Transcript Highlights:

• I just want to know that, you know, when we do things, we do them equally for public servants.
• I just want to know that, you know, when we do things, we do them equally for public servants.
• <00:34:46.720> So,<00:34:46.960> do them equally for public servants.
• So, do them equally for public servants.
• the law is not equally applied. the law is not equally applied.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• If they receive grant aid that equals that amount, they would be ineligible for the PEL grant.
• of state institutional and<00:24:15.600> private<00:24:15.840> aid<00:24:16.240> equals
• /c><00:24:16.640> their<00:24:16.960> in<00:24:17.440> total and private aid equals
• c><00:24:25.840> grant<00:24:26.080> aid<00:24:26.400> that<00:24:26.559> equals
• <00:24:26.880> that they receive grant aid that equals that they receive grant aid that equals

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call: 0:00:00 Approval of Minutes: 0:01:45 Federal Education Updates 0:02:12 Dual Credit Updates: 0:43:38 Kentucky State University's Doctoral Program Request: 01:27:08 Postsecondary Accreditation: 1:49:05 Consideration of Referred Administrative Regulations: 2:14:48 Adjournment 2:16:31, 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the previous meeting minutes, and heard a presentation from Austin Reid of the National Conference of State Legislatures on education-related provisions in the federal One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1). Reid said the law is projected to increase the federal deficit over 10 years, with major savings coming from Medicaid, student loan changes, and SNAP. He focused on how those changes could affect schools, including possible effects on free and reduced-price meal certification, state funding formulas that use SNAP as a proxy for low-income status, and Medicaid-funded school services for students with disabilities. Reid also outlined the new federal scholarship tax credit, which gives a dollar-for-dollar credit for donations to qualifying scholarship-granting organizations. He said families up to 300% of area median income may benefit, the program begins in 2027, and states must opt in and designate eligible organizations. He noted unresolved questions about whether states can add their own criteria and said Treasury regulations will be important. He also described the expansion of 529 plans to cover more K-12 and postsecondary expenses. On higher education, Reid explained a new workforce Pell grant option for short-term programs, with states and governors playing a role in determining eligible programs. He said the programs must meet placement, completion, and earnings measures and that implementation is expected to be tight before the July 1, 2026 effective date. He also reviewed student loan changes, including lower institutional loan limits, prorated borrowing for part-time enrollment, new caps on graduate and Parent PLUS loans, and a new earnings-based accountability standard that could make some programs ineligible for student loans if graduates earn too little. No votes were taken beyond approval of the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• <03:36:36.800> No,<03:36:37.040> it $50 doesn't really apply equally.
• No, it $50 doesn't really apply equally. No, it does<03:36:37.279> not.<03:36:37.840> No.
• More machines, more people allow for larger prizes and larger prizes equal a more attractive product.
• prizes equal a more attractive product. prizes equal a more attractive product.
• And it would be roughly equal? It would be roughly equal. 4,300 HHR, 4,300 VTs.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up SB 63, which concerns funding for the division of travel and tourism and its relationship to the meals-and-rooms tax calculation. Members asked for confirmation that the bill would not affect municipal distributions under RSA 78-A:26. Jennifer Ramsey of the Department of Revenue Administration explained that the amendment does not change meals-and-rooms distributions, but instead corrects the calculation for the travel and tourism appropriation by adding back the municipal fund transfer before applying the 3.15% floor. Chris Shay of the Office of the Attorney General agreed with that explanation. The committee also discussed the complexity of the meals-and-rooms statutes and the possibility of a future cleanup effort. The committee then voted 19-0 to recommend SB 63 ought to pass; it will not go on consent because it has a fiscal note. The committee next considered SB 60, relative to advanced deposit account wagering. Rep. Murphy moved ought to pass, explaining that the bill would regulate advanced deposit wagering on horse racing and impose a 1.25% revenue share on wagers from New Hampshire residents, generating roughly a quarter-million dollars in new lottery revenue in the first year. The motion passed 19-0, and the bill will not go on consent because of its fiscal note. The committee then voted 19-0 to recommend SB 147 ITL, with members noting that live racing facilities are in decline and the market is shrinking. SB 160, which updates raffle ticket pricing and prize limits for bingo-related gaming, also passed ought to pass 19-0 and will not go on consent. The committee then took up SB 73, which revises coverall bingo rules and increases prize limits. An amendment, 2025-1470H, was offered to raise the total prize amount to $5,000; members supported it as a reasonable compromise, and the amendment was adopted unanimously. The bill as amended then passed ought to pass 19-0, again with a fiscal note preventing consent placement. After those votes, the committee moved into a work session on SB 83, where members began discussing the bill’s video lottery terminal provisions, including the meaning of “maximum wager,” the absence of a cumulative betting cap, and concerns that the bill combines several distinct policy changes—tax treatment, VLT rules, renaming, and a self-exclusion database—into one measure. No vote was taken on SB 83 during the work session, and members indicated they would continue discussion later after reviewing side-by-side materials.

