Video & Transcript Research : 'electronic voting machine'

Page 10 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 27th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They're voting no straight down the list already.
  • they just vote no for various reasons.
  • I think today's vote is just a vote to make sure that we can keep this conversation going, that we will
  • I know it's a tough vote. And that's what you'd be voting on today.
  • I know it's a tough vote, but I appreciate your time today.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/9/26

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, I'd appreciate your vote.
  • So, I'd appreciate your vote.
  • System by directing DVS to accept electronic signatures and electronic documents.
  • And so, I would recommend a no vote. vote. vote. >> Further<01:16:21.480> discussion.
  • . vote. vote.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Transportation, Highways & Military Affairs Committee, February 26, 2026

Transportation, Highways & Military Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • >> This is a roll call vote for Senate File >> This is a roll call vote for Senate File 58
  • Committee, question on the vote. >> Question being called.
  • <00:54:25.040> on to explain while I'll be in no vote on to explain while I'll be in no vote
  • This was a roll call vote for Senate File 107. Representative Banks voted no.
  • The vote was eight ayes and one no.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Thu Feb 5, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:29:44.880> So machine with that wallet address. So machine with that wallet address.
  • >> Okay, vice chair. >> Okay, voting on HB 1642.
  • Hey vice chair for the vote. Hey vice chair for the vote.
  • >> Uh voting on HB 2198. >> Uh voting on HB 2198.
  • >> Sam, did you vote? No. No. No. >> Sam, did you vote? No. No. No.
Summary: The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on February 5, 2026, and heard testimony on several bills, beginning with HB 227 relating to eviction records. Supporters, including the Public First Law Center and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, argued the bill would help people who prevail in eviction cases avoid long-term housing harm from online court records, while the Public First Law Center said keeping records off eCourt Kokua would not violate the First Amendment because the records would still be available in person. Members discussed access-to-justice concerns, and a witness said legal aid attorneys could still access the records through the attorney-only Jeff’s system and the court’s access-to-justice room. The chair also asked about precedent, and a witness cited a Hawaii Supreme Court case as supporting removal from the online database rather than sealing records entirely. The committee then took up HP 1775 relating to foreclosures, but the transcript only shows in-person opposition comments from the Hawaii State Bar Association Collection Law Section, the Hawaii Credit Union League, and the Hawaii Bankers Association. The credit union and banking groups said they had concerns about broader negative impacts on mortgage lending and other requirements, but no detailed discussion or action was captured before the committee moved on. The next measure, HB 1560 relating to consumer protection, drew support from the Office of Consumer Protection and cryptocurrency companies including Coinflip and America Digital, which said they already use wallet-pinning and other safeguards to prevent fraud. AARP Hawaii did not take a formal position but said the bill addressed a real problem, noting that Hawaii residents, especially in Kona, had lost more than $920,000 in 2024 to cryptocurrency ATM scams and arguing that stronger oversight was needed. The committee also heard HB 1642, which would ban cryptocurrency kiosks. The Office of Consumer Protection supported the ban as the best way to protect consumers from fraud, while Coinflip, Bitcoin Depot, and America Digital opposed it, arguing kiosks provide cash-based access to crypto, especially for unbanked or underbanked consumers, and that targeted regulation would be better than an outright ban. AARP Hawaii took no formal position but strongly emphasized the harm caused by scams, saying victims are often frightened into acting quickly and that kiosk transactions currently lack enough friction or intervention. Finally, HB 1647, also on consumer protection, would impose liability on host businesses that provide space for crypto kiosks. The Office of Consumer Protection warned small businesses might not understand the liability, while Coinflip, Bitcoin Depot, and America Digital opposed the bill, saying it would unfairly shift enforcement duties to host stores and could discourage businesses from hosting kiosks, effectively creating a de facto ban. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Feb 12th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because of these machine gun conversion devices, in 2024 we had two mass shootings where machine gun
  • Chairman, can I make a motion that we take the votes that we thought we were voting on SB31 but put them
  • All right, hearing none, those votes are recorded. The previous votes were recorded.
  • Applies to this, that would be on SB31, which I think we voted on.
  • We've got votes that people told us are going to mark us now.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/02/2026 - Senate Military Affairs and Border Security

