Transcript Highlights:

• Outside this State House, there's the Thurgood Marshall statue.
• Uh, that's one of several cases that Marshall brought to break down separate but equal, Plessy v.
• Outside this State House, there's the Thurgood Marshall statue.
• Outside this State House, there's the Thurgood Marshall statue.
• Outside this State House, there's the Thurgood Marshall statue.

Keywords: House streaming session for Tuesday, March 31, 2026, 957, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Morning, Fire Marshal.
• Morning, Fire Marshal.
• Morning, Fire Marshal.
• Morning, Fire Marshal.
• Fire Marshal. For the record, I think Fire Marshal.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 94, which would prohibit municipal amendments to the state building code and move New Hampshire toward a more uniform statewide code. Senator McConi and several supporters, including the Josiah Barlo Center for Public Policy, the State Fire Marshal, the Associated General Contractors of New Hampshire, and the New Hampshire Homebuilders Association, argued that local variations create confusion, raise housing costs, and make compliance harder for builders operating in multiple towns. The Fire Marshal said the goal is a single state building and fire code with only limited administrative amendments at the local level, not technical changes, and noted that municipalities could still seek exceptions through the Building Code Review Board if needed. The chair explained that a similar House bill was already moving forward with fire code and administrative amendment language, and members agreed that retaining SB 94 would avoid conflicting bills. The committee then voted to retain SB 94 by roll call, 13-0, with no minority report. The committee then took up Senate Bill 30, which would designate the Virginia opossum as New Hampshire’s state marsupial. Senator Fenton presented the bill as a light-hearted measure inspired by Chesterfield School fourth graders, who had submitted written testimony and supported the idea. Members discussed the bill in a humorous but mostly supportive way, with one member objecting that it trivialized the legislature, while others said it could help engage students in the legislative process. The committee voted ought to pass on SB 30, 11-2, and agreed to place it on consent with no minority report. Later, the committee opened a hearing on Senate Bill 95, concerning youth camp cabins and state fire/building codes. Senator McConi said the bill would exempt new residential cabins in youth recreation camps from sprinkler requirements and allow them to omit electrical, mechanical, or plumbing systems, while requiring any such systems that are present to comply with state code. He said the measure was intended to resolve recurring interpretation problems that have caused expense and uncertainty for camp owners, and he praised work with the Fire Marshal’s office to reach a workable compromise. Representative Schmidt asked about cabin sizes and whether larger cabins with multiple occupants would still be safe; the senator explained that camps typically use counselors, drills, and supervision, and that the people behind him could answer more detailed questions. The transcript cuts off before the hearing concludes or any vote is taken on SB 95.

Transcript Highlights:

• Marshall. Aye. Representative Marshall votes aye. McIntyre. Aye. Representative McIntyre votes aye.
• Representative Marshall votes aye. McIntyre. Aye. Representative McIntyre votes aye.
• Are there further remarks, Representative Marshall?
• Marshal. Representative Marshall votes nay without recommendation. McIntyre.
• Representative Marshall votes nay, do not pass. McIntyre.

