Transcript Highlights:

• Unfortunately, we had a Unfortunately, we had a very<00:47:43.120><c> severe</c><00:47:43.520><c> flood
• </c> very severe flood in 2024. very severe flood in 2024.

Bills: HF4094, HF3390, HF3813, HF3583, HF3751, HF4324, HF4789, HF3596, HF4033, HF4424, HF4053

Keywords: Crosby, local sales tax, bonding authority, community projects, voter approval, Owatonna, use tax, special law, community center, municipal finance, capital project, sales and use tax, local option tax, city tax, public facility, general election, bond referendum, debt limit, levy limit, Minnesota local government

Bills: HB3048, HB3259, HB3646, HB3696, HB3780, HB3781, HB3802, HB3818, HB4294, HB4488, HB2929

Keywords: insurance, nonadmitted insurers, surplus lines, insurance regulation, Oklahoma, health insurance, contracting entities, medical providers, enrollment, beneficiary rights, property and casualty, rates, filing, Insurance Commissioner, regulation, property, regulations, actuary, rate filing, independent review

Transcript Highlights:

• with state and federal planning requirements or the adoption of standards related to the National Flood

Bills: S0330, S0354, S0504, S0506, S0526, S0594, S0840

Keywords: firefighter disability, law enforcement disability, correctional officer disability, correctional probation officer, presumptive disability, workers' compensation, line of duty presumption, heart disease presumption, hypertension presumption, tuberculosis presumption, public safety employees, first responders, physical examination, preemployment exam, medical specialist, Medicare reimbursement, employing agency, Florida Statutes 112.18, Florida Statutes 943.13, occupational disease

Summary: The committee took up several bills related to public safety, housing, disaster recovery, construction, and land use. SB 330 clarified the heart disease presumption for firefighters, law enforcement, and correctional officers, aligned the definition of heart disease with medical practice, and allowed a transferring law enforcement officer to rely on a prior physical if the new agency does not provide one. An amendment stating the act serves an important state interest was adopted, and the bill passed unanimously after supportive testimony from law enforcement and fire groups. SB 594 expanded local housing assistance eligibility to residents of mobile home communities, including SHIP rental assistance for lot rent and rehabilitation/emergency repair programs for the home itself; it also passed unanimously after support from manufactured housing advocates. SB 840 revised the hurricane-related land use limits enacted in prior legislation by sunsetting certain temporary restrictions on June 30, 2026, narrowing the affected area from 100 miles to 50 miles from a storm track, and exempting certain planning, water, wastewater, stormwater, and flood-related decisions. The sponsor said the bill was intended to fix unintended consequences of prior hurricane recovery legislation, and the measure was reported favorably on a unanimous vote. SB 526 addressed commercial construction projects by prohibiting “no damages for delay” clauses in public construction contracts, directing the Florida Building Commission to create a uniform commercial permit application, requiring permit fee reductions when private providers are used, and adding mitigation to product approval categories; county representatives raised concerns about implementation and fees, but the bill passed favorably. The committee also approved SB 504 and SB 506, both by Senator Burgess, creating a framework for code inspector body camera use and a related public records exemption for recordings. Both were described as optional for local governments and were reported favorably without opposition. Finally, the committee considered CS/SB 354, a major “blue ribbon projects” bill creating a framework for very large developments that would reserve at least 60% of land for conservation, agriculture, recreation, utilities, and related uses in exchange for streamlined approval and state preemption over local land use controls. The bill drew extensive testimony both for and against, with supporters emphasizing housing supply and land preservation and opponents warning about local control, sprawl, infrastructure costs, and weak conservation protections. Two amendments were adopted to define reserve areas more specifically and address conservation easements, and the committee reported the bill favorably on a divided vote, with Senator Passidomo voting no.

Transcript Highlights:

• . and also greater levels of flooding.
• from that 1% of flood events, that's a good.
• TWA supports planning for drainage and flood.
• risk of flooding for Harris County. residents.
• During that event, we did. not end up flooding.

