Bills: SB3253, SB3154, SB3254

Keywords: conservation, endangered species, wildlife preservation, native birds, biodiversity, sanctuary, nonprofit, DLNR, agricultural district, land use, chapter 195D, chapter 205, chapter 42F, state funding, public purpose, habitat restoration, predator-free sanctuary, ecosystem restoration, Zealandia, wildlife refuge

Summary: The committee on Energy and Environmental Protection heard a long series of resolutions focused largely on waste reduction, energy planning, and environmental protection. Early measures included HR 12/HCR 10 on a permanent landfill host benefits program for Honolulu, HCR 148/HCR 157 on a demolition waste reduction working group, and HR 184/HCR 194 on a mattress stewardship program working group. Testimony on these waste-related measures was generally supportive from environmental groups and some individuals, while the Department of Health supported the mattress stewardship proposal. The Department of Health also commented that a proposed study on recyclable/biodegradable/compostable labeling was very broad and would require additional resources to carry out effectively. The committee then took up several energy-related resolutions. HR 192/HCR 202 would create a task force on Hawaii’s future energy pathways, and HR 194/HCR 204 would ask the Public Utilities Commission to conduct a comprehensive analysis of cost reductions and financial risk. The Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, the Hawaii State Energy Office, and the PUC offered support or comments on these measures, with environmental and industry groups also submitting testimony. Members questioned the Energy Office and PUC at length about errors in prior analyses, competitive bidding, and whether utility proposals could proceed through waiver processes; the PUC said any proposal would still be reviewed and that it generally prefers competitive bidding, while the Energy Office said some issues were being characterized differently and would follow up on waiver standards. Additional measures addressed data centers, liquefied natural gas, and utility oversight. HR 196/HCR 206 would convene a working group on the impacts of large data centers, and HR 197/HCR 207 would require conditions before the PUC approves LNG-related costs; testimony on LNG was split, with supporters urging caution and opponents arguing LNG should not be pursued. HR 193/HCR 2003 sought a written status update on implementation of the Hawaii Electric Reliability Administrator, and HR 191/HCR 201 and HR 33/HCR 33 dealt with sewage and wastewater issues, both drawing support from environmental and community groups. The committee also heard strong support for HR 141/HCR 149 on Red Hill remediation meetings and HR 190/HCR 200 on reassessing military PFAS cleanup decisions; the Board of Water Supply testified in support and described ongoing PFAS testing and concerns beyond Red Hill. The transcript ends as the committee moved into decision-making, with the chair indicating a recommendation to pass HR 12/HCR 10.

Transcript Highlights:

• :45:06.560> to<00:45:06.720> OPSD,<00:45:08.000> I'll<00:45:09.040> flip<
• <00:45:09.680> you<00:45:09.839> guys<00:45:10.079> up<00:45:11.119> as<00
• Okay.<00:45:13.520> Uh,<00:45:13.760> that's<00:45:14.000> everyone<00:45:14.240
• <00:45:15.200> Is<00:45:15.280> there<00:45:15.440> anyone<00:45:15.599>
• Thank you everyone.<00:45:25.200> Let's<00:45:25.440> move<00:45:25.520> on<00:45

Bills: SB2606, SB3253, SB237, SB3252, SB1178, SB2322, SB2019, SB3043, SB3014, SB2972, SB1190, SB2488

Keywords: wildlife sanctuary, environmental conservation, Hawaii, nonprofit corporation, freshwater preservation, community stewardship, biodiversity, ecological heritage, conservation, endangered species, wildlife preservation, native birds, sanctuary, nonprofit, DLNR, agricultural district, land use, chapter 195D, chapter 205, chapter 42F