Transcript Highlights:

• The situation in assisted living facilities is equally alarming.
• training, ensures fair stakeholder input, increases accountability, and it puts elders’ rights on equal
• The situation in assisted living facilities is equally alarming.
• It is this program which serves equally well in urban and rural settings and has similar impact.
• It is this program which serves equally well in urban and rural settings and has similar impact.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Both viewpoints are equally true.
• Both viewpoints are equally true.
• Both viewpoints are equally true.
• Both viewpoints are equally true.
• Both viewpoints are equally true.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Is there a friction or tension of priority for helping one versus another, or are they equal?
• versus<00:31:57.480> another<00:31:58.000> or<00:31:58.200> the<00:31:58.399> equal
• or the equal how does this<00:31:59.799> work<00:32:00.399> I'm<00:32:00.519> just<
• On June 29, Equality Health Center and other abortion providers told the Union Leader that pre-abortion
• executive director of the equality executive director of the equality Health<02:31:56.760> Center

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill as amended shall be debatable for one hour, equally divided and controlled by the Chair and
• <02:08:23.360> divided debatable for one hour equally divided debatable for one hour equally
• The bill as amended shall be debatable for one hour, equally divided and controlled by the Chair and
• Takano, who is the chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus. never be complicit in it.
• I will fight bills like this with everything I have because equality and dignity and justice are not

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, December 18, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• equally benefit from that. equally benefit from that. >> Chair<00:31:18.080> Novanti.
• do try<00:37:13.119> to<00:37:13.280> have<00:37:13.440> an<00:37:13.680> equal
• c><00:37:13.920> playing<00:37:14.240> field<00:37:14.560> and try to have an equal
• playing field and try to have an equal playing field and I'm<00:37:15.200> not<00:37:15.599><
• playing field and equal opportunity.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• A welcome banner to this small sanctuary where everyone is equal, everyone is empowered, where they can
• ,<00:40:51.920> everyone<00:40:52.720> is where everyone is equal, everyone is where
• everyone is equal, everyone is empowered,<00:40:54.320> where<00:40:54.960> they<00:40
• I am with 603 Equality. Uh, I am here to testify in opposition to HB 132.
• I am with 603 equality. Uh I Teraveia. I am with 603 equality.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And two things can be true, and I think both of them are equally a priority, and that's something that
• both<00:25:41.960> of<00:25:42.040> them<00:25:42.200> are<00:25:42.320> equally
• c><00:25:43.240> a<00:25:43.320> priority<00:25:44.080> and both of them are equally
• But if choice is truly equal, the distribution should be too."
• equal, the distribution should be too. equal, the distribution should be too.

Bills: HF4110, HF4101, HF4144, HF3546

Keywords: workplace regulations, employee rights, meal breaks, rest breaks, exemptions, medical assistance, data matching, eligibility, reporting, human services, assisted living, health regulations, inspection authority, vulnerable adults, local government, program integrity, high-risk providers, enrollment requirements, fraud prevention, compliance

Transcript Highlights:

• ’s constitutionally protected medical decisions, courts will examine both the burden imposed and equality
• ’s constitutionally protected medical decisions, courts will examine both the burden imposed and equality
• ’s constitutionally protected medical decisions, courts will examine both the burden imposed and equality
• ’s constitutionally protected medical decisions, courts will examine both the burden imposed and equality
• stated, it is also unnecessary as equal stated, it is also unnecessary as equal informed<00:58:49.359

