Transcript Highlights:

• Call the witness and get you back up to close. Our chair calls Scott Ellers.
• Chair calls Shannon Epner. Ms.
• The Chair calls Kyle Dobbs. Mr.
• Clerk, please call the, call the room.
• about the process.

Transcript Highlights:

• determination process.
• Because I'm sorry. we call the preliminary determination process.
• We'd start gathering data sometimes, because we would have to start a process, a rulemaking process,
• Madam Secretary, please call the roll. Madam Secretary, will you please call the roll?
• This is part of the process.

Keywords: 965, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 408 by Senator Myers, a workers’ compensation overhaul creating an all-claims medical database, requiring electronic reporting and billing, and setting up confidentiality, rulemaking, and penalties. Senator Myers said the bill was meant to modernize a paper-based system, speed injured workers back to care and work, reduce disputes through a more predictable fee schedule, address outliers and abuse, and generate reliable data for future fee-schedule decisions. Representative Melarine then offered a large amendment package combining portions of House Bills 780 and 1101 into SB 408, adding preliminary-determination procedures, changes to benefit durations, fraud language, and a deadline for the department to establish a fee schedule if no agreement is reached. Supporters said the package would create a more complete reform; opponents argued the additions were rushed, not germane, and would harm injured workers, especially those without lawyers, by adding technical filing burdens and stricter fraud consequences. After debate, the committee adopted the amendment package, then adopted a follow-up amendment removing the word “potential” from a fines provision and deleting the fraud section, and finally reported SB 408 with amendments on a divided vote. Testimony on SB 408 was sharply split. Proponents, including Alton Ashy and Trey Mustian, argued the bill’s transparency and data-collection provisions were the most important part, that the system needs a modern fee schedule, and that the added reforms would help control costs and speed payment. Opponents, including Shannon Lindsay and another injured-worker advocate, said the original bill was a good compromise but the added provisions changed its character and would disadvantage pro se claimants, remove materiality from fraud law, and reduce benefits for seriously injured workers. Committee members also questioned the timeline for the database and fee schedule, the effect of historical data gaps, and whether the reforms would help employers and injured workers alike. The committee ultimately agreed the bill still contained its core goals of faster care, predictable fees, anti-abuse measures, and modernization. The committee then moved to House Bill 585 by Representative Chasson, a workplace-violence/safety measure for small-box discount retailers. Chasson explained that the bill had been narrowed to require retailers to submit an existing written workforce safety plan, or develop one if they do not already have one, with no penalties attached. The committee adopted a substitute bill incorporating prior amendments. Representative Glorioso noted continuing concerns about civil-liability implications and the duty to protect against third-party criminal acts, but the bill was advanced from committee after the substitute was adopted.

Transcript Highlights:

• WE PARTNER WITH IT TECHNOLOGY FIRM CALLED AMBIENCE.
• IT ALSO PROVIDES FEEDBACK WHAT IS CALLED COACHING ON THE SESSION.
• IT WOUND UP ANSWERING AROUND 90,000 CALLS OVER A 2 TO 3 WEEK SPAN.
• AS AN ORGANIZATION IN A RIGOROUS PROCESS FOR ADOPTING TECHNOLOGY.
• AND IF THEY ARE NOT, AND COULD THEY USE AI TO PROCESS APPROVALS QUICKLY.

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Secretary, please call the roll.
• Zbur, aye. 7-3, so that bill's on call, and we'll leave the roll open. 7-3, so that bill's on call, and
• It's simply a phone call.
• One of the core parts of that is to improve our planning processes. ...improve our planning processes
• considered in the planning process and interconnection process is so that they could be timely considered

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Utilities and Energy heard SB 1259, which would require refineries to provide advance closure and remediation planning information, and SB 1425, which would authorize the High-Speed Rail Authority to create a permit process for encroachments in its right of way. The committee also held an informational hearing on California electricity reliability and the future of the Strategic Reliability Reserve. The chair opened by noting the hearing room change, testimony limits, and that the committee would proceed without a quorum at first, then later established quorum for votes. On SB 1259, Senator Blake Spear argued the bill would give communities and state agencies needed information to plan for refinery closures, cleanup, and land reuse, comparing the requirement to estate planning. Supporters, including Benicia City Councilmember Carrie Birdseye and UC Santa Barbara professor Ranjit Schmook, said the bill would help communities facing refinery closures avoid being left without information and better prepare for redevelopment and remediation. Opponents, including the Western States Petroleum Association, the State Building and Construction Trades Council, and business groups, argued the bill could send negative market signals, create conflicts with federal reporting, and potentially accelerate refinery closures. The committee passed SB 1259 on a 7-3 vote, later reopening the roll and recording additional votes before moving it out as amended to Appropriations. On SB 1425, Senator Cortese and sponsor Robert Pearsall said the bill would help the High-Speed Rail Authority manage utility, broadband, drainage, and vegetation encroachments along the project corridor and reduce delays. Labor and construction groups supported the measure as a way to add certainty and speed project delivery. Utilities and local agencies, including LADWP, Southern California Gas, Southern California Edison, PG&E, and others, opposed unless amended, saying the bill needed clearer language on emergencies, existing agreements, and potential impacts on their own rights of way and service obligations. After discussion about emergency language and utility coordination, the committee passed SB 1425 as amended to Appropriations on a 10-3 vote. In the oversight hearing, CEC, CPUC, CAISO, and DWR officials reported that California’s summer reliability outlook is better than in prior years, with substantial new procurement, storage, and demand-response resources added since 2020. They said the state is projected to meet its summer reliability standard and has not needed a flex alert for three straight years, but cautioned that extreme heat, fire, hydro conditions, and federal policy uncertainty still pose risks. Officials emphasized that the current Strategic Reliability Reserve remains important as a backstop, while longer-term planning must address rising demand from electrification and data centers and the eventual retirement of emergency resources.

