Transcript Highlights:

• I'm Brad Hagar, the fiscal analysis department covering the environment and then the Legacy committees
• oh Mr Hagar I'm Brad Hagar the host oh Mr Hagar I'm Brad Hagar the host fiscal<00:05:24.160> analysis
• c><00:05:24.560> Department<00:05:24.880> covering<00:05:25.160> the fiscal analysis
• Department covering the fiscal analysis Department covering the environment<00:05:25.639> and
• <01:00:00.559> problems<01:00:00.880> short can cause behavioral problems short can

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• The speaker says this is the everyday kind of behavior.
• I think most of the problem behavior I think most of the problem isn't<01:25:52.119> direct<01
• This decision determined that its analysis of Citizens United required it to conclude that the government
• 36:14.800> determined<01:36:15.320> that<01:36:15.480> its<01:36:16.119> analysis
• <01:36:17.119> of decision determined that its analysis of decision determined that its analysis

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Elections Committee met on February 6, 2025, and first considered the reappointment of Steven Swanson to the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board. Swanson described his background in legal aid, lobbying, judging, and international rule-of-law work, and said he wanted to continue serving the public. Committee members praised his experience and discussed the importance of campaign finance oversight, including preventing corporate participation in Minnesota elections. Senator Wosinski moved to recommend Swanson’s confirmation, and the motion was adopted. The committee then heard Senate File 529, a proposed constitutional amendment to state that elections shall be free, fair, and equal, and that no civil or military power may interfere with the free exercise of the right to vote. Senator Dibble presented the bill as a way to strengthen voting rights and provide a constitutional basis to challenge voter suppression, gerrymandering, and unfair campaign practices. Testimony in support came from David Fischer of Clean Elections Minnesota and Jean Massie of Fair Vote Minnesota, both of whom argued the amendment would protect access to voting, increase confidence in elections, and align Minnesota with other states that have similar language. Members discussed whether the amendment’s broad language could invite judicial interpretation or affect future election laws. Senator Koran questioned how the proposal would improve Minnesota’s already high turnout, while Senator Grant raised concerns that the terms “free, fair, and equal” were undefined and could shift power to the courts. Senator Lucero proposed an oral amendment to add “ensuring one eligible citizen, one vote” after the word “equal,” saying it would address concerns about future voter ID laws. The amendment was restated by counsel and discussed, with Senator Dibble saying it did not significantly harm the bill but suggesting it might imply a requirement he did not intend. The transcript ends during discussion of that oral amendment, and no final vote on the bill itself is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• I looked at their website: 26 THC products and not a single certificate of analysis.
• It's called a certificate of analysis, and this is a full-panel party tested.
• Another one is marijuana use is associated with worse outcomes in symptom severity and violent behavior
• That shows you that what they're doing, like bill tracking and legislative analysis, doesn't require
• I wanted to know the cost-benefit analysis of why we were doing it. They had nothing. I sued them.

Bills: SB 5, SB 11, SB 12

Keywords: disaster relief, flood preparedness, emergency funding, local government support, meteorological forecasting, human trafficking, trafficking victim, compelling prostitution, affirmative defense, criminal defense, coercion, force fraud or coercion, sexual exploitation, victim protection, Penal Code, Texas criminal law, prosecution, party liability, affirmative defense statute, survivor rights