Summary: The House Education Committee met in executive session on seven bills, with a brief recognition of students shadowing Representative Steele before moving to bill action. Staff summarized measures dealing with competency-based graduation assessments (HB 2007), school-supplied albuterol and standing orders for asthma or respiratory symptoms (HB 2360), the Washington Local Food for Schools Program (HB 2369), surplus technology hardware for students (HB 2432), privacy protections for Education Ombuds complaint records (HB 2440), military family school enrollment and services (HB 2534), and special education evaluation timelines and parent access to reports (HB 2557). Several proposed amendments were discussed, including multiple null-and-void amendments tied to fiscal notes; most of those were rejected or withdrawn, while a substantive amendment to HB 2360 was adopted and an amendment to HB 2557 was adopted to adjust evaluation-report timing and related procedures. In final action, the committee reported HB 2007, HB 2360 as a substitute bill, HB 2369, HB 2432, HB 2440, substitute HB 2534, and substitute HB 2557 out of committee with due pass recommendations. HB 2007’s null-and-void amendment failed, and the bill passed 19-0. HB 2360’s withdrawn amendment and adopted substitute language led to a 17-2 vote in favor. HB 2369’s null-and-void amendment failed and the bill passed 19-0. HB 2432 passed 16-3, with some members voting no or without recommendation. HB 2440 passed 12-7 after debate over privacy versus transparency. Substitute HB 2534 passed 19-0 after a voice vote. Substitute HB 2557 passed 19-0 after adoption of the timeline amendment and rejection of the null-and-void amendment. Throughout the meeting, supporters emphasized student-centered flexibility, public health access in schools, support for local agriculture, access to surplus technology, privacy for families using the Ombuds Office, smoother transitions for military-connected students, and clearer special education timelines for parents. Opponents or cautious members raised concerns about fiscal impacts, transparency, implementation details, and whether some changes should be handled in fiscal committees rather than policy committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• , a fire chief, a fire marshal employed by a local government or a local appeals board.
• So local officials, along with state fire marshals, can enforce final orders and seek court orders in
• c><00:02:00.640><c> the</c><00:02:00.960><c> state</c><00:02:01.280><c> fire</c><00:02:01.600><c> marshal
• ,</c><00:02:02.159><c> a</c> uh including the state fire marshal, a uh including the state fire marshal
• ><00:02:04.320><c> employed</c><00:02:04.880><c> by</c><00:02:05.200><c> a</c> fire chief, a fire marshal

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Representatives Couture, Marshall, McIntyre, Steele, and Chase are excused. Did you get them all?
• Marshall, McEntire, and Steele. Representative Callan, I'll fix your vote as soon as we get to you.
• Marshall. Excused. Representative Marshall is excused. McEntire. Excused.
• Marshall: Excused. Representative Eslick votes aye. Marshall: Excused.
• Representative Marshall is excused. McEntire: Representative McEntire is excused.

Bills: HB1295, HB2262, HB2551, HB2593, HB2594, HB2636

Keywords: reading instruction, structured literacy, early literacy, dyslexia, phonics, phonological awareness, language comprehension, vocabulary, fluency, oral language, orthographic knowledge, multi-tiered system of supports, MTSS, screening assessments, intervention, reading intervention, elementary education, kindergarten, first grade, second grade

Summary: The House Education Committee briefed and took executive action on several bills. House Bill 1295, relating to comprehensive literacy programs and educator literacy training, was revised through a proposed substitute and several amendments. The substitute updated literacy curriculum alignment requirements, changed educator recertification provisions, restored some prior literacy-related state duties, and added reporting and implementation timelines. After debate over whether the bill should create a mandate for districts, the committee adopted one amendment and then passed the bill 17-0. House Bill 2262 would require high school civics instruction to include cursive signature instruction and related election-signature content. Amendments were adopted to allow culturally or linguistically appropriate signature forms, add historical context about marginalized communities, remove the requirement that students produce a legible cursive signature as a graduation condition, and eliminate State Board monitoring of compliance. The committee passed the bill 14-0. House Bill 2551, allowing certain school districts to sell real property with superintendent authorization, was also passed after members debated whether it was a prudent response to district financial pressures; the final vote was 10-4. House Bill 2593, dealing with school district minimum fund balances and monthly financial reporting to OSPI, was amended to remove a provision allowing withholding of apportionment payments for reporting failures. The substitute shifted the bill toward formal financial monitoring, technical assistance, and reporting requirements, and the committee passed it 11-3. House Bill 2594, establishing state requirements to ensure homeless students have equal access to public education, was amended to remove duplicative OSPI provisions and clarify McKinney-Vento alignment; it passed 14-0. House Bill 2636, creating a JLARC-based review process for public education policy and funding, was amended to keep a null-and-void clause from advancing, and the committee passed the substitute 14-0. The committee then adjourned after announcing a future meeting date.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representatives Couture, Marshall, McIntyre, Steele, and Chase are excused. Did you get them all?
• Marshall, McIntyre, and Steele. And Steele.
• Marshall: excused. Representative Marshall is excused. McIntyre: excused.
• Marshal. Excused. Representative Marshall is excused. McIntyre. Excused.
• The following members excused: Representative Chase, Representative Couture, Representative Marshall,

