Video & Transcript Research : 'Section 42'
Page 116 of 500
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 4/2/25
Human Services Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:42:13.720>
I <00:42:13.800>see <00:42:14.079>value <00:42:14.359>in <00:42:17.599>- but
the <00:42:17.760>thing <00:42:17.960>that <00:42:18.200>- :42:25.440>
from <00:42:25.720>across <00:42:26.119>the <00:42:26.280>state - civil<00:42:27.839>
committing <00:42:28.520>600 <00:42:29.520>a <00:42:29.800>- :42:31.839>
year <00:42:32.079>after <00:42:32.440>that <00:42:33.160>what
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Committee on State and Local Government - 03/13/25
State and Local Government
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:42:03.000>
uh <00:42:03.200>seeing <00:42:03.599>no <00:42:04.520>no< - testifiers<00:42:05.960>
uh <00:42:06.240>any oh<00:42:14.760>no <00:42:15.599>< - state your<00:42:23.800>
name <00:42:24.000>for <00:42:24.200>the <00:42:24.319> - >
you <00:42:26.200>chair <00:42:26.640>and <00:42:26.880>M <00:42:27.160> - /c><00:42:34.640>
is <00:42:34.720>Sean <00:42:35.040>Tetro <00:42:35.880>and
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Municipal and County Government (02/10/2025)
Municipal and County Government
Transcript Highlights:
- our bnbs<01:42:03.920>
it's <01:42:04.040>not <01:42:04.199>going <01:42:04.280> - <01:42:17.679>
I <01:42:17.760>would <01:42:17.920>be <01:42:18.040>happy - take<01:42:18.800>
any <01:42:19.400>U <01:42:20.199>questions <01:42:20.920> - c> sure<01:42:22.560>
I <01:42:22.679>get <01:42:22.840>stuck <01:42:23.360>< - 01:42:39.400>
can't <01:42:39.599>you <01:42:39.760>as <01:42:39.880>a <01
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Executive Departments and Administration (01/23/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- >
you <04:42:10.840>might <04:42:11.360>talking <04:42:11.638>about <04:42 - <04:42:39.798>
so <04:42:40.320>that's <04:42:40.480>not <04:42:40.638>what - asking<04:42:41.240>
came <04:42:41.400>for <04:42:41.878>follow <04:42:42.200><- >
is <04:42:45.840>was <04:42:46.000>one <04:42:46.160>of <04:42:46.320>- ><04:42:50.760>
is <04:42:50.840>not <04:42:51.000>lasic <04:42:51.520>okay - asking<04:42:41.240>
Summary:
The committee held public hearings on House Bill 144 and House Bill 145, both related to professional licensing for dietitians and dental hygienists. HB 144 was described as a technical fix to align statute with existing Board of Dental Examiners rules allowing dental hygienists to administer nitrous oxide and local anesthesia, with supporters saying the bill would add needed training and examination requirements to statute. A dentist and dental society representative testified that the practice is already being done safely within scope, and committee members discussed whether nitrous oxide is still used and whether the bill was mainly to keep the paperwork and law consistent. The committee moved HB 144 forward on a 12-0 vote and placed it on consent.
HB 145 would join New Hampshire to a dietitian licensure compact and add a criminal history check for initial licensure to match compact language. The sponsor and board witnesses said the compact would improve portability, support telehealth, help military families and spouses, and maintain public safety by ensuring qualified practitioners and information-sharing among member states. Committee members asked about withdrawal from the compact, the difference between single-state and compact licensure, and why a background check was included; the witness said the compact is not yet active, with four states enacted and seven needed, and that the background check is required by the compact language. Additional testimony from a private-practice dietitian supported the bill, citing continuity of care, rural access, and workforce mobility, while some members raised concerns about telehealth across state lines and the practical effect of the background check.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Seclusion Working Group - 01/14/26
Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, so<00:42:10.560>
that <00:42:10.880>I, <00:42:11.440>you <00:42:11.520>know - ,<00:42:11.599>
I <00:42:11.760>would <00:42:11.920>look <00:42:12.000>to - to the department<00:42:12.480>
for <00:42:12.640>that, <00:42:12.800>but <00:42 - c><00:42:38.240>
making <00:42:38.480>sure <00:42:38.560>that <00:42:38.720>we - <00:42:42.000>
So <00:42:42.160>I <00:42:42.319>appreciate <00:42:42.720>
Summary:
The Seclusion Working Group approved the prior meeting minutes and then spent most of the meeting discussing draft recommendations and a Senate amendment, 007-7, related to seclusion in schools. The chair explained the history of the issue, including Minnesota’s 2023 ban on seclusion from birth through grade 3, and described 007-7 as a compromise developed with stakeholders that would extend the ban through grade 6 unless strict conditions are met. Those conditions include explicit written informed consent from all parents or guardians in their primary language, oral translation of safeguards, showing the seclusion room before consent, mandatory follow-up IEP meetings after repeated use, outreach and education for families, and data reporting on use of seclusion. The chair also said the amendment would prevent judges or other officials from ordering seclusion over a parent’s objection.