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs took up Senate Bill 5, which Senator Perry described as a ban on intoxicating THC consumer products while preserving legal CBD, CBG, hemp seed, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil products. Perry argued that most retail THC products are already illegal under federal law, that the industry has used loopholes and misleading labeling to sell high-potency products, and that regulation would be ineffective because chemists can quickly alter formulations. He also said the bill would steer people with medical needs toward the Texas Compassionate Use Program (T-Cup), which he and other supporters described as the proper physician-guided alternative. Committee members and witnesses repeatedly discussed the distinction between legal hemp-derived products and intoxicating THC products, and Perry said the bill would not touch non-consumable hemp uses such as fiber and clothing. Invited testimony came from law enforcement and medical witnesses who supported the bill. Texas Police Chiefs Association representative Steve Dye, Kaufman County District Attorney Early Wiley, and Chambers County Sheriff Brian Hawthorne all said regulation would be too costly, too complex, and ultimately unenforceable, while a ban would be clearer and easier to enforce. They cited overloaded DPS labs, the need for expensive private testing, limited police and prosecutor resources, and the difficulty of keeping up with constantly changing cannabinoids and out-of-state products. Hawthorne and Wiley described raids and investigations involving warehouses, retail stores, cash seizures, and products they said were marketed to young people and often mislabeled or imported from other states. They also said the bill would help law enforcement by creating a clearer legal line and protecting legitimate CBD/CBG businesses. Dr. Lindy McGee, speaking for the Texas Medical Association and Texas Pediatric Society, testified that retail THC products pose serious risks to children and adolescents, including addiction, impaired brain development, psychosis, suicide attempts, self-harm, accidental toddler ingestions, and possible long-term cognitive effects. She said there is no effective medication treatment for THC addiction comparable to nicotine cessation tools, and she supported restrictions such as child-resistant packaging, no marketing to minors, and age limits, while opposing criminal penalties for possession by minors. Senators asked follow-up questions about brain development, memory, dementia risk, pregnancy, and cardiovascular effects. No vote was taken during the portion provided, and the committee continued with invited testimony and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• take a survey about how<01:29:09.000> their<01:29:09.199> travel<01:29:09.520> Behavior
• The blue line is a projection from a UHERO analysis done on behalf of the Department of Health, where
• The blue line is a projection from a UHERO analysis done on behalf of the Department of Health, where
• in the European Union and is shown to reduce their emissions, and also that's where you see the analysis
• of it not really you see the analysis of it not really hurting<01:47:34.840> the<01:47:35.040

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The last thing is just from an analysis in 2016, which was the last major drought Massachusetts had:
• According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis Outdoor Recreation Satellite Account, recreational boating
• myself, does the Water Pollution Abatement Revolving Fund cover the projected cost if you did an analysis
• Community Land and Water Coalition over the past six months to develop preliminary environmental analysis
• This analysis is reviewed by the appropriate government agency before a project is permitted.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The hearing covered a broad set of environmental and water-related bills, with much of the testimony focused on blue economy and circular economy proposals, drought management, drinking water safety, flood resilience, and water infrastructure funding. Supporters of bills such as H. 987 and H. 988 described grant programs for blue economy workforce development, research, small businesses, and public education about a circular economy. Other speakers backed measures on coastal erosion research, recreational boating dredging, cranberry water-right transfers, sand mining oversight, and a voucher program for home water filtration in PFAS-impacted communities. Several elected officials and advocates also urged passage of bills to require private well testing, improve school drinking water safety, and address sand mining pollution and PFAS contamination. Water supply and drought issues drew extensive testimony. Senator Eldridge and others supported legislation to let the state, through DEP and the drought management task force, impose regional water-use restrictions during droughts and make the task force permanent in statute. Advocates from watershed groups, farms, and environmental organizations said the current town-by-town approach is inconsistent and ineffective, and they described drought impacts on rivers, farms, private wells, and wildfire risk. A related bill on private wells was supported as a way to help homeowners test and remediate contaminated wells, especially in rural areas without public water. The committee also heard testimony on a bill to allow the Lynnfield Water District to join the MWRA, with local officials saying the move would help address PFAS and other contamination and improve supply reliability. Another major panel supported a water infrastructure funding bill, arguing that aging drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater systems need major new investment, including support for PFAS treatment, sewer rate relief, biosolids research, and regional interconnections. Members asked about costs, funding sources, and the relationship to existing revolving loan funds; witnesses said the bill would need to be paired with future bond funding and new revenue ideas. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the chairs repeatedly invited written testimony and noted the large number of speakers.

