Video & Transcript Research : 'emissions limits'

Page 11 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, we will have a two-minute time limit.
  • there is a need to look at a limited there is a need to look at a limited regulated<00:36:02.000
  • This could limit our desire to grow the sector.” “This could limit our desire to grow the sector.
  • fund to be used for qualified limited contractors.
  • <02:18:51.760> um be used for qualified limited um be used for qualified limited um contractors
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1846, relating to shoreline mitigation districts. DLNR and the Office of Planning opposed the bill, arguing it would improperly shift regulatory roles between the agencies and prioritize private land interests over public trust and natural and historic resources. Supporters, including the Shoreline Preservation Coalition, Kahana Bay residents, and Hawaii Realtors, said regional planning is needed to address severe erosion, especially in Kahana, and that better coordination between state and county agencies could help move stalled projects forward. Testifiers emphasized that shoreline conditions vary by area and that science-based, region-specific solutions are needed. Members asked questions about whether existing law already allows regional planning and emergency shoreline responses. DLNR said it already has authority to process regional projects and cited an existing draft EIS for Kahana Bay that would proceed through normal permitting and public hearing channels. Supporters responded that the bill would provide a clearer regional planning framework and help communities facing urgent erosion impacts. No vote was taken on HB 1846 in the portion provided. The committee then took up HB 2205, relating to emergency erosion mitigation. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it already has authority to issue emergency permits and had recently done so quickly for a collapsed sidewalk at Queen Surf Beach, and warning that the bill’s language could weaken Act 16 by changing a prohibition on shoreline hardening to a requirement to merely minimize it. Kahana Bay representatives and other supporters argued the bill would create a limited, regulated short-term pathway for emergency shoreline solutions while long-term plans are developed, and said current permits have expired or stalled, leaving dangerous sandbags and no practical relief. Additional testimony from a private homeowner stressed that erosion is threatening homes and that private owners are often bearing the cost of protecting public shoreline access. The discussion remained focused on balancing emergency protection, public access, and long-term shoreline management, and no final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