Bills: HB 1089, HB 1163, HB 1177, HB 1238, HB1318, HB1400, HB1407, HB1532, HJR7, HJR7

Keywords: coastal protection, environmental management, Gulf Coast, storm risk management, funding, Texas General Land Office, healthcare, insurance reform, patient access, insurance regulation, affordable care, health insurance, consumer rights, coverage transparency, claims process, insurance regulations, aggregate production, environmental impact, financial responsibility, reclamation

Transcript Highlights:

• Our members include river authorities, municipalities, all types. water districts, flood irrigation,
• water supply, drainage, flood, and they provide water and wastewater services. to the majority of the
• worth of flood mitigation needs.
• We got over $2 billion worth of flood mitigation projects.
• New water, flood of course, and we have money in the fifth, the flood information fund to. continue to

Bills: HB 1089, HB 1163, HB 1177, HB 1238, HB1318, HB1400, HB1407, HB1532, HJR7, HJR7

Keywords: coastal protection, environmental management, Gulf Coast, storm risk management, funding, Texas General Land Office, healthcare, insurance reform, patient access, insurance regulation, affordable care, health insurance, consumer rights, coverage transparency, claims process, insurance regulations, aggregate production, environmental impact, financial responsibility, reclamation

Bills: HB162, HB376, HB425, SB96, HB426

Keywords: homelessness, homeless individuals, unsheltered, transient, shelter, encampment, street outreach, relocation, displacement, law enforcement, municipal government, county government, local government, interjurisdictional transport, Class A misdemeanor, criminal penalties, public safety, social services, Alabama Code 15-20A-4, environmental regulation

Transcript Highlights:

• The February flooding, the Valentine's Day flood, if you will, for 4860.
• May 16th is how long it took for the last flood buoy on the Ohio River to fall below flood stage.
• </c> 4864 disaster, the April 2nd flooding. 4864 disaster, the April 2nd flooding.
• So, we kept the below flood stage.
• So hazard mitigation Fugat's area.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the prior meeting minutes, and then spent much of the meeting recognizing members of the Falmouth Police Department and related support personnel. Representatives and senators described the department’s response to a May 17, 2025 shooting between two vehicles, saying officers secured the area, apprehended suspects, and prevented further harm within about 30 minutes. They also recognized Officer Jonathan Bis for helping rescue a person from a burning storage facility on May 3, and honored Chaplain Abram Croer and police administrator Marilyn Belure for their support roles. Members praised the officers’ service and presented citations; one member also noted the recent flooding in Falmouth and the strain on local responders. The committee also observed a moment of silence for a firefighter who died after a vehicle crash while responding to a call. The committee then recognized Sergeant Major Jimmy Thorne, USMC (Ret.), with a lengthy citation for his military service and community involvement. The citation highlighted more than three decades of service, including Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia, multiple injuries, exposure to Agent Orange, and numerous decorations such as the Purple Heart and Meritorious Service Medal. Speakers also noted his continued civic work in Williamstown and Grant County. Thorne thanked the committee, said enlisting in the Marine Corps and moving to Kentucky were two of his proudest decisions, and received a committee coin. Members and guests offered additional remarks about his character and service. Finally, Brigadier General Charles Jones and Kentucky Emergency Management Director Eric Gibson gave an update on spring storm response and recovery. They said Kentucky has had three declared disasters and one undeclared event this year, with 113 of 120 counties affected in the last 12 months, including February flooding, April flooding, and May tornadoes; a January ice storm appeal was denied. Gibson emphasized the rising frequency and cost of disasters, citing about $350 million in public assistance over the first 10 years of the period reviewed versus about $2 billion in the last five years. He reported on sheltering, disaster recovery centers, FEMA and SBA assistance, and said about $57 million in individual assistance had been paid and nearly $69 million obligated, while public assistance projects were still moving through review and payment.

Transcript Highlights:

• We had 33 rivers flood, 18 of them exceeding major flood stage. Three rivers set records.
• floods, storms, and other disasters.
• They are mapping fires, and in this case we're mapping floods and looking to do flood assessments.
• They are mapping fires, and in this case we're mapping floods and looking to do flood assessments.
• They are mapping fires, and in this case we're mapping floods and looking to do flood assessments.