Transcript Highlights:

• director of research took medical leave, alleging she had experienced inappropriate and harmful behavior
• Currently, the Commonwealth has not conducted a full analysis of the market size or production capacity
• This legislation fills that gap by commissioning an economic analysis of the entire industry, giving
• So, according to a 2024 analysis by Whitney Economics, Massachusetts' 427 licensed cannabis cultivators
• And in a public meeting on March 13th, I witnessed more evasive behavior and aberrant legal assertions

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Cannabis Policy held its first hearing of the 194th session to take public testimony on 21 cannabis-related bills. Chairs Donahue and Gómez outlined hearing procedures and noted that written testimony would also be accepted. Much of the hearing focused on the Cannabis Control Commission (CCC), with Senator Mike Moore urging support for S. 90 to create an inspector general unit within the CCC. He argued the commission has suffered from dysfunction, workplace harassment allegations, delayed governance reforms, missed fee collections, and high legal costs, and said stronger legislative oversight is needed. Committee members largely agreed the CCC needs reform, though some expressed hope that new leadership would improve operations. A major theme was market structure and business viability. Representative Tyler testified for H. 183 to raise adult-use purchase limits from one ounce to two ounces, saying the change would reduce confusion and help retailers compete with neighboring states. Senator Payano supported S. 100, which would require a study of cannabis supply and demand to guide cultivation licensing, warning that oversupply is driving down prices and threatening cultivators. The Massachusetts Cannabis Coalition, represented by Ryan Dominguez, backed a package of bills aimed at increasing revenue, reducing regulatory burdens, attracting investment, and stabilizing the market, including higher purchase limits, simpler badge and testing rules, and a phased increase in the retail license cap. Attorneys Kevin Conroy and Mike Ross also supported raising the cap, arguing that the industry lacks capital and that more investment and exit opportunities are needed for provisional and distressed licensees. The most contentious issue was whether to raise the retail license cap from three to six. Supporters, including several business owners and industry advocates such as Peyton Shubrick, Tito Jackson, Armani White, Sean Burt, and others, said the current cap traps owners in declining businesses, prevents exits, and limits access to capital. They argued that many social equity and economic empowerment operators are struggling, that oversupply has pushed prices down, and that allowing more ownership could help businesses scale or sell. Opponents, including Senator Liz Miranda and several social equity operators, warned that lifting the cap now would let larger operators and multi-state companies dominate the market and harm equity-owned businesses. Miranda’s S. 88 would instead strengthen enforcement of ownership limits through audits, whistleblower protections, an anonymous tip line, and greater transparency. Another major topic was worker and consumer safety: Laura Bruno, Danny Carson, Al Vega, and others supported H. 194 after the death of Lorna McMurray, arguing for a CCC workplace and consumer safety department, better ventilation and PPE standards, stronger testing oversight, and retaliation protections for workers. The hearing ended without votes, with members thanking testifiers and indicating the committee would continue reviewing the bills.

Transcript Highlights:

• We know what to call the behavior of telling people you're icky and unwanted because of who you are.
• to facilitate better motivated Behavior to facilitate better better<04:11:55.920> kind<04:11:
• But we certainly are seeing an increase in hate-motivated behavior and Civil Rights Act violations.
• But we certainly are seeing an increase in hate-motivated behavior and Civil Rights Act violations.
• families schools to address the behavior families schools to address the behavior at<04:24:15.080

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The House Judiciary Committee opened a hearing on House Bill 148, with the chair limiting testimony to two minutes and asking for no outbursts so the committee could get through eight bills that day. Representative Kofalt, the prime sponsor, said HB 148 was the same as last year’s HB 396, which passed both chambers but was vetoed by the governor. He explained the bill would allow, but not require, separation by biological sex in bathrooms, locker rooms, houses of correction, and certain athletic competitions, leaving local school boards and administrators discretion to set policies. He argued the bill was meant to address safety and privacy concerns and cited a Milford incident and concerns in several school districts as examples of why local flexibility was needed. Committee members questioned the lack of a definition of “biological sex” and how the bill would be applied. Kofalt said he did not think a definition was necessary because males and females are generally understood, and he said the bill would give local policymakers latitude to make practical rules. He also said the bill was intended to address situations where people might misuse transgender claims to access spaces inappropriately. In response to questions, he said he was aware of issues in Kearsarge, Milford, and Mascoma school districts and had heard of discomfort in the State House, though he did not know all the details. Several opponents testified that the bill would discriminate against transgender and non-binary people and create enforcement problems. Executive Councilor Karen Hill said the bill would roll back New Hampshire’s anti-discrimination protections and conflict with the state’s Live Free or Die values. Alice Wade, a trans woman, said she had used women’s restrooms without incident and argued the bill would invite invasive enforcement and harassment. Representative La Selig said the bill was discriminatory and that bathroom concerns were being confused with unrelated harassment by cisgender males. Betsy Harrington supported the bill, citing a girls’ soccer game at Kearsarge that she said was disrupted by a boy playing on a girls’ team. Rosie Emer and her child testified against the bill, saying bathroom restrictions would increase anxiety and risk for trans and non-binary children. Stephen Scaer and Wendy Stallings supported the bill, arguing sex is biologically fixed and that excluding males from female spaces should not require genital inspections. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• Please refrain from profanity or uncivil behavior. We'll just keep this civil.
• Part of your analysis? No, no. Did you use that as part of your analysis to kind of benchmark?
• Part of your analysis. No, Stan's Arena. Part of your analysis.
• Did you use that as part of your analysis<00:52:32.800> to<00:52:32.960> kind<00:52:33.040
• analysis to kind of benchmark? Sure. analysis to kind of benchmark? Sure.