Members then reviewed the draft recommendations line by line. They agreed to revise language to add “and fund” after “mandate” in the first section, and discussed changing references from “level three and level four” to “level three and higher,” though several members ultimately preferred keeping the focus on school settings and not expanding into medical or correctional settings. They also discussed replacing the word “subjected” with more neutral language such as “experience” or “whose IEP includes seclusion.” Another issue was whether the recommendations should distinguish between students whose IEP already includes seclusion and students who experience seclusion in an emergency but do not have it in their IEP; members suggested splitting that into separate recommendations and possibly adding a new item for the latter situation.
A final discussion focused on whether the working group should recommend a mandated alternative-to-seclusion program and whether such a mandate should be tied to funding. School district representatives said many districts already use programs such as CPI, but others, especially outstate districts, charter schools, hospitals, and residential settings, may face significant costs if required to adopt new programs like Ukeru. Members generally agreed that if the legislature is asked to require implementation of new alternatives, funding should accompany the mandate. The chair also noted that existing law already requires an IEP team meeting after restrictive procedures are used twice in 30 days, and encouraged members to compare that with the 007-7 language before finalizing recommendations.
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado Senate 2026 Legislative Day 115 May 8th, 2026
Colorado Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- 42:09.320>
conference <00:42:09.640>committee <00:42:09.960>on <00:42:10.120> - House has laid<00:42:16.000>
over <00:42:16.200>Senate <00:42:16.440>Bill <00:42: - The<00:42:19.000>
bill <00:42:19.280>is <00:42:19.400>returned <00:42:19.800> - The<00:42:20.760>
House <00:42:20.960>has <00:42:21.080>passed <00:42:21.360> - <00:42:25.400>
Journal <00:42:25.640>May <00:42:25.760>1st, <00:42:26.040>
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Environment and Agriculture (02/17/2026)
Environment and Agriculture
Transcript Highlights:
- So, I'm just not<00:42:04.400>
sure <00:42:04.640>that <00:42:05.520>it's <00:42: - <00:42:07.920>
it's <00:42:08.240>necessary <00:42:08.800>to <00:42:09.040>- , which is<00:42:11.440>
that <00:42:11.760>conflict <00:42:12.079>of <00:42:12.319- >
can't <00:42:48.319>be <00:42:48.480>you <00:42:48.720>can't <00:42:48.880- >
I'm <01:42:57.280>going <01:42:57.440>to <01:42:58.400>I <01:42:58.719>< - , which is<00:42:11.440>
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 03/05/25
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:42:18.839>
any <00:42:19.000>of <00:42:19.119>the <00:42:19.319>reason - 42:24.920>
the <00:42:25.160>office <00:42:26.040>to <00:42:26.240>a with - <00:42:35.559>
looking <00:42:35.880>at <00:42:36.119>adding <00:42:36.599>- >
be <00:42:39.440>a <00:42:39.599>total <00:42:39.920>of <00:42:40.119>- <00:42:49.599>
as <00:42:49.720>a <00:42:49.880>whole <00:42:50.559>the - >
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Judiciary (03/10/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- officer<00:42:24.160>
and <00:42:24.359>replaces <00:42:24.880>it <00:42:25.200> - :42:29.440>
heard <00:42:29.640>in <00:42:29.760>our <00:42:30.359>testimony< - > a<00:42:32.839>
range <00:42:33.280>of <00:42:33.480>state <00:42:33.839>- >
um <00:42:38.319>based <00:42:38.760>on <00:42:39.319>a <00:42:40.319>- the<01:42:22.599>
skill <01:42:22.840>sets <01:42:23.320>they <01:42:23.440>< - >
Summary:
The committee first took up House Bill 313 and, on motion by Representative Perez, voted to retain the bill because members felt it needed further work and was not ready for final action. The motion passed 18-0, and no further action was taken on the bill. House Bill 391, an anti-SLAPP measure, was then discussed; supporters said it addressed a real problem and should move forward, while opponents raised concerns that it was too broad, could affect criminal cases, and might create procedural complications. The committee voted 18-0 to retain HB 391 as well, and it was placed on consent.
