Video & Transcript Research : 'tall structures'
Page 118 of 459
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (01/20/2026)
Environment and Agriculture
Transcript Highlights:
- It's sort of like when you have a farmhouse and you keep adding structures to it, and it just sort of
- These programs have to be structured in a way that brings all producers to the table, because you do
- So they're they're<03:17:52.319>
structured <03:17:52.880>in <03:17:53.040>a <03: - 17:53.279>
way <03:17:53.600>to <03:17:53.920>ensure they're structured in a way - program to help and support a structured program to help mitigate<04:50:14.000>
those.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
ECD Public Hearing - Wed Mar 18, 2026 @ 8:30 AM HST
Economic Development & Technology
Transcript Highlights:
- :51:40.800>
um any sort of um any sort of um um<00:51:43.240>tax <00:51:43.600>structure - um tax structure um tax structure a<00:51:45.200>
lot <00:51:45.520>of <00:51:45.680 - c> um and you know, the way in which um and you know, the way in which creates<00:55:02.400>
structures - which ultimately can creates structures which ultimately can be<00:55:03.840>
unsustainable <00 - of a comprehensive data structure of a comprehensive data privacy<01:02:34.960>
law.
Keywords:
permit processing, permitting reform, county permits, development permits, building permits, land use, construction delays, housing development, infrastructure development, county workforce, differential pay, salary incentive, performance bonus, recruitment and retention, expedited hiring, vacancy rates, permit backlog, government modernization, county mayor, county council
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on several Senate bills, with most measures drawing broad support and a few generating significant opposition or policy questions. SB 2908 SD1 and SB 2671 SD1 were taken up first; both appeared to have majority support, with SB 2908 receiving seven in support, one in opposition, and one comment, and SB 2671 receiving five in support and two comments. SB 3085 SD2, related to film industry operations, drew 11 supporters and no opposition. Georgia Skinner explained that the bill would streamline the approval timeline for productions by reducing delays tied to Land Board review, and she said DLNR supported the effort. Committee members asked about the need for the change and the relationship between the film studio, DLNR, and the approval process.
The committee then discussed SB 2907 SD1, which would create an Office of Marine Affairs. Testimony was largely supportive, including from DLNR, HTDC, the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity, ocean industry representatives, and others. The governor’s office supported the bill’s intent but objected to placing the office within the Office of the Governor, urging instead that it be housed at HTDC. HTDC said it was willing and excited to take on the work and described ongoing stakeholder engagement. Members asked about the rationale for the placement and the long-term structure of the office.
SB 2353 SD2, concerning the Aloha Stadium district and billboard/naming-rights issues, drew strong opposition overall, with four in support, 23 in opposition, and one comment. Andrew Pereira of the Stadium Authority argued the measure could generate revenue to help maintain and operate the stadium and said the district would remain self-contained; he also emphasized that the development would respect the character of the area. The committee then heard SB 2074 SD1, which had five in support and 26 in opposition; only one support testimony from the Carpenters was heard before the discussion moved on. Finally, SB 2360 SD1, an enterprise zones measure, received 14 supportive testimonies and two comments. Testimony focused on updating the program for modern business models, especially e-commerce and direct-to-consumer sales, while committee members questioned whether the program overlaps with higher tax burdens and whether businesses receiving subsidies should be monitored for job retention after graduation from the program.
DE
Transcript Highlights:
- movement and corrections we have, the less confidence people are going to have in the overall tax structure
- This bill represents a complex structural overhaul.
