Transcript Highlights:

• But what keeps that entity from transferring? for other money and then applying for this grant. Mr.
• If you had an entity, would it be the expectation, Mr.
• But you're saying that it wouldn't necessarily be covered under this, Mr.
• Have these entities, rural health care facilities, applying for this.
• In reimbursement to cover their operating costs.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then, um, but also when you look at just the organization of a school entity, I can't, I would be
• The fee for the whole year is covered, and we cover the rest. Thank you, Representative Down.
• So they cannot just kind of sweep us, you know, under the cover or under the rug. So, thank you.
• Because there are some non-profits or some entities that come in and they do food donations.
• Basically, let me just cover how state police gets involved from the alert perspective.

Transcript Highlights:

• They're commercial coverage covering these services.
• Covered California is, of course, our state's health benefit exchange.
• Covered California is underway implementing this program.
• And non-citizens are also less likely to be covered by job-based coverage.
• Covered California didn't look at that.

Summary: The subcommittee heard a lengthy Department of Health Care Services presentation on the governor’s Medi-Cal budget, including a $229.1 billion total-funds proposal, projected Medi-Cal enrollment declines as redeterminations continue, and several major cost drivers such as managed care growth, Medicare-related costs, pharmacy spending, and changes tied to federal policy. Members focused heavily on the elimination of Prop. 56 dental supplemental payments beginning July 1, 2026, questioning the likely impact on provider participation and utilization. DHCS said it is completing the required rate reduction/access analysis for CMS, has been holding stakeholder meetings and issuing provider bulletins, but could not yet quantify the real-world effect. The committee also discussed a $50 million savings proposal tied to new hospice utilization management authority and asked about possible effects on emergency dental care and provider participation. The hearing then moved through the November 2025 family health estimate and several county and program administration issues, including CCS, GHPP, and Every Woman Counts. DHCS said family health costs are rising despite slight caseload declines because of higher utilization and medical costs, and members raised concerns about CCS website accessibility, county administrative funding, and the transition of youth aging out of CCS. The department said most CCS beneficiaries are also on Medi-Cal, that counties have long raised funding concerns, and that it had clarified use of maintenance-and-operations dollars to address some county workload issues. Members also asked about Every Woman Counts potentially seeing higher demand as Medi-Cal changes take effect; DHCS said that is possible and that the program has multiple funding sources including General Fund. A major portion of the hearing focused on provider taxes and federal changes under H.R. 1, especially the Medi-Cal managed care organization tax and the hospital quality assurance fee. DHCS explained that H.R. 1 restricts new or increased health care-related taxes, phases down allowable tax levels over time, and tightens “generally redistributive” rules, which could sharply reduce the state’s ability to use the MCO tax for Medi-Cal financing. Members asked whether the Legislature could amend Prop. 35 or whether voters would need to act; DHCS said a three-fourths legislative amendment may be possible if it aligns with the measure’s purpose, but the department is still evaluating options. The committee also discussed hospital financing, with DHCS describing recent increases in state-directed payments and the effect of H.R. 1 in capping those payments at Medicare levels, and the LAO noting the tradeoff between preserving provider taxes and maintaining Medi-Cal funding. The subcommittee also reviewed a series of DHCS budget change proposals and trailer bill items, including managed care final-rule implementation, managed care operations, a hospital value strategy, a one-year extension of skilled nursing facility financing, long-term care payment transparency, and interoperability/prior authorization requirements. Members repeatedly questioned the use of limited-term versus permanent positions, the overlap among proposals, and the timing of new financing reforms. DHCS said the SNF extension would preserve current workforce standards, sanctions, growth limits, and the SNF quality assurance fee while the department develops a broader 2027-28 redesign. No votes were taken; items were repeatedly held open for later action. Covered California then presented on the expiration of the federal enhanced premium tax credit and the resulting affordability crisis. The agency said Californians will lose about $2.5 billion in premium assistance for 2026, average premiums could nearly double for many enrollees, and as many as 400,000 people could eventually leave marketplace coverage. Open enrollment ended with 1.9 million sign-ups, down 3% from the prior year, with especially steep declines among middle-income consumers and increased movement into bronze plans. Covered California said the state’s $190 million affordability subsidy is helping lower-income enrollees retain coverage, but cannot fully replace the lost federal assistance. Members also asked about the Health Care Affordability Reserve Fund, repayment of loans from that fund, the status of federal review of California’s essential health benefits benchmark, and implementation of the new gender-affirming care benefit under AB 144.

