Transcript Highlights:

• We believe the test should count.
• We can't make students sit for that test.
• We can't make students sit for that test.
• It was developed back in the 50s and 60s when the tests were handwritten and it took six months to test
• That means they have to pass this test.

Summary: The Careers and Workforce Subcommittee heard three bills. HB 919 on nursing education programs would tighten accountability for nursing schools with low NCLEX pass rates by shortening the probation period, requiring remediation plans, mandating free remediation for students who fail, and requiring tuition reimbursement for programs with very low pass rates. The sponsor argued Florida’s nursing pass rates are unacceptably low and that stronger consequences are needed; opponents warned the bill could shut down programs, worsen the nursing shortage, and unfairly target private schools, while supporters said it would protect students and improve outcomes. After debate, the bill was reported favorably by a vote of 18-0. The committee then heard PCS for HB 1261, the “Smart Living Act,” a student-driven proposal from Jefferson High School in Hillsborough County to expand personal financial literacy and practical life-skills instruction in high school. Students and school officials testified that the bill would better prepare graduates for adulthood by covering topics such as budgeting, credit, loans, FAFSA, resumes, interviews, and basic household skills. Members praised the students’ work and the bill’s practical focus, and the PCS was reported favorably 18-0. Finally, the committee considered HB 809, which would exempt school social workers from educator certification requirements for general and subject-area knowledge. Supporters from Lee and Broward counties said the current testing requirement is unrelated to social work, creates financial and recruitment barriers, and has contributed to staffing shortages. Members from both parties supported the measure as a simple way to remove an obstacle to hiring and retaining school social workers. HB 809 was also reported favorably by a vote of 18-0, and the meeting adjourned after all agenda items were completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• IMMEDIATELY IF YOU ARE TESTED.
• HOW WOULD YOU POSSIBLY TEST FOR THAT AND MAKE SURE QUITE WHAT IS THE TESTING PROCEDURE TO TEST FOR THAT
• FOR CANADA'S TESTING.
• TESTS, COGNITIVE TESTS.
• GUILTY OF SOMETHING AND SAYING TAKE MY BLOOD, TEST IT FOR NYQUIL, TESTED FOR THAT MEDICATION AND I'LL

Transcript Highlights:

• After years of symptoms, I was finally tested.
• Earlier testing means fewer years of suffering.
• But no one ever tested me for celiac disease.
• This bill isn't simply about adding one more lab test.
• It's a relatively inexpensive single blood test.

Bills: H5013 , H5087 , H5115 , S2928

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Public Health

Keywords: celiac disease, gluten intolerance, autoimmune disorder, pediatric screening, child health, public health, screening pilot, early detection, 12-year-olds, cholesterol screening, lipid screening, health care providers, Department of Public Health, patient advocacy, family support, Massachusetts, preventive care, diagnostic screening, nutrition, gastroenterology

Transcript Highlights:

• Abe here wants me to get my buck tested for CWD.
• Yet it only requires CWD testing two days out of the entire year.
• Yet only requires CWD testing two days out of the entire year.
• Since more than 1,000 deer tested positive for CWD in Wisconsin...
• Six deer tested positive this fall, and they tested over, like, 400 deer, is what the conservation agent

Committees: House Agriculture , House Agriculture, Food Production and Outdoor Resources

Transcript Highlights:

• Video test for the Rough Rider Room. This is going to be our second test for the day.
• Testing cameras, testing audio, looking at multiple things here.
• Again, this is only a test. Testing one, two, three. There I can see our closed captioning.
• Testing one, two. Once again, there's our quad view. Testing one, two, three, four, five.
• Testing one, two, three. Testing one, two, three.

Summary: This appears to be a technical audio-video test for the Rough Rider Room rather than a legislative meeting. The speaker repeatedly checks microphones, cameras, presentation sources, and closed captioning, cycling through quad view, left view, presenter view, and right view. They note the date and time as Tuesday, April 28, 2026, around 9:20–9:23 a.m., and mention a recess and return to live testing. The main purpose of the session was to verify that equipment was functioning properly and to assess how the content view and captioning appeared to the public. The speaker also performed a finger synchronization test and commented that the closed captioning was word-wrapping in a way they wanted to improve. No bills, testimony, votes, or formal actions were discussed.

Transcript Highlights:

• Video test for the Rough Rider Room. This is going to be our second test for the day.
• Testing cameras, testing audio, looking at multiple things here.
• Again, this is only a test. Testing one, two, three. There I can see our closed captioning.
• This is a test, testing one, two, three. Thank you.
• Testing one, two, three. Testing one, two, three.

