Transcript Highlights:

• that you have is a first-degree murder, then then a second-degree murder or a potential charge of manslaughter
• prosecutor charged first degree and was required to include the lesser of second-degree murder and manslaughter
• And so yesterday we voted on a bill that would actually have minimum mandatory as it relates to manslaughter
• leverage that's over in a plea offer like that is the first degree was the highest since been started manslaughter

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And that's where I took my list of entire non-intoxicating versus intoxicating, because I trust their
• They specify in statute intoxicating, non-intoxicating, and then what's synthetic.
• This rapid onset of intoxication.
• or non-intoxicating.
• What's intoxicating to me is not necessarily intoxicating to you.

Bills: HB28, SB3, SB 3

Keywords: hemp regulation, consumable products, cannabinoids, state health, youth protection, licensing fees, criminal offenses, flash flood, flood warning, outdoor warning siren, emergency alert, disaster preparedness, flood mitigation, Hill Country floods, Texas Water Development Board, municipalities, counties, local government mandate, public safety, grant program

Transcript Highlights:

• The social host knowingly provided alcohol to someone who's visibly intoxicated.
• If you look midway on that page, References visible intoxication several times.
• admissible as relevant evidence of the person's intoxication.
• Obviously, the bars, if they have someone highly intoxicated, they would call.
• Obviously, the bars, if they have someone highly intoxicated, they would call.

Summary: The committee first met in executive session and voted House Bill 2808 do pass by a roll call vote of 9 yes, 4 no, and 1 present. The hearing then moved to House Bills 1808 and 3435, companion measures dubbed Grace’s Law, which would create a narrow social host liability cause of action for knowingly providing alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person age 21 or older when that conduct leads to injury, death, or property damage. The sponsors said the bills are intended to close a gap in Missouri law and encourage safer decisions at private gatherings, while supporters, including the mother of the crash victim Grace and a MADD representative, described the fatal drunk-driving crash that prompted the legislation and argued that similar laws in other states reduce impaired driving. Committee members raised questions about scope, personal responsibility, and whether the bill could reach casual gatherings or other substances; no vote was taken on the bills in the transcript. The committee then heard House Bills 3439 and 3480, which would amend the Public Safety Recruitment and Retention Act to include volunteer firefighters in the tuition assistance program for public safety personnel and their dependents. The sponsors said volunteer firefighters in rural communities do the same dangerous work as career responders and need recruitment and retention incentives, while opponents’ concerns focused on fiscal cost, fairness, and whether volunteers should receive the same benefit as full-time employees. Supporters from the Hardin Fire Protection District, Boone County Fire Protection District, the Fire Service Alliance, and the Missouri Chamber of Commerce said volunteer departments are essential in rural Missouri, that the benefit would help recruit and retain personnel, and that the program is subject to appropriation and prioritization. Members also discussed possible alternatives such as tuition waivers at public institutions and the practical challenges of defining and tracking volunteer service. No committee action was reported on these bills.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:01:35.880><c> hemp</c><00:01:36.320><c> derived</c><00:01:36.880><c> beverage</c> intoxicating hemp
• derived beverage intoxicating hemp derived beverage products<00:01:38.920><c> so</c><00:01:39.560><c
• </c> of 26 aring the specific intoxicating of 26 aring the specific intoxicating hemp<00:01:57.680><c
• He said this was an intoxicating beverage and, as such, should be treated like other intoxicating beverages
• He said that is true: these are non-alcoholic, but they are also intoxicating.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and took up Senate Bill 202, adopting a committee substitute before hearing testimony. Senator Julie Rocky Adams explained that the substitute would require the Cabinet for Health and Family Services to promulgate regulations by January 1, 2026 for intoxicating hemp-derived beverages, direct the University of Kentucky to study manufacturing, testing, distribution, sales, and consumer effects of those beverages, and impose a moratorium on their sale until July 1, 2026. Supporters, including Rep. Matt Cook, said the measure was intended as a consumer-protection step rather than a ban, citing concerns about youth access, inconsistent labeling, and the need for a clearer regulatory framework. Members asked about the legal status of the products, whether the bill could unintentionally sweep in non-intoxicating hemp beverages, and whether there was evidence of harm. Senators were told the products are legal under the federal farm bill loophole, but that testing has shown THC levels on sampled cans did not match labels and that current regulations do not specifically address intoxicating hemp-derived beverages. Senator Higdon said CHFS had already been authorized to regulate hemp products and was moving forward with regulations and enforcement, while Senator Meredith questioned whether a moratorium would unfairly punish businesses that had already invested in the market and suggested setting a THC standard instead. Public testimony then shifted to industry opposition. Jim Higdon of Cornbread Hemp said his company had invested heavily in a beverage line and argued the moratorium would function like a ban and harm small businesses. Dee Taylor of 502 Hemp and the Kentucky Hemp Association also opposed the moratorium, saying existing rules already require age limits, behind-the-counter sales, and licensed retailers, and arguing that a cap on milligrams would be preferable to a shutdown. He said retailers were seeing approved and unapproved products in the market and urged work with the Cabinet and ABC rather than a moratorium.