Summary: The House Education Committee first briefed several bills and amendments before going into caucus, then returned for executive action. House Bill 1295, on comprehensive literacy programs, was amended to require aligned literacy curricula and reporting, with one proposed substitute withdrawn and several amendments debated; the committee rejected amendments that would have added implementation deadlines and reporting, adopted an amendment requiring a 2032 OSPI report on literacy outcomes, and advanced the bill with a do pass recommendation. House Bill 2262, which adds cursive signature instruction to mandatory high school civics and requires election-related reporting on signature mismatches, was amended to recognize culturally specific signatures, include historical context about marginalized communities, remove a graduation-credit condition, and drop State Board monitoring language; the committee rejected a null-and-void amendment and advanced the bill. House Bill 2551, allowing certain school districts to sell real property with superintendent authorization, was debated as a fiscal flexibility measure and passed out of committee on a 10-4 vote. The committee also considered House Bill 2593 on school district fund balances and monthly financial reporting. A proposed substitute shifted the bill away from mandatory minimum fund balances toward formal financial monitoring for districts below required levels, technical assistance from OSPI, and possible withholding of apportionment payments for reporting failures; an amendment removed the withholding provision, and the substitute bill was then advanced with a do pass recommendation. House Bill 2594, establishing state-based protections for homeless students and aligning state requirements with McKinney-Vento, received a technical amendment to avoid duplicative provisions and was reported out unanimously. House Bill 2636, creating a Public Education Performance Operations and Funding Review Commission, was substantially revised into a Public Education Review Advisory Council that would work with JLARC to review education policy requirements and funding; a null-and-void amendment failed, and the committee advanced the substitute bill unanimously. Throughout the meeting, sponsors and members emphasized literacy improvement, student access, district fiscal stability, and reducing or reviewing unfunded mandates. Several members spoke in support of the bills as tools to improve outcomes or provide flexibility, while others raised concerns about mandates, reporting burdens, and the practicality of implementation. Final actions included multiple do pass recommendations, with recorded votes on HB 2551, HB 2593, HB 2594, and HB 2636, and unanimous or near-unanimous support on the other measures after amendment debate.

Transcript Highlights:

• We will start with Andrew Marshall. Good afternoon.
• We will start with Andrew Marshall. Good afternoon.
• We'll start with Andrew Marshall. Good afternoon.
• Andrew Marshall: Thank you.
• Andrew Marshall: ...continuing to page four.

Bills: SB1

Keywords: campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards

Summary: The committee heard a Legislative Budget Board presentation and then testimony from the Department of Public Safety on the Article 5 public safety budget. LBB said DPS’s 2026-27 recommendation totals $3.7 billion, down from the prior base, while FTEs rise by 856.7. Major items included increased funding for driver license services and customer support, new trooper funding and recruit schools, crime lab operations, border security, and reductions tied to one-time facility, vehicle, and aircraft spending. The committee also discussed new riders, including one to lapse unused trooper funds and require reporting after recruit schools. Members focused heavily on driver license operations, questioning why prior staffing increases and a prior efficiency study had not solved long wait times, high call abandonment, and appointment delays. DPS and LBB said the agency receives about 22,000 calls per day, answers only about 9 percent, and is seeking more staff plus technology upgrades such as automation, kiosks, and better online processing. Senators also raised concerns about rural access, REAL ID document requirements, and whether the department should rethink its processes rather than simply add employees. DPS leadership then described needs for the Williamson County training academy, additional troopers, Capitol and Alamo security, border operations, aircraft and vehicle replacement, and regional headquarters in El Paso and San Antonio. Members asked about Operation Lone Star costs, overtime, pursuit safety, border crime, oilfield theft, and sexual assault kit and toxicology backlogs. DPS said border deployments remain focused on criminal threats, that overtime is partly driven by deployments and staffing shortages, and that the sexual assault kit backlog is down to 118 cases with a goal of zero by April. The committee later recessed and began the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission budget presentation, where LBB outlined a $115.1 million recommendation and noted ongoing costs for the AIMS technology project.