Transcript Highlights:

• , including... ...including NGOs such as Ducks Unlimited, local entities such as counties and cities,
• , including NGOs such as Ducks Unlimited, local entities such as counties and cities, and other state
• We cover the entirety of the state of Idaho.
• We are a local government entity with elected board members and volunteer associate supervisors.
• And so if I just take a little brief look back at what we've covered, districts support our communities

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The Senate Agricultural Committee opened by welcoming a BYU-Idaho agribusiness class visiting the committee, then took up a rule docket, 020601-2501. Senator Lakey moved to approve the docket except for section 112, new subsections 01 through 05, which were rejected because the incorporated-by-reference documents lacked a specific date, creating a conflict with the Administrative Procedures Act. The motion carried. The committee then printed two RSs. RS 33272, presented by Senator Nichols, would create standards for kratom products, preserving access to natural leaf kratom while prohibiting adulterated or artificially enhanced products, requiring limited third-party testing, setting an age restriction, and clarifying supply-chain responsibilities. RS 33226, presented by Senator Lakey, is the Idaho Direct to Consumer Act, aimed at reducing regulation on small-scale homemade food and non-alcoholic beverage sales, including direct farm and ranch sales, while keeping basic labeling, recordkeeping, and food-safety education requirements. Both RSs were moved to print without opposition. The Idaho Department of Water Resources, speaking through the Soil and Water Conservation Commission, gave an agency update on district support, conservation programs, and budget requests. Staff described funding distributed to the 50 conservation districts, CREP and water-quality work, and the Water Quality Program for Agriculture (WQPA), which has seen strong demand and funded many projects statewide. In response to a question, Director Weaver said WQPA is not included in the governor’s budget. The Idaho Association of Soil Conservation Districts then emphasized the value of locally led, voluntary conservation, citing education, infrastructure, and wildfire-related projects, and said districts return $2.82 in local benefit for every state dollar invested. No further actions were taken before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Co-locating them in a fusion center breaks down the arm's-length relationships between these entities
• Co-locating them in a fusion center breaks down the arm's length relationships between these entities
• For example, SB 34 rightfully prohibited the sharing of ALPR data with out-of-state entities.
• Data sets that are owned by non-governmental entities.
• Fusion centers are partnerships between federal, state, and local entities, and while our work would

