Video & Transcript Research : 'statutory construction'

Page 108 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 17th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • economy. nine colleges offering programs in critical and fast-growing fields, including nursing, construction
  • SB 687 by Hughes ruling the liability for land serving services in connection with other construction
  • jurisprudence sp783 by Miminenda is relating to regulations adopted by governmental entities, but the construction
FL

Florida 2026 4th Special Session

February 4, 2026 - 09:00 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • If the county needed to acquire, for example, a temporary construction easement for ingress and egress
  • Representative Driskell: That this is consistent with our current statutory scheme in terms of how we
  • The amendment simply establishes a set of best management practices for solar facility construction,
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Local and County Government Feb 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Local and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The state statutory penalty follows. Follow-up question. This is very confusing.
  • because they are such large counties, and the assessor has so many facilities to look at when construction
  • happen in the larger counties because the larger counties struggle with assessing all of the new construction
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • You know, every State lake, we have jurisdictional statutory mandate to work those lakes and do enforcement
  • When I put that out for bid, perhaps even the same architect and construction companies could do both
  • Just curious about the security upgrades you're talking about, cameras, and construction on a vest wool
Keywords: 914, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

December 2, 2025 - 01:00 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • WE HAVE STATUTORY LANGUAGE HERE, BUT WE WILL USE SOME WALKING AROUND LINK WHICH TO DESCRIBE THESE PICK
  • EVERY SINGLE UNIT OWNER, IT HAS TAKEN A LOT MORE TIME TO GET THESE APPLICATIONS TURNED IN, TO GET CONSTRUCTION
  • SO THAT I THINK HAS CAUSED THEM TO DELAY THEIR CONSTRUCTION, SO ONE THING BEGETS THE OTHER BUT IT IS
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on County & Regional Government Mar 24th, 2025