Transcript Highlights:

• But crimes of violence, I mean, people who are convicted of manslaughter, house burglary, those who are
• But crimes of violence, I mean, people who are convicted of manslaughter, house burglary, those who are
• :48:59.359><c> are</c><00:48:59.599><c> convicted</c><00:49:00.000><c> of</c><00:49:00.880><c> manslaughter
• </c> people who are convicted of manslaughter people who are convicted of manslaughter house<00:49:03.119

Keywords: Judiciary, Division A - Room 216, 29 January, 2026; 3:00 PM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• THCV is non-intoxicating. It's actually used for hunger suppression.
• THCV is non-intoxicating. It's actually used for hunger suppression.
• These products are intoxicating.
• We have to have sideboards when we have intoxicating products.
• And here we go again, introducing an intoxicating beverage into the marketplace.

Summary: The Committee on Agriculture heard a presentation from Florida FFA state officers Gabby Howell and Macy Jordan, who described FFA and agricultural education as a three-part model of classroom instruction, supervised agricultural experience, and leadership development. They highlighted FFA membership growth, Florida’s more than 60,000 members, industry certifications, and state funding that allows all agriculture education students to participate at no cost. Members praised the students and the organization’s role in developing future agricultural leaders. The committee then took up SB 438, which would regulate hemp and hemp extract products, including THC-infused beverages, by adding testing, labeling, retail location, age, and event restrictions, along with penalties and $2 million for testing equipment. Senator Burton said the bill is intended to address public safety, prevent products with illegal THC levels from reaching consumers, and respond to the governor’s prior veto concerns, especially store location and regulation. An amendment clarifying final batch testing was adopted without objection. Testimony was mixed. Supporters, including beverage distributors, law enforcement, and some hemp beverage businesses, backed regulation and said the bill would improve safety and clarity, though some asked for changes to avoid treating specialty beverage retailers like liquor stores. Opponents and some hemp industry representatives argued the bill was too restrictive, would hurt small businesses, and could push products into the black market; they also objected to THC limits, event restrictions, and the proposed regulatory structure. After debate, the committee voted 6-0 to report CS for SB 438 favorably.

Transcript Highlights:

• THIS YEAR FROM LAST YEAR THC B IS NOT INTOXICATING, IT'S USED FOR HUNGER SUPPRESSION.
• FOR MOST PEOPLE THESE DIFFERENCES ARE LOST RID THESE PRODUCTS ARE INTOXICATING.
• PRODUCT, WE HAVE TO HAVE SIDEBOARDS WHEN WE HAD INTOXICATING PRODUCTS.
• THC BEVERAGES ARE INTOXICATING AND SHOULD BE RESPECTED AND REGARDED AS SUCH.
• INTRODUCING AN INTOXICATING BEVERAGE INTO THE MARKETPLACE.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If you look at the definition of intoxicating liquor found in 340A.101, the definition of intoxicating
• If you look at the definition of intoxicating liquor found in 340A.101, the definition of intoxicating
• c> beer</c> intoxicating beer non- intoxicating beer intoxicating beer non- intoxicating beer was<00:
• liquor 32 beer or non- of intoxicating liquor 32 beer or non- intoxicating<00:58:38.319><c> beer</c>
• </c> 34811 the definition of intoxicating 34811 the definition of intoxicating liquor<00:59:49.200><c