Transcript Highlights:

• As a reminder, Second Substitute Senate Bill 5974 concerned sheriffs, police chiefs, marshals, volunteers
• hearing, but as a reminder, it modifies the eligibility requirements for police chief, sheriff, or marshal
• complete the required background investigation for a person seeking appointment as police chief, marshal
• complete the required background investigation for a person seeking appointment as police chief, marshal
• Chief, marshal, or sheriff, rather than requiring an appointing authority to complete the background

Summary: The House Community Safety Committee met on February 24, 2026, for executive action on several bills, with no public hearings. The chair announced that action on Substitute Senate Bill 5067 would be deferred. The committee then considered bills dealing with fabricated depictions of minors and sexual exploitation (SSB 5105), worship-place protections and related civil remedies (SSB 5436), toxicology testing by certified laboratories (SSB 5880), reckless driving and speeding in construction zones (ESB 5890), human trafficking prevention and remedies (SSB 5936), law enforcement leadership and sheriff eligibility/background checks, volunteers, and specially commissioned officers (SSB 5974), and missing persons alerts and law-enforcement search tools (ESSB 6070). Several bills had amendments, including a striking amendment to SSB 5436 and a striking amendment plus multiple amendments to SSB 5974; ESB 5890 also received an amendment lowering the construction-zone threshold to 20 mph over the limit when workers are present. Members generally supported the bills but raised concerns on several measures. On SSB 5436, members discussed balancing protection of worshippers with constitutional protections for peaceful protest and concerns about law enforcement access in emergencies; the committee adopted the striking amendment and then advanced the bill. On SSB 5974, members debated background-check timing, due process, vacancy triggers, and whether election-related requirements for sheriffs were constitutional; some amendments were adopted and others rejected before the bill advanced. On ESSB 6070, members discussed the new Ebony and Purple Alerts, existing alert systems, and concerns about surveillance tools and privacy, with some members supporting the bill “with concerns.” Human trafficking testimony and comments emphasized holding accountable businesses that knowingly facilitate trafficking. Final actions taken included reporting out SSB 5105, SSB 5436 as amended, SSB 5880, ESB 5890 as amended, SSB 5936, SSB 5974 as amended, and ESSB 6070, all with due pass recommendations. The committee also adopted amendments to SSB 5436 and several amendments to SSB 5974, while rejecting others. The chair thanked members and staff, canceled the committee’s next scheduled meeting, and announced this was the committee’s last meeting of 2026 before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• The state fire marshal must also inspect a hospital on average every 18 months.
• The state fire marshal must also inspect a hospital on average every 18 months.
• The state fire marshal must inspect hospitals at least every 18 months, again, so no longer on average
• The state fire marshal must inspect hospitals at least every 18 months, again, so no longer on average
• or is a condition-level violation, the fire marshal may reinspect the hospital.

Bills: HB2540, HB2113

Keywords: emergency medical services, EMT recertification, healthcare, first responders, public health, radiologic technologists, diagnostic imaging, healthcare regulation, professional supervision, state licensing, 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Brian Marshall. I'm the State Fire and Rescue Chief at Cal OES.
• Thank you, Chief Marshall. I know we'll have some questions.
• Chief Marshall, my first questions are going to be for you.
• Chief Marshall, my first questions are going to be for you.
• Chief Marshall, my first questions are going to be for you.