Summary: The committee met as a subcommittee because it initially lacked a quorum, heard a status update from State Auditor Grant Parks, and reviewed several new audit requests. Parks reported that 10 previously requested audits were underway, with most expected to be released in spring/summer and one pesticide audit still pending; he also noted ongoing litigation with Huntington Beach over a 2024 audit. He said the office had grown to just over 200 employees and could start about five new JALAC audits between April and July. The committee also noted that one Prop. 28 request was being held and one PUC-related request was moved off consent to the regular calendar. Senator Cervantes presented an audit request on California fusion centers, arguing they operate with little public oversight and may collect, share, and store sensitive information without adequate transparency or safeguards. Supporters, including former FBI agent Mike German and ACLU California Action, said fusion centers function as secretive intelligence-sharing hubs that can produce inaccurate or biased reports and may undermine privacy and civil liberties. Parks said the audit would examine the State Threat Assessment Center and two local fusion centers, focusing on oversight, legal authority, data quality, unauthorized disclosure controls, use of private vendors, funding, and performance metrics, while warning of likely access and public-disclosure limitations. The request drew sharp opposition from Assembly Member DeMaio, who called it a politicized “witch hunt,” but public comment included support from the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Senator Allen then presented an audit of the Public Utilities Commission’s enforcement of Rule 21 interconnection timelines for customer-sited solar and storage projects. He and witnesses said utilities have repeatedly missed deadlines, causing long delays and added costs for schools, nonprofits, and other customers; CPUC staff responded that the commission adopted timelines and compliance benchmarks in 2020, publishes quarterly data, and is already pursuing the issue through workshops and an open proceeding. Parks said the audit would assess CPUC monitoring, enforcement tools, and reasons for utility noncompliance. Public comment was mixed, with solar advocates supporting the request and PG&E objecting on process grounds and arguing the commission’s ongoing proceeding should address the issue. Senator Perez, with Senator Fong, requested an audit of Caltrans’ administration of the former SR 710 corridor property sales and affordable housing program. They described tenant complaints about mold, pests, deferred maintenance, inconsistent pricing and eligibility information, and possible failures to inform residents of purchase rights; Caltrans said it is working to complete sales and has already closed 59 properties since fiscal year 2024-25. Parks said the audit would examine compliance with the Roberti Act, pricing, appraisals, communications, rent accounting, property maintenance, and follow-up on prior recommendations. Finally, Senator Umberg requested an audit of the Orange County Board of Education, citing transparency, litigation spending, charter authorization, procurement, and whistleblower concerns; after quorum was established, Parks said the audit would review Brown Act and Public Records Act compliance, public resource use, contracting, litigation costs, charter oversight, and retaliation complaints.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> communities, paying mortgages, covering communities, paying mortgages, covering medical<00:09:58.640
• this bill would regulate was one entity he approached.
• this bill would regulate was one entity he approached.
• </c><00:30:24.799><c> that</c> benefits and one of these entities that benefits and one of these entities
• </c> this bill would regulate was one entity this bill would regulate was one entity he<00:30:28.159>

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They’re commercial coverage covering these services.
• Covered California is, of course, our state's health benefit exchange.
• Covered California is underway implementing this program.
• Many working families can barely cover our basic expenses each month.
• Covered California didn’t look at that.

Summary: The subcommittee heard an overview of the Department of Health Care Services’ proposed budget, including a $229.1 billion total-funds budget and projected Medi-Cal enrollment decline as redeterminations continue. Members focused heavily on the fiscal and programmatic effects of prior budget solutions and federal changes, especially the elimination of General Fund-supported Prop. 56 dental supplemental payments beginning July 1, 2026, the hospice utilization-management change, and the impact of reduced caseloads alongside rising health care costs. DHCS said it is still completing required access and rate-reduction analyses for the dental cuts and has been engaging stakeholders, but could not yet quantify the real-world effect on utilization or provider participation. The committee also reviewed the November 2025 Medi-Cal local assistance estimate, which shows higher General Fund spending despite lower enrollment, driven by managed care rate growth, Medicare cost growth, state-only claiming, and federal policy changes. The hearing then turned to provider taxes and federal H.R. 1 constraints, with extensive discussion of the MCO tax, the hospital quality assurance fee, and other health care-related taxes. DHCS explained that H.R. 1 phases down allowable tax levels and tightens “generally redistributive” rules, making the current MCO tax structure and the proposed higher hospital fee levels difficult or impossible to renew as originally designed. Staff and the LAO described the tradeoff between preserving Medi-Cal funding and avoiding higher costs on private providers and consumers. Members asked about options for preserving revenue, including possible amendments to Prop. 35 or returning to voters, and were told the department is still evaluating approaches while federal guidance remains in flux. The committee also reviewed hospital payment increases already implemented through state-directed payments, with DHCS noting that H.R. 1 will force those payments down to Medicare levels over time. Several budget change proposals were discussed and left open, including requests tied to the managed care final rule, managed care operations, hospital value strategy, long-term care payment transparency, and interoperability requirements. The committee also heard about a one-year trailer bill extension for skilled nursing facility financing, including continuation of the SNF workforce standards program, the SNF quality assurance fee, and annual rate growth, while the department develops a longer-term financing redesign for 2027-28. Members expressed skepticism about repeated rate reform efforts and questioned whether a one-year extension of the eliminated workforce quality incentive program should be restored during the transition. Finally, Covered California presented its budget and enrollment update, reporting that the expiration of the federal enhanced premium tax credit is expected to reduce affordability significantly, with average premiums roughly doubling for many enrollees and as many as 400,000 Californians potentially losing marketplace coverage over time. The exchange said California’s $190 million subsidy program is helping lower-income enrollees, but not enough to offset the federal loss, and it is also implementing a new gender-affirming care benefit and awaiting federal action on benchmark plan changes.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's already covered under federal law. You're correct.
• It's already covered under federal law, and it's already covered under state law.
• It's already covered under federal law. I've already covered. You're correct.
• It's already covered under federal law, and it's already covered under state law.
• I shouldn't be forced by a government entity to accept something.

