Video & Transcript : 'driving under the influence' :

Page 10 of 500
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Caucus of the Whole - 2025-03-26 - 1:30PM

Vermont House Floor Meeting

AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Transportation & Infrastructure

Transportation & Infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:
  • or actual physical control while under the influence to request a hearing to determine if the... ...driving
  • or actual physical control while under the influence to request a hearing to determine if the defendant
  • pertaining to driving or actual physical control under the influence home detention program, special
  • Okay, it says revising regulation related to driving under the influence allows a first-time offender
  • or aggravated driving act or actual physical control of the vehicle while under the influence to request
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Louis Park alone, we have experienced two separate impaired driving incidents that resulted in the deaths
  • The opportunity that this bill presents is the potential to stop tragic impaired driving events from
  • Right now, the only people who have alcohol-related driving offenses and are not able to legally drive
  • , the only option for somebody who's committed the most egregious conduct can't legally drive, and so
  • Your support ensures that the roughly 95,000 individuals under some form of supervision in the state
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The opportunity that this bill presents is the potential to stop tragic impaired driving events from
  • The opportunity that this bill presents is the potential to stop tragic impaired driving events from
  • The opportunity that this bill presents is the potential to stop tragic impaired driving events from
  • The deadly consequences are all the same, with statewide data showing us that impaired driving is still
  • The deadly consequences are all the same, with statewide data showing us that impaired driving is still
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Feb 25th, 2026

Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • Speaker: No, it's just on the ones if you choose to drive them on the road.
  • No, it's it's just on the ones if you choose to drive them on the road.
  • ><c> drive</c><00:10:30.160><c> them</c><00:10:30.320><c> on</c><00:10:30.480><c> the</c><00:10:30.640
  • </c><00:10:30.880><c> This</c> choose to drive them on the road.
  • This choose to drive them on the road.
Bills: HB461 , HB465 , HB469 , HB473 , SB94 , SB303 , HB461 , HB465 , HB469 , HB473 , SB94 , SB303
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • I remind you there's a sign-up sheet at the podium by the door. Mr.
  • The responsibility is on the backs of the judges if they want this, like DMV, although we don't call
  • That's the first part of the bill.
  • That's the first part of the bill.
  • ><c> is</c> part of the bill uh the second part is part of the bill uh the second part is similar<00:
Summary: The committee met with a quorum and took up House Bill 662, relating to personally identifiable information. Representative John Blanton explained that the bill would let judges, including federal and state judges, request redaction of their personal and immediate family information from public records, but that the protection would end if they later made identifying information public themselves. He also said the bill would restrict access to certain medical examiner information tied to insurance-company examinations, while still allowing doctors and hospitals access to know who is reviewing the information. The chair noted a committee substitute with a small change on page 3, line 12, removing name and license number language. After discussion, the sponsor agreed to proceed with the substitute. Senator Nemes moved adoption of the committee substitute, seconded by Senator Carroll, and it was adopted without opposition. The committee then voted on the bill itself. Senator Nemes moved passage, Senator Carroll seconded, and the roll was called. House Bill 662 was reported favorably with the expression of opinion that it should pass.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • To the flag of the I pledge allegiance.
  • </c> consideration, the only item on the consideration, the only item on the agenda<00:02:09.280><c>
  • of the House, the Secretary of State, the Office of the Secretary of State, the Kentucky Board of Elections
  • </c> The sub is under consideration. >> Well, I've got a motion and a second.
  • </c> which I think takes the the right of the which I think takes the the right of the voters<00:10:42.640
Summary: The House Elections, Constitutional Amendments, and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee met to consider House Bill 534, sponsored by Rep. DJ Johnson, with a committee substitute. Johnson said the bill was the product of interim work with the Secretary of State’s office, the State Board of Elections, county clerks, KREF, and other stakeholders, and that the committee substitute folded in several election-administration changes. He highlighted provisions clarifying the timeline for felony voter-roll removals, allowing the Board of Elections to work with federal agencies to identify non-citizens on the voter rolls, creating a process for those individuals to prove citizenship and vote provisionally, and changing some KREF board appointments. He also described technical campaign-finance changes and said some provisions might still be adjusted through floor amendments. Members raised concerns about fiscal impact, timing, and voter privacy. Rep. Bivens questioned the cost and whether the bill could affect voter records; Johnson responded that the bill itself did not require new equipment or broad new spending, though a special election in a local government failure scenario could create costs. Rep. Hancock and Rep. Marzian argued the bill could create unnecessary burdens on county clerks and questioned whether there was a demonstrated problem to justify the changes. The county clerks’ association, through Rockcastle County Clerk Danetta Ford Allen, opposed the bill as introduced, warning that citizenship checks could wrongly remove eligible voters, that online ballot images or cast vote records could threaten voter privacy and facilitate vote buying, and that the emergency clause would force major changes too close to the May primary. Johnson defended the bill as a targeted response to a real local election failure and said the citizenship data sharing would be limited to name, date of birth, and Social Security number. He also explained that the ballot-image language was permissive and intended to let counties explore emerging technology, but he was open to removing that section or changing the effective date in a floor amendment. He further said he would consider preserving gubernatorial appointments to KREF with Senate oversight instead of shifting appointments to legislative leaders. After discussion, the committee voted 9-2 with one pass to report the bill out, with several members explaining yes votes as support for moving the bill forward while expecting further cleanup, and no votes citing cost, timing, and voter-access concerns.