Transcript Highlights:

• He said he was going to call attention. Attention. He said he was going to call me up.
• CL, call up the next resolution.
• CL, call the next bill.
• Well, it's a lot in the process, but I enjoy the process. It's just a balance to try to make...
• So, it's going to make that process simplified, both the process of distributing a small estate and the

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But House Bill 803 does more than streamline processes.
• Amy, please call the roll. Vice Chair Porras? Yes. Committee Whip Tremont?
• The heat pump went out, I called my pool guy and he said, "Oh, you gotta call the AC guys.
• To be a part of the comprehensive plan amendment process.
• We have a process for these things, and this attempts to really truncate that process and expedite these

Transcript Highlights:

• I call the Human Services, Finance, and Policy Committee to order.
• <00:04:55.199> We and walked over the whole process.
• We and walked over the whole process.
• All right, so I will recess to the call of the chair.
• We are in recess. will recess to the call chairs. We are will recess to the call chairs.

Bills: HF2434

Keywords: healthcare, personal care assistance, worker retention, disability services, state funding, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Do we have to do a roll call? Okay, roll call. Okay, so Chairman Burkhard. Senators, Barta. Aye.
• We call them Part 108 and Part 146.
• We call them part 108 and part 146.
• and plan review process has been.
• and plan review process has been.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do we have to do a roll call? Okay, roll call. Chairman Burckhard, Senators, Barta. Aye. Gerhardt?
• Do we have to do a roll call? Okay, roll call. Okay, so Chairman Burkhard. Senators, Barta. Aye.
• We call them Part 108 and Part 146.
• be a process to.
• and plan review process has been.

Summary: The committee first received a general fund and revenue update from the Office of Management and Budget. Staff reported that the state started the biennium about $176 million above prior estimates, but year-to-date revenues were now running below legislative forecast, mainly due to lower individual income tax and sales tax collections. The budget stabilization fund was above its cap, the legacy fund continued to grow, and oil revenues were slightly above forecast overall. Members also asked about federal funding uncertainty and mineral leasing variability, and OMB said agencies would be asked to address potential federal reductions case by case during budget preparation. The committee then reviewed compliance reports and trust fund analysis materials, followed by a bill draft for a fixed-route city transportation grant program. Testimony from transit officials in Fargo and Minot supported the proposal, saying state aid would help match federal transit funds and support operations, but members raised questions about the funding source, fare structures, and whether the program should be limited to the current four fixed-route cities or allow future eligible cities. Several members asked for more time to study the formula and possible funding options before moving the bill forward. Next, the committee approved a bill draft repealing obsolete language related to a proposed North Dakota-South Dakota bi-state authority. Staff explained the provision had been unused for about 30 years and that existing law likely already allowed joint powers agreements without the specific language. The committee voted to adopt the repeal bill draft. The Department of Commerce and the Northern Plains UAS Test Site then provided an update on uncrewed aircraft system initiatives, including the Vantis radar data enclave, the drone replacement program, and future revenue models. Officials said North Dakota had received FAA approval to operate the radar data pathfinder, had begun replacing non-compliant drones from restricted foreign sources, and was working on phased procurement and cost-recovery plans. Members asked about deadlines, funding, supply-chain issues, and how the system would be used; staff said the federal restrictions were already in effect and that Vantis was being positioned as infrastructure for future beyond-visual-line-of-sight operations. Finally, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation presented on the design of a new minimum-security prison and on a reentry housing task force. The new facility is planned for the penitentiary grounds, with a reduced estimated cost of about $263 million, 600 beds initially, possible expansion to 732 beds, and completion projected around 2031 if funded in 2027. The reentry housing task force described a data-driven effort to identify housing needs for people leaving incarceration, with the goal of reducing homelessness and recidivism through targeted housing support and possible subsidies. Members asked about staffing, site selection, housing duration, and whether employment and transportation needs would be included in the assessment.