Bills: HB0003, HB0117, HB0041

Keywords: pregnancy centers, abortion, pro-life, healthcare, women's rights, state regulation, civil rights, freedom of speech, informed consent, civil liability, coercion, healthcare rights, law enforcement, death benefits, retirement, survivor support, public safety, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We commend the legislature for recently enacting a consumer data privacy law in an age where data equals
• We commend the legislature for recently enacting a consumer data privacy law in an age where data equals
• We commend the legislature for recently enacting a consumer data privacy law in an age where data equals
• We commend the legislature for recently enacting a consumer data privacy law in an age where data equals
• We commend the legislature for recently enacting a consumer data privacy law in an age where data equals

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee approved the October 15, 2025 minutes and then held a broader discussion on current challenges with data retention and government transparency. Judy Randall of the Office of the Legislative Auditor said historical data is essential for post-audits, which often look back three to five years, and that retention decisions must balance audit needs with the burden of separating public and nonpublic data. She described the records-retention panel process as informal and largely based on individual judgment, noting she had objected to a proposed 60-day email retention period and generally uses a three-year guideline, though she said that standard is not grounded in a formal rule. Members discussed whether auditing standards should set retention periods, with Randall saying auditing is a good starting point but other offices, including the attorney general, also have needs, and that some agency discretion is unavoidable because of the gray area between official records and non-records. Representative Elkins raised the related principle of data minimization, arguing that government should not keep data longer than needed and citing a University of Minnesota legacy data warehouse breach as an example of the risks of retaining unnecessary sensitive information. Randall agreed that data no longer needed is a liability and said her office purges workpapers after five years. Representative Scott pressed whether three years is enough for fraud investigations and financial records; Randall responded that a reasonableness standard is needed and that longer retention can produce diminishing returns, though she said she would follow up on whether financial records should be treated differently. Tanya Tacker of the Rum River Special Education Cooperative testified in support of updating Minnesota’s data-retention laws for schools. She said districts want to protect student information and maintain transparency, but the current general retention schedule dates to 1985 and 2000 and does not reflect digital records, modern systems, or the volume of special education data. She urged modernizing the schedule, clarifying what must be kept in paper versus digitized form, aligning state rules with IDEA and other federal requirements, and providing practical guidance and tools. Members praised the specificity of her recommendations. Dr. BB Newman testified that retention failures in St. Anthony Village have made it difficult to obtain routine municipal and police data, with records delayed, missing, or inconsistently produced and no clear explanation of what systems were searched or whether records were destroyed. Newman argued these gaps undermine statutory access rights and force residents into costly litigation, and recommended stronger retention auditing, documentation of destruction, mandatory disclosure of systems searched, and consequences for noncompliance. In response to questions, Senate counsel said there is generally no direct penalty, but affected parties may seek mandamus, Data Practices Act claims, or informal mediation/opinions from the Data Practices Office. The discussion closed with calls for clearer standards and possible legislative updates to improve compliance and transparency.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:46:44.000> Equally Equally essential is listening to our students.
• getting, I don't know what we're getting for it because, again, test scores seem to be relatively equal
• getting, I don't know what we're getting for it because, again, test scores seem to be relatively equal
• Are they equal on all these states? Federal things. Yeah. As far as we know, yes.
• <01:25:32.239> on federal regulations are they equal on federal regulations are they equal