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• This measure establishes the offenses of dangerous intoxication and habitual dangerous intoxication,
• </c><00:28:10.440><c> um</c> someone might be highly intoxicated um someone might be highly intoxicated
• </c> habitual dangerous intoxication. habitual dangerous intoxication.
• Um if there's a dangerous intoxication,<00:30:31.960><c> uh</c> intoxication, uh intoxication, uh it<
• ,</c><00:45:45.200><c> consistent</c> dangerous intoxication, consistent dangerous intoxication, consistent

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 3123, which would treat free tuition or school-conditioned enrollment at private educational institutions as a conditional gift rather than a contractual obligation unless otherwise agreed in writing. The Office of the Governor supported the bill, and Kamehameha Schools and the Hawaii Association of Independent Schools strongly backed it, saying it would protect donor intent, preserve school-ohana relationships, and help maintain tuition assistance and educational access for families. A committee member commented favorably on the unity among school organizations, and there were no objections raised before the committee moved on. The committee then took up Senate Bill 2438, which creates a civil cause of action for interference with constitutional and statutory rights through threats, intimidation, or coercion, with private and government enforcement options and protections for constitutionally protected speech. Testifiers from the Community Alliance on Prisons and a know-your-rights educator supported the measure as a civil rights protection grounded in the Hawaii Constitution. No opposition testimony was presented during the hearing, and the measure appeared to receive general support from those who testified. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 3142, which establishes offenses for dangerous and habitual dangerous intoxication and allows civil protective custody and emergency examination in lieu of arrest in certain cases. The Attorney General, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Department of Health, and Department of Human Services supported the bill as a treatment-oriented diversion tool for people who are dangerously intoxicated and at risk to themselves or the public. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the measure, warning it could expand police discretion, burden emergency rooms, and function as a loss of liberty without sufficient treatment resources, while committee members questioned whether the bill would simply cycle people through emergency rooms and back onto the street. No vote or final action was taken in the portion provided; the chair said decision-making would occur at the end of the agenda.

Transcript Highlights:

• Today we talk about one of those changes: the delivery of intoxicating beverages into one's private home
• </c><00:01:12.880><c> beverages</c><00:01:13.439><c> into</c> delivery of intoxicating beverages into
• delivery of intoxicating beverages into one's<00:01:14.040><c> private</c><00:01:14.400><c> home</c>
• person and we obviously intoxicated person and we could<00:08:51.360><c> probably</c><00:08:51.839><
• Anyway, the point is that's kind of what we all think obvious intoxication is, but my point is it can

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• License to Kill reports from CalMatters last year, nearly 40% of the drivers charged with vehicular manslaughter
• This is targeted on the most serious and dangerous driving offenses, such as vehicular manslaughter,

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We just today in Judiciary had a bill that did increase penalties for vehicular manslaughter, I believe
• We just today in judiciary had a bill that did increase penalties for vehicular manslaughter, I believe

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• injury to the mother by reckless operation of a vessel is vessel homicide, and stipulates that BUI manslaughter
• injury to the mother by reckless operation of a vessel is vessel homicide and stipulates that BUI manslaughter

Summary: The Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee first considered the appointment of Joshua Kellam to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Kellam described his background with Garcia Companies, emphasized his conservation interests and land stewardship work, and addressed concerns about his development ties, the commission’s composition, the recent black bear hunt vote, and a prior Yes on 2 campaign supported by the Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Supporters said he is a conservation-minded landowner and good steward of large acreage, while opponents argued the commission is already overrepresented by developers and lacks scientific or conservation expertise. After debate, the committee voted to recommend his confirmation, with Senators Smith and Arrington voting no and the rest of the members present voting yes. The committee then received an FWC implementation update on recently enacted boating and waterways legislation. FWC staff reviewed five laws: the Boater Freedom Act (SB 1388), Vessel Accountability (SB 164), Lucy’s Law/Boating Safety (HB 289), Disposition of Migrant Vessels (SB 830), and Water Access Facilities (HB 735). The presentation covered new rules on vessel stops, safety decals, Springs Protection Zones, derelict and at-risk vessel enforcement, long-term anchoring permits, tougher boating penalties, removal of migrant vessels, and grants for boating access infrastructure. Staff said rulemaking and officer training were underway, with some provisions already effective and others scheduled to take effect later in 2025 or January 2026. Members asked follow-up questions about derelict vessel cost recovery and the new Springs Protection Zone standard. FWC explained that responsible owners must reimburse removal costs and can lose vessel registration privileges if they do not pay. On Springs Protection Zones, staff said the new law raises the threshold from any harm to significant harm and requires vessel activity to be the predominant cause, with subject matter experts and partner agencies helping make that determination. Senator Smith questioned whether the higher standard makes protections harder to establish and asked about Silver Glen Springs; FWC said that proposal was paused and would be revisited under the new criteria. The committee took no further action and adjourned after the presentation.

