Video & Transcript Research : 'Government Code Section 411.185'

Page 117 of 500
NE

Nebraska 2025-2026 Regular Session

Legislative Morning Session Apr 10th, 2026

Nebraska Unicameral Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Goat for North Carolina, government, Section 23-4-4-401, 23-10, 23-10, 27-0-8, and 83-10-12-20-20-20-
  • Section 7-7-1, revised section 7-5-7-0-3 to 58-703, section 7-0-1-6 to 58-7016, section 0-20701 6 and
  • and statutory sections. ...and numerous statutory sections and code references follow.
  • The reading continues with more code sections and amendment language, but the transcript is too garbled
  • of the section of the section of the section of the section of the section of the employee plans again
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • us here, please join me in welcoming Senator Aubrey McCarthy to the great House of the People of government
  • You know, it's not right for government to tax unrealized gains from... ...them having fun with their
  • Representative, on page two, section 1D, it's talking about in your description DEQ is...
  • House Bill 3435, page one, section 1, lines 24, amendment submitted by Wilkes.
  • It must be held by a bank or trust company in compliance with Section 102 of Title IX of Oklahoma statutes
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • You give good gifts to us, and government is a good gift to promote a peaceful life.
  • Government shall be the arbiter of gender. No, I think biology is the arbiter of gender.
  • But when it comes to an official government document, we are making government makes a call, aren't we
  • So would you agree that it's the role of government to determine this aspect of a person's identity?
  • It is in Section 1-321A and B on page two. You have a follow-up. Thank you.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee Apr 6th, 2026 at 10:30 am

A&B Natural Resources Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman, I moved to amend Senate Bill subPCS one for SB1319 on page two, section 1, lines 22, by deleting
  • the word 'shall' and inserting in lieu thereof the word 'may' and on page two, section 1, lines 23,
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • The government cannot punish people more harshly because they express views critical of the government
  • And it goes whether they're protesting the federal government or the state government." "Okay.
  • "And what section is that?"
  • Government exists, in my opinion, to protect public safety.
  • Section 19-102, reading with sections D and E together, Arizona has a unique position with the citizen
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2825, which would replace criminal enforcement tools for nonpayment of fines, fees, restitution, and related obligations with a civil collection process. Supporters, including the sponsor, argued it would streamline restitution collection and reduce costly incarceration, while opponents from victims’ rights groups, judges, and prosecutors said it would weaken victims’ constitutional rights and remove effective enforcement leverage. The chair adopted an amendment requiring a summons and clarifying that victims’ constitutional remedies are preserved, and the committee passed the bill 5-2. The committee then considered HB 4070, which would bar corporations from incorporating if an officer, director, or trustee had been convicted of sex or human trafficking, and would extend civil liability to those who facilitate trafficking. Supporters framed it as a “corporate death penalty” aimed at preventing trafficking through corporate governance, while the ACLU warned the facilitation language was vague and could sweep too broadly. After adopting the chair’s amendment defining “facilitate,” the committee passed the bill 5-2. The committee also unanimously recommended confirmation of Neil McDowell to the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency after hearing his background in corrections and his plans to review cases thoroughly and efficiently. Next, HB 2720 was heard, which would raise penalties for paying or agreeing to pay for sexual conduct, add a $200 assessment for the anti-human trafficking fund, and allow certain sex-trafficking victims convicted of prostitution to seal vacated records. Supporters, including law enforcement, prosecutors, and survivor advocates, said it would deter demand and help victims; opponents argued it could still sweep in trafficking victims and lacked sufficient safeguards. The committee passed the bill 4-3. The committee also heard HB 2028, a strike-everything amendment allowing community restitution in lieu of a $20 assessment for indigent homeless defendants, and HB 2047, which would increase trespass penalties for remaining in or returning to property after an eviction writ; both were discussed but no final vote is reflected in the transcript excerpt. Additional bills were introduced and heard later in the meeting, including HB 2136, which would create new offenses for “civil terrorism” and “subversion” and increase penalties for certain highway obstruction; the ACLU opposed it as viewpoint discrimination. HB 2406 would make images and recordings of abused children and deceased minors confidential and restrict dissemination and monetization; the sponsor said it was intended to prevent re-victimization and misuse of public records, while defense-side speakers asked for clearer access for defense teams. HB 2415 would tighten regulation of kratom products and specifically target concentrated 7-OH products; testimony sharply split between supporters who described public-health risks and opponents who said prohibition would harm consumers who use it for pain or recovery. The transcript ends before any final action on those later bills is shown.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/16/2026 - House Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • were discussing solutions on the council, one question kept coming to mind for me: even if local governments
  • implement WUI codes, which could benefit individuals who live in homes that are built under the code
  • implement WUI codes, which could benefit individuals who live in homes that are built under the code
  • You've got a delisting and defunding from the federal government, and what we're doing is encouraging
  • the ranchers, and they have been losing a lot of profit over that because... ...from the federal government
Summary: The committee heard three measures. HB 2013 would require the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to submit an exceptional event demonstration to the EPA when wildfires on federally managed land affect Arizona air quality. Sponsor Rep. Lisa Fink said the bill is intended to prevent Arizona from being penalized for wildfire-driven air quality problems and could help reduce regulatory burdens. Sierra Club opposed the bill, arguing the existing exceptional-event process already requires case-by-case analysis, that automatic filings could be unnecessary or ineffective, and that the bill lacked an appropriation. ADEQ testified neutral. The committee approved HB 2013 on a 5-1 vote. HB 2292 would create the Wildfire Prevention Authority and Fund under the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management; a committee amendment renamed it the Wildfire Mitigation and Risk Reduction Authority and Fund, capped administrative expenses at 8%, and prioritized funding for single-family and multi-family dwellings. Supporters, including Coconino County Vice Chair Geronimo Vasquez and the County Supervisors Association, said the bill would provide a coordinated, data-driven wildfire mitigation program funded by a $20 million annual diversion from insurance premium tax revenues, helping reduce wildfire damage and stabilize insurance costs. Members discussed the funding source as an existing tax diversion rather than a new tax. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed HB 2292 as amended on an 8-0 vote. HCM 2011 urges Congress to pass federal legislation to delist the Mexican wolf, defund the reintroduction program, and transfer management to local authorities. The sponsor said the memorial responds to ranching impacts from wolf predation and supports federal action already moving in Congress. Sierra Club opposed the memorial, saying the species remains insufficiently recovered and that delisting would be premature. After debate, including comments both supporting and opposing delisting, the committee approved HCM 2011 on a 5-2 vote and then adjourned.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation Education Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Finance and Taxation Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's just striking a section out of there. All right. Senator Singleton moves the amendment.
  • She's giving it to me now. what conduct is described in section 30?
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, in some ways, we already subsidize that with some of our sales tax exemptions and our tax code,
  • um you know I board in state government um you know I I<00:31:11.840> think<00:31:12.080>
  • um but also exemptions and our tax code um but also this<00:32:18.960> this<00:32:19.080>
  • <00:52:03.839> 35 all notices recorded under Section 35 all notices recorded under Section
  • <00:57:20.400> of requirements in that section of requirements in that section of subdivision
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Mar 5th, 2025

