Transcript Highlights:

• We reviewed those applications.
• medical cannabis or started our program medical cannabis or started our program here<00:23:36.080
• standing and we reviewed those first. standing and we reviewed those first.
• states had a medical cannabis program states had a medical cannabis program before<00:31:06.880>
• ,<00:43:05.520> really when we launched this program, really when we launched this program

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:20 Approval of June 4, 2026 Minutes 00:03:09 Prioritizing Kentucky Agriculture: Medical Cannabis 00:03:38 Prioritizing Kentucky Agriculture: Bourbon 01:41:03, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• programs.
• Is this an expansion of a current program, or is this a new program?
• Is this an expansion of a current program, or is this a new program?
• program, or is this a new program? program, or is this a new program?
• How does the program go forward? How does the program go forward?

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the September 19 meeting minutes and then took up a deferred University of Kentucky personal services contract amendment for guardianship services. UK officials explained that the contract covers court-appointed guardians for patients who cannot make medical decisions and are not eligible for state guardianship, with the work funded by UK Medical Center agency dollars rather than the general fund. Members questioned the large increase in the not-to-exceed amount, the number of cases, the hourly billing structure, and whether there are safeguards to prevent unnecessary costs or reimbursement issues if a patient later has resources. UK said the increase reflects shifting work from a prior firm, anticipated new cases, a move from a monthly fee to hourly billing, and the need for a second firm because one prior attorney died and another firm has had difficulty appearing in court promptly. The committee ultimately approved the contract, while Senator Thomas said he would vote aye but urged future review of attorney fee limits and broader guardianship statutes, which he described as outdated and inconsistent. The committee then deferred three Office of Energy Policy memorandum of agreement items to the November 2025 meeting without objection. After that, it approved the remaining agenda items, including the contract lists and deferred items not separately selected for review. The final major item was a University of Kentucky personal services contract related to fundraising and philanthropic outreach. UK representatives said the contract supports marketing and donor engagement efforts to grow the university’s endowment pipeline and philanthropic support. The transcript cuts off before the committee finished its questions or took final action on that item.

Transcript Highlights:

• LASTLY WE HAVE OUR HOSPITAL DIRECTED PAYMENT PROGRAM.
• AND DATA DRIVEN GOALS FOR THE PROGRAMS AND RECORDING.
• NEXT OF HEALTHY BEHAVIORS PROGRAMS.
• THIS REVIEW RESULTED IN 114 IN THE AMOUNT OF 953,500.
• WHAT WE ARE LOOKING TO DO WITH THAT PROGRAM IS INCREASE.

Transcript Highlights:

• That must include program evaluation to demonstrate program effectiveness so that more programs can be
• like that and that must include program like that and that must include program evaluation<00:04
• Committee that review mortality Review Committee that review process<00:39:21.440> is<00:39:21.599
• <00:42:33.599> Committee<00:42:34.480> review mortality Review Committee review mortality
• We are currently doing reviews.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . program. program.
• program.
• The intention of the review will be to look at how DHS should be structured, how we can embed more program
• . program. program.
• program.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The agencies here today have successfully implemented such a program.
• We were going to add a proposal to audit a program... ...started yet.
• We were going to add a proposal to audit a program that hadn't started yet.
• We haven't conducted a comprehensive review of their use for years, perhaps.
• And hasn't been deeply reviewed by the Legislature in decades.

Summary: The committee heard several audit requests and related testimony. The first major item was an audit of Coachella Valley Unified School District’s contract and fiscal management. The author and supporters described long-standing fiscal mismanagement, large budget shortfalls, layoffs, contracting concerns, and questions about the district’s foundation and use of public funds. District representatives and the Riverside County Office of Education said the district is already under fiscal oversight, has a stabilization plan, and is working to reduce deficits and improve student outcomes. After extensive debate and public comment, the motion to approve the audit was put on call because the committee did not have the required votes from both houses at that moment. The committee then approved an audit of East Bay transit agencies in Alameda and Contra Costa counties. Senator Wahab argued the region’s many overlapping transit agencies create fragmentation, duplication, and inefficiency, especially amid a fiscal cliff and possible future tax increases. Transit agencies and labor representatives opposed the audit, saying the agencies already undergo multiple audits, serve distinct local needs, and are implementing regional coordination efforts. After testimony from agency leaders and public commenters, the committee voted to approve the audit. The next item was an audit of California Community Colleges’ unrestricted reserves. Senator Archuleta and supporting faculty representatives said reserves have grown substantially and may be diverting resources from student services, instruction, and workforce programs. They argued there is little oversight when reserves become too high. The Chancellor’s Office and Calbright College were invited to respond, and the audit objectives focused on reserve growth, reasons for high balances, oversight by the Chancellor’s Office, and effects on students and staff. The transcript cuts off during the Chancellor’s Office response, so the final committee action on this item is not shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• house ways a Means Committee reviewed house ways a Means Committee reviewed house<00:03:08.040><
• fiscal estimate we have for the program fiscal estimate we have for the program and<00:10:38.760
• <00:16:04.800> both future and and as we reviewed both future and and as we reviewed both
• First, we reviewed our communication with the agency on the fiscal note review, and it was extensive.
• staff more or less on on tax spit review staff more or less on on tax spit review commission<01:

Bills: HF3

Keywords: legislative auditor, reporting, accountability, state finance, executive agency oversight, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Really important programs.
• So thank you for that program.
• But it differs in the programs.
• There are two programs here: the elections program and then the administration and operations program
• There are two programs here: the elections program and then the administration and operations program

Bills: HB1

Keywords: feed bill, legislative appropriations, legislative branch, New Mexico Legislature, general fund, legislative council service, legislative finance committee, legislative education study committee, house chief clerk, senate chief clerk, per diem, mileage, session expenses, interim committees, district staff, capitol complex, capital outlay data system, legislative processing system, redistricting, census redistricting

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:11:54.720> like anything set up to run a program like anything set up to run a program
• Um, it was unclear about whether that internal review becomes the external review.
• program's community safety program plan. program's community safety program plan.
• . program. program.
• . programs. programs.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The joint hearing opened with House Bill 1969, which would provide state funding for colorectal cancer screenings for uninsured and underinsured residents. The Department of Human Services said it supports the goal of early screening but would need new administrative capacity, including a program manager and claim pre-screening, to run the program. The Department of Health supported the measure and cited low screening rates in Hawaii, noting an educational campaign to encourage screening. The Insurance Division raised concerns about reliance on federal FAQs, warning that guidance can change and may create state cost exposure. Supporters including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network and the Hawaii Medical Association argued the bill would close a preventive-care gap, reduce late-stage diagnoses, and save long-term costs; the committee also discussed implementation costs, estimated by DHS at roughly $1.4 million to $2 million annually plus administrative expenses, and a 6-month to 1-year timeline to establish the program. The committee then took up House Bill 1965, which would require health carriers to spend at least 6% of total medical expenditures on primary care providers. The Insurance Division said several provisions raise technical and legal concerns, including the premium freeze, the medical loss ratio language, the lack of an existing external review process for downcoding claims, and a new mandate for medically necessary inter-island transportation that could trigger an ACA defrayal. The Department of Human Services supported the intent but suggested broader language to include primary care supports and services, and noted that QUEST integration plans already invested at least 9% of total medical expenditures in primary care in 2024, with additional spending on supports and low-value care reductions. State health planning officials strongly supported the bill as an investment in primary care, saying it could improve outcomes and lower long-term costs, though they acknowledged a possible temporary premium increase during the transition. Testimony in support emphasized Hawaii’s physician shortage, especially on Maui, the Big Island, and other neighbor islands, and warned that clinics are under financial strain and may close without higher primary care reimbursement. The Hawaii Healthcare Task Force, AARP Hawaii, and other supporters said the bill would help retain providers, improve access for Medicare and Medicaid patients, and prevent downstream costs from emergency room use and avoidable hospitalizations. No votes or final committee action were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• We kind of divided the work into two different sections: the financial audit review and our program evaluation
• review.
• evaluation, or a special audit, program evaluation, or a special review.<00:02:03.160> So,<00
• evaluation uh review and our program evaluation uh review and our program evaluation review.<00:02
• OLA's Program Evaluation Division. OLA's Program Evaluation Division.

Transcript Highlights:

• by program.
• <00:08:15.599> by is go kind of goes by program by is go kind of goes by program by program
• program for decades.
• program for decades.
• program for decades.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Labor held an informational briefing on August 22, 2025, to receive an update from DEH on statewide recruitment efforts aimed at reducing vacancies across state departments. Director Hashimoto, joined by DEH staff, presented on two hiring initiatives: Wikiwiki Hire and Operation Hire Hawaii. The committee focused on how each program works, how quickly applications are screened and referred, and how the programs differ from standard recruitment procedures. For Wikiwiki Hire, DEH described it as an accelerated recruitment pathway used mainly for classes with multiple vacancies. DEH screens applications every two weeks, then sends qualified applicants a list of participating departments and recruiter contact information so applicants and departments can connect directly. Committee members asked about effectiveness data, timelines, and whether the process aligns with the merit principle. DEH said the program is intended to speed hiring, that departments are not required to interview every person on a list, and that applicants can be hired as vacancies are filled on a first-come, first-served basis so long as all qualified applicants have the same opportunity. DEH also said it could provide data later and that it is working through a backlog of screenings. The committee then discussed Operation Hire Hawaii, an executive-order-based hiring effort launched in February to expedite hiring, including for displaced federal workers but open to all applicants. DEH reported more than 6,000 applications, 127 recruitments, 81 closed recruitments, and 142 hires, with a goal of conditional offers within two weeks. DEH said it turns applications around daily, while departments do the initial screening, interviews, and hiring decisions, with DEH completing final qualification screening and suitability checks at the end. Members asked about the program’s duration, its low conversion rate, and what happens to applicants who are not hired; DEH said it can refer qualified applicants to other vacancies and that the pilot was originally intended to run about a year, with possible extension if departments want it to continue.