Bills: HB2579

Keywords: public media, digital equity, funding, media access, communication technology, 904, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 2579, which would create a Public Media Broadcaster Program and a Digital Equity Program funded by a 20-cent-per-line monthly tax on wireless, VOIP, and landline services. Committee staff explained that 80% of the revenue would go to public media grants and 20% to digital equity grants, with a small administrative set-aside. The prime sponsor, Rep. Chris Stearns, and many supporters argued that public radio, PBS, and community media provide essential local news, emergency alerts, music, education, and community connection, especially as federal support declines. Supporters included public media leaders, community media producers, digital equity advocates, a student, and faith-based and civic representatives, who emphasized access for rural communities, youth training, multilingual outreach, and emergency communications. Opponents from CTIA and Washington Citizens Against Unfair Taxes argued the bill would add a regressive burden to already high wireless taxes and criticized the proposal as another tax increase; CTIA also offered to provide comparative state tax data. The hearing closed without a vote on the bill. The committee then received a cybersecurity briefing from state emergency management and technology officials on critical infrastructure protection. Presenters described Washington’s current layered cybersecurity model across state agencies, the Fusion Center, the Military Department, and local and private partners, and said threats are increasingly sophisticated due to ransomware, supply-chain attacks, zero-day exploits, and AI-enabled phishing. They highlighted the state and local cybersecurity grant program, the need for better real-time threat monitoring and intelligence sharing, and a planned volunteer cyber incident response team under the emergency worker program. Members asked about the most vulnerable sectors, motivations behind attacks, and whether the legislature should act on the proposed shared-intelligence model; officials said the main gap is real-time visibility across participating networks and that the model would require significant future investment, but no immediate legislative request was made. The committee also heard an update on the December 2025 flooding response. Emergency management officials said severe atmospheric rivers caused widespread flooding, landslides, wind damage, power outages, evacuations, rescues, and damage to homes, roads, levees, water systems, and agriculture. They credited mitigation investments, floodplain restoration, and prior state staffing increases for reducing damage, and said state and federal agencies coordinated evacuations, rescues, alerts, and disaster assistance. Officials noted ongoing needs for statewide alerting and evacuation systems, multilingual alerting, search-and-rescue coordination, and more funding for state individual assistance and mitigation. Members asked about a statewide alert system, funding needs, and private losses; staff said a statewide integrated platform would improve coordination but would require ongoing appropriations. Finally, the committee received a wildfire resilience update. Presenters said more than 2.3 million acres burned statewide from 2020 to 2025, with wildfire now treated as a recurring statewide hazard rather than an episodic event. They described roles for Emergency Management, the Insurance Commissioner, Commerce’s energy resilience office, and the Department of Natural Resources in prevention, response, recovery, insurance resilience, grid hardening, and forest management. DNR officials highlighted fuels reduction, firefighter training, interagency coordination, AI-enabled detection cameras, aircraft with LiDAR and infrared, and a common operating picture that shares fire data with local responders. They also discussed a legislature-directed statewide wildfire hazard and risk mapping effort and broader community resilience measures such as home hardening and evacuation planning.

Transcript Highlights:

• we're going to have flooding 101. Ann we're going to have flooding 101.
• . flooding. flooding.
• But also training, disclosing this flood hazard.
• You know, there's nothing I love as a flood professional more than to see a flooded greenway or a flooded
• apply across all hazards, not just flooding.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The first meeting of the Disaster Prevention and Resiliency Task Force focused on the task force’s mission and on recent Kentucky flooding disasters. The co-chairs described the need to better prepare for increasingly frequent and costly natural disasters, including flooding, tornadoes, wildfires, and ice storms, and emphasized coordination among local, state, federal, and interstate partners. The discussion also stressed the importance of budgeting for mitigation, infrastructure resilience, housing, insurance, and recovery planning, with several members sharing personal experiences with disaster impacts in their districts. Kentucky Emergency Management Director Eric Gibson gave the main presentation, responding to questions about the February and April flooding events. He said the February event affected the entire state, with 11,825 individuals registering for assistance and 1,194 public-assistance projects written so far; he also reported 134 households still sheltered, 190 households moved to permanent housing, and three disaster recovery centers still open after a regional consolidation. For the April event, he said 37 counties had individual assistance, 83 counties were still pending public assistance, and no hazard mitigation had yet been declared; 5,893 people had registered for individual assistance, and 144 households were sheltered, with 83 families already moved to permanent solutions. He noted that counties without public assistance would have to cover expenses locally unless state or federal aid is approved. Gibson also outlined Kentucky Emergency Management’s tools and resources, including a 24/7 state operations center and warning point, embedded National Weather Service meteorologists, five regional warehouses stocked with water, MREs, blankets, and kits, a statewide web-based damage reporting system, laundry trailers, generators, a disaster needs hotline that has received 6,972 calls, and a mutual aid system used to deploy resources such as water tankers. He highlighted ongoing work on urban search and rescue, qualification systems for emergency operations personnel, and aerial documentation of storm damage. No votes or formal actions were taken at this meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• We had 33 rivers flood, 18 of them exceeding major flood stage. Three rivers set records.
• driven through in 2021 after that flooding.
• floods, storms, and other disasters.
• They are mapping fires, and in this case we're mapping floods and looking to do flood assessments.
• Once the buildings, they're the hazard map.