Summary: The committees heard testimony on several measures related to wildlife, conservation, shoreline adaptation, and climate governance. On SB 2606, which would establish the Freshwater State Recreational Area Wildlife Sanctuary Corporation, the Department of Land and Natural Resources said it had concerns about employee eligibility and was not yet prepared to comment further on the bill’s ramifications. After testimony ended, a senator asked DLNR to follow up with more detail, and the department said it would relay the questions to leadership and respond later. No vote was taken on the measure during the excerpt. On SB 3253, which would create the Hawaii Conservation Sanctuary as a nonprofit entity to work with DLNR, the department said it supported the bill. In discussion, DLNR said Hawaii has not done anything like this before, described a similar model in New Zealand, and estimated that developing such a sanctuary could cost millions of dollars. Members also discussed whether the concept would fit with existing efforts such as Hakalau, and DLNR said the bill could apply to private or state lands depending on the site. No action was taken. The most extensive discussion was on SB 237, which would expand state and county authority to develop adaptation pathways for relocating infrastructure away from sea level rise and coastal flooding areas. DLNR supported the bill, saying it prioritizes public trust resources over economic development or private property. The Kahana Bay Steering Committee and the Shoreline Preservation Coalition opposed the measure, arguing it was too focused on managed retreat and should include a broader range of shoreline responses, such as erosion mitigation, groins, sand nourishment, and other interim protections. The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development said it appreciated the bill’s intent but wanted broader language that would allow more tools in the toolbox. Members debated whether retreat is inevitable, whether different shorelines require different approaches, and whether the bill should be more flexible. No vote was taken. The final measure discussed was SB 3252, which would amend the powers and duties of the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission, create a coordinator position, and appropriate funds. The commission’s coordinator testified in support, while OPSD opposed the bill, saying it would remove the two cabinet-level co-chair positions, raise accountability concerns, and duplicate some of OPSD’s functions. In questioning, members debated whether the current commission structure has been effective, who would appoint or confirm the coordinator, and whether the bill would improve transparency and implementation. OPSD said it supported more statewide interdepartmental funding for climate planning and staffing, but had concerns about the proposed governance changes. No vote or final action was taken in the excerpt.

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00 Roll Call: 02:16 SB 324 Discussion: 03:01 SB 324 Vote: 14:56 HB 333 Discussion: 18:23 HB 333 Vote: 21:40 SB 249 Discussion: 23:45 SB 249 Vote: 26:16, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:45:01.680> is<00:45:01.800> what<00:45:02.040> our<00:45:02.240> Peter
• 08.440> what<00:45:08.560> it's<00:45:08.680> going<00:45:08.800> to<00:45
• :09.880> you<00:45:09.960> know,<00:45:10.480> I<00:45:10.560> want<00:45
• <00:45:12.080> to<00:45:12.160> do<00:45:12.360> everything<00:45:12.680>
• I know<00:45:13.160> Senator<00:45:13.520> Wheeler's<00:45:13.720> filed<00:45:14.040

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:38 SB 213 Discussion 00:01:23 SB 213 Roll Call Vote 00:20:45 SB 8 Discussion 00:26:23 SB 8 Roll Call Vote 00:58:16, 958, all

Summary: The committee met with a quorum, approved the prior minutes, and first heard Senate Bill 213 from Senator Phillip Wheeler. He described the bill as a response to rising electric bills, especially in Eastern Kentucky, and said it would give the Public Service Commission more tools to push utilities toward least-cost planning, require stronger integrated resource plans, and address utility service territories, utility sales, and generation contracts. He argued that monopoly service territories are privileges granted by the Commonwealth, not irrevocable rights, and said the bill would help prevent ratepayers from bearing the cost of poor utility decisions or sale premiums. He also said the bill would allow large new loads, such as data centers, to choose alternative power sources in certain areas to encourage economic development. Members asked questions about how the bill would work, especially the section stating that service territory rights belong to the Commonwealth and the provision dealing with utility sale premiums. Senator Wheeler explained that if a utility is sold at a premium, that premium should not simply be passed on to customers, and he said the bill aims to reduce costs for ratepayers and create more competition. Several members spoke in support of the bill’s goals while noting the complexity of utility regulation. Senator West said some companies had not been responsive to concerns about rates, Senator Williams said he would pass but wanted utilities to have enough generation to serve Kentucky users, and Chair Smith said the bill was a smart approach within the legislature’s limited authority. The committee then voted to report Senate Bill 213 favorably with the expression that the same shall pass. The committee then took up Senate Bill 8 from Senator Brandon Smith, which would modernize the Public Service Commission. He said the bill and committee substitute were intended to help the PSC handle increasingly complex utility regulation, infrastructure investment, and rate cases by expanding the commission from three to five members, with three gubernatorial appointees and two appointed by the Auditor of Public Accounts. He also said the bill would adjust the threshold for PSC review of electric transmission construction from one mile to five miles, to reduce delays while preserving oversight of major projects, and would update appointment terms and other language in the substitute. Smith said the changes were meant to improve staffing and expertise at the PSC and speed transmission buildout. The discussion was still underway when the transcript ended, and no final vote on Senate Bill 8 appears in the provided excerpt.