Transcript Highlights:

• to help do that with that turnover in the legislative process.
• Because, you know, we know the process. We know the difficulty.
• Because, you know, we know the process.
• So it's not an idea that would be foreign to this process.
• So it's not an idea that would be foreign to this process.

Summary: The Legislative Procedure and Arrangements Committee met with a quorum, approved the prior minutes, and then took up a draft bill to make legislators’ and candidates’ residential addresses confidential in public records. Legislative Council and the Secretary of State explained the proposal was prompted by security concerns and would protect residential addresses while still allowing election officials to verify residency and keep candidate names and offices public. Members raised concerns about unintended consequences, transparency, and how the change would affect rural districts and residency enforcement. The Secretary of State suggested an amendment to end the confidentiality when a candidate’s term ends, and the committee agreed to hold the bill over for further discussion at the next meeting. The committee also reviewed follow-up materials on legislator security and best practices, including advice on situational awareness, internet hygiene, varying routines, and reporting threats, along with NCSL materials comparing capitol security practices in other states. Members discussed a recent security incident and the need to keep alert contact information current, and staff said they would continue working with the Highway Patrol on legislative-specific notifications. The bulk of the meeting was devoted to Garrity Consulting’s final report on mitigating the effects of legislative term limits. The consultants summarized survey, focus group, and stakeholder input showing concerns about loss of institutional knowledge, leadership turnover, onboarding demands, and workload pressures, while also noting public support for term limits and annual sessions. Recommendations included considering annual sessions or shifting biennial sessions to even-numbered years, restructuring organizational session and interim committee work, creating office hours and more structured orientation and mentorship, expanding ongoing training and staff support, improving public communication and virtual testimony rules, and addressing barriers to service such as employer support and travel costs. Members discussed the tension between making the legislature more effective and preserving a citizen-legislature model, and the report was received as a roadmap for future implementation rather than immediate action.

Transcript Highlights:

• here knows that I'm a process person. here knows that I'm a process person.
• Madam Speaker, I request a roll call. Roll call being requested. There will be a roll call.
• by the process, not only the process by the process, not only the process that<00:17:42.640>
• Oh, we got to go through the process. Oh, we got to go through the process.
• > discussing The process actually includes discussing The process actually includes discussing

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Secretary will call the roll.
• We'll call the roll.
• The secretary will call the roll. I now call the roll.
• I call the roll.
• Secretary will call the roll.

Keywords: legislation, Senate Joint Resolution 40, Senate Bill 871, constitutional amendment, emergency powers, governor authority, legislative oversight

Summary: The meeting focused on several crucial pieces of legislation, notably Senate Joint Resolution 40, which proposed a constitutional amendment to clarify the powers of the governor, the legislature, and the Supreme Court during emergencies. Senator Birdwell presented the resolution, emphasizing the need for legislative involvement during prolonged crises. It garnered broad support, passing with 29 votes in favor and only 1 against. Following this, Senate Bill 871, considered the enabling legislation, was also moved for discussion, with the aim of reinforcing the legislature's authority during emergencies while establishing clear guidelines for the governor's powers.

Transcript Highlights:

• It includes clarifying language to the recall process.
• Elizabeth, please call the roll on SB 936.
• So it would—the current process would still apply.
• Elizabeth, please call the roll on SB 1020. Elizabeth, please call the roll on SB 1020.
• orders and administrative approval processes.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and considered a series of bills, many focused on local government authority, land use, housing, and public notice requirements. Several measures were reported favorably, including SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits and prevention, SB 1612 requiring local governments to accept electronic payments, SB 936 on temporary door locking devices, SB 962 on affordable housing protections for farms, SB 218 on land use regulations in hurricane-affected counties, SB 1020 on regulation of chickee huts, and SB 1434 on infill redevelopment of environmentally challenged properties. SB 1180 on community development district recall elections was amended to narrow and clarify the recall process and to add provisions on synthetic turf and compact urban mixed-use districts before being reported favorably. SB 380 on legal notices was also amended and reported favorably despite significant opposition from the Florida Press Association, Common Cause, and others who argued it would further fragment public notice access; supporters said it would modernize publication options and save money. Testimony on the bills was mixed. Supporters of the housing and redevelopment measures argued they would increase attainable housing, streamline approvals, and make better use of underutilized or contaminated land, while local government groups and advocacy organizations warned about overdevelopment, reduced public input, infrastructure strain, and conflicts with comprehensive planning. On SB 1444, which combined preemptions related to religious gatherings, private clubs, and certain permitting requirements, supporters framed it as protecting religious freedom and limiting local micromanagement, while the League of Cities and the Florida Association of Counties opposed it as overly broad and unclear; the bill nevertheless passed favorably after debate. SB 218 was presented as restoring normal land-use authority in counties unaffected by hurricanes while preserving protections in damaged areas, and SB 984 was described as clarifying firefighter cancer benefits and health coverage rules; both passed without controversy. The committee also heard extensive testimony on SB 948, a strike-all on local government land development regulations and orders that would create a statewide framework for starter homes and lot-split rules within urban growth areas. Supporters said it would expand housing supply and reduce regulatory delays, while opponents said it would override local zoning, weaken infrastructure and environmental protections, and apply too broadly. The bill drew support from housing advocates and some local officials, but opposition from the Florida League of Cities, Florida Association of Counties, and others. The transcript ends with SB 948 still under consideration, with testimony continuing and no final vote shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• You referred to the process that the SIC uses.
• Is there room for that in your process?
• Is there is there room for that in your process?
• I also don't think we can ask, say, you should stop your process until we do our process.
• If under due process... ...in order to meet that, if under due process and appropriate regulations, I

