Video & Transcript Research : 'primary runoff'
Page 11 of 368
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- No, I'm not going to say it, but anyway—but they’ll still have their... primary care doc.
Keywords:
HB 1818, Texas Insurance Code, Texas Department of Insurance, commissioner of insurance, health maintenance organization, HMO, insurer, utilization review, preauthorization, prior authorization, medical necessity review, health care services, medical care, insurance regulation, insurance examination, regulatory oversight, confidential records, public information exception, Chapter 843, Chapter 1301
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- It says noted on primary function number five.
- All right, sorry. on your noted on your primary function on your noted on your primary function number
- Hopefully, we can get it rebuilt quick enough so the spring runoff doesn't become an issue.
- We're hopeful that we'll see the same runoff this year and we won't have that issue.
- We can divert significant spring runoff.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Banking, Financial Services and Pensions Feb 10th, 2026 at 03:00 pm
Banking, Financial Services and Pensions
Transcript Highlights:
- land To data centers, but my question is, what evidence do you have that shows that actually the primary
- different versions of this ABC law, but I think some states may require that a company has what we call runoff
Keywords:
credit card transactions, payment methods, service charge, consumer rights, financial regulation, public finance, pension, pension fund, retirement system, board of trustees, proxy voting, proxy proposal, shareholder vote, shareholder activism, fiduciary duty, pecuniary factors, nonpecuniary factors, ESG, environmental social governance, social goals
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- As a reminder, primary witnesses in support are those designated by the author.
- A valid argument exists for both the general election or the primary election.
- Seeing none, we'll move on to the primary witnesses in opposition.
- Are there any primary witnesses in opposition to the bill?
- Are there any primary witnesses in opposition to the bill?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- number of conservation related grant programs for local soil and water districts, which are their primary
- One of the agency's primary Responsibilities is being the state's leading agency for the voluntary abatement
- management and prevention of non-point source pollution or runoff from agricultural sources that aren't
Keywords:
food production, property owners' association, home gardening, cottage food, urban agriculture, livestock, community standards, renewable energy, ethanol, biodiesel, incentives, agriculture, grants, honey production, beekeeping, food safety, local regulation, energy efficiency, tax exemption, residential properties
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 24th, 2025
Congressional Redistricting, Select
Transcript Highlights:
- Additionally, primary elections are already confusing and under-publicized, especially for new voters
- students could be shuffled into new districts with different representatives right before a competitive primary
- What neither of those cases have... ...said, and I think this is our primary disagreement with the DOJ
- By the time we get to a runoff—like you said, likely a runoff, right?
- There are various people that are running, and we don't know exactly when that runoff would be, right
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee Mar 11th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Addressing the Sacramento, Feather, Yuba River area was always a primary and highlighted concern.
- Addressing the Sacramento Feather Yuba River area was always a primary and highlighted concern.
- Yeah, and their primary purpose is water supply. I'm sorry, say that one more time.
- That's their primary driver.
- We have the governor's water supply strategy that identified stormwater capture as one of the primary
Summary:
The committee held an informational hearing on flood risk and flood management in California, with opening remarks emphasizing that flooding is a statewide and growing threat due to climate change, including the possibility of extreme losses in a worst-case event. Members noted recent flooding in places such as San Diego, the Tulare Basin, and Pajaro, and framed the hearing as a way to better understand prevention, response, and how to capture excess water for later use.
Jeffrey Mount of PPIC gave the main overview, describing California’s high flood exposure, the different flood types the state faces, and the mix of structural and non-structural tools used to manage them. He stressed that levees, dams, bypasses, land-use planning, flood insurance, and emergency response all matter, but that risk is rising because current standards are based on past hydrology rather than future climate conditions. He also warned that flood management is underfunded, that the National Flood Insurance Program is weak, and that federal support is increasingly uncertain. Members asked about groundwater recharge, permitting, NOAA and federal cuts, and which communities are most at risk; Mount said recharge can help but does not eliminate flood risk, and that small Central Valley communities and heavily developed floodplains are especially concerning.
State officials Laura Hollander of the Department of Water Resources and Jane Dolan of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board described the state’s role in forecasting, emergency response, grants, planning, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan. They highlighted aging infrastructure, the need for better coordination, and the state’s special liability in the Central Valley after the Paterno decision. Dolan reviewed the history of major floods and said the plan calls for about $1 billion per year over 30 years to meet current needs, while Hollander said the state works with local and federal partners on preparedness, response, and subventions projects. Both emphasized that floodplain planning, regional coordination, and faster permitting are important, but that more consistent funding is needed.