The committee next considered House Bill 462, establishing a cause of action for unwarranted video imaging of residential properties. Representative McFarland moved OTP, saying the bill raised First Amendment and property-rights concerns. The motion passed 18-0, and the bill was also placed on consent. The committee then turned to House Bill 509, which would require reporting on forfeitures. Supporters argued the information was useful for future legislation, while opponents said the reporting would be costly, duplicative, and potentially split data across fiscal years. The committee voted 11-7 to recommend OTP, with a minority of members opposed.
House Bill 520, authorizing Department of Education hearing officers to issue subpoenas, drew the most extended debate. Supporters argued DOE needed the same tools other agencies have, while opponents said DOE already had access to needed information, the Attorney General could handle subpoenas, and the bill would create an unbalanced process and raise due process and student-record concerns. Representative Tur offered Amendment 0842H to shift subpoena power from DOE hearing officers to the Attorney General; after debate, the amendment failed 10-8. The transcript cuts off as the committee begins the roll call on the underlying bill after rejecting the amendment.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- >> Uh<00:42:04.240>
yeah <00:42:04.520>sure <00:42:04.760>no <00:42:04.920> I <00:42:05.160>I <00:42:05.240>appreciate <00:42:05.720>it <00:42:05.760- >
this <00:42:08.600>would <00:42:08.800>would <00:42:09.000>likely <00:42 - Um,<00:42:22.640>
you <00:42:22.720>know, <00:42:22.840>I <00:42:23.080>I've< - /c><00:42:23.680>
it's <00:42:23.880>you <00:42:23.960>know, <00:42:24.080>we
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- :02.560>
to <00:42:02.880>safety <00:42:03.280>on <00:42:03.440>the <00:42 - It is<00:42:11.680>
supported <00:42:12.079>by <00:42:12.240>the <00:42:12.480>- <00:42:15.200>
of <00:42:15.440>safety <00:42:16.319>and <00:42:16.800>I< - I urge you<00:42:17.839>
to <00:42:18.000>pay <00:42:18.800>ought <00:42:18.880><- Um, Senator,<00:42:29.520>
you <00:42:29.680>know, <00:42:29.760>I <00:42:30.079> - <00:42:15.200>
NH
Transcript Highlights:
on <01:42:07.440>a <01:42:07.679>transient <01:42:08.480>or <01:42:08.800- <01:42:24.560>
Then <01:42:24.800>another <01:42:25.199>issue <01:42:25.440>< - And when I<01:42:36.400>
did <01:42:36.560>the <01:42:36.800>research <01:42:37.360 - 42:39.119>
Bill <01:42:39.639>1281, <01:42:40.639>I <01:42:40.880>did <01: - /c><01:42:48.320>
I <01:42:48.639>was <01:42:49.000>hearing <01:42:50.000>and
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
HHS, HHS DEFER Public Hearings 02-18-2026
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:42:06.880>
last <00:42:07.200>year <00:42:07.839>and <00:42:08.079>we - the<00:42:12.400>
the <00:42:12.800>reasons <00:42:13.119>for <00:42:13.359> - <00:42:15.119>
You <00:42:15.359>can <00:42:15.520>put <00:42:15.680>it - You can put it and<00:42:16.079>
you <00:42:16.240>can <00:42:16.480>make <00:42:- c><00:42:18.960>
the <00:42:19.520>government <00:42:19.839>should <00:42:20.079> - You can put it and<00:42:16.079>
Summary:
The committee heard testimony on SB 3025, relating to medical debt, with multiple organizations and individuals, including the Office of Wellness and Resilience, Healthcare Association of Hawaii, Queens Health Systems, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Aloha Care, Hawaii Health and Harm Reduction, Hawaii Data Collaborative, and Hawaii Appleseed, all speaking in support. No opposition was heard, and the member present had no questions.