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 2579, which would create a Public Media Broadcaster Program and a Digital Equity Program funded by a 20-cent-per-line monthly tax on wireless, prepaid wireless, VoIP, and landline service. Staff explained that 80% of the revenue would support public media grants, 20% would support digital equity grants, and a small share could be used for administration. The prime sponsor, Rep. Chris Stearns, and many public media, community media, and digital equity supporters testified that public radio and television provide emergency alerts, local news, education, training, and community connection, especially in rural and underserved areas, and that federal funding cuts have made state support more urgent. Several witnesses described how public media helped with emergency communications, youth training, Indigenous programming, and access to local information. Opposition came from CTIA and Washington Citizens Against Unfair Taxes. CTIA argued the tax would add to already high wireless taxes in Washington and would be regressive because low-income residents rely heavily on wireless service. Washington Citizens Against Unfair Taxes objected to the bill as another tax increase and said it would worsen affordability. One supporter said an amendment would be offered to address a misunderstanding in the fiscal note. No vote was taken on the bill during the hearing. The committee then received a cybersecurity and critical infrastructure briefing from state emergency management and cybersecurity officials. They described Washington’s layered cybersecurity model, the role of state agencies, the Fusion Center, WOTEC, the National Guard, and the Emergency Management Division, and the growing threat from ransomware, supply-chain attacks, and AI-enabled attacks. Members asked about volunteer cyber response capacity, the most vulnerable sectors, and whether the legislature should fund more real-time threat monitoring and intelligence sharing. Officials said the state is working to establish a volunteer cyber incident response team and that the main gap is real-time monitoring across participating local and private networks. The committee also heard updates on the December 2025 flooding response and wildfire resilience. Emergency management officials reported widespread flooding, landslides, power outages, evacuations, rescues, and infrastructure damage, but said mitigation investments helped prevent worse outcomes. They identified gaps in statewide alerting, search and rescue coordination, and local emergency management capacity, and said a statewide alert system like Oregon’s would require ongoing funding. In the wildfire update, DNR and partner agencies described increasing wildfire risk, the use of aircraft, AI-enabled detection cameras, and common operating pictures, and ongoing work on hazard and risk mapping, community wildfire preparedness, and home hardening. Members asked about predictive technology, sediment removal, and other mitigation tools, and officials said they are working with universities and federal partners to improve prevention and response.

Transcript Highlights:

• ><c> managed</c> Flood Hazard Mitigation Program managed Flood Hazard Mitigation Program managed by<00
• infrastructure and flood hazard mitigation.
• flood infrastructure<00:31:37.560><c> and</c><00:31:37.760><c> flood</c><00:31:38.120><c> hazard</c>
• infrastructure and flood hazard infrastructure and flood hazard mitigation. mitigation. mitigation.
• ><c> within</c> Flood Hazard Mitigation Program within Flood Hazard Mitigation Program within subdivision

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• hazard areas, and of course that comes to the National Flood Insurance Program, which will be insolvent
• That flood may now be our 100-year flood.
• More than 25% of the city falls within a FEMA special flood hazard area, including critical infrastructure
• I would hazard a guess that staff at almost all the approximately 1,300 flood management agencies across
• I would hazard a guess that staff at almost all the approximately 1,300 flood management agencies across