Bills: SM20, SM9, SJR6, HB124

Keywords: youth violence, violence prevention, violence intervention, community violence intervention, credible messengers, peer support, restorative justice, violence interrupters, juvenile justice, at-risk youth, high-risk youth, public safety, Department of Health, New Mexico, statewide summit, data collection, reporting, interagency coordination, community-based organizations, law enforcement

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, I would ask for a roll call.
• Chair, I would ask for a roll call. I would ask for a roll call. Roll call requested.
• I would like to ask a roll call on that amendment. Roll call requested. Roll call granted.
• roll call Amendment roll call requested roll call granted<00:36:16.359> we're<00:36:16.599>
• SF 569 calls for...

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Elections Committee met on February 6, 2025, and first considered the reappointment of Steven Swanson to the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board. Swanson described his background in legal aid, lobbying, judging, and international rule-of-law work, and said he wanted to continue serving the public. Committee members praised his experience and discussed the importance of campaign finance oversight, including preventing corporate participation in Minnesota elections. Senator Wosinski moved to recommend Swanson’s confirmation, and the motion was adopted. The committee then heard Senate File 529, a proposed constitutional amendment to state that elections shall be free, fair, and equal, and that no civil or military power may interfere with the free exercise of the right to vote. Senator Dibble presented the bill as a way to strengthen voting rights and provide a constitutional basis to challenge voter suppression, gerrymandering, and unfair campaign practices. Testimony in support came from David Fischer of Clean Elections Minnesota and Jean Massie of Fair Vote Minnesota, both of whom argued the amendment would protect access to voting, increase confidence in elections, and align Minnesota with other states that have similar language. Members discussed whether the amendment’s broad language could invite judicial interpretation or affect future election laws. Senator Koran questioned how the proposal would improve Minnesota’s already high turnout, while Senator Grant raised concerns that the terms “free, fair, and equal” were undefined and could shift power to the courts. Senator Lucero proposed an oral amendment to add “ensuring one eligible citizen, one vote” after the word “equal,” saying it would address concerns about future voter ID laws. The amendment was restated by counsel and discussed, with Senator Dibble saying it did not significantly harm the bill but suggesting it might imply a requirement he did not intend. The transcript ends during discussion of that oral amendment, and no final vote on the bill itself is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:20:45.400> So, the discovery process. So, the discovery process.
• discovery process should protect them. discovery process should protect them.
• They reduce call processing times, cut human error, and increase shared situational awareness in several
• They reduce call processing<01:47:35.640> times,<01:47:36.200> cut<01:47:36.520> human
• telephone call telephone call uh<02:19:11.040> services.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Here, you can call your state climatologist.
• So that's more or less the process that is followed.
• We called it a cocktail of funding a couple of years ago, but now we're calling it stacking—how did we
• We have a thinning process.
• So the process is broken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Roll call requested, roll call granted.
• Roll call requested, roll call granted.
• Roll call requested, roll call granted.
• Roll call requested, roll call granted.
• Roll call requested, roll call granted.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:11:45.040> special that selectman uh can call special that selectman uh can call special
• Can call special meetings. morning. Can call special meetings.
• Hearing none the clerk will call 103.
• would be called and conducted election would be called and conducted for<00:30:49.520> the<00
• on<01:11:04.480> amendment call the role on amendment call the role on amendment 2025-2406H

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chief Clerk, please call the roll.
• Roll call. Let's finish our roll call. >> Warf. >> Mr.
• Division being called. Did I hear division? Division being called.
• Question being called on the motion. Question being called on the motion.
• So, Chief Clerk, call the roll. Chief Clerk, call the roll.

Keywords: 916, all