Summary: The committee held an informational hearing on the rising cost and long delivery times for fire apparatus and related equipment, with opening remarks stressing that aging fleets, supply chain problems, and delayed replacements are affecting emergency readiness across California. Cal OES and Cal Fire described statewide procurement challenges, including higher prices, multi-year delivery timelines, two-year encumbrance limits, and the strain on mutual aid when engines remain in service beyond their intended replacement cycles. Cal Fire said it operates 537 engines, with 300 meeting replacement criteria and 243 at least 16 years old, and explained the difference between mandatory contracts and one-time acquisitions. The Department of General Services said vendors have cited labor costs, chassis pricing, and the need for longer production timelines, while also noting that statewide contracts can include nominal price increases but not open-ended price hikes. Local fire chiefs from Santa Barbara County, Los Angeles County, Napa, and Fullerton testified that apparatus prices have risen sharply while delivery times have stretched from under a year to three to five years or more. They described specific examples of engines and ladder trucks costing far more than prior purchases and arriving years later, forcing departments to keep older reserve apparatus in service, spend more on maintenance, and defer other budget priorities. Several witnesses said industry consolidation has reduced competition and contributed to delays and price increases, with Los Angeles County and Fullerton noting they have pursued antitrust complaints and litigation against major manufacturers. Napa also described proprietary parts and software limiting in-house repairs, and Santa Barbara County said a vendor’s unfulfilled delivery promise caused the department to lose its place in line. Members asked about possible solutions, including whether the state should consider manufacturing apparatus itself, whether procurement rules or prototype requirements could be streamlined, whether DGS staffing or contract processes could be accelerated, and whether more stable long-term purchasing commitments would help manufacturers plan production. Witnesses said safety-driven specification changes are necessary but can add time, and that the main bottlenecks are industry capacity, consolidation, and vendor performance. The vice chair raised concerns about how grant funding windows and local matching requirements are affected by multi-year delays, especially for small and rural departments that rely on grants and on used apparatus passed down from larger agencies. No votes were taken; the hearing concluded with committee members indicating interest in possible legislative, regulatory, and antitrust follow-up.

Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Brian Marshall. I'm the State Fire and Rescue Chief at Cal OES.
• Thank you, Chief Marshall. I know we'll have some questions.
• Chief Marshall, my first questions are going to be for you.
• Chief Marshall, my first questions are going to be for you.
• Chief Marshall, my first questions are going to be for you.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Oh, John Marshall is on our list, so yes.
• John Marshall can definitely go into a little bit more detail.
• We will first hear from John Marshall, Devin Tegelberg, and Daisy Hanelora.
• We will first hear from John Marshall, Devin Tegelberg, and Daisy Hanelora.
• Marshall.

Bills: HB2278, HB2325, HB2481, HB2503

Keywords: tourism, promotion areas, state funding, economic development, community engagement, tourism promotion, Washington Tourism Marketing Authority, assessment, self-supported assessment, visitor economy, destination marketing, statewide marketing, lodging, hotels, restaurants, travel services, attractions, recreation, retail, beverage producers

Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 2325, which would create a statewide tourism self-supported assessment program under the Washington Tourism Marketing Authority. Staff explained the bill would let tourism-related businesses vote on and fund a new assessment program, overseen by a ratepayer board, with a new public records exemption for business financial information. The prime sponsor and supporters from State of Washington Tourism, hospitality, breweries, wine, and the Port of Seattle said the bill would provide sustainable, industry-led tourism funding and help Washington compete with other states. Opponents argued it would amount to another tax on businesses and raised concerns about unelected bodies having taxing authority. The hearing on HB 2325 was then closed. The committee then heard House Bill 2481, which would prohibit surveillance-based pricing, surge pricing, and certain electronic shelf label uses in grocery stores, while requiring price transparency and a Commerce study on electronic shelf labels. The sponsor said the bill is intended to stop individualized, data-driven pricing that could charge different customers different amounts for the same item. Labor and consumer advocates supported the bill, saying it would protect shoppers and workers from unfair pricing and confusion. Grocery and retail groups opposed the bill as drafted, warning that the definitions could unintentionally restrict loyalty programs, discounts, inventory management, markdowns, and electronic shelf labels that improve efficiency. Members and the sponsor discussed possible amendments, and the hearing was closed. House Bill 2503, regulating artificial intelligence training data, was then heard. Staff said the bill would require developers of generative AI systems to post high-level documentation about training data, including sources, size, and whether copyrighted or licensed data was used, with violations treated as Consumer Protection Act violations. The sponsor said the bill is meant to provide a basic “ingredients label” for AI and build public trust. Tech industry witnesses generally supported the transparency goal but asked for clearer alignment with California’s law and raised concerns about enforcement and private rights of action. Some other testimony supported stronger enforcement and transparency. The committee closed the hearing on HB 2503 and then opened House Bill 2278, which would remove the July 1, 2027 sunset on the additional $3 per room per night lodging charge in tourism promotion areas. The sponsor said the charge has produced a strong return on investment and supports local tourism promotion; one opponent argued tourism taxes and broader state tax burdens make Washington less attractive to visitors. The hearing on HB 2278 continued with additional testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• of a municipal court, Probation officer, a bailiff or deputy marshal of a municipal court, a marshal
• So why not bailiffs or deputy marshals or school police officers who interact and engage with the same
• Marshals and deputy marshals are city police officers who are already covered under subsection one.
• These school police officers, juvenile probation officers, marshals and deputy marshals, and category
• My name is John Abel, representing the LVPPA, who represent the Las Vegas City Marshals.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So with that, I'll let the subject matter experts speak, starting with Marshall.
• Marshall? Yes. Mr. Marshall, please approach. Good morning, Mr. Chair.
• I was wondering if Marshall could come back. I had a quick question for him. Mr. Marshall?
• Marshall. Thank you. Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. It's on boundaries, or it's on?
• We have been in communication with the Office of the State Fire Marshal.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Marshall? Mr. Chairman, yeah.
• Representative Marshall.
• Representative Marshall? Aye. Representative Marshall? Representative Olson? Representative Rivero?
• Representative Marshall? Aye. Representative Olson? Representative Rivera?
• Representative Marshall, Mr. Chairman, please proceed.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And for the State Fire Marshal, I don’t know if the State Fire Marshal is here, but I’m very curious:
• [02:00:25] Daniel Burland, California State Fire Marshal: Good morning, Chair Bennett, members of the
• So with that, we'll start with the State Fire Marshal. All right.
• Daniel Burland, California State Fire Marshal. First, let me...
• Daniel Burland, California State Fire Marshal. First, let me thank you for hosting us today.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Marshall, Representative Olson, aye. Representative Rivera, aye.
• Representative Marshall? Representative Olson? Aye. Representative Rivera? Aye.
• Representative Marshall? Aye. Representative Marshall? Representative Olson? No.
• Representative Marshall, Representative Olson—thank you. Yes. Representative Marshall?
• Representative Marshall? Representative Olson? I. Representative Rivera? Aye.