Transcript Highlights:

• are programs are um programs that are programs are um programs that are provided<00:11:01.680>
• A certified program is actually a program that meets a license exemption.
• programs there.
• programs there.
• > and assistance program that CCAP program and assistance program that CCAP program and created<00

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• to make sure we have program integrity. to make sure we have program integrity.
• Um, that is also under review.
• Um, that is also under review.
• Um, that is also under review.
• People can't get into the programs that actually need the programs.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We also have a program review process, and we review programs on a schedule for all campuses, but once
• > programs and we review programs and we review programs on<00:24:21.600> a<00:24:21.720
• And as part of our program review.
• <00:46:48.520> programs sure that um when we review programs sure that um when we review programs
• We have a program review still relevant.

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Artificial Intelligence Task Force met and adopted the prior minutes before turning to AI in education. Jeff Gagne of the Southern Regional Education Board described SREB’s Commission on AI in Education, which has organized its work into committees on policy, K-12 instruction, postsecondary instruction, and skills development. He highlighted eight commission recommendations covering statewide AI networks, targeted guidance for different user groups, professional development, standards and curricula, local capacity assessments, risk management, procurement, and AI-ready workforce skills. He also emphasized that states need more specific guidance for students, teachers, faculty, administrators, and parents, and that training is essential because many educators have not been prepared to use AI in instruction. Gagne also summarized two recent SREB reports: one on AI-ready workforce skills and one on AI use in K-12 classrooms. The workforce report recommends embedding AI across standards, strengthening computer science and digital learning standards, collaborating with industry and workforce agencies, building AI competencies into training and upskilling, providing educator professional development, and monitoring readiness. He said the report identifies three skill areas: success skills, industry baseline skills, and technical skills. The classroom guidance report promotes responsible AI adoption, with four pillars focused on increasing cognitive demand, streamlining teaching and administrative work, supporting personalized learning, and developing ethical AI users. He also noted that the report includes an AI procurement tool for school districts. Members thanked Gagne for providing outside examples and resources. One member noted JCPS has an introductory AI professional development offering for educators. Gagne said Kentucky’s David Couch serves on the SREB commission and that the commission’s member list and reports are available on SREB’s website. The committee then heard from Travis Powell of the Council on Postsecondary Education, who said CPE had surveyed campuses and found that Kentucky institutions have broadly embraced AI in teaching, research, student services, and administrative operations. He said all institutions have AI-focused degrees, minors, or courses, and many are integrating AI into general education and across disciplines. Powell also said CPE is considering an AI consortium and that campuses are using AI in research partnerships and applied work, while continuing to focus on ethical and effective use.

Transcript Highlights:

• I am here to offer testimony on H. 2298, facilitating site plan review.
• I am here to offer testimony on H. 2298, facilitating site plan review.
• or timelines to review projects.
• So yes, to the site plan review, please support.
• We also support YIMBY and site plan review.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Housing held a hybrid hearing on zoning, Chapter 40B, and related housing bills. Much of the testimony focused on the “Yes in My Backyard” bill (H. 1572/S. 962), which would expand by-right development of missing middle housing, reduce barriers such as minimum lot sizes and parking mandates, and support duplexes, triplexes, and other small-scale housing. Supporters included housing advocates, developers, local officials, and municipal leaders from places like Cambridge, Salem, and Braintree, who argued that state action is needed because local zoning often blocks needed housing and that the bill would help create more affordable, neighborhood-compatible homes. Several witnesses also backed a companion “Yes in God’s Backyard” bill (H. 2347), which would allow faith-based institutions to build housing on their property by right, with testimony emphasizing the potential for new units, added municipal tax revenue, and partnerships between religious organizations and housing developers. The committee also heard testimony on Senate Bill 1021 to modernize Chapter 40R incentives. Senator Pavel Payano and others said the program’s payments have not kept pace with inflation since 2004 and should be increased to better encourage smart-growth zoning near transit and town centers. Another major topic was H. 2298 on site plan review, which would codify and standardize the process in state law. Rep. Kristin Kassner and witnesses from MAPC and NAIOP said current site plan review practices vary widely across the state, creating confusion, delays, and litigation, while a uniform framework would give municipalities clearer tools to review by-right projects without undermining local oversight. The hearing also included testimony on Chapter 40B reform, including S. 1005 and H. 1537. One witness supported further review of 40B and stronger regional planning, while another backed a proposal to allow certain pre-2010 40B condominium owners to sell at market value under a framework that would recapture some of the subsidy benefits. Committee members asked several questions about local zoning changes, housing goals by county, and how the proposed bills would affect communities. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the chairs indicated that written testimony would be welcomed for technical details and additional comments.