- This bill represents a complex structural overhaul, not something that can be fully evaluated and responsibly
- will require all counties and municipalities to reset current tax rates, rebuild their assessment structures
- classification framework and is not intended to address, or is not designed to address, agricultural land or structures
Bills:
HB371
Keywords:
HB371, Delaware Agricultural Lands Preservation Act, farmland preservation, agricultural lands, agricultural preservation district, Farmland Preservation Advisory Board, county advisory board, Delaware Foundation, Department of Agriculture, DNREC, planning and zoning, growth zone, open space, land use, farmland protection, rural land preservation, agribusiness, active farmers
Summary:
The Senate Executive Committee met in hybrid format, approved the minutes from its June 17 and June 18 meetings, and considered several nominations and bills. The committee heard testimony from Michael T. Skeuse for the Delaware Thoroughbred Racing Commission and Jay Eric Fearwald for the University of Delaware Board of Trustees; both nominees described their backgrounds and qualifications, and no objections were raised. The committee then moved to legislation focused largely on property tax reassessment and related school-tax issues, along with a technical constitutional corrections bill, an agricultural lands preservation cleanup bill, and a child-safety/service-letter bill.
A major portion of the meeting centered on Senate Bill 350, which would create a third multifamily residential tax classification at 1.2 times the residential rate. Supporters argued apartments are housing and should not be taxed as commercial property, emphasizing relief for renters and fairness after reassessment. Opponents, including county and school officials, warned the bill would reduce local revenues, complicate tax administration, and create unintended consequences for counties, municipalities, school districts, and agriculture. Similar themes carried into House Bill 462, which would make the split-rate school tax structure permanent and lower the nonresidential cap to 1.85, and House Bill 463, which would align New Castle County senior school-tax exemptions with county exemption rules; both bills drew discussion about shifting burdens, fiscal impacts, and timing.
The committee also heard House Substitute 1 for House Bill 320, a technical corrections bill to the Delaware Constitution, with one public commenter objecting to charter-related changes being included in a correction bill. House Bill 371, which removes the requirement for county farmland preservation advisory boards under the Delaware Agricultural Lands Preservation Act, was presented as a streamlining measure and had support from the Department of Agriculture and public comment in favor. House Bill 438, expanding service-letter requirements to a broader set of child-serving facilities and requiring reporting when employers fail to respond, was described as a cleanup bill closing a safety loophole. After public comment and committee discussion, the meeting ended with a motion and unanimous adjournment; no recorded votes on the bills were taken in the transcript.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government
Transcript Highlights:
- We would think possibly that same kind of structure that we provided for, We would think possibly that
- same kind of structure that we provided for our regional communication system.
- connection of new irrigation systems to the public water supply, and we've implemented an escalating rate structure
- connection of new irrigation systems to the public water supply, and we've implemented an escalating rate structure
- meaningful engagement with key stakeholders, public feedback, and a thorough analysis of the commission structure
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government held its first hearing of the year and took testimony on a large slate of home rule petitions and related local bills. Early testimony focused on H. 2314 for the Dukes County Regional Lockup Fund, with supporters from Martha’s Vineyard saying the island’s lockup is essential to local policing and that the fund would be supported by town assessments rather than state money. The committee also heard support for S. 21, a Nantucket bill to amend the Nantucket Planning and Economic Development Commission, and for several local governance measures including Akushnet’s charter change to remove a two-year waiting period for former officials taking appointed paid positions, Rochester’s governance reform bill defining the town administrator’s role, Berkeley’s proposal to convert the treasurer-collector position to an appointed office, Hanson’s permitting enforcement bill, and a Wellfleet bill authorizing a lease for the food pantry.
A major portion of the hearing centered on S. 21 for Nantucket, with witnesses sharply divided. Supporters argued the commission needs broader representation, more transparency, and a structure that better reflects town meeting votes, citing repeated town meeting approvals and frustration with delays in bringing reforms forward. Opponents, including current commission members and staff, said the existing commission is already working on its own reform proposal, that the bill was advanced without sufficient collaboration, and that elected seats and term limits would narrow participation and complicate the commission’s advisory role. Committee members questioned both sides about the town meeting process, the commission’s responsibilities, and the timing of competing proposals.
The committee also heard testimony in favor of a bill allowing the Cotuit Fire District to pursue source-water protection projects on private property with owner consent, citing concerns about aquifer contamination and rising treatment needs, and in support of legislation requiring AEDs, with a Norfolk County register of deeds describing the low cost and life-saving value of the devices. Another witness spoke in favor of a regional commission proposal for Middlesex County, arguing that local communities need stronger regional planning tools to address development and environmental pressures. No votes were taken on the bills during the hearing; the chair later read many additional bills into the record and then adjourned the meeting.