Bills: SB2141, SB2593, SB2824, SB2135, SB2115

Keywords: retirement, law enforcement, pension, public safety, employee contributions, Law Enforcement Standards Board, LESB, civil service exemption, collective bargaining exemption, law enforcement certification, police standards, law enforcement training, officer certification, training and curriculum coordinator, lead investigative agent, administrative manager, administrator, Hawaii HRS 76-16, Hawaii HRS 139-3, personnel exemption

Transcript Highlights:

• He had a behavior plan.
• But in addition to learning academic and functional skills, he was able to model appropriate behavior
• of comments they they note that analysis of comments they they note that the<00:26:20.919> intent
• able to model appropriate behavior able to model appropriate behavior language<00:27:02.240>
• plan because that was a pretty behavior plan because that was a pretty uh<00:29:59.720> structured

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The hearing focused on HB 563, which would revise the education funding formula for pupils receiving special education services by replacing the current single special education amount with three differentiated categories. Representative Rick Ladd, the prime sponsor, said the bill largely tracks a House-passed version from the prior session with minor figure adjustments, and explained that the proposal uses projected FY26 amounts for three categories based on time in general education versus more intensive placements. He also noted that the bill does not address catastrophic aid directly, but that special education aid, CAT aid, and proration all remain issues for later work sessions. Ladd and supporters argued that weighted categories better reflect actual costs and are more sustainable than treating all IEPs the same. Representative Margaret Drye said the approach was one of the best ideas from the education funding subcommittee and urged the committee to support differentiated aid. Representative Ames asked how the category amounts were derived, and Ladd said Category A follows the FY26 base, Category B is a higher weight, and Category C is a still higher weight for more intensive services, though he acknowledged the exact multipliers were developed earlier and could be revisited. He also said the committee would continue discussing whether the weights are appropriate and how they interact with CAT aid. Testimony from Bonnie Dunham strongly opposed the bill. She argued that funding based on placement rather than actual service need would create incentives to move students into more restrictive settings, could stigmatize children with labels such as "Category C," and would undermine the least restrictive environment requirements under federal special education law. She described her son’s experience in inclusive settings as beneficial and said the bill would have penalized the district for serving him there. In response to questions, she said schools and parents should base funding on the child’s actual needs and costs, not on placement, and urged the committee to recommend the bill inexpedient to legislate.

Transcript Highlights:

• So I would like to take the behavior down and I think, um, or just the partisanship behavior down and
• So I would like to take the behavior.
• > have the partisanship behavior down and have the partisanship behavior down and have the<00:10:
• You're going to hyperartisan behavior.
• <03:39:25.680> describes, eliminates, as the analysis describes, eliminates, as the analysis