S/C on County & Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • I should also point out these Local Provider Participation Funds have extensive statutory...
  • allow the commissioners court of the applicable county to adopt an order prohibiting a person from constructing
  • Landowners to that reservoir, when the reservoir or the land was acquired, construction and those controlling
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation Apr 17th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, there are no statutory timelines for certain parts of the permitting process, including setting
  • of timing in the regulatory process for LNG facilities can impact customer offtake agreements, construction
  • We've got another four that are under construction.
  • There are currently two operational LNG terminals in Texas with four under construction and some other
  • Haiti right now, it's under construction. And the firm Offtake then allowed them to build.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Regulated Industries Mar 12th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • And last question, if you're if some construction activity rips up a bunch of potable water lines that
  • Statutory scope of work by local building departments.
  • Tropicana feel toppling of 40 story construction a little more than one block from my legislative office
  • Petersburg was actually preempted by state law from regulating construction cranes in any way, even in
  • What happened is certainly a horrible example of how construction is inherently dangerous and things
Keywords: 999, senate, all
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • Maybe it's a statutory data they do.
  • Maybe it's a statutory rationale<00:35:41.599> maybe<00:35:41.760> it's<00:35:42.240>
  • <00:48:09.359> Construction<00:48:10.000> assistance personnel costs.
  • Construction assistance personnel costs.
  • No new construction grants have been funded for a number of years.
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The Interim Joint Committee on State Government met for its first meeting and heard a presentation from the Kentucky Center for Statistics (KY Stats) by Executive Director Matt Barry and Legislative Director Calli Arnold. The presentation reviewed KY Stats’ statutory background, its evolution from KESUS, its board membership, and its role in housing Kentucky’s longitudinal data system and labor market information office. Barry explained that KY Stats links data from multiple state sources, validates and cleans it, deidentifies it, and uses it to produce reports, evaluations, and responses to data requests for policymakers, practitioners, and the public. Barry described the scale of the system, noting more than 6,000 active data elements, 178 unique file types, and data from 48 sources across 26 agencies. He highlighted the agency’s privacy and security practices, including separate servers for source data and deidentified reporting data, and said KY Stats does not use real-time data. He also outlined the types of reports produced, including the annual high school feedback report and a recent life outcomes report tracking the 2017 public high school cohort’s postsecondary education, completion, wages, and employment outcomes. Members asked about the timeliness and availability of data, especially SNAP and Medicaid information, and Barry said most data arrive annually or quarterly and that Medicaid data had been used in a limited one-time project rather than as an ongoing feed. Questions also focused on artificial intelligence; Barry said KY Stats has not integrated AI but is exploring it cautiously because of privacy and security concerns. Several members encouraged further work with AI tools, while Barry emphasized that any use would need to protect confidentiality. The committee also discussed staffing and funding, with Barry saying KY Stats has about 49 total staff and annual funding of roughly $3.1 million in state general funds, plus federal labor-related funding. Committee members praised the agency’s work and suggested legislators may not fully understand its capabilities. No votes or formal actions were taken.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • <01:10:27.120> When of maintenance and construction.
  • When of maintenance and construction.
  • is capped out at the $175,000 statutory is capped out at the $175,000 statutory limit<01:36:38.960
  • Um, and by providing statutory requirement for these benefits and appropriating specific funding, um,
  • these<02:04:24.880> benefits statutory requirement for these benefits statutory requirement
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 2485, which would require cardiovascular screening for student athletes. The Department of Education and Department of Health said they support the bill’s intent but noted that many screenings are already part of existing school-entry and well-child exams. The Attorney General’s office asked for clarifying language on who performs the screenings, where results go, how “positive findings” are defined, how referrals would work, and whether funding would be appropriated if DOE must hire health professionals. The American Heart Association strongly supported the bill, citing the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in young athletes and arguing that sports physicals are an effective opportunity for early detection. No vote was taken, and the committee moved on after testimony. The committee then heard HB 89, concerning a school psychologist working group and possible licensing or credentialing of school psychologists. The Department of Education and Board of Psychology supported the measure. The Hawaii Psychological Association said it supports licensing school psychologists but asked to be included in the working group, arguing it is an important stakeholder. The Hawaii Association of School Psychologists opposed including HPA, saying the issue is between school psychologists and DCCA and that HPA is not part of their organization. Testimony and discussion focused on the long-running disagreement over whether school psychologists should be regulated under the Board of Psychology or another mechanism, and on title protection and scope of practice. No action was reported during this portion. The committee also took up HB 2445, relating to standardized emergency responses for immigration enforcement at or near schools. The Department of Education said it already issued internal law-enforcement guidance and questioned whether the bill was necessary, while also raising concerns about the bill’s 1,000-foot buffer language and the limits of school authority over activity off campus. The Board of Education echoed those concerns and suggested the bill may need clearer definitions. Supporters, including the White Coalition for Immigrant Rights, the Legal Clinic, and an attorney testifying on Know Your Rights training, argued that recent federal changes have increased ICE activity near schools and that a law is needed to ensure clear, public protocols, staff training, and family protections. A student testifier said the measure was a top priority of the state student council. The transcript ends during testimony, with no vote or final committee action shown.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Committee on Housing (02/03/2026)

Housing

Transcript Highlights:
  • And in construction of additional ADUs.
  • <04:04:13.439> or ability to maintain, construct or ability to maintain, construct or improve
  • But if you just look at new construction, newly constructed manufactured housing has been built since
  • So if you look at new construction.
  • > housing, newly constructed manufactured housing, newly constructed manufactured housing, those
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The subcommittee first took up House Bill 1598 and an amendment, 2026-0463H. Elliott Barry and Nick Norman testified that the amendment reflected a hard-fought compromise balancing concerns from all sides, and they urged no further changes. With no questions from members, the subcommittee voted unanimously to recommend the bill with the amendment to the full committee, 3-0, and closed the subcommittee. The housing committee then moved through several executive session bills. HB 1010 was amended with 2026-0274H, described as clarifying and implementing prior housing law (HB 631) governing residential units above office and retail space; the amendment was adopted unanimously and the bill was reported ought to pass as amended on a 17-0 vote and placed on consent. HB 65 was then voted ought to pass and also placed on consent, with members saying it was duplicative of the compromise reached on HB 1010. HB 1349 was reconsidered for a clarifying vote and again received unanimous support for its prior disposition, 17-0, and was placed on consent. The committee next took up HB 1523, which concerned homeowners associations. An amendment, 2026-0380H, removed Section 5’s Attorney General enforcement mechanism, added HOA conflict-of-interest approval language, and delayed the effective date to give stakeholders more time; it was adopted unanimously. The bill then passed 18-0 as amended and was put on consent. The committee also voted ITL on CACR 16, a constitutional amendment related to sleeping or homelessness issues, after debate over unintended consequences and whether it protected a basic right; the vote was 10-8, with a majority report assigned and a minority report to be written. Later, HB 108, dealing with inclusionary zoning, was voted ITL 10-8 after members argued the bill imposed unrealistic burdens and could halt development; a minority report was noted with amendment 0149H. HB 7, concerning ADUs and restrictive covenants, was also voted ITL 10-8 after discussion of unintended consequences and a proposed amendment to encourage second ADUs; it was sent to the regular calendar with a minority report and amendment 0289H. HB 1120, on water-related subdivision requirements, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent, with one member noting a study amendment had been offered. HB 1143, addressing housing-provider obligations and municipal enforcement powers, was ITL’d 17-1 and placed on consent. Finally, HB 1145, a fee/tax proposal tied to housing development, was ITL’d 11-7; members debated whether it would discourage development, and a minority report was assigned.
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Conference Committee on Budget May 4th, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Conference Committee on Budget