Summary: The committee began with brief announcements, including an invitation from Chad Heinrich of the University of Phoenix to an upcoming lunch-and-learn on artificial intelligence and education, and then members and staff exchanged end-of-session धन्यवाद and appreciation. The committee then took up several education-related bills, hearing sponsor presentations, public testimony, and member questions before voting on each measure. SB 1497 would require larger school districts that operate self-insurance programs to obtain quotes for coverage and services at least every four years and to receive certain information from providers in advance. Supporters said the bill would increase competition, transparency, and cost savings for school employee health benefits; it passed 10-0. SB 1711 would direct the State Board of Education and ADE to compile and post age-appropriate resources on preventing and recognizing inappropriate contact, and to make those resources available to schools and families. Supporters framed it as a voluntary, parent-facing safety tool, while opponents argued it should include stronger evidence-based and trauma-informed requirements; it passed 7-3. SB 1798 would create a FAFSA awareness program recognizing schools that designate a FAFSA point person and promote financial aid completion. Supporters said it would help students access postsecondary funding, especially given Arizona’s low FAFSA completion rate and unclaimed federal aid; it passed 8-2. SB 1143 would require schools and districts to submit federal civil rights data to ADE and would require ADE to publish an annual school safety report. Supporters said it would improve transparency for parents, while opponents called it duplicative and raised privacy and scope concerns; it passed 7-3. SB 1684, as amended, would create a private cause of action against public schools for serious physical injury caused by bullying after a prior report and school negligence, with an amendment limiting the claim to bullying on school property or at school events and requiring written reports. The committee adopted the amendment and then passed the bill 6-3, after debate over litigation risk, school discipline, and whether the bill should also cover private schools. The committee also passed SB 1754, which would require ADE’s special education division to help complete incomplete complaints, post redacted complaint reports, and adopt related procedures; members emphasized transparency and privacy protections, and the bill passed 9-0 after an amendment extending the posting timeline and clarifying report contents. SB 1423, continuing the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education until 2036, passed 8-1, with one member objecting to the long sunset extension. Finally, SB 1763, dealing with school district “additional monies” funds and financial reporting, was discussed with an amendment to remove unemployment-compensation transfers and require board approval for expenditures, but the transcript cuts off before the final vote on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• So next up, we have the privilege of having the Director of State Fire Marshal, Joanne Rice.
• We have the privilege of having the Director of State Fire Marshal, Joanne Rice.
• This is something that is reasonably new to the Division of State Fire Marshal.
• This is something that is reasonably new to the Division of State Fire Marshal.
• We've got about $194 million that have run through the Division of State Fire Marshal.

Summary: The subcommittee heard presentations from the Department of Financial Services and the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, then returned to its ongoing budget workshop with the Department of Management Services. DFS’s Division of Risk Management described its role as the state self-insurance fund, covering about 200,000 employees and 27,000 vehicles, paying roughly $150 million in claims last year, and managing a pilot ETS treatment program for veterans and first responders that had 49 patients and 804 treatments as of the latest report. The Division of State Fire Marshal outlined its fire prevention, training, emergency response, and grant programs, including hurricane deployments, the Florida State Fire College, and several capital and grant requests for roof, courtyard, memorial, and equipment needs. The Division of Rehabilitation and Liquidation explained how it handles insolvent insurers under Chapter 631, currently administering 14 estates with $1.2 billion in assets and $3.7 billion in liabilities, and said no new receiverships had been opened since February 2023. Members asked about grant backlogs, fire truck procurement delays, memorial repairs, and whether affiliate transfers were occurring in insurer liquidations. Secretary Griffin then updated the committee on DBPR’s implementation of House Bill 1021 on community associations. He said the department had used the new authority to expand education, complaint handling, and ombudsman services, including 10 free standardized courses, a new condo website, and a four-hour board certification course that had already drawn more than 12,000 attendees. He reported that outreach to condominium communities had increased by more than 60%, that complaint filings were up 39% while jurisdictional dismissals dropped to 11%, and that about 81% to 82% of the 65 new positions had been filled. Members pressed him on whether the department had enough authority and funding, how condominium counts are determined, how self-reported structural integrity reserve study data is verified, and whether more public-facing complaint tracking and better reporting from local governments or developers would improve the system. The committee then resumed questioning Secretary Allende of DMS about outstanding budget and operations issues. Members focused on the delayed People First contract extension required by statute, with the secretary saying the delay involved technical and contractual complexity in moving a legacy hard-coded system to the cloud. They also revisited the state data team and data catalog project, asking why a statutory 2022 deadline had not been met, how the four-person team and broader data staff were organized, how many applicants were considered for key positions, and what each role was doing. The secretary said the catalog work was being simplified into six metadata fields and supported by a broader community of practice, but no firm completion date was given during the exchange.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Marshall, you're recognized. Mr.
• Marshall, please move your bill now as amended. Mr.
• Lydia Hernandez, Callad, and Peña Marshall, how do you vote?
• President Lopez, Marshall, Mathis, from DeLezza, Hernandez, and Delos Santos.
• Marshall, Weninger, how do you vote?