The committee then took up SB 3199, which would establish a mental health emerging therapies task force. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support, with speakers including veterans, clinicians, researchers, and advocacy groups describing personal experiences with PTSD, depression, traumatic brain injury, and treatment-resistant conditions, and arguing that Hawaii should prepare for regulated access to emerging therapies such as MDMA, psilocybin, ketamine, and ibogaine. The Department of Health and some medical organizations provided comments, and one opposition witness was called but not present. The chair noted broad support, especially from veterans, and no vote was taken during the excerpt.
The final measure discussed was SB 3324, relating to Medicaid. The Department of Human Services, Department of Health, Hawaii State Council on Developmental Disabilities, Hawaii Disability Rights Center, Aloha Care, and numerous care-provider and aging/disability organizations testified in support, while one witness was in opposition and several others offered comments. The discussion then moved to SB 2563, relating to homelessness, where the Department of the Attorney General offered comments on specific sections and recommended adopting suggested amendments if the bill proceeds. Additional testimony on SB 2563 began with support from several individuals, including Shelby Pikachu, who emphasized the severity of homelessness and related social problems in the community.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 4/10/25
Transportation Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh and then section 16 section 15.
- <00:42:04.640>
license <00:42:05.040>exams <00:42:06.000>and <00:42:06.480>this - Section 42 makes a technical clarification on the reference to establish a cross-reference to the
- this section. this section.
- Section 52 also relates to section.
Bills:
HF2438
Keywords:
transportation finance, transportation policy, MnDOT, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Department of Public Safety, Metropolitan Council, highway funding, trunk highway fund, county state-aid highway fund, municipal state-aid street fund, state aid roads, local roads, bridge funding, road construction, transit funding, passenger rail, freight rail, aviation, airport development, safe routes to school
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Ways and Means (03/04/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- 42:08.440>
other <00:42:08.640>than <00:42:08.800>New <00:42:09.000>Hampshire - transport so<00:42:13.880>
am <00:42:14.079>I <00:42:14.560>understanding <00:42 - /c><00:42:50.440>
the <00:42:50.559>other <00:42:50.760>two <00:42:51.319>the - <00:42:51.760>
pin <00:42:52.000>cards <00:42:52.280>I <00:42:52.440>have - <00:42:55.079>
you <00:42:55.319>both <00:42:55.559>up <00:42:56.119>uh
Summary:
The committee first held a public hearing on HB 660, which would require historic horse racing facilities to pay 10% of HHR winnings to host communities as mitigation. Representative Om said the amendment was intended to leave charities and the state whole while funding local costs tied to large gaming facilities. Supporters argued the measure would address future municipal expenses, while opponents said host towns have not reported current problems and that the bill would single out one industry. Members questioned the 10% rate, whether the proposal was retroactive, and whether it would apply to existing facilities; the sponsor said it would apply to facilities already in place or later added. The hearing was then closed without any vote recorded in the transcript.
The committee then opened a hearing on HB 658-FN, which raises reimbursement caps and adjusts fees for the Oil Discharge and Disposal Cleanup Fund and the Oil Pollution Control Fund. Representative Malloy introduced the bill, and Representative Aly explained the funds as a state-backed insurance mechanism for oil spill cleanup and prevention, including replacement of leaking home heating oil tanks for low-income homeowners. Bob Scully of the Energy Marketers Association supported the bill, saying the fee structure helps fund remediation and tank replacement, though costs are ultimately passed on to consumers. Department of Environmental Services officials Robert Bishop and Jennifer Marts described the bill as extending the fee collection for 10 years, changing reporting dates, increasing the cap for low-income tank replacement, and rebalancing fees based on an actuarial review.
DES testified that the actuarial study found the fund needed to remain solvent and that home heating oil releases are the largest category of new releases, with the fuel oil fee otherwise needing to rise by more than 200% to cover projected costs. The board instead proposed a smaller increase and adjusted other fees accordingly, while maintaining a reserve to cover the first days of a major coastal spill before federal funds become available. Members asked about the basis for the fee changes, the role of the actuarial review, and the statutory language governing who pays the fees. The transcript ends during this hearing, with no final committee action or vote shown.