Keywords: 00:00 – Introduction 00:45 – Attendance Roll Call 02:09 – House Bill 216 03:15 – Roll Call Vote 04:06 – Senate Bill 122 05:42 – Roll Call Vote 08:43 – House Bill 391 17:25 – Roll Call Vote, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture met with a quorum and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call. The committee first considered House Bill 216, which would correct a conflict created when an office was moved into the Department of Agriculture by restoring grant and loan eligibility for Department of Agriculture employees while keeping the prohibition in place for employees of the office of policy. The bill was approved unanimously and sent on to the Senate floor. The committee then revisited Senate Bill 122 after concerns from the prior meeting. Members adopted a committee substitute that clarified local governments may regulate the covered businesses but not ban them outright, and that fines and fees go back to the local authorities doing the regulating. During final consideration, Senator Deneen, Senator Reed, and Senator Richardson voted no, citing concerns about enforcement, inspection, and potential bad actors, while Senator Webb supported the bill as a needed regulatory scheme. The motion passed and the bill advanced. House Bill 391, dealing with Kentucky honey production, was also approved. Representative Jason Nemes and industry witnesses said the bill would raise the threshold for requiring a certified honey house from 150 gallons to 500 gallons, add language requiring “pure and unadulterated” Kentucky-produced honey, and support local beekeepers without creating additional public health risk. Members discussed whether the limit should be removed entirely, the cost of honey houses, and concerns about imported or adulterated honey. The committee passed the bill to the Senate floor. Senator Yates later registered a no vote on Senate Bill 122 and yes votes on House Bill 216 and Senate Bill 171, though Senate Bill 171 was passed over for further work and not heard that day.