Summary: The committee held an informational hearing on flood risk and flood management in California, with opening remarks emphasizing that flooding is a statewide and growing threat due to climate change, including the possibility of extreme losses in a worst-case event. Members noted recent flooding in places such as San Diego, the Tulare Basin, and Pajaro, and framed the hearing as a way to better understand prevention, response, and how to capture excess water for later use. Jeffrey Mount of PPIC gave the main overview, describing California’s high flood exposure, the different flood types the state faces, and the mix of structural and non-structural tools used to manage them. He stressed that levees, dams, bypasses, land-use planning, flood insurance, and emergency response all matter, but that risk is rising because current standards are based on past hydrology rather than future climate conditions. He also warned that flood management is underfunded, that the National Flood Insurance Program is weak, and that federal support is increasingly uncertain. Members asked about groundwater recharge, permitting, NOAA and federal cuts, and which communities are most at risk; Mount said recharge can help but does not eliminate flood risk, and that small Central Valley communities and heavily developed floodplains are especially concerning. State officials Laura Hollander of the Department of Water Resources and Jane Dolan of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board described the state’s role in forecasting, emergency response, grants, planning, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan. They highlighted aging infrastructure, the need for better coordination, and the state’s special liability in the Central Valley after the Paterno decision. Dolan reviewed the history of major floods and said the plan calls for about $1 billion per year over 30 years to meet current needs, while Hollander said the state works with local and federal partners on preparedness, response, and subventions projects. Both emphasized that floodplain planning, regional coordination, and faster permitting are important, but that more consistent funding is needed. A later panel from local flood agencies and districts reinforced those points, arguing that the state’s annual flood funding is below identified needs and that a proposed statewide flood and dam safety bond was reduced substantially in the broader climate bond package. Witnesses urged more routine maintenance funding, support for regional flood planning, and continued federal-state-local partnerships to reduce risk and maintain eligibility for federal assistance. No formal votes or legislative actions were taken during the informational hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• He has 38 flood controls; 10 of those are high hazards, and that provides $3.6 million in monetary benefits
• He has 38 flood controls; 10 of those are high hazards, and that provides $3.6 million in monetary benefits
• He has 38 flood controls; 10 of those are high hazards, and that provides $3.6 million in monetary benefits
• Is that when we say high hazard?
• Is that when we say high hazard?

Summary: The meeting began with a budget presentation from the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry. Secretary Blaine Arthur and Deputy Commissioner Jan Lee described the agency’s divisions and recent efforts to improve efficiency, including expanded online licensing, electronic veterinary inspection certificates, and a new laboratory information system. They highlighted youth and workforce programs, local food initiatives for schools, market development efforts, and ongoing animal health concerns such as avian influenza, equine herpesvirus, and the threat of New World screwworm. They also discussed staffing, turnover, and uncertainty around federal cooperative agreement funding, while noting they were not requesting new or additional appropriations for the upcoming fiscal year. Members asked about meat inspection staffing, the use of one-time forestry firefighting funds, biosecurity and national security coordination, and agency staffing levels. The department said meat inspection was currently in good shape but dependent on federal funding stability, and explained that prior firefighting dollars had been used for equipment purchases. They also said they work with state and federal partners, including DHS and FBI, on threat preparedness and have reduced turnover by adjusting salaries and maintaining staffing at or below prior levels. The Oklahoma Conservation Commission then presented its budget and program overview. Staff described the agency’s long history and current work in water quality, flood control, soil health, unpaved roads, wetlands, and woody species control, especially eastern red cedar removal. They emphasized data-driven, voluntary conservation practices, citing stream cleanups, flood-control dam benefits, pond cleanouts during drought, and the Cherry-Peach watershed project as examples of programs that improve water resources and reduce wildfire risk. The agency said its workload has grown significantly and requested funding for critical dam repairs, local conservation district staffing, continued unpaved roads work, and expansion of woody species control statewide. Members asked about county matching for road and dam projects, who to contact about flooding roads, sediment removal from pond cleanouts, and the effectiveness of county training programs. Commission staff explained that county in-kind work can count as match, local conservation districts are the first point of contact, and the road training has produced measurable savings and better maintenance practices. They also clarified that “high hazard” dams are those where failure could threaten people or infrastructure downstream, not necessarily dams that are structurally failing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, so one of the programs that provides assistance through this hazard mitigation is flood mitigation
• So mitigation efforts for whatever cause of flooding... and the and the hazardous mitigation and the
• this this hazard mitigation is flood<00:20:09.679><c> mitigation</c><00:20:10.880><c> assistance.
• </c> future flood damage. future flood damage.
• They can also increase secondary hazards and leave areas prone to floods, erosion, and mud flows for