Transcript Highlights:
  • Do we have a statutory definition of top-tier public cloud?
  • It seems like this would be better vetted through a statutory bill.
  • I mean, it is a statutory program.
  • We did House. 345 statutory pay, House. 350, Senate. 350 at the bottom of the page, Senate.
  • We did House. 345 statutory pay, House. 350, Senate. 350 at the bottom page, Senate.
Keywords: 959, house, all
AR

Arkansas 2026 1st Special Session

LEGISLATIVE JOINT AUDITING Jun 5th, 2026

LEGISLATIVE JOINT AUDITING

Transcript Highlights:
  • The two largest revolving loan funds are the Construction Assistance and the Safe Drinking Water revolving
  • The two largest revolving loan funds are the construction assistance and the safe drinking water revolving
  • Also in 2025, there was a $1.3 billion increase in construction in progress at the Arkansas Department
  • There is a statutory requirement under law that when an official who's over public funds is identified
  • It's a statutory requirement under law that when an official who's over public funds is identified and
Summary: The committee met to adopt prior minutes and reports from its executive and standing committees, including counties and municipalities, educational institutions, and state agencies. Those reports covered routine audit activity, delinquent private water and sewer audits, municipal accounting compliance issues, education audit findings, and several state agency audit items. The committee also reviewed and adopted the State of Arkansas annual comprehensive financial report for fiscal year 2025 and the related single audit report, both presented by Legislative Audit staff. The state financial report showed unmodified opinions on the state’s financial statements and described total assets of about $41.9 billion and liabilities of about $11.1 billion, along with retirement system assets of $39.9 billion and a net pension liability of $9 billion. Two material weaknesses were identified: insufficient internal controls at the Office of State Technology to monitor threats and unauthorized access, and a Division of Workforce Services methodology change for unemployment-related estimates that was not properly documented or approved. The single audit covered $12.4 billion in federal awards across 469 programs, with 16 major programs reviewed; it resulted in 33 findings, 14 with questioned costs totaling $16.6 million, and qualified opinions for the Summer EBT program, the Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund, and the Child Care Development Fund cluster. Members questioned agency officials in detail about the Summer EBT questioned costs, DHS unresolved findings, broadband grant documentation, cyber security controls, workers’ compensation liabilities, and child care funding and reporting. DHS explained that the Summer EBT issue involved drawing federal funds in advance rather than as benefits were redeemed, and said the process has been corrected. Broadband officials said the questioned $6.6 million reflected documentation-detail disagreements across many invoices rather than missing payments. OST officials described new logging, endpoint detection, and phishing-training efforts, and DFA and Education officials addressed specific audit findings and corrective actions. The committee ultimately moved to hold the two large statewide reports over until the August meeting for further review, with discussion continuing on whether to release some agency staff in the meantime.
AR

Arkansas 2026 Regular Session

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT Mar 16th, 2026

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT

Transcript Highlights:
  • There is a statutory process for contesting the conveyance, and the claimants did not follow that process
  • I've been denied my statutory rights. Your right to what? I mean, what?
  • Appeals case that was filed, which was Andrew Simpson versus Carl Davis doing business as Davis Construction
  • This was a breach of construction contract case. Mr.
  • As I understand it, the state is only involved to the extent that there was a breach of construction
Keywords: 1204, all
UT

Utah 2025 Regular Session

Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Interim Committee - November 19, 2025

Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Interim Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • tie of resources to customers will allow the company to move forward quickly on selecting and constructing
  • And that's the way that we're meeting the statutory requirement for the approved vendors list.
  • In the actual requirements, it talks about what our statutory requirements are.
  • They expect to have their NRC construction permit by the end of the year, and those are preliminary to
  • They are still working through the permitting process, but they've now started construction.
Keywords: 985, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Budget Committee Sep 11th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill includes statutory changes to do both of the following: expands exemptions from CEQA and coastal
  • SB 158, housing and homelessness, would enact various statutory changes related to housing programs to
  • able to protect more Californians from harmful effects from, arguably, not a simple residential construction
  • Keith Dunn, here on behalf of the State Building Construction Trades Council as well as the District
  • Chair, Keith Dunn, here on behalf of the State Building Construction Trades Council as well as the District
Summary: The Assembly Budget Committee held an informational hearing on the September budget package, which included SB 105 and a series of trailer bills covering health, human services, education, resources, child care, transportation, labor, public safety, housing, revenue, background checks, collective bargaining, and a special election. The Department of Finance described the package as largely technical and clarifying, but also responsive to state and federal changes, especially H.R. 1. Key items included roughly $3.3 billion in Proposition 4 climate and environmental spending, $540 million in discretionary greenhouse gas reduction funds, and major responses to H.R. 1 such as CalFresh error-rate mitigation, food bank support, and Medicaid-related changes. Other notable provisions included vaccine policy flexibility, an Abortion Access Fund, a gender-affirming care program, community college basic-needs and aid changes, CEQA and coastal permit exemptions tied to the 2028 Olympics, invasive mussel prevention funding, a civic media program, labor and pension-related provisions, and special election administration changes. Members raised questions and concerns about several parts of the package. There was support for climate, water, transit, offshore wind, food security, and health investments, but also significant criticism of the lack of cleanup language for SB 131 and its advanced manufacturing exemptions, with multiple members saying promised fixes had not materialized and expressing concerns about tribal consultation, labor standards, and environmental protections. Members also questioned the scale and timing of some Proposition 4 allocations, including fairground upgrades, regional conveyance, and a UC Davis alternative protein research center. The Department of Finance said some programs would roll out over time and that certain funding levels reflected current implementation capacity. The hearing also featured discussion of Bay Area transit financing, with Finance saying SB 105 directs the department and CalSTA to examine loan or other financing options rather than immediately providing loans. Members and public commenters also discussed the state’s response to H.R. 1, with advocates supporting food bank, health care, and immunization provisions while warning of ongoing harm to immigrants, foster youth, and other vulnerable groups. Public testimony broadly supported the health, food, water, offshore wind, and golden mussel provisions, while many speakers echoed legislative concerns about SB 131 and urged cleanup action in the next session. No votes were taken because the hearing was informational only, though the chair noted votes on the bills were expected later that night or the next morning.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Budget Committee Jun 11th, 2025

Budget

Transcript Highlights:
  • The budget also advances landmark policies that will fast-track housing construction and improve affordability
  • ICE in to raid and to lock up these hard-working Californians that our economy counts on—from construction
  • I've spoken directly with the department and conveyed our interest in being constructive partners.
  • Also part of the May revision and approved as part of this budget is the suspension of the statutory
  • The statutory COLA was being provided in the January budget in order to increase funding rates for the
Keywords: 988, house, all
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Fiscal Policy Apr 2nd, 2025