A later panel from local flood agencies and districts reinforced those points, arguing that the state’s annual flood funding is below identified needs and that a proposed statewide flood and dam safety bond was reduced substantially in the broader climate bond package. Witnesses urged more routine maintenance funding, support for regional flood planning, and continued federal-state-local partnerships to reduce risk and maintain eligibility for federal assistance. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the informational hearing.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Committee on Housing Afternoon Subcommittee (04/22/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- We also have storm water regulations that look at pre- and post-development to see what kind of runoff
- We also have storm water regulations that look at pre- and post-development to see what kind of runoff
- 00:17:12.079>
of post development to see what kind of post development to see what kind of runoff - <00:17:13.600>
We <00:17:13.919>also runoff you're going to have. - We also runoff you're going to have.
Summary:
The subcommittee opened discussion on SP 170 and worked through the bill section by section, focusing first on housing discrimination language and then on land-use and development provisions. On the housing section, members discussed adding “school enrollment status” or a similar term as a protected class to prevent municipalities from steering students into specific zones, especially in Durham. Some members questioned whether “status” was too vague and suggested “enrollment status” or “school enrollment status” for clarity. Public testimony raised concerns that adding a new protected class could have broader implications beyond this bill and could affect municipal zoning authority, while supporters argued the language was needed to prevent discrimination against students in housing access.
The committee then heard testimony on provisions limiting municipal authority over septic test pits and well-siting requirements. DEES officials and a builder testified that state standards are already protective of groundwater and surface water and that some local requirements are more stringent than the state’s, adding cost and delay to housing projects. Supporters said uniform state standards would make housing development faster and more predictable. Opponents warned that local rules can protect aquifers, wellhead areas, and drinking water in specific communities, and that removing municipal flexibility could weaken those protections. The subcommittee appeared comfortable keeping these sections, though members discussed whether to clarify the language and whether some local review authority should remain.
The meeting also covered road-length limits, caps on the number of lots on dead-end roads, and subdivision design rules. Members generally supported prohibiting municipalities from using maximum road length or lot caps to block development, with one amendment suggested to allow such limits where adequate water and sewer capacity is lacking. The committee also discussed allowing utilities and infrastructure such as septic systems, wells, electric systems, drainage structures, and shared leach fields to be placed in subdivision open space or perimeter buffers when those areas are not protected wetlands or shoreland. Finally, the committee reviewed a provision requiring municipalities to stamp and accept plan changes within three days after initial review, with members explaining that the goal is to prevent repeated, incremental changes from dragging out the approval process. No final votes were taken in the portion of the meeting provided, but members indicated general comfort with several sections as amended or clarified.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee Feb 9th, 2026 at 10:30 am
A&B Natural Resources Subcommittee
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there any study that looks at the impact of biosolid use on nearby water streams or runoff?
- Then K through 12's primary goal is that we're funding concurrent enrollment.
Keywords:
education funding, concurrent enrollment, school aid, Oklahoma State Regents, permanent school funds, higher education, revolving fund, court reporters, salaries, legislation, employment compensation, state administration, Oklahoma, community development, infrastructure, economic development, local government, financing, pooled finance, Oklahoma Emission Reduction
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Science, Technology and Energy (04/07/2025)
Science, Technology and Energy
Transcript Highlights:
- plans using standard rainfall runoff plans using standard rainfall runoff models<00:11:19.200>
- <00:12:04.000>
is science regarding how much runoff is science regarding how much runoff is- Uh you know, rainfall runoff models.
- Is that runoff that might not occur. Is that correct?
- It was brought to my and runoffs.
- <00:12:04.000>
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/25
Agriculture Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- application is not managed well, farmers’ profit can be diminished, and there is potential nutrient runoff
- diminished and there is potential be diminished and there is potential nutrient nutrient nutrient runoff
- <00:05:13.360>
farmers <00:05:13.720>are <00:05:13.919>increasingly runoff farmers - are increasingly runoff farmers are increasingly challenged<00:05:15.120>
to <00:05:15.280> - Field conservation practices to minimize runoff, and of course Minnesota CCA plays an important role
Keywords:
HF363, property tax credit, agricultural water quality credit, Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program, clean water fund, class 2a, class 2b, certified acres, conservation incentive, water quality, agricultural property, county assessor, county auditor, Department of Revenue, Department of Agriculture, property tax reimbursement, school district reimbursement, legacy finance, taxes committee, southeastern Minnesota
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- in Wyoming, regardless of size, is responsible for managing runoff, drainage, flooding concerns, and
- The rest of it is what we consider runoff.
- consider runoff. consider runoff.
- Um, so what are our primary concerns with produced water?
- Um, so what are our primary concerns with produced water?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- It will capture stormwater and agricultural runoff, treating it with a major drainage outfall.