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ,<00:04:37.080> intellectual, medical, behavioral, intellectual, medical, behavioral, intellectual
• <00:47:59.320> Both and behavioral health fund costs.
• Both and behavioral health fund costs.
• the behavioral health fund. the behavioral health fund.
• However, it did not include an analysis for adolescent rates.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Mental health and behavioral health care is also another one.
• And I think part of this is attributable to the lack of coverage we have for mental behavioral health
• >> Madam Chairman, uh, Senator Grums, Wyoming Behavioral Institute.
• Um, it also I think is whether consciously or not a major shaping tool in patient behavior.
• I think it's really hard to change human behavior. We know that.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, this gives us a huge surface area to volume ratio, which changes the behavior in reactions and other
• Um, this gives us a huge surface area to volume ratio, which changes the behavior in reactions and other
• <00:08:23.840> uh<00:08:24.000> in which changes the behavior uh in which changes the
• behavior uh in reactions<00:08:24.960> and<00:08:25.199> and<00:08:25.440> other
• fluid because change the behavior of the fluid because of<00:32:34.000> the<00:32:34.240>

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00 Attendance Roll Call 01:58 Approval of Minutes 03:05 Member Comments 03:18 Nanotechnologies in Energy 06:20, 958, all

Summary: The committee met and approved the minutes, then heard announcements and introductions from members and guests, including an invitation to an East Kentucky trail ride opening and welcomes for new EPIC and Kentucky Coal Association representatives and several constituents. After the opening business, the committee turned to a presentation on nanotechnology and energy applications by Rodney Andrews of the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research. Andrews explained how nanoscale materials behave differently because of their size and surface area, and described uses in consumer products, batteries, solar panels, catalysts, coatings, sensors, and energy storage. Members asked about the relationship between nanomaterials and coal, and Andrews said carbon nanotubes can be made from coal-derived hydrocarbons, which members noted as an opportunity for Kentucky’s coal and manufacturing sectors. He also discussed work on improved solar coatings, more stable perovskites, fuel-processing catalysts, hydrogen storage, renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel, electromagnetic shielding, and conductive yarns and fabrics. The presentation also covered more advanced applications such as thermoelectric textiles, power transmission materials, thermal transport composites for aerospace, nanofluids for cooling, and fusion reactor shielding. In the final discussion, members raised questions about electromagnetic pulse protection and quantum computing; Andrews said the materials discussed could absorb and spread energy and that shielding applications may help with EMPs, while quantum computing remains limited by extremely low operating temperatures. No formal votes were taken beyond approval of the minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:39:37.680> reflect The idea is that these behaviors reflect The idea is that these behaviors
• control behaviors tied to bias. control behaviors tied to bias.
• c> like<00:40:06.080> racism, It's a learned behavior like racism, It's a learned behavior
• beliefs and behaviors towards women. beliefs and behaviors towards women.
• operation of the state-run behavioral operation of the state-run behavioral health<02:25:49.000>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Disruptive and threatening behavior will not be tolerated.
• or unavailable, we're seeing programs destabilize, foster youth lose placements, transportation, behavioral
• I will primarily be discussing analysis conducted by the I will primarily be discussing analysis conducted

Summary: The Assembly Select Committee on Child Care Costs held its third hearing, focused on how transitional kindergarten (TK) fits into California’s mixed-delivery early learning system, with an emphasis on the Central Valley. Opening remarks stressed that TK and child care should complement each other, not compete, and that families need both part-day school-based options and full-day, year-round care. Committee members outlined hearing goals around aligning TK with existing programs, understanding family needs, and examining the economic impact of early learning on workforce participation and local economies. Panelists from the Legislative Analyst’s Office, Every Child California, Early Edge, Children Now, and others described TK’s rapid expansion to all four-year-olds, the growth in enrollment, and related changes to state preschool and after-school programs. Witnesses generally supported TK but warned that its expansion has shifted enrollment away from community-based providers, especially centers and family child care homes, creating financial strain, vacant classrooms, and staffing challenges. They urged stronger partnerships between school districts and community providers, more flexible licensing and facilities support, higher and more uniform reimbursement rates, permanent authority for state preschool to serve two-year-olds, and better compensation and training for educators across settings. Parents and providers testified about the importance of trusted, culturally and linguistically responsive care, the need for infant-toddler and home-based options, and the difficulty of affording child care when TK is not full-day or does not fit family schedules. Several speakers emphasized that many families still face long waits for subsidies and that reimbursement and payment delays threaten provider stability. Public comment echoed these concerns, with providers calling for true cost-of-care rates, more vouchers, support for transportation and nontraditional hours, and protection from insurance and facility costs that can force programs to close. State education officials said California’s UPK system works best when TK, state preschool, Head Start, and community-based providers are treated as a shared system, and noted that planning and implementation grants and local coordination efforts have helped build mixed-delivery partnerships. The hearing ended without formal votes or actions, but committee members indicated they would continue gathering input to inform future policy and budget decisions.