Transcript Highlights:

• required for the Department's review required for the Department's review since<00:15:10.519>
• and deadlines might levels of review and deadlines might apply<00:17:11.319> review<00:17:11.679
• While initially exploring the license plate program, NHSA identified the existing plate decal program
• down to a two-year program.
• > that shoveled down to a two-year program that shoveled down to a two-year program that money

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• These are programs that are age-appropriate, evidence-based programming that are designed specifically
• That doesn’t preclude it from being reviewed at a different time. That’s just a mandatory review.
• then it says that it can be reviewed then it says that it can be reviewed that<00:18:46.320>
• to use that program.
• like any other program in the state, you are not eligible to use that program.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The biggest programs they run are the federal energy assistance program and the federal weatherization
• like the Xcel PowerOn program, Minnesota's CARE program, CenterPoint's Gas Affordability Program, and
• like the Xcel PowerOn program, Minnesota's CARE program, CenterPoint's Gas Affordability Program, and
• program, Centerpoint's Gas Affordability program, Centerpoint's Gas Affordability Program,<01:19
• We have not yet standard review.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• It was a very unique, innovative program back in the day.
• <00:26:23.480> have evaluated through post and review have evaluated through post and review
• The committee will stand at ease. review process so this would keep the review process so this would
• loadbearing wall and these program loadbearing wall and these program accreditations<01:16:22.760
• I'm just saying. of programs that promote diversity and of programs that promote diversity and we're<

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Senate Education Committee met with a quorum and first considered two concurrent resolutions. SCR 76, sponsored by Sen. Amanda Bledsoe, would create a Kentucky School for the Deaf Governance Task Force to examine the school’s future governance and its relationship with the Kentucky Department of Education. Bledsoe described the school’s long history and said the task force would give the small deaf-school community more voice. The committee adopted the resolution unanimously with favorable expression. The committee then took up SCR 131, sponsored by Sen. Max Wise, to continue the Efficient and Effective Districts Task Force from 2024. Wise said the prior task force met about 10 times and focused on student achievement and district policy, and the new version would continue that work as a legislature-only task force. The resolution passed unanimously with favorable expression. Members next considered HB 240 on primary school promotion. Rep. Truitt explained that the bill would require students who are not ready in kindergarten to repeat kindergarten, while a committee substitute softened the approach by allowing a school to hold a child back in kindergarten but requiring action in first grade. He said the bill aligns with existing reading-screening efforts and is intended to strengthen early literacy foundations. The committee adopted the substitute and passed the bill unanimously with favorable expression; Sen. Williams briefly explained his support as favoring performance-based advancement. The committee also approved HB 298, which would change the identification of schools for comprehensive support and improvement from every three years to annually, require KDE recommendations during management audits, add professional development in reading and math, and require effective instructional resources. The committee substitute also allowed districts with multiple CSI schools to contract for a turnaround vendor. The bill additionally carried employee-misconduct provisions from prior sessions, including disclosure requirements for applicants; the only change discussed was removing the word “investigation” from one disclosure section. HB 298 passed unanimously with favorable expression, and the committee also adopted a title amendment. Finally, the committee heard HB 424 on employment at public postsecondary institutions. Rep. Tipton said the bill would require performance and productivity reviews for faculty at least every four years, clarify appointment and removal authority for presidents at certain institutions, and expand “cause” for dismissal to include failure to meet performance and productivity requirements. Dr. Ray Horton, speaking for faculty groups, proposed a small substitute that would tie any performance measures to existing employment contracts to preserve academic integrity and avoid unintended changes to tenure processes. Members discussed how tenure works at Kentucky universities, and the committee was still in the middle of considering the proposed substitute when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Program integrity is essential.
• urgency of the prepayment reviews urgency of the prepayment reviews resulted<00:30:26.480> in
• care programs. care programs.
• in Minnesota have misused programs. in Minnesota have misused programs.
• prepayment review steps and timelines. prepayment review steps and timelines.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all