- If they were to look at the entire watershed and the surface runoff that's going to be coming to these
- inherent challenge that we have is that we inherited a system that was really designed for agricultural runoff
- , so it's really not sufficient to carry all the surface runoff that the expanding population has created
- asking Hidalgo County about with regards to retention and detention, because as you mentioned, the runoff
OK
Transcript Highlights:
- streamlines the mortgage refinance Act and then it allows the lenders to maintain their status as a primary
- This goes into effect November of twenty-six, so it wouldn't impact primary or runoff.
Bills:
HB1245, HB2588, HB3024, HB3172, HB3279, HB3919, HB3306, HB3383, HB3431, HB3435, HB4352, HB3883, HB3942, HB4193, HB4203, HB4303, HB4311, HB4484
Keywords:
retirement, pension, public employees, Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System, benefits, survivorship, contribution rates, disability retirement, owners associations, membership requirements, property ownership, board governance, residency requirements, salary increase, state employees, public finance, bonus limits, job performance, Fair Banking Act, financial institutions
FL
Florida 2026 4th Special Session
January 13, 2026 - 01:00 PM
Transcript Highlights:
- The primary role is not for water quality, it's for upland area adjacent to wetlands to protect them
- Secondary, would that include pollution or runoff? Chair: You are recognized. Rep.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- It is important to note that there has not been a significant runoff event since the weir's installation
- 00:20:54.960>
been <00:20:55.160>a <00:20:55.200>significant <00:20:55.880>runoff - <00:20:56.240>
event not been a significant runoff event not been a significant runoff event - This is not just an inconvenience; it is a loss of my family's primary source of income. operation.
- family's primary source of income. family's primary source of income.
Bills:
HF3879
Keywords:
outdoor heritage, conservation, habitat restoration, natural resources, wildlife management, 1183, house
Summary:
The committee approved the April 8, 2026 minutes and then took up House File 3879, the Legacy Finance Outdoor Heritage bill. The committee adopted the DE1 author’s amendment, which incorporated the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council’s revised recommendations and made technical corrections, and staff explained that the bill appropriates about $191.081 million in Outdoor Heritage funding, plus carryforwards and an extension for a carp deterrent project at Lock and Dam. Staff also noted the bill makes no changes to the Clean Water Fund or Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund, and the bill was moved to the Committee on Ways and Means.
A large portion of the meeting focused on the Roseau Lake rehabilitation/Roseau River restoration project and related concerns about landowner impacts, eminent domain, drainage, and whether Outdoor Heritage dollars are being used on private property. Landowners and their attorney testified that the project threatens private farmland, that they do not consent to easements or takings, and that funding should be paused until litigation and legal questions are resolved. They described flooding, drainage problems, financial burdens, and long-term harm to family farms, and asked the committee to suspend funding for the project.
Supporters of the project, including Roseau Mayor Dan Fabian and farmer/watershed district manager Jason Bratton, said the project is part of a broader flood-mitigation effort following the 2002 Roseau flood and would help control water, reduce flood damage, and improve conditions for downstream farmers. After testimony, the committee considered the A5 amendment, offered by Representative Heintzeman, which would delete the Roseau Lake Rehabilitation Project Phase 3 from the bill. Members debated the amendment, with some emphasizing landowner concerns and pending litigation and others defending the project and the council’s vetting process. The transcript cuts off during continued discussion, and no final vote on the A5 is shown in the provided text.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Natural Resources & Energy (2-27-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
- So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
- So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
- So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
- So, in essence, you're operating a sanitary sewer system and, I guess, a stormwater runoff system.
Keywords:
Meeting Start 00:00
Attendance Roll Call 00:04
HB 387 Discussion 01:06
HB 387 Roll Call Vote 28:30
HCR 22 Discussion 29:26
HCR 22 Roll Call Vote 31:09
HB 519 Discussion 35:36
HB 519 Roll Call Vote 38:37, 958, all
Summary:
The committee first took up House Bill 387, which would amend MSD governance and spending rules in Louisville. The sponsor said the bill was intended to add oversight and accountability in response to large MSD rate increases, though the original rate-approval provision had been removed because of concerns about contracts and bond ratings in Oldham and Bullitt counties. MSD Executive Director Tony Parrott testified that MSD is a public utility serving more than 800,000 people through wastewater, stormwater, and flood protection services, and argued that most rate pressure comes from federal and state mandates tied to a consent decree and other orders. He said MSD already provides annual notice and bond approvals through Metro Council, offers customer assistance programs, and needs flexibility for advertising, public notices, recruitment, and compliance. Members discussed stormwater funding, aging infrastructure, flood control, and the bill’s limits on advertising and other expenditures. The committee substitute was adopted and the bill passed on a roll call vote.