Transcript Highlights:

• Everybody agrees that intoxicating substances should be well regulated, and for these non-intoxicating
• Everybody agrees that intoxicating substances should be well regulated, and for these non-intoxicating
• Everybody agrees that intoxicating substances should be well regulated, and for these non-intoxicating
• Everybody agrees that intoxicating substances should be well regulated, and for these non-intoxicating
• ><c> intoxicating</c><00:47:35.119><c> substance</c> agrees that intoxicating substance agrees that intoxicating

Bills: HF1672, HF1877, HF1735, HF1734, HF1271, HF1634, HF1615

Keywords: medical cannabis, medical marijuana, cannabis, cannabinoids, hemp, marijuana registry, patient registry, visiting patient, Tribal cannabis, Tribal medical cannabis program, Tribal sovereignty, Office of Cannabis Management, designated caregiver, home cultivation, adult-use cannabis, cannabis flower, cannabis products, dispensary, cannabis retail endorsement, patient protections

Bills: SB1226, SB1456, SB1462, SB1463, SB1980, SB1479, SB1608, SB1923, HB2979, HB2980, HB3662, HB4107, HB3082, HB2997, HB3083, HB3055, HB2951

Keywords: motor vehicle, accident, notification, liability, civil action, gender neutral, SB1456, Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence, sunset extension, sunset law, breath alcohol testing, DUI, DWI, drunk driving, drug testing, chemical testing, field sobriety, roadside screening, blood test, saliva test

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> feel like this is an intoxicating feel like this is an intoxicating substance<00:33:13.120><c> just
• This bill only speaks to the intoxicating effects of the beverages.
• beverage different from another intoxicating beverage.
• beverage different from intoxicating beverage different from another<00:35:17.800><c> intoxicating</c
• ><00:35:18.760><c> beverage</c><00:35:19.680><c> and</c> another intoxicating beverage and another intoxicating

Keywords: Call to Order 00:00 SB 100 Discussion 00:05 SB 100 Vote 06:42 SB 202 Discussion 08:35 SB 202 Vote 43:17 SB 17 Discussion 47:37 SB 17 Vote 48:08 SB 22 Discussion 49:22 SB 22 Vote 52:55 SB 133 Discussion 53:55 SB 133 Vote 55:15 SB 190 Discussion 56:00 SB 190 Vote 56:38 Adjournment 57:19, 958, all

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 100, which would place cigarettes, vapes, and related nicotine products under the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) system, add enforcement tools against bad actors, and regulate nitrous oxide/laughing gas sales to those under 21. Supporters, including youth advocates Mallerie Jones and Griffin Kian Neth, argued the bill would reduce youth access to nicotine products through retail licensing, compliance checks, and escalating penalties. Higdon said the bill targets illegal sales rather than most retailers, and noted the measure also updates House Bill 11 from the prior year and raises the retail license fee from $250 to $500. The committee adopted the committee substitute and then passed the bill on a roll call vote, with members voting yes and no opposition recorded in the transcript. The committee then considered Senate Bill 202, focused on cannabis-infused beverages. Senator Julie Raque Adams said the bill was intended to create common-sense public health guardrails for a rapidly growing product category sold in gas stations, liquor stores, and vape shops, and to address enforcement gaps. She explained the committee substitute would define cannabis-infused beverages at a 5-milligram limit per 12-ounce can, place enforcement under ABC while keeping CHFS manufacturing and testing rules in place, require a University of Kentucky report back to the General Assembly, allow existing higher-dose inventory to be sold through June 1, exempt festivals and fairs until January 1, 2026, and allow stores to obtain licenses to continue selling the product. The committee adopted the substitute and then heard testimony from hemp-industry representatives and a consumer. Opponents of SB 202/SB 22, including Dee Taylor of the Kentucky Hemp Association, Cornbread Hemp co-founder Jim Higdon, Annie Rouse of Cannabuzz Barn, and consumer Nancy Roberts, argued the bill would hurt a legal Kentucky hemp industry, reduce consumer access, and force sales into liquor stores. They said the 100-milligram beverage referenced in debate is actually 10 servings with a resealable top, that hemp retailers educate customers, and that the industry already operates under 2024 regulations and needs better enforcement rather than new restrictions. Higdon and Rouse objected to the 5-milligram cap, the on-premise sales ban, the move to ABC enforcement, and the taxation approach, warning the bill could wipe out a large share of business and jobs. No final vote on SB 202 was taken in the portion of the transcript provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> they are using to now sell intoxicating they are using to now sell intoxicating products<00:56:47.040
• But the to use intoxicating products.
• </c><00:57:15.280><c> products</c> that are there for intoxicating products that are there for intoxicating
• So, it is an inhalable THC product that is very intoxicating.
• </c> do they all have the same intoxicating do they all have the same intoxicating effect?