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIZJET2-_FM, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Roll Call - 00:14 Social Workers Testimony - 00:55 Questions/Comments - 07:45, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8By7zlkBhA, 2026-07-02T01:22:45+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, House Agenda for Decision Making: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_HET_03-20-23_.PDF, 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg39EO4C2Kw, 2026-07-02T01:22:52+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, House Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CAI_03-20-24_.PDF Followed by 10:30 AM Agenda: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/Session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CAI_03-20-24_2_.PDF 13:22 - Introduction (CAI 10:00 AM) 13:36 - SB 2710 SD2 16:08 - SB 3312 SD1 19:09 - Decision Making (CAI 10:00 AM) --------- 43:25 - Introduction (CAI 10:30 AM) 43:45 - HCR 96 / HR 80 45:05 - HCR 180 / HR 160 50:06 - HCR 36 / HR 25 1:26:21 - Decision Making (CAI 10:30 AM), 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY4jiM-_G3g, 2026-07-02T01:23:16+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 04:41 - GM 532 47:30 - GM 597 3:17:01 - GM 596 3:54:21 - DM HRE 1:00 PM 3:54:58 - DM HRE 1:45 PM 3:56:51 - DM HRE 3:00 PM Hearing Notices: HRE 1:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_HRE_02-27-24_.PDF HRE 1:45 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_HRE_02-27-24-1_.PDF HRE 3:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_HRE_02-27-24-2_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grU6phmcN9w, 2026-07-02T01:23:14+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:47 - SB 2392 53:52 - DM JDC 9:30 AM 58:51 - SB 3274 01:08:22 - DM JDC 9:45 AM 01:10:02 - SB 2381 01:41:25 - DM JDC 10:00 AM Hearing Notices: JDC 9:30 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_JDC_02-06-24-1_.pdf JDC 9:45 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_JDC_02-06-24-2_.pdf JDC 10:00 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_JDC_02-06-24_.pdf, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKKBJBTYw9k, 2026-07-02T01:23:09+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 Start 00:47 SCR 126 18:25 DM EET-LBT 1:00 PM 20:12 EET 1:05 PM 20:45 SCR 22 / SR 17 28:00 SCR 74 31:41 SCR 77 36:02 SCR 82 / SR 73 45:05 SCR 177 / SR 121 54:26 DM EET 1:05 PM Hearing Notices: EET-LBT 1:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EET-LBT_03-28-23_.PDF EET 1:05 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EET_03-28-23_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QedeAqJrxE, 2026-07-02T01:23:04+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:20 - DM GVO DEFER 3:00 PM 04:00 - SB 306 08:36 - SB 387 10:28 - SB 349 10:45 - SB 509 16:37 - SB 613 17:20 - SB 699 20:54 - SB 720 28:25 - SB 749 34:45 - DM GVO 3:15 PM Hearing Notices: GVO DEFER 3:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_GVO_02-02-23_DEFER_.pdf GVO 3:15 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_GVO_02-02-23_.pdf, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWSEMIpgKgQ, 2026-07-02T01:23:15+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 0:00 - Start 2:19 - SB2020 7:22 - SB2103 11:01 - SB2109 19:25 - SB2127 22:12- SB2454 22:58 - SB2606 28:25 - DM EET-CPN DEFER 9:45 AM 34:04 - DM CPN-EET DEFER 9:46 AM 38:46 - DM CPN DEFER 9:35 AM 45:12 - DM CPN DEFER 10:00 AM 1:02:00 - SB2607 1:22:05 - SB2631 1:23:02 - SB2664 1:38:56 - DM CPN 9:30 AM Hearing Notices: CPN 9:30 AM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPN_02-14-24_.PDF CPN DEFER 9:35 AM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPN_02-14-24_DEFER_.PDF EET-CPN DEFER 9:45 AM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_EET-CPN_02-14-24_DEFER_.PDF CPN-EET DEFER 9:46 AM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPN-EET_02-14-24_DEFER_.PDF CPN DEFER 10:00 AM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2024/hearingnotices/HEARING_CPN_02-14-24_DEFER-1_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6APBj0XuRE, 2026-07-02T01:23:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:10 - LBT-EDU 3:00 PM 02:03 - SB 718 10:00 - SB 1251 15:40 - DM LBT-EDU 3:00 PM 16:54 - EDU DEFER 3:00 PM 18:31 - SB 832 21:57 - SB 1022 23:55 - SB 1023 25:09 - EDU 3:10 PM 25:22 - SB 692 38:37 - SB 260 40:58 - SB 971 57:19 - SB 531, SD1 1:02:40 - DM EDU 3:10 PM 1:05:43 - EDU-HHS 3:45 PM 1:05:43 - SB 1443 1:26:42 - DM EDU-HHS 3:45 PM Hearing Notices: EDU 3:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EDU_02-13-23_DEFER_.PDF LBT-EDU 3:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_LBT-EDU_02-13-23_.PDF EDU 3:10 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EDU_02-13-23_.PDF EDU-HHS 3:45 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_EDU-HHS_02-13-23_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• It's not clear.<00:45:00.319> And<00:45:00.560> so<00:45:01.920> I<00:45:02.240>
• am<00:45:02.400> not<00:45:02.560> willing<00:45:02.880> to<00:45:03.040
• Um, we<00:45:23.280> also<00:45:23.680> know<00:45:23.920> from<00:45:24.240>
• against<00:45:38.960> the<00:45:39.119> will<00:45:39.359> of<00:45:39.520><
• 40.560> Uh<00:45:40.960> on<00:45:41.200> that<00:45:41.440> point,<00:45

Keywords: Concurrent meeting of the House Standing Committee on Elections, Constitutional Amendments, and Intergovernmental Affairs and the House Standing Committee on State Government. Title of video has been shortened due to YouTube length restrictions. Discussion of HCR 45: 00:04:14, 958, all

Summary: The joint meeting of the House Elections, Constitutional Amendments and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee and the House State Government Committee was called to consider House Concurrent Resolution 45, sponsored by Representative Jason Petri. The resolution would support calling for a federal balanced budget amendment through the Article V process. Petri argued that Kentucky’s own constitutional balanced-budget requirement shows the value of fiscal restraint, and he said decades of federal deficit spending and rising debt make a constitutional amendment necessary. Governor Ron DeSantis and Lauren Ends of the National Campaign for a Balanced Budget Amendment also testified in support, emphasizing the growth of federal debt, the risk of a future debt crisis, and the view that Congress is unlikely to solve the problem on its own. Members asked about the mechanics and risks of an Article V convention, including whether the convention’s “sole purpose” language would be enforceable and whether a convention could become a “runaway” process. DeSantis and Ends said states can impose guardrails on delegates, including criminal penalties and delegate-limitation laws, and noted that any proposed amendment would still require ratification by 38 states. They also said that if Congress chose to draft the amendment itself in response to state pressure, that would be acceptable. One witness said 18 states have passed faithful-delegate or delegate-limitation laws. Representative Callaway asked what would happen if the debt issue is not addressed. Witnesses responded that continued borrowing could lead to economic dislocation, higher interest costs, and a debt crisis that would crowd out other federal spending. They said the current debt burden is already more than $100,000 per U.S. citizen and roughly $300,000 per taxpayer, and that a balanced budget amendment would be a first step toward stopping the growth of debt before any long-term paydown could occur. The transcript provided does not show a final vote or other committee action on the resolution.