The committee then considered House Concurrent Resolution 22, as substituted, which expressed support for exploring nuclear energy and included language noting Kentucky’s ability to use nuclear waste, uranium tailings, and spent fuel in ways described by the sponsor as cleaner. Supporters said Kentucky faces an energy shortage and that nuclear, including small modular reactors, should be part of the state’s future energy mix. Some members said they would support the resolution but wanted a feasibility study or noted that it does not carry the force of law. The resolution passed.
Finally, the committee began House Bill 519, sponsored by Representative Fugate, which would prevent utility companies from passing demolition costs for retired coal-fired or fossil-fuel plants on to ratepayers. The sponsor cited sharply rising electricity bills in eastern Kentucky, the decline in coal employment, and the burden of demolition costs from the Big Sandy plant being placed on customers. He argued that utilities should absorb those costs rather than shifting them to ratepayers. The bill was introduced with a motion and second, and the committee was preparing to hear further questions and testimony when the transcript ended.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Appropriations and Budget General Government Subcommittee 2nd Revision: Agenda Revised: 10:30 a.m. Ethics Commission
A&B General Government Subcommittee
Transcript Highlights:
- It's not the primary intent of that program, but it's important.
- And we rolled it out at the presidential primary. And it didn't work right.
- And before the June primary happened, Maxim Consulting had built from scratch.
- We just had the runoff primary for that.
- So we're requesting funding to ensure that we have enough on hand for the runoff. Primary.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select Jul 23rd, 2025
Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select
Transcript Highlights:
- Director Kidd, I wanted to focus on two of the issues that you said were primary.
- Median household income is the primary metric of that region. That area, okay.
- I say their primary role is finance and assimilation of data to build a plan from the ground up.
- Where I didn't want to go is at an agency whose primary role is data assimilation. Thank you.
- Our board sets our budget and guides our primary goals and our projects that are initiated.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- A project of its kind by a drainage district in Texas, it will capture stormwater, agricultural runoff
- So if they were to look at the entire watershed and the surface runoff that's going to be coming to these
- inherent challenge that we have is that we inherited a system that was really designed for agricultural runoff
- , so it's really not sufficient to carry all the surface runoff that the expanding population has created
- Because, as you mentioned, the runoff water doesn't care whether the surface of the water, the facility
Summary:
The House Committee on Natural Resources met to focus on flooding issues across Texas, with particular attention to South Texas and the recent catastrophic flooding in Central Texas. Chair Harris and Vice Chair Martinez emphasized that flooding is a statewide problem requiring continued legislative attention. The committee heard invited testimony from Hidalgo County Commissioner David Fuentes and Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1 General Manager Raul Sassine, who described the March flood event in Hidalgo County, including more than 20 inches of rain, six deaths, over $100 million in local damage, widespread road flooding, and repeated shutdowns of Interstate 2 and its frontage roads. They argued that existing drainage systems are under capacity, that TxDOT projects must account for downstream drainage impacts, and that local governments have already invested heavily in mitigation through bonds and partnerships.
Fuentes and Sassine also described the county’s long-term flood mitigation and water-reuse efforts, including the Delta region water management project, which would capture stormwater, runoff, and treated effluent, reduce flooding, and create potable water supply. They said the drainage district manages about 780 miles of channels and 1,100 acres of detention facilities, has used prior Flood Infrastructure Fund and GLO grants, and has ongoing applications for additional state and federal assistance. Members discussed the need for TxDOT coordination, emergency access on frontage roads, local “skin in the game,” and the possibility of combining flood control with aquifer recharge and water supply projects.
Texas Water Development Board Executive Administrator Brian McMath then presented an overview of the state’s flood planning and funding framework, including the post-Harvey legislative changes that created the Flood Infrastructure Fund, the Texas Infrastructure Resiliency Fund, and the regional/state flood planning process. He summarized the first state flood plan adopted in 2024, noting that about one in six Texans live or work in known flood hazard areas and that regional plans identified 4,609 flood risk reduction solutions with an estimated cost of $54.5 billion. He also reviewed TWDB programs for flood grants, community assistance, flood insurance compliance, stream gauges, TexMesonet, flood mapping, and the TexasFlood.org viewer. Members asked about drainage fees, technical assistance, gauge placement, the relationship between flood maps and FEMA FIRMs, and whether flood mitigation funds could support aquifer storage and recovery or recharge projects; TWDB staff said such projects can be eligible if they include flood mitigation components, but direct technical assistance cannot be paid from Flood Infrastructure Fund dollars. The committee concluded by expressing interest in further study of combining flood mitigation with aquifer recharge, and then adjourned.