Bills: S0330, S0526, S0862, S1072, S1078, S1192, S1250, S1296, S1298, S1642, S1698, S7022

Keywords: firefighter disability, law enforcement disability, correctional officer disability, correctional probation officer, presumptive disability, workers' compensation, line of duty presumption, heart disease presumption, hypertension presumption, tuberculosis presumption, public safety employees, first responders, physical examination, preemployment exam, medical specialist, Medicare reimbursement, employing agency, Florida Statutes 112.18, Florida Statutes 943.13, occupational disease

Summary: The committee heard several bills and confirmations, with most measures reported favorably. Senate Bill 330 clarified the heart disease presumption for firefighters, law enforcement, and correctional officers, codifying the medical definition of heart disease and allowing transferring law enforcement officers to rely on a prior physical if a new agency does not provide one. Support was waived in by the Florida Smart Justice Alliance and the Fraternal Order of Police, and the bill passed unanimously. Senate Bill 526, as amended by a delete-all amendment, addressed commercial construction contracts, permit standards, fee reductions when private providers are used, floodproofing, product approval categories, and adoption of certain electrical code standards; it drew support from several construction and business groups and one opposing appearance, then was reported favorably. Senate Bill 1192 created a pilot program for callback queues at the Department of Commerce and Department of Children and Families to reduce hold times for callers seeking re-employment assistance and public benefits, and it also passed favorably. Senate Bill 1078 established transition procedures for a governor-elect, including agency liaisons, briefing materials, office space, and access to records; an amendment shifted IT support to the Department of Management Services, narrowed access to confidential records, and increased penalties for unauthorized disclosure, after which the bill was approved. Senate Bill 7022 extended a public records exemption for classroom examinations and assessment instruments through 2031 and expanded coverage to school district boards and public schools; it was also reported favorably. Senate Bill 862, as amended, set a $60,000 salary goal by 2030 for state correctional officers, probation officers, and institutional security specialists, with annual raises subject to appropriations; members and witnesses emphasized recruitment, retention, and safety, and the bill passed. Senate Bill 1250 removed the requirement that the Commission on Human Relations use registered mail for certain notices under the Florida Civil Rights Act, allowing less expensive notice methods, and it was reported favorably. Senate Bill 1698 allowed certain employers to post required workplace notices electronically instead of physically, and it passed without opposition. The committee also recommended confirmation of 10 appointees to the Florida Commission on Human Relations and the State Retirement Commission. The most extensive debate centered on Senate Bill 1072, which created an anti-Semitism task force within the Department of Legal Affairs to review anti-Semitism in Florida, improve community relations, advise on law enforcement training, assess digital media literacy efforts, evaluate hate crime statutes, and recommend policy changes. The sponsor said the bill was intended to address a growing problem and noted that Florida already uses the Holocaust Remembrance definition of anti-Semitism in statute. Numerous speakers opposed the bill, arguing it could chill protected speech, especially criticism of Israel, and could be used selectively against students, activists, Muslims, Arabs, and Jewish anti-Zionists; several also said existing hate-crime and civil-rights laws were sufficient and that the task force should include protections against Islamophobia and anti-Arab hate. One member raised concerns about the constitutionality of creating such task forces in light of prior actions by the Attorney General. Despite the opposition, the bill was reported favorably on a party-line style vote with Senator Bracey Davis voting yes along with the majority. Senate Bill 1642, the Freedom in the Workplace Act, was also heard and drew significant questioning. The bill would bar public employers and contractors from requiring pronoun use, certain gender-identity-related training, or non-binary sex options on forms, and would protect employees and contractors from adverse action based on religious, moral, conscience-based, or biology-based beliefs. Senator Polsky questioned whether the bill could interfere with anti-harassment training and workplace discipline, while the sponsor said the measure was meant to prevent government coercion and extend protections similar to those in school settings. The transcript cuts off before the final disposition of this bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Further, I'll read from this note: "Expanding this tax credit to corporate entities further increases
• So again, the exempt entity in place, this situation would be UNM.
• Chair, um, Vice Chair Kadina, American Campus Communities is a for-profit entity.
• Because The improvements are owned by the exempt entity. Would that be correct? Yes. OK.
• Chairman, and I guess I don't have that one, but would that be covered, and Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• Services, which was running a trust Case we brought against an entity called CLA State Services, which
• These are entities and individuals who dishonestly claim that they're a charity.
• But another version of false charity is one where an entity might But another version of false charity
• None of the for-profit entities file public 990s or reports with the IRS.
• So one of the biggest keys would be to require the entity that's engaging in this process to at least