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NatCjjEzfhU, 2026-06-21T07:17:05+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Roll Call – 03:18 Kentucky School Improvement Efforts – 04:10 Consideration of Referred Administrative Regulation – 38:45, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Bills: HB229, HB3990, HB5082, HB5510, HB229

Keywords: biological sex, government information, definitions, sex-based distinctions, public health, flags, display, state law, municipalities, government buildings, drug enforcement, local control, home rule, municipal charter, county policy, ordinance preemption, state preemption, attorney general enforcement, civil penalties, mandamus

Bills: HB229, HB229, HB3990, HB5082, HB5510

Keywords: HB 229, Texas, political subdivision, local government, county dues, county association, state association of counties, lobbying, lobbyist, public funds, taxpayer lawsuit, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, Government Code Chapter 556, Local Government Code Section 89.002, legislative advocacy, municipal government, county government, city government, special district

Transcript Highlights:

• It's a men's chapter, Chapter 409, Acts of the 61st Legislature, Regular Session in 1969, to authorize
• So, and they're funded through those Chapter 133 funds. But it doesn't have to be that way.
• It modifies or brings to date Chapter 82 dealing with condominium associations and Chapter 209 dealing
• Chapter 92 of the Property Code on landlord-tenant issues was written in 1983.
• Chapter 94 is also being amended because it's a parallel statute that deals with home tenancies.

Bills: HB431, HB648, HB 1006, HB1926, HB2037, HB2468, HB2788, HB2791, HB3255, HB3260

Keywords: HB 431, Texas Property Code, Property Code Chapter 202, solar roof tiles, solar shingles, solar energy device, homeowners association, HOA, property owners' association, POA, renewable energy, residential solar, distributed solar, roof-mounted solar, homeowner rights, architectural control, restrictive covenants, real estate, subdivision regulations, multi-zoned subdivisions

Bills: S0774, S7028, S7024, S7026

Keywords: mental health, first responders, employment benefits, 911 telecommunicators, nervous injuries, retirement, elected officials, Deferred Retirement Option Program, DROP, cost-of-living adjustment, trade secret, public records exemption, public meetings exemption, open government, sunset review, agency confidentiality, proprietary business information, proprietary confidential business information, confidential records, Florida public records law

Summary: The Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability met and first heard Senate Bill 774, which would extend workers’ compensation medical benefits for employment-related mental or nervous injuries to 911 public safety telecommunicators, even without a physical injury. The sponsor and several dispatchers, a clinician, and communications directors testified in support, describing repeated exposure to traumatic calls, chronic understaffing, and the need for mental health treatment and retention support. Senator DiCeglie and Chair Mayfield praised dispatchers’ work, and the bill was reported favorably by committee vote, with Senator McClain later recorded as voting yes on the bill. The committee then took up SPB 7028, a retirement bill that sets Florida Retirement System employer contribution rates beginning July 1, 2026, leaves the 3% employee contribution unchanged, allows certain elected officers to receive a DROP payout under specified conditions, and provides a 1.5% alternative cost-of-living adjustment for eligible special risk retirees. Firefighters, police, sheriffs, and chiefs’ groups spoke in support, emphasizing recruitment and retention. The committee voted to submit the proposal as a committee bill and reported it favorably. Finally, the committee considered SPB 7024 and SPB 7026, both open-government-related bills. SPB 7024 would repeal the current public records and public meeting exemption for cybersecurity information and consolidate agency-specific cybersecurity exemptions into one agency-wide exemption. SPB 7026 would repeal the current public records exemption for trade secrets held by an agency and similarly consolidate specific trade secret exemptions into one agency-wide exemption. Neither bill drew testimony or debate, and both were submitted as committee bills and reported favorably. The meeting then adjourned.