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee met to hear from the New Hampshire Association of School Principals as part of its review of a proposal involving statewide administrative consolidation and changes to school governance. Members first discussed how school board witnesses would be selected, with the chair saying the committee would seek a mix of district sizes and structures and would also accept emailed input. The principals’ association said it represents more than 550 principals and assistant principals and urged caution about any mandatory consolidation, arguing that successful consolidations are gradual and voluntary. Association leaders and principals testified that principals already handle a wide range of responsibilities, including instructional leadership, student discipline, safety, staff supervision and evaluation, family and community engagement, and day-to-day crisis response. They argued that shifting more legal, budgetary, and administrative duties onto principals would reduce time for coaching teachers and supporting students, increase burnout and turnover, and create legal and training risks, especially in areas such as special education, privacy, and labor issues. They also said the roles of superintendents, principals, and school board members are distinct and require different training and expertise. Members asked detailed questions about how responsibilities are divided between principals and SAUs, whether principals recruit and evaluate staff, and how much time principals work. One principal said she works about 60 to 70 hours a week and that additional duties would be difficult to absorb. Another principal described his school’s structure, the importance of community building, and the need to preserve district-wide alignment if consolidation moves forward. No votes were taken during this portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• not be considered. motion shall be debatable for one hour motion shall be debatable for one hour equally
• 02.880> and<00:09:03.120> controlled<00:09:03.440> by<00:09:03.680> the equally
• divided and controlled by the equally divided and controlled by the chair<00:09:04.080> and<00
• We're just going to tax the net earnings on their investments at 21%, which was equal to the corporate
• to the corporate tax which was equal to the corporate tax rate.<02:38:23.680> And<02:38:23.840

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I still think education is the big equalizer in our society today.
• I still think education is the big equalizer in our society today.
• I still think education is the big equalizer in our society today.
• I still think education is the big equalizer in our society today.
• equal a win, and that's the frustration. equal a win, and that's the frustration.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony focused on barriers facing minority-owned businesses and on local programs intended to improve access to capital and contracting opportunities. A representative from the U.S. Black Chambers described disparities in minority spending, argued for more intentional and transparent investment in Black communities, and emphasized the need to disaggregate data, hold officials accountable, and expand tools such as the byBlack certification directory. He also stressed that businesses need technical assistance, resources, and opportunities to grow through mergers, consortiums, and joint ventures. The main presentation then came from Larry Forester and Tyrone of Commerce Lexington, who outlined what they called eight major barriers for minority businesses, including limited access to capital, weak mentorship networks, discrimination and bias, bureaucratic hurdles, branding and visibility challenges, stereotyping, generational knowledge gaps, and limited financial literacy. They described several Commerce Lexington initiatives: the Access Loan Program, which brings small businesses before a pool of 26 lenders; a Minority Business Accelerator to help firms scale and connect with prime contractors; and an Opportunity Exchange for business owners to share experiences and lessons learned. They said the Access Loan Program has funded nearly $26 million in loans with an average loan size of about $62,000. Members asked about bias in lending and how to make contracting and certification easier for minority firms. Forester said applications are vetted by a subcommittee before reaching the full lender group, with attention to completeness and readiness, and that only one lender needs to say yes. On contracting, the witnesses said certification can be burdensome and suggested more hands-on help from the state, relationship-building events that include decision-makers, and incentives rather than mandates. They also relayed policy ideas from a business owner, including culturally informed underwriting, public-private matching grants, supplier diversity enforcement, and mentorship tied to capital access. No votes or formal committee actions were taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So there's a revenue and an expenditure that are equal to the state. So it's essentially a wash.
• <01:38:59.520> So<01:38:59.600> it's that are equal to the state.
• So it's that are equal to the state.
• So, it's a consumer price thing, and it equalizes the playing field.
• I So, I it equalizes the playing field.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• the ongoing cost of this bill<00:59:21.440> is<00:59:21.599> roughly<00:59:21.920> equal
• <00:59:22.200> to<00:59:22.359> the<00:59:22.480> ongoing bill is roughly equal
• to the ongoing bill is roughly equal to the ongoing cost<00:59:23.400> of<00:59:24.119> data
• , a Title IV-E waiver program, but it didn't equalize it for children exiting permanency to guardianship
• , a Title IV-E waiver program, but it didn't equalize it for children exiting permanency to guardianship

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You're talking about cap rates, vacancy rates, the equalization ratios for towns and cities, which are
• c> ratios<00:48:50.160> for<00:48:50.400> towns<00:48:51.240> and the equalization
• ratios for towns and the equalization ratios for towns and cities<00:48:51.760> which<00:48:51.880
• This legislation will treat all buyers, those of condominiums and ROCs, equally and fairly.
• <02:17:57.519> and of Condominiums and rocks equally and of Condominiums and rocks equally