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • Alabama Code Section 17-162 outlines how our state conducts recounts.
  • I've been in county government for like 30 or 40 years, and when you get your ballot, they count that
  • My name is Jane Adams, and I serve as the Government Relations Director for the American Cancer Society
  • , and other stakeholders. ...from local governments and other parties.
  • Section 2811, that's the T21 law in Alabama, applies to all tobacco products.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Piper of the House and Rader of the Senate, an act relating to the Oklahoma Environmental Quality Code
  • Piper of the House and Rader of the Senate, an act relating to the Oklahoma Environmental Quality Code
Summary: The House convened, called the roll, and heard an invocation focused on “leading with the farewell,” followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and a series of floor recognitions honoring guests and student groups. Presentations included the nurse of the day, Susan Hollingsworth, and multiple student champions and visitors, including the Clinton High School 4A hip hop state champions, Pryor High School’s Life Smarts state champions, the Elgin High School wrestling team, the Fort Gibson FFA livestock judging team, Putnam City North’s girls basketball champions, visiting students from Douglas, OSU environmental science graduate students, and Oklahoma Energy Resource Board teachers of the year. The chamber then took up several Senate bills. SB 378, updating bail bondsman regulations, passed 77-3. SB 985, codifying the local food for school program in statute, passed 79-0. SB 1246, which would update and speed up DEQ permitting while preserving transparency, drew questions about agency outreach and environmental impacts; after a division vote on advancing the bill passed 30-28, the bill itself passed 81-0. Later, SB 1500 on pharmacy benefit managers passed 81-0, SB 1984 on osteopathic medicine passed 74-0, and SB 1644 creating a reporting mechanism for suspected alpha-gal syndrome passed 82-0. The House also adopted Senate amendments to HB 3720, the local food freedom bill, and passed it 81-0. HB 4118, the family caregiver credit, also passed 81-0 after the Senate amendment restored the title “Caring for Caregivers Act.” A motion was made to reject Senate amendments to HB 2992 and request conference. House Joint Resolution 1100, relating to OMES proposed major rule changes, was read on second reading and referred to administrative rules. A lengthy debate centered on an amendment to SB 1546, a teacher-related bill, which would expand the Oklahoma Equal Opportunity Scholarship Fund tax credit to support the Strong Readers Act, the Oklahoma Math Proficiency Act, and certain capital projects for scholarship-granting organizations. Supporters said it would encourage private investment in education and add instructional capacity; opponents argued it would favor wealthy private schools, do little for rural or high-poverty districts, and divert scholarship resources. The amendment was adopted unanimously, and the bill was advanced to final passage, with debate continuing at the end of the transcript.