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Basically, I think we want to start and say we don't want intoxicated persons driving on our highways
• Nobody wants the possibility of having somebody injured or killed by an intoxicated driver.
• Nobody wants the possibility of having somebody injured or killed by an intoxicated driver.
• That's why I wanted to point out, we don't want intoxicated drivers on our highways.
• And that's why I wanted to point out, we don't want intoxicated drivers on our highways.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Summary: The House Judiciary Committee met in executive session and advanced several bills. House Bill 1711, concerning the Uniform Interstate Deposition and Discovery Act, was voted do pass on a 10-0 roll call. House Bill 1713, dealing with limited liability companies and Secretary of State good-standing certificate language for domestic LLCs and series LLCs, was amended, rolled into a House Committee substitute, and then voted do pass 10-0. The committee also took up House Bill 2968 and related bills 2427 and 3086, which addressed judgeships and judicial circuits. An amendment combining language from multiple judgeship proposals was adopted, including provisions for Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin, Clay, and Miller counties, and the House Committee substitute for the combined bills was voted do pass 10-0. House Bill 3072, a workers’ compensation bill, was also amended, substituted, and advanced on a 9-0 vote. In public hearing, Representatives Smith and Dolan presented House Bills 2574 and 2163, both aimed at expanding eligibility for limited driving privileges after DWI-related license loss by allowing participation in drug or adult treatment courts and, in one bill, clarifying that offenders completing a long-term treatment program may petition the sentencing court for limited driving privileges. Support testimony came from the Judicial Conference of Missouri, which said the bills extend an existing tool now needed in adult treatment court settings. Committee discussion focused on balancing public safety with access to work and treatment, and no opposition or informational witnesses appeared before the hearing concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• It says MGL chapter 90, section 24, driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, etc.
• And I just add, I think the intent is to not, you know, not have any tolerance for driving while intoxicated
• and reckless conduct where someone dies and you're the cause of it or you contributed to it is manslaughter

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use, and Recovery held a public hearing on several harm reduction bills, including measures to decriminalize simple possession and paraphernalia, authorize overdose prevention centers, and expand access to naloxone for first responders. Chair Mindy Domb and Senator John Velis opened by describing harm reduction as an evidence-based public health strategy and noting Massachusetts’ recent decline in fatal overdoses. They emphasized that testimony would help shape whether and how the bills advance, and explained the hearing process, including time limits and written testimony. Testimony was sharply divided. Supporters, including Rep. Kate Donaghue, Sen. Cindy Friedman, Rep. Marjorie Decker, Rep. Manny Cruz, public health professionals, recovery advocates, and people with lived experience, argued that harm reduction saves lives, reduces stigma, and can connect people to treatment. They supported overdose prevention centers and decriminalization as tools to keep people alive long enough to enter recovery, and several speakers described personal losses to overdose or family experiences with addiction. Some supporters also framed the bills as racial justice measures, arguing that criminal penalties for possession have disproportionately harmed Black and brown communities. Opponents, including Sen. Nick Collins and several South End residents, argued that overdose prevention centers and decriminalization would worsen public drug use, crime, and neighborhood disorder, especially around Mass and Cass. They said current approaches such as Section 35, diversion, and police leverage into treatment are more effective, and they urged more treatment beds and recovery facilities instead of harm reduction sites. Committee members questioned witnesses about research, local siting, crime data, and the relationship between harm reduction and treatment, and several members said neighborhood impacts must be considered alongside overdose prevention. The committee did not take a vote during the hearing; it continued receiving testimony and announced a later break before resuming on H. 2196 and S. 1393.