Summary: This recording appears to be a technical AV test in the Rough Rider Room rather than a legislative meeting. The speaker repeatedly checks audio, video, camera switching, presentation sources, quad view, and closed captioning, noting the date and time as Tuesday, April 28, 2026, around 9:20–9:23 a.m. They also mention a brief recess and returning live, but no substantive policy, bill, or committee business is discussed. The main purpose of the session is to verify that the room’s equipment is functioning properly and to test how the content view and captioning display to the public. No votes, motions, testimony, or actions on legislation are taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Video test for the Rough Rider Room. This is going to be our second test for the day.
• Testing cameras, testing audio, looking at multiple things here.
• Again, this is only a test. Testing one, two, three. There I can see our closed captioning.
• This is a test, testing one, two, three. Thank you.
• Testing one, two, three. Testing one, two, three.

Summary: This transcript appears to be a technical AV test in the Rough Rider Room rather than a legislative meeting. The speaker repeatedly checks audio, video, camera angles, presentation sources, quad view, and closed captioning, noting the date and time of the test on Tuesday, April 28, 2026. No bills, policy topics, testimony, motions, votes, or other legislative actions are discussed. The only substantive content is confirmation that the system appears to be up and running and that caption formatting is being adjusted for public usability. The speaker also briefly mentions a recess and return to live view during the test, but no formal proceedings or decisions occur.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then generally the topic of testing does come up, and boom, here's all the testing.
• When you go to test something and you send it to a third-party testing facility, is this before you decide
• It's tested per batch.
• There's a batch ID on the testing as well. When they... Was tested.
• They could not field test it because a field test would come up positive for THC.

Committee: House Crime and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm going to open for biomarker testing.
• And so that's the test that we would be adding that would be in the hundreds of additional tests. as
• The tests that genetic types of tests.
• </c> additional tests. additional tests.
• ><c> shown</c><00:31:45.519><c> really</c> biomarker testing have shown really biomarker testing have

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:

• Simple testing could be $200 to $300.
• testing under the ISO-7025 standard.
• The tox lab now only tests to the per se level. They don't do drug testing.
• Now only tests to the per se level. They don't do drug testing after the per se level.
• They do limited testing now, all the tests that are under a 0.08. And they have to testify.

Committee: House Community Safety

Transcript Highlights:

• by the manufacturer and tested by the local regulatory agency, so that we can do this testing in-house
• the testing more frequently because it doesn't cost us hardly anything to do that test in-house once
• need to test more than four times per month, and so that would allow you to test more frequently.
• to test on site.
• change that we're asking for from you to allow us to test in-house.

Committee: House House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee of Reference

Summary: The committee began with a presentation from the Arizona Water Banking Authority on its role storing Colorado River water underground and holding long-term storage credits for CAP municipal and industrial subcontractors, on-river contractors, the Hualapai Tribe, Mojave County Water Authority, and Nevada. Members asked about future firming for CAP subcontractors, recovery constraints, funding sources, and whether the authority could use groundwater withdrawal fee credits for Indian firming and CAP users. The manager explained the authority has no post-2026 firming policy yet for CAP M&I subcontractors, relies mainly on withdrawal fees and ad valorem taxes, and distributes credits on paper through ADWR transfer forms rather than delivering wet water. No action was taken on the presentation. The committee then heard SB 1445, which would allow certain small municipalities to conduct bacteriological testing on site with EPA-approved equipment and originally limited ADEQ sampling requirements to no more than four times per month. The sponsor and the mayor of Kearny argued the bill would reduce costs and travel burdens for rural towns while allowing more frequent testing. Committee discussion focused on whether the change was already possible under existing law and whether the amendment would weaken testing requirements. The Griffin amendment removed the language restricting ADEQ’s sampling frequency. The bill passed as amended on a 6-4 vote. The committee also considered SB 1137, a modernization measure for Arizona’s 811 call-before-you-dig system that sets procedures for large project coordination meetings, positive response communication, and related enforcement. Supporters from Associated General Contractors and an underground utility contractor said the bill reflects stakeholder consensus and would improve safety and efficiency without adding state costs. The Taylor amendment shifted implementation procedures from the Corporation Commission to the One Call Notification Center and made other technical changes. The bill passed unanimously, 10-0. SB 1287, which extends to all active management areas the ability of holders of irrigation grandfathered rights to withdraw up to 10 acre-feet annually for stockwatering or domestic use, also passed 9-1. The committee next approved SB 1335, as amended by a strike-everything amendment tied to the Ag-to-Urban program, allowing a groundwater savings holder to continue irrigating for up to two years after issuance of groundwater savings credits. DWR and irrigation district representatives said the change would address timing problems between relinquishing irrigation rights and finalizing development, while some members objected that it could increase groundwater pumping. The bill passed 5-4. Finally, SB 1336, which continues the State Land Department for four years and adds reporting, planning, and oversight provisions including a new oversight board, passed 5-4 after debate over whether another board was necessary and whether the reauthorization period was long enough. The committee concluded with SB 1677, appropriating $3 million for salt cedar mitigation along the lower Gila River and the Gila-Colorado confluence. Supporters from Audubon Southwest, the City of Buckeye, and local landowners described flood, fire, habitat, and water-supply benefits, while members questioned herbicide use and the need for data. The bill passed 9-0, and the meeting adjourned after all votes were completed.