AR
Arkansas 2026 1st Special Session
ALC-HOSPITAL, MEDICAID, & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE Jun 18th, 2026
ALC-HOSPITAL, MEDICAID, & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE
Transcript Highlights:
- mentioned, that they're really important because they're going to move toward a more seamless governance structure
- And right now, with the local board structure, that does not happen.
- Whereas you can build, and we can make recommendations around this, a true sort of regional oversight structure
- And so, again, the idea is how do we create an efficient oversight structure, an efficient delivery structure
Summary:
The committee met to hear an update from consultants Mason Bishop and Cameron Christie on Arkansas’s “one door” or “no wrong door” workforce and social services modernization effort. The discussion focused on moving the state toward a work-first system that better connects job seekers, employers, education, and public assistance programs, with goals of increasing upward mobility, improving labor force attachment, reducing inefficiencies, and adapting to changes such as AI and other economic disruptions. The consultants argued that Arkansas’s current system is fragmented across multiple offices, portals, agencies, and funding streams, and that people often have to navigate separate doors for workforce services, TANF, SNAP, Medicaid, and related supports.
Bishop repeatedly pointed to Utah as the model, describing how that state integrated workforce and human services into a single department, used cost allocation to blend funding behind the scenes, and saw improved customer service and outcomes after reform. He said TANF should be treated as a workforce program, not just a benefits program, and suggested that Arkansas could use TANF and other tools to cross-train DHS staff, co-locate services, and create a more unified service delivery model. Members asked about federal flexibility, waivers, and whether the state could use one large waiver or a broader restructuring to simplify the system. Bishop explained that a federal pilot authority proposal failed in Congress, so the current approach relies on waivers, cost allocation plans, and possible state-level changes.
The committee also discussed the relationship between DHS and workforce offices, the role of local workforce boards, how disability and vocational rehabilitation cases would be handled, and how the governor’s Restore Hope/Hope Hub and faith- and community-based initiatives might fit into the broader plan. Bishop said Arkansas already has rehabilitation services within the workforce department and emphasized that case managers should focus on people rather than programs. No votes were taken. The chair said the committee would revisit case management at its August meeting and adjourned the meeting after thanking the consultants.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Appropriations and Budget 2nd Revision: Oklahoma Department of Transportation will present at 10:30 a.m.
Appropriations and Budget
Transcript Highlights:
- see in our fatality numbers, but that will not stop us from continuing Sustained less than 1% structurally
- on a journey to try to get what it was at that time, almost 18% of all of our bridges that were Structurally
- deficient out of 6,800, almost 1,200 were what we call structurally deficient.
- billion dollars in ramps that serve interchanges, $11.41 billion as our bridges, and our ancillary structures
- You know, they're not structurally deficient, but they don't have a lot of life cycle left in them.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
Restrictive Housing Legislative Working Group 08-21-2025
Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- So, we went through the personal introductions, but just wanted to kind of review the membership structure
- So the way this act is structured is to provide both a delayed implementation, an opportunity to make
- So the way this act<00:17:45.760>
is <00:17:46.000>structured <00:17:46.960>is <00 to <00:17:47.600>provide <00:17:48.080>both <00:17:48.320>a act is structured- is to provide both a act is structured is to provide both a delayed<00:17:48.960>
implementation,
Summary:
The Restrictive Housing Legislative Working Group held its first meeting on August 21, 2025, to organize under Act 292, which directs the group to review and recommend laws, policies, and procedures on restrictive housing for vulnerable populations, including older adults, people with disabilities, people with serious mental illness, those with sensory impairments, and people perceived to be LGBTQIA+. Co-chairs Sen. Brandon Elefante and Rep. Della Au Belatti outlined the group’s purpose, membership, and timeline, noting the final recommendations are due to the Legislature by January 8, 2027. Members and invited participants introduced themselves, including legislative members, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation staff, the Department of Health, the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission, ACLU of Hawaii, Community Alliance on Prisons, UPW, and an OHA representative in the audience.