Transcript Highlights:

• eligibility for community supervision, mandatory supervision, and parole for persons convicted of intoxication
• manslaughter.
• marathons to get attention around the issue of sexual assault and lack of consent when you have been intoxicated

Bills: HB24, HB45, HB15, HB35, HB38, HB47, HB318, HB349, HB554, HB1359, HB1373, HB1647, HB2254, HB2259, HB2853, HB3073, HB3088, HB353, HB355, HB786, HB762, HB705, HB932, HB849, HB 1160, HB 1119, HB1612, HB3041, HB713, HB3104, HB3970, HB3962, HB5061, HB4042, HB4115, HB4490, HB1731, HB1705, HB2607, HB3556, HB138, HB3689, HB1788, HB1887, HB1914, HB2402, HB2306, HB1809, HB2350, HB3000, HB3237, HB3326, HB3211, HB 1056, HB2081, HB2187, HB3092, HB3308, HB3526, HB3750, HB3527, HB4219, HB4230, HB4290, HB5238, HB4804, HB4749, HCR6, HCR12, HCR34, HCR50, HCR55, HCR58, HCR70, HCR71, HCR72, HCR74, HCR75, HCR78, HCR80, HCR93, HCR100, HCR107, HCR116, HCR117, HCR90, SB1806, SB783, SB1271, SB326, SB1637, SB769, SB897, SB1035, SB1706, SB1185, SB1194, SB384, SB1426, SB1468, SB1215, SB1066, SB599, SB1930, SB2065, SB767, SB1619, SB1738, HB1500, HB718, HB23, HB34, HB 119, HB 128, HB 130, HB132, HB2756, HB166, HB406, HB186, HB331, HB380, HB1583, HB1584, HB621, HB303, HB552, HB366, HB463, HB 1211, HB1327, HB1461, HB923, HB1760, HB2467, HB5333, HB1592, HB1576, HB1552, HB2018, HB3511, HB1781, HB2013, HB2340, HB2508, HB2970, HB865, HB2851, HB3385, HB3336, HB3309, HB 1127, HB 1232, HB1397, HB4236, HB4041, HB1965, HB2730, HB3698, HB3699, HB163, HB201, HB272, HB405, HB519, HB654, HB694, HB791, HB 1136, HB 1240, HB 1266, HB 1275, HB1437, HB1532, HB1675, HB1842, HB1868, HB1894, HB1943, HB1990, HB2029, HB2061, HB2286, HB2523, HB2622, HB2652, HB2692, HB2842, HB2885, HB3016, HB3096, HB3248, HB3255, HB3479, HB3611, HB3623, HB3803, HB3804, HB3805, HB3806, HB3810, HB3816, HB4129, HB4163, HB4187, HB4238, HB4454, HB4588, HB4643, HB4738, HB4739, HB4945, HB5015, HB5616, HB1749, HB1775, HB 118, HB1762, HB2520, HB24, HB45, HB15, HB35, HB38, HB47, HB318, HB349, HB554, HB1359, HB1373, HB1647, HB2254, HB2259, HB2853, HB3073, HB3088, HB353, HB355, HB786, HB762, HB705, HB932, HB849, HB 1160, HB 1119, HB1612, HB3041, HB713, HB3104, HB3970, HB3962, HB5061, HB4042, HB4115, HB4490, HB1731, HB1705, HB2607, HB3556, HB138, HB3689, HB1788, HB1887, HB1914, HB2402, HB2306, HB1809, HB2350, HB3000, HB3237, HB3326, HB3211, HB 1056, HB2081, HB2187, HB3092, HB3308, HB3526, HB3750, HB3527, HB4219, HB4230, HB4290, HB5238, HB4804, HB4749, HCR6, HCR12, HCR34, HCR50, HCR55, HCR58, HCR70, HCR71, HCR72, HCR74, HCR75, HCR78, HCR80, HCR93, HCR100, HCR107, HCR116, HCR117, HCR90

Keywords: zoning, public notice, local government, residential development, protests, peer support, first responders, mental health, confidentiality, emergency services, information network, health services, client referral, data privacy, disaster preparedness, accreditation, community services, sexual assault, victim rights, forensic examination