Keywords: 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• and county juvenile detention centers around the state, and we've begun conversations with those entities
• So I'm wondering if Medicaid was not covering them, how would we be paying for those services? Mr.
• Generally speaking, under the Eighth Amendment, the entity that's incarcerating the individual bears
• So I'm wondering if Medicaid was not covering them, how would we be paying for those services?
• Generally speaking, under the Eighth Amendment, the entity that's incarcerating the individual bears

Summary: The House Health and Welfare Committee approved the minutes from January 28 and 29 and then took up a previously held administrative rule docket from the Department of Health and Welfare on reportable diseases. Jared Larson said the rule mainly reorganizes existing provisions, with two substantive changes involving lead and hemorrhagic fevers. Members asked about the definition of a “suspected case,” and Dr. Christine Hahn explained that certain urgent diseases, such as measles or tuberculosis, may need to be reported before lab confirmation so public health can respond quickly. The committee voted to adopt the rule docket. The committee then heard RS 32849, which would direct the state to seek a federal waiver to provide 30 days of case management services for juveniles under 19 leaving state or local correctional settings, as required by federal law. Larson said the proposal is not discretionary, is subject to appropriation, and is intended to avoid possible Medicaid funding penalties. He estimated an ongoing general fund cost of about $311,000 and federal funds of about $635,000 if implemented in fiscal year 2028. Members questioned who qualifies as an eligible juvenile, whether youth with private insurance would be forced onto Medicaid, and what the potential CMS penalties might be if Idaho does not comply. Larson said the services would not require a switch from private insurance and that he could not yet specify the penalty amount. Representative Wheeler moved to introduce RS 32849, and the motion passed. Before adjourning, the chair said House Bill 497 would be held while the committee waits for more information about concerns being discussed on the Senate side. The committee also noted it would likely meet at 8:30 a.m. on Friday because the floor session is scheduled for 9:00 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• are given... ...program where agricultural entities are given incentives to replace their tractors for
• I'm so sorry; we're trying to cover a number of committee hearings.
• No, there wasn’t enough betting to cover it. No, there wasn’t enough betting to cover it.
• So we felt, or I felt, that... no there wasn't enough matting to cover it there wasn't enough horses
• They'll cover up to $2 million. That wouldn't do it.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That grant covers about 75% of our funding. The state pays the remaining 25%.
• That grant covers 75 percent of our funding and comes with conditions on what we can and cannot do.
• It wouldn't give us identical access, particularly if it doesn't cover payment information that would
• So those are covered, and I too really appreciate the additional suggestions made.
• This bill, 289-1, doesn't cover that; it covers government grants.