The working group discussed its initial focus and agreed that a first priority should be understanding current restrictive housing practices at DCR, including policies on solitary confinement, training, reporting, and how the department currently handles vulnerable populations. Co-chair Belatti said the group should also hear from people with lived experience, including incarcerated individuals and family members affected by solitary confinement, and review litigation, settlements, and outside expert work on best practices. DCR Director Tommy Johnson, appearing by Zoom, said the bill contains specific implementation timelines and that the group should use future meetings to surface topics tied to the act’s requirements. Rep. Shimizu asked how the working group’s recommendations would fit with SB 104 and whether they would supersede existing provisions; Belatti responded that the act allows time for review and for both departmental policy changes and legislative recommendations, with section two’s implementation date set for July 1, 2026.
Public comment was limited, with no online testimony. An OHA representative thanked the chairs and said the office looked forward to participating once formally designated. House legislative attorney Sean Aronson suggested the group should hear about any outside or court-mandated oversight of DCR in a future presentation. A member of the working group also asked about scheduling an in-person visit to a correctional facility, and the chairs said that could be arranged with DCR. The group tentatively scheduled its next meeting for October 16, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., noted that September would be skipped, and discussed holding future meetings on third Thursdays. The meeting ended with thanks to staff and adjournment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- were not super onerous, and the issue is in the last line of the bill that undoes a strong penalty structure
- Texas has a uniquely strong penalty structure for price transparency requirements that allows, if I,
- The, the penalty structure in Texas allows for penalties for the largest hospitals who are not in compliance
- effort to, uh, make that change, and if that change is made to keep in place that strong penalty structure
- testifying on today, only because in this bill and its present or with its present cumulative penalty structure
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Third, there are certain financial structures used by Chinese companies listed in the United States that
- Alipay just moved the company out of that structure into a different one and said, "Tough luck, Yahoo
- continue to protect these Chinese entities that have very shady and potentially illegal financial structures
- Within months of that, they told American investors and structured funds the same way, to triple or quadruple
- market unto themselves, and when they are doing things like that, it creates massive incentive structures
Keywords:
HB 128, sister city, sister-city agreement, international exchange, municipal diplomacy, local government, state agency, political subdivision, foreign adversary, China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Taiwan, major non-NATO ally, cultural exchange, educational exchange, tourism, bilateral cooperation, foreign relations
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Emergency Management Committee Apr 28th, 2025
Emergency Management
Transcript Highlights:
- contracts on a bid or negotiated basis for construction materials commonly used in residential structures
- report from the San Francisco Chronicle recent fires in Los Angeles County devastated construction structures
- Currently, public works agencies lack structured mutual aid agreements, unlike their other counterparts
- By establishing clear, structured, mandatory local coordination, AB591 ensures faster recovery, more
- Right now the state lacks a structured system to routinely test and evaluate these plans across agencies
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- federal and state resources designated for this purpose, as well as proposed tenant rent payment structures
- Oftentimes, the hotel management structure is a third party.
- This structure allows the program to expand access to home ownership for eligible professions without
- We have a similar funding structure as the one proposed in this bill to support emergency housing vouchers
- The program is well structured to be used for a variety of potential needs.