TRS-LBT, TRS-EDT, TRS Public Hearings 02-10-2026

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • And for those testifiers, we ask that you stand on your written testimony or limit your oral testimony
  • But at 6.5, it's fairly limited.
  • But at 6.5, it's fairly limited.
  • And so if it's it's fairly limited.
  • Speed limit fines can be anywhere from $167 to $317.
Summary: The joint committees on Transportation, Labor and Technology, and later Transportation and Economic Development and Tourism, heard several bills. SB 2573 would allow administrative driver’s license revocation hearings to be held by interactive conference technology such as Zoom and permit electronic exchange of evidence. The chief adjudicator for the ADLRO supported it as a non-mandatory option that has worked well since 2021, improving attendance and saving time and money; DOT also supported it. The committees voted to pass SB 2573 with technical, non-substantive amendments. SB 3215 would make permanent the requirement that securing mooring lines at commercial docks be performed by labor subject to collective bargaining by repealing the sunset date in existing harbor safety law. DOT did not submit testimony, and the chair noted support from longshore labor. The committees voted to pass SB 3215 unamended. The committees also heard SB 2693, which authorizes $15 million in general obligation bonds for planning, design, and construction of a 50,000-square-foot aerospace hangar and related facilities at Hilo International Airport. A Phoenix Space executive testified in support, saying Hawaii and Hilo have geographic advantages and that the project could support aerospace investment and jobs; several other organizations and individuals submitted supportive testimony. Committee members questioned whether federal matching funds or airport capacity existed, and DOT said it had no assurance of federal participation and would need to check on capacity and potential users. The hearing then moved to SB 2698, which would create a cruise ship special fund and impose a per-passenger head fee on cruise ships docking in state commercial harbors while repealing the existing cruise ship TAT framework effective January 1, 2026. DOT supported the bill but requested amendments to clarify that the new fee is in addition to existing passenger, port entry, and dockage fees and to raise the fee from $6.50 to $10; DOT said the higher amount would better fund harbor improvements such as shore power. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings testified in support but said the added fee would significantly increase costs, while a local ship supply business supported the cruise industry and opposed the TAT approach, saying cruise activity benefits local farmers and jobs. No final vote on SB 2698 was taken in the excerpt provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It collects feeds from federal partners, correlates them to limit threats, and posts actionable alerts
  • Their limits. We've got to tighten it up if we're going to have a command.
  • We also adjust the Texas Juvenile Justice Department and its board to a limited review in... 2027, allowing
  • This bill also, in the substitute, removes the limited review of the State Soil and Water Conservation
  • The substitute also adds a contingent limited scope review of the Texas Funeral Services Commission for
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Apr 9th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • The day creates a built-in limitation.
  • I'm happy to discuss further, so I know you have a two-minute time limit.
  • I won't repeat testimony, but basically, it's an issue of whether you want to provide quality or limit
  • In child care, and certainly not quality child care, their options are limited to lower quality.
  • They typically limit the buyer to returning the puppy and getting a replacement.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Apr 9th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • We will be limiting testimony to two minutes. Where's the clock? Please show the clock, okay.
  • Without having the limit on their children and just being more sensible and sensitive. for kids with
  • attached to audio images, video, or document to increasing transparency without moderating content or limiting
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Revenue and Taxation Feb 23rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • They are limited to the tax credit assigned to their income category.
  • tax credit, making sure we give parents the most options available in our nice tax credit, fairly limited
  • practice of selective appraising is the norm for some of these 11% counties and those that rely on very limited
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I insisted that we limit our Spending, and we built up our savings account.
  • Like in 1889, Oklahoma is once again attracting new pioneers because of our commitment to limited government
  • This challenge isn't new, and it isn't limited to early literacy.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There will be no limit on school suspensions, but placements will be reviewed every 15 days.
  • I believe I'm speaking from limited conversations with Leach, but that's what makes sense.
  • This student is very dangerous, and I'm limited in what options I have at my disposal.
  • It's important for senators to recognize that this provision is actually fairly limited; it is limited
  • Yes, what we might call zero tolerance, we might also refer to as limited disruption.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • While the bill codifies TCHAT, limited telemedicine visits can only go so far.
  • This led to increased frustration, continued issues with behavior, and limited academic success.
  • Uplift prioritizes its limited budget dollars on where we see our greatest return on college and career
  • These restrictions limit the potential development of the UT Austin Academic Medical Center site and
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • It would create a further strain on limited resources at governing agencies, resulting in further delays
  • It's 87.24 acres in Montgomery County, located partially within the incorporated limits and partially
  • Cities already have the authority to purchase, establish, and manage cemeteries within their limits if
  • Today, we're now bringing the cemeteries inside the city's city limits for what purpose?
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
Summary: The committee heard testimony and took action on several land use, housing, municipal utility district, and cemetery-related bills. House Bill 447, dealing with transportation impact analysis requirements tied to MUD bond issuance, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the sponsor’s closing remarks, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1202, on third-party review of home backup power installations, was substituted and reported favorably to the full House by a unanimous roll call. House Bill 2494, on disannexation for failure to provide municipal services, and House Bill 1835, removing barriers to HUD-code manufactured homes, were also substituted and reported favorably; HB 1835 passed on a 5-1 vote. Senate Bill 15, limiting lot size and density requirements in certain large municipalities, was substituted and reported favorably unanimously. The committee also heard House Bill 897, which would authorize the sale or long-term lease of two state-owned Austin properties used by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission and HHSC. The sponsor said the properties are in poor condition and that proceeds would benefit the state; after questions, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. Several template MUD bills were then laid out, including HB 5652, HB 5654, HB 5661, and HB 5656, each creating or authorizing municipal utility districts in Montgomery or Fort Bend counties for water, wastewater, drainage, road, and recreational improvements. These bills drew limited testimony in support and were left pending without objection. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would repeal last session’s change allowing new cemeteries within certain distances of municipalities and restore the prior rule limiting cemetery placement near growing urban areas. The sponsor and supporters argued the 2023 change created unintended consequences, removed valuable taxable land from future use, and complicated city planning; opponents, including a funeral service industry representative, argued the current law gives communities local control and helps address cemetery land shortages. After extensive testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard HB 4753, a bill allowing a property owner to use a municipal record showing a certificate of occupancy was issued when the original document is lost; it was left pending. Finally, HB 3680, a Cameron County-specific bill modifying subdivision/model rule procedures to reduce replatting burdens while preserving colonia protections, and HB 4812, clarifying that condominiums follow Chapter 82 of the Property Code rather than full subdivision platting, both received supportive testimony and were left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025 at 09:04 am

