Video & Transcript : 'disability penalty' :

Page 10 of 500
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Law & Justice Jan 27th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Law & Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • The civil penalty provides a realistic enforcement tool while remaining civil in nature.
  • does not result in a criminal penalty results in a civil penalty of up to $1,000.
  • If there's another violation within two years, the penalty is up to $2,000.
  • The penalty is up to $2,000.
  • This also adds civil penalties.
Bills: SB6239 , SB6074 , SB5886 , SB6041 , SB6190
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Community Safety Jan 26th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Community Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • will hear together, not right away, but number three and four on the agenda related to the victim penalty
  • House Bill 2430 concerns the crime victim penalty assessment.
  • One way to avoid paying a victim penalty assessment is for individuals to not commit a crime.
  • House Bill 2430 is an act relating to the crime victim penalty assessment. Ah, there we go.
  • We have to recognize that we can't collect a victim penalty assessment from everybody.
Bills: HB2146 , HB2349 , HB2430 , HB2457 , HB2510 , HB2532
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Retirement and Government Resources 2ND REVISED Apr 7th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Retirement and Government Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • We don't feel like a doctor or just a regular physical doctor is qualified to make a PTSD disability.
  • There's been quite an uptick in the number of PTSD disabilities that have been coming across.
  • My one worry is do we have any kind of appeals process before there would be these penalties that are
  • budget, if we could look at what would be the Guardrails to make sure that that's an appropriate penalty
  • I don't believe that LGBTQ is a disability, and so I don't think that we're talking about two things.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/09/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • I want Arizona to be on that leading edge and reduce death and disability.
  • prosthetic or custom orthotic devices, solely on the basis of an insured's actual or perceived disability
  • Madam Chair, members, House Bill 2953 limits the maximum civil penalty...
  • House Bill 2953: “Madam Chair, members, House Bill 2953 limits the maximum civil penalty that the Arizona
  • It also allows the board to issue a civil penalty less than the maximum civil penalty amount and consider
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Health and Public Affairs Feb 6th, 2026 at 05:13 pm

Senate Health & Public Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Ellen Pines, representing the Disability Coalition, I sort of quasi stood up in support last year, but
  • concerns in the context of this bill, because a number of conditions that affect persons with disabilities
  • Medical or disability information. No, it depends.
Bills: SB20 , SB111 , SB211 , SB218 , SB14
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/18/2026 - Senate Education

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • And finally, the materials must be accessible to students with disabilities, including intellectual and
  • developmental disabilities.
  • school district or charter school has violated federal or state law relating to children with disabilities
  • Champions for Kids, a coalition of parents, attorneys, and advocates fighting for students with disabilities
  • Champions for Kids, a coalition of parents, attorneys, and advocates fighting for students with disabilities
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/16/2026 - Senate Finance

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Penalties still apply when taxes are owed, or...
  • ...late penalties work now. Do you feel like you have a relative?
  • There's a $25 penalty. So this just eliminates a $25 penalty, essentially, if they owe nothing?
  • so that you file The penalty is there so that you file.
  • If we remove the penalty, I just don't know when they would file. Yeah, Mr.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary 2ND REVISED Mar 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Courtney Smith Act, which is specifically focused on individuals who are gravely disabled and how
  • We're specifically talking about people who are homeless, who are gravely disabled, and trying to get
  • And what are we talking about in the forms of penalties? What is this economic?
  • So, when we talk about penalty, are we talking about the financial penalty or the penalty In the rating
  • But we just Wanted them to be able to protect their property with no penalty to the owner.
Committee: Senate Judiciary
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - Senate Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Regulatory Affairs and Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • Finally, the bill outlines the applicability of civil penalties for violating the underground facility
  • Failure to meet these requirements can result in enforcement action, including civil penalties of up
  • regulating scrap metal dealers and other related statutes to determine whether the existing civil penalties
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And for military disabled veterans, we offer a 100% free day-use pass.
  • And for disabled veterans, it's 100%. So that's very good. Mr.
  • What level of disability is a current free pass? Mr.
  • a 100% service-connected disability.
  • Being 100% disabled is pretty rare, number one.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 8th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • with intellectual disabilities.
  • Are you personally in favor of the death penalty in any cases?
  • Am I in favor of the death penalty in any cases? I am not. Okay.
  • would be eligible for the death penalty.
  • And members, this bill is not about the death penalty.
Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2777 by Representative Rose, which would bar the death penalty for defendants who can prove by clear and convincing evidence that they had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and active psychotic symptoms at the time of the offense. Rose said the bill would still hold defendants accountable through life without parole, would save money by avoiding lengthy capital litigation, and would address cases where severe mental illness was not adequately considered. Supporters from NAMI Texas, the Catholic bishops, and a forensic psychologist said the bill is narrowly tailored, consistent with neuroscience and moral principles, and would prevent executions of people whose psychosis substantially impaired reality testing. Committee members questioned how the bill interacts with existing competency and insanity law, whether the diagnosis is sufficiently defined, and whether the statute requires active psychosis at the time of the offense. An opponent argued the death penalty should remain available for juries to decide in all cases. The bill was left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 1221 by Representative Lozano, which would raise the cap on pretrial intervention program fees from $500 to $1,200. Lozano and a district attorney witness said the increase is needed because program costs have risen and the fees help make diversion programs self-sustaining, allowing first-time or low-level offenders to complete rehabilitation and potentially obtain expunction. Opponents from the Texas Fair Defense Project argued the higher fee could make diversion unaffordable for indigent defendants and undermine an important alternative to incarceration, especially where related supervision and monitoring costs already add up. Members discussed whether the fee applies only to PTI participants, how payment plans and waivers work, and whether ability to pay should be addressed more explicitly. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 1738 by Representative Jones, which would repeal Penal Code Section 21.06 and related Health and Safety Code references concerning homosexual conduct. Jones said the law is unconstitutional under Lawrence v. Texas, remains harmful on the books, and has led to confusion and unnecessary costs even though it is unenforceable. Supporters said the bill simply removes outdated language and protects civil liberties, while opponents from Texas Values argued the statute still serves as a statement that homosexual conduct is unacceptable and should remain as a warning, even if unenforceable. Members debated whether the law’s remaining language is merely symbolic or still harmful, and whether other criminal statutes already cover conduct such as prostitution, incest, and offenses involving minors. The bill was left pending after testimony.