Bills:
HB158, HB714, HB 1198, HB1630, HB1998, HB3509, HB3788, HB3875, HB3948, HB3977, HB4097, HB4313, HB4314, HB4317, HB158
Keywords:
housing, veterans, surplus government property, affordable housing, funding sources, housing assistance, homeless prevention, landlord incentives, rural housing, domestic violence, community development, tenant readiness, program participants, financial assistance, homelessness, rental support, Texas Tenant Readiness Program, tenant assistance, housing stability, Texas Department of Housing
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration Mar 18th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- This initiative aims to promote equitable access to high paying jobs by addressing structural barriers
- several existing programs, how does the department expect this proposal to work within the existing structure
- So, that's the framing for why this program is structured that way, why it's been so successful in meeting
- So the way the program is structured is students commit to serve 450 hours while they're in school during
- So the way the program is structured is to really make college affordable to those students who need
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security Feb 18th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- GROWTH THANKS TO THE GREAT SUPPORT OF OUR GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE IN OUR CHALLENGES GAINING THE STRUCTURE
- ANOTHER CASEY WHITE INITIATIVE IS APPRENTICESHIPS VETERANS EXPERIENCE STRUCTURED TRAINING PROGRAM STRICTLY
- Collins: LET'S TAKE UP TAB 1 SM 314 ON FLORIDA NATIONAL GUARD INCREASED STRUCTURE BY OUR ONE AND ONLY
- BUREAU TO EXAMINE RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS OF THE FLORIDA NATIONAL GUARD AND ALLOW AND INCREASED IT IT'S STRUCTURE
- COMMITMENT SERVING NOT ONLY VETERANS BUT ALSO OUR NATIONAL GUARD MEMBERS AND MAKING SURE THAT THE PROPER STRUCTURE
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Municipal and County Government (01/30/2026)
Municipal and County Government
Transcript Highlights:
- :33:32.080>
a <00:33:32.240>taxable structured, they become a taxable structured, they - moment with the way the is structured. moment with the way the is structured. um um um the<00:34
- not merely imprecise, but structurally not merely imprecise, but structurally untethered<00:40:39.839
- HB1 1380 is They need structural reform.
- c> clarity<04:06:54.000>
matters structure is uncommon, clarity matters structure is uncommon
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- It's not structured that way. So, again, it's intended to be there in case there...
- Do you see a difference in rate structure between those large entities and some of your smaller ones
- So that is the structure that we're working under here in Texas, and that's what TDI adheres to, is very
- So I understand that your office was trying to structure an agreement that would encourage people—I'm
- Asked us to look at how our proposed structure compared to other states, and that was when—around May
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:17:21.520>
of <00:17:21.600>the but that's the structure of the but that's the - structure of the spreadsheet.
- , structures, structures, improve<01:00:07.920>
enforcement <01:00:08.440>tools <01:00:08.760 - And it has to do with cannabis events license organizer license structure.
- that have been set up around structures that have been set up around these<01:13:46.160>
kinds
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Primary and Secondary Education. (3-18-26)
Primary and Secondary Education
Transcript Highlights:
- There's not a real structure to it.
- And so, this is an attempt to put some more structure into the program and principal leadership.
- <00:58:01.480>
to board lacks committee structure to board lacks committee structure to provide - When it comes to the make-up, the structure of our school board, the concern there is generally that,
- When it comes to the make-up, the structure of our school board, the concern there is generally that,
MO
Transcript Highlights:
- The of how the fund structure is going to be broken out for that.
- Just a couple of questions, more on the structure.
- They all structured the same? Oh, no.
- Yeah, because it says with an outcomes-based funding structure.
- There are different structures in the fire code. Assembly is a special occupancy.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Budget Review Subcommittee on Health and Family Service (11-5-25)
Transcript Highlights:
- But if it wasn't built on that structure, there would have to be another structure, either a double,
- But if it wasn't built on that structure, there would have to be another structure, either a double,
- <00:23:01.760>
So <00:23:02.320>So what the the payment structure is. - So So what the the payment structure is.
- , there would have to be uh structure, there would have to be another<00:23:10.159>
structure,
Summary:
The Budget Review Subcommittee on Health and Family Services met in person, approved the October 15 minutes, and began with a moment of silence following a Louisville UPS plane explosion that was described as a local tragedy affecting many families and first responders. The main presentation was an overview of Kentucky’s Medicaid non-emergency medical transportation (NMT) program from the Department for Medicaid Services and the Transportation Cabinet. Witnesses explained that NMT is a federally required Medicaid benefit, administered by the Transportation Cabinet under a risk-based capitated model, with eligibility limited to Medicaid members traveling to medically necessary, Medicaid-covered services and who lack access to other transportation. They also described exclusions, including certain KCHIP, QMB, and PACE members, and outlined the brokered regional structure, call center operations, scheduling rules, vehicle and driver oversight, complaint handling, and rider surveys.