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Today, we're now bringing the cemeteries inside the city's city limits for what purpose?
  • The city limits, the city grew to the... Fort Sam Houston did as well at the time.
  • The city limits, the city grew to the cemetery.
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on a series of land use, housing, and local government bills. House Bill 447, relating to TIA requirements for certain MUD bond issuances, drew opposition from a witness who argued it would duplicate work already done, strain agency resources, and delay development; after the author’s closing, the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. The committee then voted out Senate Bill 1202 (third-party review of home backup power installations), House Bill 2494 (disannexation for failure to provide services), House Bill 1835 (removing barriers to HUD co-manufactured homes), and Senate Bill 15 (lot size and density limits in certain municipalities), with House Bill 1835 receiving one no vote and the others passing unanimously. House Bill 897, authorizing sale or lease of two state-owned Austin properties, was laid out and left pending after brief questions and no public testimony. The committee also heard and left pending several MUD creation bills for Montgomery and Fort Bend counties, including House Bills 5652, 5654, 5661, and 5656, each presented as template district bills with local support and no opposition recorded at the table. A major portion of the meeting focused on House Bill 2673, which would restore prior restrictions on new cemeteries near growing urban areas by repealing changes made last session. Representative Lujan and supporters argued the current law created unintended consequences, including loss of developable land, tax-exempt property in urban cores, and conflicts with infrastructure planning; they said cities already have authority to establish their own cemeteries if needed. Opponents, including a funeral services industry representative, argued the 2023 change was intended to let communities decide and that the bill would take local decision-making backward. After extensive testimony from both sides, the bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 3680, which would create a Cameron County-specific process allowing local discretion under the model subdivision rules. Supporters said the bill would preserve colonia protections while reducing costly platting and replatting burdens on families trying to sell or pass down land; county officials and realtors testified in favor. The bill was left pending after closing. House Bill 4812, a clarification to the Texas Uniform Condominium Act to prevent counties from imposing subdivision platting requirements on condominiums, received support from builders and a condominium attorney who said current county practices create duplicative hurdles and higher costs; it too was left pending. Finally, House Bill 5148, which would allow certain single-stair apartment buildings up to six stories, generated the most detailed policy debate. Supporters, including housing advocates and architects, said the bill would lower costs, improve unit design, and expand affordable, family-friendly housing while maintaining safety through sprinklers and other safeguards. Fire officials from Corpus Christi opposed the bill, warning that a single stairwell could hinder firefighting and occupant evacuation, especially if sprinklers fail or smoke spreads. The author said the bill was aimed at new construction only and was part of a broader effort to reduce outdated housing regulations; the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending at adjournment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Today, we're now bringing the cemeteries inside the city limits for what purpose?
  • Start within the city limits.
  • City limits. The city grew to the... Fort Sam Houston did as well at the time.
  • City limits, the city grew to the cemetery.
  • For hundreds of years, it's been outside the city limits where cemeteries could start.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 17th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Public testimony will be limited to two minutes. Yeah, 15, HB3897.
  • I have limited benefits compared to municipality employees who do get benefits.
  • District Utility District that is or will be within the corporate limits of both the city of Mustang
  • The district is located in Austin County and is within the corporate limits of the city of Sealy.
  • The committee substitute limits the scope to counties adjacent to high population areas and allows commissioners
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Transportation Mar 27th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • cross commercial traffic or you also regular traffic, we do cross regular traffic, but it's very limited
  • Now with all these commercial trucks and the limited number of regular vehicles that also cross from
  • private, so, the private bridges are allowed to bring a tandem, a tandem trailer over, and, and so the limit
  • This bill addresses the maximum weight limits for vehicles traveling on public highways near the Farr
  • Enforcing weight limits is crucial for preserving the integrity of the bridge and surrounding infrastructure
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Mar 27th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • No, no, we do cross regular traffic, but it's very limited.
  • Now, with all these commercial trucks and the limited number of regular vehicles that also cross, as
  • So the private bridges are allowed to bring a tandem trailer over, and the limit on the weight is 120,000
  • This bill addresses the maximum weight limits for vehicles traveling on public highways near the Pharr
  • Enforcing weight limits is crucial for preserving the integrity of the bridge and ensuring safe travel
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Jan 28th, 2025

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • emissions intensity standards.
  • First, the statewide greenhouse gas emission limits that are identified in this bill are consistent with
  • Emissions.
  • So by limiting these emissions, do we limit economic prosperity with that course of action?
  • gas emissions.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • What strategies could projects implement to limit the co-pollutant emissions?
  • One is just the emission reductions.
  • One is just the emission reductions.
  • One is just the emission reductions.
  • Is 100% zero-emission sales by 2035.
Summary: The committee hearing focused heavily on CARB’s broad trailer bill request for regulatory fee authority. Finance and CARB argued the proposal would let CARB develop fees to recover reasonable costs for implementing and enforcing regulations, while the LAO recommended rejection because the authority was too broad, could apply to an entire division of code, and would delegate core legislative taxing/fee-setting power without enough guardrails. Members from both parties raised concerns about the breadth of the authority, accountability, affordability impacts, and whether the Legislature would be put in an up-or-down position after CARB had already developed regulations. CARB responded that fees would still go through a budget change proposal and legislative approval before collection, and cited existing examples such as transport refrigeration units and commercial harborcraft fees. The committee then reviewed CARB’s request for permanent resources to implement SB 905 on carbon capture, utilization, storage, and carbon dioxide removal. CARB said the Legislature had previously authorized limited-term positions and funding, but it had struggled to recruit and retain staff with specialized regulatory and technical expertise, and that the work had included pre-rulemaking contracts, technology review, and permit-related preparation. Members questioned the pace of work, the use of limited-term positions, and whether additional permitting authority would be needed. CARB said it hoped to begin rulemaking later in the year if permanent resources were approved. Members also discussed the cap-and-trade spending plan, noting lower-than-expected auction revenues but higher interest earnings, and the need to monitor the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and possible May Revision changes. The committee then heard overviews of the zero-emission vehicle package, the Community Air Protection Program, demand-side grid support, and e-bike incentives. CARB described ongoing investments in community-based transportation equity, drayage trucks, harbor craft, and other clean technology demonstrations, while members pressed on affordability, program duplication, and whether enough funding was being directed to incentive programs. No formal votes were taken during the portion provided, and the chair repeatedly indicated that the hearing was intended to surface concerns for later budget negotiations.