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chiefs and marshals have several eligibility criteria for appointment, including having a high school
• This bill adds eligibility requirements for becoming a chief or marshal.
• And finally, this bill makes changes to the background investigation process for chiefs, marshals, and
• Chiefs, marshals, and sheriffs. Additional details can be found in the bill report.
• It strengthens requirements and provides consistency for all sheriffs, police chiefs, and town marshals

Bills: SB5865, SB5880, SB5912, SB5855, SB6011, SB6009, SB5868, SB5974

Keywords: garnishment, debt, form standardization, financial protection, legal processes, toxicology testing, laboratories, accreditation, public health, standards, indigent defense, task force, criminal justice, legal aid, public defense, face coverings, law enforcement, public safety, civil liberties, court security

Summary: The committee first took executive action on several bills. On SB 5865, concerning garnishment forms, Amendment Alpha was adopted to require the Washington Pattern Forms Committee to complete the new forms by December 31, 2026, with the act taking effect January 1, 2027; Amendment Bravo was withdrawn. The bill then received a due pass recommendation. On SB 5880, concerning toxicology testing by certified or accredited laboratories, Amendment Charlie was adopted to clarify that local governments are not required to fund the testing option and may accept private donations to help support it; the bill also received a due pass recommendation. On SB 5912, reinstating the Indigent Defense Task Force, Amendment Delta was adopted to remove legislators from the task force, add members, revise duties and reporting, and make related changes; the bill was sent forward with a due pass recommendation. On SB 5855, concerning face coverings by law enforcement officers, the committee considered multiple amendments to the proposed substitute, but none were adopted; the proposed substitute itself was adopted and the bill received a due pass recommendation. Members then debated the bill extensively, with supporters emphasizing transparency and public trust and opponents arguing it could endanger officers and raise constitutional and fiscal concerns. The committee then held public hearings on several judicial administration bills. SB 6011 would extend Court of Appeals bailiffs’ authority to conduct threat assessments for Court of Appeals judges and staff, similar to authority already granted to Supreme Court bailiffs; the Acting Chief Judge for Division I testified in support, citing increased threats and the need for internal security, and no one testified in opposition during the hearing. SB 6009 would make permanent direct-review provisions for certain administrative and land-use decisions that are currently set to sunset; staff and Judge Bowman explained that the bill would preserve an expedited review process that has worked well and saves resources, and there was no opposition testimony in the hearing. SB 5868 would add one Superior Court judge each in Skagit and Yakima counties; court officials and county representatives described significant caseload growth, trial delays, and backlogs, while the bill sponsor said more judges are needed to address court bottlenecks. Public testimony was strongly supportive, and no vote was taken during the hearing. Finally, the committee heard SB 5974, which would add eligibility and background-check requirements for sheriffs, police chiefs, and town marshals, restrict certain uses of volunteers and youth cadets, limit specially commissioned officers, and clarify sheriffs’ duties to uphold the constitutions and laws. Supporters, including immigrant-rights, faith, gun-safety, and survivor advocacy groups, said the bill would improve accountability, consistency, and public trust in law enforcement leadership. Opponents, including several sheriffs, the sheriffs’ association, cities, and counties, argued it would undermine local control and voter choice, create costly background-check requirements, and potentially overreach into election and staffing decisions. No executive action was taken on SB 5974 before the committee adjourned.