Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal trigger'

Page 10 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • these three HFCs have facilitated more than... ...thousand units of affordable housing in the last fiscal
  • They'll tell you this is about fiscal responsibility. That is a lie. This is about control.
  • Although there is currently no fiscal note attached to this bill, members should raise. consideration
  • Plan states that, with an almost whopping 30% of the OAG's workforce, quote, eligible to retire by fiscal
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • No revenue has been collected from the fees since fiscal year 2019.
  • The fiscal notes on this bill state there are no fiscal impacts to local governmental entities.
  • So as a result, I would need to hire an additional staff member. which would impose an additional fiscal
  • Additionally, we'd be looking at substantial fiscal impact depending on the size of my investment portfolio
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • How long does it take to complete one of these audits after the fiscal year ends?
  • I looked specifically at where it says the fiscal impact that would be anticipated.
  • So, the local government impact, there would be no significant fiscal impact to units of local government
  • I would suggest that local governments will have significant implications. see fiscal implications up
  • So the fiscal impact... to our community would be absolutely devastating. Thank you.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Local Government (Part II) Mar 31st, 2025

Local Government

NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • And on the fiscal aspects, just so the committee knows, the only fiscal note that was put on this was
  • I will go into the fiscal note. So there is still a fiscal note on this bill.
  • They addressed the fiscal note, which Updated fiscal note would be $54,728 in new general fund costs
  • Would you confirm the fiscal note again? Yes, excuse me. “Fiscal note again?” “Yes, excuse me.
  • Committee Chief Fiscal Analyst Ms.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 14th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • And there's no fiscal note. I noticed that there's no fiscal note.
  • If we're speaking about APRNs specifically, the trend we see from fiscal year to fiscal year is that
  • during that fiscal year about a point. 25.24% of currently licensed APRNs have a disciplinary order.
  • We produce an annual report, and part of that report includes discipline each fiscal year.
  • This bill represents not only a long overdue update to our healthcare laws, but a fiscally responsible
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 14th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • As I said, talking is one of my triggers. I had an episode at that time.
  • There's a fiscal note on there, but that is strictly for staff costs.
  • The fiscal note also states that any costs associated with the bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) Mar 31st, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • managers and public school superintendents receiving significant payouts since the end of the last fiscal
  • Golden parachute, even though the district was facing a major fiscal deficit.
  • Okay, that type of discussion is at least what triggered me to file the bill, because after watching
Summary: The meeting of the Senate Committee on Local Government was marked by significant discussions on multiple bills aimed at enhancing governance and protecting taxpayer interests. Among the notable legislations was SB1951, where Senator Paxton emphasized reforms to reduce erroneous penalty notices imposed by appraisal districts, eliminating the financial incentive for such penalties. The session concluded with public testimonies that highlighted the importance of transparency and accountability in taxpayer dealings. Additionally, Senator Middleton presented SB1504 and SB2237, focusing on the operational frameworks of local authorities and executive severance payments, respectively, both of which sparked considerable debate among committee members.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • thank you guys for considering this bill today because this is going to set the stage for the state's fiscal
  • at all, that's one thing, but if they switched a couple of numbers around and misadded, does that trigger
  • But who knew that a Council on Revenues projection of $26.8 million in conveyance tax revenue for fiscal
  • <02:59:31.880> policy faith in adhering to the fiscal policy faith in adhering to the fiscal
  • Um, what is the fiscal impact of this bill?
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • We were fiscally responsible. We're fiscally prudent.
  • We were fiscally responsible. We're fiscally prudent.
  • We were fiscally responsible. We're fiscally prudent.
  • So, a trigger is not reckless. It's not fiscally irresponsible.
  • So, a trigger is trigger during CO 19. So, a trigger is not<00:28:38.320> reckless.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
Summary: The committee of conference on HB 155 continued discussion of a compromise over business tax relief, small-business filing thresholds, and nursing home funding. Representative Sweeney proposed raising the filing threshold to $400,000 and creating a trigger for future Business Enterprise Tax reductions if business tax revenues produce a $200 million biennial surplus, with the Department of Revenue Administration commissioner able to exclude one-time or non-sustainable funds. Supporters said the proposal would provide a clear policy direction, immediate relief to about 4,500 small and micro businesses, and a future path back to the BET’s original 0.25% rate. Opponents, led by the Senate side, argued the trigger language was premature, better handled in a budget year with more revenue data, and inappropriate to decide in a short conference committee meeting. The Senate also emphasized that the tax policy should not be locked in without a fuller public process, while House members argued the trigger would not take effect until a future biennium and was therefore a prudent way to signal New Hampshire’s direction on taxes. A separate point of discussion involved nursing homes: the House said its report would include $2.5 million for nursing homes with non-lapsing language, and senators stressed the importance of that funding for the health care system and county property taxpayers. One senator warned that triggers could encourage revenue underestimation and noted bond rating concerns about a structural deficit. Several motions were made to accept the Senate position with the $400,000 threshold and related amendments, but the first motion failed on a party-line style split, with the Senate voting yes and the House voting no. A second House motion to accede to the Senate position while also including the nursing home funding, the threshold increase, and the future trigger language was also rejected by the Senate. The meeting ended with the report filed without agreement on the trigger language, and the transcript then notes a separate reconvened committee of conference on HB 751 being postponed until 12:30 the next day.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/24/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • It allows the state treasurer to invest the total amount of monies deposited in the fund in any fiscal
Summary: The Commerce Committee heard and acted on a long series of bills, with several strike-everything amendments. SB 1421, dealing with restrictions on financial institutions, check cashers, and remittances involving undocumented immigrants, drew strong opposition on constitutional and economic grounds and support from the sponsor as a sovereignty measure; the committee rejected a Villegas affordable-housing striker and gave the bill a due pass recommendation. SB 1254, a continuation/cleanup bill for the Industrial Commission of Arizona and its divisions, was explained as mostly renaming and administrative changes and passed unanimously after adopting the chairman’s striker. SB 1515 created a Public Safety Parity Fund for DPS and corrections retention bonuses funded by investment earnings from the Budget Stabilization Fund; law enforcement witnesses supported it as a needed retention tool, while some members objected to using rainy-day fund interest, and it passed on a split vote. SB 1206 updated homeowner protection rules for adjusters and contractors after disasters, limiting certain conduct during loss events and emergency responses, and passed unanimously after amendment. The committee also approved SB 1563, which continues the Barbering and Cosmetology Board and lowers some fee caps, after testimony that the board protects public health and sanitation. SB 1649 established a Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund; a Ripple Labs witness discussed self-custody options for unclaimed crypto, while an Aguilar striker would have required reporting on employers whose workers receive public assistance, but that amendment failed and the underlying bill passed. SB 1290, originally about HOA closed meetings, became a major debate over transparency versus privacy; opponents warned the Carter striker would force disclosure of sensitive member and employee matters, supporters argued HOAs should not take secret action, and the committee adopted both the Aguilar consumer-protection striker and the Carter HOA transparency striker before passing the bill. SB 1670, preempting local contractor licensing and allowing certain journeyman licenses, was amended with a Villegas striker aimed at landlord algorithmic pricing and passed unanimously. The committee continued the Arizona Department of Gaming, Racing, and Boxing/MMA commissions in SB 1671, with the chairman’s amendment narrowing reporting requirements and adding aggregate complaint reporting; the department said it had worked with auditors and supported the bill, which passed. The meeting then moved into SB 1747, beginning discussion of social media application requirements for developers and covered companies, including age verification and parental consent, but the transcript cuts off before further testimony or action on that bill.