Transcript Highlights:

• So when we're talking about, like if you test, if you test, So I guess, and I can maybe answer this a
• in the test itself, when you go longer, you run into test fatigue, right?
• And every teacher, every test... When you go longer, you run into test fatigue, right? Yeah.
• This just simply tests to the standards. And it's not an additional test.
• Of a test. But somewhere along the line you said, and then teachers could create another test.

Committee: Joint Education Interim Committee

Transcript Highlights:

• were the NDAs limiting only to test content?
• questions or the right test questions.
• or get ahead of the test materials.
• Field testing, $130,000. There was one that really blew my mind: scoring, test scoring.
• And second of all, why standard setting and looking at test questions, reviewing whether this test is

Committee: House Assembly Committee on Government Operations, Accountability, and Transparency

Transcript Highlights:

• Simple testing could be $200 to $300.
• testing under the ISO-7025 standard.
• The Tox Lab now only tests to the per se level. They don't do drug testing.
• Now they only test to the per se level. They don't do drug testing after the per se level.
• They do limited testing now, all the tests that are under an .08. And they have to testify.

Summary: The committee heard briefings and testimony on several bills, with members repeatedly noting limited time and that some measures were already familiar from prior hearings. Second Substitute Senate Bill 5880 would allow cities and counties to use ISO/IEC-accredited private toxicology labs for blood or breath testing, accept private donations for that purpose, and reimburse the State Patrol for evidence transport costs. Senator Wagoner said the bill is a temporary fix for a major toxicology backlog that delays justice; prosecutors, police chiefs, and the Seattle City Attorney supported it as a way to relieve the backlog, while defense representatives said it would not solve the problem and raised due process concerns about out-of-state labs and access to witnesses. Members discussed possible amendments on in-state/out-of-state labs and litigation logistics, and the bill was set for executive action the following Tuesday. Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5436 would create a gross misdemeanor for willfully or recklessly interfering with access to or from a place of worship or disrupting religious services through obstruction, trespass, repeated calls or electronic communications, or threats. Senator Solomon said the bill responds to rising intolerance and is modeled on protections for health care facilities; supporters from the Anti-Defamation League, Faith Action Network, Jewish and Sikh community organizations described harassment, threats, and security costs at houses of worship. Defense and law enforcement groups raised concerns about overbreadth, possible impacts on peaceful protest, and unintended effects on law enforcement or immigration enforcement, and asked for clarifying amendments. The sponsor said he was open to changes, and the committee indicated it would continue working on the bill before executive action next Tuesday. Second Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5105 would expand child sexual abuse material offenses to cover digitally created or altered obscene depictions, even when the minor is not identifiable, extend the statute of limitations for those felony offenses from three to ten years, and broaden sexual exploitation of a minor to include knowingly causing a minor who is unconscious or unaware to be photographed or part of a live performance. Supporters including the Attorney General’s Office, prosecutors, and sheriffs’ chiefs said the bill is needed to address AI and other technology that can evade current law and to keep pace with rapidly changing digital abuse material. Opponents from the defense bar and the Sentencing Guidelines Commission argued the bill may still be overbroad and raise First Amendment problems under Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, especially where no actual minor is identified. The committee also heard and then quickly acted on other bills: Second Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5268, requiring one year of community custody for unlawful possession of a firearm, was amended and reported out due pass as amended; Engrossed Senate Bill 5272, addressing penalties for violence against referees and school volunteers, was reported out due pass; and Engrossed Senate Bill 5286, concerning reimbursement for costs in cities with state psychiatric hospitals, was also reported out due pass.

Transcript Highlights:

• What year did we test? Was that... I don't think we tested in '21. We did not test in 2020. Okay.
• We did test in 2021.
• What year did we test? Was that, I don't think we tested in 21. We did not test in 2020. Okay.
• We did test in 2021.
• grades on the prior test?

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill requires school districts who currently have a drug testing program for athletics to also test
• School districts who currently have a drug testing program for athletics are also required to test for
• testing.
• It would expand who's tested. It would expand the number of tests.
• And this is, I think, testing for nicotine.

Committee: House Arts, Entertainment, Sports, and Tourism

Transcript Highlights:

• What year did we test? I don't think we tested in '21. We did not test in 2020.
• Okay, did test in 2021? Okay.
• was that i don't think we tested in 21 we did not test in 2020 okay did test in 2021 okay so so would
• grades on the prior test, on the prior assessment.
• grades on the prior test, on the prior assessment.