Military Affairs and Border Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, good bipartisan—if we get down the governor's desk quickly, I vote aye. I vote aye.
  • So with that, I vote aye.
  • So with that, I vote aye. Four ayes, three noes, and zero not voting.
  • And with that, I vote aye. Members, four ayes, three noes, zero not voting.
  • And with that, I vote aye. Aye. Four ayes, three noes, and zero not voting.
Summary: The Military Affairs and Border Security Committee met and approved the January 26, 2026 minutes, then took up several bills related to veterans, immigration, and border security. SB 1268 was described as an emergency cleanup measure clarifying that a 100% service-connected disabled veteran’s primary residence is fully exempt from property tax, including when jointly owned with a spouse; county assessors supported it as needed to fix ambiguous language before the 2026 tax year, and it passed 7-0. SB 1152 would make people with pending asylum applications eligible for state or local public benefits until asylum is granted; supporters framed it as limiting state spending on pending cases, while opponents argued it was redundant, could encourage racial profiling, and conflicted with humanitarian and economic considerations. It passed 4-3. SB 1156 would appropriate $20 million to reimburse cities, towns, and counties for short-term detention costs involving unauthorized persons; supporters said local governments were bearing an unfair burden, while opponents said the money should go elsewhere and that the state was already spending heavily on border issues. It passed 4-3.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 21st, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill does that, and for that, I will vote yes on this legislation and we'll have. support any other
  • It is in their name that we will vote for Senate Bill 1. Thank you, Mr. President and members.
  • There being 28 ayes and no no votes, Senate Bill 1 has passed in honor of the 27.
Bills: SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, SB 1, HB4, HB4, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, SB1, SB2, SB5
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 2/17/25

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please strip that provision of the bill, or vote no altogether at the very least.
  • Chair, committee members, please vote for humanity and compassion by voting no today.
  • for Humanity and compassion please vote for Humanity and compassion by<00:29:10.080> voting<00
  • That was the last one before we take a vote, folks. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
  • Please vote no on House File 27. Thank you. That was perfect.
Bills: HF10, HF27
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Agriculture & Livestock Mar 18th, 2025

Agriculture & Livestock

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 147 modernizes Texas' livestock... identification system by moving brand registration to an electronic
  • Um, but what we're concerned about is where it talks about identifying. the cattle with electronic devices
  • Bill, are you talking about that requires an electronic device?
  • You can have a electronic device because you You already have, you can already put around their neck
  • like what you do with a dog, a collar with a. tracker in it, but this is talking about other electronic
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means May 19th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill simply requires tax assessors to make electronic payment options available for citizens to
  • Make that motion in a separate item with a separate vote of the taxing entity, so that it's called out
  • by requiring taxpayers to pay $10,000 or more during the preceding fiscal year to file reports electronically
  • If you had a minimum of $10,000 in expenses the previous year, you'd have to use it electronically.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • would be starting on line 218, where they would have to report on a public website or on a public electronic
  • And so last session when this bill passed out of the other committee, there were actually no no votes
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I vote aye.
  • I vote aye.
  • How do you vote? How do you vote? Mr. Chair, just point of order. I vote. How do you vote?
  • So with that, I vote no. So with that, I vote no. I'm sorry, can you say the vote again?
  • I vote aye. I'll reserve my comments to after the vote. I'll just vote aye. But I forgot the vote.
Summary: The committee first heard a lengthy presentation and discussion focused on Arizona State University’s foreign research ties, especially collaborations and funding connected to China and Chinese military-affiliated institutions. The presenter argued that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents had not been transparent about foreign gifts, contracts, and research partnerships, citing federal reporting forms, the Wolf Amendment, export-control concerns, and alleged links to dual-use technologies such as quantum systems, AI, robotics, microelectronics, and biosecurity. A witness from American Global Strategies testified in support, saying the bill would help protect U.S. research security and national security by imposing state-level guardrails on sensitive collaborations. After questions, the committee considered a strike-everything amendment to SB 1060 that would bar public universities from entering into or continuing certain loans, gifts, contracts, research partnerships, or sponsored projects involving the PRC, the CCP, and listed Chinese military-linked universities, require ABOR review and approval, and impose reporting and budget penalties. The amendment was withdrawn, and the committee instead took up SB 1327, which directs ABOR to require university research security policies and to report annually on those policies and on foreign contributions over $250,000; SB 1327 received a 4-2 do-pass recommendation, with Del Santos, Hernandez, and Márquez voting no and Kolodin, Powell, Keshel, and Gillette voting yes. The committee then heard SB 1803, a veterans bill regulating unrecognized persons who assist with VA disability claims. The sponsor and industry witnesses said the bill would protect veterans from bad actors by requiring disclosures, capping fees, banning certain practices, and filing service agreements with the Attorney General, while opponents argued it could restrict consumer choice, resemble a price ceiling, and still allow non-attorneys to engage in the unauthorized practice of law. After extensive debate over contingent fees, legal ethics, and whether the bill was too favorable to one company, the committee continued the hearing with additional testimony and questions.