Bills: HF3043, HF2891

Keywords: public safety, illegal remunerations, healthcare fraud, grants, criminal penalties, state law, grants management, state employees training, certification, monitoring grants, accountability, grant fraud

Transcript Highlights:

• One of them covers irrigation districts, one of them covers water conservancy district, and then one
• </c><00:36:45.359><c> of</c><00:36:45.440><c> them</c> covers irrigation districts, one of them covers
• Um, yes, other states have cover there.
• </c><02:43:20.640><c> to</c> but it allows individuals or entities to but it allows individuals or entities
• ,</c> it comes in and it brings in entities, it comes in and it brings in entities, it<02:43:25.520><

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• transparent, and efficient permitting process, reduces disputes between utilities and attaching entities
• The Commission worked with electric utilities and pole attaching entities to receive straw man proposals
• , and other interested parties. with investor-owned electric utilities, pole attaching entities, and
• These comments covered a wide range of topics, including language around uncared violations, unauthorized
• Key definitions include attaching entities, coordination between attaching entities, which examples of

Keywords: 989, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 9 and 10, then took up rules for the Idaho Public Utilities Commission governing pole attachments and telecom utility access. Taylor Thomas explained the rulemaking was intended to implement House Bill 180A and create an Idaho-specific permitting framework for pole attachments, with stakeholder negotiations leading to changes on definitions, standardized calendar-day timelines, non-discriminatory access, make-ready work, and dispute resolution. Members asked about the main sticking points in negotiations, including uncured violations, unauthorized attachments, fee structures, and enforcement; Thomas said several of those provisions were removed as beyond legislative intent. The committee approved the docket. The committee then heard rules from the Idaho State Police Alcohol Beverage Control division. Lieutenant Colonel Russ Wheatley said the changes were based on prior committee feedback and public meetings, and focused on clarifying what it means for a liquor license to be in “actual use,” removing duplicative statutory language, and revising multipurpose arena rules to make them less restrictive. The proposed changes would eliminate requirements such as a security-staff ratio, certain beverage-transaction policies, diagrams of alcohol-service areas, and monthly schedules for private-event venues. Members asked about age requirements for alcohol servers, speculation in liquor licenses, and how ABC monitors whether a license is being used; Wheatley said unused licenses can be reclaimed through administrative action. During discussion, Wheatley also addressed the fiscal impact of changes to liquor-license transfers, saying the loss of transfer-fee revenue has created about a $900,000 shortfall for ABC and could affect staffing, enforcement, and license processing times. He said the division currently has 11 detectives and that delays in licensing could grow if funding is not restored. The committee then approved the alcohol beverage control docket and adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• CEQA already covers air quality.
• If it's already covered by CEQA, then there's no need for another analysis.
• If it's already covered by CEQA, then there's no need for another analysis.
• SB 1171 would make any private entity that contracts with U.S.
• So we're not talking about those kinds of entities.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• housing programs while one entity is running shelter programs.
• They were, I feel, thoroughly covered by Dr.
• They were, I feel, thoroughly covered by Dr.
• Do you take steps to root that out, or is that also the other entity that would monitor that?
• And I was intending to ask what the last panel just covered.

Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee 4 met to hear an information-only agenda focused on homelessness. The chair and vice chair opened with remarks about affordability, accountability, and the need for flexible but effective state responses. The committee then heard an update from Dr. Ryan Finnegan of UC Berkeley’s Turner Center on homelessness trends, data limitations, and program impacts. He said homelessness remains high, with 2024 point-in-time counts showing about 187,000 people experiencing homelessness statewide, though unsheltered homelessness has declined somewhat as shelter capacity expanded. He emphasized that California’s high housing costs and shortage of affordable housing are the main drivers, while also noting persistent racial disparities, high chronic homelessness, and the importance of coordinated housing, health, and social services. He also warned that cuts or changes to federal programs and state funding streams like HAP could threaten progress. Members questioned Dr. Finnegan about the 9% decline in unsheltered homelessness, the timing and methodology of point-in-time counts, how to interpret trends over time, and the role of policy changes such as Housing First, Proposition 47, and Martin v. Boise. He explained that the 9% figure came from 30 continuums of care that had completed 2025 counts, and that HUD’s eventual statewide number would likely differ because not all regions counted that year. He also discussed how different funding sources are layered in local programs, including HAP, local funds, philanthropic support, federal funds, and CalAIM reimbursements. Several members stressed the need for clearer, more comparable measures of effectiveness and outcomes, including whether programs reduce long-term homelessness and move people toward self-sufficiency. The committee then heard from the California Interagency Council on Homelessness on statewide data systems, especially the Homeless Data Integration System (HDIS). Staff described HDIS as the first state-level integrated homelessness data system, built from local HMIS data and used to track demographics, services, outcomes, and program performance across all 44 continuums of care. They said HDIS has enabled statewide dashboards, system performance measures, and new accountability tools under AB 977 and AB 799. Cal ICH also said HAP Round 4 was highly cost-effective under the State Auditor’s methodology, estimating a cost of about $9,172 per person permanently housed, and that new AB 799 dashboards are intended to provide clearer public reporting on outcomes, fiscal data, and progress toward statewide goals. Members asked about measuring self-sufficiency, identifying the best local partners, detecting fraud, and whether the new dashboards will allow better comparisons among program types and funding uses. No votes were taken, and the one scheduled vote was postponed.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2133 is about verification and consent requirements for commercial entities that publish or
• The bill primarily regulates commercial entities that publish or distribute sexual material online to
• The bill primarily regulates commercial entities that publish or distribute sexual material online to
• Thus, that act immunizes entities like websites, for example, from liability for those things posted
• There are other clauses in the bill, for example, that allow these entities to continue...

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Is it, again, is the state involved, or is it another entity? Representative Monks?
• Both entities respectfully opposed House Bill 670 and request that it be held in committee.
• calculation formula to fire and EMS isn't going to solve long-term budget capacity issues for those entities
• Sayers, I think they covered most of the... I’m so eloquent by Ms. Conrad and Mr. Sayers.
• I think they covered most of what I wanted to cover, but there is pending litigation over this bill currently

Summary: The Senate Local Government and Taxation Committee heard three House bills. House Bill 734, presented by Rep. Ben Furman, would change how wind and geothermal tax revenues are distributed to school districts that do not have supplemental levies, using the county levy rate instead. Furman said the bill closes an unintended loophole and does not change total revenue or affect solar. After brief questions, the committee voted to send HB 734 to the floor with a due pass recommendation. House Bill 670, presented by Rep. Monks, would clarify last year’s urban renewal law regarding whether fire protection and ambulance districts may withdraw from existing or new urban renewal districts when there are no outstanding bonds or contractual obligations funded by district revenues. Monks said the bill is meant to reflect legislative intent and address ongoing litigation. Testimony from the Association of Idaho Cities, the Redevelopment Association of Idaho, and Garden City Urban Renewal Agency opposed the bill, arguing it could increase ambiguity and litigation and that the courts should resolve the current disputes first. The committee voted to send HB 670 to the 14th order for possible amendment. House Bill 658, also presented by Rep. Birch, would create a process for county commissioners to fill vacancies on cemetery maintenance district boards when a quorum is lost, and would allow counties to handle temporary district functions until a board is restored. Birch said the bill responds to a cemetery district board vacancy problem and has support from local government associations. The committee asked a few light questions and then passed HB 658 to the floor with a due pass recommendation before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• As a branch, I'll highlight a few discussion items that Carl will cover.
• I'm glad we started to cover the behavioral health update.
• It'll cover that.
• So, something that's not generally covered from the treatment courts.
• Um, I think, let's see, with respect to that, I think we've covered again.