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm merely stating that it wouldn't be equal processing the claims.
• ><00:31:21.799> processing<00:31:22.279> the<00:31:22.399> claims wouldn't be equal
• processing the claims wouldn't be equal processing the claims the<00:31:22.919> point<00:31:23.120
• our citizens and uphold our commitment our citizens and uphold our commitment to<01:46:35.639> equal
• treatment under the law I to equal treatment under the law I respectfully<01:46:37.960> ask<01

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint Senate hearing focused primarily on SB 1201, a wildfire measure that would create a wildfire recovery fund and allow securitization for electric utilities. Hawaiian Electric strongly supported the bill, saying it would help protect customers, property owners, insurers, and the broader economy from future catastrophic wildfire liability while improving the utility’s credit profile and lowering financing costs. Support also came from DCCA Consumer Advocacy, the Attorney General’s office on written comments, Ulupono Initiative, Clearway Energy Group, IBEW Local 1260, Par Hawaii, KIUC, the Chamber of Commerce Hawaiʻi, Plus Power, and numerous organizations and individuals. Opponents or commenters raised concerns about the liability cap, victim compensation process, and fund structure, including the Hawaiʻi Association for Justice, the Hawaiʻi Regional Council of Carpenters, and the Hawaiʻi Insurance Council; Henry Curtis of Life of the Land supported the concept of a fund but questioned the catastrophe threshold and whether the fund would be empty without a prudency finding. Much of the discussion centered on whether the proposed fund would actually help restore Hawaiian Electric to investment grade, with senators comparing the proposal to California’s wildfire fund. Hawaiian Electric said the bill was only one part of a broader process, alongside physical risk reduction and settlement finalization, and argued that without the bill the utility would not regain investment grade. Senators also questioned the proposed $1 billion fund size, the fairness of ratepayer contributions versus shareholder contributions, and whether customers should pay for consulting and administrative costs; Hawaiian Electric said its proposed amendment would remove those consulting-related charges. The company also said the fund would accrue interest and, if unused, could be returned to customers, and that there would be replenishment and supplemental contribution mechanisms if the fund were exhausted. The Attorney General’s office said it still had further amendments to discuss, and the departments had not yet resolved where the fund should reside administratively, though Hawaiian Electric said it believed DCCA was the appropriate place but was open to alternatives. KIUC requested two amendments. No vote or final committee action was taken during the hearing, and the measure remained under discussion with questions and proposed amendments still outstanding.

Transcript Highlights:

• argument or presentation on each other, and secondly, we'd like to make sure that everyone has the same equal
• 00:01:29.640> same make sure that everyone has the same make sure that everyone has the same equal
• 00:01:31.240> no<00:01:31.360> one<00:01:31.560> can<00:01:31.720> say equal
• amount of time so no one can say equal amount of time so no one can say that<00:01:32.600> I<
• <01:13:12.120> and because all 87 counties are equal and because all 87 counties are equal

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on SF 818, a request for funding for the Block Builders Foundation, which provides financial literacy and job-readiness training for youth. Senator Fate and testifiers described a 12-week program covering budgeting, savings, banking, credit, debt, career exploration, job preparation, entrepreneurship, and mentorship. They said the program served youth ages 13 to 19, had expanded to multiple cohorts, and had produced graduation ceremonies and job placements. Testifiers also said the organization had transportation challenges and limited space, and that additional funding would help with staffing, participant support, and transportation partnerships. Committee members asked extensive questions about the program’s outcomes, funding sources, and finances. Block Builders said it had 40 graduates in the most recent cohort, with 30 placed in jobs, and that participants who complete the program receive a $500 stipend. The organization said it had been operating since 2023 in North and South Minneapolis, had received $50,000 from the state previously, and raised additional community support. Members also asked about IRS filing status, audits, and how outcomes were measured; the organization said outcomes were tracked through graduation and certificates, and that it had not yet filed a 990 because it had not reached the threshold. The bill was laid over for possible inclusion, with committee members noting the current language makes the appropriation available only through June 30, 2026 unless amended. The committee then began hearing SF 927. An A1 technical amendment was adopted without objection. Senator Pappas introduced the bill, which would appropriate $1.5 million to the Mung American Partnership for workforce development and business lending. The transcript cuts off before further testimony or committee action on SF 927.