The presenters reported that NMT handled more than 3.1 million trips in state fiscal year 2024, with over 1.38 million trips already recorded in October, and said customer satisfaction surveys were high. They said the FY 2025-26 contract total is about $360.6 million, with monthly per-member capitation rates set by region through an actuarial process and approved by CMS. They emphasized that payments are tied to monthly Medicaid enrollment and that the state draws down federal funds for the exact amount paid, with no leftover balance. They also said most NMT use comes from adult day centers and rehabilitative care such as dialysis.
Members questioned the witnesses about how quality metrics and contract standards are set, whether the state had explored alternatives such as Uber Health or other integrated models, and how utilization was calculated. The witnesses said contract requirements are developed collaboratively by Medicaid Services, the Transportation Cabinet, and other agencies, and that studies of other models generally found higher costs and lower approval ratings, with additional research on a hybrid model expected by the end of the year. They clarified that one figure reflected the share of Medicaid members with registered vehicles, while another reflected actual NMT users, and they defended the capitated structure as shifting financial risk to brokers rather than the state. Representative Fleming also raised concerns about oversight, reporting, and the apparent gap between budgeted and contracted amounts, asking whether any unused funds would return to general funds; the discussion ended before a final answer was given.
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Interim Joint Committee on Local Government (6-24-25) - Reupload
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, it put a mandate structure in place that said basically three things.
- Um it put a mandate structure counties.
- They did a great job setting up a structure getting the checks to the counties.
- , enacted, uh the rates, uh the structure, enacted, uh the rates, uh the structure, those<01:04:08.480
- Let's talk a little bit more particularly about each of those and their legal structure.
Keywords:
Meeting Start: 00:00:00
Roll Call 00:00:11
Discussion of County Clerks’ Land Records Update 00:02:42
Discussion of Area Development Districts 00:22:48
Discussion of Legislative Measures 00:50:09
Discussion of Local Taxing Sources 01:02:33
Adjournment 01:29:16, 958, all
Summary:
The committee first took up an update from the Kentucky County Clerks Association on the transition to electronic recording and land records modernization. Testimony explained that legislation from the 2021 task force created funding and deadlines for counties to provide online search portals and complete a 30-year property record search, with a later move to a 60-year standard. Speakers said the money has been awarded to counties, but much of the work is still in progress because records must be scanned, indexed, and manually verified. They said only a handful of counties are fully compliant with electronic recording so far, while many are still working through staffing and vendor issues. They also noted that the 60-year standard may ultimately be easier and more efficient to complete than the 30-year standard, and that compliance is expected to improve by next summer.
The clerks’ representatives also raised related issues, including deed fraud, the county document storage fee, and KDLA digitization grants. They said online recording can make deed fraud easier to attempt, so they expect to seek legislation next session to address it. They described an existing notification service available in many counties that alerts property owners when a document is recorded, which can help detect suspicious activity quickly. They also said the storage fee and separate county account structure has generally worked well, but that two recent KDLA grant cycles have not released money for clerks, limiting support for digitization work. Another topic was whether, once records are fully digitized and verified, some permanent records should remain publicly accessible or be moved to a safer archive under KDLA control.
Members asked about the balance in the KDLA fund, what the General Assembly could do to help lagging counties, and how much of the $25 million modernization funding had been spent. Witnesses said they did not have the current fund balance but would try to get it, that the main obstacle now appears to be staffing rather than additional money, and that the funds have been awarded but not fully expended because work is still ongoing. They emphasized that counties are helping one another and asked members to alert association leadership if any county is struggling. The committee then heard a presentation from Dan London, executive director of the Lincoln Trail Area Development District, who described area development districts as regional staff extensions and technical resources for cities and counties, and highlighted their role in coordinating regional services and partnerships across county lines.