Summary: The committee received a lengthy Bureau of Legislative Research presentation on Arkansas academic standards, accountability systems, and adequacy requirements. Staff reviewed how state curriculum and standards have evolved from the 1997 Public Education Act through the 2003 Quality Education Act and the 2017 Educational Support and Accountability Act, including required coursework, standards for accreditation, career and technical education, graduation requirements, and recent additions such as computer science, personal finance, firearm safety, and fetal growth and development instruction. Members asked for a chart comparing the major laws and repeals over time, and staff agreed to provide one. The presentation then turned to federal ESSA requirements and Arkansas’s state accountability system. Staff explained Arkansas’s long-term goals for proficiency, English learner progress, and graduation rates, and reported 2025 ATLAS proficiency results, which remained below the 80% goal across student groups. They also reviewed English learner progress, graduation rates, school support and improvement, and equitable access to educators. Data showed gaps by subgroup and by school poverty/minority concentration, with Title I and high-poverty schools more likely to have emergency/provisional teachers and less experienced staff. Members questioned the lack of recent data for some ESSA measures, including equity labs and school index calculations, and asked staff to follow up with the Department of Education. The committee also discussed NAEP results, ACT scores, and teacher quality measures under the state accountability act. Arkansas’s NAEP performance remained below national averages in fourth- and eighth-grade reading and math, and ACT composite scores and benchmark attainment were also reviewed. Members asked for additional information on historical highs and lows, the number of assessments students take by grade, dropout data, and comparisons with other states. No formal votes were taken; the main action was agreement to request additional information from DESE and to schedule department follow-up at a future meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• by the manufacturer and tested by the local regulatory agency, so that we can do this testing in-house
• the testing more frequently because it doesn't cost us hardly anything to do that test in-house once
• need to test more than four times per month, and so that would allow you to test more frequently.
• as often as they think we need to be testing anyway.
• in a laboratory versus being able to test on site... ...on site.

Bills: SB1137 , SB1176 , SB1287 , SB1335 , SB1336 , SB1445 , SB1677

Committees: House Natural Resources, Energy & Water , House House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee of Reference

Keywords: underground utilities, utility locating, dig safe, call before you dig, excavation safety, damage prevention, one-call center, locate request, white lining, large project coordination, buried infrastructure, subsurface utilities, utility marking, locator wire, locator strip, interactive positive response system, landlord duties, apartment community, mobile home park, sewer line

Transcript Highlights:

• I've actually done some research on biomarkers or tests.
• Our team is looking into the evidence of those tests and the volume of the tests.
• . ...There's many tests that are out there available.
• Though the House already passed House Bill 50, providing for opt-out HIV testing as part of an STI testing
• So that may serve as a good test run to see if we need something more.

Bills: HB813 , HB1680 , HB3569 , HB4074 , HB4635 , HB5178 , SB527 , SB1307 , SB1822

Committee: House Insurance

Keywords: autism, health insurance, coverage, medical treatment, health benefit plan, HIV prevention, prescription drug, prior authorization, health benefits, insurance coverage, insurance, contract termination, property and casualty, insurance agents, discrimination, appraiser, umpire, licensing requirements, continuing education, admin penalties

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> nationally and tested? nationally and tested? &gt;&gt; Um,<00:48:47.200><c> no.
• They test on their own, but they wouldn't test on ours.
• </c> standard test that you guys take? standard test that you guys take?
• They have to take a test.
• They have to take a test. endorsement. They have to take a test.

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes and consent calendar, then took up several rule items. For Department of Safety rule 2611, DMV leadership explained the rule had been under development since January but needed to be updated to reflect a new statutory change and to align the rule with RSA 266. Members discussed narrowing the rule to road-safety items rather than automobile inspection provisions, and the department said it would issue a new public notice and hold another hearing. The committee voted to grant a waiver and postpone the item until the October 15, 2026 meeting. The Board of Active Puncture Licensing item 26-47 was postponed one month at the agency’s request so it could incorporate OS feedback, with no waiver needed. The Insurance Department’s claim settlement rule 25-234 and related item 26-78 drew more extensive discussion over waiver language. Committee members objected that the proposed language gave the commissioner broad discretion to set waiver periods without clear criteria, while agency counsel argued the rule already contained standards and that the language allowed temporary waivers. After discussion about consistency, permanency, and the need for clearer documentation, the committee voted to postpone 25-234 with a waiver and to postpone 26-78. Finally, the committee considered Health and Human Services rule 2690, which sets SNAP certification periods for a pilot demonstration authorized by SB 499. Staff explained that federal changes now require the age threshold for the 36-month certification period to be 65 instead of 60, and that the agency had been directed to make the change by August 12. Agency staff said the rule needed to be updated to match federal direction, and members generally agreed. The committee discussed whether the federal citation was sufficient and whether the rule should reference the law change directly, but no final objection was raised in the portion shown.