which would prevent utility companies from passing demolition costs for retired coal-fired or fossil-fuel plants on to ratepayers. The sponsor cited sharply rising electricity bills in eastern Kentucky, the decline in coal employment, and the burden of demolition costs from the Big Sandy plant being placed on customers. He argued that utilities should absorb those costs rather than shifting them to ratepayers. The bill was introduced with a motion and second, and the committee was preparing to hear further questions and testimony when the transcript ended.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • It's not the primary intent of that program, but it's important.
  • And we rolled it out at the presidential primary. And it didn't work right.
  • And before the June primary happened, Maxim Consulting had built from scratch.
  • We just had the runoff primary for that.
  • So we're requesting funding to ensure that we have enough on hand for the runoff. Primary.
Keywords: 914, all