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Public Safety held an informational briefing on hazard mitigation planning and recent tsunami and wildfire threats. Chair Dela Buladi opened by framing the meeting around the need for iterative disaster planning and lessons learned from events such as the Lahaina wildfires, the Puna Coast earthquake/tsunami, and recent wildfire activity. The committee heard first from Hawaii County Civil Defense Administrator Tomage Magno, who explained the federal and local hazard mitigation planning process, including the requirement for an active five-year mitigation plan to qualify for federal disaster funds. He described the plan as a living document built from prior plans, public and agency outreach, risk and capability assessments, and ongoing updates, with county departments, state agencies, and subject matter experts participating in the process. Magno outlined several FEMA-related mitigation funding programs, including flood mitigation assistance, post-fire assistance, pre-disaster mitigation, revolving loan funds, and dam safety grants. He emphasized that the Hawaii County plan was recently approved by FEMA, that the county council approves the plan, and that the county reviews it annually with a formal revision process beginning in the fourth year. Members asked about how the plan tracks project status, how priorities and funding changes are handled, and whether federal funding programs might be affected by HR1; Magno said the county is proceeding on the assumption that funding will remain available and noted some sources have been reestablished. He also said the county encourages council participation in meetings and planning. Department of Transportation Director Ed Sniffen then addressed the committee on DOT’s response to a recent tsunami threat, saying the agency had about four hours to prepare before the first wave arrival and was focused on its own operational response rather than the broader statewide planning process. In response to questions, he stated that FHWA funds cannot be used for evacuation routes, which is why prior legislative funding was important. Members also discussed specific mitigation projects such as fire breaks, bridge retrofits, and the Singing Bridge, with DOT noting that work is underway and that a replacement bridge upstream is being planned to carry traffic during repairs. No votes or formal committee actions were taken during the informational briefing.

Transcript Highlights:

• What do we have in the state flood plan currently is flood hazard areas that were identified by our 15
• The 1% flood hazard area, which we also call the 100-year flood hazard, and some of it is in the 0.02%
• flood hazard area, which we also call the 500-year flood.
• For this flood plan, we had 63 counties with no flood hazard information.
• The model shows you where the flood hazard areas are in that region, including the 1% and 0.2% flood

Keywords: 997, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So we did look at the flood plain area or flood hazard area that is mapped in the planning level map.
• Some of it is in the 1% flood hazard area, which... ...100-year flood hazard, and some of it is in the
• My E.A. mentioned that before this flood plan, we had 63 counties with no flood hazard information.
• We do have flood hazard information now for the entire state.
• That model shows you where the flood hazard area is in that region, including 1% and 0.2% flood zones

Keywords: flooding, emergency response, communication systems, first responders, disaster management, Texas Water Development Board, regional planning, public safety

Summary: The meeting primarily focused on discussions around the recent floods in Texas, specifically addressing emergency preparedness, response coordination, and recovery efforts. Officials from various agencies provided testimonies on the challenges faced during the emergency, including issues with communication systems among first responders. Notably, the need for improved inter-agency communication and technology integration was emphasized, with recommendations for establishing regional communications units for better coordination during disasters. The audience included local government representatives and emergency management partners, who shared insights and experiences from the recent flooding events.

Transcript Highlights:

• These are environmental hazards and public safety hazards to those using our waters.
• or safety hazard environmental hazard or safety hazard and<00:25:33.640><c> it's</c><00:25:33.799><c
• It's also a hazard as a boater.
• It's a hazard. It's terrible.
• It's a hazard. It's terrible.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In the state flood plan, there currently is a flood hazard area that was identified by our 15 regional
• Some of it is in the 1% flood hazard area, which we also call the 100-year flood hazard, and some of
• it is in... ...in the 0.02% flood hazard area, which we also call the 500-year flood.
• My EA mentioned... ...that before this flood plan, we had 63 counties with no flood hazard information
• Now we do have flood hazard information for those areas.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• During this time of the year, we have our flooding season, and so in the past, we've seen a lot of flooding
• That happened with Dixon flooding. And the Black Fire flooding.
• And the current flooding that we are experiencing.
• We cannot prevent flooding.
• Hazardous fuels reduction side.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's flood storage.
• the flood control benefits.
• It was thankfully it was a low hazard dam, but we have so many that are high hazard now. Um.
• And then right up there with a high hazard dam upgrade to meet high hazard criteria is right there with
• response, we also provide assistance for all hazard incidents to include hurricanes, tornadoes, floods

Bills: HB294

Keywords: energy efficiency, tax exemption, residential properties, sustainability, real estate