Transcript Highlights:

• I initiated an economic study and contribution analysis program with the New Mexico State University
• This is part of the electronic economic study analysis that was provided for you as a takeaway, but I'm
• So they're one of our biggest partners in this, and obviously our law enforcement and our behavioral
• issues within the criminal justice system that need to be addressed, as well as in homelessness and behavioral

Transcript Highlights:

• Positive behavior points, give them a virtual store that they can go purchase some rewards for being
• And data analysis.
• it's designed to build content knowledge, refine instructional practice to support them and conduct analysis
• page three, we are requesting four million dollars for special education training, and positive behavior

Transcript Highlights:

• the lowest brain engagement, and I quote, consistently underperformed at neutral linguistic and behavioral
• the lowest brain engagement, and I quote, consistently underperformed at neutral linguistic and behavioral
• If students come to believe that they can outsource analysis and reasoning to an algorithm, they lose
• That they can outsource analysis and reasoning to an algorithm, they lose the very habits of questioning

Summary: The Assembly Committee on Higher Education and the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee held an oversight hearing on the California State University’s AI-empowered initiative, including the systemwide rollout of ChatGPT EDU and broader AI integration across CSU campuses. Opening remarks emphasized both the promise of AI for student success, workforce preparation, and access, and the need to address risks such as bias, privacy, misinformation, environmental impacts, and mental health harms. CSU representatives said the initiative grew out of Academic Senate recommendations and a systemwide generative AI committee, and that the goal was to provide equitable access, training, governance, and workforce alignment across the 23-campus system. CSU officials described systemwide contracts for AI tools, the AI Commons training hub, and faculty grant programs supporting AI-related curriculum innovation. They said more than 93,000 ChatGPT EDU accounts had been activated, over 4,300 faculty had taken voluntary training, and $3 million had been awarded to 63 faculty-led projects from more than 400 submissions. San Jose State University highlighted its own AI-focused programs, courses, orientation training, faculty fellows, student ambassadors, and interdisciplinary efforts to build AI literacy and responsible use into instruction and co-curricular programs. CSU also said it was tracking metrics on adoption, academic outcomes, workforce outcomes, and environmental impacts. Faculty, staff, and student representatives welcomed the educational potential of AI but raised concerns about the rollout, saying it had moved quickly and without enough consultation or consistent systemwide policy. They urged stronger protections for academic freedom, intellectual property, privacy, equity, and worker input, and warned about bias, surveillance, job displacement, and the environmental cost of AI. Legislators pressed CSU and OpenAI representatives on training requirements, data privacy, bias reporting, discipline for misuse, liability, sycophancy, and safeguards against harmful uses such as non-consensual imagery or self-harm-related interactions. CSU said interactions in the licensed tool are private, data are not used to train models, and campuses retain their own conduct processes; members also asked CSU to follow up on systemwide training, policy consistency, and additional safeguards.

Transcript Highlights:

• Then, you know, you throw in chronic conditions: diabetes, cardiovascular, behavioral health.
• Neither in most cases has providing behavioral health care, comprehensive burn care, labor and delivery
• And again, the panelists have said government intervention sometimes leads to pretty bad behavior.
• And again, the panelists have said government intervention sometimes leads to pretty bad behavior.
• We’ll see if we can get Pandora back in a box and have more proper behavior out there in this world.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• CURA<00:14:40.720> qualifies Recent analysis from the CURA qualifies Recent analysis from
• . bad behavior.
• criminal behavior are beautiful. criminal behavior are beautiful.
• <03:33:14.520> as characterize such behavior as characterize such behavior as they<03:33:15.760
• ,<03:33:59.000> such<03:33:59.320> as illegal behavior, such as illegal behavior, such

Keywords: 1187, senate, all