Fiscal Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Specifically, a few things to build as a statute by updating or eliminating statutory provisions that
  • Statutory provisions that are obsolete or no longer necessary for the safe and effective regulation of
  • semester, removes the provision related to the option of setting aside 10% of allocated funds for construction
  • So I think about construction and different things, like you say, based on the program, which is the
  • Commission's grant programs that are funded by the Fuel Tax Collection Trust Fund may be awarded for the construction
Summary: The committee first heard CS for CS for SB 344, which would modernize the Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991 based on Public Service Commission recommendations. The bill drew no opposition and was reported favorably. Members then took up several Senator Burton measures: CS for SB 714 on non-opioid advanced directives, which was amended to create a Department of Health website access point for a voluntary form allowing patients to notify providers they do not want opioid medications; CS for SB 738 on child care and early learning providers, which streamlines and updates child care regulation and was supported by industry and business groups; CS for SB 756 on health insurance coverage for individuals with developmental disabilities, which removes the age-8 diagnosis limit and age cap for mandated autism-related coverage; and CS for CS for SB 1356, creating a Florida Institute for Pediatric Rare Diseases at FSU and a newborn genetic testing pilot, later amended to add FIU and Nicklaus Children’s Hospital to the board and remove specific appropriations. All of these bills were reported favorably. The committee also approved CS for CS for SB 1624 on higher education, a broad bill affecting tuition policies, workforce programs, institutional governance, and naming changes. The bill generated extended discussion over replacing references to “minority” with “underrepresented,” with the sponsor explaining the intent was to focus on low-income access and student support, while members raised concerns about impacts on majority-minority institutions and preeminence pathways. An amendment added guardrails for private religious postsecondary institutions by requiring public review of affidavits of compliance and giving the Commission for Independent Education enforcement authority. After debate, the bill was reported favorably. The committee then passed CS for SB 1626 on child welfare, which addresses military-family investigations, emergency shelter certification, children’s services council appointments, criminal-background exemptions, group-home rates, licensing extensions, small residential group homes, missing-children procedures, and psychotropic medication refills; it was amended to adjust council board composition and then reported favorably. Additional bills approved included SB 178, directing Florida A&M University to conduct an agronomic study on emerging crops for land taken out of production; SB 1162, expanding boating improvement funding for trailer parking and offering lease incentives for clean marine manufacturers; CS for CS for SB 958, creating a type 1 diabetes early detection information program for parents and schools; CS for CS for CS for SB 1070, requiring ECGs for student athletes with phased implementation and exemptions, after extensive testimony from parents and advocates about sudden cardiac arrest; CS for SB 774, requiring electronic transmission of certain court orders to sheriffs within six hours; SB 1516, creating an International Aerospace Innovation Fund administered by Space Florida; SB 994, revising driver education requirements and prompting a commitment to add distracted-driving instruction; and CS for CS for SB 1402, expanding eligibility for dropout retrieval programs. The committee also took up SB 810 on stormwater management systems, amending it to focus annual inspections on vulnerable MS4 infrastructure. That bill drew significant opposition from the Florida League of Cities, counties, and stormwater groups, who argued the mandate would duplicate existing permit requirements and impose major costs, but supporters said it was a basic flood-prevention measure. The transcript ends during debate on SB 810, before a final vote is shown.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So we found that consistent, timely, and equitable enforcement is integral to implementing our statutory
  • We quickly moved to partner with the Legislature, make necessary statutory changes around particularly
  • And that's exactly what we did with these recent statutory changes and the regulations that we set forth
  • Earlier this year in March, we released the first draft of the plan and met the statutory deadline for
  • change. ...permits, not letting them lapse, and reform gave us statutory changes that help because now
Summary: The joint oversight hearing focused on DTSC’s implementation of SB 158 reforms, including enforcement, community engagement, fee stability, the hazardous waste management plan, permitting backlogs, and the Safer Consumer Products program. Senators and Assembly members emphasized protecting overburdened communities and asked how DTSC and the Board of Environmental Safety are using their authority to improve accountability, reduce delays, and address hazardous waste facilities and consumer product chemicals. The hearing also included discussion of extended producer responsibility programs and whether DTSC can support them more efficiently, including through coordination with CalRecycle. DTSC Director Katie Butler said the department is now more transparent, accountable, and fiscally stable, citing stronger enforcement actions, an interactive inspections map, expanded community outreach, and emergency response work on the Los Angeles wildfire cleanup. She said DTSC has made progress on fee reform, the hazardous waste management plan, cleanup grants, permit renewals, and safer consumer products rulemaking, including adding microplastics to the candidate chemical list. Board Chair Andrew Rakestraw said the board has held multiple public meetings and hearings, is working on fee rates and performance metrics, and is revising the hazardous waste management plan after public comment, including removing a proposal to send certain contaminated soil to municipal landfills. He also noted remaining concerns about fee structure, permit delays, and the pace of the safer consumer products program. Public witnesses offered sharply different views. A representative of the California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance said SB 158 reforms have improved permitting and transparency, but urged more attention to risk-based decision-making, reduced duplication, and possible General Fund support for plan implementation rather than relying only on fees. Earthjustice argued DTSC remains too slow and that communities continue to suffer from long-delayed permits and weak protections, urging the Legislature to take a more active role and to prioritize eliminating hazardous substances rather than minimizing costs. Committee members pressed the witnesses on permit renewals, community impacts, and the pace of the safer consumer products program, while DTSC defended its progress and said further legislative collaboration may be needed on hazardous waste management and emerging waste streams.