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session-Day 12, February 23, 2026-AM
Wyoming House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:42:02.160>
I <00:42:02.400>think <00:42:02.480>we <00:42:02.640>do <00:42:07.280>They <00:42:07.440>have <00:42:07.599>stated <00:42:07.920> - <00:42:12.640>
from <00:42:13.200>uh <00:42:13.599>where <00:42:13.839>Chief< - <00:42:17.760>
We <00:42:17.920>have <00:42:18.000>a <00:42:18.240>record - <00:44:25.839>
Uh section C article 1 section 38. Uh section C article 1 section 38.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- I just wanted to mention this same section<01:42:49.320>
of <01:42:49.440>statute <01:42 - :50.280>
that <01:42:50.520>you're <01:42:50.680>seeing section of statute that - you're seeing section of statute that you're seeing subdivision<01:42:51.800>
three. - >> Well, if you look at CFR Title 42, section 455.23, right?
- ,<02:31:25.680>
sections <02:31:26.120>455.23, title 42, sections 455.23, title 42,
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- That equates<00:42:32.079>
to <00:42:33.040>this <00:42:33.359>bill <00:42:34.240 - that<00:42:37.839>
you <00:42:38.079>are <00:42:38.319>putting <00:42:38.640> - >
We <00:42:40.800>are <00:42:40.960>not <00:42:41.119>a <00:42:41.280> - We have<00:42:43.440>
never <00:42:43.760>been <00:42:43.920>a <00:42:44.079> - <02:42:05.680>
And <02:42:05.920>so, <02:42:06.160>he's <02:42:06.640>he<
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
LBT, LBT DEFER Public Hearings 02-13-2026
Transcript Highlights:
- If not, um members,<00:42:09.200>
we'll <00:42:09.440>do <00:42:09.520>a <00:42:09.680 - A short recess<00:42:12.960>
subject <00:42:13.119>to <00:42:13.280>the <00:42:13.359 - We'll start<00:42:42.720>
first <00:42:42.880>off <00:42:43.040>with <00:42:43.280 - This<00:42:45.280>
is <00:42:45.440>relating <00:42:45.760>to <00:42:45.920>the - <00:42:48.720>
Um <00:42:49.119>chair <00:42:49.359>is <00:42:49.520>going
Summary:
The committee first took up SB 2567, a Judiciary package measure concerning temporary restraining orders for threats and harassment tied to a public employee’s official actions. Representatives from the Attorney General’s Office and the Judiciary said they had worked out a compromise to address earlier concerns, including a two-year pilot project, broader coverage for state officers and employees across all branches and counties, a special fund to pay for private counsel in some cases, and authority for Judiciary staff attorneys or Judiciary funds to represent Judiciary personnel. Members asked about coverage for retired judges, funding limits, and whether the measure could be used for workplace disputes; the witnesses said retired judges and per diem judges could be covered if the harassment related to their work, the fund would be limited and subject to available appropriations, and petitions would not be allowed between employees in the same branch. The chair recommended passage with amendments, and the committee adopted the recommendation unanimously.
The committee then heard SB 2448, which creates a civil remedy for the unauthorized disclosure of intimate images under the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act. The bill’s proponent from the Uniform Law Commission explained that a plaintiff would need to show intentional disclosure or threat of disclosure of a private intimate image without consent, and said the privacy question would be fact-specific. Supporters, including the Commission on the Status of Women and Imua Alliance, favored giving survivors civil recourse. Opponents from the Sex Abuse Treatment Center and others warned that the term "private" could invite victim-blaming and broad discovery into a survivor’s past, while still acknowledging the need for some privacy limitation to avoid overbreadth, especially for people who intentionally distribute intimate content online.
Committee members questioned whether the definition of "private" should be tightened. The bill’s proponent said the term should remain because it aligns with the related criminal statute and helps keep the measure focused on classic revenge-porn situations, while still allowing Hawaii-specific changes if needed. The committee did not take final action on SB 2448 in the portion provided, but testimony and discussion centered on balancing survivor protections with concerns about discovery and the scope of liability.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session 4/25/25 - Part 2
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- There<00:42:12.240>
are <00:42:12.400>projects <00:42:12.800>being <00:42:13.040> - :42:17.680>
habitat <00:42:18.160>in <00:42:18.400>your <00:42:18.640>district - <00:42:27.599>
Members, <00:42:28.079>please <00:42:28.319>vote <00:42:28.640 - :00.639>
What <01:42:00.800>I <01:42:01.040>would <01:42:01.280>ask <01:42 - take<01:42:03.199>
a <01:42:03.360>step <01:42:03.520>back <01:42:03.760>